MP18 Comparison - Battlefield 1 vs Verdun | Weapon Wars
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2016
- Comparing Battlefield 1’s and Verdun's MP18 to the real world Maschinenpistole 18/I. Who did it better, Battlefield 1 or Verdun?
Subscribe ►goo.gl/UXER8c
Join Us on Discord ► discordapp.com/invite/af3B2aE
Follow me on Twitch ► www.twitch.tv/beardedmitch
Follow me on Twitter ► / thebeardedmitch
Computer Specs▼
i7 3770K @ 3.50 GHz
16 GB G.Skill Ram
SABERTOOTH Z77
GIGABYTE GTX 970 
Игры
"stg44 is a crude version of an AK 47" holy fuck that made me cringe
I'd say the AK47 is a crude version of the STG44
shawn fisher really nigga
the stg 44 was the first assault ever designed
im pretty sure as the story goes a russian tank commander named kalash-something picked up a stg44 from the battlefield and started his own design based of the stg44
Jayden Davis no nigga, stg 44 is completely different than the AK 47. The only thing the Russians copied was the concept of an assault rifle.
I would suggest some light background music. Something not distracting, but enough to fill the empty space.
Some would say the AK-47 is a crude version of the STG-44 ;)
Eross Van Leer Except they are very different firearms.
Keegan Wells eh in a sense mind you this that the AK-47 used the STG as a base
Dino Dino not actually. If you look at the internals, they are very different.
The internals are very different, but as far as being manufactured they tried to replicate the stg44. They failed with the AK47, but once they had figured out stamping like the Germans they built the AKM.
The Bearded Mitch exactly
Sound is not subjective. Either it sounds like the actual weapon or not.
Edalwulf Bergmann lol
Understand that I am from a section of the internet where that IS the nice way. I only called the OP a faggot once in that post and I didn't even insult them.
+Edalwulf Bergmann go back to 4chan you clown lmao
Edalwulf Bergmann meet you on pol shitlord hahaha
>4chan a shit
HAH! No. 4chan is the greatest place on the internet.
You should totally compare the sound of the gun in game to real life and it could help us check the accuracy of the sound
Weapon Wars Episode #2 will be released Tuesday, December 21,2016 - 12:00 PM Eastern U.S….. “SOON”
are you in the army and thanks for the great video
I think you failed to account the accessibility of the weapon in Verdun, it accurately depicts the amount of the gin historically, it was made late in the war and was very rare on some fronts, in Battlefield, everyone is using it making it too common and inaccurate
from my understanding the recoil direction thing only affects which way the gun kicks, so if you select your direction as left and start shooting itll start kicking to the left, or select right and itll start kicking to the right
The Bearded Mitch Before the Germans where banned to produce more MP18 and the mp18 experimental was going to be used, but it never was made.
The Beretta Automatico M1918 was the first practical SMG used in combat, it was used 3 weeks before the MP18. And the Beretta had a doctrin.
Explain me a thing: why is everyone praising BF1 as some glorious god-made whatever?
I do not agree. Verdun did it better. Battlefield has another modern submachine gun disguised as MP-18.
Verdun has the MP-18. Verdun isnt meant bo be fancy nor beautiful. Verdun is for the realism. The grey and brown reality.
Battlefield 1 is just another cash-in battlefield, disguised in WW1 clothes, with an emotional campaign meant to grab the critics by the feels, graphics that are meant to blind them with the shaders, and dead simple mechanics so that people can find themselves in it more easily. Basically i can just call it a huge retexture. Everything is the same. Only good thing is that they havent left the reflex sights in it. Im not a smart person, and this is my opinion. Downdooted.
+Konrad M.
I don't think many people around here would disagree with most of the things you said. I also think my comparison basically agreed with your points.
Verdun is by far more historically accurate, but Battlefield 1 (EA Dice) have the money and the resources to make an incredibly beautiful game that loosely simulates WW1 for the masses. They are two diffrent games played by (most of the time) two diffrent types of fps player.
That does not make either any better or worse as a game though.
Konrad Well stated, and yes; Verdun did everything better. It just amazes how the big gaming corporations, are hypnotizing these "sheep" out here today. To the point where people don't even realize that they're being resold the same game; but re-skinned. Case in point; (Baffle)field 1
>game has a bad campaign, is called weak
>game has a good campaign, is called out for just having it to grab critics
I know this video encourages debate and I enjoy it, but there is room for both games and fans of each. +Juste Ping / + GHOST11656 feel free to re-post a new comment, but please keep it civil.
Some people don’t care about their channels and comments section, but I would like to keep mine as toxic free as possible. I need your help to do that though. Thank you for your passion!
Juste Ping lol thanks for a good laugh let me start of with this I play Verdun ARMA 3 red orchestra and fuck me I even play mount and blade Napoleonic wars which is a hard-core shooter with muskets with shit accuracy and sabers and cannons that take forever to reload but at the same time I also love halo battlefield titanfall I enjoyed call of duty during the modern warfare era I don't give a shit what I play as long as I find entertainment in it that's your first mistake assuming my preference secondly I admit there are problems with it and areas I want them to improve on so does the fan base but we still love it battlefield 1 is not a perfect game but its dam good just like Verdun its a good game but has its flaws and if you want to experience what WW1 was like make a time machine go to the past join the army get shipped to the front and then you will truly know what it will feel like when you are lying on the ground bleeding to death after artillery shrapnel shredded your artery apart . and again consumer preference does not make better then you or you better then me
The stg44 isn't a crude AK47 dude good fun video but little things like that annoyed the nit picker in me
Leonard Crainie ya lol. It's less crude.
It's also kinda irritating that the stg came out before the AK, so if you would compare the two it's the other way around.
the russians made the german scientists ccreate the ak-47 after the war, it is a crude ak
csjdruid Not exactly. It was designed by a Russian (Kalashnikov) although it's design was still based on the STG 44.
Rayyan Ali o wait ur right, kalashnikov wanted to take the best assault rifle and rifle which was the stg44 and m1 grand and make 1 rifle.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47
"The AK-47 is best described as a hybrid of previous rifle technology innovations. "Kalashnikov decided to design an automatic rifle combining the best features of the American M1 and the German StG44."[20] Kalashnikov's team had access to these weapons and had no need to "reinvent the wheel". Kalashnikov himself observed: "A lot of Russian Army soldiers ask me how one can become a constructor, and how new weaponry is designed. These are very difficult questions. Each designer seems to have his own paths, his own successes and failures. But one thing is clear: before attempting to create something new, it is vital to have a good appreciation of everything that already exists in this field. I myself have had many experiences confirming this to be so."[18]"
"There are claims about Kalashnikov copying other designs, like Bulkin's TKB-415[21] or Simonov's AVS-31.[22]"
C96! Battlefield 1, Verdun, and Day of Infamy!
ya
Loïc Cardenas I don't think the c96 in day of infamy can be compared to the ww1 games becomes day of infamy is in ww2 and the c96 in day of infamy is modified
The MP-18 is all wrong in Battlefield 1. It should only be available at a high level and not the first gun in the assault class and should not be as powerful.
Harryhas26 Imo the mp18 is really not that powerful. In close range, it gets outclassed by almost every weapon of any class, I think it's a good starter weapon, but not more.
Automatico is the true king of smg's
Harryhas26 I disagree, the gun is just fine.
I haven't used the MP18 for a long time because of the guns that outclass it. The automatico is great to drop people fast and the shotguns are the true kings on the battlefield. I used to love the A-10, recently been running the 12G Extended mag, that thing is a fucking BEAST.
The MP18 is good for newer players as it has low recoil, moderate spread and rewards long bursts
What lets verdun down is the movement feels clunky, and the animations are quite rough too.
I once hit a 100+ M head shot with the MP18 in Verdun. It was SOOOO SATISFYING!!!
he said the STG was just a crude version of the AK, but the AK was based on the STG
Meeep90 Meeep90 ikr
AK took some inspiration from it. But it was not based on the STG-44.
he said it looked like a crude version, which it kind of does.
Meeep90 Meeep90 of course it was, the same way a F18 Fighter Jet was clearly the direct influence of the M18 Chaffee light tank
Flynn Crawford tru dat
What's with the unnecessary dislikes? It's simply an informative video that clearly took time and effort
Will Bourner These are simply dislikes, people who express their opinion. Why bother?
Thank for trying to stick up for the video Will! It is ok though; some people comment some people dislike. When you make an opinion video, someone is going to disagree.
Please don't use 1/2 ratings like "3 1/2 2 1/2 ETC. just use straight up scores it drives me crazy when people use half scores
I’ll try, but in episode 2 I was very close to going to 3.8.
I figured that would have been maddening for most though.
wel you forgot 1 thing
you were talking about the bad engine but think about the money that went into verdun vs battlefield 1.
so i dont think texture and sound shouldnt be catagories
Not angry, I actually really enjoyed this, but obviously a AAA game would beat an Indie game. They have more access to different things, for example they can actually record real sounds of weapons from the source, whereas Indie devs just don't have the money to do that
I agree with you and I did not state it in the video but I kind of expected BF1 to score higher. I purposely did not tally up the scores
as I went along so I was very surprised by how close Verduns MP18 scored to BF1.
BF1 does have a lot of flash, but Verdun is very well done for the tools they had to work with and is still a great game.
The Bearded Mitch I couldn't have summed it up better
Undead Unicorn Easy for you to say, I'm triggered af right now.
Lmao i like how people keep bringing up the gun sounds for bf1 as if it is a arguement cuz half guns were prototypes in the game or just impossible to get get in real life in general cuz they were never produced so the actual gun sounds in bf1 that are actually real are a handful not only that but they are dumbed down so you don't go deaf so in reality the gun sounds on bf1 are no better than verdun and tbh i prefer verdun better as i have fired guns in real life and verdun sounds more like you are actually firing the gun without ear protection where i feel like bf1 it sounds muffled and generic to where some of the guns sound exactly the same because they probably just used the same sound file but might or might have not changed it slightly
Well the mp18 in verdun has a much more accurate fire rate
I spent a
lot of time on this one video, like way to much time. Please let me know what
you great people think. Should I continue doing this kind of video or should I
stick with lets plays?
You get my full support, but that's mainly the history nerd in me.
Thanks, as always man, I am the same way. Love me some history!
You could make it shorter if you want, you talked a lot about details(like how subjective the sound is, and how historically accurate it is).
The next one should be a bit shorter; mostly because I won’t
have to explain as much of what I am doing with weapon wars.
Yeah keep doing it, just a bit shorter
Battlefield One wasn't designed to be a simulator. It was meant be a battlefield game. Wasn't even fair for you to judge Battlefield in the historical accurate section. Lol
Some say its not fair to compare indie Verdun to AAA Battlefield. If I make to many rules I can't compare anything. Thanks for watching Josiah!
The Bearded Mitch I understand, thanks for making a series on RUclips that I might actually watch. {-}7
Actually the burst version of the MP18 was a thing they experimented with it at the end of the war but the project got cut because there was no need for it and the sight is a British sight that was tested on Lee enfields
This is a bit nitpicky, but I couldn't help commenting. The Stg isn't anything like an AK mechanically. They share a similar shape, but the AK is piston driven, and the Stg is a roller delayed blowback action. The Stg influenced the G33 and the G3 directly. The AK's development was The AK was designed originally as an SMG to replace the PPSH in Soviet, it's development was original.
Both AK and STG-44 use a long stroke gas piston. The STG-45 prototype used a roller delayed blowback.
redneck96100 Thank you, I stand corrected. I just looked at the pistons from both rifles and they're super similar. lol
AK and STG-44 using a similar gas piston=COMMIES COPIED SUPERIOR UBERMENSCH TECHNOLOGY
NotACop of course they did
Fantastic video, you nailed it for me :D
Only thing is i would turn the sound up on when you are letting us hear the different gun sounds (only slightly mind)
and turning down the sound of the numbers alternating when you are tallying up the scores!
Those are my only two criticisms though, i thoroughly enjoyed your video.
I noticed I recorded those sound clips with my streaming settings, which has a pretty low volume setting compared to the microphone. Thank you very much for the input and support. Hopefully I can get a better sound balance next time!
The Bearded Mitch my utmost pleasure dear sir! Keep on rolling :D
Wish BF1 has a realistick mode with experimemtal guns and guns rarely used in WW1 made less appearances, have double damage, support not be able to hip fire LMGs and mustard gas did instakill.
Why would support not be able to hip-fire LMGs? You know that was an actual tactic that machine-gun carriers were *instructed* to do, right? It was called "walking fire", I think
Undead Unicorn I assume you don't know history or just trolling.
Undead Unicorn fine I'll elaborate during ww1 and 2 lmgs were used by 2 or more soldiers depending on its typed. In modern fps it is fired and reloaded solo by one soldier which is unrealistic due to it being heavy, needing to be water cooled and reloaded with heavy ammo thus the reason a group of soldiers was used to operate lmgs. The mp18 would later be designed for the lone use of a soldier which was light and easier to reload.
Undead Unicorn also though the BAR would be developed for the use of marching fire due to its low weight and portable ammo it would end up being used mostly with the use of the tripod. The BAR''s low ammo magazine size contributed negatively for its intended use.
Undead Unicorn Pluss the accuracy by hip fire is too much for me to be realistic as a lmg. They should buff the damage but lower hip fire accuracy.
the sound is spot on, I don't know how they did, but I've watched a video of the British war museum and they did film a original MP-18 shooting, it sounds pretty much like that, I think they used the MP-21 or MP-28 to record, which are exactly the same, both are slightly converted versions of the original MP-18 (this is why it is so rare), you can even make it return to what it was if you have one.
on the note of Verdun's sound. I am friends with one of the staff members and they have sourced C&R arsenal to record all the weapon sounds to replace current placeholders
Awesome, that is going to be great the hear!
The Bearded Mitch there are a list of changes I was going to quiz him on today. but a family member passed away in the night and I don't want to be a callous arse and bug him. I did a tiny amount of work myself on the game providing some of the finer details on the Lee Metford rifle and for the American revolvers. but don't know any Inside secrets. I do know that the wex is going the be modified to improve its function. after the range and power were heavily needed a couple updates ago.
Thank you everyone for your support. Glad to know I am not
making these videos just for myself and that others enjoy them.
Please let me know if there is anything you would like to
see changed or reexamined in terms of the review process or the categories.
Also, please let me know what games/weapons you would like
to see
Thank you all again!
This is exactly the kind of video I've been looking for. Someone who also accounts for historical accuracy and context when discussing a weapon, and comparing it through that lenses of vastly different games.
I am very glad you enjoyed it!
Keep in mind verdun has 3 devs....
Next should be the gewehr 98
I believe the AK 2012 from metro compared to any other AK 2012, would be very interesting
Tiger Tank Gaming BF4 AK12 vs R6s Ak12?
AK2012 is completely fictional gun only in Metro series. AK-12 from BF or other games is a real life gun slowly being implemented into russian armament replacing older AK derivation (akm, ak-74 etc.). Only thing they have in common is "AK" and "12" in their names.
Jakub Bláha the Russians are dropping the ak12 for the ak74m3 and you can see the ak74m3 in there victory day parade
This could be a great series. I think you did a good job with the MP18, and would like to see more!
You randomly showed up in my feed but this series is interesting.
Great video dude you nailed it and also a very good in-depth review of the two games.
Thank you for the comment James, glad you enjoyed it!
good job thingking of this series man ;) good to see someone with the same passion of guns in vid games
If only Verdun's Graphics and Weapons were a lot more immersive, because I've seen a BF1 game done historical, amazing.
WOW! Very informative! Great vid!
This is gonna be a great series hope it kicks off
awesome video, subscribed!
I’m glad you enjoyed it and welcome to the community!
Subbing for weapon wars, unfortunately living in the UK my access to real firearms is severely limited however I still find this stuff really interesting; especially bolt action rifles (late 19th century to early 20th century)and early sub machine guns, as opposed to modern automatic weapons such as the AR 15.
Thank you for subscribing. With all the support this initial episode has gotten I will continue; I know there’s some bolt action rifles that I want to cover. My dream is at some point to partner with other creators or businesses with access to these weapons so I can include that in the
episodes.
Metalhead Forlife AR15 isn't automatic
Foxtrot A good example of how much I know then :D *facepalm*
Good job man suscribed!
Seems like this will become a good series. Subbed!
Love these style of videos Love it.
btw the lattey sights do exist and while the mp18 might not have had a bayonet, i'm fairly sure the beretta did, which makes it a balancing decision.
also you didn't mention weapon mechanics: how loadin bullets works for example, in bf1 pretty much every gun except th m95 load exactly as they would in real life, with distinction between open and closed bolt guns too.
It was definitely a balancing decision. Like I said I judged the weapons in their world and looked at how that reflects the real world mp18.
EA Dice had to create a massive game that supported balance play. So, while most objects they put in this world existed during the WW1 time frame; they did a lot of mixing and matching which is just not accurate. It’s still a fun game for a lot of people though!
The Bearded Mitch i know,it's just that the way you said it those things didn't exist at all.
Ah I got you, if it sounded that way it was mot supposed to.
Thanks for mentioning the weapon mechanics. That is something I will have to look at possibly incorporating into future videos.
Thanks for watching and commenting!
Those mp18 sets were tested really before war ended(sight and exp) but they were manifactured only in very few numbers something like 20/30 of emonly the bayonet is unreal xD All bf1 weap saw the field before the ending even if only for testing pourpouse great video man
Great video, I look forward to more. I am glad Dice chose to not go with historical accuracy, I enjoy Battlefield for it being Battlefield, it doesn't pretend to be anything more than a fun video game, BF1942 was not historically accurate and it would be very silly to expect that fourteen years later.
+No STG I agree with you completely. Glad you enjoyed the video!
I'm gonna be brutal honest when you started the battlefield 1 mp18/I I got kinda angry but changed my opinion towards the end when you did the historical accuracy part because to be honest I felt the same when I first watched gameplay of bf1 and saw US doughboys running around with mp18s but all in all I still love Verdon more because of that forced weapon specialist requirement
I am glad you stuck around for the end!
great video man.!!
Thank you sir!
Wow,you research a lot. Nice video,keep it up,earned a sub.
u shod keep on doing this great job man
I see we have the same taste in videogames. Hardcore,Realistic,Tactical millitary FPSs!! Subbed!!!
Great minds think alike! Welcome to the community!
The Bearded Mitch Keep up the good work and wish you the best for the new year!!!
Great video!
By the way! MP-18 also was used in Necrovision videogame!
As a military history fanatic, I agree with idea of weapon wars. Congratulations, you just got a new sub
Fuck yes bruh. I don't care about how often you upload but keep cranking out these types of vids.
Could I please see the verdun madsen vs the bf1 madsen?
Thank you for the suggestion, that has a very high possibility
of being in one of these videos.
Guys, don't just dislike the video just because your game didn't win. Obviously he spent hours editing this video and put a lot of time in it.
Thanks for sticking up for the video and recognizing the amount of editing that go into these. With opinion videos though people are going to disagree so dislikes are bound to happen.
keep this series goin
Love is keep the series going
I will, thanks for watching!
For some reason you showed up In my feed, but I'm glad you did cause I can see this series going somewhere. I recommend putting more of a presence to your voice, compartmentalizing and categorizing the different parts of your review, shortening and sweetening each category, and plainly choosing the winner of a category instead of using a 5 star system.
I also recommend comparing both runners against their real life model as the goal to Reach, then comparing the 2 In different categories to see which one "wins". To showcase the real weapons, I recommend reaching out to other RUclips channels who specialize in showcasing and/Or shooting these weapons, and using their footage as a real example. (Maybe you could set up a partnership or guest star deal with one of the larger gun channels? Profit!)
All in all, pretty good video; But a bit long, quiet, and dry.
Check out some other "VERSUS" type videos from other channels to get a sense of what works and what doesn't.
Hey Jack,
Thanks for the kind words and the well thought out critiques and suggestions. I will definitely try to implement some of this. Thanks again!
We all do respect, but in bf1 it can be presumed that the soldiers the players play as are not just "regular" soldiers. Not only can it be seen with their resources, such as tanks, but also by the gold buttons on their cuffs. As a result maybe it is acceptable to see them using expensive and experimental gear.
Very good point that I did not think of Salty. I very much appreciate this kind of thought-out comment!
Verdun with BF1 Graphics would be beautiful.
Someone added this gun to Fallout 4 called the Defense Gun. You can change/modify it in a lot of ways, it can even turn into a "Sten" based on what you add/remove from it. The Max Upgraded version of it, looks pure MP18 though. Pretty much the mod adds a Gun to Fallout 4 that can turn into the MP18, or SPGs similar to the MP18, ie copies of the MP18.
Sup Mitch, as a dutch guy who learned a bit of German in school, i just wanted to in form you that the weird B like figure (ringgel S in dutch) is actually pronounced as a sharp S (weird i know). also the German language is a very sharp language, with unusual pronunciation. maybe google some tips on that. I hope this helps in future verdun videos. I sure hope to see them!
Good video lad! Got yourself a new sub. Still make it some shorter like 7 to 12 or so. anyway keep making this fine content
For me both game are amazing!
great video
The dice team stated that they didn't want to recreate multiplayer word for word WW1, but to put WW1 history with modern combat.
i can see your channel growing in 2017
Nice Video. I like your opinion and think about it just like you.
Battlefield 1 really started getting fun to me, when I hit max rank on everything, and kept using only weapons from the factions I'm playing as, it gives much more variety and different ecperiences. I am just waiting for a gamemode or custom game option, combined with a map, that allows for much more true combat, and I wouldn't mind them taking notes from Verdun at all. The only thing I can say that differs these weapons alot is Verdun's stiff movement all around, and the sound as adressed in the video.
loved this video
The burst fire and sights actually did exist and were experimented with. Although most didn't see combat they were real. And historically accurate
2:33 You mean the AK is a crude version of the STG.
Loved the video!
In my opinion, Battlefield 1 is for the shear awesomeness of all out war, and Verdun is for trench warfare and historical accuracy.
Sound should be 0.5 for historical accuracy on verdun.
Remember when the Verdun MP18 had a consistent fire rate and didn't just fire at whatever speed it felt like?
You may not know this but the mp18 mags were actually originally made for the p08 luger
I remember when the MP18 was first put into verdun...I became king of the MP18... I never saw anyone else who was able to land headshots on flanders from across no mans land.
for this series to be successful you need to reevaluate your criteria. Why is accuracy something that needs comparing? Not historical accuracy, but just accuracy? It's kind of the odd one out in your criteria. If you're going to talk about accuracy then why not damage, handling, reload speed, etc?
Also, when you go into historical accuracy and then completely ignore the most obvious factors, such as the way the gun is held, it takes away from any validity. The whole "since when is this a thing" argument is bullshit too. Either present evidence or don't bring it up.
There's potential here, but work on your criteria, make sure your information is presented in a logical and structured method, and don't waste time on irrelevant points.
Thank you for the feedback!
Yeah, maybe make some categories like that
Earned a Sub!
Welcome to the community BirdMania!
The Bearded Mitch 🖒
I would suggest to do some shots of the two guns side by side while comparing things. I know you want to focus on both guns in their own section but maybe on the second one doing shots back to the other gun sounds/looks/accessibility would be good. For instance when you were test firing the MP18 for sound in BF1, a little snippet of the MP18 in Verdun firing after to compare would be nice.
Good video, but I have to say this: BF1 is not supposed to be a 100% accurate war simulator. I think that BF1 is WWI inspired.
"they made the mp18 sound weaker than the rest of the guns" well of course like you said it only fires 9mm
Smacking a bayonet on a mp18 with whatever they had to stick stuff to other stuff in ww1 wasn't a thing?
Was never designed or produced from factory that way. I put tape on my ACOG in Afghanistan so the sight would not be over saturated with light. So while the ACOG was an official or sanctioned attachment for the M4 my black tape was not....
The Bearded Mitch The dirt, wear and tear, etc. also weren't from the factory, and i'm pretty sure the drum mag was also seperate, as it came with 8 round magazines for the pistol they were using at the time.
False equivalency, dirt, wear and tear, etc. aren't something you put on the weapon. Also, the 32 round TM 08 mag for the MP 18 was issued with the weapon, however the 8 round pistol magazine was also compatible.
Nani Sore No, I remember hearing that the drum was originally made for the pistol, and the 8 round was what came with the MP18. Like how if you buy an AUG you get the 30 round mag and not the 42 round mag, unless you buy the 42 round mag.
Some Weeb What you're thinking of is the Lange Pistole 08, or the Artillery Luger, which was made for German artillerymen to defend themselves. The 8 round and 32 round magazines were compatible with it. That said I'd like to correct myself on my earlier statement. After looking into a bit more, the MP 18 is not compatible with 8 round pistol magazines, any pictures you see of an MP 18 with straight box magazines are post world war 1 variants where it has a 20 or 30 straight box magazine, during World War 1 the MP 18 was only issued with the TM 08 32 round drum magazine.
I think for future episodes you could compare each game's gun together for each category, and then recap at the end, like you could compare how accurate the MP-18 is in BF1 and Verdun back to back, then move to the next category. Otherwise, viewers will forget what you were talking about. Plus it would probably help shorten the video a bit, not that length is a problem.
I'm guessing the dislikes were from Battlefield fanboys who's can't accept the fact that Battlefield 1 is laughable when it comes to historical accuracy.
Stealthygunner X The dislikes are probably from Verdun players telling everybody how historically accurate their game is and how awesome it is while other people don't care because it is not their cup of tea. Meanwhile the Verdun player (not everyone of you luckily) stays on his high horse, sees his God being compared to a game in a similar setting and gets offended it.
Yes Verdun is far more historically accurate, but it is a video game. A video game is supposed to be fun in which aspect Battlefield absolutely trumps Verdun. You want historical accuracy, read a book about WWI or wait for a very good story mode for a ww1 game, not just 9v9 battles
Battlefield 1 is laughable in general its not fun
Mountain Dew MLG Superstar Can't take that seriously with someone who has the name MLG Superstar
Mountain Dew MLG Superstar Not fun for you, but many people enjoy it.
Stealthygunner X Battlefield has never been historically accurate, you'd be a fucking idiot to think that dice was aiming for accuracy.
The mp18 might have an rof beat by every other automatic weapon today and a low caliber bullet but it was devastating in its time
why do the soldiers on bf1 even hold the gun at the magazine? they could just put dynamite into it if they wanted to destroy it.
Or shit in the barrel
Your in luck on the sounds! The devs eventual plan on teaming up with C&Rsenal to create better weapon sounds.
Great Idea!
Thanks Kabel!
I have no problems with this video, but keep in mind, BF1 is an arcade shooter (don't act like it isn't, it is) while verdun is a more hardcore, realistic shooter, so there are some discrepancies, in short don't get mad pls about either of these games
Well said!
I wish Battlefield 1 had fraction based weaponary and vehicles. It would make it so much more authentic.
great vid but a bit drawn out, could you do it with 10 mins??
It is still early, but I am trying to stream line. I am glad you enjoyed it!
Just by looking at the sights of the gun, getting a sense of its recoil and cumbersome nature to most soldiers who were new to SMGs, you can tell that Battlefield 1 cannot hold a candle when compared to Verdun.
This is true all across the board. Verdun has wonderful core-gameplay which is makes for a much better outline of the First World War. Battlefield 1 is nothing but fancy graphics, some senseless glitz to take focus away from the truly important stuff by purveying an utterly useless array of attachments and gun models that shouldn't be there in the first place, when the sights, recoil, feel and ballistics of the guns are all over the place...
If you need a true game, go for Verdun or Day of Infamy or Rising Storm... otherwise, go fun yourself in some arcade slum.
A Great Year Of 2017 To All!
You have to remember about bf1 is that you need to take in to account that it's made for a wider array of players rather than the realistic tactical verdun player base. Bf1 is a more casual game
Did you forget that dice has so much money but they can't animate the player pushing the fucking magazine release when reloading.
I would say for this do it like a percentage that adds up to 100% and for a game like verdun and battlefield 1 which are very historical games to make that category worth like 30%-40%, then all of the other categories will be whatever precent based on their importance
Why doesn't this have more views?
This is a great small community so it can be hard to get noticed. With that said the longer people watch, the more they like, comment, share and subscribe; the views and attention will come.
Thanks for watching and I hope you enjoyed it!
You do realize that an average/half amount of stars is 2.5 stars and not 3? 3 Stars is equivalent to 6/10, which is more than average.
Shhh, don't tell everyone my counting is off!
SMLE MK III, Springfield M1903, and Gewehr 98 all from Battlefield 1 and Verdun.
The AK-47 is the crude version of the StG-44. Not the other way around.
I think with most weapons, the original that inspired or provided the base for a new weapon could be called a crude version of the new weapon. For the STG-44 and its build quality compared to the AK-47, “crude” may be the wrong choice of words. Thanks for the comment!
STG-44 did provide inspiration for the AK. But not really a crude version since they are mechanically so different.