The combination of 3X speed faster than sound and ability to fly in low altitude+ ability to change trajectory makes Brahmos the undoubtedly the most accurate lethal cruise missile in present stage 💀
Everybody wants to have brahmos because in this ago India shows his capabilities by hitting a target inside the Pakistan and Pakistan had all the Chinese equipments which can intercept incoming missiles but the wire sitting duck and could not shoot down one single brahmos missile
@@kentony7672 maybe but imagine the cost of intercept thousands of those missile, still no air defence can shot down every single piece. Pakistan could not shot down even 1 though they had letest çhiniese air defence system a
@@kentony7672 don't forget the curvature of earth 🌍 and raders in big destroyer class warships easily detect and destroy any missile including cruise missile that's why selvo mode is required atleast 15-20 enough for any floating ship
Made in India & Russia... I wonder how the US feels about the Philippines buying this missile. US don't want us to buy high tech missiles like this and they call them friend.
I’ll be honest, I’m not sure why the US has an aversion to supersonic cruise missiles. Cost is one possibility, it’s also possible that the people in charge of procurement felt that supersonic cruise missiles were unnecessary, given the types of opponents that the US has been facing for the last 30ish years
But Typhon weapon system has Tomahawk missile and the speed of Tomahawk missile is 913 km/h. Which is easy to detect and shoot down compared to Brahmos. It is impossible to shoot down Brahmos because the speed of Brahmos is 3450 km/h. And the speed of Brahmos-2 is 9800 km/h.
@@Ronaldo-wr5pk But Brahmos only has a range of 310 miles and Tomahawk block 5 has a range of over 1000 miles. Typhon can also use SM-6. Both systems will go good together for Philippines.
@@everypitchcounts4875 India also has Brahmos missile with a range of 900 km. But India can't sell long range brahmos to Philippines because Philippines is not a member of MTCR (Missile Technology Control Regime). And the range of 900 km is enough to target ships in South China Sea. And SM-6 is not an anti-ship missile.
@@everypitchcounts4875BrahMos is fire and forget missile, it can chase the target and can move wherever target moves, it fly very low, it has stealth feature as well so it's impossible to detect and shoot down BrahMos. India's Sukhoi30 Mki is armed with BrahMos and Su30Mki has 3500 km range plus 900km BrahMos range. It is nightmare to aircraft carrier.
You know it's a quality product when their sales pitch is "it really works, you can see videos of it working on the internet". That's definitely the exact same sales pitch Lockheed uses to sell F-35s to other countries. "The plane flies, there are lots of videos of it flying available on the internet."
You know its a quality product even when the weapon is fired accidentally during an exercise, it still turns and heads right into enemy territory and defeats all enemy Air Defences to the point that even the enemy puts out official statements corroborating the same. Happened couple of years ago, and Pakistan's Chinese-origin Air Defences could only sit and watch as they got bested.
because it's constantly evolving , even he mentioned about latest version will delivered. Being in service from 2005 indicates how much time did it got to be completely error free , mature & reliable .
in 2005 I was the best in the world, new models got upgrade like new more sensetive sensor, faster booster, light weight composite material, flying pattern has changed now it fly wayy closer to ground etc So still in 2024 it's the best, also militry equipments are not like smartphone that gets old in 1yr, look at F22 it's still the best
It’s a 1990s Russian missile with a new seeker. Kinematically it’s yesterdays news and is still active radar when the best in class are IIR with target recognition. I’ve still no idea what gives it a land attack role as antiship radar isn’t discriminating enough, at those frequencies, for resolution to hit point targets ashore. See all the issues Russia has had trying to use Oniks (the baseline version of BrahMos) against shore targets in Ukraine. I know it’s a big thing for India and you love to wave the flag, but, it’s not the best anything.
@@SteveJones-om6ks i really don't think it's the best thing India ever made or something Also you said IIR, well that missile has range of 300kms or 186mil there is no IIR sensor that can track the target that far Also I get ur point that you think missiles should have stealth capabilities that's western thinking but russian thinking is you make missile so fast if even you detect it still you can't do anything. It flys at mach 2.8 almost 2x faster than bullet
@@Shubham_Bahirat I agree I think that India has made far more impressive technology than this. In both cases IIR and radar the seeker is only active in missile terminal phase. The BrahMos seeker was good for about 50km originally I dont know whether that’s been upgraded but you don’t really need more. Radar horizon effects would limit range for a low flying weapon anyway. Problem with the speed is it only offers advantage if you pick the missile up late. Oniks/BrahMos has to fly high altitude in mid course to get standoff range. Without stealth its detected so far off, even with the speed, that there is plenty of time to activate defences and at least 3 naval SAMs I’m aware of have been successfully tested against Coyote drones simulating BrahMos terminal phase speed and height. It’s by no means useless, the range of the weapon means it denies a lot of sea space to anyone not equipped to deal with the weapon. Time has moved on though and it is showing its Cold War roots.
It's named after celestial weapon of Ancient Indian history called 'Bramhastra' which was known for never missing it's target and having 0 counter measure against it . Even sir Oppenheimer admitted it being one of the first nuclear weapon . But yeah it was like thousands of years ago
@@ancientwarrior2374 Not exactly, but close. The missile is named after the Brahmaputra and Moskva rivers. Then again, the Brahmaputra is named after Lord Brahma, and the Brahmastra is the weapon he would have possessed.
@@ancientwarrior2374 Bramhastra was one of most destructive, powerful, irresistible weapons & termed as a fiery that creates a fierce fireball, blazing up with terrible flames & countless horrendous thunder flashes, When discharged, all nature including trees, oceans, animals tremble, The sky surrounds with flame, glaciers melt, mountains shatter with copious noise all around but It wasn't greatest one, It was created by Brahma along with its more powerful variants Brahmashirā astra. What u talking as said by Oppenheimer as first nuclear weapon was most likely Brahmashira not bramhastra. Bramhastra described target centric, can destroy a powerful enemy if they doesn't possess an alternate counter weapon (e.g, Brahma danda, a weapon of self-defence, only be possessed by Brahmanas & its powers are dependent on its owner, Its like a rod capable of absorbing any incoming attack towards its owner. When Vishvamitra in a fit of anger, unleashed Brahmastra onto Vasishtha, it was his Brahmdanda that protected him from lethal bramhastra) Whereas Brahmashirā astra described 4times stronger than normal bramhastra, causes chain reactions of massive explosions & waves to annihilate any desired entity of the Universe or even the Universe itself, it causes collateral damage to every useful resource in a given area & prevents even a single blade of grass from ever growing in that area for next 50 brahma yrs. It's mentioned that there would be no rainfall for 12 Brahma yrs (12 Brahma yrs = 37.32 trillion human yrs) and climate conditions will worsen. The strike of Brahmashirā astra will eventually destroy everything, it's said that when this invoked, "It blazes up with terrible flames within a huge sphere of fire, Numerous peals of thunder heard, fissures start on earth, rivers become dry, 1000s of meteors fell & all living creatures became terrified with great dread. The entire sky seemed filled with noise, assumed a terrible aspect with flames of fire. The whole earth with her mountains, waters, trees trembled". Its true power is able to annihilate someone's existence from past, present and future making their existence impossible to be imagined in any facet or form because they did not exist & will not exist
@@ancientwarrior2374 It was probably Brahmashirā astra (more powerful variant of brahmastra) its 4 time powerful than normal brahmastra, Also Brahmastra described as target-centric while Brahmashira is weapon said with qualities of similar destruction & after effects when invoked as tonnes of most powerful nukes, So i think it was this weapon that Oppenheimer said as first Nk weapon and not brahmastra
@@KiingOfKombat Is it? India has already tested BrahMos with Indian solid rocket booster, Indian seeker and Indian ramjet engine. This has been stated officially by the Government of India. Only reason India still imports parts from Russia is the workshare agreement and because unlike China, India does not renege on contracts.
Reality is brhamos hypersonic cruise missille have already been developed by india.. but india is not ready to sell this missile system to other countries
The BrahMos, as of now, is supersonic, and is capable of flying at just under Mach 3. The hypersonic variant is Brahmos II, but that is still in the works.
The outcome will not change. China spanks India so hard in the 1962 war that Indians are still having nightmares because of it in the 21st century. For example, Jaishankar, India's Foreign Minister, cried "We lost the 1962 war against China".
mach5 would be spine chilling for any nation taking out radar in play and even if it catches 5*320m/s we would have gone 1.5km from last point in a flash good luck with radars 😂😂
0:12 Supersonic but not HYPERSONIC says it all 🤭🤣😂😅Only big boys like Russia/USA/China and probably UK/France have hypersonic missiles and only these big boys have the most feared weapon in history, the hydrogen bomb. India does not have these technologies
You must be watching lots of Hollywood movies 😅😅😅😅😅..USA with all the western allies couldn't defeat afganistan... you people are shameless... you need to study geopolitical books rather than going to strip clubs or getting high and watching those bullshit Hollywood movies..😅😅😅😅😅
@@sahasrangshuchanda7214 China spanks India so hard in the 1962 war that Indians are still having nightmares because of it in the 21st century. For example, Jaishankar, India's Foreign Minister, cried "We lost the 1962 war against China". 😅🤣😂
@@sahasrangshuchanda7214 ➡"Abhijit Chavda: China's century of humiliation; India's millennium of humiliation". 🔚 and this ➡General Bakshi of |ndia, 3rd highest ranking military officer of |ndia, said " We had 800 years of subjugation"..🔚🤭😅😂
India also has hydrogen bomb Just read first. And only Russia, Usa has hypersonic missiles. On the other hand no other country has it. And for your information brahmos mark 2 which is in development stage is an hypersonic missile
World's best LOL! This silly marketing notes don't work in real world. US, China have far more capable missiles. Even Russia don't use Brahmos, it uses more advance variant for itself. Brahmos has bigger RCS then most modern anti-ship missiles, it's flight altitude is higher then newer anti-ship missiles. It has huge heat signature and easily detectable.
Russia uses Onyx. The father of BrahMos. A missile with outdated avionics compared to BrahMos. Most Chinese warships use the YJ-83 missile, which is subsonic instead of supersonic like BrahMos, has the same radar cross section as BrahMos, and has lower range (only 180km when launched from surface), instead of 290 km for export BrahMos or 600 km for Indian BrahMos). And before you start with "hYpeRsONicS," let me remind you, India has also tested scramjet engines that have sustained thrusts at Mach 6. China or Russia or USA aren't the only ones working on this tech, which is yet to properly enter service at scale. Again, the primary anti-ship missile of China is still the outdated YJ-83.
What about few days ago when India launched above towards the Pakistan and they would not intersect it, they had all the Chinese defence system and US defence system and they just sit and watch the missile hit their site.... Imagine if someone fires 15 or 16 missiles together no air defence cannot stop all of them
@@heatengine9283 Mach 3 at 10000 meter altitude isn't hard for SAM to engage. Supersonic stuffs usually cruise this way to assure to reach longer distances.
@@kentony7672 The BrahMos is a sea-skimming missile. Hence, unless you can find and engage it in the early stages of flight, you now have a Mach 3 missile flying at 10 metres or lesser from ground / sea level. That is exceptionally difficult for any SAM system to engage.
@@anantr99 Besides, attackers tend to set multiple waypoints for their ashms to attack from different directions your viable range could be further limited.
@@princegroove Russia is a good friend of ours we can supply brahmos missiles if Russia wants We do have a huge stockpile of these missiles in our arsenal Range is 800 km Kiev will be a good Target to hit with the brahmos . And Intercepting these missiles will be very hard for Ukraine .
You don't understand India at all with that comment. India has never been a "friend" of any one country over others. Russia has the same tech already, it was a dual development missile with a Russian company. Russia has always had a working relationship with India as China and Pakistan are India's biggest rivals. The USA sided with Pakistan so the relationship is not as strong as it could be. Russia works hard to ensure India remains friendly. India buys weapons from both Russia and the USA and the French. India benefits from the "I'm not beholden to you" attitude.
@@warlord7803and what's the point of transferring them to Russia if it's the p800 onyx, that is, Russia has had them for a long time and why do we need Ramos if there are dagger, caliber, x 101 and zircon missiles
And with that Russia gave 51 percent stake to us…. Cry. Noon landing was also assembled in India. K6 SLBM also assembled…. Cry begger cry…. Because this weapon is for ur destruction
Ah yes, because India doesn't have other ramjet powered missiles like SFDR or STAR, right? Because India has not flight tested two different scramjet engines (DRDO HSTDV and ISRO ATV), right? At least learn to form proper lies. Your childish attempts at spreading fake news can be debunked with a mere google search.
Brahmos buy by the Philippines is the big mistake. They could have bought the U.S. HIMARS INSTEAD OF A VERY HEAVY CUMBERSOME BRAHMOS. You need an 18 wheeler heavy duty truck to haul this missiles. I doubt the truck with a load of heavy brahmos can tackle the Philippines terraines. Easy target and you cannot move and hide it. While they could have a lot of HIMARS BATTERY FOR THE PRICE THEY SPENT ON BRAHMOS. The Himars can also be used a long range rocket called ATACMS.
you are comparing two entirely different systems with entirely different attack scenarios. himars is an artillery rocket which flies at 85kmph (like a car). brahmos is a highly accurate (1mCEP) supersonic cruise missile (mach3). there's no comparison. himars is mainly meant for barrage attack on large surface areas. brahmos is for precision killing high value targets such as aircraft carriers, destroyers. if Brahmos is present, China is not going to bring their carriers in. one hit would put a carrier out of commission for months. India also has Pinaka which is comparable to HIMARS, which was sold to Armenia.
All cruise missile trucks aren't supposed to travel mountains. US arms are costly and riddled with price gouging. But if PH Brahmos only has 2 launchers per truck, then additional buys must stop, huge truck is wasted, and it takes time to reload during critical moments
Low quality weapons have been proven very effective in Ukraine war. Philippines is an isolated island nation and with enough cruiser missiles china's naval fleet would be sitting ducks.
Philippine Army will be the next one to acquire it
Philippines has already received its first 3 batteries of the system.
@@majorcarlton137 that's the Philippine Marines, the Philippine Army has a different acquisition project.
@@meeeptheconqueror6759 I stand corrected.
next procurement should be SMART when its made
I’m sure it’ll work great, just like everything else the Indians make! 😂
good luck....PH-INDIA...god bless us all....🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀
Fantastic explanation from the gentleman
The combination of 3X speed faster than sound and ability to fly in low altitude+ ability to change trajectory makes Brahmos the undoubtedly the most accurate lethal cruise missile in present stage 💀
Tejas LCA1A next locally assembled, then armed with Brahmos NG
Philippines army next user
MARINES LANG ANG GAGAMIT DI ANG ARMY IBA ANG BIBILIN NG ARMY.
Everybody wants to have brahmos because in this ago India shows his capabilities by hitting a target inside the Pakistan and Pakistan had all the Chinese equipments which can intercept incoming missiles but the wire sitting duck and could not shoot down one single brahmos missile
They're bright clear targets for HHQ9/16 while cruising.
@@kentony7672 maybe but imagine the cost of intercept thousands of those missile, still no air defence can shot down every single piece.
Pakistan could not shot down even 1 though they had letest çhiniese air defence system a
@@amitmondal4976 There is no complex terrain in open oceanic environment vessel radars are easier to acquire targets.
@@kentony7672 don't forget the curvature of earth 🌍 and raders in big destroyer class warships easily detect and destroy any missile including cruise missile that's why selvo mode is required atleast 15-20 enough for any floating ship
😂whithole system @@kentony7672
Semoga Indonesia India bisa bekerjasama untuk pembuatan rudal Brahmos dengan adanya tot
Indonesian Su30 can be equipped with Brahmos-A
Bravo!
Made in India & Russia... I wonder how the US feels about the Philippines buying this missile. US don't want us to buy high tech missiles like this and they call them friend.
I’ll be honest, I’m not sure why the US has an aversion to supersonic cruise missiles. Cost is one possibility, it’s also possible that the people in charge of procurement felt that supersonic cruise missiles were unnecessary, given the types of opponents that the US has been facing for the last 30ish years
Philippines also has the Typhon weapon system
But Typhon weapon system has Tomahawk missile and the speed of Tomahawk missile is 913 km/h. Which is easy to detect and shoot down compared to Brahmos. It is impossible to shoot down Brahmos because the speed of Brahmos is 3450 km/h. And the speed of Brahmos-2 is 9800 km/h.
@@Ronaldo-wr5pk But Brahmos only has a range of 310 miles and Tomahawk block 5 has a range of over 1000 miles. Typhon can also use SM-6. Both systems will go good together for Philippines.
@@everypitchcounts4875 India also has Brahmos missile with a range of 900 km. But India can't sell long range brahmos to Philippines because Philippines is not a member of MTCR (Missile Technology Control Regime). And the range of 900 km is enough to target ships in South China Sea. And SM-6 is not an anti-ship missile.
👍👍👍☝️☝️@@Ronaldo-wr5pk
@@everypitchcounts4875BrahMos is fire and forget missile, it can chase the target and can move wherever target moves, it fly very low, it has stealth feature as well so it's impossible to detect and shoot down BrahMos. India's Sukhoi30 Mki is armed with BrahMos and Su30Mki has 3500 km range plus 900km BrahMos range. It is nightmare to aircraft carrier.
You know it's a quality product when their sales pitch is "it really works, you can see videos of it working on the internet". That's definitely the exact same sales pitch Lockheed uses to sell F-35s to other countries. "The plane flies, there are lots of videos of it flying available on the internet."
Thanks, Wyatt
And??
And???
You know its a quality product even when the weapon is fired accidentally during an exercise, it still turns and heads right into enemy territory and defeats all enemy Air Defences to the point that even the enemy puts out official statements corroborating the same. Happened couple of years ago, and Pakistan's Chinese-origin Air Defences could only sit and watch as they got bested.
Interesting he notes it’s been in service since 2005 but also states it’s cutting edge technology.
because it's constantly evolving , even he mentioned about latest version will delivered. Being in service from 2005 indicates how much time did it got to be completely error free , mature & reliable .
in 2005 I was the best in the world, new models got upgrade like new more sensetive sensor, faster booster, light weight composite material, flying pattern has changed now it fly wayy closer to ground etc
So still in 2024 it's the best, also militry equipments are not like smartphone that gets old in 1yr, look at F22 it's still the best
It’s a 1990s Russian missile with a new seeker. Kinematically it’s yesterdays news and is still active radar when the best in class are IIR with target recognition. I’ve still no idea what gives it a land attack role as antiship radar isn’t discriminating enough, at those frequencies, for resolution to hit point targets ashore. See all the issues Russia has had trying to use Oniks (the baseline version of BrahMos) against shore targets in Ukraine.
I know it’s a big thing for India and you love to wave the flag, but, it’s not the best anything.
@@SteveJones-om6ks i really don't think it's the best thing India ever made or something
Also you said IIR, well that missile has range of 300kms or 186mil there is no IIR sensor that can track the target that far
Also
I get ur point that you think missiles should have stealth capabilities that's western thinking but russian thinking is you make missile so fast if even you detect it still you can't do anything.
It flys at mach 2.8 almost 2x faster than bullet
@@Shubham_Bahirat I agree I think that India has made far more impressive technology than this.
In both cases IIR and radar the seeker is only active in missile terminal phase. The BrahMos seeker was good for about 50km originally I dont know whether that’s been upgraded but you don’t really need more. Radar horizon effects would limit range for a low flying weapon anyway.
Problem with the speed is it only offers advantage if you pick the missile up late. Oniks/BrahMos has to fly high altitude in mid course to get standoff range. Without stealth its detected so far off, even with the speed, that there is plenty of time to activate defences and at least 3 naval SAMs I’m aware of have been successfully tested against Coyote drones simulating BrahMos terminal phase speed and height.
It’s by no means useless, the range of the weapon means it denies a lot of sea space to anyone not equipped to deal with the weapon. Time has moved on though and it is showing its Cold War roots.
Nice!
After Philippines Marine, Army will be next with talks with Vietnam & Indonesia going in advance stage
Sad news for china 💀
More missiles in Philippine armed forces
Commodore as other Indians are really good at selling products.
What about the BRAHMOS V.2 HYPERSONIC is it available already ?
not for sell bro
It's in critical design evaluation phase of it's development! Trials will start from end of 2025 expected induction 2026!
Russia won't let India sell to anyone
Indonesia delivery order to Brahmos Cruise anti ship missile on ready 🥳❤️🇮🇳🤝🇲🇨👌👍
❤💖💖🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭👏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Atmnirbhar bharat ✅❤
Sana maka gawa ren ang pinas nang nuclear heat
Brah-Boss! 👍
Brah - poj€€t😂
Brahmos? more like Bruhmos
Bruh! 😂
It's named after celestial weapon of Ancient Indian history called 'Bramhastra' which was known for never missing it's target and having 0 counter measure against it . Even sir Oppenheimer admitted it being one of the first nuclear weapon . But yeah it was like thousands of years ago
@@ancientwarrior2374 Not exactly, but close. The missile is named after the Brahmaputra and Moskva rivers. Then again, the Brahmaputra is named after Lord Brahma, and the Brahmastra is the weapon he would have possessed.
@@ancientwarrior2374 Bramhastra was one of most destructive, powerful, irresistible weapons & termed as a fiery that creates a fierce fireball, blazing up with terrible flames & countless horrendous thunder flashes, When discharged, all nature including trees, oceans, animals tremble, The sky surrounds with flame, glaciers melt, mountains shatter with copious noise all around but It wasn't greatest one, It was created by Brahma along with its more powerful variants Brahmashirā astra.
What u talking as said by Oppenheimer as first nuclear weapon was most likely Brahmashira not bramhastra. Bramhastra described target centric, can destroy a powerful enemy if they doesn't possess an alternate counter weapon (e.g, Brahma danda, a weapon of self-defence, only be possessed by Brahmanas & its powers are dependent on its owner, Its like a rod capable of absorbing any incoming attack towards its owner. When Vishvamitra in a fit of anger, unleashed Brahmastra onto Vasishtha, it was his Brahmdanda that protected him from lethal bramhastra)
Whereas Brahmashirā astra described 4times stronger than normal bramhastra, causes chain reactions of massive explosions & waves to annihilate any desired entity of the Universe or even the Universe itself, it causes collateral damage to every useful resource in a given area & prevents even a single blade of grass from ever growing in that area for next 50 brahma yrs. It's mentioned that there would be no rainfall for 12 Brahma yrs (12 Brahma yrs = 37.32 trillion human yrs) and climate conditions will worsen. The strike of Brahmashirā astra will eventually destroy everything, it's said that when this invoked, "It blazes up with terrible flames within a huge sphere of fire, Numerous peals of thunder heard, fissures start on earth, rivers become dry, 1000s of meteors fell & all living creatures became terrified with great dread. The entire sky seemed filled with noise, assumed a terrible aspect with flames of fire. The whole earth with her mountains, waters, trees trembled". Its true power is able to annihilate someone's existence from past, present and future making their existence impossible to be imagined in any facet or form because they did not exist & will not exist
@@ancientwarrior2374 It was probably Brahmashirā astra (more powerful variant of brahmastra) its 4 time powerful than normal brahmastra, Also Brahmastra described as target-centric while Brahmashira is weapon said with qualities of similar destruction & after effects when invoked as tonnes of most powerful nukes, So i think it was this weapon that Oppenheimer said as first Nk weapon and not brahmastra
🌍🌈🇵🇭❤️📘🇮🇱🕊️🔥💧❤️🙏😭
Great!
MADE in INDIA Sadhu beloved nation
🙏😄🤗
India should offer transfer of technology to the Philippines
It's on the talks now.
India offered ATAGS, Tejas MK1A, akash air defense systems and even ships for coast guard..
lol bro
Why 😂
half the technology is russian....
@@KiingOfKombat Is it? India has already tested BrahMos with Indian solid rocket booster, Indian seeker and Indian ramjet engine. This has been stated officially by the Government of India. Only reason India still imports parts from Russia is the workshare agreement and because unlike China, India does not renege on contracts.
♥️🙏❤️
Reality is brhamos hypersonic cruise missille have already been developed by india.. but india is not ready to sell this missile system to other countries
The BrahMos, as of now, is supersonic, and is capable of flying at just under Mach 3. The hypersonic variant is Brahmos II, but that is still in the works.
Unless you have insider information, Hypersonic iteration of Brahmos is not ready yet
👏👍🤙
❤❤❤❤🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
World fastest & most dangerous Cruise Missile 🔥 3 ton monster with 3.5 mach Speed. 2 Missile enough to make a Carrier sink
#MadeInIndia
The outcome will not change. China spanks India so hard in the 1962 war that Indians are still having nightmares because of it in the 21st century. For example, Jaishankar, India's Foreign Minister, cried "We lost the 1962 war against China".
India has better missiles like pralay, nag, Agni, Akash, nirbhay, Astra and drones
Indians speaks the best english...
mach5 would be spine chilling for any nation taking out radar in play and even if it catches 5*320m/s we would have gone 1.5km from last point in a flash good luck with radars 😂😂
obsolete technology from the 80s😢😂
I can feel ur frustration😂
@@jaynair3164 everything I say is 100% true🤣
@@isleephungry that's your conviction.But for us,it's a frustrated soul,wailing😀
@@jaynair3164brahmos is not even one of the best missiles in the world😂
@@jaynair3164 you believe something made by an underdeveloped country can be good 😁
China's picking the wasps best😂😂😂
Delivery is so much too long as promise
0:12 Supersonic but not HYPERSONIC says it all 🤭🤣😂😅Only big boys like Russia/USA/China and probably UK/France have hypersonic missiles and only these big boys have the most feared weapon in history, the hydrogen bomb. India does not have these technologies
You must be watching lots of Hollywood movies 😅😅😅😅😅..USA with all the western allies couldn't defeat afganistan... you people are shameless... you need to study geopolitical books rather than going to strip clubs or getting high and watching those bullshit Hollywood movies..😅😅😅😅😅
@@sahasrangshuchanda7214 China spanks India so hard in the 1962 war that Indians are still having nightmares because of it in the 21st century. For example, Jaishankar, India's Foreign Minister, cried "We lost the 1962 war against China". 😅🤣😂
@@sahasrangshuchanda7214 Shameless 105ers.
@@sahasrangshuchanda7214 ➡"Abhijit Chavda: China's century of humiliation; India's millennium of humiliation". 🔚 and this ➡General Bakshi of |ndia, 3rd highest ranking military officer of |ndia, said " We had 800 years of subjugation"..🔚🤭😅😂
India also has hydrogen bomb
Just read first. And only Russia, Usa has hypersonic missiles. On the other hand no other country has it. And for your information brahmos mark 2 which is in development stage is an hypersonic missile
World's best LOL! This silly marketing notes don't work in real world. US, China have far more capable missiles. Even Russia don't use Brahmos, it uses more advance variant for itself. Brahmos has bigger RCS then most modern anti-ship missiles, it's flight altitude is higher then newer anti-ship missiles. It has huge heat signature and easily detectable.
Russia uses Onyx. The father of BrahMos. A missile with outdated avionics compared to BrahMos.
Most Chinese warships use the YJ-83 missile, which is subsonic instead of supersonic like BrahMos, has the same radar cross section as BrahMos, and has lower range (only 180km when launched from surface), instead of 290 km for export BrahMos or 600 km for Indian BrahMos).
And before you start with "hYpeRsONicS," let me remind you, India has also tested scramjet engines that have sustained thrusts at Mach 6. China or Russia or USA aren't the only ones working on this tech, which is yet to properly enter service at scale. Again, the primary anti-ship missile of China is still the outdated YJ-83.
Damn my man you are the most glorious stupid I have encountered ever.
Yet you guys could not track it at miya channu😂😂😂
Pakistani detected opinion rejected
What about few days ago when India launched above towards the Pakistan and they would not intersect it, they had all the Chinese defence system and US defence system and they just sit and watch the missile hit their site.... Imagine if someone fires 15 or 16 missiles together no air defence cannot stop all of them
It's nothing more than a fucking sun for PLA 346 radar while cruising,which means telling HHQ9/16 come to hit me.
Doubt that. Intercepting a Mach 3 bogey is tricky for any air defense system.
@@heatengine9283 Mach 3 at 10000 meter altitude isn't hard for SAM to engage. Supersonic stuffs usually cruise this way to assure to reach longer distances.
@@kentony7672 The BrahMos is a sea-skimming missile. Hence, unless you can find and engage it in the early stages of flight, you now have a Mach 3 missile flying at 10 metres or lesser from ground / sea level. That is exceptionally difficult for any SAM system to engage.
@@anantr99 If it cruises at sea skimming altitude all the way its range would be significantly limited which is around 150 km.
@@anantr99 Besides, attackers tend to set multiple waypoints for their ashms to attack from different directions your viable range could be further limited.
Does Russia get these from India? I can imagine that the West would not be happy with that.
No, so far Russia has not procured any of these missiles.
That paper army? Who cares! 😂
@@princegroove
Russia is a good friend of ours we can supply brahmos missiles if Russia wants
We do have a huge stockpile of these missiles in our arsenal
Range is 800 km
Kiev will be a good Target to hit with the brahmos .
And Intercepting these missiles will be very hard for Ukraine .
You don't understand India at all with that comment. India has never been a "friend" of any one country over others. Russia has the same tech already, it was a dual development missile with a Russian company. Russia has always had a working relationship with India as China and Pakistan are India's biggest rivals. The USA sided with Pakistan so the relationship is not as strong as it could be. Russia works hard to ensure India remains friendly. India buys weapons from both Russia and the USA and the French. India benefits from the "I'm not beholden to you" attitude.
@@warlord7803and what's the point of transferring them to Russia if it's the p800 onyx, that is, Russia has had them for a long time and why do we need Ramos if there are dagger, caliber, x 101 and zircon missiles
Designed and manufactured in Russia, assembled in India (with the Indian flag)
Cry more😂
Cry 😭
Babe seventy percent indian parts in between 2026 it will be hundred percent now cry mulo 😂
And with that Russia gave 51 percent stake to us…. Cry. Noon landing was also assembled in India. K6 SLBM also assembled…. Cry begger cry…. Because this weapon is for ur destruction
Ah yes, because India doesn't have other ramjet powered missiles like SFDR or STAR, right? Because India has not flight tested two different scramjet engines (DRDO HSTDV and ISRO ATV), right? At least learn to form proper lies. Your childish attempts at spreading fake news can be debunked with a mere google search.
Brahmos buy by the Philippines is the big mistake.
They could have bought the U.S. HIMARS INSTEAD OF A VERY HEAVY CUMBERSOME BRAHMOS.
You need an 18 wheeler heavy duty truck to haul this missiles. I doubt the truck with a load of heavy brahmos can tackle the Philippines terraines.
Easy target and you cannot move and hide it. While they could have a lot of HIMARS BATTERY FOR THE PRICE THEY SPENT ON BRAHMOS.
The Himars can also be used a long range rocket called ATACMS.
you are comparing two entirely different systems with entirely different attack scenarios. himars is an artillery rocket which flies at 85kmph (like a car). brahmos is a highly accurate (1mCEP) supersonic cruise missile (mach3). there's no comparison. himars is mainly meant for barrage attack on large surface areas. brahmos is for precision killing high value targets such as aircraft carriers, destroyers. if Brahmos is present, China is not going to bring their carriers in. one hit would put a carrier out of commission for months. India also has Pinaka which is comparable to HIMARS, which was sold to Armenia.
@@AnoNymous-i1o india is part of BRIC(N)KS not the "free world".
Himars is a 1 rocket pod of M270 MLRS... 😂😂😂
All cruise missile trucks aren't supposed to travel mountains. US arms are costly and riddled with price gouging. But if PH Brahmos only has 2 launchers per truck, then additional buys must stop, huge truck is wasted, and it takes time to reload during critical moments
Do you suggest Brahmos be put on Ph warships? If so, bad idea
Hahaha indian bramos only Philippines costumer because of law quality hahahaha
Cry about it 😢😢😂
ahahaha cry baby
Made in china it's low quality its quantity😂
Low quality weapons have been proven very effective in Ukraine war. Philippines is an isolated island nation and with enough cruiser missiles china's naval fleet would be sitting ducks.
Don't promote Indian Products. avoid Indian Products.
Mind explaining why?
Haters have the only explanation called hate.
because he's on Chinese payroll
Rusia
cry