@@colepeterson6541 Perhaps more should be done to help people like Dylan, in order to prevent them from getting wrapped up in their own loneliness and warped fantasies. I say perhaps, because sometimes it feels like a lottery system, where the powers that be choose to help the people that they consider worth helping. On the other hand, there are people like Dylan who do receive the necessary preventative treatment, but then they find themselves falling into some sort of relapse, then they are considered 'beyond any hope of redemption' (unless it happens to come in the shape of two bullets through the left side of the chest cavity, shortly followed by a third through the top half of the cranial appendage). Either way, it's a strange and messed up world we all live in.
Wow, this man is really making me sound like a lunatic and convincing the jury that I did this because I can't control myself. *Let me slide across this table and make him stop talking*
@@daynechastant that is also true but I am talking like if he was not reactive to what the lawyer said I think he would have gone free even though the evidence was there there was not much they could do just try to convince them a dude killed so many people for just one which is very hard only with some social network evidence. His lawyer got him almost free and that shows how corrupt and bad the law system is...
Philip Winchester is a very underrated actor. He was one of the best parts of Strike Back, and he did a fantastic job on this show as well. He deserves to be a part of another successful show!
Unfortunately none of us have a perfect life. We fake it through social media and basically saying "look at me and my life that I had." We are human. Even if you think someone has the "perfect life," then you are wrong, because that person feels like life isn't great for them.
@@nikkimiddlekillsday5161 Phillip watched the dark knight which made him win this case; he compared Dylan to the joker’s just wanna watch the world burn.
Some of us make do with fantasy lives and for some of us, they’re enough to give us some hope for a better future. Even just the simple pleasures that we enjoy are worth the crappy lives we probably enjoy in our own ways.
@@eringsgrace3560 poor girl dies in a fire that was started by arsons paid by building owner. They locked all but one exit door so most people couldn't get out. It was an episode that stated with him learning about the fire on Chicago pd and continued on Chicago fire. Really sad episode. The trial where AL is crying is the arsonist. Some really good acting on both shows.
@@connierichards9121 No you are wrong. The building owner didn't have anything to do with it. It started on Chicago Fire and then continued on Chicago PD then was finished on this show, Chicago Justice. The young man on trial set the fire because he was rejected by a girl. There were a bunch of young people living in a warehouse and she was one of them. He put wedges under the door so that they couldn't get it open to get out. The Lexi Olinsky that died was the daughter of one of the Detectives.
@@amandabilger2235 may have got shows backward but the father of Lexi was Al who was a detective on Chicago Pd. She died in season 4 and he died in Season 6.
I think it was just set to bring the Stone name back, given the references to Ben Stone, not complaining I love both franchises but kind of wish there was more.
Conozco a todos los personajes de Chicago PD desde que hace ocho años. empecé a ver... LEY Y ORDEN. Trabajaban. cuando había casos en Chicago y compartían los casos.
Funny thing is, he would rather be seen as an insane maniac that wanted to kill instead of a lonely, sad, angry incel who was jealous of how much fun everyone is having 😂😂😂
Well yeah because it's the same character from SVU And he could have worked with Chicago PD And when they did another cross over event between pd and svu He could have shown up to help his old friends
Because he was alone he chose to act in violence that took the lives of innocent people. He used a woman's rejection as an excuse. But the one factor is choice he wasn't mentally ill he wasn't crazy he chose to kill not 1 person but many who are part of this 1 person's life. Evil doesn't stop it destroys not one but many.
Yeah I know and I found out that the girl who rejected him wanted to be interviewed by Burgess and Lindsay in an episode and she survived but sadly she’s burned up pretty badly and she could spend the following 6-12 months in the burn unit thanks to him, he didn’t kill her but most of her friends who had nothing to do with it had to pay the price sadly😢
His behaviour does seem to suggest psychopathy or some similar behavioural disorder. Right down to the resentment that he'd been caught and that this... *person* was now 'defaming' him before the jury by claiming that he is a bad person. Because, in his mind, he was, is and always will be a victim of other people.
@terminator3768 they're similar in concept but chicago can easily put a different spin on it. The Chicago franchise has very successfully made its own name apart from the Law and Order franchise. That's part of why we haven't unfortunately seen a crossover between SVU and PD in almost a decade.
@@dakotad70 the shows also dont deal with the kinda criminals that would justify traveling between the 2 cities very often arsonists, drug dealers, gangs, sex offenders etc, those tend to be more local
Something ludicrous like 39 life sentences with a minimum of 50 years for each count before he can apply for parole (yes, that means 1,950 years before he can apply for parole) plus an extra 30 for the arson. They'll probably also impose fines for court costs and reparations that will mean everything he owns will need to be sold to cover it (and won't).
A child not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth. Sad the child is a grown ass teenager who was rejected, evil cause he was willing to kill kids, and pathetic it was all for nothing.
@@fortminor85 no, but it is a good example. He and his mother were shunned by their village when he was a child. When he became a warlord, he destroyed his old village and killed everyone there save for one man who was the sole individual to show him kindness in life.
Elias Koteas, part of the jury, said very little but emoted very much. A working actor who isn't an A or B lister but a great character actor who sometimes steals scenes meant for the others. Bravo. 🎉
@@georgeeast5502 I disagree I think all the sins can be beneficial to society if they are all kept under restraint and moderation. Why Sloth as well? Look around you we create a tons of good product so that we can do less work and put in less effort..one good example car.
And this right here is why I don’t trust trail by jury. (Don’t get me wrong he’s guilty as sin) The lawyer triggered a response that turned the jury against him the second he did that the evidence didn’t matter anymore to them
But only a guilty person would have such a visceral response. Trial by jury isn’t 100% for sure because we’re all human and make descisions off emotions too, however between the evidence and that response he gave himself away lol. The job of lawyers is to take the evidence and spin it in their favor, as it is not always a person writes out their intention and reasoning so the court gets the exact “why”. But when you start banging at the table then try to attack the DA at trial when he’s only talking about a “hypothetical why” . . . You out yourself lol. If I were the one being charged and I know I didn’t do it then I would A. Look confused and probably be mad that I’m on trial for something I didn’t do but B. I damn sure wouldn’t get increasingly mad to a point of attacking in open court when the other side is pulling a hypothetical reasoning. Only someone who is mad about the truth getting exposed has that reaction. Just like when a person says I swear I’m not lying and such, usually they’re lying lol and are saying that in attempt to get someone to believe them. And lastly both Lawyers ask tons of questions when picking the jury and have strikes they can use to cut the other sides pick. So the jury (decision makers) is chosen by the people trying to win. If it’s a case about a cop who killed an unarmed man you can bet your tail the prosecution is going to strike or dismiss anyone who dislikes cops, dislikes the law, etc. while the defense is going to want jurors who are pro law enforcement, have law enforcement family members etc. Jurors get struck for cause depending on what the case is about and that’s honestly the fairest way. It’s not in 1 persons hand, it’s not just the prosecution or defense picking the jury and it’s not just the next 15 people that answer jury call is automatically the jury. The process makes it super fair, but still since we are all human that rely on emotions it will never be a fool proof thing. People can also lie and a million other things, but the way jury’s are chosen these days is the fairest.
@@carynwaters9153 really and how many mentally ill people are sent to jail cause they have an burst in court? the out burst isnt the issue its the fact that the proscuter coused it on purpouse he pushed his buttions
@@seanbraley2772 as far as i understand jury trials, there is a point, if the lawyer crisses a line, there is typically a retrial with a new jury as the original jury was affected not by facts. Though i am not a lawyer and only heard what some lawyers said when critiquing tv / movie trials that are fiction. Same thing with evidence, you typically dont bring random new evidence, it is typically collected during discovery phase and then used in the trial. But most of the details flew over my head and i might totally wrong here.
@@carynwaters9153 Actually, if you look at how people react when they've been detained by police and accused of a crime, innocent people tend to be the ones who get upset and have a visceral reaction. It's guilty people who tend to react calmly because they've already mentally prepared for the accusation.
@@ObsidianKnight90 not always. I’ve seen people who actual acted like this bloke because they believe it ‘was their right’ to kill that person, that it was always someone else’s fault. Their dads hit them, their mums didn’t love them enough. For people like this, they’ll respond like him. One bloke I know, son of a family friend, he had to restrained as he was violent while expressing his innocence. He was caught beating the kid up, and everything was caught in detail, but according to him and his family he is innocent, didn’t flip out and attack a random person.
This was part of Chicago justice however because of the story it crossed over with Chicago fire where it started, and pd when they found proof of arrison then ended with justice cause of the legal process. Sadly Chicago justice was one season I great on however only one
@@preciousotoakhia9789 Stone was Chicago PD. The episode where Burgess and Roman got shot at. It ended Roman's career as a cop. Stone prosecuted the kid that did it.
Daniella Melnick was convinced by Jack McCoy in New York to testify against her client and she almost got murdered. I could easily imagine she re-locates to Chicago, dominates the legal scene as an incredible lawyer and becomes a judge.
OMG, I didn’t realize that was his daughter too, he did right thing not to attack the killer, it’s not worthit. 😢😢😢😢😢, man jsut imagine loosing your wife and kid mannnn. Regardless of how old they get, age is just a number they still your son or daughter.
2:55 "Bits and bites and logarithms" :p So how many people have to not know the difference between algorithm and logarithm for this to be the final edit? My guess is that the writer doesn't know, and the actor just read out whatever they were told to, whether they know it or not.
and people find it strange that some people kinda respect hitmen . they get paid to do the job, they dont make a scene and kill just their target. they dont just put a bomb in a family car or destroy the whole restaurant.
Very noble. In Italy mafia hit men routinely kill children and women of law officials. In Mexico cartel hit men are known to wipe out whole families. South East Asia they do the same, kill the children including babies so that no one can avenge the killings. It's in movies that they depicted as methodical and with 'rules'. The rules are that there are no rules.
A hitman is hired to kill one target. Killing anything other than that target (aside from any security that compromises their mission), such as innocent people, takes the hitman label off. And it sticks on the Killer one
Lawyers can, witnesses are directed to respond directly to and can only answer questions from the attorneys and the judge. Amber Heard got caught several times trying to talk directly to the jury, and got reprimanded for it repeatedly.
2 things i didnt know: That Peter was Ben Stone's son, also that Phillip Winchester was Scott Tracy from Thunderbirds( the slightly disappointing 2004 movie)
Closing arguments are pretty loosely governed. The defence attorney was essentially slandering the ADA all the way through so he could hardly complain about the ADA appealing to emotion in his summation of the evidence.
Watch more iconic moments from your favourite Police Dramas at PD TV!
Subscribe to PD TV here - ruclips.net/channel/UCcfJ9wYielnEqrZWFNsNFBAfeatured
He doesn’t care about the innocent dead, they’re nothing to him. He wanted her to suffer and they were just there.
Exactly
That’s why I strongly dislike murders with zero regret for their crimes
@@blackcherry941 It's because they're evil, they don't care.
What a Monster, so wraped up in his own little world, makes me sick.
@@colepeterson6541 Perhaps more should be done to help people like Dylan, in order to prevent them from getting wrapped up in their own loneliness and warped fantasies. I say perhaps, because sometimes it feels like a lottery system, where the powers that be choose to help the people that they consider worth helping. On the other hand, there are people like Dylan who do receive the necessary preventative treatment, but then they find themselves falling into some sort of relapse, then they are considered 'beyond any hope of redemption' (unless it happens to come in the shape of two bullets through the left side of the chest cavity, shortly followed by a third through the top half of the cranial appendage).
Either way, it's a strange and messed up world we all live in.
He’s like joker
Wow, this man is really making me sound like a lunatic and convincing the jury that I did this because I can't control myself. *Let me slide across this table and make him stop talking*
The sad part of the "justice" is that if he compose himself and hold off those feelings he would have probably walked free.
@@FriedSheep69 If he could have composed himself and held off those feelings, maybe he wouldn't have burned those people alive...
@@daynechastant that is also true but I am talking like if he was not reactive to what the lawyer said I think he would have gone free even though the evidence was there there was not much they could do just try to convince them a dude killed so many people for just one which is very hard only with some social network evidence. His lawyer got him almost free and that shows how corrupt and bad the law system is...
Nailed it...😱
lol thats a good idea!
Philip Winchester is a very underrated actor. He was one of the best parts of Strike Back, and he did a fantastic job on this show as well. He deserves to be a part of another successful show!
Yeah even during his brief stint in SVU he was really good. He was playing this character only. But he was good.
He was hot in Strike Back
Strike Back was awesome. Him and Sullivan Stapleton might as well have auditioned for Cyclops and Wolverine. Tell me Im wrong.
He was one of the two best parts of Strike Back, the other one being Sullivan Stapleton 😂
is he the young looking lawyer or Dylan or the older looking lawyer?
Some of us are not blessed with a perfect life but we don't kill innocent people
Unfortunately none of us have a perfect life. We fake it through social media and basically saying "look at me and my life that I had." We are human. Even if you think someone has the "perfect life," then you are wrong, because that person feels like life isn't great for them.
Speak for yourself, I for one-
"Some men just want to watch the world burn."
@@nikkimiddlekillsday5161 Phillip watched the dark knight which made him win this case; he compared Dylan to the joker’s just wanna watch the world burn.
Some of us make do with fantasy lives and for some of us, they’re enough to give us some hope for a better future. Even just the simple pleasures that we enjoy are worth the crappy lives we probably enjoy in our own ways.
I just love how stone didn’t even flinch he just stepped back one lil step
Broke my heart when I heard Lexi name and then the site of Al with tears running down his face. Love this series and its realistic characters.
What’s the context for that? I’m new to the show.
@@eringsgrace3560 poor girl dies in a fire that was started by arsons paid by building owner. They locked all but one exit door so most people couldn't get out. It was an episode that stated with him learning about the fire on Chicago pd and continued on Chicago fire. Really sad episode. The trial where AL is crying is the arsonist. Some really good acting on both shows.
And they also killed Al
@@connierichards9121 No you are wrong. The building owner didn't have anything to do with it. It started on Chicago Fire and then continued on Chicago PD then was finished on this show, Chicago Justice.
The young man on trial set the fire because he was rejected by a girl. There were a bunch of young people living in a warehouse and she was one of them. He put wedges under the door so that they couldn't get it open to get out. The Lexi Olinsky that died was the daughter of one of the Detectives.
@@amandabilger2235 may have got shows backward but the father of Lexi was Al who was a detective on Chicago Pd. She died in season 4 and he died in Season 6.
Chicago Justice may have been one season only, but Philip Winchester nailed the role of Stone.
And yeah I know he continued on Law & Order SVU, but my points remains :D
I think it was just set to bring the Stone name back, given the references to Ben Stone, not complaining I love both franchises but kind of wish there was more.
@@nikidalzell9615 well the Stone name certainly helped. But weirdly I am Team McCoy
Conozco a todos los personajes de Chicago PD desde que hace ocho años. empecé a ver... LEY Y ORDEN. Trabajaban. cuando había casos en Chicago y compartían los casos.
Yes he did
Funny thing is, he would rather be seen as an insane maniac that wanted to kill instead of a lonely, sad, angry incel who was jealous of how much fun everyone is having 😂😂😂
Stone was so underrated!!!
Tbh I felt he could've had more seasons in svu
Never knew stone was in Chicago pd , wonder why voight and stabler have not met
@@preciousotoakhia9789 Because they'd probably end up killing a suspect.
This show got canceled?! That's very unfortunate cause this had so much potential to crossover with the other shows
Yeah like blue bloods tulsa kings even law and order or FBI or NCIS New orleans
Well yeah because it's the same character from SVU And he could have worked with Chicago PD And when they did another cross over event between pd and svu He could have shown up to help his old friends
That explains why I haven’t seen much of it online. There’s probably not many episodes of it (at least not as many as the other three Chicago shows).
Because he was alone he chose to act in violence that took the lives of innocent people. He used a woman's rejection as an excuse. But the one factor is choice he wasn't mentally ill he wasn't crazy he chose to kill not 1 person but many who are part of this 1 person's life. Evil doesn't stop it destroys not one but many.
Yeah I know and I found out that the girl who rejected him wanted to be interviewed by Burgess and Lindsay in an episode and she survived but sadly she’s burned up pretty badly and she could spend the following 6-12 months in the burn unit thanks to him, he didn’t kill her but most of her friends who had nothing to do with it had to pay the price sadly😢
He's definitely a monster
He set a building full of teenagers on fire, killing 39 kids you damn right he is a monster
His behaviour does seem to suggest psychopathy or some similar behavioural disorder. Right down to the resentment that he'd been caught and that this... *person* was now 'defaming' him before the jury by claiming that he is a bad person. Because, in his mind, he was, is and always will be a victim of other people.
Monsters feels no remorse.
Anyone who kills many people, is pure cold blooded
He’s actually the third mass murderer I’ve heard of whose name is Dylan, and he’s the only one out of the three who isn’t a real person.
The actor's resemblance to DiCaprio is INSANE. 🤯🤯🤯
I'm surprised nobody said anything either 😂
I thought it was him at first!
Man it still amazes me that’s Ben Stone’s son. So much like his father a very talented prosecutor
Bring back Chicago Justice!!! I don't care if its a completely new cast!! Law and Order did it, so Chicago Justice can do it too!! Who's with me??!!!
The Problem is with bringing it in the line up with law and order's new seasons, shows are too similar (yes I know 7 months)
@terminator3768 they're similar in concept but chicago can easily put a different spin on it. The Chicago franchise has very successfully made its own name apart from the Law and Order franchise. That's part of why we haven't unfortunately seen a crossover between SVU and PD in almost a decade.
@@dakotad70 the shows also dont deal with the kinda criminals that would justify traveling between the 2 cities very often
arsonists, drug dealers, gangs, sex offenders etc, those tend to be more local
What the hell’s happening in Chicago for there to be four different shows taking place in it simultaneously?
So that's like 39 life sentences?
Pretty much
@@Lightingwarrior firing squad with 39 rifles!
Something ludicrous like 39 life sentences with a minimum of 50 years for each count before he can apply for parole (yes, that means 1,950 years before he can apply for parole) plus an extra 30 for the arson. They'll probably also impose fines for court costs and reparations that will mean everything he owns will need to be sold to cover it (and won't).
It's almost as if his outburst in court was proof of his guilt.
That mighta been what Stone was going for
That's exactly what stone was trying to do I'm surprised it took as long as it did
This show needs to come back
A child not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.
Sad the child is a grown ass teenager who was rejected, evil cause he was willing to kill kids, and pathetic it was all for nothing.
"It's not about what happens to you, it's about how you deal with it "
@@nikkimiddlekillsday5161 Facts
Shaka Zulu
@@B1izzardHawk Is that where that quote came from
@@fortminor85 no, but it is a good example. He and his mother were shunned by their village when he was a child. When he became a warlord, he destroyed his old village and killed everyone there save for one man who was the sole individual to show him kindness in life.
Like father like son, Peter Stone is definitely Ben Stones son he be very proud of you. Rest in peace Ben Stone🥲🥲🥲
Elias Koteas, part of the jury, said very little but emoted very much. A working actor who isn't an A or B lister but a great character actor who sometimes steals scenes meant for the others. Bravo. 🎉
He was not on the jury. His daughter was one of the victims.
This crossover show was amazing. Both of them were and they were painful.
Him listing Tumblr killed me 😭
A year and a half later Al died.
Hearing Philip Winchester with his native accent is so strange, i only know him as Stonebridge from Strike Back
Badass show.
I feel like United States right now doesn't really care about who kills or who does whatever anymore it's sad and what world we live in 😢
Pure evil. Plain & simple
Evil Acts of Cowardice
You go Peter!!!
Voight and Stone shows you two types of Justice for this victims.
Voight the street way, Stone the by the book way.
With the hair and the makeup this kid really does look like a very young Leonardo DiCaprio like from the movie "What's Eating Gilbert Grape?"
The kids hairstyle looks more like Leonardo Di Caprios in Catch Me If You Can, Romeo and Juliet, or the Great Gatsby.
Which Leo should of won the Oscar for
Or Matt Damon from Behind the Caberalara (2013)
I only thought there was just 3 chicago series
Fire, Med and PD, and I just found this
Incredible
Poor Al can never catch a break in any of these shows
One my favorite crossovers. I miss Alvin. I loved his character
That prosecutor was making me doubt the guy being guilty. Being a juror would be so hard.
You mean the defence
@@theimperialfistsspacemarin3050 nope, just rewatched it. Mr Stone is the prosecutor. I still doubt he's guilty.
@@catherinep2034 how can a prosecutor make you doubt someone being guilty, it’s they’re job to make someone look guilty
If I ever go to the courtroom and see this man raging, I would like to leave
What a Lawyer
It's crazy to see Casey Jones sitting in this court.
That is how they make it hit home is by listing every single count and the name of the person and declaring him guilty.
And people wonder why lust/obsession and wrath are apart of the 7 deadly sins
Who wanders that?
@@andreponniah9900 quite a few actually.
All the sins(except Sloth) can be beneficial in moderation. The problem is when any of them are unrestrained.
@@georgeeast5502 I disagree I think all the sins can be beneficial to society if they are all kept under restraint and moderation.
Why Sloth as well? Look around you we create a tons of good product so that we can do less work and put in less effort..one good example car.
Many many people forget Greed is also a deadly sin
He looks like decaprio but with 5 different skin care lotions
How did Chicago Justice one last one season?! It could have gone so much longer
And this right here is why I don’t trust trail by jury. (Don’t get me wrong he’s guilty as sin) The lawyer triggered a response that turned the jury against him the second he did that the evidence didn’t matter anymore to them
But only a guilty person would have such a visceral response. Trial by jury isn’t 100% for sure because we’re all human and make descisions off emotions too, however between the evidence and that response he gave himself away lol. The job of lawyers is to take the evidence and spin it in their favor, as it is not always a person writes out their intention and reasoning so the court gets the exact “why”. But when you start banging at the table then try to attack the DA at trial when he’s only talking about a “hypothetical why” . . . You out yourself lol. If I were the one being charged and I know I didn’t do it then I would A. Look confused and probably be mad that I’m on trial for something I didn’t do but B. I damn sure wouldn’t get increasingly mad to a point of attacking in open court when the other side is pulling a hypothetical reasoning. Only someone who is mad about the truth getting exposed has that reaction.
Just like when a person says I swear I’m not lying and such, usually they’re lying lol and are saying that in attempt to get someone to believe them. And lastly both Lawyers ask tons of questions when picking the jury and have strikes they can use to cut the other sides pick. So the jury (decision makers) is chosen by the people trying to win. If it’s a case about a cop who killed an unarmed man you can bet your tail the prosecution is going to strike or dismiss anyone who dislikes cops, dislikes the law, etc. while the defense is going to want jurors who are pro law enforcement, have law enforcement family members etc. Jurors get struck for cause depending on what the case is about and that’s honestly the fairest way. It’s not in 1 persons hand, it’s not just the prosecution or defense picking the jury and it’s not just the next 15 people that answer jury call is automatically the jury. The process makes it super fair, but still since we are all human that rely on emotions it will never be a fool proof thing. People can also lie and a million other things, but the way jury’s are chosen these days is the fairest.
@@carynwaters9153 really and how many mentally ill people are sent to jail cause they have an burst in court? the out burst isnt the issue its the fact that the proscuter coused it on purpouse he pushed his buttions
@@seanbraley2772 as far as i understand jury trials, there is a point, if the lawyer crisses a line, there is typically a retrial with a new jury as the original jury was affected not by facts.
Though i am not a lawyer and only heard what some lawyers said when critiquing tv / movie trials that are fiction.
Same thing with evidence, you typically dont bring random new evidence, it is typically collected during discovery phase and then used in the trial.
But most of the details flew over my head and i might totally wrong here.
@@carynwaters9153 Actually, if you look at how people react when they've been detained by police and accused of a crime, innocent people tend to be the ones who get upset and have a visceral reaction. It's guilty people who tend to react calmly because they've already mentally prepared for the accusation.
@@ObsidianKnight90 not always. I’ve seen people who actual acted like this bloke because they believe it ‘was their right’ to kill that person, that it was always someone else’s fault. Their dads hit them, their mums didn’t love them enough. For people like this, they’ll respond like him. One bloke I know, son of a family friend, he had to restrained as he was violent while expressing his innocence. He was caught beating the kid up, and everything was caught in detail, but according to him and his family he is innocent, didn’t flip out and attack a random person.
Ain’t no lawyer gonna convince me that a guy who is clearly guilty is innocent 😂
One of the best episodes of Chicago P.D in my opinion.
This wasn't part on PD it was the first episode of Chicago Justice and was one of those crossover episodes between all the Chicago series
This was part of Chicago justice however because of the story it crossed over with Chicago fire where it started, and pd when they found proof of arrison then ended with justice cause of the legal process. Sadly Chicago justice was one season I great on however only one
And its not even Chicago PD lol
Never knew stone was in Chicago pd, makes you wonder why Elliot and voight have not met since it is same universe
@@preciousotoakhia9789 Stone was Chicago PD. The episode where Burgess and Roman got shot at. It ended Roman's career as a cop. Stone prosecuted the kid that did it.
Some men just want to watch the world burn
Is the actor playing the perp Leonardo DiCaprio's stunt double or something? The resemblance is uncanny.
Leo hasn’t really looked like that in a long time
Random fact but the Actress who plays Judge Daniella Melnick plays a defence attorney with the same name on Law and order as well as criminal intent.
Law and Order and the Chicago series are in the same universe so she is the same character, she just climbed to the ranks as Judge now
Daniella Melnick was convinced by Jack McCoy in New York to testify against her client and she almost got murdered. I could easily imagine she re-locates to Chicago, dominates the legal scene as an incredible lawyer and becomes a judge.
I thought she looked familiar...
Talk about taking No for an answer gone too far.
OMG, I didn’t realize that was his daughter too, he did right thing not to attack the killer, it’s not worthit. 😢😢😢😢😢, man jsut imagine loosing your wife and kid mannnn. Regardless of how old they get, age is just a number they still your son or daughter.
"Killer attacks lawyer in court".. u call an attack jumping on a table trying to reach someone💀
Well he was clearly trying to attack him.
2:55 "Bits and bites and logarithms" :p So how many people have to not know the difference between algorithm and logarithm for this to be the final edit? My guess is that the writer doesn't know, and the actor just read out whatever they were told to, whether they know it or not.
Lol
4:11 Oh, what's wrong? Did he struck a nerve?
From section 20 as stonebridge to Chicago lawyer as stone
I love when I see a familiar actor. The judge played Deanna on The Walking Dead lol
and the defense attorney is josh from the west wing!
Who's Deanna?
@@cordelianoelle The original leader of the Alexandria Safe Zone before rick and co arrived.
@@scpfoundation8376 I know, it was a joke. Remember what Abraham said when they go there? :) :)
The way Stone was moving i had to think who he reminded me of and it’s the one and only elijah from the originals lol
Dylan Oates may not have done it but Hall and Darrell did.
Stone totally baited that evil freak into doing a guilt confirming outburst
Defendant is a great actor
There was no attack. He didn't even get past the table where he was sitting.
I'm still upset that this show didn't take off like PD fire or med
Is this part of the NBC Chicago?
Yesehia mohcayo lx,s,sos,ls,ss
More realistic than you might think
Hardly an attack!
I love Tovah Feldshuh, who plays the judge.
That's her L&O character now as a judge
@@rhaspodel Is it literally?
Is Chicago justice linked to chicago pd?
I saw Olinsky's daughter between the victims
Chicago Justice was a short lived off shoot of the Chicago series. So this episode had multiple crossovers with Chicago fire, med, and pd.
Chicago Justice is a show in the Chicago Franchise. The other Chicago Franchise shows are Chicago PD, Chicago Med, and Chicago Fire
I saw Olinsky 0:04
Yeah olinsky’s daughter was one of the victims. She also died in that fire in an episode of chicago pd.
Yes it was
Here so many people even famous actors who had sad childhoods and lives but they ever did anything like this
This series needs to be brought back
And if this happened in real life, a mistrial would be called and Stone sanctioned.
I read some where that Chicago PD and Chicago Justice took place in the Law & Order universe
They do. Along with Chicago Fire.
They’re all Dick Wolf produced shows
Did he just say "most people today" and "Tumblr" in the same sentence?
This was 2016
2:48 that guy looks like Leonardo DiCaprio
and people find it strange that some people kinda respect hitmen .
they get paid to do the job, they dont make a scene and kill just their target.
they dont just put a bomb in a family car or destroy the whole restaurant.
Hit men do that too. It's their job to avoid suspicion. They sometimes kill other people to avoid finding of real target
Very noble. In Italy mafia hit men routinely kill children and women of law officials. In Mexico cartel hit men are known to wipe out whole families. South East Asia they do the same, kill the children including babies so that no one can avenge the killings. It's in movies that they depicted as methodical and with 'rules'. The rules are that there are no rules.
@@kanikagaral7637 then the arent true Hitmen
A hitman is hired to kill one target. Killing anything other than that target (aside from any security that compromises their mission), such as innocent people, takes the hitman label off. And it sticks on the Killer one
Man, that party must have been fire. ..... I'll see myself out. 🤣
Peter Stone is a weapon
Why aren't these available on peacock with the rest of Chicago?
Imagine being this much of an incel to where you do this.
Al from Chicago P. D.😢😢😢😢 Why was his character killed? Why?😔😔😔😔😔
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can't talk directly to the jury like that, right?
Wrong. Lawyers do it pretty consistently
Lawyers can, witnesses are directed to respond directly to and can only answer questions from the attorneys and the judge. Amber Heard got caught several times trying to talk directly to the jury, and got reprimanded for it repeatedly.
Are these shows all part of the same universe, his name is Stone in this one and also in L&O SVU
Yeah like these are all part of the same universe.
At some point there was a crossover with Law & Order SVU and Chicago PD.
Why was this show canceled
Ratings and wrong timing.
Too bad real life verdicts aren’t this full of justice!!!
Him: I want you to suffer! Me: i’m leaving, so bye guys! MDTV: bro:💀
Is a Pity that this Show was Unsuccessful my friends. Thanks.
2:07 Phoenix is that you?
That’s the life of phoenix before we met her.
The killer looks like a young Leonardi di Capro.
Danielle became a judge that's amazing
they asked for it for not being polite to him
2 things i didnt know: That Peter was Ben Stone's son, also that Phillip Winchester was Scott Tracy from Thunderbirds( the slightly disappointing 2004 movie)
So, he played Ben Stone's son both on SVU and on Chicago Justice?
Yeah. Shows are set in the same universe
Misleading title. He didn't really attack the lawyer. He was stopped
It's really sad that the pilot episode of this courtroom drama is made to discredit the travesty of the PIZZA GATE!
Is that Al Olinsky from Chicago pd?
no its shaquil oneil
Yep
Chicago PD
Yesehia mohcayo lxls,sls,sl,sls,sls’sl,sos,sl,sos,sl,s
Yo why did josh leave the the White House lol
Hey, it's Red John.
All those innocent people 1:33 sickening
Wasn't this guy on SVU??? The prosecutor I mean. And isn't the judge Danielle Melnick???
his lawyer didnt object once to all that speculation the prosecutor was talking about
Closing arguments don't have them objecting.
Closing arguments are pretty loosely governed. The defence attorney was essentially slandering the ADA all the way through so he could hardly complain about the ADA appealing to emotion in his summation of the evidence.
This series is not continued but cancelled. Never pursued farther!