MTU is also used on ships , and they are magnificient as they shutdown half the cilinders when not going full speed . when they do you hear the other cilinders fire up and when realy on the move you hear 2 pssst sounds and 2 blowers pump in a few hundred extra horse power.
Leopard -high top speed -modern fcs -has blow panel ammo rack -great stabilizer -high main gun elevation -high price -heavy MBT T72 -high acceleration -low profile -hard to shoot -good stabilizer -has autorealoader -fast reaload -low price -more lighther -easy to transport Thats what iknow about both of these 💀
@@Greekmilsim You are right, but you must take in consideration, that loader get tired over time, which slow him, on the other hadd autoloader has still same timing. This taken from sharing experiences between tankers with human loader and autoloader.
@@reentrysfs6317 It might depend on type of T-72, but for T-72M4CZ its 8 rounds per minute, which is 7,5 s reload time for its standard munition (HEAT, HE, APFSDS-T). Czech tankers says its 8s. On the other hand, there is 22 rounds in carousel so it might change to 10 s when its loading last round. This all comes from experiences exchange between tankers with autoloader and living loader. So basicaly, autoloader can be slower but keep same speed around 8s, living loader can be faster up to 5s, but can get tired over time which might slow him.
Leopárd 2 A4 MTU 883 Ka 501 common rail V12 duble turbo charger multi fuel diesel engine 1500 hp gear system :Renk 1500A 10+4 speed full automatic vehicle weigth 68.5-70.5 metric tons T 72 V12 38.8 liter mechanic fuel pump Not charged atmoshferic diesel engin typ V45 family 740 - 840 hp manual gerbox vehicle weigth 43-46metric tons
The Leo2 has a 47.6l V12 and the Renk transmission is 4gear forward and 2 gear reverse transmission What kids forget in a tank HP are not important.. torque is . Leo2 has 4600Nm
@@joshharris2793 from everything it faces frontally, they are, if you're talking about by comparable year atleast, the weakspots on the front of the hull are smaller than the ones in NATO tanks, while having exposed turret rings (especially on the Abrams) while there is still the issue of very thin roof armor on both the drivers side of the hull and the turret roof, making them less armored against top attacks and artillery granted weakspots probably won't matter if the target would be more than 2kms away and basically everyone with the popular MBTs having developed APFSDS than can prolly penetrate their counterparts
@@Ry-bo9hi no I mean it’s feasibly impossible for Russian tanks without a substantial amount of additional size like the (leopard 2a5 did after the 2a4) to have better protection then a nato tank, I worked in m1a1s at a contractor workshop in Australia I assure you they are more armoured then any Russian counterparts, otherwise ERA wouldn’t be such a big fix for their inherent design flaws
@@joshharris2793 if I'm not wrong the reason why NATO mbts are so heavy and massive it's because their NERA and composites use spaced armor principles as well? I just don't buy it if were comparing by year because both layouts work tho I concede that the M1's base for the turret front is tougher while the base hull all around for the soviets are stronger though both Russia and the US use ERA to combat in urban environments, you prolly know this cuz you worked with m1s and the whole TUSK package deal that still wouldn't solve it's hull problem, if you'd see israel's conflicts we can see Merkava apfsds penetrating the turret roof of a T62 at an extreme angle, that alone isn't good news for the M1s front plate or roof especially against top attacks and with it's weight and layout I don't think they can put ERA on top maybe APS?
@@Ry-bo9hi the Abrams turret and lower armour is solid NERA and composite and so is the lower glacius armour which Russian tanks lack, the armour of the body above the driver is also angled at the exact angle a solid sabot (apfsds)shot will shatter 100% of the time assuming the Abrams is level and in hull down, the leopard 2 however has those massive angled pieces on the turret which are actually hollow, and the whole assembly equals like 2 to 3 times that of the armour thickness of a Russian equivalent aswell as having heavy body armour covering up front aswell. leopards can also actually get to 100km/h but are tuned slower to use fuel sparingly.
It's not only about horsepowers but also about weight. Forget about T-72, T-8x, T-9x, T-14 what so ever. Outdated tanks. Bad design. 🇷🇺 = 💀 = *_SS Rashist Orcs_* *Слава Україні* 💙🇺🇦💛🇪🇺 *Героям слава* 🙏🏻💪🏻🤝🏻🇩🇰
lol cl0wn that's not even russian t72, that variant is polish and other countries. Russian modern upgraded T72b3 is much faster than Leopard, it would blow it away easily in a race
@@scratchy996 odd way of training. 2A7+ has much better aiming, jamming, vision. Wouldn't a simulator be better. Might as will train in the T72, since the only training will be the driving of a tank (in general).
that t72 is not even russian, the M is polish/czech old variant. Modern Russian upgraded T-72B3 is much faster than Leopard and would blow it away easily in a race (or in a fight)
![Gigantic!: Abrams, Leopard, Challenger & Leclerc, [All The Best of Tanks in Action]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-SGcfb6ckwM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Gigantic!: Abrams, Leopard, Challenger & Leclerc, [All The Best of Tanks in Action]](/img/tr.png)
Love the T-72 driving revving his engine like its a street race. If you want to see something really enlightening, do the race in reverse.
T72 is manual transmission, he can have some fun.
T-72 out there like a highschool kid in a Honda on a red light
Correct. 😀
T 72 too slow for retreat, Leo, excellent attack speed.
Comrade we do not retreat, stalin orderd it so.
Russian tank development
@@militaristaustrian wow, Stalin still gave orders in 1972, 16 years after his death????
@@steffenrosmus9177 it was A. A joke B the doctrin was still the same
who cares? its 2 crew in tanks having fun 🥰
Easy win for the Leo
The whole world wants to protect the climate.
Hungary: wanna see a tank race?
Military technology demonstrations are held all over the world.
You're protecting the climate, we watching this funny race.
@@andreashorst1390 It was a joke, I was there too, my family is from Kunszentmárton
@@Larsen_B33 look at my profile pic, love it and I was there
You can`t protect any climate !
I love the sound of 1500 hp MTU-engine🥰.
MTU is also used on ships , and they are magnificient as they shutdown half the cilinders when not going full speed . when they do you hear the other cilinders fire up and when realy on the move you hear 2 pssst sounds and 2 blowers pump in a few hundred extra horse power.
If that was a T72A, then it was no competition to begin with. 700hp vs 1600hp is no match
It is a T-72M1
The Leo has 1500hp. But the T72 has 15 Tons les wight.
T-72 has much less weight..
@@B3Nutzer 15 ton's isn't going to make up for half the horsepower.
780hp
Leopard
-high top speed
-modern fcs
-has blow panel ammo rack
-great stabilizer
-high main gun elevation
-high price
-heavy MBT
T72
-high acceleration
-low profile
-hard to shoot
-good stabilizer
-has autorealoader
-fast reaload
-low price
-more lighther
-easy to transport
Thats what iknow about both of these 💀
T72 shoot slower than LEO 2 due to autoloader
@@Greekmilsim You are right, but you must take in consideration, that loader get tired over time, which slow him, on the other hadd autoloader has still same timing. This taken from sharing experiences between tankers with human loader and autoloader.
@@Novas9510 I think the auto loader has a varied reload due the the carousel system ranging from 7.5-10 seconds.
@@reentrysfs6317 It might depend on type of T-72, but for T-72M4CZ its 8 rounds per minute, which is 7,5 s reload time for its standard munition (HEAT, HE, APFSDS-T). Czech tankers says its 8s. On the other hand, there is 22 rounds in carousel so it might change to 10 s when its loading last round.
This all comes from experiences exchange between tankers with autoloader and living loader.
So basicaly, autoloader can be slower but keep same speed around 8s, living loader can be faster up to 5s, but can get tired over time which might slow him.
Leopard wins ✌️👍😉
How about in reverse?
The T72 was quite good of the mark.
magyarhangok vannak xD
Lada against Porsche
Leo says meow 🤣🤣🤣
t72 is an operators nightmare
MTU MB 873 Ka-501 engine the BEST
The Leopard is a very heavy tank.
Nice competition but if you see the video... you see still a modern tank and a russian oldtimer.
2A4 and M1 are from the same time. Since the Leopard 2A4 got developed as a counter to those
@YugoSlav did I ever say that? I said the Leopard 2A4 and the T72M1 are from the same time
@YugoSlav damn yt said that you replied to my comment..
@YugoSlav if you see the Leopard 2 A4 and the russian T72... than you feel like this
Next time tug-of-war, please!
Mantap👍
No contest.
It was a Close Race
Looks like T-72B to me, flat turret at front, late model road wheels.
Leopárd 2 A4 MTU 883 Ka 501 common rail V12 duble turbo charger multi fuel diesel engine 1500 hp gear system :Renk 1500A 10+4 speed full automatic vehicle weigth 68.5-70.5 metric tons T 72 V12 38.8 liter mechanic fuel pump Not charged atmoshferic diesel engin typ V45 family 740 - 840 hp manual gerbox vehicle weigth 43-46metric tons
873 engine, 46L I think
The Leo2 has a 47.6l V12 and the Renk transmission is 4gear forward and 2 gear reverse transmission
What kids forget in a tank HP are not important.. torque is . Leo2 has 4600Nm
Supercharged v12 vs turbocharged v12
the thing that still baffles me about modern NATO and USSR tanks is that the fat NATO one is faster but the smaller USSR is better protected
Ussr tanks are not better protected at all
@@joshharris2793 from everything it faces frontally, they are, if you're talking about by comparable year atleast, the weakspots on the front of the hull are smaller than the ones in NATO tanks, while having exposed turret rings (especially on the Abrams) while there is still the issue of very thin roof armor on both the drivers side of the hull and the turret roof, making them less armored against top attacks and artillery
granted weakspots probably won't matter if the target would be more than 2kms away and basically everyone with the popular MBTs having developed APFSDS than can prolly penetrate their counterparts
@@Ry-bo9hi no I mean it’s feasibly impossible for Russian tanks without a substantial amount of additional size like the (leopard 2a5 did after the 2a4) to have better protection then a nato tank, I worked in m1a1s at a contractor workshop in Australia I assure you they are more armoured then any Russian counterparts, otherwise ERA wouldn’t be such a big fix for their inherent design flaws
@@joshharris2793 if I'm not wrong the reason why NATO mbts are so heavy and massive it's because their NERA and composites use spaced armor principles as well? I just don't buy it if were comparing by year because both layouts work tho I concede that the M1's base for the turret front is tougher while the base hull all around for the soviets are stronger
though both Russia and the US use ERA to combat in urban environments, you prolly know this cuz you worked with m1s and the whole TUSK package deal
that still wouldn't solve it's hull problem, if you'd see israel's conflicts we can see Merkava apfsds penetrating the turret roof of a T62 at an extreme angle, that alone isn't good news for the M1s front plate or roof especially against top attacks and with it's weight and layout I don't think they can put ERA on top
maybe APS?
@@Ry-bo9hi the Abrams turret and lower armour is solid NERA and composite and so is the lower glacius armour which Russian tanks lack, the armour of the body above the driver is also angled at the exact angle a solid sabot (apfsds)shot will shatter 100% of the time assuming the Abrams is level and in hull down, the leopard 2 however has those massive angled pieces on the turret which are actually hollow, and the whole assembly equals like 2 to 3 times that of the armour thickness of a Russian equivalent aswell as having heavy body armour covering up front aswell. leopards can also actually get to 100km/h but are tuned slower to use fuel sparingly.
It's not only about horsepowers but also about weight.
Forget about T-72, T-8x, T-9x, T-14 what so ever. Outdated tanks. Bad design.
🇷🇺 = 💀 = *_SS Rashist Orcs_*
*Слава Україні* 💙🇺🇦💛🇪🇺
*Героям слава* 🙏🏻💪🏻🤝🏻🇩🇰
Who is Слава?
Who is your hero?
gtfo with your nazzi propaganda
Walić Ukrainę 😘😊
Wtf
the leo mcould beat the T 72 in reverse man xD
lol cl0wn that's not even russian t72, that variant is polish and other countries. Russian modern upgraded T72b3 is much faster than Leopard, it would blow it away easily in a race
@@phaioncirrus3818 T-72m1, export version for USSR's allies. And he was talking about how the Leo could beat the T-72m1in reverse. Not t-72b3.
@@JawnMarston you mad
newest model leo 2a7
More precisely: 2A7+
The Hungarian Defence Forces bought 44 pieces of this type.
2A7V
In the video it is most def a 2A4
@@asadini True, This is a 2A4.
Hungary bought 12 2A4 for training purposes until they get their brand new 44 2A7+ .
@@scratchy996 odd way of training. 2A7+ has much better aiming, jamming, vision. Wouldn't a simulator be better.
Might as will train in the T72, since the only training will be the driving of a tank (in general).
Toll, ein Formel 1 Rennen.
Ist natürlich die wichtigste Fähigkeit eines Panzers.
siehe es einfach als Spaß. Und nebenbei: wäre das nicht die beste Form von Krieg ?
Darf man etwa keinen Spaß haben?
Nein, die wichtigste Fähigkeit eines Panzers ist, Bier auf der Kanone zu transportieren: ruclips.net/video/SoJ40K7mSl4/видео.html
Mobilität ist tatsächlich die wichtigste Fähigkeit. Sonst würds auch ne Feldkanone tun.
Mi ukradi serbia 89 komada mora da vrati serbia makedonia ARM
Leopard2 is the best .T72s is trash
that t72 is not even russian, the M is polish/czech old variant. Modern Russian upgraded T-72B3 is much faster than Leopard and would blow it away easily in a race (or in a fight)
@@phaioncirrus3818 in theory
@@Greekmilsim not in theory at all. In proven FACT, cry harder, or if you have half a brain, just look up the specs yourself
@@phaioncirrus3818 russian systems can't beat western tanks is a rule of nature
@@Greekmilsim says a f..a.g.ot. who's never served in the army.