Despite the cool rollover, the Jeep Wrangler test was not remotely realistic. The crash test dummy should have been wearing a sleeveless t-shirt and a backwards baseball cap, while vaping, and chugging a can of Monster Energy. So that test is entirely null and void.
@Davey Today yes, but from like 1995 to 2016 there were many Daewoos, you could see Matiz, Tico and Cielo everywhere (here in Romania at least), combined I say that they exceeded 1 milion cars produced solely in Romania. Problem today is part finding, although Daewoo are highly reliable. Only issue with them (rather big) is the rust.
@Davey depends on where you live. In the US we had them for like 5 years un daewoo and then after they went bankrupt gm sold the aveo and Suzuki the reno and forenza which were daewoos. But iirc the sonic sparks are daewoo still.
Nice to see some lesser-seen camera angles IIHS! I would love to see some more overhead views/views showing what the car does after the impact. I am a huge advocate for after-collision features such as hazard lights, automatic braking, and audible distress signals, and being able to see what the vehicle does after the crash is always nice to see.
This! Seeing the Model Y roll away after the crash is genuinely concerning if this happened in the real world. It could head straight to another car or an oncoming lane. Surprised Tesla doesn't amplify the "regeneration" to make the car stop, as the brake pads are clearly not applied post-crash.
@@joshxkerrigan I’m sure if you were in a wreck you would probably hit the brakes and stop once you just figured out you were hit. In this case I don’t think the dummy is alive to do that..
@@joshxkerriganidk if you notice but there’s a dummy like you in the car. They don’t brake. But perhaps you can like everyone else does when a collision happens
@@joshxkerrigan Many safety-oriented companies like Volvo have their vehicles do just this. The small overlap acts as a glancing blow, hopefully pushing the vehicle away so the main crumple zone can absorb more of the impact. I'm unsure as to why the Model Y rolled away after though, but I suspect it has something to do with the main motor assembly being compromised by tearing the wheel off, along with other potential systems such as ABS, TCS, and wheel position sensors being damaged in a way that might mean the car cannot safely determine whether or not it should stop. Another thing to note is that in this type of collision, the vehicle would be sent *away* from oncoming traffic, as this test assumes that the vehicle narrowly struck another. In RHD countries, the test would be flipped accordingly, and the results would be the same.
@@dotcinematics then you never have been in or met a person who suffered a car crash or any accident for that matter. German has once again a beautiful word for it, "Schockstarre". Wich translates to the inability to move because of shock. And even if you could mentally handle the events of such an impact in the short time it occurres, if you are knocked out that's not going to help either. Automatically applying the brakes as soon as an airbag is deployed shoud be standard on any new vehicle. Especially those who can already brake automatically.
Auto-pilot on the Model Y "I have determined that his vehicle is drivable. Scheduling your appointment at Telsa service center, with three super charger stops, one stop at Starbucks, and five stops at flannel shirt stores enroute to your destination. Enjoy this David Bowie song"
I noticed the Teslas for some reason all take it really well. The Model X was the first SUV to be rated 5 stars in safety. My theory is the fact that it doesn’t have engine, gas etc there’s less energy that’s needed to be transferred so it’s not going to be under as much stress as the other vehicles.
@@twisterman101new4they have batteries that are heavier than combustion engines. i would think that electric cars have even more energy to transfer being heavier than their ICE counterparts
I love the higher angle from behind watching the cars slide past the barrier. Also, I love how the Tesla basically drove in the other direction after hitting the barrier. Lol
@@Mindphaser98 Who is saying it should stop suddenly? No other car does that, they do however not veer off in random directions after the crash like the Tesla does. But I'm sure your internal organs would love getting hit again in another accident :)
I'd take the Bronco any day, better design and overall quality, has pretty much the same off-road capabilities and it's much safer! I love the new Bronco.
@@carter8292 the Wrangelr got a score of "marginal", and the write-up essentially says it was entirely because of the rollover amd the fact that that's unsafe
Depends on how you define "off road". For rock crawling and such, no. For driving to Starbucks (which is what both are mostly used for), the Bronco is superior @@SuperCarGuy2007
I’m honestly shocked the BRZ did so well. Small sports cars tend to be crunchy, but that new chassis is super well engineered for safety as much has handling.
@@Ratboy2004 I would say the Tesla was just as bad for the opposite reason, because it keeps rolling it puts other vehicles in danger or could veer off the roadway. You don't want the vehicle to stop too quickly but you do want it to stop
@@Ratboy2004 bouncing isn't bad, if the rear goes up in a crash, it sucks alot of energy from the impact transfering it in rotational energy, crashing in an BRZ or GT86 always looks ugly but it is actualy safer than some other cars
Yeah, no. That’s all nonsense. The bronco and model x are within 500 lbs of each other. The x just performed better here by deflecting off the barrier. And there are a million examples of non deforming potential things one could hit while driving.
@@SimonWoodburyForget You do realise we all have access to the manufacturer specs right? The Tesla Model Y tested here only weighs 4282 pounds, less than many vehicles. Please stop making up things.
@@SimonWoodburyForget you’re moving the goal post. First your issue was weight. Turns out the Y isn’t even the heaviest vehicle in this video. Then your issue is ‘likelihood’ of the scenario? If I had to pick any vehicle in this video to ride in during this test it would absolutely be the y.
Me thinking after watching the wrangler rollover on driver-side small overlap test - "I mean it's obvious, it's a SUV with high center of gravity, it will rollover." Then Bronco comes in - "Hmm..."
I thought that was interesting too. Looked it up and the Bronco is a few inches wider and shorter in the base model which probably improves its center of gravity a bit.
@Miguel Abrego It also appears it was designed so when this impact occurs, the crumple zone functions in a way that drives the vehicle into the ground, rather than rebound up into the air. Very well designed!
@@puckcat22679 Funny, here in Europe and Romania, the Aveo was a small sedan or hatchback based on it, different from the Chevrolet Spark 2007, or 2013. The "european" Aveo got one of the worst results ever in the front crash test. It also looked very ugly. Spark 2 and Matiz are nice little cars.
I have a feeling the institute still uses a high-speed film camera to record the 2013 Spark crash test. I don't know when was the last time the Institue shot on film. January 6, 2023 11:06PM
I wonder how the executives of this serious organization react to so many people watching their videos knowing many of them aren’t looking to buy these cars and are just watching the videos because they find them interesting
Test the MX-5 Miata please. The structure is unchanged since the 2015 on-sale date and there are a lot of them running around these days. EU tested it at four-stars a while ago but your tests are evaluate metaphorically wider and deeper than theirs.
Idiots who don't off-road buy them and highway drive an off-road vehicle. Off-road vehicles do not require airbags if you use them for their intended trail purpose.
@@stevenslouber4947 Airbags can be dangerous when off roading sometimes they inadvertently go off and can injure you and cause loss of control. Luckily its not that hard to disable them.
Tesla and Volvo (and a very few others... even the Bronco here made an attempt) have perfected that beautiful side-stepping deflection on the small overlap test.
This is actually not a good thing. The Subarus do crash tests the best. The car should stop moving and proceed to go nowhere after impact. Imagine this you're driving down the highway in the right or left lane, you get into this type of accident while trying to avoid someone slamming on the brakes. In your Subaru the car basically stops all momentum and comes to rest fairly rapidly. In another vehicle you have a glancing blow however in both cases the cars are now dead and undrivable. Meaning you might also have lost brakes or the ability to apply the brakes. So I'm your Chevy Spark or Ford Bronco you continue to roll into traffic and most likely cause more injury and accidents. In the Subaru the car comes to an immediate halt and gives the motorist a stationary vehicle which they can avoid. Where a rolling vehicle will be a hazard that you have to guess which direction it will go.
@BukuiZhao yep the block all the sensors and cameras to see how safest the cars are and tesla model y is the safest car in the world according to the EU
I actually have a very good idea of why the JL Wrangler did this. The metal supports for the front bumper end right where the headlights are at. The front end is also narrower than the body and tapers, so even though the fender flares make it just as wide it's not all structural. The Bronco interestingly on models that don't have the Sasquach package have removable front and rear impact bars in the wheel wells. It may be they discovered this would be a flaw in certain accident scenarios and added them in the models that they would clear. The Bronco also lacks the front end taper so it's far less narrow at the point of impact on this test, which is 25% overlap unlike the 50% they used to test with. With the steel bumper on my JL I feel like the chances of a roll over in this type of accident is far less. But I'm curious what would happen with a Sasquach Bronco without the impact bars they have extended in the front, and at the rear part of the wheel well near the foot well of the cabin.
You guys should really do testing on 3rd row safety, as a father looking for a new car with 3rd row seating, I cannot find anything on what the safest cars are in this category
Would the panel that impacted the top left of the drivers head from the airbag deploying in the Tesla cause any harm to the driver? It seems like it left a decent paint mark on the part but at the same time looks like a very light and flimsy part.
Seems like the test was designed so that the driver's head would go towards the area not reached or least protected by the front and lateral airbags (kind of a worst-case scenario head-on collision).
New Wrangler is even worse than the 2020 Wrangler. In the 2022 version, the side airbags do not even deploy and are likely to seriously injure the lower leg/foot. January 6, 2023 11:07PM
IIHS has a separate evaluation for head restraints. Dummies are designed for specific crash modes, so we wouldn't get any useful information from a frontal crash test dummy during the rebound. Our cameras need to be able to clearly see the airbag interaction in this test so we remove the head restraints.
funny things: 0:06 ow jk ima get up bye 0:20 oopsie i fell 0:23 why are you chasing me 0:44 oo got a lil dizzy 1:07 i know how to back away so bye 1:30 why am i here 1:50 SIKE I'M OUTTA HERE
It might be useful for IIHS to film some crash tests at 65, 80, and 90 MPH, to show people what could happen to them if they are going highway or faster speeds, hiand hit a guard rail or bridge abutment.
We did some tests a couple of years back with AAA at 50 and 56 mph to demonstrate how small increases in speed can lead to big changes in outcome due to the exponential increase in energy. You can see those here: ruclips.net/video/tZChyjaqNBI/видео.html
they explained that in another reply: seat interaction of the dummy is not part of this test, but Airbag interaction is. they want to see clearly how the dummy impacts the Airbag, so they remove the headrests for this test (or i guess when it is integrated swap out the seat)
Despite the cool rollover, the Jeep Wrangler test was not remotely realistic. The crash test dummy should have been wearing a sleeveless t-shirt and a backwards baseball cap, while vaping, and chugging a can of Monster Energy. So that test is entirely null and void.
You forget the missing doors too 😂
🤣😂
You just described a WRX owner. Wrangler drivers are 20 year-old college girls with rich dads who drive it to Starbucks and back
Don’t forget the white sunglasses, they come with the wrangler.
@@PG-3462 you wouldn't describe late 20s as young?
Groovy music and watching thousands of dollars get smashed? Hell yeah!
Thanks for keeping us safe, IIHS!
...you mean, hundreds of thousands of dollars
yes its all getting smashed, but its not wasted. Its for our safety !
Song is, "Better Late Than Never" off the album, "Sharp Suits & Thin Ties"
Safety measures always come from sacrifices.
@@jimym__ but your lack of punctuation could annihilate us all in a push of the "Launch" button
Appreciate your effort to engage with viewers more over the past year. Stuff like this helps to raise awareness about what you do.
Especially since NBC’s Dateline stopped showing stories like this and focused on murder mysteries.
Unlike NBC, IIHS did not add explosives to the vehicles to make crash tests look cooler.
I can't believe they turned BeamNG into a real thing. So cool
@@henryscored18 Woosh
what a funny and original joke. please post when your netflix special is
Funny bastard 🤣
ikr
Ye the mod is amazing
The spark surprised me.
The 2013 Spark is the safest small car ever. Just like the Daewoo Matiz was for the year 2000.
@Davey Today yes, but from like 1995 to 2016 there were many Daewoos, you could see Matiz, Tico and Cielo everywhere (here in Romania at least), combined I say that they exceeded 1 milion cars produced solely in Romania. Problem today is part finding, although Daewoo are highly reliable. Only issue with them (rather big) is the rust.
@Davey depends on where you live. In the US we had them for like 5 years un daewoo and then after they went bankrupt gm sold the aveo and Suzuki the reno and forenza which were daewoos. But iirc the sonic sparks are daewoo still.
Fr
@Davey at least in the us
Nice to see some lesser-seen camera angles IIHS! I would love to see some more overhead views/views showing what the car does after the impact. I am a huge advocate for after-collision features such as hazard lights, automatic braking, and audible distress signals, and being able to see what the vehicle does after the crash is always nice to see.
This! Seeing the Model Y roll away after the crash is genuinely concerning if this happened in the real world. It could head straight to another car or an oncoming lane. Surprised Tesla doesn't amplify the "regeneration" to make the car stop, as the brake pads are clearly not applied post-crash.
@@joshxkerrigan I’m sure if you were in a wreck you would probably hit the brakes and stop once you just figured out you were hit. In this case I don’t think the dummy is alive to do that..
@@joshxkerriganidk if you notice but there’s a dummy like you in the car. They don’t brake. But perhaps you can like everyone else does when a collision happens
@@joshxkerrigan Many safety-oriented companies like Volvo have their vehicles do just this. The small overlap acts as a glancing blow, hopefully pushing the vehicle away so the main crumple zone can absorb more of the impact. I'm unsure as to why the Model Y rolled away after though, but I suspect it has something to do with the main motor assembly being compromised by tearing the wheel off, along with other potential systems such as ABS, TCS, and wheel position sensors being damaged in a way that might mean the car cannot safely determine whether or not it should stop.
Another thing to note is that in this type of collision, the vehicle would be sent *away* from oncoming traffic, as this test assumes that the vehicle narrowly struck another. In RHD countries, the test would be flipped accordingly, and the results would be the same.
@@dotcinematics then you never have been in or met a person who suffered a car crash or any accident for that matter. German has once again a beautiful word for it, "Schockstarre". Wich translates to the inability to move because of shock. And even if you could mentally handle the events of such an impact in the short time it occurres, if you are knocked out that's not going to help either. Automatically applying the brakes as soon as an airbag is deployed shoud be standard on any new vehicle. Especially those who can already brake automatically.
Auto-pilot on the Model Y "I have determined that his vehicle is drivable. Scheduling your appointment at Telsa service center, with three super charger stops, one stop at Starbucks, and five stops at flannel shirt stores enroute to your destination. Enjoy this David Bowie song"
The Tesla battery would be dead by the time the driver could get the Starbucks order lmao
3/4 wheels are operating. Good enough for Elon.
@@elmfuzzy1 Says you. Tesla have at least 300+ miles of range, that is more than enough for me
That thing would be a fireball in 30 mins after that accident
The barrier stood up really well!
& the mag wheels on the chariot as well .
Wow that model Y took the impact incredibly well
The BRZ is a top safety pick too though. Crumpling is good if it keeps the driver safe.
@@CIARUNSITE nope
I noticed the Teslas for some reason all take it really well. The Model X was the first SUV to be rated 5 stars in safety.
My theory is the fact that it doesn’t have engine, gas etc there’s less energy that’s needed to be transferred so it’s not going to be under as much stress as the other vehicles.
@@twisterman101new4 check out the volvos. They do that test even better and they have ICE's.
@@twisterman101new4they have batteries that are heavier than combustion engines. i would think that electric cars have even more energy to transfer being heavier than their ICE counterparts
I love the higher angle from behind watching the cars slide past the barrier.
Also, I love how the Tesla basically drove in the other direction after hitting the barrier. Lol
that's good for the Tesla's passengers, slower deceleration
@@ness2965 Yeah I think it's due to weighing a lot. It deflected instead of losing most of its speed like the lighter cars.
@@ness2965 yeah right into another car.
@@Clockwork0nions Yeah, a sudden stop would be much better than hitting another car. Much better for your organs.
@@Mindphaser98
Who is saying it should stop suddenly? No other car does that, they do however not veer off in random directions after the crash like the Tesla does.
But I'm sure your internal organs would love getting hit again in another accident :)
That Jeep tried everything it could to stay upright.... including signalling left with it's turn signal 😂
Yeah but truthfully both blinkers came on, I think the hazards kicked in.
Hazard lights turn on automatically when u do very agressive brake or crash.
@@civertron9784 Or tip over ? :)
@@MyGoogleRUclips nope, a lot of new cars do it, not only jeep.
My wife was deadset on getting a Wrangler until I showed her this video
the wrangler did good though?
I'd take the Bronco any day, better design and overall quality, has pretty much the same off-road capabilities and it's much safer! I love the new Bronco.
@@carter8292 the Wrangelr got a score of "marginal", and the write-up essentially says it was entirely because of the rollover amd the fact that that's unsafe
@@carter8292 It rolled over and has no side airbags, making it the worst performing car in this video.
Depends on how you define "off road". For rock crawling and such, no. For driving to Starbucks (which is what both are mostly used for), the Bronco is superior @@SuperCarGuy2007
I’m honestly shocked the BRZ did so well. Small sports cars tend to be crunchy, but that new chassis is super well engineered for safety as much has handling.
The older 2012 BRZ was ratet 5 stars in the ancap aswell
Worst car to be in. It stopped dead and bounced. Internal injuries. The Tesla was amazing, it just ricocheted.
@@Ratboy2004 I would say the Tesla was just as bad for the opposite reason, because it keeps rolling it puts other vehicles in danger or could veer off the roadway. You don't want the vehicle to stop too quickly but you do want it to stop
@@Ratboy2004 bouncing isn't bad, if the rear goes up in a crash, it sucks alot of energy from the impact transfering it in rotational energy, crashing in an BRZ or GT86 always looks ugly but it is actualy safer than some other cars
@@Shwobblywobbly I’d rather spin in a small car than roll or lift life that Jeep.
Looks like IIHS are experimenting with new video ideas!
The music really makes this
Can we all appreciate how clean the barrier is after each crash?
They repaint it after every crash. Exactly where the vehicle impacts must be noted. Not repainting it just wouldn’t work for that.
The ford bronco KILLED it… OJ would be proud
Lmao
The Model Y after the impact pretty much said “I don’t need 4 wheels to stay functional!”
It was a looney tunes style one half stops dead the other half keeps going style crash
I just picture the occupants getting hit by another car after that. It was carrying a lot of speed still post crash
''batteries not included''
That jazz is going pretty hard lol
The Model Y looked very embarrassed and went into it's own corner at the end 😂😂😂
wow Tesla model y is truly impressive.
@@SimonWoodburyForget great info makes a lot of sense. never realized how heavy they are
Yeah, no. That’s all nonsense. The bronco and model x are within 500 lbs of each other. The x just performed better here by deflecting off the barrier. And there are a million examples of non deforming potential things one could hit while driving.
@@SimonWoodburyForget You do realise we all have access to the manufacturer specs right? The Tesla Model Y tested here only weighs 4282 pounds, less than many vehicles.
Please stop making up things.
@@SimonWoodburyForget you’re moving the goal post. First your issue was weight. Turns out the Y isn’t even the heaviest vehicle in this video. Then your issue is ‘likelihood’ of the scenario? If I had to pick any vehicle in this video to ride in during this test it would absolutely be the y.
@@Tyrial7 4282 lbs? Jeez. What’s even crazier is the Tesla model s plaid weighs almost 5000 lbs and it’s not even a suv. It’s a freaking family sedan.
its clear why the model y is the safest car on the road
Jeep sure knows how to put on a show!
It’s in Jeeps nature to rollover
0:21 Oohhh!! That view from underneath!! I’d love to see more of that
🤨
Me thinking after watching the wrangler rollover on driver-side small overlap test - "I mean it's obvious, it's a SUV with high center of gravity, it will rollover."
Then Bronco comes in - "Hmm..."
I thought that was interesting too. Looked it up and the Bronco is a few inches wider and shorter in the base model which probably improves its center of gravity a bit.
@Miguel Abrego It also appears it was designed so when this impact occurs, the crumple zone functions in a way that drives the vehicle into the ground, rather than rebound up into the air. Very well designed!
@@fifedog30 notice how it rotates downward. Looks like it's working
Dang I’ve been watching y’all’s videos for over 10 years - and will keep watching!
Well done IIHS!
Socialism. Cancel all their funding. Safety laws are bad for business. Especially air quality. (Sarcasm)
yall are getting spicy with the camera work. i loved the dolly stop under the jeep. thanks for what you all do
Fun fact: The Chevrolet Spark was made in General Motors in South Korea
Just like the Trax
True. The predecessor to the Chevrolet Spark was the highly succesful Daewoo Matiz, of which most cars were made in Craiova, Romania.
@@legioner9 in the US it was called the Aveo, and US market ones were made in Korea as well.
@@puckcat22679 Funny, here in Europe and Romania, the Aveo was a small sedan or hatchback based on it, different from the Chevrolet Spark 2007, or 2013. The "european" Aveo got one of the worst results ever in the front crash test. It also looked very ugly. Spark 2 and Matiz are nice little cars.
Thanks for keeping us safe
Can we get some teslacam footage from that model y?
I have a feeling the institute still uses a high-speed film camera to record the 2013 Spark crash test. I don't know when was the last time the Institue shot on film.
January 6, 2023 11:06PM
I wonder how the executives of this serious organization react to so many people watching their videos knowing many of them aren’t looking to buy these cars and are just watching the videos because they find them interesting
Test the MX-5 Miata please. The structure is unchanged since the 2015 on-sale date and there are a lot of them running around these days. EU tested it at four-stars a while ago but your tests are evaluate metaphorically wider and deeper than theirs.
They can’t since it doesn’t have a fixed roof and side curtain airbags
@@MuradAsifishere67 Hi, are those actual requirements that you read about?
@@MuradAsifishere67 it has seat airbags, tho. I think the Miata scored a 4 star only because of no serious active safety enhancements.
The Wrangler having only one airbag in 2022 is just shameful, especially when the Bronco manages to have side curtain airbags.
Idiots who don't off-road buy them and highway drive an off-road vehicle. Off-road vehicles do not require airbags if you use them for their intended trail purpose.
@@stevenslouber4947you still need to drive the off-road vehicle on-road to get to off-road though…
@@stevenslouber4947 Airbags can be dangerous when off roading sometimes they inadvertently go off and can injure you and cause loss of control. Luckily its not that hard to disable them.
Well done! 🎉
Model Y: "ight imma head out"
Hahaha!
oooh an IIHS rewind... I like it haha
Jeep; “What, you don’t want your Wrangler to yeet itself over a guardrail after a crash? ..that’s just boring.”
Love the Jazz! Good to see you’re having a little fun with this one!😂
happy new year! thank you for everything!
Wow. I have watched a bunch of these videos and the Wrangler is the first and only vehicle I have ever seen roll over on this test.
The Jeep flipping over after hitting a perfectly flat obstacle is very Jeep
Awesome music!!! Who's riffs are those??
The windshield on the Tesla didn’t even break.
I'm loving these more casual videos
Tesla and Volvo (and a very few others... even the Bronco here made an attempt) have perfected that beautiful side-stepping deflection on the small overlap test.
This is actually not a good thing. The Subarus do crash tests the best.
The car should stop moving and proceed to go nowhere after impact.
Imagine this you're driving down the highway in the right or left lane, you get into this type of accident while trying to avoid someone slamming on the brakes.
In your Subaru the car basically stops all momentum and comes to rest fairly rapidly. In another vehicle you have a glancing blow however in both cases the cars are now dead and undrivable. Meaning you might also have lost brakes or the ability to apply the brakes.
So I'm your Chevy Spark or Ford Bronco you continue to roll into traffic and most likely cause more injury and accidents. In the Subaru the car comes to an immediate halt and gives the motorist a stationary vehicle which they can avoid. Where a rolling vehicle will be a hazard that you have to guess which direction it will go.
@@STR33TZK1NG That's not true, in the case of a Tesla in real life AP would stop the vehicle immediately but this was a crash testing so...
@BukuiZhao yep the block all the sensors and cameras to see how safest the cars are and tesla model y is the safest car in the world according to the EU
as usual, the jeep scores a horrid 1 out of 5
Great jazz track for this compilation!
I actually have a very good idea of why the JL Wrangler did this. The metal supports for the front bumper end right where the headlights are at. The front end is also narrower than the body and tapers, so even though the fender flares make it just as wide it's not all structural. The Bronco interestingly on models that don't have the Sasquach package have removable front and rear impact bars in the wheel wells. It may be they discovered this would be a flaw in certain accident scenarios and added them in the models that they would clear. The Bronco also lacks the front end taper so it's far less narrow at the point of impact on this test, which is 25% overlap unlike the 50% they used to test with. With the steel bumper on my JL I feel like the chances of a roll over in this type of accident is far less. But I'm curious what would happen with a Sasquach Bronco without the impact bars they have extended in the front, and at the rear part of the wheel well near the foot well of the cabin.
BORING!
@@shanebailey9128 ok, just trying to throw a theroy out there.
@@shanebailey9128 Somebody is just trying to give a helpful theory, why do you need to shout out like that?
Love it! This is so random 😭😭😂
Music choice is on-point
Great soundtrack production crew.
Awesome video.
You guys should really do testing on 3rd row safety, as a father looking for a new car with 3rd row seating, I cannot find anything on what the safest cars are in this category
What was that grille / cage looking device on the Bronco left rear door?
It interrupted the deployment of the side curtain airbag.
0:01 Sliding with the Skat....e......
.. didn't know the Spark had such a big audience, specially after 10 years since that car got tested lol.
Very cool camera angles on the jeep
Right? Even got to see the underside.....
Can you compare your crash tests to NHTSAs and Euro NCAPS?
That Tesla was like "I'll just leave this here, byeeeee"...
The music for these crash test didn’t have to go so hard but it did. ❤
That wrangler looks dangerous! I'll just stick to my Samurai.
Would the panel that impacted the top left of the drivers head from the airbag deploying in the Tesla cause any harm to the driver? It seems like it left a decent paint mark on the part but at the same time looks like a very light and flimsy part.
props to the small overlap impact barrier for being tougher than old boots
That Tesla had like zero body deflection and just got pushed away, really nice. Everything else kind of got lodged and spun.
What is that wall made out of? Solid titanium?
Seems like the test was designed so that the driver's head would go towards the area not reached or least protected by the front and lateral airbags (kind of a worst-case scenario head-on collision).
Excellent summary.
“Imma wait right here”
-Tesla wheel
It's cool seeing how the spark and Tesla deflect the impact around the side of the car to reduce the shock of slowing down
the music made this so much better
New Wrangler is even worse than the 2020 Wrangler. In the 2022 version, the side airbags do not even deploy and are likely to seriously injure the lower leg/foot.
January 6, 2023 11:07PM
Every Wrangler has been terrifying.
January 6, 2023 11:38PM
Why the heck u need to add time and date to your comment?
Wrangler safest vehicle by far
Bold of them to assume Jeep Wrangler owners wear seatbelts, keep doors installed, or drive near the speed limit
The Tesla deflected well because of the massive battery weight distributed across the floor pan in the middle of the car
People in England: "Smashing!"
Side curtain airbags are one of the best inventions to date without a doubt
Why do the test vehicles have the headrests removed? Isnt that a confounding variable to how the dummies show injuries?
I was wondering the same thing! The seat definitely affects the safety.
IIHS has a separate evaluation for head restraints. Dummies are designed for specific crash modes, so we wouldn't get any useful information from a frontal crash test dummy during the rebound. Our cameras need to be able to clearly see the airbag interaction in this test so we remove the head restraints.
@@iihs-hldi makes sense, thanks for the informative reply! Ive always wondered that.
@@iihs-hldi which cars test the safest?
@@allterrainrandy2587 teslas are pretty safe
funny things: 0:06 ow jk ima get up bye 0:20 oopsie i fell 0:23 why are you chasing me 0:44 oo got a lil dizzy 1:07 i know how to back away so bye 1:30 why am i here 1:50 SIKE I'M OUTTA HERE
And yet, a Tesla flys off a 250 foot cliff in California with 4 people inside and everyone lives.
The guy bought the wrong car for the job.
He should have bought a convertible & convert it to lap belt only.
@@qx4n9e1xp exactly
Great soundtrack😊
It might be useful for IIHS to film some crash tests at 65, 80, and 90 MPH, to show people what could happen to them if they are going highway or faster speeds, hiand hit a guard rail or bridge abutment.
We did some tests a couple of years back with AAA at 50 and 56 mph to demonstrate how small increases in speed can lead to big changes in outcome due to the exponential increase in energy. You can see those here: ruclips.net/video/tZChyjaqNBI/видео.html
I get the weirdest vibe with the jazz overlay. But I like it lol
It was cool how the model Y kinda steered away during the crash
What is the red light for that’s attached to the driver seat and hood?
Model Y's test was like when you didn't get a satisfying crash in BeamNG.
Why are the seats different? I noticed the Model Y seat isn't the one on the road in fact there is no headrest at all.
they explained that in another reply: seat interaction of the dummy is not part of this test, but Airbag interaction is. they want to see clearly how the dummy impacts the Airbag, so they remove the headrests for this test (or i guess when it is integrated swap out the seat)
It was good to see the Chevy Spark tested! Thank you
The bronco didn't rollover? I'm surprised ig
Both the ford and tesla would be back on used markets; *to cause terror for the new owners*
Hi, I’d like to apply for the test dummy position.
Jeeps are only safe when they're broken and can't drive. Luckily... that's most of the time!
Where do you get the other angles for the crash?
They put cameras all around
The Tesla was in FSD mode at the time of the crash test.
Wow thanks god bless
Small overlap Wrangler crash tests never get old
bronco wrangler
compare at once :)
Only one thing makes sense that price differential between them.
I really want to know why a 12 year old car was so high on the list. Is there a huge market for the Spark that I didn’t know about?
Its just one of the IIHS’ most popular videos ever, i think at #2 or 3
Its a body on frame top heavy vehicle with solid axle... Don't expect it to stay up right.
It isn't that. Maybe a part but it truly flipped because the taper on the front end. Plus the face those wheel covers aren't structural at all
When are the results coming for the upcoming top safety picks
We'll announce 2023 TSPs in late February