I’ve blown some serious bucks on a few wrong watch choices. Tomorrow I’m picking up my Sub. It’ll be my daily for as long as I have left on this Earth. Edit: Picked up a new Swa Dweller 43 instead. Love it. Sub with benefits.
I have been wearing my 1991 16610 since new! Never worried about it. Serviced twice in 33 years and is still worn everyday and is also +2 everyday. I can also put my old 3135 on its side every other day and gets the same result. I really can’t be arsed , it’s 14 seconds fast every Sunday when I reset and wind. It’s scratched it’s so comfortable and not heavy at all. I think it’s a little more reserved than the ceramic models and I personally like that. Nobody gives a f*’k about it and all the time I have worn it it’s never had a single comment and I have worn it to do everything, never taken off!
I can relate, whilst mine is only 21 years old, and in summers I swap it to a rubberb strap for comfort, makes it look like Yachtmaster. It flys under the radar. You can wear and forget. And I agree, there is no substitute.
I have a Submariner Date that I purchased from an Authorized dealer in the Bahamas in 2004 for about 5k US. The wife and I just walked in off the street and bought it on a whim. I have had it service twice now (by an authorized dealer), both complete overhauls that cost over $1000.00 each time (ouch) I definitely need to start taking better care of it. It is a great watch and I wear it everyday, as such it gets pretty beat up but the good news is that when you send it for service they buff right out. Enjoy
@@whereRbearsTeeth Buffing out the scratches does not drop the value if anything it increases the value because it looks and works like a new watch and it has a warranty to boot
Wear the watch, don't let the watch wear you! Great video, and glad you've been enjoying your Sub so much. I wear mine the same. I looked at it like this. When someone buys a vintage Sub, the seller will usually keep it in the used condition from the previous owner, and the buyer will typically not look to restore because of the story it tells. I chose to write mine's first story, and like you will pass it down. Keep up the fantastic work!
I’ve had mine one year as well (white gold version). The only complaint I have is the scratches. My SS version was like yours, nothing major, but the gold sure scratches easily.
I bought one too in 2022 when this refreshed model first came out. Love the changes, especially the slimmed down lugs versus the previous model. As a lifelong Submariner fan, I think this is the perfect one. Also nice is that I then sold my first Submariner I bought new in 1997 $3500 for $8200 on eBay, and it paid for most of my new one. Kind of hard to go wrong there! If I had to sell all my watches and keep just one, this is it.
I bought this watch, I feel the same as you do about it. My son loves it and plays with the dial, and I tell him it will be his watch one day. The most satisfying part is on the the go adjustment, every SS bracelet should have this feature, my wrist changes size throughout the day and this bracelet is amazing. I will however say, I recently have the opportunity to wear a Rolex GMT Master 2 for a week or so and the Jubiliee bracelet on that watch and the 40mm case is even more comfortable than the Sub 41. My wrist is 17.5 cm for reference. I see a GMT in my future but at the time it wasn't on my list.
Me gusta que hables de la parte emocional de un reloj, es tan importante como el reloj en si mismo. Los lazos que te unen a una pieza en concreto son personales y sin precio. Este Rolex es un reloj magnífico pero lo es aún más porque para ti representa algo más (y en poco tiempo también para tu hijo). Saludos desde Galicia (España) y gracias por el contenido de calidad que nos ofreces.
I got a call for the 126610 but actually wanted the classic Submariner 124060 and was surprised that they were able to accommodate for that the same day and picked it up right away. I don't mind the cyclops on some Rolex watches but having some watches with it already (DJ36 and GMTs) the symmetrical 124060 only made sense for me.
Best Rolex for me. But the no date version. The purest one for me. Right now I have mint DJ41 on jubilee and I think about exchanging it for a last gen no date Sub as it is THE watch that got me into watches. And you are right - a Sub is a Sub. And if you want it, nothing will replace it.
Did you at some point regret grabbing the date instead of no date? I am just curious, I'm just on the waiting list for the date, no problem with Cyclops at all... and I think the date will nice companion to my Exp 36. Btw, what a lovely long term review, nicely smooth. 👌
Here is the thing, that cyclops has become synonymous with Rolex as most Rolex sports models have the cyclops. This also means that the watch on your wrist will be more likely to be recognized as a Rolex by people who see it.
Never found Tudor "subs" attractive. The ONE Tudor I always liked and still like is the North Flag! It didn't catch on in popularity, but it's still on my wish list
I understand that in terms of mechanics this is very impressive, state of the mechanical art watch but look of it is so generic. It doesn't speaks to me at all! I would mod it. True story... Also: I would love to see some durability, accuracy tests like many watch enthusiast do with other watch brands (mostly with Casio). Lack of such tests is rather obvious answer what Rolex mostly/really is: an exclusive fashion piece, made for snobs (no offence here!) who judge their status on what they have and keep their watches in pristine condition as capital investment. I know that Rolex was used in some missions here and there but it was long time ago... I know you are not a snob (or not bigger than typical watch collector guy - "judging" on your YT channel which I follow for quite long time, which features so many cool and beautiful watches) but I don't see any reason to feel excitement about this particular watch or spend my money on watch I don't like and its accuracy is much lower than Casio F-91W which costs 20$. It is soulless, mechanical marvel...
Rolex is far from just a fashion piece. Yes, they are a victim of their own success which makes them a "flex" piece, but underneath that "hype" is truly one of the best mechanical watches out there, especially when it comes to toughness and durability! I have two that are 18 and 20 years old, never been serviced and both STILL keep time within 2 seconds a day, which is astonishing!! Other mechanical watches I own can't do it even when new. And another thing is consistency. They keep that time regardless of power reserve level or my way of wearing them. Something Seiko seems to struggle to achieve. I'll have a Seiko that keeps the same time because it is regulated, but only when the power reserve is full. As soon as it drops, the accuracy goes out the window. Then my Reverso, which is my favorite watch in the collection. It is incredibly well made, but the accuracy is horrible because it is in dire need of a service. Rolex is a more expensive and better made Seiko 5 from the 70's and 80s. You can strap it on and wear it for decades and it will do that job just as good as the day it was bought. I felt the way you feel until I bought the first one. Each one after that was the same, showing their consistency, which earned them respect with me.
@@betulaobscura Rolex has undergone some incredibly tough tests, in house, and in the field. A little research on your part would reveal that. Here and there? The Submariner was one of, if not the go to watch for divers for decades. As for accuracy, it runs at +/- 2 seconds a day. It is a tool watch that can take abuse, and be worm in pretty much any situation. The fact that it is still valued and sought after since the 1950’s, and is constantly being improved, speaks to its quality.
Update: So I successfully traded my mint green DJ41 for a brand new no date sub. And since I scored it way, wAYY under retail, the Sub basically for me is under retail (I mean... the dude does not need to know right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯). The guy wanted additional payment that came from my Pelagos 42 sell as part of my attempt to have a small collection after I had a burnout and I realized enough is enough and I must have the Sub. The timing was impeccable so I am a owner of a brand new last gen Sub. Endgame for me.
Nice watch but what really bothers me about these mechanical watches is when it doesn’t synch exactly with the atomic time yes it’s no big deal but it bothers me and also being it mechanical I’m sure it’s very fragile, please tell me otherwise. Thanks
I've been fascinated with watches almost my entire life. But I will never fully comprehend anyone spending several thousand dollars on a watch. Its beyond foolish.
@@waltwearswatches3056 I've never spent several thousand on a luxury item that cost the manufacturer a mere fraction of that amount to produce. So I'd have to disagree with your assertion.
Not necessarily foolish as long as you're aware that it's incredibly bad value. You have to be ok with giving Rolex shareholders an extra few thousands of dollars just for the little name "Rolex".
The sub is undoubtedly the most iconic watch and wears perfectly on many wrist sized
Its boring and overused
I’ve blown some serious bucks on a few wrong watch choices. Tomorrow I’m picking up my Sub. It’ll be my daily for as long as I have left on this Earth.
Edit: Picked up a new Swa Dweller 43 instead. Love it. Sub with benefits.
Very unique choice
I have been wearing my 1991 16610 since new! Never worried about it. Serviced twice in 33 years and is still worn everyday and is also +2 everyday. I can also put my old 3135 on its side every other day and gets the same result. I really can’t be arsed , it’s 14 seconds fast every Sunday when I reset and wind. It’s scratched it’s so comfortable and not heavy at all. I think it’s a little more reserved than the ceramic models and I personally like that. Nobody gives a f*’k about it and all the time I have worn it it’s never had a single comment and I have worn it to do everything, never taken off!
If you wear it everyday, why are you winding it on Sundays?
I can relate, whilst mine is only 21 years old, and in summers I swap it to a rubberb strap for comfort, makes it look like Yachtmaster. It flys under the radar. You can wear and forget. And I agree, there is no substitute.
One of the best watches ever!!
A great legacy to your child. Happy to see you still enjoy it thoroughly.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I have a Submariner Date that I purchased from an Authorized dealer in the Bahamas in 2004 for about 5k US. The wife and I just walked in off the street and bought it on a whim. I have had it service twice now (by an authorized dealer), both complete overhauls that cost over $1000.00 each time (ouch) I definitely need to start taking better care of it. It is a great watch and I wear it everyday, as such it gets pretty beat up but the good news is that when you send it for service they buff right out. Enjoy
@@mrkattm And each time they “buff it right out” the value drops more and more. Then there’s your response.. “But I don’t care about the value”
@@whereRbearsTeeth Buffing out the scratches does not drop the value if anything it increases the value because it looks and works like a new watch and it has a warranty to boot
Great video and I appreciate that you actually show the wear in detail. It’s looking good 🤙
Wear the watch, don't let the watch wear you! Great video, and glad you've been enjoying your Sub so much. I wear mine the same. I looked at it like this. When someone buys a vintage Sub, the seller will usually keep it in the used condition from the previous owner, and the buyer will typically not look to restore because of the story it tells. I chose to write mine's first story, and like you will pass it down. Keep up the fantastic work!
Very unique choice
1:19 I somehow managed to scratch the clasp of my Pelagos 39 snowflake ❄️ and BB54 within minutes of taking them out of the box 😂
Every little mark on that watch is you, something your son will appreciate.
Awesome! Love the footage you took for this. Showed great wear over the year
I really appreciate your introspective honesty about owning such a iconic watch. Cheers
I’ve had mine one year as well (white gold version). The only complaint I have is the scratches. My SS version was like yours, nothing major, but the gold sure scratches easily.
Very well said... The best part is that someday i ll pass it on to my son and he will always have a part of me with him...
thing i love about the black sub is what you said, no one notices it, barely ever. and you can wear it everywhere, everyday and it won't draw attn
I got this watch and love it! I have also had no issues
I bought one too in 2022 when this refreshed model first came out. Love the changes, especially the slimmed down lugs versus the previous model. As a lifelong Submariner fan, I think this is the perfect one. Also nice is that I then sold my first Submariner I bought new in 1997 $3500 for $8200 on eBay, and it paid for most of my new one. Kind of hard to go wrong there! If I had to sell all my watches and keep just one, this is it.
Very simple and good review; thank you.
I bought this watch, I feel the same as you do about it. My son loves it and plays with the dial, and I tell him it will be his watch one day. The most satisfying part is on the the go adjustment, every SS bracelet should have this feature, my wrist changes size throughout the day and this bracelet is amazing. I will however say, I recently have the opportunity to wear a Rolex GMT Master 2 for a week or so and the Jubiliee bracelet on that watch and the 40mm case is even more comfortable than the Sub 41. My wrist is 17.5 cm for reference. I see a GMT in my future but at the time it wasn't on my list.
Me gusta que hables de la parte emocional de un reloj, es tan importante como el reloj en si mismo. Los lazos que te unen a una pieza en concreto son personales y sin precio.
Este Rolex es un reloj magnífico pero lo es aún más porque para ti representa algo más (y en poco tiempo también para tu hijo).
Saludos desde Galicia (España) y gracias por el contenido de calidad que nos ofreces.
Gracias 👍
love the scratches! my BB58 is scratched up too. wabi sabi, beauty in decay
One of my favorite pieces, but it looks very big on your wrist
Great review, I’d love one.
Great, honest opinion, and soul sharing! Thank you.
Congratulations happy to see one year review congratulations
Looks huge
Excellent!
I got a call for the 126610 but actually wanted the classic Submariner 124060 and was surprised that they were able to accommodate for that the same day and picked it up right away. I don't mind the cyclops on some Rolex watches but having some watches with it already (DJ36 and GMTs) the symmetrical 124060 only made sense for me.
agree about the sub no date symmetry.....i have the previous model, the 114060 for several years now and still am in love with it
I def enjoy the no date as well.. it just looks timeless
Great video and review👍
Best Rolex for me. But the no date version. The purest one for me. Right now I have mint DJ41 on jubilee and I think about exchanging it for a last gen no date Sub as it is THE watch that got me into watches. And you are right - a Sub is a Sub. And if you want it, nothing will replace it.
beautiful whatch!!!
A Sea Dweller might do
THERE ARE HEAVY SCRATCHES ON THE UPPER RIGHT SIDE OF THE WATCH LOOKING LIKE SOMEBODY PURPOSLY MADE IT!
My dream is a polar white explorer2.
Where and how do i buy one
You go into a store that sells them and give them money.
I wear my "James Cameron" daily and can confirm, no one notices or cares.
Is the mug real or photoshop? It's a wonderful prop.
Haha real and custom made
👏
I hate every review video about the Submariner, because I don’t own one yet.
🤣🤣🤣👍
Did you at some point regret grabbing the date instead of no date? I am just curious, I'm just on the waiting list for the date, no problem with Cyclops at all... and I think the date will nice companion to my Exp 36. Btw, what a lovely long term review, nicely smooth. 👌
Nope, I wanted the date, as I have quite a few no date watches, including the explorer 36 😁.
Here is the thing, that cyclops has become synonymous with Rolex as most Rolex sports models have the cyclops. This also means that the watch on your wrist will be more likely to be recognized as a Rolex by people who see it.
"Nothing else will do"... Ginault enters the chat...
Yeah......no! Had both the Ocean Rover and the Silent Service, and for the money they are amazing, but no, not on the same level as the Sub
@@WatchGeek 💯
I have a no dated and I love it. From all my Rolex the Sub is my favorite watch, nothing compares to it. Thank you for the content
They are tool watches …. Wear it and don’t worry about it. It’s a watch.
Must be nice to have one.
Rolex lost me, an avid collector of precious timepieces, as a customer forever.
You seem envious and bitter.
Why does it have blue color on the cyclop? I thought it supposed to be chocolate like
I think it has something to do with AR coating, mine has it as well
How did you lose ⅓ of your weight sir?
you missed tudor phase :)
Never found Tudor "subs" attractive.
The ONE Tudor I always liked and still like is the North Flag! It didn't catch on in popularity, but it's still on my wish list
Even though it is a second hand it would be a great giveaway for 130k, thank you
you see more beaver with it than without?
How did you lose so much weight? (I could stand to lose a few pounds).
on par with atomic
get real
astrons are the only watches on par with atomic
You made it when you can afford a Sub?😅
What can I say? Right now i have a Moser on my wrist.
I understand that in terms of mechanics this is very impressive, state of the mechanical art watch but look of it is so generic. It doesn't speaks to me at all! I would mod it. True story...
Also: I would love to see some durability, accuracy tests like many watch enthusiast do with other watch brands (mostly with Casio). Lack of such tests is rather obvious answer what Rolex mostly/really is: an exclusive fashion piece, made for snobs (no offence here!) who judge their status on what they have and keep their watches in pristine condition as capital investment. I know that Rolex was used in some missions here and there but it was long time ago...
I know you are not a snob (or not bigger than typical watch collector guy - "judging" on your YT channel which I follow for quite long time, which features so many cool and beautiful watches) but I don't see any reason to feel excitement about this particular watch or spend my money on watch I don't like and its accuracy is much lower than Casio F-91W which costs 20$. It is soulless, mechanical marvel...
No offense, but why are you commenting in such a harsh way?
@@notyourtypicalwatchreview2563 Harsh? Far from it. I would say: direct, honest, straight to the point, no marketing BS etc. - yes.
Rolex is far from just a fashion piece. Yes, they are a victim of their own success which makes them a "flex" piece, but underneath that "hype" is truly one of the best mechanical watches out there, especially when it comes to toughness and durability! I have two that are 18 and 20 years old, never been serviced and both STILL keep time within 2 seconds a day, which is astonishing!! Other mechanical watches I own can't do it even when new. And another thing is consistency. They keep that time regardless of power reserve level or my way of wearing them. Something Seiko seems to struggle to achieve. I'll have a Seiko that keeps the same time because it is regulated, but only when the power reserve is full. As soon as it drops, the accuracy goes out the window.
Then my Reverso, which is my favorite watch in the collection. It is incredibly well made, but the accuracy is horrible because it is in dire need of a service.
Rolex is a more expensive and better made Seiko 5 from the 70's and 80s. You can strap it on and wear it for decades and it will do that job just as good as the day it was bought. I felt the way you feel until I bought the first one. Each one after that was the same, showing their consistency, which earned them respect with me.
@@betulaobscura Rolex has undergone some incredibly tough tests, in house, and in the field. A little research on your part would reveal that. Here and there? The Submariner was one of, if not the go to watch for divers for decades. As for accuracy, it runs at +/- 2 seconds a day. It is a tool watch that can take abuse, and be worm in pretty much any situation. The fact that it is still valued and sought after since the 1950’s, and is constantly being improved, speaks to its quality.
@@WatchGeek it’s comments like his that strengthen my resolve to buy a Rolex.
😮👍✌️
The best one I like is from Dr No, James Bond Rolex Submariner 6538.
Too much text on the dial at 6 o'clock.
Мои после года выглядят намного лучше
Update: So I successfully traded my mint green DJ41 for a brand new no date sub. And since I scored it way, wAYY under retail, the Sub basically for me is under retail (I mean... the dude does not need to know right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯). The guy wanted additional payment that came from my Pelagos 42 sell as part of my attempt to have a small collection after I had a burnout and I realized enough is enough and I must have the Sub. The timing was impeccable so I am a owner of a brand new last gen Sub. Endgame for me.
Nice watch but what really bothers me about these mechanical watches is when it doesn’t synch exactly with the atomic time yes it’s no big deal but it bothers me and also being it mechanical I’m sure it’s very fragile, please tell me otherwise. Thanks
It is literally one of the most durable watches in industry. So, no it’s not fragile😍
Had my Submariner for 20-years. It's still almost as new with no issues whatsoever and one service.
I've been fascinated with watches almost my entire life. But I will never fully comprehend anyone spending several thousand dollars on a watch. Its beyond foolish.
Im sure there’s something you spend money on that others would think was equally foolish.
@@waltwearswatches3056 I've never spent several thousand on a luxury item that cost the manufacturer a mere fraction of that amount to produce. So I'd have to disagree with your assertion.
That’s because you do not have the means to purchase one. You watched the video because you desire to own one. Don’t be a loser.
Not necessarily foolish as long as you're aware that it's incredibly bad value.
You have to be ok with giving Rolex shareholders an extra few thousands of dollars just for the little name "Rolex".
Okay “Nightmare Man”.
I got bored of mine after honeymoon period.
After 1 year of wear my Breitling Navitimer (New Model) is impeccable 3-4 classes better than Rolex 🙌🏻
Not even a pimple on the butt of a Sub! Lol! Good joke though!
😂😂😂you must be trolling
Очень много царапин... Попробуйте steeldive 1953 в следующий раз..... Там такого нет! Да, они стоят в 150 раз дешевле 😂