How Climate Change Affects Ocean Life | Compilation
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
- This episode is sponsored by Wren, a website where you calculate your carbon footprint. Sign up to make a monthly contribution to offset your carbon footprint or support rainforest protection projects: www.wren.co/start/scishow
We can see the effects of the climate crisis in many different ways here on land. But the oceans are also part of the interconnected, global system. So, here are a few ways that climate change affects our oceanic buddies.
Hosted by: Hank Green
SciShow is on TikTok! Check us out at / scishow
----------
Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: / scishow
----------
Huge thanks go to the following Patreon supporters for helping us keep SciShow free for everyone forever:
Bryan Cloer, Sam Lutfi, Kevin Bealer, Jacob, Christoph Schwanke, Jason A Saslow, Eric Jensen, Jeffrey Mckishen, Nazara, Ash, Matt Curls, Christopher R Boucher, Alex Hackman, Piya Shedden, Adam Brainard, charles george, Jeremy Mysliwiec, Dr. Melvin Sanicas, Chris Peters, Harrison Mills, Silas Emrys, Alisa Sherbow
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
SciShow Tangents Podcast: scishow-tangents.simplecast.com/
Facebook: / scishow
Twitter: / scishow
Instagram: / thescishow
----------
Links to Original Episodes and Sources:
The Little Lobster That Reveals Climate
• The Little Lobster Tha...
A Story of Wrong-Way Migration, Caused By Climate Change
• A Story of Wrong-Way M...
Whale Poop Helps Cool Our Planet
• Whale Poop Helps Cool ...
Can Seaweed Save the World?
• Can Seaweed Save the W...
This episode is sponsored by Wren, a website where you calculate your carbon footprint. Sign up to make a monthly contribution to offset your carbon footprint or support rainforest protection projects: www.wren.co/start/scishow
Hello
It shouldn’t be.
Obvious scam.
No. Stop promoting this. No matter how we change our lives it won't matter at the individual level. It needs to change for HUGE cooperations that cause more pollution and have much more control over their influence of this massive problem and THREAT to humanity as a whole.
In France we use nuclear energy and have resisted so far to eco militants who wanted to cover our country with wind turbines
Not even oceans. I fish in Alberta and I'm only 24 years old. In my lifetime the number of invasive species, algae blooms and fish diseases that have become prominent in my area are massive. Not to mention longer winters are causing winter kills because of the lack of oxygen and in the summers the cold water fish aren't doing as well like grayling and trout.
well at least you're aware. hopefully the people around us are too.
I think people will care more if they can see the animals themselves. so far the topic about climate change usually revolves around natural disasters, i e. forrest fire. people can't see the coral bleach, the migrating snail, etc
@@MarkWTK People already see very obvious effects of climate change. The problem isn't an awareness of the effects, the problem is people refuse to believe in the cause. People refuse to believe in climate change by choice.
The earth recycles every year: Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall. The rain, snow, wind and regeneration of the forests happens supernaturally. The Sun remains the light of the day and the Moon is the light of the night. Humans manufacture oxygen for space travel, healthcare and scuba diving so we don't need trees to provide oxygen or clean the air. We have the resources to clean up the pollution, recycle plastic, recycle paper and recycle steele, but we need to improve the management of our government. The Ozone layer is proven to replenish itself automatically. God will create a new heaven and a new earth when the scriptures are fulfilled first. Isaiah 65;17, Luke 24:44
Imagine when our great great grand kids are looking back at these videos during biology classes about why nature is so ruined.
and knowing how few people believed in it & took it seriously enough to take action
.
I’d wager that our ecosystems and animals species are going to be very different in the coming generations. I don’t think all animals and plants are going to disappear, but I think a lot of the less adaptable ones are going to go extinct leaving behind only the most hardy and flexible ones behind. I think there will also be very few highly specialized species left and there won’t be any new ones for a very long time.
They won’t care. All they will be doing is spending life online. They will have no real idea or sympathy about what biodiversity is or was.
And they have no one to blame because the people who started this are long gone and left nothing to fix it..
Seaweed is very Umami. I combine dried powdered seaweed with powdered mushrooms & use it as a seasoning. Cats also seem to like unseasoned Nori sheets, & seasoned Nori is very tasty.
Oh, & it also makes good plant fertilizer.
Seaweed farming sounds like a dangerous job
I would love to see a video on this!
There is a Bill they are trying to pass in the US right now that not only affects the pet trade, but could have an effect on ecosystems too.
It's called the Lacey act and it will prevent people from bringing whatever one person arbitrairily decides is "injurious" across state lines.
Animals can cross state lines on their own. This means that this Bill, if made a law, won't stop invasive species as they come from other countries, not just across the US.
What it will do, however, is stop people from being able to get specialized vet care if the vet they see now happens to be on the other side of a state line, despite it only being 5 minutes away.
It will prevent animal reserves and preserves from getting the animals that need their help.
It will prevent people who are trying to get species off the endangered list, onto the extinct list.
It could make the people who milk venomous animals lose access to said animals, and well there goes the antivenom(in)!
And mostly, if a person moves, they take their pets with them. If a person moves and can't take their pets with them they do one of two things: The responsible and educated find the pet a new and good home. The opposite let them go free, and therin comes a componant of the massive problem that is invasive species.
These things affect not only the US but the world. We want programs that deal with endangered species and working to bounce back numbers on indangered populations. We need as many people willing to produce antivwnom(in) as we can possibly get.
If you're reading this and want to do something about it, contact your local MP, and/or organizations like USARK!
Point of order, the US does not have a parliament, we have congress made up of the senate and house of representatives. Each state generally has a similar legislative structure.
If this is an Oregon State law, only Oregon voters have a say on it now.
If it passes, the law may come before the Supreme Court. But at that point, experts in the field of veterinary care and threatened species will be able to file Amicus briefs to advise the court, but voters living in other states still won't have a say.
The only real input residents of other states might have is to donate money to organizations fighting the bill.
@@jerryfick613 Science-Channel and Atheist-Channel
are blood-related for obvious Reasons. They both advocate Rationality, so why not
give some a Try?
@@jerryfick613 I may have used some of the wrong terms, forgive me I'm not from the US, but this is _not_ a state law. It's already passed the senate and is being considered as part of the America COMPETES Act.
@@slevinchannel7589 Thanks for that. Um, was there a removed comment I missed, or was this in response to the over all tone of the previous comment? My phone may also be eating comments and I just can't see them. Forgive my curiosity lol.
@@paranoiarpincess I dont need a reason to recommend my fellow science-fans some science-youtubers.
1:03
That adorable face. He looks so happy
SQUAT LOBSTAH!!!!!
Eeeee-ooh
Golden comment
Nailed it.
I guess it depends on whether he said crab or Lobster in that sentence.
I watch every single day. Thank you for teaching me so much
Again such an interesting and good explained video. Thank you so much
Very informative, thank you!
Who knew seaweed had a use other then freaking you out when you step on a slimy clump of the stuff at the beach.
I looked up the seaweed thing and its closer to 82% of their burps and its also an Australian type of seaweed. I was glad to watch this though , it gave me a bit of a good idea about some things i could bring up in an interview
Thanks for helping my kids learn science every day! I hope they help change the world 🌎🙏🏽❤️
Stop using electricity, the internet, your Air conditioning/Furnace and you will start to change the world. Until then, you're just another hypocrite
@@CharlieKellyEsq "yet you participate in society. curious!"
@@CharlieKellyEsq You say this as if one person’s impact is even remotely noticeable relative to that of corporations.
@@OakenTome people use so much more energy than corporations. Be the change you want to see in the world
@@CharlieKellyEsq During the 19th century the Thames was an open sewer with disastrous consequences for public health in London, including cholera epidemics.
However, after the Great Stink of 1858, Parliament realised the urgency of the problem and resolved to create a modern sewerage system.
I bet your ancestor at the time would be railing against the new sewer system and saying that everyone that poops is an hypocrite.
Seaweed chips, seaweed salad, seaweed sushi bowl, etc. You can make other things with seaweed other than just sushi
Sick video
I have a request
I'm pregnant turns out that does alot of crazy things to a body can we get a video on the crazy things your body does
Like how does your body change the size of your aerials during pregnancy? Why/how does your body replenish/regrow the mucus plug? What causes restless leg problems in pregnant women? What causes some women to vomit through out pregnancy? What causes gestational diabetes? Why is eating leftovers/deli meats/raw meats so bad (what exactly is salmonella and how does it effect the fetus)?
Tacking on:
But postpartum, too. Not just postpartum depression, but how pregnant women heal after pregnancy (or not.)
I’m…honestly so *tired* of learning about my own body (and how pregnancy affects women, altho I have no intention of being pregnant or having children) via tumblr posts. And horror stories of how ALL women get utterly neglected or mocked or worse by hospital staff (with WORSE abuse and frequency of abuse for women of color.)
It just all feels like society intentionally keeping us in the dark about ourselves…while also taking away our right to bodily autonomy (and in places like Texas practically tagging us like we’re heifers!) and demanding we push out kids. But refusing to care for women who *do* choose to have children.
It’s just. Infuriating. And hard to not have this sense of helpless despair for others (and myself.)
Yayyy! Hi Hank!
Reality --> "How banker's affect climate change"
Science-Channel and Atheist-Channel
are blood-related for obvious Reasons. They both advocate Rationality, so why not
give some a Try?
19:25 the seaweed salad pictured here is delicious.
It’s Sebastian!!
…from the Little Mermaid?? That’s no crab. Thought he was a reanimated cooked lobster that already had his tail removed…but maybe he’s just a Squat Lobster. Right Color, still has the lobster claws
""just so happens that their poop is super loose and runny which is a lovely visual... ""
I kind of laughed myself under my desk... Juvenile of me, I know.
I remember seeing all the crabs in the montery bay! it was crazy, the seagulls and seals ate so many of them that their waste was red at times
it would be really amazing if as part of this same conversation you would also talk about how overfishing and discarded fishing gear are negatively affecting the climate and polluting our oceans :)
I don’t think their corporate sponsors would like that too much.
Sic show needs to talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress !!!!
If you have the space and the climate- grow your own food, instead of a big lawn- you have fruits, vegetables, herbs, medicinal plants, flowers, etc. You save money by producing your own food and you can minimize the impact of transporting and storing the food, plus it's way more satisfying than mowing and fertilizing a do-nothing patch of grass.
Love you sci show!!!!
Those red crabs look just like crawfish. I’m from Louisiana, I know what I’m talking about. Hmmm, I wander, about maybe boiling up a batch! If they taste anything at all like crawfish, we may be onto something there! Maybe a new item for beach tourism! Yum!
When will we get a scishow Compilation Compilation ? April 1st maybe
Species they come and they go 🤷♂️
What can you do you know
The part of the map highlighted was the state of Baja California del Norte, not the entirety of Baja.
When scientists say that this is the worst XXX in history, you have to keep in mind that human history only goes back a few hundred years, whereas the animals have been there for millions of years. I'm not sure this is such a big deal for them. They have endured more catastrophic events in the past and will certainly endure them in the future (long after us silly humans have gone extinct).
Life will survive us, but the current species and, biospheres will not. We are at the beginning of a mass extinction, and when it is caused by humans who understand our actions, it is much more of a moral tragedy compared to a random asteroid. A murder is worse than a natural death, even though death is inevitable. Climate change is also a direct threat to humanity, we are cutting off our nose to spite our face.
We're older than that.
I believe you're talking about the visual effects and not the fact that the humanoid population has more lead poisoning than ever.Cancer too.
@@GryphonzwingI think they mean current, civilized humans.
Thanks for not making the title a question.
Let's crop dust iron across the southern oceans. 🤣
The survivors will become a new species. This whole situation is awful, but a new species, that's pretty cool.
I'm going into conversation/ecology specifically because of how strong I feel about climate change
Hope it works out for you!
I hope you can find a job.
I didn't hear Hank mention a strong correlation between climate change and those crabs dieing. He mentioned two cases which isn't statistically significant. El Niño was a better reason. Possibly human development is to blame but hard to say it's specifically climate change.
Conversation or Conservation? 😉 I mean, either could be applicable when specifying ecology.
@@glennbabic5954 even if it's not climate change, a lot of species are dying due to man-made pollution. Can we maybe clean up some of that pollution and reduce or prevent future pollution.
There's and island of floating plastic trash the size of the State of Texas in the Pacific Ocean...
i'd really love to see more of the climate discussion shift to these active methods of trapping carbon and installing new agricultural practices over the old arguments of "use less fossil fuels" because at a certain point, just cutting emissions isn't going to save the planet anymore and it's urgently important not to give up on trying
We all know this but nobody's going to give up their warm soft bed. U 1st.
Isn’t a lobster with its tail tucked under the carapace a crab?
《Wrong-way migrations of benthic species driven by ocean warming and larval transport》，this is the work of my advisor
In, say, the USA, would it make sense for people who live inland to use seaweed in their diets and agriculture? Like surely the transportation costs away from the coasts would offset the benefits
Save Our Planet
Love from Michigan, USA, save our wildlife B4 it'z too late....we might already be!!! Unleash the beasts!!!
Hey, nice to see another michigander! I agree that we should be trying to protect and preserve all of our awesome wildlife.
its already too late, most would be extinct in a few short decades.
Are you kidding? You'll be lucky if humans don't become extinct
Squat Lobsta!!!!
I really wish corporations would do more to use less plastic and emit less greenhouse gases. If only there was some incentive for them or consequences for those who don't.
That’s communist like. Pure evil
using less plastic needs an alternative. plastic helps make things cheaper. green house gases are in variety and come from multitudes of factories. what incentive can be created to help back peddle the progress of Climate Change?
@@dojoparsnip9905 I know. My grandfather use to own a plastics company and is a chemist. There are alternatives but as long as it's ok to just throw away so much plastic after only one use there will never be change
@@TitusandTesla why are you watching this? New age Republicans hate learning or anything intellectual. They spend most their time wondering who to hate next and how to make themselves feel like the good guy.
You think the young children would be incentive enough or the fact that if they dump their billions into clean energy they'll be making more profits than they ever dreamed of
Hi!
I love seaweed! I like those dried sheets they sell everywhere in Hawaii.
I saw a video where sea urchin divers were leaving thousands upon thousands of the unwanted purple varieties to overrun the kelp beds, starving the preferred red variety. They should be hired to haul all those destructive urchins to shore to be destroyed. Duh! So simple, but hey, when have we ever seen man do the simply easy good thing?
What does seaweed fed cows taste like
Bacon.
Writer who wrote “they are pushing around the-- and stealing their lunch money”. 🎉
Empty the tanks!
El Niño = The Boy; La Niña = The Girl
I hate the taste of seaweed.... I wish I didn't, but it gags me.
I didnt realize it was a compilation and was very concerned with the outfit changes.
It's a naturally occurring crayfish boil! Still say the ocean isn't soup?
What’s up with Tiktok? I hate their aggressive advertising
Well theres plenty of fish in the sea, so the hotter it gets the harder it will be to find a date. :/
Why not make a video about Life that is *unaffected* by climate change? That’d be an unusual and interesting topic.
All forms of life are affected by climate changed because everything is interconnected.
While Cameo is certainly correct, I'd presume that micro-organisms are the least affected since they have the simplest systems and consequently should have the largest range of viable genetic mutations.
There are some species that feel the impact less than others, but all creatures are certainly affected, as all creatures are bound to their environments. Those species that feel the impact less don't exactly generate any nice stories, by the way; we're talking about people and the species heavily domesticated to their sides. Think the massive, strictly controlled "environments" that are industrial poultry farms, for example.
@@cameoshadowness7757 so the 1000s of predators propagating in north america currently is because of...climate change?
@@RobertMJohnson what do you mean by that?
I am simply stating all life is affected becuase everything is connected to eachother.
Engagement engagement engagement
#390-✅👍🏻
I'm curious with warmer global temperatures on land and in the ocean how much additional life will be possible with all the new northern hemisphere areas unlocked from permafrost and freezing ocean temperatures? We know the earth has been far warmer than it is currently multiple times in history so this won't be the first time. How much fertile soil will be unlocked?
Also who decided what Earth's appropriate average temperature is or should be? How do we know our current temperature isn't actually a few degrees cooler than what the Earth's average temperature is over its entire history? There's been multiple times in the past that the Earth didn't have any polar ice caps, so how do we know if we currently have just the right amount or more than the average amount historically speaking?
Lol the glaciers of the last ice age scoured the land. What you have as soil is 10,000 years of pine trees needles south of the tree line. It is basically rock with a couple of feet at most of acidic soil if you are lucky.
@@lenabreijer1311 I'm not talking about just land currently under ice caps and permafrost, just here in northern US and Canada has millions of acres of land too cold to farm currently but would be useable in the future.
@@OneNationUnderGod. yep that is what I am talking about. That land is all rock with a skim of soil. I guess you haven't spent much time there. Granite with a layer of acidic soil. You could grow blueberries there. Lots of water though. And swamp. Oh and a lot of it is native reserves because it is so poor. And even if it is warmer you still have a short growing season.
@@lenabreijer1311 east of the Cascades (where I have family) there's millions of acres of wheat, millet and other dry land crops. That land is about as nutrient deficient as anything you're talking about, modern farming has opened up lots of previously areas thought to be unusable. Temperatures have been what holds back crops more than soil quality, corn for example is more dependant on receiving enough therms during the summer for high yields than nutrients.
"Also who decided what Earth's appropriate average temperature is or should be?"
The appropriate temperature for the organisms of the quaternary are.. the temperature of the quaternary. The appropriate temperature for civilization is the temperature it formed and adapted to, the holocene temperature: 14 C
"How do we know our current temperature isn't actually a few degrees cooler than what the Earth's average temperature is over its entire history?"
Why do you think the appropriate temperature for our planet is an average of what the planet had over the last 4.5 billion years? that's just absurd. Example: in the Hadean the earth's temperature was above 100 C (212 F) So you are going to include this temperature in the average??? Multicelular organisms (Plants and animals) only exist in the last 700 million years so what does the average temperature before multicelular organisms (most of the earth's history, 3.8 billion years) has to do with anything? If you were running things in the science department we'd all be dead by now. You have no idea of the basics of biology, paleontology and paleoclimatology.
Climate issues, on top of over fishing that is collapsing fisheries; plastic pollution; fish farms with ;pathogenic implications to native species; thousands of synthesized chemicals; nuclear waste dumped into the oceans; factory farms and agricultural runoff due to industrial agriculture, causing dead zones from all the high nutrient loads and leaky oil production platforms. All add to the problems with our ocean's ecosystem. But the core issue is a largely unresponsive, irresponsible, myopic, self- indulgent species, that if it really cared would establish and enforce meaningful environmental laws with demonstrable lasting benefit.
Let's put solar panels on every home, business and covered parking rooftop and switch to electric vehicles making nearly everything we do solar powered while completely decentralizing our power supply and empowering everyone as power generation owners.
Solar power is CHEAPER and electric vehicles are soon to be CHEAPER to make and already are considerably CHEAPER to maintain and operate, especially if charged from your own solar power.
A 3-5 year ROI (return on investment) for a solar array that will generate power for decades is a no-brainer and the panels can even be made locally too.
#EndFossilFuels #SwitchToSolar #SwitchToElectric #GreenNewDeal #EmpowerEveryone #DEMEXIT #StillSandersPlatform
And how clean is the production of these panels?
Personally, what I think we need is to figure out how to dispose of waste from nuclear plants and then switch to that.
@@thehowlingjoker The waste from nuclear power plants is already negligible. If you powered the entire world with nuclear power you could fit all the nuclear waste in the place the fossil fuel power plants took up with plenty of room to spare. Long term containment has already been solved, there's no shortage of space, the only reason nuclear power isn't so popular is that uranium is hard to mine and people are ignorantly afraid of nuclear power.
@@Corzappy We can't just stick the waste somewhere like that. It needs to be put somewhere it won't be disturbed or threaten life, like deep underground as is the norm now. The issue is finding somewhere stable and resistant enough to not go wrong.
@@thehowlingjoker Spent nuclear fuel can be recycled to get ~25-30% additional energy and reduce volume by ~85%, which will additionally cause the recycled fuel to be far less radiactive, reaching the original radioactivity of it's ore in 9,000 years (vs 300,000 years)
There is usually a disposal ON SITE for a lot of nuclear power plants, otherwise it's sent for off-site disposal. 90% of all waste types already have an acceptable long-term disposal methods, such as a near-surface disposal facility, contrary to your belief that they have to be "deep underground".
Near surface storage is used in tons of places like the UK, Spain, France, Sweden, Finland, Russia, South Korea, Japan, and the USA. Any biproducts of recycling or disposal have been confirmed to be negligible in effect.
The waste that cannot be safely stored in these near-surface facilities are indeed stored deep underground, I still don't see how that is an issue.
Stable earth to bury radioactive material isn't hard to come by, we're certainly nowhere near running out.
Solar panels are not easily disposed of, they don't have anywhere near the same energy density as a nuclear power plant, and the waste density is far less as a result.
It's like trying to weight something down with 1,000,000 feathers or a block of steel, yeah the feathers don't last for thousands of years, but it's easier to bury a steel block than to deal with 1,000,000 feathers.
There is no such thing as clean energy. We're just trading one pollution for another and that hasn't worked well in history.
Imagine being pleased to be cropdusted by a whale's runny dumps, yeesh............ :S
NO it
Lets clone some whales
'Soylent-Green' could be another solution to the world's food-supply issues!
Ill "soylent green" you :P
" Soylent Green is humans" Eat Well.
@@craigb8228 Tastes like pork?
The mud snail could still survive because it is born into a warmer Is climate therefore more able to adapt to the warmer climate
i guess that's what happens when you don't own, or take with you the elemts youre made with to gut fish...
Hear the new JRE with Steven E. Koonin? You should really go on his show
Meeting Dr.Obaedo on RUclips has really been one of the best day of my life after years of suffering I have finally been cured, thank you doc God bless you.
667
Pronounce miaz right. It's sounds like mice
Just how do you pronounce the Appalachian part of the U.S.?
omg... The baby snails don't need our help we've already given our human help too much. The virus that is the human species has helped enough.
than sea plankton love ship release human poop.. but they complaint is bad environment?! is okay whale doing it?
Cant we seed the ocean with iron? And aslo fix the sperm whale population.
First
Bugs for meat would help even more. More nutrition in a n even more portable package. Less has to be done to eat it.
Grows faster.
Cheaper.
Also only a few countries don't eat bugs. Unfortunately those are also the ones who had electricity first.
So Minecraft got it right; Seaweed farms are a way to get infinite fuel for your super smelter.
Hi
Wren is a scam. You don't need help to calculate your carbon footprint, it is directly proportional to the money you spend.
BRANDON just got spanked in court on his leases in the gulf for oil and drilling and cables and pipelines...that might help.
Trump just got spanked for illegally reporting his corporate worth.
Taking sponsors from wren only perpetuates the idea that all global trash and carbon output is blamed on the individuals rather than the corporations that refuse to adapt to a more conscious market. We simply do not have the time, budget, or ability to live a completely emission free lifestyle because these companies save money by not having to clean up after themselves and use unsafe and carbon boasting practices instead of safer options because anything healthier would simply cost too much for their margins. These companies don’t even let that added money trickle down far enough for the lowest workers to live a carbon free life, all it does is line the pockets of the CEOs. Year after year companies like exon and Bp are polluting water ways, trading eachother the same 3 carbon offset plots of land, and kill thousands of people a year with air pollution when nuclear wind and water have not even a fraction of the deaths or risks.
By you taking this sponsor you are spitting in the faces of your followers that you took the years to educate on these issues, apparently we put grew you if many of us have to post comments like these under every bit of profit you want to turn over for going against the education you used to care about. The money is not worth it, you are lining another companies pockets more than your own by letting these people think this service is made in any good faith. Please screw your heads back on and get back to what you’re good at even if you’re not being paid just as much as these pro carbon shilling efforts give you. You’re teaching people much more worth than however many hundreds of dollars extra you get to do this. Please, dear god.
Capitalism/communism and environmental conscience are in total opposition.
Compromise is literally impossible.
@@user-Cata7sti7ma7 Can you elaborate? Your wording is a little confusing and I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say.
@@gavinjenney5627 what they mean is that capitalism/consumerism relies on complete control and excessive output of product for the least amount of money to make the most profits. Majority of this is from clearing land to grow or build the most possible for the least spent to then have people buy cheaply made items for a higher price to turn a profit and expand indefinitely.
You can’t do that while trying to fight for a green and carbon/trash free world. We aren’t putting materials to use, we are using them and throwing them away so we have to buy them again. Recycling would only cost money and no one has enough.
Capitalism needs to be taken down or drastically changed if we want to save the planet
Question : Is fire alive ? It "breathes" , and "eats" and it "reproduces" Can you do a video on what you find out .?
Just because you use anthropomorphic descriptors for inanimate objects doesn't mean they're alive.
Fire requires oxygen from the atmosphere to combust, and requires fuel to power the combustion, and that can create a chain reaction that sets other fuel sources on fire.
There, "breathing" is using an oxidizer, "eating" is using fuel, and "reproducing" is a chain reaction. Sounds a lot less like life when you use the right words.
@@Corzappy Perhaps , but for the sake of debate , Doesn't the Iron in our blood oxidize as we breathe , and I have heard food referred to as fuel , And who said their is only one kind of reproduction after all when an amoeba divides into 2 new cells is not that a chain reaction . Yes words are important but so aren't definitions and descriptors . That is Biology's heart and soul . Therefore the question remains ; Is fire alive ? It sure acts like it is .
@@franzjayne672 The blood in your body is already oxidized, it doesn’t create oxides when it transports oxygen, it’s incomparable to combustion.
Fuel is a loose term, if you consider fuel to be a source of energy then everything in the universe uses fuel.
It’s like saying knives are sharp and long and made of metal and pins are sharp and long and made of metal so pins must be a kitchen utensil.
@@Corzappy Skewers are a different term but they are pins and they are kitchen utensils . That aside everything is the universe is fuel really ..... and uses fuel in one form or another , E=mc2 isn't just for atomic bombs it shows the that matter and energy(fuel) are the same thing in different states . Iron in your blood has two states Fe O2 and FeO3 both are considered Oxides of iron . They add iron filings to cereal and other foods so your body can make enough Red Blood cells BTW red is the color of rust and rust is iron oxide . The blood traveling back to your heart and lungs is a different shade , Bluish purple because it no longer has Iron oxides but iron carbonates , when you cut yourself the blood is either dark or bright red ....why is this ? because one has more oxides than the other . dark is less O2 and more toxins bright is fully Oxidized . Your vessels are colorless and semitransparent . Is fire alive ? It is an on going debate that still has not been resolved , since to shows all of the characteristics that define life , even if it is only a chemical reaction . So are also many of the functions that keep us alive , including thought . Think on that for a moment please .
@@franzjayne672 It shows all the functions that match YOUR definition of “life”.
I could make the definition of life that it exists that doesn’t mean everything is alive.
YT channel, "Alex Epstein"
Fish aren't real
Earth is 4.6 billion years old, I guarantee the oceans were much warmer in the past.
And?
Source: Trust me bro lmao
while yes, there have been times where the oceans were warmer, that also meant it was accompanied by much different species of animals who were adapted for those temperatures, and whom are now extinct or have evolved into the animals we know today. they are not the same animals at all
there's also the fact that the *rate* at which the waters are warming is much higher than they have ever before, thanks to humans emitting greenhouse gasses way faster than natural processes happen. in geological time, the temperatures are rising as they would if you turned on the heat inside your house instead of waiting for summer to come. it's far too quick.
now combining both the creatures alive now being adapted for very specific temperatures, and the fact that temperatures are growing too rapidly, the animals we have simply don't have the time or ability to evolve and adapt to higher temperatures. they're only choice is to try to migrate, messing up delicate ecosystems, or to die, also messing up delicate ecosystems.
billions of creatures, including us, depend on those ecosystems through food chains. surely you've heard of them in school? we eat the things that ate the things that are now dying. if you can't connect the dots, let me help:
if marine animals die, the animals who ate those ones will also die due to lack of food. and the animals who ate those will also die for the same reasons. this will eventually lead back to humans, leading to food shortages and population decline. combine lack of food with growing temperatures that humans cannot grow food or survive in, and im sure you can see that it's not an ideal or good situation at all
i suggest you start thinking more about what you're saying before you say it. you sound like an idiot
@@bumblebeagan Nobody wants to read your novella. I think the point being made is that cycles of life are a thing, and humans are so arrogant that we believe we have the right to persist when, in reality, we're just borrowing the planet.
I don't think anyone is debating the continued persistence of the Earth. Just most of the living things on the Earth as we know them.
There's that term again, "climate change". Climate change has been going on long before us, can we not find a more accurate term
"nature"
@@incelshateme which is a religion
The problem is that in all of earths history, our effect on the earth has made the natural climate change speed up by 1000 times. That’s from the words of David Attenborough. The animals and plants aren’t able to adapt as quickly as they would have during natural change. There have been mass extinctions from natural disasters like asteroids and volcanos, but it took millions of years for the fauna to be comparable to the numbers before the extinction. At our rate we would be killing the animals and plants faster than they could replenish themselves.
@@Van-Leo that must be why nearly every single predator is expanding on the North American continent
You leftists should really try critical thinking
Life PROPAGATES right now. Wolves are growing in numbers. As are grizzlies. As are alligators. As are pythons. As are spiders
What on earth are you talking about with “‘extinction”????
Human population explosion is the issue, by the way
Yoo
Soylent, Green?
I think this channel is also sponsored by the world government
More life and sciences needs to be seen rather than pretty girls, muscled guys, and essential “air” on the internet.
The second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it turned into blood like that of a dead man, and every living thing in the sea died. -Revelation 16 1
I thought of this when the scientist was describing the red alge bloom
I don't doubt climate change, but blaming it for everything is lazy. Four degrees increase in the ocean seems a lot when climate doesn't even vary that much, and when other explanations like El Niño have presented statistically more times with stronger correlation.
It is not lazy, it is a profitable business for many companies
How Earth's global climate has always been ever-changing, since it's formation. Earth's global climate has never been stable or static, and never will. And Earth's global climate would change, regardless of the existence of humans on it, and will regardless of what Humanity does or does not do.
Are you a scientist? Have you done any research? It's extremely obvious the accelerated rate of climate change we're seeing is driven by our actions. The changes correspond perfectly with human history after the industrial revolution and the rate is far faster than what naturally occurs. Sure, life will continue after we're gone, even after we've caused so much damage, but this isn't natural AT ALL. This type of climate change is supposed to happen over the course of thousands of years AT THE ABSOLUTE MINIMUM, but we've made it happen in less than 200 years. Life can't adapt or evolve nearby fast enough, were seeing irrefutable proof of that in real time, and any life that comes after will be less diverse.
The long-term natural cycles of climate are absolutely irrelevant to the extreme acceleration we see today.
@@nikm5628 yes I am. And no you haven't. It is extremely obvious, you are just parroting and regurgitating "For Public Consumption" information. There is no "perfectly" anything in "Research", there is always "Error Rates" in "Empirical Data". You are not seeing irrefutable proof of anything. And you obviously know nothing about the cyclical diversity of life that has occurred for billions of years on Earth. This type of climate change has no "ABSOLUTE MINIMUM", as a matter OF FACT, Earth is still experiencing an "Ice Age" and another MATTER OF FACT...Earth for most of its over 4 BILLION years of existence, has been totally ice free for the majority of that existence! Earth's "Global Climate" has no "supposed to happen" anything...AND THAT IS A FACT! Volcanoes and the over 70% of Earth's surface are Oceans and the tilted..."Precession"...semi eccentric "orbit" and celestial body strikes are the lions share of global wide "Climate Change", and will be till our Sun inflates into a Red Giant.
'Sure, life will continue after we're gone, even after we've caused so much damage, but this isn't natural AT ALL.' = Nothing more than a statement of "Virtue Signalling"!
@@logitech4873 The long-term parroting and regurgitation of that line is absolutely ambiguous, as it is meant for people like you to repeat.
@@tommylee2894 Come with a real argument. You're arguing against a scientific consensus that's existed for more than 50 years. You might as well be trying to disprove gravity.
Yep, climate affects life. Congrats geniuses.
No. Stop promoting this. No matter how we change our lives it won't matter at the individual level. It needs to change for HUGE cooperations that cause more pollution and have much more control over their influence of this massive problem and THREAT to humanity as a whole.
The number one cause of pollution is weather. Unless we want to specify carbon dioxide pollution.
You know it is propaganda when the thumbnail is an ugly, frightening, and purely emotional picture
We need capitalistic inventors to create tech to aim at saving this wildlife. Many valuable items and financial rewards for investors could incentivize it if only government wasn’t in charge of funding almost all “science”..
@Josef K no it’s not that simple.. how was science funded before modern governments monopolized it?
@Josef K regulations are not rights protections.. regulations violate inalienable individual rights to life, liberty, property, and pursuit of happiness. Government forcefully taxes us to fund the “science of its choosing” and as a consequence the FDA has made life extension research and otherwise private research so illegal that it needs to be done offshore.
@@bradbecker8982 "no it’s not that simple.." Yeah if only it _was_ as simple as "capitalistic inventors to create tech to aim at saving this wildlife" right?
@@lordmashie where this is profit to be made, there is a will and a way.
@@bradbecker8982 The profits to be made are in *destroying* the environment, in case the persistence of big energy (and basically every other sector) hadn't made that obvious enough already.
This is propaganda, not science.
How so?
Wake up we are least of the problem smh how can you be a science channel. Such low content and education.
Huh?
@@logitech4873 humans have very little to do with climate change, if you look over 100,000 year time scale it’s normal that climate is changing. We dumb humans are looking at in our life time.
@@MrUms431 We're having an extreme effect on the acceleration of climate change due to our CO2 output. It's never been normal for climate to change this quickly outside of events such as supervolcano eruptions and large meteorite strikes.
I recommend you read up on climate research.
@@logitech4873 oceans and plastics yeah maybe but everything else is blown out of proportion. We have more trees then 100 years ago and less farm land.
@@MrUms431 I'm talking about climate change, not reforestation and plastic waste.
BS
If you don’t like having a fact based discussion then leave
OK B O O M E R
This is pure propaganda « sponsored by Wren » about a topic already well covered everywhere all the time. This is counterproductive and annoying.
If it existed. No science to prove any of this, this video is grabbing at straws for sure.
Climate change has already been proven, countless times, this video is not about convincing you it's real, it's about demonstrating it's undeniable effects on nature.
@@Corzappy it's only real if you want it to be just like the tooth fairy. No one ever peer reviews any of the experiments and they all use each other as citations in their scientific papers. This is junk science. Just scratch the surface and you will see.
@@joedzny That is verifiably false on every level and the amount of hypocrisy you put on display would be laughable if it weren't already sad and pitiful.
@@Corzappy Why don't you question it. That's good science isn't it? This boogieman has been around for decades and nothing substantial has changed. This is all about power and the ability to completely control every aspect of your life. Whether you know it or not. Look up what ESG is and see how that fits in to the "climate narrative". If your truly curious you wont take "experts" at their word (2 weeks to flatten the curve comes to mind). search this article in the guardian and just look at it from another angle (Climate change is an obvious myth - how much more evidence do you need?).
@@joedzny How many times every day do you beat yourself over the head with a brick to kickstart your brain? And how many times does it take before you give up?