It is *ABSOLUTELY* ludicrous for Disney to try and block that lawsuit like this. Imagine if one of your family members died at Nintendo World and you try to sue Nintendo for it, only for them to basically say "Sorry, you bought Nintendo Online once in 2018 and thus agreed to never sue us for anything, ever." This is downright near dystopian levels of corrupt corporation.
Exactly. Whoever came up with the idea in the first place and whoever got it approved, should be held personally accountable as well. The house of the mouse seems to be a real pest.
So, Disney says "You agreed to have all disputes go through arbitration. In Disney's book, that strongly suggests that "I used a Disney product and it KILLED my wife." is something within the realm of acceptable possibilities when engaging in consumption of Disney products.
Imagine slipping and falling in a Whole Foods and being told you can't sue them because you have an Amazon Prime account. Utterly insane. The precedent this would set if Disney even slightly wins is unfathomable.
The thing is they will probably win on the arbitration part because it was agreed upon when buying the tickets. now will they get away scot free no they will likely have to pay him a good amount of money in the pain and suffering category but sadly the allergy part will fall into the the " coffee is hot" column in the well known fact the no dish is ever allergy free from a commercial kitchen unless you've cleaned down your kitchen and sanitized EVERYTHING between each and every dish which no kitchen can or will do.
Law student here. Arbitration is such a huge cancer in consumer and employment contexts. It’s never truly neutral, because the more powerful party is a repeat player with advantages like prior experience with an arbitrator, getting to pick the arbitrator, and, of course, way more money for lawyers in the arbitration. People often don’t know what arbitration even is when they sign these agreements, let alone have a strong comprehension of how agreeing to arbitrate would affect them.
Holy shit, literally, it’s all I see now a days. And all these people are so god damn dumb and are flabbergasted when something happens to them and find out that company or what ever they support will do what ever takes to fuck then over and doesn’t give a shit about them, other then getting there money.
I’ve mentioned this quite a few times now in previous comments but I’ve worked as a chef for nearly 10 years now. You absolutely can not take the risk with allergens. We are responsible for our food and clearly the proper precautions weren’t taken. The idea that you can’t sue a company that killed your wife, one of the largest companies on earth, is so mind numbingly idiotic I don’t even have words for it. The chefs and Disney itself should be held responsible. Even if it was a horrific mistake, that needs to be known. Fuck Disney
The strange thing to me is that the restaurant isn't being sued? Technically Disney is just the landlord and Raglan Road rents space at their shopping district. It's absolutely insane their lawyers are choosing this argument vs the simple one that they are a landlord and not owners or operators of the restaurant. Mind-blowing stuff.
@@janelliz I don’t know too much about the specifics and how the law works in America but from what I can see they’re still considered Disney employees hence why Disney is being sued. I could be wrong on that tho. I imagine they’re going for this argument to try and set an extremely fucked up legal precedent and I imagine if it does actually go before a jury they’ll use the “we’re just the landlords” argument. However I think because the restaurant is in a Disney park and because of the PR damage that their current argument has caused, they won’t win that. And I suspect their lawyers know that. I personally think no matter how you cut it, this whole situation is an absolute nightmare for Disney. But, you don’t get to be a multi-billion dollar company by being ethical. This is far from the most fucked up thing Disney has done
My friend’s daughter has those same allergies and this is absolutely terrifying. It’s no joke. We can’t touch her if we’ve touched dairy unless we wash our hands thoroughly with soap and water first. The fact that they asked multiple times and informed them she was allergic and it wasn’t just a preference is grossly negligent.
@@shaesmith2831they’ll settle out of court if this tactic doesn’t work (and I sure as hell hope it doesn’t!). We likely won’t hear of the case again if this gets struck down. I hope the husband doesn’t settle and takes them all the way to a jury, but at the same time, legal cases are exhausting so I hope if he settles he gets millions and millions because nothing will bring his wife back. 😔
@@shaesmith2831They aren't Disney employees but 3rd party partners. They are owned by Paul Nolan and John Cooke and operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida. Their employees aren't employeed or hired by Disney. Now Disney does have stricter than usual lease terms giving them a higher level of control over their tenants but ultimately the businesses are in charge of hiring and training their staff. Attempting to use this clause to arbitrate the case is ridiculous but I don't think they should be the focus of the suit.
Disney sued my small-town high school because our mascot kind of looked like one of their characters. They won, and we lost our art program. Horrible company and I feel awful for the husband. Disney's response to that lawsuit is so absurd.
They sued a daycare over a mural. Universal said F U and went and painted them a new one with thier charters. For that alone, Universal won a spot in my heart.
My partner was in a terrifyingly similar situation at Disney with a waiter who didn’t BELIEVE in food allergies. My partner and his family explained to the waiter about his allergies, he said it’d be fine but didn’t write anything down. Food came out and they asked again. He assured them it was fine, even though they could SEE one of his allergens on his plate. Afterwards, they went to the manager and explained, “that guy is going to kill somebody.” A couple years later, they went to a different Disney restaurant and saw the same waiter working the floor. Immediately walked out. There is no reason for this to have happened and I cannot image the pain and absolute rage the poor family is feeling right now.
Coming across one of those “I don’t believe in allergies” waiters is my worst nightmare. Thankfully my allergy isn’t fatal (technically an intolerance) but the symptoms will last for hours and are extremely debilitating. The fear of food being contaminated with an allergen is something everyone with a food allergy understands, and it’s why many of us rarely eat out. It’s not something to play around with. Especially when nut allergies are known to be extremely life threatening.
That’s scary to see a dangerous employee appear at a different location. With all the ways to track a person’s digital identity, it’s awful to read about stories like yours where people aren’t added to a list to not hire in service industries, etc.
Disgusting- sure... appalling suggests an element of surprise- since you are apparently ignorant of how terrible Disney is, so you find it appalling- the vast majority of people who have worked a real job or had the misfortune of working for Disney are not appalled, just tired.
@@alienboy1322probably employees who did it on purpose when asked repeatedly. I know it sounds crass, but I've seen pretty cruddy underpaid waiters who would mistake that kind of repeating herself for snobbyness and condescension and do a sheet thing, not understanding the consequences7
Reminds me of the airline blaming kids for being filmed in the bathroom. Lawyers trying to win at all costs with no thought to PR or the fact they are probably going to piss off the judge/jury
I think they're just going for a longshot to create the precedent. The better defense is that they don't own the restaurant that served the guy's wife. It would be like a guy killing someone and then suing his landlord. I don't know how it hasn't been thrown out already.
Re: That tweet trying to throw Justin Baldoni under the bus, apparently Colleen specifically befriended him and wanted him to direct and star, even when he wasn't himself sure about being the lead in the movie. If Justin's to blame for a bad movie being made from a bad book, some of that blame should be thrown at Colleen herself.
Looking at the earlier drafts to the film, it becomes clear that Justin had a very different idea for the film. It appeared to be much more grounded and centred around the issues of DV. It is possible the divide has come from the intervention from Blake pushing the more aesthetic look we now have for the film
@@elliesmith7410 I'm waiting for more information, but rn that's the vibe I'm getting. It seems like from conception the book has had controversy since Colleen markets her books like romance novels, when It Ends With Us is more about DV from what I understand (I confess I haven't read it and don't plan to.), she even got heat for attempting to release a coloring book based on the book (about DV). From what I've seen all of Baldoni's press has been about wanting to do such a serious topic justice, meanwhile Blake has been about girl movie summer and wearing florals and not mentioning DV at all (which I mean, fair-ish? DV probably doesn't sell movies, but then why make and/or star in a movie about that book if you don't want to be in movies about serious topics?). Blake has only just now levied some accusations at Justin, and so far they still make him seem like a pretty stand up guy imo. I think the instinct to assume the guy is at fault is a prejudiced but not completely unfair one given celebrity men's general track record, but in this case unless some bombshell news comes out it seems like they're throwing Justin under the bus here when he didn't do anything that should require all the cast ghosting him.
Citizen of India and specifically West Bengal (the state where the r*pe & murder happened) and I'm so grateful this is getting some international coverage. Doctors have been asking for protection for decades now. Maybe international shaming will move the needle. But I also want to add that in this specific case, the violence was very personal and utterly gruesome. There are details coming out now that points to gng r*p and violent beating of her body post death. It also looks like an active cover up is going on which is stoking the protests. I really hope the murdered doctor gets justice, but most of all I hope we get strong laws to protect doctors now.
I want to say that it will change; but corrupt police, corrupt doctors, corrupt lawyers; corrupt judges; corrupt ministers - who is going to do anything? The average Indian citizen (being uneducated, culturally backwards and care more about their family status) will most likely say it’s the doctor’s fault; so no help there! This is the second internationally reported ‘gang r!!p’ and since then, what has changed? Nothing! Until the civil systems are repaired there will be no justice. I am scared for India and its ppl.
Hi there, I'm very curious on the matter. I wonder if there's security in hospitals in india. because people are much less likely to make a report if there isn't someone in the immediate area to report to or ask for help in the moment. And it's preventative too, maybe it wouldn't happen in the first place if there was always someone on hand to hold people accountable. By no means does having security or not justify people being harmful, i'm just asking the question.
@@vivalanina There are but it's ineffective and in this case the perpetrators weren't outsiders breaking in, it was people who already had access to the hospital.
@@vivalanina hospitals do have cctv in hospitals here. But this incident has political strings attached to it. Mere days after the rpe, the hospital tore down the walls of the room where it happened under the guise of "renovation". The police claimed it a suicide, and the Minister of the area is victim blaming. The local govt keeps trying to cover it up for some reason...
@speedy01247 yeah think this shouldn't hold up in court. Some rights you just can't sign away and if there's gross negligence no amount of legal waivers will save them. Like legal waivers are for reasonable foreseeable risks, its not a get out of jail free card or something....
The worst part about the Disney thing is that it doesn't matter if you at any point unsubscribe for whatever reason, they're gonna be like "oh but you were subscribed, you did accept that clause all those years ago, can't get out now"
I'm no lawyer but that seems like a breach of contract to me. If you unsubscribed you are no longer obligated to follow the conditions of the contract. I don't think contracts are allowed to be held in perpetuity.
Only in America would a company even dare to make the ridiculous argument that signing up for a free trial of their service means you can’t sue them for wrongful death from a different service.
not only is it wrongful death of a different service... his wife isn't the one that signed the agreement in the first place and hes suing on her behalf iirc
Maybe a hot take but men should absolutely be involved in conversations about DV, and they should be allowed to tastefully and consciously make movies discussing the topic. Men too are not only victims of DV, but they are also related to or have relationships with women who have in some way experienced abuse. Our conversations about relational abuse mean nothing if men are not in the room. And maybe the director didn’t agree with the PR, which is why he’s not getting involved with it… I feel like people are too quick to assumptions based on preset narratives.
I agree. There is no evidence to suggest that he was a bad person. I think some people just make up stories in their head and believe it. It’s so much easier on the internet. It wouldn’t hurt people to stop and think about what they’re saying, and how it could affect others.
DV relationships often go both ways, men get abused too. I understand that current culture makes a lot of men somewhat immature and ignorant on how bad DV is (even when they are experiencing it) but how do we expect people to understand things better if we lock them out of the conversations. I know most men do not like DV and would genuinely help anyone in that kind of situation but when they are only allowed superficial knowledge on it because their voices are shut down in these areas it only makes the men who want to help not notice when someone needs help and then men who've been a DV victim feel like their story is not only worth less but it doesn't matter either
you don't have to have your voice heard in order to listen to the voices of others. that being said, I would agree some male voices speaking about DV against men, is something we should listen to.
@@GarrettK24I would flip it and say the reason why he’s distancing himself is because of Blake. There are a number of interviews from the press junket for the film where Blake just glossed over anything relating to the serious undertone for the film. From what I’ve seen of Blake (could not care any less for any of her films) she’s not a nice person and very self centred making everything about her
I wonder if this is a case where Disney is the parent company? Disney has their hands in more than just movies and theme parks, so restraint chains could be one of them. I also have to wonder if it's on the park (not sure,haven't been to Disney World) if they take most of the liability
Im from India. Women's safety is questionable here.Almost all women I've met here, including myself have faced harrasment and sexual abuse, some face it on a daily basis. What happened to the female doctor is horrific, the hospital administration & police are trying to hide evidence. It's frustrating this political hypocrisy, 50% voter's are women, yet the clutch hold of patriarchy is so strong at grassroot levels. I hope the doc receives justice ASAP
When I heard about the news I teared up a little. It's so unfair! She was there to help and what did she get in return??? And to think the authorities are hiding evidence like wtf??? I hope her death and suffering were not in vain. As a victim myself I wish you safety and a better life.
@@PhimbleG-d People wont talk about it because you'll just be labeled a racist in this brave new progressive world- but that doesn't bother me. There is a massive problem with the way Indian men are raised and the culture towards women, they are seen as objects. Ive seen Indian boys as young as 5-6 pin a female classmate against the wall and try to start tearing clothes off.. very strange and sickening behavior. Ive never seen it so young with any other group of people. I live and work in a very diverse area, only about 40 of my 200 students are white. They all come from different backgrounds, some immigrant parents some native, some ghetto some rich- Ive seen it all. You start to notice certain patterns and behaviors.
With It Ends With Us, the main problem is the book itself and Colleen Hoover. Honestly just Colleen in general, almost all of her books romanticize toxic relationships but she advertises them as romcoms. I read it a few years ago and was shocked because I had no idea it dealt with such a serious subject. I really worry that people who are survivors or victims of dv might go into the movie thinking it’s a fun lighthearted movie and could end up being triggered and re-traumatized because of this carelessness. Idk what happened between Justin and the rest of the cast but at least he is accurately promoting the movie for what it is.
So like I just recently read the book and yeah it can be shallow here and there, but is it really romanticising it if they don’t actually end up together ? Not to mention being “in love” with said “abuser” plays a big role in why its difficult to part ways with such people? Imo but idk much about colleen
I'm gonna preface this by saying I'm not supporting this weird movie at all, but that the culture of trigger warnings is actually more harmful than good. It's meant to protect people, but doesn't help in any way.
@@DoobieKeebler I know that it helps me to prepare myself mentally before I read something that may bring up to old feelings. I don't know about other people though.
@@DoobieKeebler idk man when I didn’t get a trigger warning for a book I ended up not sleeping properly for 3 months and was super skittish. Properly used they can help especially for people who don’t use trigger as a buzzword
The Disney restaurant was insane. I worked in Florida restaurants for years and we would NEVER EVER give allergen assurances. We could say "here are the ingredients" and sometimes "we can make your salad without tomatoes" but unless you've cleaned down your kitchen and sanitized EVERYTHING there is no way to guarantee no allergen contamination whatsoever. Even if *your* recipe doesn't include peanuts or milk, do you know for sure that every one of your ingredients doesn't and never came in contact before they reached you? This thing sounds like not only negligence, but gross negligence to make so many assurances. If I knew not to do that as a drive-thru robo person, I can't imagine how a fancy tourist restaurant wouldn't. They're trying to claim arbitration by bullshit because they KNOW they will lose the suit.
Allergies suck, but I think it's ultimately on yourself . Don't go out to eat if it could be that deadly . Imagine Mr.Glass suing everyone that bumps into him.
@@badgerbun bullshit take, if you ask and they assure you it's safe and they took the neccessary precautions. They lied to her face and killed her! All they had to do is tell the truth and she wouldn't have eaten there.
@@badgerbunBut its not mr. glass, because mr. glass is an imaginary person and to compare a situation in which a multibillion dollar company negligently killed an actual human person to a movie person in order to shift blame on the woman who was KILLED is kinda monstrous, actually.
@@DroseraNara the same take as "well ackhtually it was in the 84 page waiver and you signed it so I'm not liable!" some people actually live in their own little world Lol
I laughed when Phil quoted the Dr where she said:"when a woman changes her mind, she has the right to review her options" because why all of a sudden do women's choices matter when it comes to reversing abortions but not when wanting abortions
💯. It's hypocritical. It's only if it fits their agenda. Remember when the far right started chanting "my body, my choice" on wearing a 10 cent mask? But hate it when it actually involves a woman's choice to her own body?
Probably because of the implications No matter how much you convince yourself about a fetus not being alive and not having right, the mere thought of unborning something will never stop being icky
That a 150 BILLION DOLLAR company is fighting tooth and nails on a super shaky grounds to get a $50k lawsuit where THEY CAUSED A DEATH OF A PERSON dismissed is just mind boggling. That's next level of penny pinching
My exact thoughts, this is nothing for Disney, pocket change. How incredibly greedy and selfish. I hope they lose this and have pay the poor family even more
Dude wtf is that Disney story? "You signed up for a free 1 month trial for Disney+ in 2019 so when we end up messing up and that leads to your WIFE, your one and only beautiful wife, dying, as a DIRECT result of our gross negligence, you can't sue us" Wtf? Yea. No. This genuinely is a get away from Disney+ and cancel your subscriptions moment. That is disgusting and horrifying. Imagine that happens to you. P*racy looks more and more moral as the days go by.
I mean they tried to nab him with a 2019 free trial, not even an ongoing subscription. Its too late even if you decided you didn't like it 20 minutes later, too bad the mouse owns your soul.
The Disney story is like on South Park when they agreed to be in a human centipede because they agreed to the terms of service without reading it. We're seeing satire become more and more real every day.
The thing that really bothers me about the Imane Khelif story is how both sides are conflating intersex with trans. The IOC is literally saying, either she is trans, or not, and that there's no possibility she is intersex (and hence could be disqualified without any wrongdoing). Just goes to show you, if you're part of a small enough group of people, who don't fit into anyone's narrative, you can be completely erased.
Khelif isn't even intersex!! She's not trans, she doesn't have a chromosomal disorder or high testosterone. It's ALL made up. She's just a normal, tall, strong girl who learned to box because people bullied her for being tall and strong. Most of the people in her community told he shole couldn't box because she was a girl. Now she's being told she can't box because she's a man, and that's unfair to other girls. The people pretending to care about protecting and supporting women, are stepping all over the women who need the support.
I worked in a Disney kitchen for a while in 2018. They always walked this line where they'd say their food was allergen free, but they couldn't guarantee it hadn't been contaminated. The kitchen I worked out of had three restaurants running out of the same kitchen that served wildly different menus, so there was always a chance there could be at least trace amounts of allergens in the food. For example: the ice cream station that served peanuts was right next to the steamwell. The steamwell stations didn't have peanuts technically, but there were peanuts less than ten feet away from the production area. I'm genuinely surprised the employees were so adamant that the food was clear.
"surprised the employees were so adamant that the food was clear." SO says the family who lost a loved one. Unfortunately they are an unreliable narrator and we really can't say for sure what they said to the family or the family to them as both sides have their own take and it doesn't match.
@@samhainnc9416I haven’t looked into the story more, but in Phil’s coverage it never stated whether or not the allergen was actually found in the food she was served. Just that she had a reaction after eating, passed, and had the allergen in her system. Do you know if the food was tested and found to have the allergen in it?
@@MommyOfMutantsat the start of the segment, Phil says that they chose that restaurant because she had a deadly allergy to dairy and nuts, and the article on screen at 7:57 says that she had "very high" levels of nut and dairy allergens in her system when she died
@@bekichan91I know that and mentioned it in my comment. I was just wondering if they ever tested her actual food or found where/how the allergens got into her food. What she ordered doesn’t seem to have nuts in it ordinarily, so for her to have “high levels” in her system seems weird. Trace amounts from cross-contamination is one thing, but it seems like there was just full-on dairy and nuts in her food. Just wondering if they found out if it was in the food (ie. they never attempted to make it allergen-free), if it was from cross-contamination (ie. an accident happened in the kitchen somehow), or some other way entirely. She was also in another location/store when she had the reaction, could she have come into contact with something there? I’m just wondering if they knew exactly how she came into contact with the allergens, or how they had gotten into the food 🤷🏼♀️
@@MommyOfMutants I have the same allergy, so let me clear this up. She absolutely ate food that contained her allergens at that restaurant. The timing checks out, and all the epipens in the world will (most likely) not save you if you ingest enough of the allergen to override the epipens/antihistamines. Cross-contamination? Chances of survival are good-ish, but it's still enough to kill if ingested. Even a spoonful of an allergen can be deadly. Depending on the dish she was served, she might not have been able to smell or taste the nuts or dairy. The dish might have been cooked in nut oils, which would account for the high (but difficult to notice) nut content in the dish. And dairy is especially hard to detect through taste and smell when mixed with something else.
@@PresidentJackBauercause those documents are purposely built to be difficult to read, they were written by lawyers meant to be read by lawyers, a normal person might as well try to read a physics textbook and they'd understand around as much.
There have been a bunch of companies adding these arbitration clauses in the last year that pretty much say "if we do anything wrong, you waive your right to sue." How can this possibly be legal or in good faith to the consumer?
Because it hasn't been tested in any court and current law is often insufficient not keeping up though it's not like that's not been known. I'd heard there's been alot of this going on in the US. I note when I see 'updated TOS' in emails for whatever product I use there's either a separate US clause or a clause similar to 'X applies unless your country's laws don't allow for it' which they usually don't.
It's written like someone who got famous by grinding with his good ol boys and expects everyone else to give up their lives too while kissing their feet. Unfortunately it's more common then you'd think.
Disney is notorious for insane stuff like this. I can think of at least two times off the top of my head that they threatened legal action against grieving parents for wanting to put certain characters on their childrens headstones. The fact that this new act is baked into the fine print of Disney + contracts, even trials, is diabolical.
I'm from Kolkata and we had a huge turnout for "girls, reclaim the night" marches that we had at 12 am at many location points tonight. Just my location easily had thousands of people and other locations had even higher number of people all marching together. Everyone just walking together with signs or candles and shouting "we want justice". Tens of thousands of people walking and not a single person stepped out of line at any point. This was mainly for girls and groups of other marginalised orientations to "reclaim the night" as we've always been taught to avoid staying out or doing anything late at night, but people of all genders pretty much came out to march together in support. In my 30 years of life I have NEVER seen SUCH HUGE crowd of everyday people coming down to the streets for an issue. We're sick and tired. And we're also fucking done with this state govt clearly trying to hide the many more participants of this horrific crime one of whom is supposedly a powerful individual. They only arrested one individual and called it a night and also showed immense lack of transparency and competence at every step. A group of people also pretended to be a part of this protest march tonight and vandalised the R.G.Kar Hospital while all these marches were happening but it's laughable how they tried to frame the protesting crowd. There's high chances of things escalating further.
I am bengali but grew up in Delhi. My friends from kolkata tell me that the city never used to be like this. It was safe and women felt comfortable traveling in the city after hours. I always thought of WB as more progressive (compared to the North). This incident was heart breaking. Feels like we have no safe ground left in the country.
@@BusinessSkrub she was born a woman and the Russians lied about her chromosome count cause she beat their player and they got salty. Deal with it 😂🖕🏽
I've always thought the whole "you'll regret having an abortion" line is funny, because if you DO regret it then get pregnant again as most abortions are from accidental pregnancy or r***, but the regret of having a child is irreversible, you can't put it back and adoption is a nightmare... What's the bigger regret "oh, I can try again" or "I've got to raise this child for 18 years"?
@@Dloopgroop @Dloopgroop Listen to data. Among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from r*** each year. Among 34 cases of pregnancy from r***, the majority occurred among adolescents and resulted from assault by a known, often related perpetrator. Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the r***. A total 32.4% of these did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion.
@@Dloopgroop They said most abortions are from /accidental pregnancy/ or rape. Accidental pregnancies are inconvenient. Do you think most abortions happen because people intentionally get pregnant and /then/ go "oh, this is too inconvenient!" or did you just not actually read their comment?
@THEMrFill We're in the RUclips comment section of a news video that talks about the rape of a woman, you don't need to censor the word rape. No amount of censoring will remove the horrible nature of the act; the word is just a word, and avoiding using it does victims no favors when they feel they can't talk plainly about it.
@jennygenova7656 🤣 no r4p3 is barely 5 percent of annual stats nice try at blending those 2 one being 90 percent the other being 5. All murders are from humans and democrat leftists. All theft is from mammals and black people. All beastiality is from people and Phillip defranco. All hate crimes are from white people and homosapiens.
disney thinking they are now immune from lawsuits because of an arbitration clause, from any point in time, is incredibly funny. "yeah we killed your wife but uhh you agreed to not sue us so we're gonna lowball you some cash and if you don't take it you get nothing" if they think that'll fly, its kinda dystopian.
Yeah shit like that is illegal usually. For example certain liability waivers don't matter if it's a failure of the staff or neglect that caused the death. If a roller coaster crashes and it's found that they didn't do maintenance in months and knew there was an issue it doesn't matter if there is a waiver against Sueing.
"if they think that'll fly, its kinda dystopian" Sir the rich and powerful use NDA's to "pay" for their crimes all the time, it is dystopian. There is no fair government in the USA. In the words of former President Jimmy Carter: "The US is an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery."
What's crazy is this restaurant isn't Disney owned or operated, it's a 3rd party that leases the land from Disney and is in charge of hiring and training their own staff. This lawsuit gymnastics is insane and should be illegal but imo it should be the owners (Paul Nolan and John Cooke) and/or the operators Great Irish Pubs Florida being sued, not Disney.
I'd really like to see someone take Disney all the way. That senior accountant who worked 20 years at the parks sued for unfair dismissal when she brought dodgy park bookkeeping to Disney's attention which they ignored so she took it to the feds who said they'd investigate yet we heard nothing. She settled due to the stress of her husband taking his life ending that one. Now there's Carano's case and another entity going after them for DEI discrimination so I hope at least one gets to the courts or we'll never find out what they get up to. The 'you agree to arbitration' clauses in the US are currently being snuck in everywhere & need legal testing.
As a healthcare worker i hate that the story about the doctor being killed on the job doesnt surprise me considering how american patients have treated me as just a lab assistant. Ive been kicked, hit, spat on, patients try to bite me, stick me with my needles, so much and thats with decent security i cannot imagine how horrific working in a hospital without strong security would be.
What on earth? Haven't reached that story yet. I'm going to assume your patients intellectually disabled? If not, I cannot fathom what sane individual would stick needles into the person there to help them. Sorry for what you go through, hopefully you'll have better patients.
Assault is EXTREMELY common in any major hospital. You know those Ken's and Karen's that make life a nightmare for everyone else? They get sick, too. The crazy drug users that go into withdrawals and get violent, the anti vaxxers that have political rage against hospital workers. Or just people with anger issues that have never learned to deal with them, and know they won't face consequences because they're sick, so the public and legal system always side with them. There are a lot of violent people in the world.In fact, just in the US alone, 2 nurses are assaulted EVERY HOUR. Violence in healthcare is hardly exclusive to India
17:41 the DOD saying that supporting Israel is baffling to me. Why do we keep supporting a country that constantly spits in our face when we make demands to them? We have millions of homeless vets in this country and our infrastructure is deteriorating but yet we continue funneling money to a country that is actively conducting a genocide.
Palestine is no better. They're both countries run by a bunch of war criminals committing genocides daily. Your leftie news orgs haven't let you know about how bad Palestine is too, because it doesn't want you to stop screaming and crying against the Israelis. The antisemitism y'all support is WILD
Because 1. Israel is central to weapons R&D 2. Israel is our ally and a central foothold in the middle east 3. There isn't any g-cide. Helping the Israeli people defend their home against terrorism and the Iranian regime is a noble cause and we should be supporting that.
For the Blake Lively controversy, supposedly you left out that Baldoni’s cut of the movie did better with test audiences but apparently Blake and Ryan strong armed the studio into using her cut instead, and it seems like Blake is using her connections to become the lead producer for the movie. I’m honestly leaning towards Baldoni being in the right because he’s actually talking about the themes of the movie, while Blake is trying to shill her own companies instead of the movie. And she looks like trying to force a barbenheimer moment with deadpool by having Ryan and Hugh Jackman show up at the red carpet.
i would argue that telling women the abortion pill is reversible would encourage them to take it thinking they can still change their mind, thereby causing more abortions
I’d argue that taking it with the assumption that it can be reversed, changing your mind and then losing the baby would be much more harmful than making the decision one way or the other
Did you pause to read all the tweets???? it goes further than that and all of that info is from a 3rd party. Not the alleged victim or perpetrator. The "victim" didn't share a single thing that could be counted as evidence while the other side has evidence. I bet you also think Amber herd isn't an abusive partner who abused Depp smh
I always felt like it was insanely disrespectful to call a woman "trans" or a "man" just because she's a little bigger or stronger than a normal woman.
@@DrAngelKinsNo trans people literally didn't. Trans people just want to exist and have reasonable access to healthcare. Transphobia causing people to attack anyone who isn't perfectly feminine is the issue
@@DrAngelKinsNo, insane people like Rowling caused the issue. All the trans haters who are suddenly medical experts did, too. Trans people have warned everyone that this will hurt cis women as well. But nobody listened. If everyone and their mom would leave decisions to the experts, this mess would not exist.
Normal for ANY medical procedure? Probably work on that phrasing. It would be pretty alarming if 5% regretted getting stitches for a wound, their tonsils out, or a bone placement and cast for a broken leg.
Yup! PubMed has some articles about stuff like this. Their studies found a 14% regret rate across all surgeries and 8%-17% regret rate for having children. So a 5% regret rate for abortion isn't that bad.
CORRECTION: The below is for if police access geofencing data generally, but Phil said that geofencing WARRANTS are illegal, so police will likely have a much more difficult time accessing that data in the first place. ORIGINAL COMMENT: Lawyer here. For context on the Fourth Amendment issue. If the Supreme Court were to rule that police using geofencing data was barred by the 4th Amendment, that doesn't necessarily mean that they will stop using it to locate suspects. It does mean that they will not be able to use that evidence in court, which is still a huge win for protecting our rights. I did lots of research into the 4th Amendment in law school, and it is scary what police can get away with, despite it being unconstitutional. For example, if the police broke into your home without a warrant and found evidence of someone else committing a crime, the police could use that evidence in court against the other person (but not you), and you may have no remedy under the law for the violation of your rights. EDITS as of 8/15/2024: Fruit of the poisonous tree (Wong Sun doctrine): Some are bringing up the Wong Sun doctrine regarding fruit of the poisonous tree (i.e., evidence resulting from an illegal search is inadmissible). This does not rebut my illustration above. In the Wong Sun case (simplified), the police found drugs as a result of an unlawful search of Toy's laundromat. The drugs were inadmissible with respect to Toy because Toy's 4th Amendment rights were violated, and the drugs were found as a result of that violation (i.e., Toy was the victim). However, those same drugs were admissible against Wong Sun. To quote, "The seizure of this heroin invaded no right of privacy of person or premises which would entitle Wong Sun to object to its use at his trial." (371 U.S. 492) In other words, drugs were admissible in court against Wong Sun despite being a result of an illegal search against Toy because Wong Sun's rights were not violated in the illegal search. Clarification: When I say the police find evidence of someone else committing a crime in your home, I mean they search your home and find evidence that someone else committed a crime generally. Not necessarily that they found someone actively committing a crime in your home. However, either way, if that person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in your home (e.g., they are not living there), then their rights are not violated, and the evidence would likely be admissible. Remedy: When I say there is no remedy, I am talking specifically about vindicating your right not to be searched illegally. You may have a remedy for damage caused to the home (may depend on jurisdiction), but as far as vindicating your rights not to be illegally searched, there really is nothing beyond making any evidence against you inadmissible. This should give police no reason to search your home illegally as it would be useless for doing their job. However, if they did search your house illegally and find nothing on you, then there's really nothing you can do. So for the geofencing issue, police could still use it outside of court if they wanted to, but they would not be able to use it or anything that is a "fruit" of the geofencing issue in court. You would have no remedy for them knowing you were near the crime scene aside from having it dismissed in court if it got to that point. Note: I'm happy to engage in conversation, but I am not interested in engaging those who mistake ad hominem for legal analysis.
Not to be too political here but I agree with you 100% and the "constitutionalists" we see in power today are anything but. Barrett even argued that the 4th was "too wide for society to function". I personally believe there aren't any constitutionalists left, it's just a bunch of practitioners who dislike some amendments and enjoy others. If you care about letting every person have a firearm because of the second, the polices violation of 4th and 5th should drive you insane.
Are you sure you went to law school? You're forgetting the legal process required to just GET a warrant. If geofencing warrants are determined to be illegal, you just can't get that kind of warrant from a judge anymore.
When you say 'remedy' here. Like, getting money to fix any damage? Or something else If someone else is committing a crime in my house, 99% of the time, I want that person stopped
@@trunkageAre you sure? Because the crime committed could be something as mundane as a cop seeing your friend smoking marijuana. I wouldn’t want the cops to have legal grounds to arrest them in a house they don’t have warrant to enter.
Things i will add to the india case: is the state government and local authorities are actually doing absolutely everything to sweep this under the rug and cover up as much as possible. Its been suspected that the principal of the medical college was involved in the crime and its part of the larger R-'culture' at this college. the government, initially put him on a paid leave and then, simply transferred him to another college and the Chief minister Praised him?! Forensic reports say She was treated in a horrifying manner (her pelvis was broken, her spectacles crushed INTO her eyes) in her last moments and there were definitely multiple perpetrators. Yet when one man casually accepted charges and proclaimed he was the only perpetrator, the police happily accepted and tried to close case. This is after they initially tried to claim it as suicide!!! Suddenly, after it was announced that the CBI (indian equivalentof FBI) will take over the case from state police, thd college started "renovations" in the building, destroying the scene of crime. I just hope this can bring large scale reforms in the country. Doctors and women deserve to feel safe in their workplace.
Imagine being so much in the public eye that people check that you're NOT FOLLOWING SOMEONE BACK as confirmation there must be drama between you... what a nightmare
Funny how the tweets stopped when the lawsuit started. JK knows that you can't just spout lies without any evidence to back up your opinion. Glad someone is finally hitting back. Unfortunately for Joanne, Imane hits like a girl. 💙
Also there's the old interview for her Woody Allen film that just came out where she acts like a mean girl to the interviewer. And you've got the whole plantation wedding stuff
@@arianam6430so nobody is proven guilty either then lmao?? Lawyers just made enough of a case to convince everyone I guess. Wtf kind of logic lmao, y'all have absolute faith in the justice system when it convicts Trump or someone you don't like, but when it convicts one of "yours" it's excuse after excuse lmfao. Paper-thin cultists
@@saernst Not enough legal evidence =/= didn't happen. The standard of legal evidence is very high and many actively recorded assaults have had their perpetrator found not guilty. Guilty people get away with shit everyday, and innocent people are refused appeals on their death penalty, the US legal system is broken.
@@arianam6430 You're kind of right. In US law, we have this wonderful phrase. "Innocent until proven guilty". I know in recent years with the expansion of social media that everybody wants to form opinions of innocent or guilty instantly, but according to the court of law, being proven "not guilty" is the same as saying "you're still innocent"
I’m so curious about that 5% of people who report regretting their abortion. I want to know how many regret it because they actually changed their mind about wanting to be pregnant, and how many regret it because they were shamed for their decision.
Very good question! And I’m being for real with this addition. How many lied to themselves when polled or were praised by certain groups or friends instead of shame..?
Yep, this is a lot like statistics on folks that reverse their gender transitions. Most who reverse do so because their friends and family alienate them, not because “oh it turns out maybe I’m not a wo/man”
The idea that “a man shouldn’t have directed the film at all” when the two women in charge (producer with creative control and the author that wrote the damn thing) are out here pretending the movie is “50 first dates” is ungodly obtuse. Twitter doing what twitter does.
Regarding the wrongful death suit, SOUTH PARK WILL NEVER NOT CALL THESE THINGS. This Disney story has images of cuttlefish and vanilla paste popping into my head….
I suspect a lot of people critiquing Justin directing the movie do not know the work he has done challenging toxic masculinity. As a woman, I very much appreciate the important conversations he has on his podcast "Man Enough." I was incredibly excited when I found out he was directing the movie exactly because of his emphasis on needing to focus on why men behave in certain ways and understanding cultural norms rather than blaming women. With all the terrible rhetorical toxic masculinity stemming from the Red Pill movement, feminism needs men like Justin. Maybe there was drama on the set, I don't know. I will wait to judge until its more than speculation. I just don't like the idea of people trying to throw Justin under the bus after all the work he has been doing. I fear that type of response risks driving men to the Red Pill Movement rather than inviting them to participate in the feminist movement.
If his idea of helping women is putting all blame on men in unhealthy relationships, then I'm not listening. In her case I think it's ego. He was the director so what he says goes. That's the job. On the other topic I am tired of women not taking ANY responsibility for their own choices who want society to accept men in these situations are 100% to blame. Yes, men who cannot control themselves must take full responsibility for their actions but you only get away with what you're allowed to. We're seeing too often today those who refuse to accept any responsibility for their choices always casting around for someone/thing to blame for outcomes. It's not healthy and lessons can't be learned.
@@tkps What responsibility is a woman to take for being hit by an abuser? For being raped by a rapist? She did not do these things to herself. She did not ask for this to happen to her. Many women who have experienced SA experienced their first sexualization by adults before the age of 16. Your "take" is nothing but victim-blaming and exactly why this conversation should be had by people like Justin, not Blake.
@@BooksWithBourboni think he meant in general when relations dosnt work and there is toxic behavior from both sides, yeah, the point is talking specifically about SA cases and abusers, but an actual secret of culture manipulation, is that if you keep protraying real cases but just of a certain nature, people do generate reject and defense mechanism to general situations which often lead into hate speech and prejudice The solution for this is not stopping to protray these cases because the fact is that they are real and must be heard, but balance it by protraying cases of other nature so you dont (accidentally) push a resentment narrative over the people who consumes it
@@angelarce9747You mean like a love story? Telling women to take responsibility in a discussion about DV toward women is a disposable take. There is no other side to that. Now, if you're trying to say the cases of DV and SA toward men should also be discussed, absolutely! But that is not what the commenter said. Putting words into their mouth only furthers the victim blaming.
@@BooksWithBourbon i dont mean love story, i mean giving voice of speech for cases where: -The man is the one abused -there are abusive behavior from both part, but no one takes responsability because their toxic behavior is justified as a responde from the other's -gaslight (relation which there is no abuse at all but one of the part make it look like there was for the purpose for controlling the relation, basically victim blaming as abuse) And yeah, as i said, i know the target wasnt that, but specififlly dv against women, im just saying that the constant victimism (that is justified, ofc, im not negating) if just 1 type of case, can lead to hate incitement because resent is a damn strong feeling, no, it is not victim blaming cause im not saying these victims should be shout, ignored, not listened, or dismissed, im saying all cases should be given voice equally without any kind of bias so you dont end up influencing in the viewers moral compass, say, after the metoo wave with all the series and movies depicting male as abuser and female as victim most of the time developed an new wave of feminism with a very marked resent and reject towards male (ive have seen so many misandric shit in media lately) which caused incels to gain more relevance in society and now gender talks always end up in gender war, its kind of ironic that things made to help us reach equality separated us even further, but thats basically the reason, giving the false sense that there is a enemy in common for a large group of people given the lack of diverse messages of other cases as theyve been depicted as the wrong for most of their life so its normal they tend to assume so Idk if you get what i mean
Ahh yes, Faith Based Pregnancy Centers. My niece went to one after having a MISCARRIAGE. Rather than give her the D&C scrape or send her elsewhere they told her there was absolutely no need. She went into septic shock not long after. They are terrible people!
Pregnancy centers don’t normally offer D&C procedures as that is an actual procedure that uses general anesthesia most states only offer those at hospitals so I’m sorry your niece thought she could go there… I’ve had two miscarriages and I’ve always had to go through a doctors office that has you go to a consultation before they will even do the D&C and never have I ever had any pregnancy center ever offer those services and just to clarify so you know better in general the best option for miscarrying is to miscarry naturally(speaking from my own infertility journey) D&cs also carry risks and can also leave scarring in your uterus that can make future pregnancies harder so it’s unfortunately almost always doctors recommended to naturally miscarry if you can
@@ashicks it sounds like you have never had a miscarriage or been apart of the miscarriage community, nor is minding your business even a valid argument to someone sharing something that they actually have lots of experience with medical doctors who have been through infertility so how rude of you to try and tell someone who’s actually experienced loss and infertility to mind their business… there are plenty of arguments you could present based on facts of why maybe you don’t like pregnancy centers but the fact you can’t even have a civil discussion tells me you don’t actually have a valid argument or can handle people having different opinions then yourself
The It Ends With Us situation is ridiculous. Colleen Hoover books always romanticize the worse types of relationships. I was a fan in highschool and once I grew up realized they were terrible because of that. To me it feels like Justin tried to use the book and movie to tell a good story and Blake wanted to make another girl romance movie. Justin had been trying to make the movie for a while and fought for it now it been taken by other people. Obviously we will never know what happened behind the scenes but criticizing the person talking about DV as serious as it is while defending the people making light of it is insane.
How does It Ends With Us romanticizes abuse? Like Lily is naive to think her daughter is safe, but leaving an abuser is seeking freedom in a sense, even though she still has to worry. Just because Colleen doesn’t depict Ryle as a one-dimensional monster doesn’t mean she’s glorifying his actions. Blake is being weird promoting the movie as a rom-com. The whole “grab your girlfriends and florals” is Bryson’s tacky. I’ve seen two trailers for this movie and it does hint towards abuse, but it can be easily overlooked.
@@junkoe119 There is literally a promo for the book that is simply a picture of the cover and text that reads "Discover the stunning romance behind the hit movie". Hoover even tried launching a coloring book and nail polish line when the book came out. When people who love this book attack survivors because we don't call abuse love, we ask about what kind of therapy or aftercare the characters received in this story of healing, or explain that the trauma doesn't just go away but becomes a permanent part of us, there is something very wrong with the message.
I remember watching your show back when it was the best show that wasn't really a show, but was just you talking to the camera for 3 to 4 minutes. Yeah... yeah... My sister and i used to watch every new video you dropped back then. Thanks so much for being a part of my world!
Imane is so right to sue everybody's ass off on this one. We teach our kids that bullying, spreading rumors and treating other people badly is a big no, it's time we show there are consequences for grownups as well! I hope she's very successful with her lawsuit and ttgat she gets public apologies from everyone who did her wrong.
@@zachmondial2172 not that this rumor was proven to be true, but even if it was, genetics are a lot more complicated than that. If everyone had their chromosomes tested, I bet you MANY people would be surprised by the results. She is 100% in her right to sue, cyberbullying and diffamation are not okay and should be punished.
@@zachmondial2172 and how is this protected when its liable, its literally a lie that if those spreading the misinformation just stopped and looked it up would know it was a lie, which they probably already knew when telling said lie! Shes fron a country that is blatantly anti trans. Why would theu send a trans person to represent them in the Olympics!!!
@@zachmondial2172the first amendment doesn’t work that way, it doesn’t protect people who defame, incite harassment, or create libel. It’s also irrelevant because the USA’s laws aren’t the world’s laws. And have you considered like, looking up the XY thing before saying it? Or actually checking any of what you just said before saying it for that matter?
We knew Disney was evil but man this is on a whole other level. Besides Disney getting sued the restaurant staff needs to be charged because their actions were not negligence but indifference.
In this case she is wrong so yes it is deserved. However she has sued people because they have been telling lies about her. And there is still a lot of people who spread lies about her to make people hate her.
I am 10000000% for this lawsuit with Imane Khelif. People in these position of power need to held accountable. This will never leave Imane. She will always have to deal with these allegations now, no matter what the facts are.
It’s a dangerous premise she is stating. Now people from other country’s have to answer to foreign governments over tweets! I wonder when vlad will get his turn at Americans opinions about him?
Lol Jimmy wants to wait until all allegations are out there before he responds, so he can do a single blanket response. How many more allegations is he afraid of?
LMAO I think the reason why he said that is cause the only time he responded was about Kris being a pedo , he had a team write some bullshit response where he basically was like my bad y'all I didn't know and then it got revealed in the discord leaks that uh he in fact DID 💀💀
honestly a lot of the things that has been brought up hasn't been proven at least imo, that lava guy is pretty much all ive seen been confirmed. kind of get his point of view if he can disprove a bunch of stuff, if a new thing pops after he will either A have to make yet another video or B look guilty.
I wouldn't be so worried about the Disney lawsuit argument if it weren't all happening in Florida. As much as Florida hates Disney, they hate poor people even more. So I'm a bit concerned this will end up setting a completely insane precedent.
I used to work at Raglan Road and they were always extremely cautious about allergies, having many trainings solely dedicated to allergy management. I’m shocked hearing about this news and really wonder what went wrong in their procedure. This situation is heartbreaking, even more so that Disney’s legal army got involved to add insult to fatal injury. My heart goes out to the family.
Missouri here. They made abortions illegal in '22, and now we're trying to get abortion rights enshrined in our Constitution. As a father, with two very young daughters, I'll be voting, yes, and I hope it passes.
But.... It's not forced abortions? Allowing abortions doesn't mean that a cabal of lefty lesbians will burn an effigy to abortion on your lawn & force you to abort your 4 year old daughter. It's shockingly not about you.
But.... It's not forced abortions? Allowing abortions doesn't mean that a cabal of lefty lesbians will burn an effigy to abortion on your lawn & force you to abort your 4 year old daughter. It's shockingly nit about you
It is the boomerang effect. They tried to ban same sex marriage in MN. The Momentum of the resistance got same sex marriage officially allowed in Minnesota
I bought into all the 'women who have abortions regret it and are more likely to kill themselves' stuff that the pro life crowd put out in commercials back in the 90s. So when I chose to have one I expected a serious depression to hit me, but all I felt afterwards was the absolute certainty that I made the right choice. Now, years later, I still feel good about my choice.
@@davidhansen9792 It fun how you can comment about your personally experience and someone will always jump in to point out that other people might have different experiences. No kidding. That's why my comment was about mine. But while we're here, I do believe the claims of pro-lifers are exaggerated.
How is abortion ever a good choice when adoption is always a choice? And to have the absolute gall to announce your actions in a comment section populated with young people that are easily influenced is just gross. Youll report me but it was worth saying my piece. Be proud of your actions but dont try to sway young people into an action they could easily regret. Just because YOU didnt regret it doesnt mean anything.
The last story: if you can't make or defend your point without lying, you don't have a point. No one, especially in healthcare at any capacity, should be allowed to spread information that is known to be false, fraudulent, or purposefully skewed to hide the truth.
@@Chimpy1 Let’s go!! I’m never gonna sign a contract without reading it to the deepest extent. Call it nitpicking but if there’s any loopholes for something like spelling bees.. let’s just say I’ll be signing up.
Blake lively is genuinely psychotic for the way she’s promoting this movie. There are survivors and young women that have gone to theaters to see the movie without know it was even about domestic violence.
But how? I still don’t understand how you can sue from one country against people from another country. Especially the US, free speech is highly protected.
@@NeonJ1 free speech as in protection from beong persecuted by the government for what you say. Doesn't meam there can't be consequences from other people when you do things like slander
RE: It Ends With Us The problem isn't JUST the press surrounding the film. The book it comes from was already problematic. Hoover was selling a cutesy colouring book with quotes from the source material. It's ALL BAD. The author romanticizes abuse, why wouldn't everything else made from her work?
I've heard nothing but bad things about CoHo, hell my girlfriend LOVES romantic books but I always tell her to stay away from CoHo BECAUSE of the fucking romanticizing abuse. Why people buy that crap is beyond me.
When I was little, I went to Disneyworld with my family. One of my family members has serious dietary restrictions, so they asked the waiter about having their food prepared a certain way. He stopped them dead in their tracks and left to get the head chef of the restaurant. My family member shared their dietary restrictions with HIM, and everyone's food was prepared exactly as needed. There were no issues. The restaurant Piccolo and his family went to should have done this for him and his wife, but I guess the waiter hadn't been working there long enough to know any better. Take care of YOURSELVES people! You got dietary restrictions? Don't talk to the wait staff, talk to the Head Chef.
The Disney story is the equivalent to Red Solo cup saying "you went to a party in 1993, therefore we are not responsible for you falling into our state-of-the-art Ball Crusher 5000"
MrBeast is running a "business" but can’t even write something formally, I can’t even believe that this is something he gives to employees, I am surprised he still has employees.
@Jonathan_Collins Are you kidding? You know how many managers across many companies I have had that talk about A, B and C level employees? A lot! It's not new or in anyway unique to Mr. Beasts team. That particular accusation is neither illegal nor uncommon. It's a nothing burger from someone desperate for more stuff to talk about and drive more traffic to their own content for their gain.
@BAM5636 there is a section of a document that is titled "NO does not always mean no" you wanna defend a shitty frat millionaire? go right ahead and waste your breath on a guy that won't give you $1000 for being a subscriber
My opinion on It Ends With Us: Colleen Hoover is basically just a smut writer and It Ends With Us is pretty much 50 shades of grey marketing itself as "serious" literature about DV. The problem is, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either market the movie as a serious film about DV OR a fun smutty dark romance. If do both at the same time, people are going to side-eye you.
From what I know about Justin Baldoni, he has a long history of being a relatively green flag feminist man. I genuinely don’t believe he’s the problem here, he’s just the one outnumbered.
@@tboyk_859 idk I’ve seen enough videos of Blake being a c word all over the place. She’s also so unserious about the very serious topic her movie covers. I think in general he just took this more seriously.
@@lexdsly but if you look at how she’s approached most of her movies, I’d argue that she’s been this same exact way. The point is people are trying to force her to act a certain way, instead of just being herself she didn’t say it do anything inappropriate and we know now that she wasn’t supposed to be the only one responsible for doing these run interviews. She was supposed to have her Co start there and he didn’t show up to most of them meaning she had to carry the entire interview. Your personal opinion on her being a c bag is kind of irrelevant (especially if you’ve never actually met her) when talking about if she objectively did anything wrong or if she’s objectively a bad person.
@@tboyk_859 I mean my opinion might be irrelevant but ultimately neither of us know her, know him, know the situation. But frankly I feel like her not talking about DV on the press tour but constantly talking about how she’s wearing florals is a bit out of touch🤷🏻♀️ you’re entitled to your opinion as am I
@@lexdsly no it isn’t. That’s just your assumption because you’ve already come to a preconceived notion about her as an individual despite the fact that you don’t know her for all. Which is exactly my point all facts that we have now don’t suggest that she’s doing anything the nefarious.
@@burnsboy101😅nice reply so since you have nothing of substance to add ill go ahead. Theres nothing wrong with only wanting the best employees Jimmy has always said hes obsessive about it and want to surround him self with other that are as well. As well as the comment about letting the talent do what they want yea thats pretty common lol most comedians in movies they will do a few shots readying the script and then they normally give them a few shots to rift and take the best and guess what alot of the time the improvised stuff im personally still waiting for some bomb to drop cause the most ive seen is all come from chris just acting inappropriately around kids the sa allegations are a bit of a joke. They were both adults it was all consenting but because they felt a different way about how things ended they then decided they were abused because of a power dynamic
@@burnsboy101 Most companies do that shit and now suddenly its supposed to be shocking because its Mr Beast. If you dont like how a company is run then just don't work there. Its not that complicated, people bitch and whine about how they were treated while working somewhere and then stayed there for 10 years. I find it hard to believe that were just 0 other options so it couldn't have been that bad that you didn't just quit. And if you keep working somewhere because of "pressure to preform" then you need to learn how to value yourself, if people wouldn't keep up with this shit like morons then those companies wouldn't exist.
Aside from the fact that Disney did this, I have allergies as well and I can't tell you how often restaurants don't listen to me. I don't want to die, please don't take my request to not die as being picky or stuck-up, or like I'm trying to make your job harder. I, don't, want, to DIE! I think either the server or the cook should be examined for poisoning and negligence of customer health.
Dude. You should ALWAYS have your allergy medication on you if you're that allergic. No server nor cook is equipped to handle that high-risk of a customer. I'm not saying that it's in any way her fault, sounds like gross negligence, but the reality is the server is hired because of their affability and organisational skills. The cook is hired for their efficiency and capability to work under pressure. Nowhere are ordinary restaurants equipped to deal with extremely allergic people (hell, even Kraft aren't capable of making their ready to eat products allergen-free).
@@kaingatesmedication for anaphylaxis, aka epi, is short acting. It doesn't reverse, prevent, or cure the reaction, it's only meant to keep your airway open long enough to hopefully get you to the hospital. You still need to inform the restaurant of your allergy and hope they don't f**k it up and kill you accidentally.
@@kaingateswell to devil’s advocate a bit. Going by another comment in the section for context. Disney restaurants have one kitchen for multiple restaurants. This practice creates much greater risks and is implying that the kitchen does not have allergens present in the kitchen that are not on the menu, when in fact there are likely many present in the kitchen that the foods prepared in. Besides if any restaurant doesn’t want to be held responsible it is as easy as saying that they can’t promise that the food is allergen free.
Actually did a little cheer when I heard that poor woman is suing Elon Musk and JK Rowling for cyberbullying. I hope she gives them the same beating she gives her opponents...legally speaking, of course. Elon Musk was born a lost cause, but I still have foolish hope that Rowling will see the error of her ways. When she's face to face with someone she's hurt, maybe it'll respark that empathy I know she had, and is what made her write such good characters.
Jk isn't quite as bad as people say, but she has only been getting worse as people overreach to paint her as the biggest bigot ever. Not to say she hasn't said some very stupid things, she absolutely has.
Ikr, it's sad that such a great author has such a horrible side to her. Like let people live their lives. She could have retired in peace as a billionaire and gone down as one of earth's fav authors but no
If you think Rowling will see the error of her ways, you are far too optimistic, she has been a trash human especially against trans people for over a decade now. She has been dragged through the mud over these issues and many people have criticised her over it and she still is transphobic and just as hateful. She isn't going to change
@@soulslikefan6760And those stupid things have hurt people tremendously. Stop stanning for some celebrity like you know shit about them. You don't and never will know what she's truly thinking only the fact she's outright supported transphobes and used her platform to spread her disgusting nonsense.
We'll find out what Judge is bought by Disney if they allow the company to win the case for the reason related to Disney+ terms. The insanity to follow if they do is beyond reason. That judge would indirectly be saying that a contract (e.g. terms of service) can literally be used to justify the killing of someone. Both "intentionally" and unintentionally, as intent is not necessary to look at. It's illegal to kill someone, but it's NOT illegal to avoid consequences doing so as long as said person accepted some arbitrary terms of service agreement to something completely unrelated. "Someone died partaking something in your establishment. Oh they agreed to a terms of service point that states they can't sue you because they bought a keychain at a Walmart 20 years ago that was made by your company? Checks out that they can't hold you liable then."
@@samhainnc9416 Disney themselves pointed out the Disney+ connection that's why. Literally, they pointed it out lol. Both Disney+ and the service used for the tickets purchased point to the same arbitration clause, since it's all encompassing. Because it's the same clause, it ultimately doesn't matter what was used as Disney's defense, as they're all literally the same. I'd imagine purchasing something from the Disney store online points to the same clause. Assuming that's the case, signing up to buy a Winnie the Pooh doll for a kid will (in this hypothetical) apparently waive the ability to take Disney to court if the same kid dies at one of their parks, even if the corporation is at fault. That's just absurd lol. I get arbitration is to prevent absurd lawsuits, but being at fault for wrongful death is very different from being at fault for getting the color wrong on a toy.
@@samhainnc9416 Disney Springs isn't inside the parks though, so that holds just as much water as saying the Disney+ subscription waives their right to a jury trial.
ITS NOT THEIR FUCKING ESTABLISMENT Raglan Road Irish Pub is not and never has been a disney establisment its owned and operated by irishmen paul nolan and john cooke
My fiancée did take the first dose and changed her mind afterwards. The baby did survive and is doing alright now. We went for a scan before she took the drug and she was 8 weeks along. So far we have not seen any side effects and any tests show she’s healthy. She’s our bundle of joy. I’m not saying it is always reversible but in my case she didn’t take the second pill and we pulled through alright.
As a woman who was in an abusive relationship and has read the book in question, I can tell you that the book is a romanticized version of such a relationship. The author wrote it from the view of a child whose parents were in such a relationship and it is clear that she romanticized her father and saw the good in him. I find the book naive and offensive. I cannot tell you if the movie is the same, but I can tell you that the initial marketing implied the abuse and seemed to have that in the forefront, but later the marketing turned and seems to focus on the romance of the central couple. That I find offensive. This isn't supposed to be a story if love that faded it's supposed to be about an abusive relationship and the true implications of such, otherwise, what is the point?
To put it into perspective, "is there a possibility this works? I will say until I'm blue in the face, 'Yes, there is a possibility it works,' 'is there any evidence that it works? None.'" is the same thing physicists say about time travel.
It is *ABSOLUTELY* ludicrous for Disney to try and block that lawsuit like this. Imagine if one of your family members died at Nintendo World and you try to sue Nintendo for it, only for them to basically say "Sorry, you bought Nintendo Online once in 2018 and thus agreed to never sue us for anything, ever." This is downright near dystopian levels of corrupt corporation.
Exactly. Whoever came up with the idea in the first place and whoever got it approved, should be held personally accountable as well. The house of the mouse seems to be a real pest.
Name and shame those behind that statement. They're too disconnected.
So, Disney says "You agreed to have all disputes go through arbitration.
In Disney's book, that strongly suggests that "I used a Disney product and it KILLED my wife." is something within the realm of acceptable possibilities when engaging in consumption of Disney products.
This is crazy
Watch theres boutta be so many people down in these comments defending them
Person: can’t wait to watch this Loki show
Disney: Thanks for your purchase, you are now able to be killed by Disney
Man but Loki is such a good show.. 😢
Now it's not only a moral issue, but a health issue, as to why everyone should pirate Disney stuff they want to see.
Wasn't that the literal plot of several episodes of BoJack Horseman?
feels like some dystopian future shit right there.
@@GlitterC8kpirate it. Everything can be pirated in this day and age
Imagine slipping and falling in a Whole Foods and being told you can't sue them because you have an Amazon Prime account. Utterly insane. The precedent this would set if Disney even slightly wins is unfathomable.
The thing is also is he signed up for it. Not her, so she never accepted the terms.
And that's why they're trying to do it. The temporary harm the media exposure gives them is worth the potential for getting a favorable precedent.
@@pleasedontwatchthese9593 Legally she did by entering the park/ using the ticket.
The thing is they will probably win on the arbitration part because it was agreed upon when buying the tickets. now will they get away scot free no they will likely have to pay him a good amount of money in the pain and suffering category but sadly the allergy part will fall into the the " coffee is hot" column in the well known fact the no dish is ever allergy free from a commercial kitchen unless you've cleaned down your kitchen and sanitized EVERYTHING between each and every dish which no kitchen can or will do.
He's the person suing them, get her parent to do it and its g2g@pleasedontwatchthese9593
Law student here. Arbitration is such a huge cancer in consumer and employment contexts. It’s never truly neutral, because the more powerful party is a repeat player with advantages like prior experience with an arbitrator, getting to pick the arbitrator, and, of course, way more money for lawyers in the arbitration. People often don’t know what arbitration even is when they sign these agreements, let alone have a strong comprehension of how agreeing to arbitrate would affect them.
Is crazy how all these stories can be summarized as "powerful rich people think they can get away with anything."
It's pretty much every major negative story honestly
The American dream, waking nightmare
Idk about y'all but I'm gettin' hungry af.
Powerful rich people CAN get away with anything. They don't "think" this. They already know.
Holy shit, literally, it’s all I see now a days. And all these people are so god damn dumb and are flabbergasted when something happens to them and find out that company or what ever they support will do what ever takes to fuck then over and doesn’t give a shit about them, other then getting there money.
I’ve mentioned this quite a few times now in previous comments but I’ve worked as a chef for nearly 10 years now. You absolutely can not take the risk with allergens. We are responsible for our food and clearly the proper precautions weren’t taken. The idea that you can’t sue a company that killed your wife, one of the largest companies on earth, is so mind numbingly idiotic I don’t even have words for it. The chefs and Disney itself should be held responsible. Even if it was a horrific mistake, that needs to be known. Fuck Disney
The strange thing to me is that the restaurant isn't being sued?
Technically Disney is just the landlord and Raglan Road rents space at their shopping district.
It's absolutely insane their lawyers are choosing this argument vs the simple one that they are a landlord and not owners or operators of the restaurant. Mind-blowing stuff.
@@janelliz I don’t know too much about the specifics and how the law works in America but from what I can see they’re still considered Disney employees hence why Disney is being sued. I could be wrong on that tho. I imagine they’re going for this argument to try and set an extremely fucked up legal precedent and I imagine if it does actually go before a jury they’ll use the “we’re just the landlords” argument. However I think because the restaurant is in a Disney park and because of the PR damage that their current argument has caused, they won’t win that. And I suspect their lawyers know that. I personally think no matter how you cut it, this whole situation is an absolute nightmare for Disney. But, you don’t get to be a multi-billion dollar company by being ethical. This is far from the most fucked up thing Disney has done
My friend’s daughter has those same allergies and this is absolutely terrifying. It’s no joke. We can’t touch her if we’ve touched dairy unless we wash our hands thoroughly with soap and water first. The fact that they asked multiple times and informed them she was allergic and it wasn’t just a preference is grossly negligent.
@@shaesmith2831they’ll settle out of court if this tactic doesn’t work (and I sure as hell hope it doesn’t!). We likely won’t hear of the case again if this gets struck down. I hope the husband doesn’t settle and takes them all the way to a jury, but at the same time, legal cases are exhausting so I hope if he settles he gets millions and millions because nothing will bring his wife back. 😔
@@shaesmith2831They aren't Disney employees but 3rd party partners. They are owned by Paul Nolan and John Cooke and operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida. Their employees aren't employeed or hired by Disney. Now Disney does have stricter than usual lease terms giving them a higher level of control over their tenants but ultimately the businesses are in charge of hiring and training their staff. Attempting to use this clause to arbitrate the case is ridiculous but I don't think they should be the focus of the suit.
Disney sued my small-town high school because our mascot kind of looked like one of their characters. They won, and we lost our art program. Horrible company and I feel awful for the husband. Disney's response to that lawsuit is so absurd.
woah that is a wild true story
They sued a daycare over a mural. Universal said F U and went and painted them a new one with thier charters. For that alone, Universal won a spot in my heart.
My partner was in a terrifyingly similar situation at Disney with a waiter who didn’t BELIEVE in food allergies. My partner and his family explained to the waiter about his allergies, he said it’d be fine but didn’t write anything down. Food came out and they asked again. He assured them it was fine, even though they could SEE one of his allergens on his plate. Afterwards, they went to the manager and explained, “that guy is going to kill somebody.”
A couple years later, they went to a different Disney restaurant and saw the same waiter working the floor. Immediately walked out.
There is no reason for this to have happened and I cannot image the pain and absolute rage the poor family is feeling right now.
"I'm allergic to peanuts"
Waiter: "Nuh uh"🥜💀
Coming across one of those “I don’t believe in allergies” waiters is my worst nightmare. Thankfully my allergy isn’t fatal (technically an intolerance) but the symptoms will last for hours and are extremely debilitating. The fear of food being contaminated with an allergen is something everyone with a food allergy understands, and it’s why many of us rarely eat out. It’s not something to play around with. Especially when nut allergies are known to be extremely life threatening.
That’s scary to see a dangerous employee appear at a different location. With all the ways to track a person’s digital identity, it’s awful to read about stories like yours where people aren’t added to a list to not hire in service industries, etc.
might be helpful to see if it's the same waiter, and pass the info on.
@@dragonlord1225
Guy: What... what the fuck do you mean nuh uh?! I am allergic to th-
Waiter: NUH UUUUH
Disney's response to that poor woman's death is utterly appalling. Family entertainment company? I think not.
I can't understand how they screwed up this bad when they were constantly reminded about the allergy.
Oh yeah, sue them.
Disgusting- sure... appalling suggests an element of surprise- since you are apparently ignorant of how terrible Disney is, so you find it appalling- the vast majority of people who have worked a real job or had the misfortune of working for Disney are not appalled, just tired.
Let's face it, if the story goes viral, they've just killed Disney +
@@alienboy1322probably employees who did it on purpose when asked repeatedly. I know it sounds crass, but I've seen pretty cruddy underpaid waiters who would mistake that kind of repeating herself for snobbyness and condescension and do a sheet thing, not understanding the consequences7
@@danielbyrne5402
I bet that's how it went down.
that's so fucking insane that Disney is like "oh yeah you can't sue us cause u have Disney+" LIKE WHAT?? THAT'S INSANE
It's fucking wild likewtaf
That would never hold in court.
Reminds me of the airline blaming kids for being filmed in the bathroom. Lawyers trying to win at all costs with no thought to PR or the fact they are probably going to piss off the judge/jury
@@Remedy462 Ik it wouldn't but it's still fucking stupid xD
I think they're just going for a longshot to create the precedent. The better defense is that they don't own the restaurant that served the guy's wife. It would be like a guy killing someone and then suing his landlord. I don't know how it hasn't been thrown out already.
Re: That tweet trying to throw Justin Baldoni under the bus, apparently Colleen specifically befriended him and wanted him to direct and star, even when he wasn't himself sure about being the lead in the movie. If Justin's to blame for a bad movie being made from a bad book, some of that blame should be thrown at Colleen herself.
Agreed
Well, I went and saw it with my wife and the theater was full.
@@christopherhuber2870it’s still his movie. How was it? I’m hesitant to go but I don’t really like seeing dv
Looking at the earlier drafts to the film, it becomes clear that Justin had a very different idea for the film. It appeared to be much more grounded and centred around the issues of DV. It is possible the divide has come from the intervention from Blake pushing the more aesthetic look we now have for the film
@@elliesmith7410 I'm waiting for more information, but rn that's the vibe I'm getting. It seems like from conception the book has had controversy since Colleen markets her books like romance novels, when It Ends With Us is more about DV from what I understand (I confess I haven't read it and don't plan to.), she even got heat for attempting to release a coloring book based on the book (about DV). From what I've seen all of Baldoni's press has been about wanting to do such a serious topic justice, meanwhile Blake has been about girl movie summer and wearing florals and not mentioning DV at all (which I mean, fair-ish? DV probably doesn't sell movies, but then why make and/or star in a movie about that book if you don't want to be in movies about serious topics?). Blake has only just now levied some accusations at Justin, and so far they still make him seem like a pretty stand up guy imo. I think the instinct to assume the guy is at fault is a prejudiced but not completely unfair one given celebrity men's general track record, but in this case unless some bombshell news comes out it seems like they're throwing Justin under the bus here when he didn't do anything that should require all the cast ghosting him.
Citizen of India and specifically West Bengal (the state where the r*pe & murder happened) and I'm so grateful this is getting some international coverage. Doctors have been asking for protection for decades now. Maybe international shaming will move the needle. But I also want to add that in this specific case, the violence was very personal and utterly gruesome. There are details coming out now that points to gng r*p and violent beating of her body post death. It also looks like an active cover up is going on which is stoking the protests. I really hope the murdered doctor gets justice, but most of all I hope we get strong laws to protect doctors now.
I want to say that it will change; but corrupt police, corrupt doctors, corrupt lawyers; corrupt judges; corrupt ministers - who is going to do anything? The average Indian citizen (being uneducated, culturally backwards and care more about their family status) will most likely say it’s the doctor’s fault; so no help there! This is the second internationally reported ‘gang r!!p’ and since then, what has changed? Nothing! Until the civil systems are repaired there will be no justice. I am scared for India and its ppl.
we are trying our very best to get rid of West benagl's tyrant mamta banerjee who was trying to cover up this issue
Hi there, I'm very curious on the matter. I wonder if there's security in hospitals in india. because people are much less likely to make a report if there isn't someone in the immediate area to report to or ask for help in the moment. And it's preventative too, maybe it wouldn't happen in the first place if there was always someone on hand to hold people accountable. By no means does having security or not justify people being harmful, i'm just asking the question.
@@vivalanina There are but it's ineffective and in this case the perpetrators weren't outsiders breaking in, it was people who already had access to the hospital.
@@vivalanina hospitals do have cctv in hospitals here. But this incident has political strings attached to it. Mere days after the rpe, the hospital tore down the walls of the room where it happened under the guise of "renovation". The police claimed it a suicide, and the Minister of the area is victim blaming. The local govt keeps trying to cover it up for some reason...
Allowing Disney to move to arbitration over a subscription service agreement would set an extremely dangerous legal precedent.
You look like Wendigoon
@@gohabs8918 lol 🤷🏽
I don't believe it would pass any court, but if it does I hope they appeal cause that judge would have to be corrupt as fuck.
@speedy01247 yeah think this shouldn't hold up in court. Some rights you just can't sign away and if there's gross negligence no amount of legal waivers will save them. Like legal waivers are for reasonable foreseeable risks, its not a get out of jail free card or something....
It obviously wouldn't work anyway.
The worst part about the Disney thing is that it doesn't matter if you at any point unsubscribe for whatever reason, they're gonna be like "oh but you were subscribed, you did accept that clause all those years ago, can't get out now"
Pure demon contract shit
It's crazy they think nda's mean you can now commit crimes, like what? Contracts are null when you commit physical crimes. I can't even
I'm no lawyer but that seems like a breach of contract to me. If you unsubscribed you are no longer obligated to follow the conditions of the contract. I don't think contracts are allowed to be held in perpetuity.
It’s like they’re roleplaying as Devils from DnD……..
Only in America would a company even dare to make the ridiculous argument that signing up for a free trial of their service means you can’t sue them for wrongful death from a different service.
Even if u had signed it, in EU, it would of been thrown out the window as a nonsical claim.
@@WALLENTIN98it will in all likelihood be thrown out in any us state aswell
To begin with courts are already known to often void TOS agreements
@@thatdamncrow9197 they knew it probably would I would bet, but they simply have to try cuz if it works its fantastic for them.
PLENTY of European corporations (ex. Volkswagen) has done questionable things. Seems like you're just looking for excuses to complain about America.
not only is it wrongful death of a different service... his wife isn't the one that signed the agreement in the first place and hes suing on her behalf iirc
Maybe a hot take but men should absolutely be involved in conversations about DV, and they should be allowed to tastefully and consciously make movies discussing the topic. Men too are not only victims of DV, but they are also related to or have relationships with women who have in some way experienced abuse. Our conversations about relational abuse mean nothing if men are not in the room.
And maybe the director didn’t agree with the PR, which is why he’s not getting involved with it… I feel like people are too quick to assumptions based on preset narratives.
I agree. There is no evidence to suggest that he was a bad person. I think some people just make up stories in their head and believe it. It’s so much easier on the internet. It wouldn’t hurt people to stop and think about what they’re saying, and how it could affect others.
DV relationships often go both ways, men get abused too. I understand that current culture makes a lot of men somewhat immature and ignorant on how bad DV is (even when they are experiencing it) but how do we expect people to understand things better if we lock them out of the conversations.
I know most men do not like DV and would genuinely help anyone in that kind of situation but when they are only allowed superficial knowledge on it because their voices are shut down in these areas it only makes the men who want to help not notice when someone needs help and then men who've been a DV victim feel like their story is not only worth less but it doesn't matter either
you don't have to have your voice heard in order to listen to the voices of others. that being said, I would agree some male voices speaking about DV against men, is something we should listen to.
#amberheard
@@GarrettK24I would flip it and say the reason why he’s distancing himself is because of Blake. There are a number of interviews from the press junket for the film where Blake just glossed over anything relating to the serious undertone for the film. From what I’ve seen of Blake (could not care any less for any of her films) she’s not a nice person and very self centred making everything about her
The lil '+' in Disney+ isn't a plus, it's a tiny gravestone
😬
@@KawaiiNancyprofile checks out 🤣
Okay, that's a good meme.
Imagine Disney being legally able to negligently kill you because you bought a ticket for Deadpool and Wolverine 💀
disney didn't kill anyone, the resteraunt isn't owned or operated by disney
@@houseofactionThen why are their contractual stipulations apart of the case?
I wonder if this is a case where Disney is the parent company? Disney has their hands in more than just movies and theme parks, so restraint chains could be one of them. I also have to wonder if it's on the park (not sure,haven't been to Disney World) if they take most of the liability
A likely future we are emerging into in this cursed timeline.
Disney laying down the first argument to break up the company on behalf of those who deem it a monopoly
That would be hysterical and hilarious!
Im from India. Women's safety is questionable here.Almost all women I've met here, including myself have faced harrasment and sexual abuse, some face it on a daily basis. What happened to the female doctor is horrific, the hospital administration & police are trying to hide evidence. It's frustrating this political hypocrisy, 50% voter's are women, yet the clutch hold of patriarchy is so strong at grassroot levels. I hope the doc receives justice ASAP
Another Feminazi blaming patriarchy for some monsters who can also be "women".
get rid of mamta banerjee and bengal will be saved
Women’s safety is TERRIBLE there.
When I heard about the news I teared up a little. It's so unfair! She was there to help and what did she get in return??? And to think the authorities are hiding evidence like wtf??? I hope her death and suffering were not in vain. As a victim myself I wish you safety and a better life.
@@PhimbleG-d People wont talk about it because you'll just be labeled a racist in this brave new progressive world- but that doesn't bother me. There is a massive problem with the way Indian men are raised and the culture towards women, they are seen as objects. Ive seen Indian boys as young as 5-6 pin a female classmate against the wall and try to start tearing clothes off.. very strange and sickening behavior. Ive never seen it so young with any other group of people. I live and work in a very diverse area, only about 40 of my 200 students are white. They all come from different backgrounds, some immigrant parents some native, some ghetto some rich- Ive seen it all. You start to notice certain patterns and behaviors.
With It Ends With Us, the main problem is the book itself and Colleen Hoover. Honestly just Colleen in general, almost all of her books romanticize toxic relationships but she advertises them as romcoms. I read it a few years ago and was shocked because I had no idea it dealt with such a serious subject. I really worry that people who are survivors or victims of dv might go into the movie thinking it’s a fun lighthearted movie and could end up being triggered and re-traumatized because of this carelessness. Idk what happened between Justin and the rest of the cast but at least he is accurately promoting the movie for what it is.
So like I just recently read the book and yeah it can be shallow here and there, but is it really romanticising it if they don’t actually end up together ? Not to mention being “in love” with said “abuser” plays a big role in why its difficult to part ways with such people? Imo but idk much about colleen
I'm gonna preface this by saying I'm not supporting this weird movie at all, but that the culture of trigger warnings is actually more harmful than good. It's meant to protect people, but doesn't help in any way.
@@DoobieKeebler I know that it helps me to prepare myself mentally before I read something that may bring up to old feelings. I don't know about other people though.
@@DoobieKeebler idk man when I didn’t get a trigger warning for a book I ended up not sleeping properly for 3 months and was super skittish. Properly used they can help especially for people who don’t use trigger as a buzzword
@@DoobieKeeblerit helps a lot of people, what are you talking about? It certainly hurts no one so why not use them?
The Disney restaurant was insane. I worked in Florida restaurants for years and we would NEVER EVER give allergen assurances. We could say "here are the ingredients" and sometimes "we can make your salad without tomatoes" but unless you've cleaned down your kitchen and sanitized EVERYTHING there is no way to guarantee no allergen contamination whatsoever. Even if *your* recipe doesn't include peanuts or milk, do you know for sure that every one of your ingredients doesn't and never came in contact before they reached you? This thing sounds like not only negligence, but gross negligence to make so many assurances. If I knew not to do that as a drive-thru robo person, I can't imagine how a fancy tourist restaurant wouldn't. They're trying to claim arbitration by bullshit because they KNOW they will lose the suit.
Allergies suck, but I think it's ultimately on yourself . Don't go out to eat if it could be that deadly . Imagine Mr.Glass suing everyone that bumps into him.
@@badgerbun bullshit take, if you ask and they assure you it's safe and they took the neccessary precautions. They lied to her face and killed her! All they had to do is tell the truth and she wouldn't have eaten there.
@@badgerbunBut its not mr. glass, because mr. glass is an imaginary person and to compare a situation in which a multibillion dollar company negligently killed an actual human person to a movie person in order to shift blame on the woman who was KILLED is kinda monstrous, actually.
@@DroseraNara the same take as "well ackhtually it was in the 84 page waiver and you signed it so I'm not liable!" some people actually live in their own little world Lol
its not a disney restaurant Raglan road is not owned or operated by disney
I laughed when Phil quoted the Dr where she said:"when a woman changes her mind, she has the right to review her options" because why all of a sudden do women's choices matter when it comes to reversing abortions but not when wanting abortions
💯. It's hypocritical. It's only if it fits their agenda. Remember when the far right started chanting "my body, my choice" on wearing a 10 cent mask? But hate it when it actually involves a woman's choice to her own body?
Yes!!! This!
Because you kill a healthy baby when you abort a fetus.
Probably because of the implications
No matter how much you convince yourself about a fetus not being alive and not having right, the mere thought of unborning something will never stop being icky
That a 150 BILLION DOLLAR company is fighting tooth and nails on a super shaky grounds to get a $50k lawsuit where THEY CAUSED A DEATH OF A PERSON dismissed is just mind boggling. That's next level of penny pinching
Hardly surprises me, sadly. They’ve turned into Scrooge. And I’ll gladly say “Scrooge McFuck Disney”
My exact thoughts, this is nothing for Disney, pocket change. How incredibly greedy and selfish. I hope they lose this and have pay the poor family even more
Lmao. You naive little turds. You will all forget this story as soon as Phily D stops talking about it.
And it is disgusting they would be paying way more in legal fees
Almost like the are itching for a fight.
Dude wtf is that Disney story? "You signed up for a free 1 month trial for Disney+ in 2019 so when we end up messing up and that leads to your WIFE, your one and only beautiful wife, dying, as a DIRECT result of our gross negligence, you can't sue us" Wtf? Yea. No. This genuinely is a get away from Disney+ and cancel your subscriptions moment. That is disgusting and horrifying. Imagine that happens to you. P*racy looks more and more moral as the days go by.
I mean they tried to nab him with a 2019 free trial, not even an ongoing subscription. Its too late even if you decided you didn't like it 20 minutes later, too bad the mouse owns your soul.
There's no way the court is going to accept that argument. It's completely ridiculous.
They agreed to it.
Not even just gradually getting more moral by the day, this is straight up the breaking point. Pirate everything on disney plus.
Who tf uses disney + in 2024?
I canceled it 2 months after the free trial ended.
The Disney story is like on South Park when they agreed to be in a human centipede because they agreed to the terms of service without reading it. We're seeing satire become more and more real every day.
Butters: Deny... click.
Such insanity. Why should I ever engage in Disney anything.
Dude it’s crazy I was just calling my friend stopped the video and said this same reference ridiculous that episode is even remotely true.
The woke agenda realized
The thing that really bothers me about the Imane Khelif story is how both sides are conflating intersex with trans. The IOC is literally saying, either she is trans, or not, and that there's no possibility she is intersex (and hence could be disqualified without any wrongdoing).
Just goes to show you, if you're part of a small enough group of people, who don't fit into anyone's narrative, you can be completely erased.
Olympic athlete, wins gold, is globally famous.....
"ThEy'Re eRaSiNg meEEee!!!"
Khelif isn't even intersex!! She's not trans, she doesn't have a chromosomal disorder or high testosterone. It's ALL made up. She's just a normal, tall, strong girl who learned to box because people bullied her for being tall and strong. Most of the people in her community told he shole couldn't box because she was a girl. Now she's being told she can't box because she's a man, and that's unfair to other girls.
The people pretending to care about protecting and supporting women, are stepping all over the women who need the support.
@@Icarus07c You are as literate as you are good looking.
The fact she is sueing over mean words is directly contradictory to our constitution and if America doesn't block the lawsuit we're fucked
@@TeknicalliDyfficultGames they weren't "mean words", tose people spread misinfomation about an athlete being potentially transgender.
I worked in a Disney kitchen for a while in 2018. They always walked this line where they'd say their food was allergen free, but they couldn't guarantee it hadn't been contaminated. The kitchen I worked out of had three restaurants running out of the same kitchen that served wildly different menus, so there was always a chance there could be at least trace amounts of allergens in the food. For example: the ice cream station that served peanuts was right next to the steamwell. The steamwell stations didn't have peanuts technically, but there were peanuts less than ten feet away from the production area. I'm genuinely surprised the employees were so adamant that the food was clear.
"surprised the employees were so adamant that the food was clear." SO says the family who lost a loved one. Unfortunately they are an unreliable narrator and we really can't say for sure what they said to the family or the family to them as both sides have their own take and it doesn't match.
@@samhainnc9416I haven’t looked into the story more, but in Phil’s coverage it never stated whether or not the allergen was actually found in the food she was served. Just that she had a reaction after eating, passed, and had the allergen in her system. Do you know if the food was tested and found to have the allergen in it?
@@MommyOfMutantsat the start of the segment, Phil says that they chose that restaurant because she had a deadly allergy to dairy and nuts, and the article on screen at 7:57 says that she had "very high" levels of nut and dairy allergens in her system when she died
@@bekichan91I know that and mentioned it in my comment. I was just wondering if they ever tested her actual food or found where/how the allergens got into her food. What she ordered doesn’t seem to have nuts in it ordinarily, so for her to have “high levels” in her system seems weird. Trace amounts from cross-contamination is one thing, but it seems like there was just full-on dairy and nuts in her food. Just wondering if they found out if it was in the food (ie. they never attempted to make it allergen-free), if it was from cross-contamination (ie. an accident happened in the kitchen somehow), or some other way entirely. She was also in another location/store when she had the reaction, could she have come into contact with something there? I’m just wondering if they knew exactly how she came into contact with the allergens, or how they had gotten into the food 🤷🏼♀️
@@MommyOfMutants I have the same allergy, so let me clear this up. She absolutely ate food that contained her allergens at that restaurant. The timing checks out, and all the epipens in the world will (most likely) not save you if you ingest enough of the allergen to override the epipens/antihistamines. Cross-contamination? Chances of survival are good-ish, but it's still enough to kill if ingested. Even a spoonful of an allergen can be deadly. Depending on the dish she was served, she might not have been able to smell or taste the nuts or dairy. The dish might have been cooked in nut oils, which would account for the high (but difficult to notice) nut content in the dish. And dairy is especially hard to detect through taste and smell when mixed with something else.
The disney lawsuit is exactly like that South Park episode about Kyle and Apple
If you know, you know
100% what I thought of first
Disney+ comes pre installed in the new Human Cent-I-pads this year.
Why won't they read!? Lol
I can’t ever eat cuttlefish ever again.
@@PresidentJackBauercause those documents are purposely built to be difficult to read, they were written by lawyers meant to be read by lawyers, a normal person might as well try to read a physics textbook and they'd understand around as much.
Me: *signs up for disney+ free trial*
Dinsey: "so you have chosen death!"
Me: Subscribes to Disney +
Disney: SO YOU HAVE CHOSEN DEATH
Yet another reason to pirate things instead of signing up for things like Disney+
“If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing.”
Wise words
been going strong since Kazaa and napster
I got my eyepatch & have been going strong.
There have been a bunch of companies adding these arbitration clauses in the last year that pretty much say "if we do anything wrong, you waive your right to sue." How can this possibly be legal or in good faith to the consumer?
Because it hasn't been tested in any court and current law is often insufficient not keeping up though it's not like that's not been known. I'd heard there's been alot of this going on in the US. I note when I see 'updated TOS' in emails for whatever product I use there's either a separate US clause or a clause similar to 'X applies unless your country's laws don't allow for it' which they usually don't.
This cannot be a real written official document for a COMPANY! This is so embarrassing. Looks written by a 12 year old!
You haven't been reading the works of many 12-year-olds.
I honestly dont get why its such a big deal.
you arn't being fair, the boys wrote it so they are encouraged to be idiots 8===D
It's written like someone who got famous by grinding with his good ol boys and expects everyone else to give up their lives too while kissing their feet. Unfortunately it's more common then you'd think.
most of their employees are young adults or actual teens. of course it can
Disney is notorious for insane stuff like this. I can think of at least two times off the top of my head that they threatened legal action against grieving parents for wanting to put certain characters on their childrens headstones. The fact that this new act is baked into the fine print of Disney + contracts, even trials, is diabolical.
I'm from Kolkata and we had a huge turnout for "girls, reclaim the night" marches that we had at 12 am at many location points tonight. Just my location easily had thousands of people and other locations had even higher number of people all marching together. Everyone just walking together with signs or candles and shouting "we want justice". Tens of thousands of people walking and not a single person stepped out of line at any point. This was mainly for girls and groups of other marginalised orientations to "reclaim the night" as we've always been taught to avoid staying out or doing anything late at night, but people of all genders pretty much came out to march together in support. In my 30 years of life I have NEVER seen SUCH HUGE crowd of everyday people coming down to the streets for an issue. We're sick and tired. And we're also fucking done with this state govt clearly trying to hide the many more participants of this horrific crime one of whom is supposedly a powerful individual. They only arrested one individual and called it a night and also showed immense lack of transparency and competence at every step. A group of people also pretended to be a part of this protest march tonight and vandalised the R.G.Kar Hospital while all these marches were happening but it's laughable how they tried to frame the protesting crowd. There's high chances of things escalating further.
get rid of mamta banerjee as soon as possible
I am bengali but grew up in Delhi. My friends from kolkata tell me that the city never used to be like this. It was safe and women felt comfortable traveling in the city after hours. I always thought of WB as more progressive (compared to the North). This incident was heart breaking. Feels like we have no safe ground left in the country.
The Schindler's List parody promo was so creatively funny
I love how the defense against: "You're using unscientific methods" is just "We're free to do so" instead of "Here is all the evidence"
Exactly lol
And I love how the defense of an unfair intersex advantage is "her passport says female!1!" LOLOLOL
@@BusinessSkrub
So what you are saying is, you want women get beaten by men? LOL
@@BusinessSkrub she was born a woman and the Russians lied about her chromosome count cause she beat their player and they got salty. Deal with it 😂🖕🏽
@@BusinessSkrub she was born a woman. The Russians lied about her chromosome count cause she beat them and they got salty. Deal with it! 😂
I've always thought the whole "you'll regret having an abortion" line is funny, because if you DO regret it then get pregnant again as most abortions are from accidental pregnancy or r***, but the regret of having a child is irreversible, you can't put it back and adoption is a nightmare... What's the bigger regret "oh, I can try again" or "I've got to raise this child for 18 years"?
😂 most are inconvenience. PLEASE READ anything outside of leftist blogs and Phil defranco.
@@Dloopgroop @Dloopgroop Listen to data. Among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from r*** each year. Among 34 cases of pregnancy from r***, the majority occurred among adolescents and resulted from assault by a known, often related perpetrator. Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the r***. A total 32.4% of these did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion.
@@Dloopgroop They said most abortions are from /accidental pregnancy/ or rape. Accidental pregnancies are inconvenient. Do you think most abortions happen because people intentionally get pregnant and /then/ go "oh, this is too inconvenient!" or did you just not actually read their comment?
@THEMrFill We're in the RUclips comment section of a news video that talks about the rape of a woman, you don't need to censor the word rape. No amount of censoring will remove the horrible nature of the act; the word is just a word, and avoiding using it does victims no favors when they feel they can't talk plainly about it.
@jennygenova7656 🤣 no r4p3 is barely 5 percent of annual stats nice try at blending those 2 one being 90 percent the other being 5. All murders are from humans and democrat leftists.
All theft is from mammals and black people.
All beastiality is from people and Phillip defranco.
All hate crimes are from white people and homosapiens.
The Disney story is another example of us living in a cyberpunk dystopia. Corporats are completely unhinged, choom.
disney thinking they are now immune from lawsuits because of an arbitration clause, from any point in time, is incredibly funny.
"yeah we killed your wife but uhh you agreed to not sue us so we're gonna lowball you some cash and if you don't take it you get nothing" if they think that'll fly, its kinda dystopian.
Yeah shit like that is illegal usually. For example certain liability waivers don't matter if it's a failure of the staff or neglect that caused the death. If a roller coaster crashes and it's found that they didn't do maintenance in months and knew there was an issue it doesn't matter if there is a waiver against Sueing.
"if they think that'll fly, its kinda dystopian"
Sir the rich and powerful use NDA's to "pay" for their crimes all the time, it is dystopian. There is no fair government in the USA. In the words of former President Jimmy Carter: "The US is an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery."
What's crazy is this restaurant isn't Disney owned or operated, it's a 3rd party that leases the land from Disney and is in charge of hiring and training their own staff. This lawsuit gymnastics is insane and should be illegal but imo it should be the owners (Paul Nolan and John Cooke) and/or the operators Great Irish Pubs Florida being sued, not Disney.
I'd really like to see someone take Disney all the way. That senior accountant who worked 20 years at the parks sued for unfair dismissal when she brought dodgy park bookkeeping to Disney's attention which they ignored so she took it to the feds who said they'd investigate yet we heard nothing. She settled due to the stress of her husband taking his life ending that one. Now there's Carano's case and another entity going after them for DEI discrimination so I hope at least one gets to the courts or we'll never find out what they get up to. The 'you agree to arbitration' clauses in the US are currently being snuck in everywhere & need legal testing.
As a healthcare worker i hate that the story about the doctor being killed on the job doesnt surprise me considering how american patients have treated me as just a lab assistant. Ive been kicked, hit, spat on, patients try to bite me, stick me with my needles, so much and thats with decent security i cannot imagine how horrific working in a hospital without strong security would be.
What on earth? Haven't reached that story yet. I'm going to assume your patients intellectually disabled? If not, I cannot fathom what sane individual would stick needles into the person there to help them. Sorry for what you go through, hopefully you'll have better patients.
Assault is EXTREMELY common in any major hospital. You know those Ken's and Karen's that make life a nightmare for everyone else? They get sick, too. The crazy drug users that go into withdrawals and get violent, the anti vaxxers that have political rage against hospital workers. Or just people with anger issues that have never learned to deal with them, and know they won't face consequences because they're sick, so the public and legal system always side with them. There are a lot of violent people in the world.In fact, just in the US alone, 2 nurses are assaulted EVERY HOUR. Violence in healthcare is hardly exclusive to India
17:41 the DOD saying that supporting Israel is baffling to me. Why do we keep supporting a country that constantly spits in our face when we make demands to them? We have millions of homeless vets in this country and our infrastructure is deteriorating but yet we continue funneling money to a country that is actively conducting a genocide.
Palestine is no better. They're both countries run by a bunch of war criminals committing genocides daily. Your leftie news orgs haven't let you know about how bad Palestine is too, because it doesn't want you to stop screaming and crying against the Israelis. The antisemitism y'all support is WILD
USI
Follow the money. Look at who donates to who. Then it makes a lot more sense
Because
1. Israel is central to weapons R&D
2. Israel is our ally and a central foothold in the middle east
3. There isn't any g-cide. Helping the Israeli people defend their home against terrorism and the Iranian regime is a noble cause and we should be supporting that.
@@ar71498 time for your delulu pills mate, you missed your dose for the day
For the Blake Lively controversy, supposedly you left out that Baldoni’s cut of the movie did better with test audiences but apparently Blake and Ryan strong armed the studio into using her cut instead, and it seems like Blake is using her connections to become the lead producer for the movie.
I’m honestly leaning towards Baldoni being in the right because he’s actually talking about the themes of the movie, while Blake is trying to shill her own companies instead of the movie. And she looks like trying to force a barbenheimer moment with deadpool by having Ryan and Hugh Jackman show up at the red carpet.
i would argue that telling women the abortion pill is reversible would encourage them to take it thinking they can still change their mind, thereby causing more abortions
I’d argue that taking it with the assumption that it can be reversed, changing your mind and then losing the baby would be much more harmful than making the decision one way or the other
Its not an abortion pill ffs, its basically spermicide
reversing an abortion seems dangerous to me already, how would that potentially affect the fetus developmentally
@@MaidenHelll i agree. and not even assumption but like being told by professionals so you trust it
The claim that “I didn’t sexually assault my assistant, I was paying her living expenses” is so many levels of disgusting I don’t want to unpack
Did you pause to read all the tweets???? it goes further than that and all of that info is from a 3rd party. Not the alleged victim or perpetrator. The "victim" didn't share a single thing that could be counted as evidence while the other side has evidence.
I bet you also think Amber herd isn't an abusive partner who abused Depp smh
How did you get that misrepresentation out of that statement? Did we read the same thing? Even the pronouns changed wtf?
@@maimee1not everyone got the iq of a toaster like you do hun
@@maimee1are you really defending that pedo?
Yeah :(
I always felt like it was insanely disrespectful to call a woman "trans" or a "man" just because she's a little bigger or stronger than a normal woman.
Tbh, trans caused that issue. Ton of nonsense is going off
@@DrAngelKinsNo trans people literally didn't. Trans people just want to exist and have reasonable access to healthcare. Transphobia causing people to attack anyone who isn't perfectly feminine is the issue
@@DrAngelKinsNo, insane people like Rowling caused the issue. All the trans haters who are suddenly medical experts did, too.
Trans people have warned everyone that this will hurt cis women as well. But nobody listened.
If everyone and their mom would leave decisions to the experts, this mess would not exist.
@@DrAngelKins Misogyny caused the issue in the first place, trans people are just the new target since abusing cis women has become uncool.
@@DrAngelKins no trans people did not force tramsvestigators to do stupid things they chose to do it
A 5% regret rate is normal for **any** medical procedure. Knee replacement and heart surgery both sit at least 6%.
Normal for ANY medical procedure? Probably work on that phrasing. It would be pretty alarming if 5% regretted getting stitches for a wound, their tonsils out, or a bone placement and cast for a broken leg.
@@CMTZ11Oh, I’d bet you’d still get 2-4% for those. Ask 100 people anything & you’ll get at least a couple few ‘off’ answers.
Yup! PubMed has some articles about stuff like this. Their studies found a 14% regret rate across all surgeries and 8%-17% regret rate for having children. So a 5% regret rate for abortion isn't that bad.
😂 regret isn't the debate it's the whole should you be allowed to st4b the baby just because you can't see him or her and haven't met him or her yet.
@@Dloopgroop the debate is for people who can handle nuanced discussion, but just for you...
"My body is a temple, and castle doctrine applies."
CORRECTION: The below is for if police access geofencing data generally, but Phil said that geofencing WARRANTS are illegal, so police will likely have a much more difficult time accessing that data in the first place.
ORIGINAL COMMENT:
Lawyer here. For context on the Fourth Amendment issue. If the Supreme Court were to rule that police using geofencing data was barred by the 4th Amendment, that doesn't necessarily mean that they will stop using it to locate suspects. It does mean that they will not be able to use that evidence in court, which is still a huge win for protecting our rights.
I did lots of research into the 4th Amendment in law school, and it is scary what police can get away with, despite it being unconstitutional. For example, if the police broke into your home without a warrant and found evidence of someone else committing a crime, the police could use that evidence in court against the other person (but not you), and you may have no remedy under the law for the violation of your rights.
EDITS as of 8/15/2024:
Fruit of the poisonous tree (Wong Sun doctrine):
Some are bringing up the Wong Sun doctrine regarding fruit of the poisonous tree (i.e., evidence resulting from an illegal search is inadmissible). This does not rebut my illustration above. In the Wong Sun case (simplified), the police found drugs as a result of an unlawful search of Toy's laundromat. The drugs were inadmissible with respect to Toy because Toy's 4th Amendment rights were violated, and the drugs were found as a result of that violation (i.e., Toy was the victim). However, those same drugs were admissible against Wong Sun. To quote, "The seizure of this heroin invaded no right of privacy of person or premises which would entitle Wong Sun to object to its use at his trial." (371 U.S. 492) In other words, drugs were admissible in court against Wong Sun despite being a result of an illegal search against Toy because Wong Sun's rights were not violated in the illegal search.
Clarification:
When I say the police find evidence of someone else committing a crime in your home, I mean they search your home and find evidence that someone else committed a crime generally. Not necessarily that they found someone actively committing a crime in your home. However, either way, if that person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in your home (e.g., they are not living there), then their rights are not violated, and the evidence would likely be admissible.
Remedy:
When I say there is no remedy, I am talking specifically about vindicating your right not to be searched illegally. You may have a remedy for damage caused to the home (may depend on jurisdiction), but as far as vindicating your rights not to be illegally searched, there really is nothing beyond making any evidence against you inadmissible. This should give police no reason to search your home illegally as it would be useless for doing their job. However, if they did search your house illegally and find nothing on you, then there's really nothing you can do. So for the geofencing issue, police could still use it outside of court if they wanted to, but they would not be able to use it or anything that is a "fruit" of the geofencing issue in court. You would have no remedy for them knowing you were near the crime scene aside from having it dismissed in court if it got to that point.
Note:
I'm happy to engage in conversation, but I am not interested in engaging those who mistake ad hominem for legal analysis.
Not to be too political here but I agree with you 100% and the "constitutionalists" we see in power today are anything but. Barrett even argued that the 4th was "too wide for society to function". I personally believe there aren't any constitutionalists left, it's just a bunch of practitioners who dislike some amendments and enjoy others.
If you care about letting every person have a firearm because of the second, the polices violation of 4th and 5th should drive you insane.
@@kaingates Well the Supreme Court did just rule that presidents are basically kings, how's that for supposed foundational constitutionalists?
Are you sure you went to law school? You're forgetting the legal process required to just GET a warrant. If geofencing warrants are determined to be illegal, you just can't get that kind of warrant from a judge anymore.
When you say 'remedy' here. Like, getting money to fix any damage? Or something else
If someone else is committing a crime in my house, 99% of the time, I want that person stopped
@@trunkageAre you sure? Because the crime committed could be something as mundane as a cop seeing your friend smoking marijuana. I wouldn’t want the cops to have legal grounds to arrest them in a house they don’t have warrant to enter.
Things i will add to the india case: is the state government and local authorities are actually doing absolutely everything to sweep this under the rug and cover up as much as possible. Its been suspected that the principal of the medical college was involved in the crime and its part of the larger R-'culture' at this college. the government, initially put him on a paid leave and then, simply transferred him to another college and the Chief minister Praised him?!
Forensic reports say She was treated in a horrifying manner (her pelvis was broken, her spectacles crushed INTO her eyes) in her last moments and there were definitely multiple perpetrators. Yet when one man casually accepted charges and proclaimed he was the only perpetrator, the police happily accepted and tried to close case. This is after they initially tried to claim it as suicide!!! Suddenly, after it was announced that the CBI (indian equivalentof FBI) will take over the case from state police, thd college started "renovations" in the building, destroying the scene of crime.
I just hope this can bring large scale reforms in the country. Doctors and women deserve to feel safe in their workplace.
Imagine being so much in the public eye that people check that you're NOT FOLLOWING SOMEONE BACK as confirmation there must be drama between you... what a nightmare
Funny how the tweets stopped when the lawsuit started. JK knows that you can't just spout lies without any evidence to back up your opinion. Glad someone is finally hitting back. Unfortunately for Joanne, Imane hits like a girl. 💙
Hells yeah
lol hold on did you just use a sexist remark to bully someone about fake transphobia?
@@Paintslashgamingoh god you guys always have something to cry about 🤦🏽♂️ it’s not that serious. Your life will go unchanged.
So who decides what is a lie? Sounds like censorship to me.
Freedom of speech?
All should remember that Blake Lively has actively defended Woody Allen.
Also there's the old interview for her Woody Allen film that just came out where she acts like a mean girl to the interviewer. And you've got the whole plantation wedding stuff
@saernst No one is proven innocent in court, you're proven not guilty. Lawyers fight to find/establish enough doubt of your guilt.
@@arianam6430so nobody is proven guilty either then lmao?? Lawyers just made enough of a case to convince everyone I guess. Wtf kind of logic lmao, y'all have absolute faith in the justice system when it convicts Trump or someone you don't like, but when it convicts one of "yours" it's excuse after excuse lmfao. Paper-thin cultists
@@saernst Not enough legal evidence =/= didn't happen.
The standard of legal evidence is very high and many actively recorded assaults have had their perpetrator found not guilty.
Guilty people get away with shit everyday, and innocent people are refused appeals on their death penalty, the US legal system is broken.
@@arianam6430 You're kind of right. In US law, we have this wonderful phrase. "Innocent until proven guilty". I know in recent years with the expansion of social media that everybody wants to form opinions of innocent or guilty instantly, but according to the court of law, being proven "not guilty" is the same as saying "you're still innocent"
I’m so curious about that 5% of people who report regretting their abortion. I want to know how many regret it because they actually changed their mind about wanting to be pregnant, and how many regret it because they were shamed for their decision.
Very good question! And I’m being for real with this addition. How many lied to themselves when polled or were praised by certain groups or friends instead of shame..?
Yep, this is a lot like statistics on folks that reverse their gender transitions. Most who reverse do so because their friends and family alienate them, not because “oh it turns out maybe I’m not a wo/man”
Or how many regretted they were in that situation at all.
The idea that “a man shouldn’t have directed the film at all” when the two women in charge (producer with creative control and the author that wrote the damn thing) are out here pretending the movie is “50 first dates” is ungodly obtuse. Twitter doing what twitter does.
Regarding the wrongful death suit, SOUTH PARK WILL NEVER NOT CALL THESE THINGS. This Disney story has images of cuttlefish and vanilla paste popping into my head….
I suspect a lot of people critiquing Justin directing the movie do not know the work he has done challenging toxic masculinity. As a woman, I very much appreciate the important conversations he has on his podcast "Man Enough."
I was incredibly excited when I found out he was directing the movie exactly because of his emphasis on needing to focus on why men behave in certain ways and understanding cultural norms rather than blaming women. With all the terrible rhetorical toxic masculinity stemming from the Red Pill movement, feminism needs men like Justin.
Maybe there was drama on the set, I don't know. I will wait to judge until its more than speculation. I just don't like the idea of people trying to throw Justin under the bus after all the work he has been doing. I fear that type of response risks driving men to the Red Pill Movement rather than inviting them to participate in the feminist movement.
If his idea of helping women is putting all blame on men in unhealthy relationships, then I'm not listening. In her case I think it's ego. He was the director so what he says goes. That's the job. On the other topic I am tired of women not taking ANY responsibility for their own choices who want society to accept men in these situations are 100% to blame. Yes, men who cannot control themselves must take full responsibility for their actions but you only get away with what you're allowed to. We're seeing too often today those who refuse to accept any responsibility for their choices always casting around for someone/thing to blame for outcomes. It's not healthy and lessons can't be learned.
@@tkps What responsibility is a woman to take for being hit by an abuser? For being raped by a rapist? She did not do these things to herself. She did not ask for this to happen to her. Many women who have experienced SA experienced their first sexualization by adults before the age of 16. Your "take" is nothing but victim-blaming and exactly why this conversation should be had by people like Justin, not Blake.
@@BooksWithBourboni think he meant in general when relations dosnt work and there is toxic behavior from both sides, yeah, the point is talking specifically about SA cases and abusers, but an actual secret of culture manipulation, is that if you keep protraying real cases but just of a certain nature, people do generate reject and defense mechanism to general situations which often lead into hate speech and prejudice
The solution for this is not stopping to protray these cases because the fact is that they are real and must be heard, but balance it by protraying cases of other nature so you dont (accidentally) push a resentment narrative over the people who consumes it
@@angelarce9747You mean like a love story? Telling women to take responsibility in a discussion about DV toward women is a disposable take. There is no other side to that. Now, if you're trying to say the cases of DV and SA toward men should also be discussed, absolutely! But that is not what the commenter said. Putting words into their mouth only furthers the victim blaming.
@@BooksWithBourbon i dont mean love story, i mean giving voice of speech for cases where:
-The man is the one abused
-there are abusive behavior from both part, but no one takes responsability because their toxic behavior is justified as a responde from the other's
-gaslight (relation which there is no abuse at all but one of the part make it look like there was for the purpose for controlling the relation, basically victim blaming as abuse)
And yeah, as i said, i know the target wasnt that, but specififlly dv against women, im just saying that the constant victimism (that is justified, ofc, im not negating) if just 1 type of case, can lead to hate incitement because resent is a damn strong feeling, no, it is not victim blaming cause im not saying these victims should be shout, ignored, not listened, or dismissed, im saying all cases should be given voice equally without any kind of bias so you dont end up influencing in the viewers moral compass, say, after the metoo wave with all the series and movies depicting male as abuser and female as victim most of the time developed an new wave of feminism with a very marked resent and reject towards male (ive have seen so many misandric shit in media lately) which caused incels to gain more relevance in society and now gender talks always end up in gender war, its kind of ironic that things made to help us reach equality separated us even further, but thats basically the reason, giving the false sense that there is a enemy in common for a large group of people given the lack of diverse messages of other cases as theyve been depicted as the wrong for most of their life so its normal they tend to assume so
Idk if you get what i mean
Ahh yes, Faith Based Pregnancy Centers. My niece went to one after having a MISCARRIAGE. Rather than give her the D&C scrape or send her elsewhere they told her there was absolutely no need. She went into septic shock not long after. They are terrible people!
Pregnancy centers don’t normally offer D&C procedures as that is an actual procedure that uses general anesthesia most states only offer those at hospitals so I’m sorry your niece thought she could go there… I’ve had two miscarriages and I’ve always had to go through a doctors office that has you go to a consultation before they will even do the D&C and never have I ever had any pregnancy center ever offer those services and just to clarify so you know better in general the best option for miscarrying is to miscarry naturally(speaking from my own infertility journey) D&cs also carry risks and can also leave scarring in your uterus that can make future pregnancies harder so it’s unfortunately almost always doctors recommended to naturally miscarry if you can
@@jessicaalsum mind you business. You are not anyone's doctor and you do NOT know what is best for their specific miscarriage. MIND YOUR BUSINESS.
@@ashicks it sounds like you have never had a miscarriage or been apart of the miscarriage community, nor is minding your business even a valid argument to someone sharing something that they actually have lots of experience with medical doctors who have been through infertility so how rude of you to try and tell someone who’s actually experienced loss and infertility to mind their business… there are plenty of arguments you could present based on facts of why maybe you don’t like pregnancy centers but the fact you can’t even have a civil discussion tells me you don’t actually have a valid argument or can handle people having different opinions then yourself
And we have video of planned parenthood laughing about haggling prices over b4by b0dy parts.
Someone at Disney thought this was a good idea and a good response, we live in wild times.
A lawyer even! Wthhhh
A movie about abusing someone and all the promotional material is gas lighting? No waaaaay.
The It Ends With Us situation is ridiculous. Colleen Hoover books always romanticize the worse types of relationships. I was a fan in highschool and once I grew up realized they were terrible because of that. To me it feels like Justin tried to use the book and movie to tell a good story and Blake wanted to make another girl romance movie. Justin had been trying to make the movie for a while and fought for it now it been taken by other people. Obviously we will never know what happened behind the scenes but criticizing the person talking about DV as serious as it is while defending the people making light of it is insane.
How does It Ends With Us romanticizes abuse? Like Lily is naive to think her daughter is safe, but leaving an abuser is seeking freedom in a sense, even though she still has to worry. Just because Colleen doesn’t depict Ryle as a one-dimensional monster doesn’t mean she’s glorifying his actions.
Blake is being weird promoting the movie as a rom-com. The whole “grab your girlfriends and florals” is Bryson’s tacky. I’ve seen two trailers for this movie and it does hint towards abuse, but it can be easily overlooked.
@@junkoe119 There is literally a promo for the book that is simply a picture of the cover and text that reads "Discover the stunning romance behind the hit movie". Hoover even tried launching a coloring book and nail polish line when the book came out.
When people who love this book attack survivors because we don't call abuse love, we ask about what kind of therapy or aftercare the characters received in this story of healing, or explain that the trauma doesn't just go away but becomes a permanent part of us, there is something very wrong with the message.
Good thing she's suing, this type of mass cyber harassment is absolutely despicable.
I think it's hilarious
Freedom of speech?
What about Logan Paul being cyberbullied? I guess there are different standards
@@NickTheShark_ Defamation.
@@jonathanrothmare3509 Only a matter of time until something similiar happens to someone you know. Get the laughs while you can bro.
I remember watching your show back when it was the best show that wasn't really a show, but was just you talking to the camera for 3 to 4 minutes. Yeah... yeah...
My sister and i used to watch every new video you dropped back then. Thanks so much for being a part of my world!
Imane is so right to sue everybody's ass off on this one. We teach our kids that bullying, spreading rumors and treating other people badly is a big no, it's time we show there are consequences for grownups as well! I hope she's very successful with her lawsuit and ttgat she gets public apologies from everyone who did her wrong.
@@zachmondial2172my dude there's literally no evidence of that.
@@zachmondial2172 not that this rumor was proven to be true, but even if it was, genetics are a lot more complicated than that. If everyone had their chromosomes tested, I bet you MANY people would be surprised by the results.
She is 100% in her right to sue, cyberbullying and diffamation are not okay and should be punished.
@@zachmondial2172 yeah, first amendment only works in the US, she is suing them in France, which has different laws
@@zachmondial2172 and how is this protected when its liable, its literally a lie that if those spreading the misinformation just stopped and looked it up would know it was a lie, which they probably already knew when telling said lie! Shes fron a country that is blatantly anti trans. Why would theu send a trans person to represent them in the Olympics!!!
@@zachmondial2172the first amendment doesn’t work that way, it doesn’t protect people who defame, incite harassment, or create libel. It’s also irrelevant because the USA’s laws aren’t the world’s laws. And have you considered like, looking up the XY thing before saying it? Or actually checking any of what you just said before saying it for that matter?
We knew Disney was evil but man this is on a whole other level. Besides Disney getting sued the restaurant staff needs to be charged because their actions were not negligence but indifference.
Knowing that JKR has been suing people left and right, this is absolutely deserved
She did?
In this case she is wrong so yes it is deserved.
However she has sued people because they have been telling lies about her.
And there is still a lot of people who spread lies about her to make people hate her.
+
Didn't she say Khalif has XY chromosomes which is true?
@@havtor007who needs to lie about jkr when she is already hated for her actions
Disney just created a real life David Martinez. This is literally a defense that Vought Industries would use
And they could potentially turn the widow into the punisher possibly depending on what the courts rule 😢
Johnny Silverhand 🙏
I am 10000000% for this lawsuit with Imane Khelif. People in these position of power need to held accountable. This will never leave Imane. She will always have to deal with these allegations now, no matter what the facts are.
It’s a dangerous premise she is stating. Now people from other country’s have to answer to foreign governments over tweets! I wonder when vlad will get his turn at Americans opinions about him?
Seeing you don't believe it freedom of speech huh?
@@Juiceontheloose76so you believe in hate speech and misinformation huh?
@@Melanie-jy2nw not as much as you!
@@Melanie-jy2nw???? freedom of speech allows for all kinds of speech, you don’t have to agree with everything
Lol Jimmy wants to wait until all allegations are out there before he responds, so he can do a single blanket response. How many more allegations is he afraid of?
He is just waiting to see how much more he has had buried and hidden gets dug up..
LMAO I think the reason why he said that is cause the only time he responded was about Kris being a pedo , he had a team write some bullshit response where he basically was like my bad y'all I didn't know and then it got revealed in the discord leaks that uh he in fact DID 💀💀
So I think he was probably was like shit now I have to wait for everything to come out so I can make THE BEST AND THE MOST VIRAL APOLOGY 😈
That apology video is gonna be fabricated like his videos and response
honestly a lot of the things that has been brought up hasn't been proven at least imo, that lava guy is pretty much all ive seen been confirmed. kind of get his point of view if he can disprove a bunch of stuff, if a new thing pops after he will either A have to make yet another video or B look guilty.
I wouldn't be so worried about the Disney lawsuit argument if it weren't all happening in Florida. As much as Florida hates Disney, they hate poor people even more. So I'm a bit concerned this will end up setting a completely insane precedent.
I used to work at Raglan Road and they were always extremely cautious about allergies, having many trainings solely dedicated to allergy management. I’m shocked hearing about this news and really wonder what went wrong in their procedure. This situation is heartbreaking, even more so that Disney’s legal army got involved to add insult to fatal injury. My heart goes out to the family.
I’ve never subscribed to disney+ and now I never will, that’s insane…
Missouri here. They made abortions illegal in '22, and now we're trying to get abortion rights enshrined in our Constitution. As a father, with two very young daughters, I'll be voting, yes, and I hope it passes.
But.... It's not forced abortions? Allowing abortions doesn't mean that a cabal of lefty lesbians will burn an effigy to abortion on your lawn & force you to abort your 4 year old daughter. It's shockingly not about you.
But.... It's not forced abortions? Allowing abortions doesn't mean that a cabal of lefty lesbians will burn an effigy to abortion on your lawn & force you to abort your 4 year old daughter. It's shockingly nit about you
As a young missourian woman who just 2 weeks ago had to go to Illinois for an abortion, will be getting all of my friends to vote yes.
It is the boomerang effect.
They tried to ban same sex marriage in MN. The Momentum of the resistance got same sex marriage officially allowed in Minnesota
Best of luck yall. Everyone deserves a choice at the end of the day@aryannadraws8291
I bought into all the 'women who have abortions regret it and are more likely to kill themselves' stuff that the pro life crowd put out in commercials back in the 90s.
So when I chose to have one I expected a serious depression to hit me, but all I felt afterwards was the absolute certainty that I made the right choice.
Now, years later, I still feel good about my choice.
Absolutely have heard this before, wild but people end up feeling different for sure.
Happy you’re happy with your decision!
Just because you don't end yourself and regret doesn't mean there are not woman who regret and end themselves.
@@davidhansen9792 It fun how you can comment about your personally experience and someone will always jump in to point out that other people might have different experiences. No kidding. That's why my comment was about mine.
But while we're here, I do believe the claims of pro-lifers are exaggerated.
@@TKHaines and that is why my comment wasn't about you but other woman
How is abortion ever a good choice when adoption is always a choice? And to have the absolute gall to announce your actions in a comment section populated with young people that are easily influenced is just gross. Youll report me but it was worth saying my piece. Be proud of your actions but dont try to sway young people into an action they could easily regret. Just because YOU didnt regret it doesnt mean anything.
The last story: if you can't make or defend your point without lying, you don't have a point. No one, especially in healthcare at any capacity, should be allowed to spread information that is known to be false, fraudulent, or purposefully skewed to hide the truth.
Disney is actually insane for that.
Welp I just cancelled my disney+. Ducking psychopaths.
Too late, you already agreed.
@@Chimpy1 oh no, my dad signed up.. am I safe if I didn’t sign?
@@RedGoggles5285 actually yes. He’s the one that signed, not you.
@@Chimpy1 Let’s go!! I’m never gonna sign a contract without reading it to the deepest extent. Call it nitpicking but if there’s any loopholes for something like spelling bees.. let’s just say I’ll be signing up.
@@RedGoggles5285 lol this reminds me of Amy Santiago from Brooklyn 99. Also, the lesson learned from the South Park human centipede episode.
That schindlers list video is top tier.
Blake lively is genuinely psychotic for the way she’s promoting this movie. There are survivors and young women that have gone to theaters to see the movie without know it was even about domestic violence.
THIS
I say sue them. They went out of their way to promote slander her, she should get the stacks.
But how? I still don’t understand how you can sue from one country against people from another country. Especially the US, free speech is highly protected.
IBC has blood tests proving its a man...
@@NeonJ1 free speech as in protection from beong persecuted by the government for what you say. Doesn't meam there can't be consequences from other people when you do things like slander
@@NeonJ1 you can still be sued for slander and libel in the US, sport.
@@takaisilvr so in order for Iman to win, she needs to sue Elon and co in the states? I’m still not understanding how the lawsuit can cross countries.
RE: It Ends With Us
The problem isn't JUST the press surrounding the film. The book it comes from was already problematic. Hoover was selling a cutesy colouring book with quotes from the source material. It's ALL BAD. The author romanticizes abuse, why wouldn't everything else made from her work?
I've heard nothing but bad things about CoHo, hell my girlfriend LOVES romantic books but I always tell her to stay away from CoHo BECAUSE of the fucking romanticizing abuse. Why people buy that crap is beyond me.
I learned about geofencing when I was in 3rd grade and got called in as suspect in a bomb threat lmao
When I was little, I went to Disneyworld with my family. One of my family members has serious dietary restrictions, so they asked the waiter about having their food prepared a certain way. He stopped them dead in their tracks and left to get the head chef of the restaurant. My family member shared their dietary restrictions with HIM, and everyone's food was prepared exactly as needed. There were no issues.
The restaurant Piccolo and his family went to should have done this for him and his wife, but I guess the waiter hadn't been working there long enough to know any better.
Take care of YOURSELVES people! You got dietary restrictions? Don't talk to the wait staff, talk to the Head Chef.
The Disney story is the equivalent to Red Solo cup saying "you went to a party in 1993, therefore we are not responsible for you falling into our state-of-the-art Ball Crusher 5000"
Ryan Reynolds’s is having the best movie opening of his career while Blake is having the worst 😂
Whoever decided to turn that unbelievably stupid book into a movie deserves this terrible press.
@@auggiedoggiesmommy1734 Like, who thought that was a good idea??
MrBeast is running a "business" but can’t even write something formally, I can’t even believe that this is something he gives to employees, I am surprised he still has employees.
@Jonathan_Collins Are you kidding? You know how many managers across many companies I have had that talk about A, B and C level employees? A lot! It's not new or in anyway unique to Mr. Beasts team. That particular accusation is neither illegal nor uncommon. It's a nothing burger from someone desperate for more stuff to talk about and drive more traffic to their own content for their gain.
@BAM5636
there is a section of a document that is titled "NO does not always mean no"
you wanna defend a shitty frat millionaire? go right ahead and waste your breath on a guy that won't give you $1000 for being a subscriber
My opinion on It Ends With Us: Colleen Hoover is basically just a smut writer and It Ends With Us is pretty much 50 shades of grey marketing itself as "serious" literature about DV.
The problem is, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either market the movie as a serious film about DV OR a fun smutty dark romance. If do both at the same time, people are going to side-eye you.
From what I know about Justin Baldoni, he has a long history of being a relatively green flag feminist man. I genuinely don’t believe he’s the problem here, he’s just the one outnumbered.
Looks can be deceiving sometimes people will participate publicly in things to manipulate people into thinking that that’s how he behaves privately
@@tboyk_859 idk I’ve seen enough videos of Blake being a c word all over the place. She’s also so unserious about the very serious topic her movie covers. I think in general he just took this more seriously.
@@lexdsly but if you look at how she’s approached most of her movies, I’d argue that she’s been this same exact way. The point is people are trying to force her to act a certain way, instead of just being herself she didn’t say it do anything inappropriate and we know now that she wasn’t supposed to be the only one responsible for doing these run interviews. She was supposed to have her Co start there and he didn’t show up to most of them meaning she had to carry the entire interview. Your personal opinion on her being a c bag is kind of irrelevant (especially if you’ve never actually met her) when talking about if she objectively did anything wrong or if she’s objectively a bad person.
@@tboyk_859 I mean my opinion might be irrelevant but ultimately neither of us know her, know him, know the situation. But frankly I feel like her not talking about DV on the press tour but constantly talking about how she’s wearing florals is a bit out of touch🤷🏻♀️ you’re entitled to your opinion as am I
@@lexdsly no it isn’t. That’s just your assumption because you’ve already come to a preconceived notion about her as an individual despite the fact that you don’t know her for all. Which is exactly my point all facts that we have now don’t suggest that she’s doing anything the nefarious.
Jimmy is playing modern-day toxic CEO.
Showing that being a young CEO is just as toxic as being a boomer CEO.
Havnt watched the full video of what the document is. As far as the clip shows what is wrong with wanting the best employees possible?
@@Humuhumunukunukuapaait’s easy if you’re not a moron 😂
@@burnsboy101😅nice reply so since you have nothing of substance to add ill go ahead. Theres nothing wrong with only wanting the best employees Jimmy has always said hes obsessive about it and want to surround him self with other that are as well. As well as the comment about letting the talent do what they want yea thats pretty common lol most comedians in movies they will do a few shots readying the script and then they normally give them a few shots to rift and take the best and guess what alot of the time the improvised stuff im personally still waiting for some bomb to drop cause the most ive seen is all come from chris just acting inappropriately around kids the sa allegations are a bit of a joke. They were both adults it was all consenting but because they felt a different way about how things ended they then decided they were abused because of a power dynamic
@@burnsboy101 Most companies do that shit and now suddenly its supposed to be shocking because its Mr Beast. If you dont like how a company is run then just don't work there. Its not that complicated, people bitch and whine about how they were treated while working somewhere and then stayed there for 10 years. I find it hard to believe that were just 0 other options so it couldn't have been that bad that you didn't just quit. And if you keep working somewhere because of "pressure to preform" then you need to learn how to value yourself, if people wouldn't keep up with this shit like morons then those companies wouldn't exist.
@@JugganLoo all yap no substance
Aside from the fact that Disney did this, I have allergies as well and I can't tell you how often restaurants don't listen to me. I don't want to die, please don't take my request to not die as being picky or stuck-up, or like I'm trying to make your job harder. I, don't, want, to DIE! I think either the server or the cook should be examined for poisoning and negligence of customer health.
Dude. You should ALWAYS have your allergy medication on you if you're that allergic. No server nor cook is equipped to handle that high-risk of a customer. I'm not saying that it's in any way her fault, sounds like gross negligence, but the reality is the server is hired because of their affability and organisational skills. The cook is hired for their efficiency and capability to work under pressure. Nowhere are ordinary restaurants equipped to deal with extremely allergic people (hell, even Kraft aren't capable of making their ready to eat products allergen-free).
@@kaingatesmedication for anaphylaxis, aka epi, is short acting. It doesn't reverse, prevent, or cure the reaction, it's only meant to keep your airway open long enough to hopefully get you to the hospital. You still need to inform the restaurant of your allergy and hope they don't f**k it up and kill you accidentally.
@@kaingateswell to devil’s advocate a bit.
Going by another comment in the section for context. Disney restaurants have one kitchen for multiple restaurants. This practice creates much greater risks and is implying that the kitchen does not have allergens present in the kitchen that are not on the menu, when in fact there are likely many present in the kitchen that the foods prepared in. Besides if any restaurant doesn’t want to be held responsible it is as easy as saying that they can’t promise that the food is allergen free.
@@benjamin7871 the problem with your statement is that Raglan Road Irish Pub is not owned or operated by DISNEY its owned by paul nolan and John cooke
@@kaingatesI'm pretty sure she had her epipen and used it. Allergy medication is only going to so much
Disney showing their ass again. Should be broken up for antitrust.
Actually did a little cheer when I heard that poor woman is suing Elon Musk and JK Rowling for cyberbullying. I hope she gives them the same beating she gives her opponents...legally speaking, of course. Elon Musk was born a lost cause, but I still have foolish hope that Rowling will see the error of her ways. When she's face to face with someone she's hurt, maybe it'll respark that empathy I know she had, and is what made her write such good characters.
Jk isn't quite as bad as people say, but she has only been getting worse as people overreach to paint her as the biggest bigot ever.
Not to say she hasn't said some very stupid things, she absolutely has.
@@soulslikefan6760she is a holocaust denier
Ikr, it's sad that such a great author has such a horrible side to her. Like let people live their lives.
She could have retired in peace as a billionaire and gone down as one of earth's fav authors but no
If you think Rowling will see the error of her ways, you are far too optimistic, she has been a trash human especially against trans people for over a decade now. She has been dragged through the mud over these issues and many people have criticised her over it and she still is transphobic and just as hateful. She isn't going to change
@@soulslikefan6760And those stupid things have hurt people tremendously. Stop stanning for some celebrity like you know shit about them. You don't and never will know what she's truly thinking only the fact she's outright supported transphobes and used her platform to spread her disgusting nonsense.
Jimmy was a villain the whole time. Never trust a man with a Bieber haircut and fake smile
Exactly. See Ellen Degeneres
We'll find out what Judge is bought by Disney if they allow the company to win the case for the reason related to Disney+ terms. The insanity to follow if they do is beyond reason. That judge would indirectly be saying that a contract (e.g. terms of service) can literally be used to justify the killing of someone. Both "intentionally" and unintentionally, as intent is not necessary to look at. It's illegal to kill someone, but it's NOT illegal to avoid consequences doing so as long as said person accepted some arbitrary terms of service agreement to something completely unrelated. "Someone died partaking something in your establishment. Oh they agreed to a terms of service point that states they can't sue you because they bought a keychain at a Walmart 20 years ago that was made by your company? Checks out that they can't hold you liable then."
he also 'agreed' to it when buying tickets to the resort. They keep that out of it cause it doesn't sound as ridiculous than the Disney+ connection.
@@samhainnc9416 Disney themselves pointed out the Disney+ connection that's why. Literally, they pointed it out lol. Both Disney+ and the service used for the tickets purchased point to the same arbitration clause, since it's all encompassing. Because it's the same clause, it ultimately doesn't matter what was used as Disney's defense, as they're all literally the same. I'd imagine purchasing something from the Disney store online points to the same clause. Assuming that's the case, signing up to buy a Winnie the Pooh doll for a kid will (in this hypothetical) apparently waive the ability to take Disney to court if the same kid dies at one of their parks, even if the corporation is at fault. That's just absurd lol. I get arbitration is to prevent absurd lawsuits, but being at fault for wrongful death is very different from being at fault for getting the color wrong on a toy.
@@samhainnc9416 Disney Springs isn't inside the parks though, so that holds just as much water as saying the Disney+ subscription waives their right to a jury trial.
ITS NOT THEIR FUCKING ESTABLISMENT Raglan Road Irish Pub is not and never has been a disney establisment its owned and operated by irishmen paul nolan and john cooke
My fiancée did take the first dose and changed her mind afterwards. The baby did survive and is doing alright now.
We went for a scan before she took the drug and she was 8 weeks along. So far we have not seen any side effects and any tests show she’s healthy. She’s our bundle of joy.
I’m not saying it is always reversible but in my case she didn’t take the second pill and we pulled through alright.
Remind me to add "regain the ability to file for wrongful death" when Disney Plus asks me why I'm canceling. Need to resub first...
As a woman who was in an abusive relationship and has read the book in question, I can tell you that the book is a romanticized version of such a relationship. The author wrote it from the view of a child whose parents were in such a relationship and it is clear that she romanticized her father and saw the good in him. I find the book naive and offensive. I cannot tell you if the movie is the same, but I can tell you that the initial marketing implied the abuse and seemed to have that in the forefront, but later the marketing turned and seems to focus on the romance of the central couple. That I find offensive. This isn't supposed to be a story if love that faded it's supposed to be about an abusive relationship and the true implications of such, otherwise, what is the point?
To put it into perspective,
"is there a possibility this works? I will say until I'm blue in the face, 'Yes, there is a possibility it works,' 'is there any evidence that it works? None.'"
is the same thing physicists say about time travel.
The Disney story was so insane I literally gasped when Disney said the free trial was the reason that they can't sue
Imagine the person who thought the light-hearted romcom "It ends with us" would be perfect for a first date ?
"No thanks, I'll walk back home ALONE."