Watch the first part of the podcast here: ruclips.net/video/aIpUlo9rWJA/видео.html Since I couldn't check my information before, I made some factual errors. For example, Cairo wasn't yet built in 929 and al-Ghazali died in 1111. Also, I generalized things, obviously, but that's to get a point across.
@@syedahmed8650 in democracy it’s the ruling based on the people if there is a majority against Scharia they could easily change some ahkam and that’s unacceptable and not Allowed in Sure Yusuf you will find that the Judgement is only for Allah meanwhile in democracy’s the Judgement is by the people
@@OnkelKurac That’s a very simplified understanding of democracy that is not in line with how modern democracies work. In a modern democracy: 1) only citizens can be elected for legislation 2) There is a scope to what laws can be made guarded by the Judiciary who can strike down laws or bills as unconstitutional no matter what the majority states. If after all this, Muslims want to amend the constitution that mandates only Islam- then the least of your worries is about governance.
Eyup, just going to add my perspective of things during the Russia-Ukraine war outbreak from someone who accessed Western media. I felt that the defense of Ukraine was so unanimously supported by the West broadly because of the reputation Appeasement has since a near century ago. Crimea suddenly was reminiscent of the Anschluss, Invasion of Ukraine proper; annexation of Sudetenland. If we were to learn from the mistakes from our history, then judging by what appeasement may have led to, perhaps this time it was indeed better to nip it in the bud now rather than risk global escalation etc.
Hey I know this is an old video, but I just want to say I love your work so much, though your view of democracy is ridiculous, thank you for all the great content you post
That said, I did not enjoy the part about Russia towards the end. It's disregarding the oppression and fear that Russias neighbours have lived under as "Russophobia". There's a reason why countries like the baltics, Poland and Ukraine are so much more anti-russian than say France and Germany. We didn't portray Russia as much a villain as Russia decided that we, it's neighbours, are nothing but its "sphere of influence" and that our foreign politics and relations essentially are not our own to decide. It's blatant imperialism and we want nothing to do with it.
I agree with that. Maybe I didn't put it right. I didn't mean that Russophobia isn't justified. From time to time, it was very justified (not always but often). I meant that it's been portrayed in propaganda very clearly which is why Russian Imperialism is much easier for us to see and to protest against than American Imperialism. We were talking about language and PR so, that's what I meant.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT I think this point is correct. There is a bit of a double standard when we (America) deprive people of their self determination in the name of our interests, but censure nations like Russia for doing the same. Btw, found your channel via Vicky 3. Great content. History-buff RUclips is really missing a perspective like this.
5:19 as a person trained in engineering, my recent interest in history got me thoroughly confused in the beginning because you could find reports of events (reports are biased by reporter) and then you need to build a story from it to understand (that is biased by myself). So, how to find "true" history? There is no such thing. It is what your best guess is based on given information, and will change with new info. Like he said, you pick "arbitrary" side based on what you think the theme is when clear information is not available. Even in present day if you ask someone why he did something, he will give one reason, others may give another reason, your own understanding may give yet another reason. The reason you choose to accept will determine the overall narrative. Its messy and therefore must not be used as a basis to ever attack others today in any manner. There is a lot of hidden opinions in history, let alone current affairs.
It is absurd to think that Islam can be like Christianity and Judaism when it it comes to opting for culture or ethnicity without religion. The biggest problem here is that there will rise up one group who are able to claim a monopoly on the culture or ethnicity. As a culture or ethnicity, those who choose to become Muslim by taking their shahaada will feel alienated due to their non-Arab or non-Asian ethnicity. You often hear the phrase, 'I am an atheist Jew.' The next logical question would be what does that mean? Is this why Ethiopian Jews are discriminated against by their European brothers? Will Islam end up becoming a culture or ethnicity where membership is decided upon by birth only, rather than choice and belief? With regards to homosexuality or alcohol or idolatry, if these are things that you wish to pursue, then simply opt-out. There is no compulsion in Islam, but please do not take efforts to corrupt the religion for your selfish desires. Islam has never tolerated homosexuality and the punishment is clear. However, that being said, no Muslim will sneak into your bedroom to out you or condemn you as an individual. As a Muslim, we understand that the creation is imperfect in their actions, not their creation. Allah is perfect. We are not. I don't know of any Muslim who discusses his bedroom or private affairs. Although there are many Muslims who watch porn, I have never heard discussions about it. It is simply not important what you do behind closed doors because that is between you and Allah. That is the Muslim belief. Your viewers who have questions about Islam and the treatment of Homosexuality, should watch Hamza Yusef on this subject here: ruclips.net/video/iXRnWTB2FRg/видео.html
the clergy at the orders of the dynasties with a few exceptions does not represent individuals not affiliated to the dynasties by blood ties, in other words it does not represent the majorities since it is paid by the minorities (the dynasties again Once!). one will perhaps search all eternity without finding any allusion to the principle of a dynastic power ruling the life of the Muslims in this world. this strangely resembles what was happening in Europe before the century of revolutions also known as "The Age of Enlightenment": Church and Monarchy agreeing to dominate those who had not joined the Church and those who were not from Royal blood. it is this "revolutionary" century that will bring democracy to Europe but in fact it is just a rediscovery or an update of this concept developed by ancient Greece (it looks like the story of Thales from Miletus and electricity): discovery here and a few centuries later rediscovery there and men have the impression of having progressed!
I just wanna say I watched the whole Video and as a Tradtionalist Sunni Muslim with Hanafi Maturidi background I think this Tawil that some people try with Lut as is very very problematic and unacceptable. And Scharia >> Communism :* I suggest you to read Said Qutbs works inshaa allah you seem pretty chilled but Communism is just like Liberal Democracy against Islamic Values we have our own Superior System that we need to embrace and teach our Children to build again such great Empires like Al Andalus the Ottomans Moguls Seljuks and so on
Democracy is kufr. The idea of ijma’ is not the same as democracy. The scholars dont decide on something and then ask for other scholars to show a raise of hand if they agree😂 The scholars each look at the source material with their years of knowledge and experience, then they base a judgement according to quran and sunnah (daleel) If scholars accept that the daleel (evidence) is in line with an opinion, they accept it and thats heat becomes ijma. For example, it is ijma’ that one cannot marry his mother. Something that is definitive.
How is two Indian kings fighting among themselves similar to a central asian warlord coming and establishing a dynasty? Isn't he a invader given he brings with him a completely foreign culture,traditional and civilization values which in case of Indian king conquering his rivals land would not happen atleast it wont be foreign since their origins would be same.
@@muazzamshaikh2049culture is not just about religion, they also brought in the culture of barbarism the culture of treating women as objects and treating them as winning trophy, this didn't happen in india, common didn't use to suffer in war of 2 kings, megasthenese also confirmed that, some exceptions are like marathas, they didn't follow this culture of principles, they even Ray ped Bengali Hindu women
I want to question your Islamic beliefs are you identify a Muslim Believer or a country Muslim you'll never have any problem is the Muslim belief that religion over but keep their traditions and second question do you believe Islam through all because you're born Muslim
To grant gazhali all that infamy is a stretch. There was also the year without summer in there where near global harvests collapased from global weather change from meteorite contributing to expansionist pressures and part of cause of the first plague
37:30 Bruh. As someone from the balkans, I _really_ don't get why people are making that comparison. To me it's only because russian troops are the one doing the marching so of course the US is up in arms but can't pull the usual bomb the target into nonexistence stratagem. I mean, they only liberated Kosovo to place troops there essentially.(But hey, I'll take them over the serbs) Regardless, Ukraine is no better off than us. It's an ex communist country whose politics, economy, corruption and general future outlook were shit. Just like the rest of us eastern europeans. Hell, Russia might've had a semi dictatorship but Ukraine certainly was no flourishing democracy(if that even exists). The two countries weren't that different, pre war at least. Heroic resistance, sure. Fountain of freedom and democracy? Hah. No. Funny how the media spins it.
Very sad to see your true colors.May Allah guide us all in the true path. My dear Muslim brothers and sisters, if you need to understand islamic history then you need to learn from reputable islamic historians.I suggest historians like usthaz Adnan Rashid,Dr stef keris, Dr Abdullah Haqim quick, Dr uthman lateef to enhance your islamic history and love towards islam. Iam unsubscribing from this channel.
I would agree but sadly, the Indus Valley isn't that well-studied for a number of reasons, with the biggest being that their language hasn't been deciphered.
Why are all murtads monstrously hideous looking? This guy should really consider a strictly voice only appearance on all form of media and try to stay home as much as possible in the real world. It would be a kind gesture to those with sight.
@@urooj09 "Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx
@@AlMuqaddimahYT While I certainly don't agree with your view of democracy (they might be taking issue with your Islam though lol), I won't unsubscribe. Your channel gives valuable information in an impartial manner and we need more of that. When we disagree we should engage with eachother even more, rather than shun one another and lead to further division. We're all sharing this globe together, whether we like it or not. All the best, man.
@@722georgetonorge I respect that and I thank you for respecting me enough to disagree with me without hating me. Of course, you're on this channel, not to hear my opinions but to learn Islamic history and I appreciate that you can separate the two. Many can't. Cheers.
Wallahi! Islam will fight back and your liberal agenda to reform Islam will fall flat on its face, Islam will never reform till the day of judgement, i too was a so called liberal muslim a few years back, but Alhamdulillah Allah ﷻ brought me back and opened my eyes, I'm still fighting some of the liberal inclinations i had acquired through social conditioning and Inshallah I'll overcome them too.
@@CCCP_Again you're suffering from dunning--kruger it seems, do you really think one will need to act to talk about something as petty as what a liberal is? Or you're projecting your incompetence on others? Now i have to prove whether i know what a liberal is to someone who's most probably an exhibit A liberalised progressive distorter of religion?
Syawish, though you are doing some good. You should not have let your pride in your research overtake reason, you should not try to liberalize peoples' interpretations on the religion of islam. If you are reasonable you'd see the damage this can do; there is a difference between a "secular perspective" and a "liberal perspective" on not just history, you're doing more damage than you think by pushing this narrative and attitude towards your religion, to yourself and others in the akhira.
Everybody loves the Reformation but somehow they forget the Thirty Years' War. I can understand rulers in other places not wanting to unleash that kind of chaos in their realms.
pakistan is a islamic republic we do have democracy but we exclude religious minorities like the christians and many many other religious groups we need not to deny this this is a thing and it is wrong and i want a batter pakistan where every one is equal like europe no matter if they are a woman part of the lgbtq community i hope we get that pakistan one day
I do not agree that colonialism is the prerequisite to democracy: watch sweden and finland who are not colonial nations but are the most prosper democracies in the world
Sweden had colonies in Africa and the Caribbean, and aside from that they also colonized the countries around the baltic sea, such as Estonia and Finland. Finland specifically has basically been a colonized country for most of their history, first by the Swedes, and then by the Russians.
I meant that wealth is the only thing that makes democracies look like they're working but they're actually not. Sweden did partake a bit in colonialism but even if we say that it didn't, it didn't exist in a vacuum in Europe and was interacting with colonial states, which was a factor to it obtaining wealth as well.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT What do you think is the best system to replace democracy? You have a bust of Marx apparently, but you didn't say much about communism. You don't seem to support theocracy either, so I'm curious as to whether you have a preferred system. Thanks for any response, also it's fun to finally put a face to the voice. Cheers!
@@722georgetonorge My views on Democracy are the same as I guess Winston Churchill's were. It's the worst system of government except all the other systems. We should keep it around because we don't have a better one but many people believe it to be an ideal system and try to dispense it around the world. Many Eastern countries are judged for their lack of democracy as if democracy is the standard of human wellbeing, it's not.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Ah, well if that's the case then I misunderstood and couldn't agree more. I guess our other exchange over respectfully disagreeing isn't as relevant now haha. Anyway, thanks for the reply, I've never talked to a celebrity before... I'm gonna have to write me mum about this one. Have a good one man!
I don't think changing Islam to fit Ourselves will Fix our Problems itll only Cause new divisions nd Problems We better Look at the Problems separately in every single matter nd should fix them as that A Simple problem not As "The whole religion is holding us back" type of Action My Friend if u dont know enough about Religion its fine but dont say " Its about time we change it nd become Like all other people of the book " our Religion is perfect we r not Our Prophet was Perfect our Leaders R Not Our idea of Ummah is perfect our ways to be it r not If Islam was being implemented in all the lands where Ummaht-Ul-Muslima was we would hv a lot of peace amongst ourselves but its not😔😔😔😔
I am disappointed that he said Democracy isn't a good way to govern,what alternative he has for a better way? As (i think Churchill said) democracy is a bad way to govern but it's the best we have....
The best defense for democracy is "there are no alternatives". If that's the case then we should stop holding it to such high standards and consider it a benchmark for "civilized" nations.
@@danielslubski1028 tyranny or anarchy, i am a brazilian if democracy was a system that is just false and hollow why this madness man want destroy the democracy? i am every day worry about a dictatorship ,why the people don't se the important of democracy?this video give a small answer is a servant thinking
@@nicolasferreira1146 the sad thing about Democracy is that you need the population to be above certain level of education and tolerance for Democracy to work,most Muslim countries are not there,and definitely no Arab country.(maybe Algeria or Tunisia?)
Syawish A Rahman brother am becoming a fan of your knowledge. I mean I myself do lot of research, but still am no where near the depth you have. I always wanted to be in such company, grow my knowledge and experience and be able to judge things going on these days. I want to do something for people, become an eyeopener through influencing them. If someone could guide me the method of studying 📚 and doing research, without getting into degree curriculum 📜 .
The figures used in history books such as Tabari, waqidi, etc. are totally out of proportion. In the first twenty years of the so called Muslim conquest over 5 millions are supposed to have been killed by Muslims! Ditto, the Tigers turning red due to Hulago armies slaughter is just someone trying to be dramatic.
I don't agree with some of the things but overall its good history. As for the lgbt post, you stated only facts about the history of Islam and how it had its clashes with homosexuality but at the same time in shariah law LGBT is completely forbidden. No compromise at all
Hi love your work not sure if you will respond to this but if you do that conversation about Pakistani identity struck very hard. Millions of people including myself had ancestors who left for Pakistan from India 80 years ago and simply are left with a Pakistani identity. Unlike yourself as a Punjabi or Sindhi etc. As a muhajir I feel that if I don’t see myself as a Pakistani then I am no one whereas others in Pakistan who didn’t migrate at least have their ethnic groups identity. The only way for us to feel we belong is if all Pakistanis regardless of ethnicity throw away their heritage as you suggested which at some level feels wrong. Perhaps muhajir is an identity in itself.
I don't know very much about Mujahirs and how they feel about their identities but I have heard that Muhajirs have felt excluded from society. Pakistan's ideology really did not do anything to help create a new identity and preserving the old ones. We were expected to leave our identities and become "Pakistani" so, I do believe that what's been done to groups such as Muhajir is wrong.
I think In Pakistan Societal reformation is underway, The fact that people claim they are Muslims and then doing things on the contrary is the testimony of majority being fasiq and munafiqs. Pakistan suffers more with individual corruption and doesn't strive to be more righteous. Moreover, I think Moududi gives lots of literature on political Islam.
Best islamic explaining channel... Here they discuss and explian the internal and external problems of islamic faith and its community....othet than glorifying and defending it, Keep going...
I was surprised that you didn't mention the Mutzilla or the Quranists or Avicenna when asked about reform in Islam. The current version of Islam IS kind of a reform but a conservative one by Al Ghazali and his patron caliph. And I learned that from you in the Mehna video. Also you mention the internet and colonialism but not your own video on the printing press, the thing which greatly helped the protestant reform.
Watch the first part of the podcast here: ruclips.net/video/aIpUlo9rWJA/видео.html
Since I couldn't check my information before, I made some factual errors. For example, Cairo wasn't yet built in 929 and al-Ghazali died in 1111. Also, I generalized things, obviously, but that's to get a point across.
Can u start a channel dedicated to indian history alone from antiquity to modern era
وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ Sure Maida 44
based
What does that have to do with democracy?
@@syedahmed8650 in democracy it’s the ruling based on the people if there is a majority against Scharia they could easily change some ahkam and that’s unacceptable and not Allowed in Sure Yusuf you will find that the Judgement is only for Allah meanwhile in democracy’s the Judgement is by the people
@@OnkelKurac
That’s a very simplified understanding of democracy that is not in line with how modern democracies work. In a modern democracy: 1) only citizens can be elected for legislation 2) There is a scope to what laws can be made guarded by the Judiciary who can strike down laws or bills as unconstitutional no matter what the majority states.
If after all this, Muslims want to amend the constitution that mandates only Islam- then the least of your worries is about governance.
So rashduns were Kaffiers?
an intellectually entertaining convo. would love to see a video on the Deccan Sultanates like Bijapur, Golconda, etc
Eyup, just going to add my perspective of things during the Russia-Ukraine war outbreak from someone who accessed Western media. I felt that the defense of Ukraine was so unanimously supported by the West broadly because of the reputation Appeasement has since a near century ago. Crimea suddenly was reminiscent of the Anschluss, Invasion of Ukraine proper; annexation of Sudetenland. If we were to learn from the mistakes from our history, then judging by what appeasement may have led to, perhaps this time it was indeed better to nip it in the bud now rather than risk global escalation etc.
Hey I know this is an old video, but I just want to say I love your work so much, though your view of democracy is ridiculous, thank you for all the great content you post
I rarely listen to podcasts/interviews, but this was very enjoyable and interesting to listen to. Great discussion and very enlightening.
- a swede
That said, I did not enjoy the part about Russia towards the end. It's disregarding the oppression and fear that Russias neighbours have lived under as "Russophobia". There's a reason why countries like the baltics, Poland and Ukraine are so much more anti-russian than say France and Germany.
We didn't portray Russia as much a villain as Russia decided that we, it's neighbours, are nothing but its "sphere of influence" and that our foreign politics and relations essentially are not our own to decide. It's blatant imperialism and we want nothing to do with it.
I agree with that. Maybe I didn't put it right. I didn't mean that Russophobia isn't justified. From time to time, it was very justified (not always but often). I meant that it's been portrayed in propaganda very clearly which is why Russian Imperialism is much easier for us to see and to protest against than American Imperialism. We were talking about language and PR so, that's what I meant.
@@Bald_Zeus Western Europeans saying "we want nothing to do with imperialism" is a trip.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT I think this point is correct. There is a bit of a double standard when we (America) deprive people of their self determination in the name of our interests, but censure nations like Russia for doing the same.
Btw, found your channel via Vicky 3. Great content. History-buff RUclips is really missing a perspective like this.
I didn't know he had a beard.
LOVE FRM BANGLADESH
Great guy 👍🇵🇰🇮🇳🇧🇩🇧🇹🇳🇵
In the verse he said that they desire men and not rape men because He said You come to men with (lust) rather than women
Nothing wrong with wanting to self reflect in a secular way. Well done man, and good luck.
Thanks ❤️. Bhai aap Hindi/Urdu content ka soch rahein hain ? Would be more accessible to share 👍.
I have an Urdu channel where I don't post often. You should check that out.
Bro u should watch science journey
5:19 as a person trained in engineering, my recent interest in history got me thoroughly confused in the beginning because you could find reports of events (reports are biased by reporter) and then you need to build a story from it to understand (that is biased by myself). So, how to find "true" history? There is no such thing. It is what your best guess is based on given information, and will change with new info. Like he said, you pick "arbitrary" side based on what you think the theme is when clear information is not available. Even in present day if you ask someone why he did something, he will give one reason, others may give another reason, your own understanding may give yet another reason. The reason you choose to accept will determine the overall narrative. Its messy and therefore must not be used as a basis to ever attack others today in any manner. There is a lot of hidden opinions in history, let alone current affairs.
😎😎amazing vid
Loved your john and steve reference ❤️
Rakhay Bani Phirdy O Maan-Boli De.
I just wanna say that you had done great. Just keep it up and on
Have you read the research of the German INARAH school about the early history of Islam?
It is absurd to think that Islam can be like Christianity and Judaism when it it comes to opting for culture or ethnicity without religion. The biggest problem here is that there will rise up one group who are able to claim a monopoly on the culture or ethnicity. As a culture or ethnicity, those who choose to become Muslim by taking their shahaada will feel alienated due to their non-Arab or non-Asian ethnicity. You often hear the phrase, 'I am an atheist Jew.' The next logical question would be what does that mean? Is this why Ethiopian Jews are discriminated against by their European brothers? Will Islam end up becoming a culture or ethnicity where membership is decided upon by birth only, rather than choice and belief? With regards to homosexuality or alcohol or idolatry, if these are things that you wish to pursue, then simply opt-out. There is no compulsion in Islam, but please do not take efforts to corrupt the religion for your selfish desires. Islam has never tolerated homosexuality and the punishment is clear. However, that being said, no Muslim will sneak into your bedroom to out you or condemn you as an individual. As a Muslim, we understand that the creation is imperfect in their actions, not their creation. Allah is perfect. We are not. I don't know of any Muslim who discusses his bedroom or private affairs. Although there are many Muslims who watch porn, I have never heard discussions about it. It is simply not important what you do behind closed doors because that is between you and Allah. That is the Muslim belief. Your viewers who have questions about Islam and the treatment of Homosexuality, should watch Hamza Yusef on this subject here: ruclips.net/video/iXRnWTB2FRg/видео.html
the clergy at the orders of the dynasties with a few exceptions does not represent individuals not affiliated to the dynasties by blood ties, in other words it does not represent the majorities since it is paid by the minorities (the dynasties again Once!).
one will perhaps search all eternity without finding any allusion to the principle of a dynastic power ruling the life of the Muslims in this world.
this strangely resembles what was happening in Europe before the century of revolutions also known as "The Age of Enlightenment": Church and Monarchy agreeing to dominate those who had not joined the Church and those who were not from Royal blood.
it is this "revolutionary" century that will bring democracy to Europe but in fact it is just a rediscovery or an update of this concept developed by ancient Greece (it looks like the story of Thales from Miletus
and electricity): discovery here and a few centuries later rediscovery there and men have the impression of having progressed!
I just wanna say I watched the whole Video and as a Tradtionalist Sunni Muslim with Hanafi Maturidi background I think this Tawil that some people try with Lut as is very very problematic and unacceptable. And Scharia >> Communism :* I suggest you to read Said Qutbs works inshaa allah you seem pretty chilled but Communism is just like Liberal Democracy against Islamic Values we have our own Superior System that we need to embrace and teach our Children to build again such great Empires like Al Andalus the Ottomans Moguls Seljuks and so on
your a disgusting human being you know that your just a religious bigot people like you are the reason why europe thinks that we are backwards
don;t worry your just a bigot
Democracy is kufr. The idea of ijma’ is not the same as democracy.
The scholars dont decide on something and then ask for other scholars to show a raise of hand if they agree😂
The scholars each look at the source material with their years of knowledge and experience, then they base a judgement according to quran and sunnah (daleel)
If scholars accept that the daleel (evidence) is in line with an opinion, they accept it and thats heat becomes ijma. For example, it is ijma’ that one cannot marry his mother. Something that is definitive.
How is two Indian kings fighting among themselves similar to a central asian warlord coming and establishing a dynasty? Isn't he a invader given he brings with him a completely foreign culture,traditional and civilization values which in case of Indian king conquering his rivals land would not happen atleast it wont be foreign since their origins would be same.
That depends on the invader. The Mughals though outsiders assimilated in the Indian culture.
@@muazzamshaikh2049 yes i saw the pictures of last mughal emperor in black and white and he didnt seem to different from an ordinary north indian
@@muazzamshaikh2049culture is not just about religion, they also brought in the culture of barbarism the culture of treating women as objects and treating them as winning trophy, this didn't happen in india, common didn't use to suffer in war of 2 kings, megasthenese also confirmed that, some exceptions are like marathas, they didn't follow this culture of principles, they even Ray ped Bengali Hindu women
Please why didn't you explain ummayad caliphs like abbasid caliphs
وعليكم السلام
I want to question your Islamic beliefs are you identify a Muslim Believer or a country Muslim you'll never have any problem is the Muslim belief that religion over but keep their traditions and second question do you believe Islam through all because you're born Muslim
Could you please help me?
To grant gazhali all that infamy is a stretch. There was also the year without summer in there where near global harvests collapased from global weather change from meteorite contributing to expansionist pressures and part of cause of the first plague
Physiognomy is real. Tragic.
Great discussion.
37:30 Bruh. As someone from the balkans, I _really_ don't get why people are making that comparison. To me it's only because russian troops are the one doing the marching so of course the US is up in arms but can't pull the usual bomb the target into nonexistence stratagem. I mean, they only liberated Kosovo to place troops there essentially.(But hey, I'll take them over the serbs) Regardless, Ukraine is no better off than us. It's an ex communist country whose politics, economy, corruption and general future outlook were shit. Just like the rest of us eastern europeans. Hell, Russia might've had a semi dictatorship but Ukraine certainly was no flourishing democracy(if that even exists). The two countries weren't that different, pre war at least. Heroic resistance, sure. Fountain of freedom and democracy? Hah. No. Funny how the media spins it.
28:00 kya bol rha hai bhai yaar ye, forcefully changing someone's religion is equivalent to robing them of their wealth and aurangzeb did that
Very sad to see your true colors.May Allah guide us all in the true path. My dear Muslim brothers and sisters, if you need to understand islamic history then you need to learn from reputable islamic historians.I suggest historians like usthaz Adnan Rashid,Dr stef keris, Dr Abdullah Haqim quick, Dr uthman lateef to enhance your islamic history and love towards islam. Iam unsubscribing from this channel.
Are you a muslim?
I want to know too bro hes sus
@@user-fayzawww I know
Didn't agree with a lot of what was said, but still enjoyed listening to it.
Wish you put as much effort on your own national identity as Pakistanis or Indians. The Indus valley civilization needs a lot more covering than Islam
I would agree but sadly, the Indus Valley isn't that well-studied for a number of reasons, with the biggest being that their language hasn't been deciphered.
Why are all murtads monstrously hideous looking? This guy should really consider a strictly voice only appearance on all form of media and try to stay home as much as possible in the real world. It would be a kind gesture to those with sight.
Beautiful discussion comrade red salute and asalamualaikum from a fellow Muslim communist ❤️ :D
Aren't Marxist supposed to be atheist? How can you be a Muslim and a communist . Weird
@@urooj09 it's a misconception there have been a lot of religious Marxists
@@cylixmorg2327 still. By Marx religion is the opium of masses. Why would you be religious if you think it hampers economic and social progressivism
@@urooj09 you have misunderstood the quote and funnily enough the full quote is quite contrary to what it is usually presented as
@@urooj09 "Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx
thanks for showing your true colours. Unsubscribed
☹
@@AlMuqaddimahYT While I certainly don't agree with your view of democracy (they might be taking issue with your Islam though lol), I won't unsubscribe. Your channel gives valuable information in an impartial manner and we need more of that. When we disagree we should engage with eachother even more, rather than shun one another and lead to further division. We're all sharing this globe together, whether we like it or not. All the best, man.
@@722georgetonorge I respect that and I thank you for respecting me enough to disagree with me without hating me. Of course, you're on this channel, not to hear my opinions but to learn Islamic history and I appreciate that you can separate the two. Many can't. Cheers.
You forget to talk about how muslim invade, destroy other religion worships place and force conversion. You miss this part
t. poojeet
Average coping pajeet be like:
Hindu kingdoms used to invade other hindu kingdoms before muslims came lol.
Show me one place in the quran or historical event where Muslims have forced others to convert you liar.
Wallahi! Islam will fight back and your liberal agenda to reform Islam will fall flat on its face, Islam will never reform till the day of judgement, i too was a so called liberal muslim a few years back, but Alhamdulillah Allah ﷻ brought me back and opened my eyes, I'm still fighting some of the liberal inclinations i had acquired through social conditioning and Inshallah I'll overcome them too.
Lol😂. Do you even know what/who a liberal is?
@@CCCP_Again do you think you know what/who a liberal is?
@@ilmnaut8032 😂 caught you in the act didn't I?
@@CCCP_Again you're suffering from dunning--kruger it seems, do you really think one will need to act to talk about something as petty as what a liberal is? Or you're projecting your incompetence on others? Now i have to prove whether i know what a liberal is to someone who's most probably an exhibit A liberalised progressive distorter of religion?
@@ilmnaut8032 let's talk about something more interesting, why did you become a "liberal" According to your definition?
Syawish, though you are doing some good. You should not have let your pride in your research overtake reason, you should not try to liberalize peoples' interpretations on the religion of islam. If you are reasonable you'd see the damage this can do; there is a difference between a "secular perspective" and a "liberal perspective" on not just history, you're doing more damage than you think by pushing this narrative and attitude towards your religion, to yourself and others in the akhira.
Allah did not punish the people of Sodom, Gomorrah, for rape, so surah clear وَلُوطاً إِذْ قَالَ لِقَومِهِ أَتَأْتُونَ الفَاحِشَةَ مَا سَبَقَكُمْ بِها مِنْ أَحَدٍ مِّنَ العَالَمِيْنَ * إِنَّكُمْ لَتَأْتُونَ الرِّجَالَ شَهْوَةً مِّنْ دُونِ النِّسَآءِ بَلْ أَنْتُمْ قَومٌ مُّسْرِفُونَ * وَمَا كَانَ جَوابَ قَوْمِهِ إِلاَّ أَنْ قَالُوا أَخْرِجُوهُم مِّنْ قَرْيَتِكُمْ إِنَّهُمْ أُنَاسٌ يَتَطَهَّرُون
Everybody loves the Reformation but somehow they forget the Thirty Years' War. I can understand rulers in other places not wanting to unleash that kind of chaos in their realms.
pakistan is a islamic republic we do have democracy but we exclude religious minorities like the christians and many many other religious groups we need not to deny this this is a thing and it is wrong and i want a batter pakistan where every one is equal like europe no matter if they are a woman part of the lgbtq community
i hope we get that pakistan one day
Sorry,We don't want that kind of thing here.You can move to the west.
Are you a muslim? Bc theses things you want are unislamic
this will never happen, Pakistan needs Sharia.
Very entertaining! I always enjoy hearing your opinions.
Love your videos keep going!
@Al Muqaddimah, do you consider yourself a secular liberal muslim?
Why does he have that accent, he is from Pakistan
I do not agree that colonialism is the prerequisite to democracy: watch sweden and finland who are not colonial nations but are the most prosper democracies in the world
Sweden had colonies in Africa and the Caribbean, and aside from that they also colonized the countries around the baltic sea, such as Estonia and Finland. Finland specifically has basically been a colonized country for most of their history, first by the Swedes, and then by the Russians.
I meant that wealth is the only thing that makes democracies look like they're working but they're actually not. Sweden did partake a bit in colonialism but even if we say that it didn't, it didn't exist in a vacuum in Europe and was interacting with colonial states, which was a factor to it obtaining wealth as well.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT What do you think is the best system to replace democracy? You have a bust of Marx apparently, but you didn't say much about communism. You don't seem to support theocracy either, so I'm curious as to whether you have a preferred system. Thanks for any response, also it's fun to finally put a face to the voice. Cheers!
@@722georgetonorge My views on Democracy are the same as I guess Winston Churchill's were. It's the worst system of government except all the other systems. We should keep it around because we don't have a better one but many people believe it to be an ideal system and try to dispense it around the world. Many Eastern countries are judged for their lack of democracy as if democracy is the standard of human wellbeing, it's not.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Ah, well if that's the case then I misunderstood and couldn't agree more. I guess our other exchange over respectfully disagreeing isn't as relevant now haha. Anyway, thanks for the reply, I've never talked to a celebrity before... I'm gonna have to write me mum about this one. Have a good one man!
Very informative podcast. Very knowledgeable. Keep growing
I don't think changing Islam to fit Ourselves will Fix our Problems itll only Cause new divisions nd Problems
We better Look at the Problems separately in every single matter nd should fix them as that A Simple problem not As "The whole religion is holding us back" type of Action
My Friend if u dont know enough about Religion its fine but dont say " Its about time we change it nd become Like all other people of the book " our Religion is perfect we r not Our Prophet was Perfect our Leaders R Not Our idea of Ummah is perfect our ways to be it r not
If Islam was being implemented in all the lands where Ummaht-Ul-Muslima was we would hv a lot of peace amongst ourselves but its not😔😔😔😔
I am disappointed that he said Democracy isn't a good way to govern,what alternative he has for a better way? As (i think Churchill said) democracy is a bad way to govern but it's the best we have....
The best defense for democracy is "there are no alternatives". If that's the case then we should stop holding it to such high standards and consider it a benchmark for "civilized" nations.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT so, what's your alternative?
@@danielslubski1028 tyranny or anarchy, i am a brazilian if democracy was a system that is just false and hollow why this madness man want destroy the democracy? i am every day worry about a dictatorship ,why the people don't se the important of democracy?this video give a small answer is a servant thinking
@@nicolasferreira1146 the sad thing about Democracy is that you need the population to be above certain level of education and tolerance for Democracy to work,most Muslim countries are not there,and definitely no Arab country.(maybe Algeria or Tunisia?)
@@AlMuqaddimahYT all the nations are civilized
Fantastic video, well explained mashallah 👌🏻
Syawish A Rahman brother am becoming a fan of your knowledge. I mean I myself do lot of research, but still am no where near the depth you have. I always wanted to be in such company, grow my knowledge and experience and be able to judge things going on these days. I want to do something for people, become an eyeopener through influencing them. If someone could guide me the method of studying 📚 and doing research, without getting into degree curriculum 📜 .
Abe chuye, Rehman is not a Muslim but anti-Islamic propagandist.
The figures used in history books such as Tabari, waqidi, etc. are totally out of proportion. In the first twenty years of the so called Muslim conquest over 5 millions are supposed to have been killed by Muslims! Ditto, the Tigers turning red due to Hulago armies slaughter is just someone trying to be dramatic.
Just be careful of the organizations sponsoring your channel. Some of them might have a different agendas.
I don't agree with some of the things but overall its good history. As for the lgbt post, you stated only facts about the history of Islam and how it had its clashes with homosexuality but at the same time in shariah law LGBT is completely forbidden. No compromise at all
I disagreed with you on Islam, but everything else was pretty spot-on. Thank you!
🙏
Hi love your work not sure if you will respond to this but if you do that conversation about Pakistani identity struck very hard. Millions of people including myself had ancestors who left for Pakistan from India 80 years ago and simply are left with a Pakistani identity. Unlike yourself as a Punjabi or Sindhi etc. As a muhajir I feel that if I don’t see myself as a Pakistani then I am no one whereas others in Pakistan who didn’t migrate at least have their ethnic groups identity. The only way for us to feel we belong is if all Pakistanis regardless of ethnicity throw away their heritage as you suggested which at some level feels wrong. Perhaps muhajir is an identity in itself.
I don't know very much about Mujahirs and how they feel about their identities but I have heard that Muhajirs have felt excluded from society. Pakistan's ideology really did not do anything to help create a new identity and preserving the old ones. We were expected to leave our identities and become "Pakistani" so, I do believe that what's been done to groups such as Muhajir is wrong.
You're an Indian, stop pretending to be muhajir.
IDK, you live in Pakistan, you should be a Pakistani. Your forefathers chose this identity. No turning back either.
@@GrigRP Take more Indian Muslims.
Assalomu alaykum bro.
How can i learn to show historical info like you. Do you have online courses to learn your style like you?
Preach on! Comrade 🚩
I think In Pakistan Societal reformation is underway, The fact that people claim they are Muslims and then doing things on the contrary is the testimony of majority being fasiq and munafiqs. Pakistan suffers more with individual corruption and doesn't strive to be more righteous.
Moreover, I think Moududi gives lots of literature on political Islam.
Best islamic explaining channel...
Here they discuss and explian the internal and external problems of islamic faith and its community....othet than glorifying and defending it, Keep going...
t. poojeet
I was surprised that you didn't mention the Mutzilla or the Quranists or Avicenna when asked about reform in Islam. The current version of Islam IS kind of a reform but a conservative one by Al Ghazali and his patron caliph. And I learned that from you in the Mehna video. Also you mention the internet and colonialism but not your own video on the printing press, the thing which greatly helped the protestant reform.
Confused murtad