He’s already patented all this stuff and proved it. It’s easy to sound intelligent when you’re just posting a comment and don’t have any research at all done. I don’t know how you’re typing honestly, when you have one thumb up your ass.
Thank you! Idk why people are entertaining his "theory" that a literal 8 year old learning how to do multiplication in elementary school could disprove 🤣
@@mpkgotbeatz2061 You have 1, but zero times. So you don't have 1 because you have it zero times. The first part of a multiplication is a hypothetical, it's an incomplete or unsolvable equation until you get the second part.
Yeah. He was too stupid to do the math on avengers, he released himself from millions and millions of dollars, he was certainly too stupid to see the pot of gold t the end of the rainbow, he and ed norton and eric bana were too stupid to catch a ride on the avengers train.
It is wrong, common sense went out the windows with mathematics. 1x0 can not equal 0 because you still have something there, the "1" 0x0 is 0 1x1 is 2 2x1 is 3 etc you are all wrong and it's actually funny living to man made standards and not looking deeper into what reality puts in front of us.
Terrence Howard doesn't agree with the periodic table of elements and neither does Chuck Norris, because the only element Chuck Norris cares about is the element of surprise.
But Terrence knows precisely how Chuck did it! Chuck has 1 infinity which he multiplies by 1 infinity = 2 infinity. I don't get it, but if we're going to believe a dude who identifies as a toaster's crumbs then ...
The funny thing is his point went right over your head. He’s saying what we learned is wrong. It’s funny to me how instead of actually thinking about what he is saying people just dismiss it. This is what’s wrong with the world today.
@@SpiritualguyyyHe just claimed that 1x1=2. Unless that second 1 is a variable that equals 2, the statement is completely wrong. Do you have more context than the rest of us do?
negative numbers are a government conspiracy. They didnt even exist until modern times. It was invented by the IRS so they can tax money you dont have and put you in dept forever
@@rickyz8531 That's exactly what it is. Multiplication is just repeated addition. 1 x 3 is 1+1+1 (1 three times). What Terrence fails to realize is 1 x 1 is just 1 a single time and not 1+1.
Yeah but what Terrence is arguing is not Kindergarten math it’s more philosophy. It’s more in the realm of how zero wasn’t widely used in math until millennia after basic math was established.
he calls walking faster man get it right!!! and thats only bc crawling had already been established and he knew he couldn't get away with another controversy 😂
I mean conceptually you're not far off and the fact nobody here seems to see it is scary. You can not have 1x0 because you can't have absolutely no energy. It's impossible. And the fact that the idea of nothing does exist within our mathematics, makes everything after, infinitely wrong as well. That's literally how simple his concept is. Our multiplication does not fit what our actual reality is, and he's right.
Dude had over 70+ patents that’s global companies use till this day. He invented a few things, I think you’re just stuck on the internet too much to do some research before you start typing. Before you reply, go look his shit up.
You looking at a 5D problem with 3D glasses bruh. NOW LETS TOAST so How bout you go grab you beer & I grab mines which is one times one & we say "CHEERS" to two beers. 🍻 'ALL YA FUNDAMENTALS ARE OFF'
@@freindlyghost4829 I ain't drinking a beer with you you can't even formulate a coherent sentence. You use improper grammar. Nothing you say has any validty because it's immediately discredited by the simple fact you can't even do something as basic as speak.
Well saying "that's how I invented dltangental math" ego screams validation bc we all know to truly learn and create it's a group affair so who are his teachers and collaborators bc this screams pretentious
Terrence is living proof of why we shouldnt give celebrities and actors a voice about ANY important subject. Climate change, other social issues, and math included.
If celebrities are speaking to accepted science and data driven research then have at it. Climate change and evolution are data driven accepted science with irrefutable evidence backing them. But when a celebrity starts saying they’re smarter than the scientists then yammer on about things that a 2nd grader can debunk, it’s time to take the mic away. 1X1= 2… what a complete imbecile.
But you don't believe the scientists on any of that shit either, you prefer to listen to *checks notes* an adulterous reality television show host turned convicted felon
There are intelligent artists and actors. It's actually ignorant to suggest we ignore a person's commentary and opinions on important issues simply because they are entertainers. 🤦♀️
@@LoneRanger-et7gq I guess you are counting Gretta Thunberg in the valid category? With the exception of maybe Reagen name the last celebrity that did anything of value outside of hollywood....*crickets*
This what ppl used to call Tesla and other genius for challenging conventional science at that time until they proved everyone wrong remember when ppl thought the world was flat and you would fall of the edge of you to too far west ? Then colon did and discovered a new continent everything is relative my brother don’t be a hater
Terence is clearly mentally I at this point. And as a Black mathematician and physicist and educator it’s sad to see someone this wrong. His biggest issue is doesn’t know what multiplication means so HIS fundamentals are wrong.
Terrence isn't wrong and logically 1x1 could only equal 2. The only way it dosen't. Is that you have to change the language and definitions of Multiplication and Times. Times is plural not singular. Multiplication meaning to multiply. The "X" in the equation means to multiply. It doesn't mean anything else. So, either 1x1=2 or 5x5=5. Which is it? Both logically can't be true.
Bro, multiplication was invented as a way to shorten addition. So instead of saying 1+1+1+1+1=5 multiplication was created to shorten that to 1x5=5 (you have 1, 5 times) so 1x1=1 (you have 1, only once)
@@aawiggins314159 It's not a matter of understanding. It's a matter honesty and language used to describe the function of calculations. 1x1 should be removed from the table. Otherwise is a lie. You could say "1" is a representation of a whole number that can't be divided or multiplied by itself. Once you call it multiplication or say times, plural and not time, singular. You just lied and then you could only say it equals 2.
@@andreroy8141 This is mathematics not a court of law. “Honesty” is not the point. Multiplication as we’re discussing is a definition. And understanding is the ONLY point. Terence (and those like him in their armchair zealotry) do not understand what multiplication means within the context of mathematics a dm it’s very precise about what Al the terms are referring to and their relationship to one another. There’s nothing false about 1 X 1 = 1. This is a TECHNICAL expression and you can’t simply come in and try to redefine things arbitrarily. And you wouldn’t do this in any other field as well.
@@rexenoshi I haven't done a deep dive on the tangential flight. I didn't even know what it was when you wrote it. After looking it up, it looks like 6 hexagons with propellers on the inside attached together. What can this accomplish that is of any tangible value? Does it use lower levels or energy to fly? Has it increased the speed of flight? Has it lowered material costs for flying vehicles?No, no, & no. This is no scientific or engineering value unless it accomplishes something new or creates new scientific knowledge. Don't see how this toy does any one of those things. Also why do you think Terrence Howard lied about having a phd in chemical engineering from SCSU? When you figure that out, then maybe you'll be better at spotting grifters in the future.
@@Kami84 last time I checked Isaac Newton didn’t have a phd yet I bet your dumbass still believes in gravity. Just because he isn’t explaining how his mind works to make it so you understand it doesn’t mean he isn’t a genius. Infact the bulk of people who are, are treated just like how Terrance Howard is being treated. Seen as Crazy people or mad men until our understanding catches up. But aye I’m sure your explanation of hexagon 6 propeller toy explanation of how the movement and the flight works will go down in history.
What happens when you pour water on a gremlin. Does it multiply itself? And, can you pour water in thin air and get a gremlin? No Terrence is saying the word multiply should mean when you start with a value greater than 0 and enlarge it. But, words don't govern how numbers work.
@tae2910 yes, 1 TIMES 1 = 1. But what happens when you get a gremlin wet? It multiplies into 9 more gremlins. So, 1 MULTIPLIED 9 times equals 10. Or 1 DIVIDED 9 times equals 10? It's a grammar issue. This is why we don't use grammar to do math. Words can mean multiple things where a number is always the same. Edit: The idea Is that the word multiply is like the word "clone". You can't clone nothing, so you need something to clone/multiply. It's basically compounding interest. We already have formulas for this. Either way someone wants to use the word multiply, we already have a way to use it. Terrence howard is unaware of this. Also, TIMES is just an addition function.
If he wasn't so fortunate to become rich as an actor, he would be that guy talking gibberish on the street corner instead of on podcasts spewing nonsense.
Unfortunately his math doesn't work for me. I tried multiples 1£ but I was always ending up with what I started I wish for once he could demonstrate his stupid beliefs. Not just claiming it
He’s totally wrong! He is equating mathematics multiplying with increasing amounts. Multiplication does NOT increase any numbers. It is saying, “This number that number of times is this total number.” There is NO NUMBER that is made larger when you multiply two numbers. The total number you get, using positive whole numbers, is always going to be larger than the first number, UNLESS YOU ARE MULTIPLYING BY ONE because it is saying that there is only 1 of that first number. Multiply in math does not mean a number gets larger. It means you are counting groups! *Does Terrence Howard x 1 = 2? NO! But Terrence Howard says it DOES! Terrence show me where the other Terrence is???*
I get the logic whether it's right or wrong. So lets say you have 1 apple and times it by zero, you would still have that 1 apple... right? 0 x nothing would = 0, but as soon as you say 1 apple, it exists, and you have something regardless of what you times it by so 0 x 1 = 1 because the apple exists. It sounds weird but i can see how someone might come to that conclusion. So, 0 = nothing, 1 = something but the real kicker is how can you have something from nothing??? Therefor something had to already exist 😁
@@republicofcasualsNah, man. An apple times zero is zero. That is to say, if you have one set of zero apples, you have zero apples. Or if you have zero sets of one apple, likewise. That's what is being communicated in 1x0=0.
@@crushinnihilism it's actually not a good argument and it's just verbal slight of hand. In mathematics multiply doesn't mean icrease by that's what addition is. If you increase 5 by 5 that's 10. Multiplication signifies how many sets of that number there are. If you have 5 x 5 for example that means 5 sets of 5 added together which gives you 25. That's why we call it "times" we're saying how much you get when you count 5, 5 times
Yeah but "celebrity" is doing some heavy lifting. The only reason you know this dude is because of the unhinged nonsense he's saying. He's at best a D list celeb. If this was Taylor Swift or Trump sure I'd get it but this dude?
@BlueLightningSky He may be less recognized by younger generations. I remember him from Iron Man and Hustle & Flow. He's D list now, and barely more than D list then. But he's recognizable enough that the uneducated will believe him and point to his celebrity status as if he's credentialed to speak with authority on anything.
Seeing people like Terrence Howard really makes me value my intelligence. Thank goodness, my parents got together over a mutual respect for each other's minds. The older I get, the more understand how much of an avantage it is to have a rational and reliable mind.
Never forget this is the same guy that thought he should be paid an equal amount as the main star Robert Downey Jr, for playing a supporting character 😂. They were wise to ditch his stupid a$$ and get Don Cheadle.
It's just a simple application to explain METAPHYSICS and not just physics. His application explains occult principles which is hard to put in a mathematical written expression. The tree of life
Tbf we've also been to space with calcs based on Newtonian physics which have since been replaced with better models. Not really the best measuring stick for math
@@sunwukong32 Firstly, you're wrong. Newtonian physics haven't been "replaced", they've been suplemented in extreme areas (atom scale and cosmic scale). Secondly, this man is questioning the basic building blocks of the fucking universe and everything we've ever built, not high level theories.
@@cpthrki5852 firstly, I didn't say anything about Terrance Howard. I said using successful space travel as a measuring stick for accurate math is problematic. If you want to challenge that notion, you'll have to do it without appealing to the incredulity of a claim I never even made. Secondly, in the context of the topic I was discussing, Newtonian physics have been replaced with better models. The first step in space travel is overcoming gravity. Do we still follow the Newtonian view of gravity? No. Do we still use the same equations based on the old model? No. They have been replaced.
@@sunwukong32 it's not problematic because basic operation like multiplication are the building block of any models. Terrence or the guy commenting aren't commenting on high level models.
Terrance Howard is not crazy and the calculator is not broke. He just doesn’t understand the fundamentals of mathematical philosophy and that has nothing to do with his intelligence. He a very intelligent person, and like lots of intelligent people he is mostly concerned with his ego. Theoretical science is a continuum and his quest is to be singular and smarter that everyone else greatly impedes his ability to understand these things. He’s unconcerned with contributing to human understanding of reality he’s try to exalt himself above everyone else for his own purposes.
Whats crazy is i forgot he was even in iron man one lol i legit for some reason always had it in my head that don cheadle was always war machine, he jus fits the role i guess but now that i remember terrance being war machine he also gave a great performance. Dont know how i forgot about that completely lol
5 x 1= the # of times he's been arrested for assaulting women. And everything coming out of Terrance Howard's mouth should be multiplied by B.S. to the infinite power.😂
@@PremiumPIus a government authority or license conferring a right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention. "he took out a patent for an improved steam hammer" Do you even understand why patents are important?
@@wolfmand9641 he has zero patens of value and some design patents that's not any invention at all and a couple of real patents that have no use case and are just impractical solutions solving no problem or issue at all.
@@wolfmand9641his parents are worth shit and should be dismissed after ANY analysis, because you can’t patent anything like this, I mean those shapes he „invented” can count as art, and art can’t be patented… so 😂😂😂😂😂
@@danbrown3103 terrence is pretending ... he doesnt know ... in real world math works ok, but if you go to quantum world 1 * 1 = 11 ... because string can vibrate in 11 different dimensions ... 1 action 1 string 11 different outcomes ... math even support this ... BUT the way he is explaining is obvious that he read something, doesnt graps the idea and now he is trying to replicate it ... butchering it completely
Having one object present is 1. Having two objects present is 2. You cannot multiply those to objects. What you can multiply is the number of people who have that ONE object, or two of those objects, etc. So you end up with the number of those objects. Are present. It is a operation that deals with a number of sets that you have. Not an operation that increase ANYTHING. It is only figuring out what you already have. NOTHING IS INCREASING IN THIS OPERATION. Multiply, as in increasing the amount of something that you have IS ACTUALLY ADDITION. ADDITION increases the amount, where as MULTIPLICATION allows you to figure out how many of those things, or that amount, is ALREADY THERE.
For all of you defending this guy, if what he is saying is right and the math we are using is wrong, there would be no: Buildings Bridges Computers Phones Eye glasses Cars.... All of human inventions and technology are science based, and math is the language of science. Let that sink in.
Not necessarily if we're all using the same calculations it wouldn't matter think about it as long as we both get the answer 4 it didn't matter how we got to 4 1+1+1+1=4 2+2=4 3+1=3 etc so if they all had the same scale it wouldn't affect the outcome. It's different when you think of it from the perspective of imagining the zeroeth dimension but it was a conceptual thought experiment thing that would not function so IDK it's he crazy I mean we been lied to about a lot this would just be 1 more lie IDK WTF to believe anymore man who knows.
This is why education is important.. The other twp guys arent even equipped to argue back so instead of nipping the convo they let Terrence spew insanity into mass media LOL
The fact that no one is just saying he's out of his mind is a huge critique on the education in America or how little people care about the integrity of Terrence...
This makes me realize why he’s been labeled “difficult to work with”. This man’s been holding on to the idea that he’s been right about 1x1=2 since the third grade. He’s be a nightmare to argue with about anything.
I genuinely thought that the amount of people that Re THIS STUPID wasn't enough for this guy to get any meaningful support. I was wrong. People are calling him a genius. I should have been a fraudster 😂
“They programmed that lie in the calculator!” As a programmer, if there is one thing computers are good at, it’s manipulating numbers very fast. It’s not just with arithmetic either. Whether someone is using a calculator, watching a RUclips, browsing Facebook, or literally anything else on a computer, it is ultimately manipulating 1’s and 0’s extremely fast. So yeah, maybe this guy is just dumb and is talking about a field he has no expertise in and claiming to be an authoritative figure in that field, like a charlatan. Please stick to acting. You’re clearly good at it.
The function is "f(x) = x(x)" if x=1 then "f(1) = 1(1)". Multiplication is a contraction of a factor. If I scale something from 1 along a ratio of 1:1, then you get 1 because you did not change it at all. If I have 1 apple per set (1/1) and I have 1 set of apples, then I have 1 apple. You are not comparing 2 things. You are scaling 1 thing by a factor of the second value. If I have 2 sets where the set is 1 apple per set, then I have 2(1/1) = 2/2=1.
@@heyalun just realized I made that typo lmao. I meant 1x1=1 but I guess my brain was so focused on 1x1=2 that that’s what I wrote. Not gonna fix it tho since it’s pretty funny.
For those of you who don't know, mathematicians settled this in the 1800s. Long story short, the real numbers (i.e , all the numbers we commonly use) are something called a field. A field is a mathematical object that is the basis for a lot of the math we use (e.g. addition, multiplication, division, calculus, etc.) Every field must have something called an "identity element" for multiplication. The identity element for multiplication (call the identity element i) is a number such that i × x = x for any number x For the real numbers, we define 1 as the identity element for the real numbers. So if we let x =1, we see that 1×1 =1 So Terrence is wrong. He is wrong because BY DEFINITION 1 x 1 = 1. Kudos if you read this. 😁
Is an identity means 1? I don’t think so. And what if our identity element is 2 or anything else? In such case the above demonstration will collapse. For my part we should pay attention to what Terrence is raising.
@abdoulkadermoussasiddo1946 There is a little bit more to the explanation I gave. The real numbers are a specific kind a field called an ordered field. Essentially, this means that all the numbers have a specifix order (i.e. -2 < 3 , pi < 4, etc). By definition, 1 is the multiplicative identity for the real numbers and 2 defined as 1+1. We can define other numbers in other ways as well. For example 3 is just 2 +1 where 2 is defined from before. 4 is just 3+1, etc. One thing you might notice is that we are kind of "building" the set of real numbers. We started with the idea of a field with a mulitplicative identity and then we defined the numbers 2, 3, 4, and so on. Without adding too much complexity, every field must have two operations with two identities for those operations. For the real numbers, the two operators are multiplication and addition. 1 is defined as the multiplicative identity (i.e. 1×x = x for any number x). 0 is defined as the additive identity (I.e. x+0 = x for any number x) There is more to this. All members of a field (other than the additive inverse) must have a multiplictive inverse. Furthermore, every memver ofna field must have an additive inverse. This gives us negative numbers and fractions. Something called the axiom of completeness gives us all the other numbers. I know this is a lot, but the point is that all of these ideas are formalized.
@MrOod67 We define multiplication as: a×b = a added to itself b times. For example, 2×3 = 2+2+2 =6 In the case of 0×1, you have 0 added 1 time (i.e. just zero). So it is just zero.
@@fireburnseverything I was actually asking specifically regarding the field theory you mentioned and the identity element, but having re-read your original post I see now I misread the equation: I read it as i * x = i, which obviously isn't correct in most cases.
I flipping LOVE this so much. It brings all the crazies to the surface, all the people who refuse to speak but think like this. This is exactly the same as the bear in the forest scenario!!! LOL!!!
When I was in grade school, I remember observing the sheer idiocy of most of my my peers. Only a few of us would "get" lessons and do "well." I imagine most classrooms are like this in inner city "unprivileged" schools (as those I attended). Those "slower" kids are now all grown up and in society.
@@roqbar8764 Lol something about that does sound quite familiar. These are definitely the people who have strong opinions, but absolutely no argument under critique. Have you met gen z? I'm gonna say without a doubt, direct correlation between behavioural trends, society in general, and the advent of social media. I did very poorly in school because I had no one to model success to me or even the baseline standard of participating, rather the opposite our family was about non-participation and reliance, it took time and hard work to re-organize behavioural patterns after I grew up and moved out of home after school. I know people aren't equal when it comes to processing power lol, but that's been hamstrung in this generation by a bottleneck, they're completely brainwashed and dependent on 10 second shorts. Dependant on an ideology that pervades everything, and to them overcomes all rationality. It feels very similar to what i'm seeing in the comments everywhere about the Terrence Howard interview, It's worrying. Part of me wonders if it's not just something, some department somewhere is using to gauge public opinion, like a litmus test to see how malleable the public is, or at least on facebook and social media lol.
@@davidhardy3074 Interesting (especially your last sentence). Thank you for your thoughtful insight. I agree, though contradicting myself, that "social" media is affecting behavioral trends and society. This comment section is a glimpse to those effects.
@@roqbar8764 I fully agree with you mate, it was like that at school for me too. For me, i'm not a team player never have been. Do poorly on teams, and great by myself.
When it comes to positive integers it really is repeated addition. Even with more than one factor it can be taken two factors at a time and rewritten as simple addition, simplifying as you go. In this case 1x1 is clearly 1. Claiming 1x1 = 2 is clearly bonkers. You have one quantity of one value, and the value is 1. The sum of that single value of 1, is 1. Then again, terrence once told rolling stone that we are told the square root of 2 is 2... which of course we are not told that and it isn't that. He just doesn't understand at all.
@Nyxantos-rm2zx you know his material doesnt come from him.. he knows what he is talking about he jus has different views.. but hey i bet you still think neil degrasse tyson knows what he is talking about or professor cuckoo😉
He’s like the Steven Seagal of math
🤣🤣
😄
😂😂
😂😂
Facts
It's easy to appear intelligent in front of idiots.
He’s already patented all this stuff and proved it. It’s easy to sound intelligent when you’re just posting a comment and don’t have any research at all done. I don’t know how you’re typing honestly, when you have one thumb up your ass.
I liked this comment, because you seem super smart!
💯
@@user-oj4lx3sy5geither this is irony or comedy. Either way made me laugh lol
@@MandelaFreemansatire is the word you are looking for.
I owed Howard some money, and I'm glad he realized that if I give him 50 dollars just once, it actually makes a total of 100 dollars. 🤪
HAAAAAAAAAAA
@@thegroovyhead By reiterating the process with the result, over and over again, any number equals any other number 😂.
They need fo change the equation to just x1 so it doesn't confuse peepo
Like a Mofo
You overpaid. 50x1 is 5,000. He owes you $4,900.
We’re really living in Idiocracy when a person making such claims doesn’t get immediately laughed out the studio.
1x1 is saying you have 1, 1 time which is 1. Please do not swim on the deep end of a shallow pool and call yourself a deep sea diver.
Thank you! Idk why people are entertaining his "theory" that a literal 8 year old learning how to do multiplication in elementary school could disprove 🤣
So by that logic 1x0= what then? Following your logic 1x0 is saying you have 1 multiplied by nothing would that still not be 1?
@@mpkgotbeatz2061 No it would mean that you have zero ones. In other words you don't have anything.
@@mpkgotbeatz2061
You have 1, but zero times. So you don't have 1 because you have it zero times. The first part of a multiplication is a hypothetical, it's an incomplete or unsolvable equation until you get the second part.
@@Will-ts9rl so 0x0
Imagine being wrong, but totally confident about it
Well then you can join the GOP.
Pretty much every conspiracy theorist out there
@@SkywalkerSamadhiY'all racists just mad that a Black Man be debunking your false math 😂
@@gfys756 i pray to god that this is a joke💀💀
You’ve described every religion in the world. Thanks
"What does the calculator say?"
"1×1=1"
"SEE IM RIGHT ITS BROKEN"
I wonder if he uses the same math when negotiating his movie contracts 😂
🤣🤣🤣
Exactly 😂😂😂
It worked out well for him in Iron Man 2; didn’t it?! 🤪🤪🤪
One dollar one time equals 2 dollars.
Yeah. He was too stupid to do the math on avengers, he released himself from millions and millions of dollars, he was certainly too stupid to see the pot of gold t the end of the rainbow, he and ed norton and eric bana were too stupid to catch a ride on the avengers train.
"Are those my only two options?" 😂😂
I enjoyed that line than all the story 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That hella sent me 😂
Terrence thinking like "oh shit he's right" then says "or am i right!?!" lmfao
Host was lookin for an out so bad lol
That's what we all ask every presidential election
Terrence Howard is living every kid in schools dream rn saying that the math is wrong not him
🤣 🤣 🤣
Truth 😂😂😂
It is wrong, common sense went out the windows with mathematics.
1x0 can not equal 0 because you still have something there, the "1" 0x0 is 0 1x1 is 2 2x1 is 3 etc you are all wrong and it's actually funny living to man made standards and not looking deeper into what reality puts in front of us.
You can't say 1x2 is 2 but then say 2x2 is 4 it does not make sense and does not work. It has only worked to this day because we belive it works.
@@p3xlastname964 Maths is not physics buddy. It's an abstraction.
If you cant dazzle them with facts. Baffle them with bullish!t that's Terrance Howard's new acting role
Nah, Fauci broke the simulation . Everything is in question now - especially all the historical “debunking of W. Russell and J. Keely
😂
Good One lmao!!! 🤣
That's how he got his way in to acting in a firts place. He lied on his resumé according to him.
Marvel clearly made the right choice going with Don Cheadle
When Terrence looks in the mirror, his reflection asks for an autograph.
He sees 2 people in the mirror, because 1x1 is 2.
@@user-do1sr9wg1wcame here to say exactly this
😅😅😂
😅, and at times he says to himself "damn, I'd let that dude hit it "😂😂😂
😆😆
Terrence Howard is trying to figure out how Chuck Norris counted to infinity twice.
Underrated comment
Terrence Howard doesn't agree with the periodic table of elements and neither does Chuck Norris, because the only element Chuck Norris cares about is the element of surprise.
But Terrence knows precisely how Chuck did it! Chuck has 1 infinity which he multiplies by 1 infinity = 2 infinity.
I don't get it, but if we're going to believe a dude who identifies as a toaster's crumbs then ...
Who the hell is Chuck Norris 😐 That's the first time that question has ever been asked!! 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 awesome!!!!!
What i love more than him is his supporters who actually defend him on all this stuff
He puts the "mental" in fundamentals
This guy is brilliant. He's building a following off the portion of the population that legitimately doesnt understand elementary level math 😂😂😂
The funny thing is his point went right over your head. He’s saying what we learned is wrong. It’s funny to me how instead of actually thinking about what he is saying people just dismiss it. This is what’s wrong with the world today.
@@Spiritualguyyy 1 x1 = _
@@SpiritualguyyyHe just claimed that 1x1=2. Unless that second 1 is a variable that equals 2, the statement is completely wrong. Do you have more context than the rest of us do?
@@Spiritualguyyy1 instance of 1 is 1. You are a fool. 😮
@@colebyrnes7889It’s wrong because they call it multiplication. It should be reworded
Math was so good he created a sequel
Bars
🤣🤣🤣🤣 underrated comment!!
It's just symbols in 2d form we call numbers and has balance in 3d form and our perspective is the 4d. Hold my 🍺😂
Lol
@@howardblaylock3490are you making this up lmao
1x1 is 2 ... As a registered nutcase, I approve of this message 👍
😮🤫🤔
😂😂😂
And as a tangential flight technician I approve of both your comments
@@Roger-ck3tu This is a real life example of tangential flight outmaneuvering everyone: watch?v=aX-zSBU4bCs&t=59
negative numbers are a government conspiracy. They didnt even exist until modern times. It was invented by the IRS so they can tax money you dont have and put you in dept forever
If his calculator says 1x1=2 then that calculator is definitely broken🤣🤪🤦♂️
I think Terrence saw 2x2=4 and said, “Multiplication is just addition with a longer name.”😂
Immediately thought of Rick & Morty…
Just addition with extra steps 😂
Nah bro...if we was gonna "match" a blunt then thats a times in this factor and tell me you don't have 2 blunts? 🧐🤣🤣🤣
@@rickyz8531 That's exactly what it is. Multiplication is just repeated addition. 1 x 3 is 1+1+1 (1 three times). What Terrence fails to realize is 1 x 1 is just 1 a single time and not 1+1.
That's actually what multiplication is. 2X3 is 2 added 3 times
😂😂😂
You know the education system is fucked when people start debating kindergarten math
Dude I always knew I was a little smarter than most but never realized just how dumb soo many ppl are not even being mean lol
😂😂😂
Idiocracy really became real.
Yeah but what Terrence is arguing is not Kindergarten math it’s more philosophy. It’s more in the realm of how zero wasn’t widely used in math until millennia after basic math was established.
@@Byronic19134nope. He’s arguing math.
now I know why they fired him from Iron Man
Bro wanted to be polite. "Are those my only two options" 😂
Terrance multiplied walking by walking and invented jogging.
IIRC jogging was discovered when someone tried to walk twice at the same time
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
he calls walking faster man get it right!!! and thats only bc crawling had already been established and he knew he couldn't get away with another controversy 😂
I mean conceptually you're not far off and the fact nobody here seems to see it is scary. You can not have 1x0 because you can't have absolutely no energy. It's impossible. And the fact that the idea of nothing does exist within our mathematics, makes everything after, infinitely wrong as well. That's literally how simple his concept is. Our multiplication does not fit what our actual reality is, and he's right.
Literal mental illness. I hope he gets help
What's scary is how many people don't know enuf and aren't bright enuf to see it.....
@@ghost9-9ghostreal 😭
That probably isn't happening. He's wealthy and powerful enough to isolate himself.
@@ghost9-9ghostENOUGH
Dude had over 70+ patents that’s global companies use till this day.
He invented a few things, I think you’re just stuck on the internet too much to do some research before you start typing.
Before you reply, go look his shit up.
Tangential math? Oh he's on a tangent alright
Boy, I tell you.....confidence is like a magic trick with the right audience.
"I didn't understand maths, so i invented a whole new system"
You looking at a 5D problem with 3D glasses bruh. NOW LETS TOAST so How bout you go grab you beer & I grab mines which is one times one & we say "CHEERS" to two beers. 🍻 'ALL YA FUNDAMENTALS ARE OFF'
I guess 2 x 1 = 3 then😮@@freindlyghost4829
@@freindlyghost4829 I ain't drinking a beer with you you can't even formulate a coherent sentence. You use improper grammar. Nothing you say has any validty because it's immediately discredited by the simple fact you can't even do something as basic as speak.
@@freindlyghost4829Isn’t that 1+1 and not 1x1? Where is the multiplication in your beer ”story”?
yeah pretty much, dude is insane
I’m so tired of ignorant people pretending they know more
This is exactly how Qanon started
Said all the stupid people.
@@nielslarsen1693Are you really trying to defend not knowing the difference between multiplication and addition?
@@colebyrnes7889 if you think Terrence says anything but nonsense you dont understand multiplication or addition
Well saying "that's how I invented dltangental math" ego screams validation bc we all know to truly learn and create it's a group affair so who are his teachers and collaborators bc this screams pretentious
Terrence is living proof of why we shouldnt give celebrities and actors a voice about ANY important subject. Climate change, other social issues, and math included.
If celebrities are speaking to accepted science and data driven research then have at it. Climate change and evolution are data driven accepted science with irrefutable evidence backing them.
But when a celebrity starts saying they’re smarter than the scientists then yammer on about things that a 2nd grader can debunk, it’s time to take the mic away.
1X1= 2… what a complete imbecile.
But you don't believe the scientists on any of that shit either, you prefer to listen to *checks notes* an adulterous reality television show host turned convicted felon
No, he's proof that we shouldn't give Terrence Howard any credence. You can't make broad generalizations based on specific instances.
There are intelligent artists and actors. It's actually ignorant to suggest we ignore a person's commentary and opinions on important issues simply because they are entertainers. 🤦♀️
@@LoneRanger-et7gq I guess you are counting Gretta Thunberg in the valid category? With the exception of maybe Reagen name the last celebrity that did anything of value outside of hollywood....*crickets*
I hope airplanes don't find out that the math that keeps them in the sky has been wrong this whole time!
“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” This quote is being proven to be true as we speak
We are all circumstantial idiots, just different subjects....different moments
1x1=2 terrence is a genius. Please read his books
I’m just curious how he thinks it’s 2, ofc everyone is taught 1x1 is 1 but why does he state otherwise ?
He’s a genius holding 97 patents. Take a harder look.
This what ppl used to call Tesla and other genius for challenging conventional science at that time until they proved everyone wrong remember when ppl thought the world was flat and you would fall of the edge of you to too far west ? Then colon did and discovered a new continent everything is relative my brother don’t be a hater
Terence is clearly mentally I at this point. And as a Black mathematician and physicist and educator it’s sad to see someone this wrong. His biggest issue is doesn’t know what multiplication means so HIS fundamentals are wrong.
Terrence isn't wrong and logically 1x1 could only equal 2. The only way it dosen't. Is that you have to change the language and definitions of Multiplication and Times. Times is plural not singular. Multiplication meaning to multiply. The "X" in the equation means to multiply. It doesn't mean anything else. So, either 1x1=2 or 5x5=5. Which is it? Both logically can't be true.
Bro, multiplication was invented as a way to shorten addition. So instead of saying 1+1+1+1+1=5 multiplication was created to shorten that to 1x5=5 (you have 1, 5 times) so 1x1=1 (you have 1, only once)
@@ricardosmith5753 exactly. Terence seems to not know or understand this.
@@aawiggins314159 It's not a matter of understanding. It's a matter honesty and language used to describe the function of calculations. 1x1 should be removed from the table. Otherwise is a lie. You could say "1" is a representation of a whole number that can't be divided or multiplied by itself. Once you call it multiplication or say times, plural and not time, singular. You just lied and then you could only say it equals 2.
@@andreroy8141 This is mathematics not a court of law. “Honesty” is not the point. Multiplication as we’re discussing is a definition. And understanding is the ONLY point. Terence (and those like him in their armchair zealotry) do not understand what multiplication means within the context of mathematics a dm it’s very precise about what Al the terms are referring to and their relationship to one another. There’s nothing false about 1 X 1 = 1. This is a TECHNICAL expression and you can’t simply come in and try to redefine things arbitrarily. And you wouldn’t do this in any other field as well.
Society is f’d when a fair number of people can’t call out obvious uneducated drivel.
Explain how tangential flight works then please break it down for me.
@@rexenoshi I haven't done a deep dive on the tangential flight. I didn't even know what it was when you wrote it. After looking it up, it looks like 6 hexagons with propellers on the inside attached together. What can this accomplish that is of any tangible value? Does it use lower levels or energy to fly? Has it increased the speed of flight? Has it lowered material costs for flying vehicles?No, no, & no. This is no scientific or engineering value unless it accomplishes something new or creates new scientific knowledge. Don't see how this toy does any one of those things. Also why do you think Terrence Howard lied about having a phd in chemical engineering from SCSU? When you figure that out, then maybe you'll be better at spotting grifters in the future.
@@Kami84 last time I checked Isaac Newton didn’t have a phd yet I bet your dumbass still believes in gravity. Just because he isn’t explaining how his mind works to make it so you understand it doesn’t mean he isn’t a genius. Infact the bulk of people who are, are treated just like how Terrance Howard is being treated. Seen as Crazy people or mad men until our understanding catches up. But aye I’m sure your explanation of hexagon 6 propeller toy explanation of how the movement and the flight works will go down in history.
@@rexenoshi Tangential flight is a buzzword with no meaning to it.
@@rexenoshi just out of curiosity, who are you voting for this November? If at all.
My guy, if 1 person got 1 cake, then 1x1 =1. I don't see the contradiction at all with 1x1=1
What happens when you pour water on a gremlin. Does it multiply itself?
And, can you pour water in thin air and get a gremlin? No
Terrence is saying the word multiply should mean when you start with a value greater than 0 and enlarge it.
But, words don't govern how numbers work.
Exactly...1×1=1....its the same as saying it...wuts 1 ...1 time...its 1 lol
@tae2910 yes, 1 TIMES 1 = 1.
But what happens when you get a gremlin wet? It multiplies into 9 more gremlins. So, 1 MULTIPLIED 9 times equals 10. Or 1 DIVIDED 9 times equals 10?
It's a grammar issue. This is why we don't use grammar to do math. Words can mean multiple things where a number is always the same.
Edit: The idea Is that the word multiply is like the word "clone". You can't clone nothing, so you need something to clone/multiply.
It's basically compounding interest. We already have formulas for this. Either way someone wants to use the word multiply, we already have a way to use it.
Terrence howard is unaware of this.
Also, TIMES is just an addition function.
@@DrSpoculusSomeone should let him know before he makes an ass out of himself. 😂
Damn you need one of dem professionals @@DrSpoculus
He's actually insane. That's it
If he wasn't so fortunate to become rich as an actor, he would be that guy talking gibberish on the street corner instead of on podcasts spewing nonsense.
Nooooo, you’re sane!!!! That’s the problem here…. It’s 2024, get crazy or get left buddy….
lol this is almost reality lol
Certified
@@endxofxeternityever since IronMan 2 pre-production
That means if I have 1 dollar, I actually have 2 dollars! Holly Shit, I just found infinite money glitch!
😂
Unfortunately his math doesn't work for me.
I tried multiples 1£ but I was always ending up with what I started
I wish for once he could demonstrate his stupid beliefs. Not just claiming it
It’s the “never be broke”hack!
If you have two dollars does that mean you really have 4?
@@jamesringness3702 Yes ì believe it scales
It's hilarious that he says it with such confidence 😂😂😂
@@Tommy81.519 … because he knows the work of Sean M. Carroll , you don’t
He’s acting like me on LSD. The only difference is I eventually sober up
His face of confidence in the beginning with the pause of silence got me weak 😂
Lmao
He’s totally wrong! He is equating mathematics multiplying with increasing amounts. Multiplication does NOT increase any numbers. It is saying, “This number that number of times is this total number.” There is NO NUMBER that is made larger when you multiply two numbers. The total number you get, using positive whole numbers, is always going to be larger than the first number, UNLESS YOU ARE MULTIPLYING BY ONE because it is saying that there is only 1 of that first number. Multiply in math does not mean a number gets larger. It means you are counting groups! *Does Terrence Howard x 1 = 2? NO! But Terrence Howard says it DOES! Terrence show me where the other Terrence is???*
*WHERE IS TERRANCE TIMES TERRANCE???*
I get the logic whether it's right or wrong. So lets say you have 1 apple and times it by zero, you would still have that 1 apple... right? 0 x nothing would = 0, but as soon as you say 1 apple, it exists, and you have something regardless of what you times it by so 0 x 1 = 1 because the apple exists. It sounds weird but i can see how someone might come to that conclusion. So, 0 = nothing, 1 = something but the real kicker is how can you have something from nothing??? Therefor something had to already exist 😁
Commutative property. value × multiplicand = product. Truth-functional propositional logic.
Algebra, etc etc
Calculus, etc etc
Is Terrence a trangender vaccination salesman?
@@republicofcasualsNah, man. An apple times zero is zero. That is to say, if you have one set of zero apples, you have zero apples. Or if you have zero sets of one apple, likewise. That's what is being communicated in 1x0=0.
My man just turned math into a conspiracy theory....
Nobody has the guts to call him out and ridicule him to his face.
Yeah we feel kinda sorry for him 😅
Neil deGrasse Tyson did! Look up his peer review. It is magnificent and be did it in a gentlemanly and scholarly way 😂😂
This is reminding me of 2+2 =5 in george orwell's 1984
To multiply means to increase. That's his argument. So, by definition, to add more to one CANNOT be one. It's actually a good argument.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
To multiply means to increase. By definition, to increase 1 by 1 it must be 2.
@@crushinnihilism it's actually not a good argument and it's just verbal slight of hand. In mathematics multiply doesn't mean icrease by that's what addition is. If you increase 5 by 5 that's 10. Multiplication signifies how many sets of that number there are. If you have 5 x 5 for example that means 5 sets of 5 added together which gives you 25. That's why we call it "times" we're saying how much you get when you count 5, 5 times
When you reach celebrity status, there will be some percentage of smooth brained individuals that just believe any nonsense you say.
Bingo
Yeah but "celebrity" is doing some heavy lifting. The only reason you know this dude is because of the unhinged nonsense he's saying. He's at best a D list celeb. If this was Taylor Swift or Trump sure I'd get it but this dude?
@BlueLightningSky He may be less recognized by younger generations. I remember him from Iron Man and Hustle & Flow. He's D list now, and barely more than D list then. But he's recognizable enough that the uneducated will believe him and point to his celebrity status as if he's credentialed to speak with authority on anything.
Loke you in school?
@Alittude In English please.
Calculator works fine, you're crazy. Question answered.
This is a man who took a high dive in a low well.
First heard this in the Hateful Eight! 👌🏿
you jumped in a gas tank witcha butt cheeks on fire 🔥
go drink from the gas ⛽️ pump and light a cigarette 🚬
This is actually genius, he's getting the entire country to talk about him over being confidently wrong about the most basic thing imaginable
Neil just clapped Terrence publicly which eases my soul
Seeing people like Terrence Howard really makes me value my intelligence. Thank goodness, my parents got together over a mutual respect for each other's minds. The older I get, the more understand how much of an avantage it is to have a rational and reliable mind.
I like to imagine terrence is doing the biggest drawn out troll humanity has ever seen
about to be!!
Best case scenario
I keep wondering if he's trying to out do joaquin phoenix
@@crai6m4ckwas thinking the same thing. But then again he has been off the rails since Iron Man many years ago…which is why they released him.
don't give him an out.
Never forget this is the same guy that thought he should be paid an equal amount as the main star Robert Downey Jr, for playing a supporting character 😂. They were wise to ditch his stupid a$$ and get Don Cheadle.
If you don't speak up who will
@@comment5398what you speak has to make some sense
@@9ine-fd6zc ok bot
@@comment5398 i stand by my first statement🤚
@@9ine-fd6zc ok bot
Terrence really selling that crazy math jesus persona, absolutely underrated actor
He’s a troll that’s reminding people he still exists in the dumbest way possible
Yeah dude you are smarter than every mathematician that ever lived and everyone who abides to basic multiplication. Freaking mastermind.
If 1*1 = 2 then what is 1*2 equal to?
@@n4jemnik136 well if 1*1=2 you can divide both sides by 1 and get 1=2, meaning 1*2 would be 2*2 so 4. Obviously 1 does not equal 2
the sad thing is fanboys believe this trash
@@n4jemnik136depends, is multiplication being confused for addition? Because that’s what it looks like lol
It's just a simple application to explain METAPHYSICS and not just physics. His application explains occult principles which is hard to put in a mathematical written expression. The tree of life
Terrance, we have gone to space using the current math system. Please fly a ship with yours
Tbf we've also been to space with calcs based on Newtonian physics which have since been replaced with better models.
Not really the best measuring stick for math
@@sunwukong32 If he can make a shuttle fly with his math, I will believe him.
@@sunwukong32 Firstly, you're wrong. Newtonian physics haven't been "replaced", they've been suplemented in extreme areas (atom scale and cosmic scale). Secondly, this man is questioning the basic building blocks of the fucking universe and everything we've ever built, not high level theories.
@@cpthrki5852 firstly, I didn't say anything about Terrance Howard. I said using successful space travel as a measuring stick for accurate math is problematic. If you want to challenge that notion, you'll have to do it without appealing to the incredulity of a claim I never even made.
Secondly, in the context of the topic I was discussing, Newtonian physics have been replaced with better models. The first step in space travel is overcoming gravity. Do we still follow the Newtonian view of gravity? No. Do we still use the same equations based on the old model? No. They have been replaced.
@@sunwukong32 it's not problematic because basic operation like multiplication are the building block of any models. Terrence or the guy commenting aren't commenting on high level models.
Terrance Howard is not crazy and the calculator is not broke. He just doesn’t understand the fundamentals of mathematical philosophy and that has nothing to do with his intelligence. He a very intelligent person, and like lots of intelligent people he is mostly concerned with his ego. Theoretical science is a continuum and his quest is to be singular and smarter that everyone else greatly impedes his ability to understand these things. He’s unconcerned with contributing to human understanding of reality he’s try to exalt himself above everyone else for his own purposes.
Nah, he crazy 😂
I miss the time when crazy people were treated like crazy people.
Dude went nuts when Don Cheadle became war machine
Whats crazy is i forgot he was even in iron man one lol i legit for some reason always had it in my head that don cheadle was always war machine, he jus fits the role i guess but now that i remember terrance being war machine he also gave a great performance. Dont know how i forgot about that completely lol
1 x 1 war machines = Don Cheadle
Shia labeouf'd
Thats the truth.
That’s exactly my theory
The moment he was dropped from iron man 2 his brain broke
You're not crazy Howard
You're BATSHIT FUCKING INSANE!!!!
And the calculator is correct
@@matthewdaisley9996 ever heard the saying even a broken clock shows right time twice a day?
@@VishalKjha yes this guys, less correct than that
@@VishalKjha1*1 times a day
@@ooze5752 hah. That was funny.
Dude forgot, he's no longer on stage😂
With that level of math knowledge, I wonder how he dresses himself.
In my relationship 1x1 ended up being 3 😂 Me, her and our little lad
Mines (currently still) is at 1x2=12 🙂
His point exactly.. It's a universal number
I think that’s what he’s saying , how could it ever be one when your multiplying it? 🤷♂️🤯🤦♂️
Now that is the true science of man 🔥
That's 1 + 1 = 3 😁 😂
Bad math. That's why Hustle and Flow made $23.5 million, but he only got paid $12,000.
yeah thats not the reason
@@ailuosi7241 Lol. I know....but still.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
he only got paid 12k for that movie??? woooooooow, no way i dont believe that, he KILLED in that role
yooooo this is THE TOP COMMENT
The ironman thing really touched a nerve on this man.
Someone switched the + and the x symbol on his calculator 😂
I need his weed mayne number cause he fried
Yall ain't gon get it til 50 years from now😂
Im him lol
on 🔥 mane
Won ate hunnit to fo fo selm five ate five. I believe that's the number
@@alexcollins3086 tre won sick fih nan oh to. free raps.
5 x 1= the # of times he's been arrested for assaulting women. And everything coming out of Terrance Howard's mouth should be multiplied by B.S. to the infinite power.😂
So he's been arrested 10 times? Whose math are you using here?
@@PeteC62 are you terrance howard? 5x1. Google it.
Props on inventing tangential flight Terrance. I do it everyday. So fun.
*”I invented tangential flight…”*
proceeds to not put anything at all into actual flight
That Oscar from hustle and flow broke his brain
He didn't get an Oscar. He was nominated for it, but didn't win it.
*nomination. He didn't win. Philip Seymour Hoffman won for Capote that year
Childhood trauma, and cocaine, broke his brain.
He’s making good comedy I can’t deny
Is it?
Is this the most well known example of the Dunning Kruger effect we have alive today?
I’ve yet to see anyone just tell Terrance flat out you’re wrong instead of dancing around it
“That’s how I invented tangential flight”
*proceeds to not invent anything*
Lol, you don’t know about all his patents?
@@wolfmand9641tell us you don’t understand patents without saying it. 😂
@@PremiumPIus a government authority or license conferring a right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention.
"he took out a patent for an improved steam hammer"
Do you even understand why patents are important?
@@wolfmand9641 he has zero patens of value and some design patents that's not any invention at all and a couple of real patents that have no use case and are just impractical solutions solving no problem or issue at all.
@@wolfmand9641his parents are worth shit and should be dismissed after ANY analysis, because you can’t patent anything like this, I mean those shapes he „invented” can count as art, and art can’t be patented… so 😂😂😂😂😂
Love Terrance’s math clips. Reading the comments really does show how stupid a lot of people are.
At first I thought you were serious. Terrence does need a psychiatric intervention.
@@xaviermagnate
Yes he does. I meant that some comments agree with him.
@@danbrown3103 terrence is pretending ... he doesnt know ... in real world math works ok, but if you go to quantum world 1 * 1 = 11 ... because string can vibrate in 11 different dimensions ... 1 action 1 string 11 different outcomes ... math even support this ... BUT the way he is explaining is obvious that he read something, doesnt graps the idea and now he is trying to replicate it ... butchering it completely
@@danbrown3103 just to be clear 1 * 1 = 11 that i explained is oversimplified to the maximum level because math behind this is complex as hell
@@kacmed what
Having one object present is 1. Having two objects present is 2. You cannot multiply those to objects. What you can multiply is the number of people who have that ONE object, or two of those objects, etc. So you end up with the number of those objects. Are present. It is a operation that deals with a number of sets that you have. Not an operation that increase ANYTHING. It is only figuring out what you already have. NOTHING IS INCREASING IN THIS OPERATION. Multiply, as in increasing the amount of something that you have IS ACTUALLY ADDITION. ADDITION increases the amount, where as MULTIPLICATION allows you to figure out how many of those things, or that amount, is ALREADY THERE.
“People said I’m crazy”. No Terrence, people are saying you’re crazy
For all of you defending this guy, if what he is saying is right and the math we are using is wrong, there would be no:
Buildings
Bridges
Computers
Phones
Eye glasses
Cars....
All of human inventions and technology are science based, and math is the language of science.
Let that sink in.
or maybe we’d have better of all those things
Not necessarily if we're all using the same calculations it wouldn't matter think about it as long as we both get the answer 4 it didn't matter how we got to 4 1+1+1+1=4 2+2=4 3+1=3 etc so if they all had the same scale it wouldn't affect the outcome. It's different when you think of it from the perspective of imagining the zeroeth dimension but it was a conceptual thought experiment thing that would not function so IDK it's he crazy I mean we been lied to about a lot this would just be 1 more lie IDK WTF to believe anymore man who knows.
OR
We could have had flying cars decades ago
No he’s not saying the current math that exists doesn’t function in a way that is useful.
Math is the language of the universe, so yea, you can tell he didn’t finish school
I would've just called him flat out crazy 😂
This is why education is important..
The other twp guys arent even equipped to argue back so instead of nipping the convo they let Terrence spew insanity into mass media LOL
The fact that no one is just saying he's out of his mind is a huge critique on the education in America or how little people care about the integrity of Terrence...
This makes me realize why he’s been labeled “difficult to work with”. This man’s been holding on to the idea that he’s been right about 1x1=2 since the third grade. He’s be a nightmare to argue with about anything.
Its hard out here for a pimp
I genuinely thought that the amount of people that Re THIS STUPID wasn't enough for this guy to get any meaningful support.
I was wrong. People are calling him a genius.
I should have been a fraudster 😂
It’s hard out here for a simp
Do not, I repeat, do not allow terrace Howard to build your planes 😂😂
The guy claims he was awake inside his mother's womb, but conveniently forgets he was asleep during 2nd grade math class.
Bro found a loop equation and thought the math was wrong 💀
I think every time Terrence used a calculator, he pressed the + thinking that it's the x button.
“They programmed that lie in the calculator!”
As a programmer, if there is one thing computers are good at, it’s manipulating numbers very fast. It’s not just with arithmetic either. Whether someone is using a calculator, watching a RUclips, browsing Facebook, or literally anything else on a computer, it is ultimately manipulating 1’s and 0’s extremely fast.
So yeah, maybe this guy is just dumb and is talking about a field he has no expertise in and claiming to be an authoritative figure in that field, like a charlatan. Please stick to acting. You’re clearly good at it.
Terrance simply created a new math where the standard unit of counting is 1.4142. And in this new math, this number is called 'one.'
The function is "f(x) = x(x)" if x=1 then "f(1) = 1(1)". Multiplication is a contraction of a factor. If I scale something from 1 along a ratio of 1:1, then you get 1 because you did not change it at all. If I have 1 apple per set (1/1) and I have 1 set of apples, then I have 1 apple. You are not comparing 2 things. You are scaling 1 thing by a factor of the second value. If I have 2 sets where the set is 1 apple per set, then I have 2(1/1) = 2/2=1.
In simple terms:
Multiplication = Reaction
Don't confuse it with addition. That is why we have both addition & multiplication in math😎
Thanks you! Louder for the people in the back!
The irony that the only people who would actually understand what you wrote or want to spend the time to understand it already know that 1x1=2.
@@jackinzbox.wait what? If you have 1 group of 1 apples you have 2 apples?
@@heyalun just realized I made that typo lmao. I meant 1x1=1 but I guess my brain was so focused on 1x1=2 that that’s what I wrote. Not gonna fix it tho since it’s pretty funny.
For those of you who don't know, mathematicians settled this in the 1800s.
Long story short, the real numbers (i.e , all the numbers we commonly use) are something called a field. A field is a mathematical object that is the basis for a lot of the math we use (e.g. addition, multiplication, division, calculus, etc.)
Every field must have something called an "identity element" for multiplication. The identity element for multiplication (call the identity element i) is a number such that
i × x = x for any number x
For the real numbers, we define 1 as the identity element for the real numbers. So if we let x =1, we see that 1×1 =1
So Terrence is wrong. He is wrong because BY DEFINITION 1 x 1 = 1.
Kudos if you read this. 😁
Is an identity means 1?
I don’t think so.
And what if our identity element is 2 or anything else? In such case the above demonstration will collapse.
For my part we should pay attention to what Terrence is raising.
@abdoulkadermoussasiddo1946 There is a little bit more to the explanation I gave. The real numbers are a specific kind a field called an ordered field. Essentially, this means that all the numbers have a specifix order (i.e. -2 < 3 , pi < 4, etc). By definition, 1 is the multiplicative identity for the real numbers and 2 defined as 1+1. We can define other numbers in other ways as well. For example 3 is just 2 +1 where 2 is defined from before. 4 is just 3+1, etc.
One thing you might notice is that we are kind of "building" the set of real numbers. We started with the idea of a field with a mulitplicative identity and then we defined the numbers 2, 3, 4, and so on.
Without adding too much complexity, every field must have two operations with two identities for those operations. For the real numbers, the two operators are multiplication and addition.
1 is defined as the multiplicative identity (i.e. 1×x = x for any number x).
0 is defined as the additive identity
(I.e. x+0 = x for any number x)
There is more to this. All members of a field (other than the additive inverse) must have a multiplictive inverse. Furthermore, every memver ofna field must have an additive inverse. This gives us negative numbers and fractions. Something called the axiom of completeness gives us all the other numbers. I know this is a lot, but the point is that all of these ideas are formalized.
How is the multiplication of 1 with 0 explained using this field theory?
@MrOod67
We define multiplication as:
a×b = a added to itself b times.
For example, 2×3 = 2+2+2 =6
In the case of 0×1, you have 0 added 1 time (i.e. just zero). So it is just zero.
@@fireburnseverything I was actually asking specifically regarding the field theory you mentioned and the identity element, but having re-read your original post I see now I misread the equation: I read it as i * x = i, which obviously isn't correct in most cases.
This guy popped up on my radar about 2 weeks ago. I knew him as the actor but never knew he was absolutely bat shit crazy.
I’m sure won’t live in a building structurally designed by this guy.🤦🏻
I flipping LOVE this so much. It brings all the crazies to the surface, all the people who refuse to speak but think like this. This is exactly the same as the bear in the forest scenario!!! LOL!!!
When I was in grade school, I remember observing the sheer idiocy of most of my my peers. Only a few of us would "get" lessons and do "well." I imagine most classrooms are like this in inner city "unprivileged" schools (as those I attended). Those "slower" kids are now all grown up and in society.
@@roqbar8764 Lol something about that does sound quite familiar. These are definitely the people who have strong opinions, but absolutely no argument under critique. Have you met gen z? I'm gonna say without a doubt, direct correlation between behavioural trends, society in general, and the advent of social media. I did very poorly in school because I had no one to model success to me or even the baseline standard of participating, rather the opposite our family was about non-participation and reliance, it took time and hard work to re-organize behavioural patterns after I grew up and moved out of home after school. I know people aren't equal when it comes to processing power lol, but that's been hamstrung in this generation by a bottleneck, they're completely brainwashed and dependent on 10 second shorts. Dependant on an ideology that pervades everything, and to them overcomes all rationality. It feels very similar to what i'm seeing in the comments everywhere about the Terrence Howard interview, It's worrying. Part of me wonders if it's not just something, some department somewhere is using to gauge public opinion, like a litmus test to see how malleable the public is, or at least on facebook and social media lol.
@@davidhardy3074 Interesting (especially your last sentence). Thank you for your thoughtful insight. I agree, though contradicting myself, that "social" media is affecting behavioral trends and society. This comment section is a glimpse to those effects.
@@roqbar8764 I fully agree with you mate, it was like that at school for me too. For me, i'm not a team player never have been. Do poorly on teams, and great by myself.
if you see me in a fight wit a bear, dont help me, help the bear
Problem here is that multiplication is not defined correctly. Many define it repeated addition of a number to itself. That's the problem.
When it comes to positive integers it really is repeated addition. Even with more than one factor it can be taken two factors at a time and rewritten as simple addition, simplifying as you go.
In this case 1x1 is clearly 1. Claiming 1x1 = 2 is clearly bonkers. You have one quantity of one value, and the value is 1. The sum of that single value of 1, is 1.
Then again, terrence once told rolling stone that we are told the square root of 2 is 2... which of course we are not told that and it isn't that. He just doesn't understand at all.
Great point
In what way is it a problem?
@Nyxantos-rm2zx you know his material doesnt come from him.. he knows what he is talking about he jus has different views.. but hey i bet you still think neil degrasse tyson knows what he is talking about or professor cuckoo😉
Even by that definition, the number 1 repeated once still equals 1 😅
When your hypothesis is so strong you take it on podcasts hosted by non scientists.
Yo we can't define biological genders and now this, what fucking time line am I in
Your 100% crazy Terrence 😆
He is the embodiment of the exact opposite of "why say lot word when few word do trick?"