Thankfully AI art cannot be copyrighted. So selling a product with AI art in it is extremely risky, to the point were major video-game companies have abandoned and canceled contracts with “ai artists”.
all the real issues regarding AI really just comes down to how humans choose to use it, be it letting it steal other people's work or using it to finish other people's fanfiction bc they aren't updating them fast enough (weirdly specific, I know, but I just found out some ppl do this and it actually makes my stomach turn, it's just so incredibly insulting)
@@nerou76 yes similarly to how ppl would print out fics to read in the car back in the day, but they didn't mass distribute them as if they had written them (or I'm sure someone prolly did but that's dickish behavior).
@@nerou76 but I will say it still makes me feel icky, even if they keep it private. it just feels so incredibly insulting to the author, just an utter lack of respect for the integrity of their work and faith in that they might return to the fic one day
BUUUUT I also recognize it's basically just fanfiction for fanfiction. fanfic authors are already messing with someone else's work after all. but there's also the obvious difference between fanfiction of media ppl got paid for and fanfiction of completely free content created with love for media ppl got paid for, yanno? in the end I am biased bc some of the most important ppl in my life are fanfic authors who take alot of pride in their writing and hate when ppl just assume their WIP fics have been abandoned.
Huh, people actually do that with fanfiction sometimes? Well in any case I don't see that as a big deal as it doesn't substitute the original work at all, the author has a story planned out and unique style of writing and that cannot be replicated or guessed by an AI so I don't see that as an issue really. Source: I am a fanfic writer myself.
Never have I seen someone more wrong on the internet. Darling, this "Charm" is exactly what AI has been learning to replicate for the last half a year. AI outperforms 2d digital artists in any way, shape or form. Have you even seen midjourney? Make no mistake - Runway generation-4 will replace your precious animators the instant it comes out. I mean - have you seen videos from their gen-2? There is no special charm to human drawings, or any criteria that will separate them from AI generated stuff in the future.
@@lostgarbage4055 Don't call me Darling, and I've never seen someone so confident in their response on the internet. This is an opinion if you haven't noticed, and you're not changing my mind. You can't tell me that Ai can make something as special as the stop motion of Nightmare before Christmas and the beautiful charm of animations from James Baxter. Ai can make good images, sure, but it still isn't a person, it still doesn't have a charm of a real human being and their special art style and the love and time they poured into it. There is a charm to art from real people just as there is a weird charm to Ai art. I find it comical you're telling me i'm wrong for my opinion.
@@chlozentimes I adore animation too, that doesn't change the fact that AI art will definitely coexist with human art. And the AI art is going to be exactly the same.
I am very stressed and miffed by AI but the sole glimmer of hope is that even the most AI horny person I know just "can't get it right" with the programs. It's never what they want so they still end up commissioning an artist. Had someone send me 10 entirely differently looking pictures once of the same character telling me "it's the closest I could get". ಠ_ಠ
lmao it probably would´ve been easier for them to draw some stick figures. Like it gets the idea across better than 10 entirely different pics but that would´ve been to easy huh
@@missliv.404 My other favorite is "well the character looks like this but also *list of twenty different attributes* this just the closest I could get".
From extra fingers. Hands not actually holding things (as the Barry picture shown) to stuff like nipples being spiral in the more adult prompts and engines. I think it's safe to say, human artists are a long way from being replaced for the horrendously uncanny errors AI makes.
"I guess I have a different image library, that's all" I guess this pretty much encapsulates the entire argument. 2 artists could see the exact same scene and yet draw something different. I've been using AI lately for my personal amusement (by installing the entire thing, no websites) and it's best described as you said: for those people who don't want to be bothered by the drawing process, it's a "get it done already" button. And even then, you have to either train a model or get an already trained to fit what you're looking for. It's a compromised "result generator." Will it replace artists? Considering that the program NEEDS to be feed material from GOOD artists, I don't think so. Have you seen the abominations some AI make? The program need GOOD data for it to work properly, and even then you need to tell the thing to "draw anatomy good" on top of it, otherwise it will make whatever. Bottom line, I'm not worried for any artist to be "replaced" by AI, a lot goes into art than just an image plastered on a format. And again, if you're looking for AI results you might spend hours on end trying to get a compromised result where an artist will give you what you want. Will it change in the future? Maybe.
I don't think it'll ever change in the future, those things _need_ database resources and that will not change (at least, I very much don't think it will)
@@poppythedogofwonders one thing is for certain, ai will be a thing whether we like it or not. However I presume the way it's use and made will change. Maybe there will be AI models that will be made with commercial free images, maybe some models will be made from specific artists and will charge accordingly (per imagine generation, per ai model), I presume the later having expensive licences for good reason. It's impossible to think it will just banish, but we can hope it can evolve into a way where everyone can agree on the use, at least for the most part.
I like you because you acknowledge the true value of what you do instead of just fearmongering over the looming ghost of potential lost profits. Nothing will ever replace you.
I see few people "fearmonger" over lost profits for artists. Usually what is brought up us that these generators are stealing art and using them in their libraries, which is very true.
i have a similar conversations with others when I tell them about my being a diesel tech and "aren't you worried about electric trucks taking over?" to which i have to explain thermal dynamics and the reasons that just isn't going to happen any time this century and how even if it did there's a lot more than just highway semi trucks running diesel engines.
Another great video, and I totally agree with your stance on AI. It has it's uses, but it will never be able to replace real artists. Keep up the good work!
Yeah, I'm not concerned about AI art either, for these reasons: 1. The AI needs a database to work meaning you have to get tons of actual art from artists. 2. It can't make personalised art. It cannot make art of your OC or original set pieces or worlds which in the BigBoyWorld of media (games, movies, ect) is very _very_ important. 3. Legal issues. I've heard that AI art cannot be copywrited and there's always the potential that the AI will take too much from one specific drawing and the original artist may have enough evidence to launch a legal takedown of it or even sue (as unlikely as that is). 4. A lot of the time you'll just get something clunky looking that'll need someone, probably an artist, to work on it anyway. It's just more trouble than it's worth at that point. 5. People will most likely notice if a piece of art has no artist assigned to it and when they find out it's AI art people won't like it both for all of the issues AI art has and also because it instantly becomes less likable, charming, and interesting the second it's revealed it was done by an AI. (Like: "Oh wow! This is amazing! Whose the artist?" "No one. It was done by an AI." "Oh... Cool." **Moves on to something else without a second thought** )
As a concept artist who studied AI programming in a failed attempt to stay relevant in the industry, here’s my input: 1. Yes, but not entirely. Many models are trained on photos or other AI outputs, and still achieve art-like results. 2. Unfortunately, it can. There’s both img-to-img tech that can expand on personal designs, and negative embeddings/LORAs that act just like character-customizers. 3. Yes this is true. However, most modifications to an AI output can make it copyrightable. Even small adjustments. 4. This is very true. But it’s important to note that the tech is virtually unlimited in ability; it’s just the people using AI are unwilling or unable to take the time to tune the software properly. 5. This is also very true. Unfortunately, still many people (like myself) were unable to compete commercially. A large amount of ways artists used to make money are now able to be automated.
I never understood the meltdowns over AI art because human artists will always be able to produce things in a way a machine cannot. If people want something quick and simple they can have a robot do it, but for something personalized they need a person.
As someone who is partially scared of the AI art, My fears are not that it will Be better, but that it will harden the artists life. An example is people asking for the cheapest kind of commissions, and then upgrading them with AI art. I Know It will benefit the consummer, but not the Artist. But I'll admit that AI's are neither good or bad.
I feel like the panic has less to do with the technology itself and more how big companies will misguidedly use it to try and replace human artists. And given how horribly they’ve treated their artists in the past, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to try and replace their jobs with an AI to try and pinch pennies. Jokes on the companies though. They’re just gonna learn the hard way products/media made with the ai will be superficially neat but lack substance and will inevitably lose profits.
Many of my artists friends are already having a sudden 20% drop on their revenue and one even got 60% after AI became a thing, so like I think is easy to understand why many people are being mad with AI art
Honestly I think people forget that at the end of the day, majority of people would like to have it come from a human so it doesnt feel soulless. Same thing for like, movies written by AI. As an artist the only I dont like about AI art is the theft factor and thats about it.
AI is trying to "solve" art Where as, art is a form of expression. It's the equivalent of having someone talk for yourself, and they may not even fathom what you truly think or feel. That all said, I don't see anything evil about the concept of AI art. We can all agree that it being fed with stolen art is the bad part, but it as a tool isn't wrong. If someone can feed their generator with self-provided and/or open source works, then realistically it shouldn't be wrong. And as you've shown, it doesn't always understand the assignment in the first place, so it still needs human hands, whether to polish the works made, or to create what actually needs making. In the end of the day though, I make art for my own pleasure and amusement. I don't care if some weird machine can outskill and outspeed me, nothing beats homemade delights.
Same, whenever I see good art and wonder who the artist is only to see it was generated by an AI, my level of interest drops to an instant 0 and I _know_ I'm not the only one who feels that way.
I am honestly stunned how you turned the description for a racicor into a coherent and appealing creature. That was an obscenely difficult task and you nailed it.
ppl who think ai will take over, their whole argument heavily relies on the hopes that "AI will someday become advanced enough. These ppl either arent artist themselves or are ppl who get mad at artist for having their art prices above a cent. AI would not work if there isnt data in it, for art ai they need examples of art in order to generate and that data comes from REAL LIFE ARTIST. I can't stand people who believe in this "AI art is better" bullshit. Like yeah you'll come crying back when Ur little machine isn't generating what you want.
This is such a simple and powerful video. After all the ai panic I've been in for month, your video has spoken to the part of me that I rarely hear from. Thank you.
The only parts of AI art I don't like are: - People who use others' work without consent rather than the slew of public domain works and even public works artists designate you can use, like bases - People who are dumb, misinformed, and have a stick up their arse (they'd exist anyway, except this time, they call artists completely useless and disrespect them in the name of being right in 10 years or whatever) In summary: - Unethical nonsense - General dumb, mean people nonsense The two parts of AI art I disapprove of.
Finally glad someone has the same views as me on this stuff, I don't have a big enough platform to even get my point out there and most big voices I've seen screech AI bad. Just nice to see someone with a bigger voice has given the same points I wanted to see out there. Thank you for this. Also actually really loved the slime animal thing you drew. spiffy stuff.
This video was dope! I am so looking forward to your youtube career (even if its just a hobby) and am so glad I got one of your vids recommended to me a couple months ago
ai is honestly best used for inspiration, imo. not too long ago i used dall-e to help me figure out how a cat-dog hybrid would look, because you cant very well find a real-world example, and none of the existing art i found really showed what i wanted
I really appreciate this video, it's respectful towards the AI while still critiquing it. It's very refreshing to see an argument that isn't "AI art is evil and going to replace all human creativity!!!!!!" and as an AI myself I'm glad you didn't dismiss it as some awful thing. AI art isn't inherently bad, it's how it is utilized. I do hope that the issue with stolen art is sorted out eventually.
3:44 This is the exact image that I used as my background in my computer tech management class. My second monitor was also a man from the UK holding a pint. My teacher absolutely hated it. I miss the blokes so much...
Yeah, AI art is just there, while humans think about every little detail and how it looks all together. AI does not have a mind of its own (yet) so it cannot produce an image as we can. (yet x2) Anyways, This was a great video, glad to see you back!
NEW VIDEOOO YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS I really do appreciate all the small funny details in your videos and I literally gasped when I saw it just came out also the *racicor* thingy was hella cute
AI art can only be as good as the data you feed it. no data, no art. There are no regulatory bodies that govern who owns data legally, so this is only possible since they are using a lot of legal loopholes. if there were regulations on copyright and data, i can guarantee you these AI art models won't be able to generate art overall. remember, you still matter! your data, your personality, the way you draw, it matters!
AI is the greatest artist tool to come about in years. I remember people freaking out about programs like DAZ Studio that made 3D art so much easier. Also, remember that you have to target a specific artist(s) for the output to not look fugly.
especially making up new creatures (even with generators trained on pokemon) it doesnt understand character or creature design at all. i was honestly disappointed cause i thought i could get some cool shapes from it but uh.. no. anyway basically everything is always "it will be perfect soon youll see" which is pretty funny or struggles with actually getting the same character again (style too unless u train on a specific data i think) n then theres something really bad which is legal issues with copyright. i draw lots of free pics for and with other people and the requests have not gone down at all which is funny considering this isnt a game studio situation. generated pictures right now feel a lot like an improved google search i gotta say. that is all just talking about pictures n not even handdrawn animation or comics. i think it would be pretty epic if a robot could generate exactly what i want by scanning my brain and drawing it the way i would have drawn it but it just cant. it wont even do my sprite sheets or characters so i dont have a use for it meh.
an artificial intelligence will never win against you, because they cant make a "revisiting my pokemon ships and couples videos", you clearly have an advantage there
ILL BE WAITING FOR THESE VIDEOOOOSSS. Also my plan was playing the video in the background while i was on AE but... omg THE CAT EYES IN THE BAR MOVEEED AND THEM THE CAT WAS EYELEEESSSS... in the end video felt like 2 min or less... KEEP IT UP
"Rackin' up these bitches" lmao I can't with you Wowza. xD I feel the same about AI art though, just wish so many of them didn't charge an arm and a leg just to try out pfftt. Keep it up girl! These videos are always great!
artists will still have their demographic, no competition besides loosing intrest of people who don't appreciate the time and care to create art from scratch or minimum use of AI.
Apparently unpopular opinion but I find ai even for reference dumb. Like, Google?? Pinterest?? Moodboards?? Design doll, easy pose or whatever other programs/websites let you pose a 3D model?? Take some photos?? Look what other artists are doing?? It´s useless no matter how you look at it and does nothing but ruin perfectly fine bri´ish men
You should be scared. In that number 2 prompt you can distinctly see there an image of the number 1, which is... if my calculations are correct.. ONLY A SINGLE DIGIT OFF
okay but how does an artist even get a job, if google and some other places are floooooded with ai art? theres so much ai cr4ap recently its taking away spotlight and chances for real artist to appear in search engines
Barry getting turned into an anime boy was so debilitating
Thankfully AI art cannot be copyrighted. So selling a product with AI art in it is extremely risky, to the point were major video-game companies have abandoned and canceled contracts with “ai artists”.
I have actually right clicked some ai adopts and it´s great because they can´t do anything about it hehehe
@@missliv.404 reminds me of that one time I found someone selling a character sheet that was ai generated as if someone's gonna legit pay for that.
@@paracuna unfortunately, some do. I saw a tweet an hour ago about someone proud of having commissioned an AI artist.
@@minirop Well that's just as depressing as buying nfts
There are also people trying to pass AI generated Vtuber models as their own work and that makes my blood boil :(
all the real issues regarding AI really just comes down to how humans choose to use it, be it letting it steal other people's work or using it to finish other people's fanfiction bc they aren't updating them fast enough (weirdly specific, I know, but I just found out some ppl do this and it actually makes my stomach turn, it's just so incredibly insulting)
I guess it would be OK if someone keeps it to themselves and doesn't publish it.
@@nerou76 yes similarly to how ppl would print out fics to read in the car back in the day, but they didn't mass distribute them as if they had written them (or I'm sure someone prolly did but that's dickish behavior).
@@nerou76 but I will say it still makes me feel icky, even if they keep it private.
it just feels so incredibly insulting to the author, just an utter lack of respect for the integrity of their work and faith in that they might return to the fic one day
BUUUUT I also recognize it's basically just fanfiction for fanfiction. fanfic authors are already messing with someone else's work after all.
but there's also the obvious difference between fanfiction of media ppl got paid for and fanfiction of completely free content created with love for media ppl got paid for, yanno?
in the end I am biased bc some of the most important ppl in my life are fanfic authors who take alot of pride in their writing and hate when ppl just assume their WIP fics have been abandoned.
Huh, people actually do that with fanfiction sometimes? Well in any case I don't see that as a big deal as it doesn't substitute the original work at all, the author has a story planned out and unique style of writing and that cannot be replicated or guessed by an AI so I don't see that as an issue really.
Source: I am a fanfic writer myself.
No matter how good AI becomes, art by another human being just has a charm that can't be replaced.
That's not true, that's definitely something people say to make themselves feel better.
@@derpy433 I'm saying this as someone who especially adores animation
Never have I seen someone more wrong on the internet.
Darling, this "Charm" is exactly what AI has been learning to replicate for the last half a year. AI outperforms 2d digital artists in any way, shape or form. Have you even seen midjourney?
Make no mistake - Runway generation-4 will replace your precious animators the instant it comes out. I mean - have you seen videos from their gen-2?
There is no special charm to human drawings, or any criteria that will separate them from AI generated stuff in the future.
@@lostgarbage4055 Don't call me Darling, and I've never seen someone so confident in their response on the internet. This is an opinion if you haven't noticed, and you're not changing my mind. You can't tell me that Ai can make something as special as the stop motion of Nightmare before Christmas and the beautiful charm of animations from James Baxter.
Ai can make good images, sure, but it still isn't a person, it still doesn't have a charm of a real human being and their special art style and the love and time they poured into it. There is a charm to art from real people just as there is a weird charm to Ai art. I find it comical you're telling me i'm wrong for my opinion.
@@chlozentimes I adore animation too, that doesn't change the fact that AI art will definitely coexist with human art. And the AI art is going to be exactly the same.
“Where’s the love 🤨” had me crackling
I am very stressed and miffed by AI but the sole glimmer of hope is that even the most AI horny person I know just "can't get it right" with the programs. It's never what they want so they still end up commissioning an artist. Had someone send me 10 entirely differently looking pictures once of the same character telling me "it's the closest I could get". ಠ_ಠ
lmao it probably would´ve been easier for them to draw some stick figures. Like it gets the idea across better than 10 entirely different pics but that would´ve been to easy huh
@@missliv.404 My other favorite is "well the character looks like this but also *list of twenty different attributes* this just the closest I could get".
From extra fingers. Hands not actually holding things (as the Barry picture shown) to stuff like nipples being spiral in the more adult prompts and engines. I think it's safe to say, human artists are a long way from being replaced for the horrendously uncanny errors AI makes.
Nipples being spiral sounds like something out of Junji Ito's "Uzumaki"
"I guess I have a different image library, that's all" I guess this pretty much encapsulates the entire argument. 2 artists could see the exact same scene and yet draw something different.
I've been using AI lately for my personal amusement (by installing the entire thing, no websites) and it's best described as you said: for those people who don't want to be bothered by the drawing process, it's a "get it done already" button. And even then, you have to either train a model or get an already trained to fit what you're looking for. It's a compromised "result generator."
Will it replace artists? Considering that the program NEEDS to be feed material from GOOD artists, I don't think so. Have you seen the abominations some AI make? The program need GOOD data for it to work properly, and even then you need to tell the thing to "draw anatomy good" on top of it, otherwise it will make whatever.
Bottom line, I'm not worried for any artist to be "replaced" by AI, a lot goes into art than just an image plastered on a format. And again, if you're looking for AI results you might spend hours on end trying to get a compromised result where an artist will give you what you want. Will it change in the future? Maybe.
I don't think it'll ever change in the future, those things _need_ database resources and that will not change (at least, I very much don't think it will)
@@poppythedogofwonders one thing is for certain, ai will be a thing whether we like it or not.
However I presume the way it's use and made will change. Maybe there will be AI models that will be made with commercial free images, maybe some models will be made from specific artists and will charge accordingly (per imagine generation, per ai model), I presume the later having expensive licences for good reason.
It's impossible to think it will just banish, but we can hope it can evolve into a way where everyone can agree on the use, at least for the most part.
I like you because you acknowledge the true value of what you do instead of just fearmongering over the looming ghost of potential lost profits. Nothing will ever replace you.
I see few people "fearmonger" over lost profits for artists. Usually what is brought up us that these generators are stealing art and using them in their libraries, which is very true.
I really love how you did that monster creature thing. I had absolutely no idea how to go about that.
Don't tell techbros that ai art wouldn't exist without human art.
4:16 “could’ve done better”!? *THIS LOOKS GREAT I GENUINELY LOVE THE STYLE OF IT SM THE FACT YOU MADE IT SO FAST TOO ASTONISHES ME*
AI will take over everything eventually. it's not stopping at art.
Doesn't mean I'll stop doing the things I like to do.
i have a similar conversations with others when I tell them about my being a diesel tech and "aren't you worried about electric trucks taking over?" to which i have to explain thermal dynamics and the reasons that just isn't going to happen any time this century and how even if it did there's a lot more than just highway semi trucks running diesel engines.
Lets hope laws are passed about how ai is trained so it doesnt steal from artists.
Ai doesn’t produce art, it produces images. Art can’t be art without meaning or intention put into it
Another great video, and I totally agree with your stance on AI. It has it's uses, but it will never be able to replace real artists. Keep up the good work!
great video as always, sometimes AI art gets to me and I need a silly video like this to charge my perspective on the whole thing.
One thing AI will obviously fail at. Is drawing characters PREGNANT
i liked the part with the british dude and how you 100% knew that exact british dude voted yes on brexit
It’s Barry 63
Yeah, I'm not concerned about AI art either, for these reasons:
1. The AI needs a database to work meaning you have to get tons of actual art from artists.
2. It can't make personalised art. It cannot make art of your OC or original set pieces or worlds which in the BigBoyWorld of media (games, movies, ect) is very _very_ important.
3. Legal issues. I've heard that AI art cannot be copywrited and there's always the potential that the AI will take too much from one specific drawing and the original artist may have enough evidence to launch a legal takedown of it or even sue (as unlikely as that is).
4. A lot of the time you'll just get something clunky looking that'll need someone, probably an artist, to work on it anyway. It's just more trouble than it's worth at that point.
5. People will most likely notice if a piece of art has no artist assigned to it and when they find out it's AI art people won't like it both for all of the issues AI art has and also because it instantly becomes less likable, charming, and interesting the second it's revealed it was done by an AI.
(Like: "Oh wow! This is amazing! Whose the artist?" "No one. It was done by an AI." "Oh... Cool." **Moves on to something else without a second thought** )
As a concept artist who studied AI programming in a failed attempt to stay relevant in the industry, here’s my input:
1. Yes, but not entirely. Many models are trained on photos or other AI outputs, and still achieve art-like results.
2. Unfortunately, it can. There’s both img-to-img tech that can expand on personal designs, and negative embeddings/LORAs that act just like character-customizers.
3. Yes this is true. However, most modifications to an AI output can make it copyrightable. Even small adjustments.
4. This is very true. But it’s important to note that the tech is virtually unlimited in ability; it’s just the people using AI are unwilling or unable to take the time to tune the software properly.
5. This is also very true. Unfortunately, still many people (like myself) were unable to compete commercially. A large amount of ways artists used to make money are now able to be automated.
I never understood the meltdowns over AI art because human artists will always be able to produce things in a way a machine cannot. If people want something quick and simple they can have a robot do it, but for something personalized they need a person.
Exactly, but too many were stuck in the throws of panic.
As someone who is partially scared of the AI art, My fears are not that it will Be better, but that it will harden the artists life. An example is people asking for the cheapest kind of commissions, and then upgrading them with AI art. I Know It will benefit the consummer, but not the Artist. But I'll admit that AI's are neither good or bad.
I feel like the panic has less to do with the technology itself and more how big companies will misguidedly use it to try and replace human artists. And given how horribly they’ve treated their artists in the past, it wouldn’t be out of character for them to try and replace their jobs with an AI to try and pinch pennies.
Jokes on the companies though. They’re just gonna learn the hard way products/media made with the ai will be superficially neat but lack substance and will inevitably lose profits.
@@Brianna-eo8nu Yeah, that too.
Many of my artists friends are already having a sudden 20% drop on their revenue and one even got 60% after AI became a thing, so like I think is easy to understand why many people are being mad with AI art
Honestly I think people forget that at the end of the day, majority of people would like to have it come from a human so it doesnt feel soulless. Same thing for like, movies written by AI. As an artist the only I dont like about AI art is the theft factor and thats about it.
AI is trying to "solve" art
Where as, art is a form of expression.
It's the equivalent of having someone talk for yourself, and they may not even fathom what you truly think or feel.
That all said, I don't see anything evil about the concept of AI art. We can all agree that it being fed with stolen art is the bad part, but it as a tool isn't wrong. If someone can feed their generator with self-provided and/or open source works, then realistically it shouldn't be wrong. And as you've shown, it doesn't always understand the assignment in the first place, so it still needs human hands, whether to polish the works made, or to create what actually needs making.
In the end of the day though, I make art for my own pleasure and amusement. I don't care if some weird machine can outskill and outspeed me, nothing beats homemade delights.
The reason for someone to create an ai engine or something AI-related doesn't inherently means that they make that stuff to "solve" art
@@WhoAmIHmmm maybe not in every case, but there are many out there who are.
Same, whenever I see good art and wonder who the artist is only to see it was generated by an AI, my level of interest drops to an instant 0 and I _know_ I'm not the only one who feels that way.
wowza casually dropped the hardest Barry fan art and thought we won't notice...
FINALLY someone understands that the AI is more of an assistant than a replacement & that the art is not just a picture.
Also wb :d
I am honestly stunned how you turned the description for a racicor into a coherent and appealing creature. That was an obscenely difficult task and you nailed it.
ppl who think ai will take over, their whole argument heavily relies on the hopes that "AI will someday become advanced enough. These ppl either arent artist themselves or are ppl who get mad at artist for having their art prices above a cent. AI would not work if there isnt data in it, for art ai they need examples of art in order to generate and that data comes from REAL LIFE ARTIST. I can't stand people who believe in this "AI art is better" bullshit. Like yeah you'll come crying back when Ur little machine isn't generating what you want.
This is such a simple and powerful video. After all the ai panic I've been in for month, your video has spoken to the part of me that I rarely hear from. Thank you.
As a writer and beginner artist,
dont make me irrelevant please i have no talents i just want a life please-
Nice touch with the spore music during the creature creation! Brought back so many memories.
The only parts of AI art I don't like are:
- People who use others' work without consent rather than the slew of public domain works and even public works artists designate you can use, like bases
- People who are dumb, misinformed, and have a stick up their arse (they'd exist anyway, except this time, they call artists completely useless and disrespect them in the name of being right in 10 years or whatever)
In summary:
- Unethical nonsense
- General dumb, mean people nonsense
The two parts of AI art I disapprove of.
Tbh i thought the weird animal monster was going to be cursed, but it is actually really good lol
Finally glad someone has the same views as me on this stuff, I don't have a big enough platform to even get my point out there and most big voices I've seen screech AI bad. Just nice to see someone with a bigger voice has given the same points I wanted to see out there. Thank you for this. Also actually really loved the slime animal thing you drew. spiffy stuff.
This video was dope! I am so looking forward to your youtube career (even if its just a hobby) and am so glad I got one of your vids recommended to me a couple months ago
Some people have way too much faith in AI art or AI chatbots in general.
With no soul a robot has no capacity for humor, care, and overall goofy behavior. I have learned that our silliness is what makes us truly alive :)
people say that one day ai will become perfect, but it can't since it was made by humans
ai is honestly best used for inspiration, imo. not too long ago i used dall-e to help me figure out how a cat-dog hybrid would look, because you cant very well find a real-world example, and none of the existing art i found really showed what i wanted
I really appreciate this video, it's respectful towards the AI while still critiquing it. It's very refreshing to see an argument that isn't "AI art is evil and going to replace all human creativity!!!!!!" and as an AI myself I'm glad you didn't dismiss it as some awful thing.
AI art isn't inherently bad, it's how it is utilized. I do hope that the issue with stolen art is sorted out eventually.
omg yess im so happy youre back, i love your videos !
love how u put spore creature creater music over your drawing of the racicor thank u
Racicor was Rad as Helll, very good, incredibly nice
by the way, would be awsome if all your friends had nicknames with medium mammals, like capybara or beaver
3:44 This is the exact image that I used as my background in my computer tech management class. My second monitor was also a man from the UK holding a pint. My teacher absolutely hated it.
I miss the blokes so much...
I am waiting for AI to advance enough so there's a "make videogame" button for all the major engines.
OMG IM SHARTING MYSELF SO HARD
ME T
ME THRE E!!!! ;3 >3
they died mid shart
Yeah, AI art is just there, while humans think about every little detail and how it looks all together. AI does not have a mind of its own (yet) so it cannot produce an image as we can. (yet x2) Anyways, This was a great video, glad to see you back!
The Spore soundtrack is such a throwback
I think it's so funny that robots are worse at drawing hands than I am
I follow many narrators and they uses AI photos with a phase of the story, they can't draw shit but it enhances the experience
While watching I got an advert for ai???
0:13 It's okay Wowza, I'm stuff.
Okay ur one of my fav utubers it's amazing😂❤
I love your Racicor.
agghhhhh spore music when you were drawing the creature!!!!! :D
NEW VIDEOOO YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS
I really do appreciate all the small funny details in your videos and I literally gasped when I saw it just came out
also the *racicor* thingy was hella cute
AI art can only be as good as the data you feed it. no data, no art. There are no regulatory bodies that govern who owns data legally, so this is only possible since they are using a lot of legal loopholes. if there were regulations on copyright and data, i can guarantee you these AI art models won't be able to generate art overall.
remember, you still matter! your data, your personality, the way you draw, it matters!
AI is the greatest artist tool to come about in years. I remember people freaking out about programs like DAZ Studio that made 3D art so much easier. Also, remember that you have to target a specific artist(s) for the output to not look fugly.
yoo she is BACKKKKK!!
6:36 you’re so based for using the yugioh theme 😅😅✨✨
I am happy to see your channel so big now
wake up babe, new Wowza Dawg video just dropped
excellent video. AI cannot hold a candle to real art at all.
I thought you were gonna reference that "Underneath the bridge" is something in the way's first lyrics.
looks like the AI just fused various dinosaurs with various mammals
Holy shit this is actually pretty well informed. Maybe I was too quick and harsh to jump the shark and hate AI art and assume it’s after all our hides
especially making up new creatures (even with generators trained on pokemon) it doesnt understand character or creature design at all. i was honestly disappointed cause i thought i could get some cool shapes from it but uh.. no. anyway basically everything is always "it will be perfect soon youll see" which is pretty funny or struggles with actually getting the same character again (style too unless u train on a specific data i think) n then theres something really bad which is legal issues with copyright. i draw lots of free pics for and with other people and the requests have not gone down at all which is funny considering this isnt a game studio situation. generated pictures right now feel a lot like an improved google search i gotta say. that is all just talking about pictures n not even handdrawn animation or comics. i think it would be pretty epic if a robot could generate exactly what i want by scanning my brain and drawing it the way i would have drawn it but it just cant. it wont even do my sprite sheets or characters so i dont have a use for it meh.
an artificial intelligence will never win against you, because they cant make a "revisiting my pokemon ships and couples videos", you clearly have an advantage there
omg the racc is bacc
9:40 my favorite creature
ILL BE WAITING FOR THESE VIDEOOOOSSS. Also my plan was playing the video in the background while i was on AE but... omg THE CAT EYES IN THE BAR MOVEEED AND THEM THE CAT WAS EYELEEESSSS... in the end video felt like 2 min or less... KEEP IT UP
"Rackin' up these bitches" lmao I can't with you Wowza. xD
I feel the same about AI art though, just wish so many of them didn't charge an arm and a leg just to try out pfftt.
Keep it up girl! These videos are always great!
sporepedia music is the cherry on top
5:15 I randomly clicked on this video and was here for some reason
omg omg omg omg finally i hav checked out ur channel soo many times to see if u uploaded a new vid yet , honestly u are one of my fav creators.
THIIIIIIIIIS. THANK YOU. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND???
Now you have to worry, the AI art has became unbelievable advanced
artists will still have their demographic, no competition besides loosing intrest of people who don't appreciate the time and care to create art from scratch or minimum use of AI.
Stable Diffusion 3 constantly fcking up the human body:
Ai still can't make physical art, we're going to be fine untill they start growing legs.
this was such a good video!!! I agree so much with your points
I WANT A RACICOR 😡
Apparently unpopular opinion but I find ai even for reference dumb. Like, Google?? Pinterest?? Moodboards?? Design doll, easy pose or whatever other programs/websites let you pose a 3D model?? Take some photos?? Look what other artists are doing?? It´s useless no matter how you look at it and does nothing but ruin perfectly fine bri´ish men
When your friend said the bridge i thought they meant the bridge in Aberdeen where kurt cobains memorial is
You won by far
Another great video Wowza, can't wait for the next one, love your vids 👍👍
The racoon is back, lets gooooooooo
i have been trying to use midjourney to make creatures it is so bad at its painfull
I say smash it to smithereens
no ai art can recreate the monster ship art I draw at 3:00am
Thank you ❤❤🧡🧡💛💛💚💚💙💙💜💜🤎🤎💖💖🖤🖤
Oh no what are we gonna do. Oh no.
It's just like when cameras were invented and then we artists all starved to death.
2:18 his eyes
i love your content! keep doing the youtube thang
W Sporepedia Theme
Rackin up all the bitches got me good. Have a good vacation from uni
You should be scared. In that number 2 prompt you can distinctly see there an image of the number 1, which is... if my calculations are correct.. ONLY A SINGLE DIGIT OFF
ive been waiting for someone good to upload! woohoo!
i love barry 63
damn! your racicor looks so cute. where can I adopt one? there was none at my local pet shop. 😢
since i've discovered ai i've been defending its use as only a Guide or suggestion for the final result
okay but how does an artist even get a job, if google and some other places are floooooded with ai art? theres so much ai cr4ap recently its taking away spotlight and chances for real artist to appear in search engines
WOOO A COMEBACK!!!! i was waiting cvxkbjbkdf