Electric may not be the future of driving.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 мар 2024
  • In the high-stakes race towards a more sustainable future, it seems the road less traveled might just be the one paved with innovation, if Toyota’s latest strategic gambit is any indication. A recently surfaced document, not intended for public eyes but now the talk of the town, suggests that the automotive behemoth is steering in a direction quite contrary to the current electric vehicle (EV) fervor. This revelation isn’t merely a footnote in automotive history; it’s a potential plot twist in the narrative of how we approach green transportation. At the heart of Toyota’s unconventional wisdom is a nuanced recognition of the roadblocks littering the path to widespread EV adoption. Chief among these is the looming specter of critical mineral shortages. As the appetite for batteries surges, so does the concern that our planet’s pantry might not be stocked enough to satiate the hunger. With projections estimating the need for over 300 new mines by 2035 to keep pace, Toyota’s pivot suggests a foresight in avoiding what could be a resource gridlock. The charging infrastructure, or rather the current paucity of it, presents another quagmire. For every EV driver who’s found themselves staring down a nonfunctional charger with a dwindling battery, Toyota’s skepticism towards the existing network might resonate deeply. The reliability of these charging stations, coupled with a baffling lack of standardization, can transform what should be a simple drive into a logistical odyssey. And then there’s the elephant in the room - the cost. Electric vehicles, for all their green credentials, carry price tags that can make wallets weep. Despite valiant efforts from governments and industry alike to make EVs more accessible, the financial barrier remains a significant deterrent for many prospective buyers. Enter Toyota’s intriguing proposition: the 1:6:90 rule. It’s a simple yet profound equation, suggesting that the minerals required to manufacture one electric vehicle could produce six plug-in hybrids or even 90 conventional hybrids. This isn’t just an exercise in arithmetic; it’s a compelling argument for a broader, more inclusive approach to slashing emissions. Toyota posits that by casting a wider net with hybrids, we can make a more immediate and impactful dent in carbon footprints. This strategic pivot isn’t an isolated incident. Other automakers are also tuning into this frequency, gradually shifting the industry’s chorus towards a hybrid harmony. This collective reevaluation underscores a critical insight: innovation isn’t always about wholesale transformation. Sometimes, it’s about refining and reimagining the tools at our disposal to make them work harder, smarter, and more inclusively for the planet. With an ambitious roadmap aiming for a 35 percent reduction in emissions by 2030 and a staggering 90 percent by 2050, Toyota is not just playing the long game; it’s redefining it. As the industry continues to adapt and evolve, the journey towards sustainable mobility is proving to be more of a marathon than a sprint. This race is not just about who can make the biggest splash with the latest technology; it’s about who can make thoughtful, inclusive decisions that pave the way for a truly greener future. In this quest for sustainability, Toyota’s hybrid strategy serves as a potent reminder that the path to a cleaner, greener tomorrow might just require us to embrace a spectrum of solutions, not just the ones glowing with an electric sheen. As the world grapples with the complex puzzle of decarbonization, perhaps it’s time to consider that the future of driving isn’t just electric - it’s eclectic.
    Our Websites
    www.ourautoexpert.com
    Check us out across social media!
    TWITTER:
    / nikjmiles
    FACEBOOK:
    / testmilesent
    INSTAGRAM:
    / ourautoexpert
    Tik Tok
    / ourautoexpert
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 28

  • @alanhowemusic2457
    @alanhowemusic2457 2 месяца назад +1

    Toyota are taking the more sensible approach towards a greener driving future. I for one totally agree with this approach.

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад +2

    Charging infrastructure can indeed be a hurdle! Unless you own a Tesla!
    So, why could Tesla, a young company, set up the world's best charging network by a country mile, while Toyota does... nothing?

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 2 месяца назад

      and in winter time you can wipe your butt with tesla chargers too

    • @st-ex8506
      @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад

      @@Mr11ESSE111 they ALSO work very well in winter time!

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 2 месяца назад

      i see in Chicago, 1 work 25 not@@st-ex8506

  • @nealkaye9056
    @nealkaye9056 2 месяца назад +1

    Not in my future.

  • @pstanyer1
    @pstanyer1 2 месяца назад

    Evs are great cars and will suit many people to be their perfect car. However they should not be forced upon everyone. They should just naturally be introduced and slowly as the technology matures they will if good enough take over completely. Once they give you 400 miles range at a reasonable £ 25k I will probably buy one.

  • @stevezodiac491
    @stevezodiac491 2 месяца назад

    In a word no, after 8 years ownership of an EV, having done only 40k miles ( i have other vehicles ). The battery has lost 33% capacity and range. As well as the many other logistical flaws with infrastructure, charging anxiety and slow journey times etc. etc. etc. My opinion of EV's is that they are just not fit for purpose and I will never buy another one.

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад

    Toyota startegy is simply and quite obviously totally off... to the point that Toyota might nor survive it!

    • @alanhowemusic2457
      @alanhowemusic2457 2 месяца назад

      Totally disagree with you. Toyota are taking a more sensible approach towards a greener drive future. All electric vehicles using Large Traction batteries with Lithium-ion chemistry is not the answer. These batteries are unstable and must be kept with an operating window. They rely heavily on liquid cooling systems to carry out this job function not such high tech at all and this is one of the reasons for battery failure. Believe me Toyota are taking the correct approach at this time.

    • @stevezodiac491
      @stevezodiac491 2 месяца назад

      ​@@alanhowemusic2457you are right, Toyota saw the EV crash before it actually happened. Toyota was correct.

  • @peterf1966
    @peterf1966 2 месяца назад

    Lol. All of a sydden Totota started referring to their hybrids, as 'self charging', and trying to pitch their 20 year old tech against full BEV.

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад +2

    Toyota is NOT taking a different route! It is taking the route heading straight to the cliff!

    • @stevezodiac491
      @stevezodiac491 2 месяца назад

      that is why they are selling so many cars, particularly hybrids and EV manufacturers have unsold cars, share prices falling and cutting EV production because of
      ' buyer reluctance ' ?

    • @st-ex8506
      @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад

      @@stevezodiac491 Toyota hasn’t started hurting, but is simply unprepared for the future.

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 2 месяца назад +2

    "EVs don't come cheap!" Well, that argument is still mostly true in North America and Europe... but EVs are already cheaper than ICE cars in China, and will be also elsewhere within a couple of years!

  • @twisted_panties
    @twisted_panties 2 месяца назад +4

    Ev is the future....you can't stop it with your fear and propaganda.

    • @Mr11ESSE111
      @Mr11ESSE111 2 месяца назад

      its shit ,its only toys for rich asses and some fools which would cry when their shit EV would be worthless as used 7-10 year old

    • @Seibanori
      @Seibanori 2 месяца назад +2

      no it is not, gas car maybe destined to be replaced one day but it’s most definitely not gonna be EVs. And just in case u don’t know, EVs could be a lot more polluting than a normal gas car if don’t handle well, which in most cases, don’t.

    • @martinsoelby5902
      @martinsoelby5902 2 месяца назад +2

      What is better ICE propaganda (expression of common sense) or mandated (forced) transition to BEV?

    • @simhz2221
      @simhz2221 2 месяца назад +2

      @@Seibanori Not true - even if using "dirty electricity" EV are considerably more clean (2 ton of CO2 a year) than even the cleanest ICE vehicle (5 tons of CO2 a year).

    • @Seibanori
      @Seibanori 2 месяца назад

      @@simhz2221 have u ever considered how we gonna deal with the battery after it’s done? Here’s the thing, unless we r able to figure out a way to recycle it, the only thing we can do is to bury it, but such action will be a huge pollution to the surrounding land that it won’t be able to use as any agriculture for hundreds of years.
      And even if we manage to recycle the batteries, it won’t be cheap, which means that it will be very costly when u change ur battery. In a free market society, it won’t stand a chance against a petrol car or whatever’s gonna replace it in the future. Plus, the metal that makes batteries which is Lithium is actually a very limited resource. This amount of massive production will most definitely means that in the near future, batteries will be more and more expensive, that might also affect the batteries we daily used.
      Also, last but not least, batteries are highly unstable in case u don’t know, and this is just something that we can’t do much about it. Especially when it comes to extreme weather such as extreme heat or cold, or strong impacts like damaging or firearms, there r many cases where electric vehicles exploded in an extremely hot day.

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 2 месяца назад

    EVs are "future" same as Horse carriage driving/ridding

  • @Mr11ESSE111
    @Mr11ESSE111 2 месяца назад

    ridding on Horses are "future" just like this shit EVs