For anyone who didn't get the joke in the thumbnail. There's a meme where Danny Devito has a revelation and says "I finally get it." The joke of the thumbnail is that the judge finally understands that the NFA is constitutional.
I've got no faith that Trump will let this stand. We all know how he acted after 2016 when he constantly attacked the 2A via the ATF, and his ATF nominee is as milk-toast and "status quo" as they come. It's always those little decisions that broadcast what a person believes.
Hopefully with rulings like this and that other one that allowed for machine guns and with the Texas suppressor stuff and Bruen being taken into consideration with this new executive order that was signed yesterday maybe if they take historical precedents and new legal precedents into account and they are honest the attorney general may actually correct some of these laws that are directly infringing on our second amendment.
The fact that machine guns were arbitrarily restricted never made sense-especially when the 'shall not be infringed' part of the Second Amendment is pretty clear.
they only did it because the people who sell them get paid way more when there is no consumer market and it's just corrupt government kickbacks. guns they buy costs dozens of times what they're worth.
Tell that to Unconstitutional Sheriff Chad Bianco in Riverside county who's still denying law abiding citizens like me with FFL, out-of-state CCW's and no criminal history. They just don't like the hue of your skin or you religion then they can arbitrarily deny you based on Subjective Standards. Trust me. I went through it with appeal and all. The tyrant Riverside County Sheriff Department fought me all the way to deny my rights. They are horrible people at Riverside County CCW unit. Very disrespectful. In case you didn't know and you should Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco Kneeled to BLM. Do you really want a Governor who BOWED to BLM like they were his God and Kings? Look it up. Or really happened. Only Sheriff to pander to BLM and Bow Down! 🤡 Recall Chad Bianco! Unconstitutional Sheriff. Can we the People trust organizations like CRPA who do nothing for it's members and get in bed with issuing agencies like Riverside County Sheriff Department. Look it up. They have a monetary gain with the relationship and scam they are pulling on the Constituents and CRPA members! That HOT reporter on Fox News was calling all law enforcement that kneeled to BLM at all 'KNEEL TEAM 6'! 😅 I Love It! This is the same Sheriff that accused that guy from Nevada of A word against the P of the USA Blump and that guy is going to sue. All he had was a couple of pistols on the trunk and Unconstitutional Sheriff who hates the 2A put false charges on him
That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some me issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes.
1920s (Prohibition) the gov caught on to ppl skirting it by getting industrial alcohol (which at time hadn't been denatured ever)...so THE FED GOV poisoned LARGE batches of industrial alcohol w/ turpines, methyl alcohol (wood alcohol, stuff that causes blindness), and more deadly stuff. FACT: They mur-dered 10k+ ppl doing this (some est say up to 30k ish), they knew denaturing it would kill them, and they were 'happy' to see those ppl removed. NOTE: At time alcohol possession was misdemeanor at best, you got a fine...So they all died for something that may have been a $20-200 fine.
HEY NAGR, contact whoever your bois are in DC, tell the WE want Brandon Herrera for ATF Director!! NO COPS! Brandon legitimately has the qualifications, knowledge, skills, and abilities for the job. From my understanding, this is a time sensitive message.
The 2nd Amendment details the rights of the people to possess militia "weapons" and therefore, ANY firearm should be 100% lawful... we the people should be allowed to posses any and all "military style firearms"...
You got to look at what he said it was legal to possess a machine gun in your home which is fine that that's the first step. Hopefully with the new executive order attorney general was told to re-examine all of these laws and correct the ones that are unconstitutional. Besides that Mississippi machine gun ruling there was another machine gun ruling and you had Texas suppressor, bruen if they are honest and go off a historical and legal precedence almost all of these bans are going to be vacated
I'm still looking for the clause in the second amendment that allows government to infringe on the right to keep and bear "Dangerous and Unusual" arms.
First, I'm all for the 2A, all of it. But you asked an interesting question. Suppose you could somehow create a gun that holds 9mm rounds, but the effect of each round would be similar to a mortar shell. Would that be "Dangerous and Unusual"? Even if those words are not in the Constitution, they are still a part of our decisional law in Heller and also in the stun gun case. If the founders had such technology, would they have permitted it for regular use?
@@daffidavit Ask yourself why the founders said the right to arms shall not be infringed? No type of arms specified, ALL types of arms. The English Bill of Rights of 1689 said there is a right to such arms allowed by law. The Americans saw this was wide open for abuse of the right by government (simply outlaw all arms) effectively making it a privilege so the changed it to shall not be infringed. The 2A does not say the right to arms shall not be infringed except if they are dangerous or unusual. BTW, all weapons are dangerous, making the dangerous test a true danger to our 2A rights. The dangerous and unusual test was pulled out of thin air, it has no basis in the text of the 2A.
@@Anon54387 1870 12G remminton shotgun's vs M16-1A the shotgun does more damages and or looking at emu hunt's/historically the shotgun is less-sporting and saying that actually isn't in my favour as i like the brown-bess1750 and 1880's model21 Winchester SxS shotgun so ironic that the m16 in 22/25acp-cal using clay-rounds is more sporting than my 10G or 12G leaded-rounds duck-hunting
It makes no sense whatsoever that it is an as applied ruling. A ruling like that flat out should be applied to all seeing as it is absolutely unconstitutional.
4:34 "text, history, and tradition" test is complete arbitrary BS, but if they really wanna go down that road.... The original text is plain enough for a 5 YO to read and understand(from the 1780's), There was/is NO American arms laws/ rules/ traditions/ or history older than the ratification of the 2A..... Oh yeah, the supremacy clause, and the 10A.... just a couple of cherries on top. So if THAT'S the test they want to go with, all laws, rules, and regulations need to be repealed back to the ratification date.
AR15's are not machine guns, nor are they assault weapons, this applies to the AK47 rifle and all it's variants. The 2nd Amendment protects machine guns for civilian ownership to protect against criminals and a tyrannical government.
There is no such thing as assault weapons, only a completely made TF up term used by Democrat Media and Democrat politicians. It's not in common use, so stop trying to Johnny Appleseed Democrat terminology on the rest of us.
There needs to be changes to the oath these breakers take. They should be forced to read the bill of right aloud and swear the oath to uphold that version of it not their own personal rendition of it!! The words are pretty clear. Shall not be infringed…
In 5th Circuit ruling negative to suppressors we see same lack of manhood to do what is right to follow the text of the 2nd Amendment. This case however a judge had the honesty to actually follow the Supreme Law of the Constitution, something SCOTUS should apply if they develop actual courage. Below is thought or fact of the 5th Circuit. Bravo to a real judge that ruled correctly regarding full auto ARMS expounded upon in this video. The 5th Circuit has obviously gone stupid, any idiot would know that the 2nd Amendment guarantees THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Accessories such as (Suppressors) are also integral parts of ARMS, that is its soul purpose, and protected by the 2nd Amendment. A RIGHT CAN NOT BE REGULATED LEGALLY or it ceases to be a RIGHT. Factually among thinking individuals, any gun restriction laws are unConstitutional on their face merit, by being contradictory to the BILL OF RIGHTS 2nd Amendment which is a Supreme Law of the United States of America, and not slave to non Constitution laws. - The 2nd Amendment of The United States of America - “A well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state; the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to Keep and Bear ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”. (Infringed = Regulated, Hindered) (Well Regulated = Well Disciplined and Well Trained Militia (1791)) Restricting, regulating, infringing a RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE is not only unAmerican, but is unConstitutional.
Look at the clear words of the 2nd amendment then look at existing gun laws and the fact there is now a thing called the ATF. Now what were you saying about us trusting the government?? There needs to be changes to the oath these breakers take. They should be forced to read the bill of right aloud and swear the oath to uphold that version of it, not their own personal rendition of it!! The words are pretty clear. Shall not be infringed…
Much appreciation for this madam host and her narration, both the style and the substance, makes it easier and pleasant for a non law and average intelligence joe like myself, to understand. Thank you. 🇺🇸🤠🙏🏼🤟🏼👏🏼👍🏼
8:33 there's no "interpretation".... It's a legally binding document.... The day it was signed is the only day for which definitions are acceptable, and how the signers understood, what they were signing.... period, the end.... If you sign a mortgage today, you nor the bank, nor anyone can reinterpret it or redefine meanings in 20 years..... otherwise NO legal documents have ever, nor will ever have any weight.
Excuse my ignorance, but why does this ruling only apply to this person? If it’s unconstitutional for one person, it’s unconstitutional for everyone. No one is above the law. Equal protection under the law.
I reached out to ever 2A organization and they did nothing for me! Here's what's up! I am about to sue Riverside County and California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme in Federal Court. I was denied my CCW after appeal and I'm an FFL, I have an out-of-state CCW, I'm a range safety officer, I'm well trained, no drug or mental health history, and i can buy firearms and pass a NICS background check. I also have a letter from the DOJ and NICS saying i can Buy, possess and carry firearms but since Chad Bianco and his CCW unit didn't like me for whatever reason my right to carry is now infringed based on Arbitrary Rules and Subjective Standards against The Bruen decision and other SCOTUS rulings. I was told my case is a winner but i just need to find an attorney who is willing to start this with me. I asked AI if Riverside County CCW scheme was Unconstitutional. This is what it said....... The key question revolves around whether Riverside County’s CCW scheme complies with constitutional standards post-Bruen. The Supreme Court emphasized that rights protected by the Second Amendment should not require individuals to demonstrate special needs or burdensome criteria imposed by state or local governments. Good Cause Requirement: The requirement for applicants to show “good cause” is now viewed as overly restrictive and likely unconstitutional based on the precedent set by Bruen. This suggests that any similar requirement in Riverside County would face significant legal challenges. Subjective Criteria: The use of subjective assessments regarding an applicant’s moral character raises further concerns about constitutionality. Legal experts have pointed out that such criteria could lead to arbitrary decisions and discrimination against certain groups of people. Recent Injunctions: The permanent injunction against discouraging non-citizens from applying indicates judicial recognition of broader access rights under the Second Amendment, which may extend to all lawful residents regardless of citizenship status. Given these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that aspects of Riverside County’s CCW scheme are indeed unconstitutional as they conflict with both the spirit and letter of recent Supreme Court rulings regarding gun rights. Conclusion Based on these considerations, the Riverside County CCW scheme is likely unconstitutional, particularly concerning its previous requirements for demonstrating good cause and other subjective assessments related to moral character. That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some CCW issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes. To prove my point if you're a Riverside County Resident who was denied contact CRPA and ask them to start a case against Riverside County or to file a Writ of Mandate and they will turn you down. Why did they choose to sue Los Angeles and refuse to sue Riverside? Too much money being made. Look it up. Earlier this year Riverside County Sheriff held a CCW Symposium and guess who was to benefit from all the money made at the event? You guessed it, CRPA!!! This is a conflict of interest for CRPA members paying dues in Riverside. We don't want our 2A organizations to be in bed with Tyrants for monetary gain. CRPA only opens cases that will make them and their president Michele and Associates money because they open cases and drag them out to milk the organizations money from Donations. it's a grift and a money grab. I'll prove you don't have to pay lease fees, salaries, dinners and parties to change laws. We the PEOPLE can start lawsuits and save Billions of dollars! In case you didn't know and you should Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco Kneeled to BLM. Do you really want a Governor who BOWED to BLM like they were his God and Kings? Look it up. Or really happened. Only Sheriff to pander to BLM and Bow Down! 🤡 Recall Chad Bianco! Unconstitutional Sheriff. Can we the People trust organizations like CRPA who do nothing for it's members and get in bed with issuing agencies like Riverside County Sheriff Department. Look it up. They have a monetary gain with the relationship and scam they are pulling on the Constituents and CRPA members! That HOT reporter on Fox News was calling all law enforcement that kneeled to BLM at all 'KNEEL TEAM 6'! 😅 I Love It! This is the same Sheriff that accused that guy from Nevada of A word against the P of the USA Blump and that guy is going to sue. All he had was a couple of pistols on the trunk and Unconstitutional Sheriff who hates the 2A put false charges on him.
He didn’t really “defend” it. He simply said (paraphrasing) the latest rulings from the US Supreme Court doesn’t give wiggle room. He later went on to say (again paraphrasing) that later The Court may change its decision, but for now we must abide by what is deemed law.
The way he wrote it was clearly to make the weakest possible case, in hopes he gets overturned at the 5th Circuit appellate level, *undercutting* Bruen because of his (intentionally) poor reasoning of Bruen. This is *not* a good ruling for us - it is poisoned bait.
@@geodkyt, in order to subscribe to that, you would first have to know that the losing party is indeed going to challenge it. Seeing that it applies only to the one person and not everybody else, I doubt they’ll appeal it because they may not be ready to expose their arguments in higher courts and risk the application exploding the issue. It seems it is much simpler for a single person to continue on his path while everybody else remains constrained since nobody else can go out and buy them. Law abiding citizens are just that, law abiding. I can’t foresee, first of all, some FFL beginning to stock up and hold inventory that they’re not going to be able to sell except to one man. On that point, neither do I see individuals being able to go out and purchase them simply as a means to start this ball rolling because they wouldn’t be able to get one anyways. No, I suspect they’re gonna let it ride and buy their time until such as they can gain control of the U.S. Supreme Court and throw out it’s previous decision much like what happened with Roe v Wade (one court changes a ruling from a previous court).
voted for you in the Gundies. Because you are so good at breaking the geeky stuff down so that anyone can understand the topic. Thank you for your dedication and determination.
Thank you good analysis. The bill of rights was written because of the lack of trust in the government. The constitution was signed by several states woth a stipulation that the bill of rights would be written soon.😊
So machine guns are actually already legal to own.. They just have to be manufactured and registered prior to 1986.. It’s newly manufactured machine guns that are illegal to register and own.. A supreme court ruling based on this decision would not necessarily strike down the NFA
So glad to read your comment. I was thinking I missed something. I thought the machine gun ban was the 10 year period of no new imports only. Lawyers suck.
The "dangerous and unusual" argument should fall in the "can't be used" category as every single one of the guns they want banned was at one point or another "unusual" and by default "dangerous".
The only compromise I'm willing to accept right now is MG ban drops but still requires NFA and SBRs and cans are tossed out of the NFA. Scotus should be able to stomach that.
The 5th Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana.. just ruled that silencers, are not bearable arms and therefore are not covered under the 2nd Amendment. So, does that mean that they can't be regulated under the NFA..?
the total annihilation of all the machinegun bans, and any such types, are the only NFA infringing laws, court cases, and restrictions. I am concerned about, at the moment. then when that is annihilated and we get our machinegun rights back. then and only then, will I start caring about other such NFA infringements. there is allot of infringements, that one is just top of my list. (it's childhood personal)!
The Cargill decision highlighted the fact that ROF has zero bearing on what a machine gun is legally defined as. So how can a court uphold the prohibition on machine guns without factoring ROF. All firearms are capable of firing fast, machine guns just fire fast with zero trigger movement between shots.
Judge finally done his job viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant if judges do this Accross the nation nobody will ever be convicted of possessing a firearm again
" Unusual " holds no factual muster. Every single new firearm technology is unusual for a brief period. Almost no operational modern firearm uses strictly and only technology from 1791. All of this is, by definition. "Infringement"!
This man has standing to sue against the nfa and get it repealed idk what kind of defendant he is but he’s the first man who can legitimately stand against it in a very long time that no judge can rule has no standing
I NEED LEGAL HELP!... I have had my 2nd Amendment rights removed, even though I have never committed a crime or had any interaction with law enforcement! Local law enforcement made a decision based on false claims and refuse to look at the evidence, my attorney has failed to make a single action and it's almost been 2 years. Everyone is ignoring me... my attorney will not even return my correspondence. I don't know what to do. I'm a veteran with an absolutely spotless record, I do not use drugs, I'm not even on medication of any kind!
3:33 If you REALLY want to go with the reason and context in which the 2A was written and ratified, if would be more constitutional if ONLY military arms could be owned by civilians, and non-military arms were restricted and banned, than would be the reverse(currently where we find ourselves).
🔴. President Trump Please we the people need an Executive Order acknowledging the Second Amendment Preemption and the Supremacy Clause = NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY, Thank You Sir ! No more Licenses or Permits ! TEXT and HISTORICAL TRADITION ! - Justice Clarence Thomas
If they use north Hampton they they must prove that the person intended to terrorize the public. How do they do that? Can they read minds? Show proof of the intentions.
Technically, the real term for a machine gun is a electric operated motor firearm like those that you see on warships the operate like machines not an auto sear Machine guns and chain guns both operate electronically, so technically dropping an auto seer inside a firearm is not the term “ machine gun “ sadly you will still be charged for owning a machine gun.
For anyone who didn't get the joke in the thumbnail. There's a meme where Danny Devito has a revelation and says "I finally get it." The joke of the thumbnail is that the judge finally understands that the NFA is constitutional.
Did you mean unconstitutional?
I've got no faith that Trump will let this stand. We all know how he acted after 2016 when he constantly attacked the 2A via the ATF, and his ATF nominee is as milk-toast and "status quo" as they come. It's always those little decisions that broadcast what a person believes.
Hopefully with rulings like this and that other one that allowed for machine guns and with the Texas suppressor stuff and Bruen being taken into consideration with this new executive order that was signed yesterday maybe if they take historical precedents and new legal precedents into account and they are honest the attorney general may actually correct some of these laws that are directly infringing on our second amendment.
You say, "National Foundation for Gun Rights" in your open??
Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA!
The fact that machine guns were arbitrarily restricted never made sense-especially when the 'shall not be infringed' part of the Second Amendment is pretty clear.
they only did it because the people who sell them get paid way more when there is no consumer market and it's just corrupt government kickbacks. guns they buy costs dozens of times what they're worth.
It worked in the pre-Bruen balancing test method. Post-Bruen blows arms restrictions out of the water.
Tell that to Unconstitutional Sheriff Chad Bianco in Riverside county who's still denying law abiding citizens like me with FFL, out-of-state CCW's and no criminal history. They just don't like the hue of your skin or you religion then they can arbitrarily deny you based on Subjective Standards. Trust me. I went through it with appeal and all. The tyrant Riverside County Sheriff Department fought me all the way to deny my rights. They are horrible people at Riverside County CCW unit. Very disrespectful. In case you didn't know and you should Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco Kneeled to BLM. Do you really want a Governor who BOWED to BLM like they were his God and Kings? Look it up. Or really happened. Only Sheriff to pander to BLM and Bow Down! 🤡 Recall Chad Bianco! Unconstitutional Sheriff. Can we the People trust organizations like CRPA who do nothing for it's members and get in bed with issuing agencies like Riverside County Sheriff Department. Look it up. They have a monetary gain with the relationship and scam they are pulling on the Constituents and CRPA members! That HOT reporter on Fox News was calling all law enforcement that kneeled to BLM at all 'KNEEL TEAM 6'! 😅 I Love It! This is the same Sheriff that accused that guy from Nevada of A word against the P of the USA Blump and that guy is going to sue. All he had was a couple of pistols on the trunk and Unconstitutional Sheriff who hates the 2A put false charges on him
That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some me issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes.
1920s (Prohibition) the gov caught on to ppl skirting it by getting industrial alcohol (which at time hadn't been denatured ever)...so THE FED GOV poisoned LARGE batches of industrial alcohol w/ turpines, methyl alcohol (wood alcohol, stuff that causes blindness), and more deadly stuff.
FACT: They mur-dered 10k+ ppl doing this (some est say up to 30k ish), they knew denaturing it would kill them, and they were 'happy' to see those ppl removed.
NOTE: At time alcohol possession was misdemeanor at best, you got a fine...So they all died for something that may have been a $20-200 fine.
Repeel the NFA!
"repeal" dropout.
He went to law school at Costco...
Gotta peel before you can repeel... just sayin
Using the Bruin test every gun law on the books is unconstitutional including permitting
HEY NAGR, contact whoever your bois are in DC, tell the WE want Brandon Herrera for ATF Director!! NO COPS! Brandon legitimately has the qualifications, knowledge, skills, and abilities for the job. From my understanding, this is a time sensitive message.
absolutely a guru for the job
Half of that first sentence made me laugh.
The 2nd Amendment details the rights of the people to possess militia "weapons" and therefore, ANY firearm should be 100% lawful... we the people should be allowed to posses any and all "military style firearms"...
all gun laws are infringements.
Yes,. repeal the NFA
And the ATF
If the machine Gun band can't be enforced on Him, it cannot be enforced on us
✨️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨️
You got to look at what he said it was legal to possess a machine gun in your home which is fine that that's the first step. Hopefully with the new executive order attorney general was told to re-examine all of these laws and correct the ones that are unconstitutional. Besides that Mississippi machine gun ruling there was another machine gun ruling and you had Texas suppressor, bruen if they are honest and go off a historical and legal precedence almost all of these bans are going to be vacated
Equal protection under the law !
Repeal NFA
I'm still looking for the clause in the second amendment that allows government to infringe on the right to keep and bear "Dangerous and Unusual" arms.
They'll say it's baby steps.
Wait around another 75 years and they might "allow" those.
First, I'm all for the 2A, all of it. But you asked an interesting question. Suppose you could somehow create a gun that holds 9mm rounds, but the effect of each round would be similar to a mortar shell. Would that be "Dangerous and Unusual"? Even if those words are not in the Constitution, they are still a part of our decisional law in Heller and also in the stun gun case. If the founders had such technology, would they have permitted it for regular use?
@@daffidavit Ask yourself why the founders said the right to arms shall not be infringed? No type of arms specified, ALL types of arms. The English Bill of Rights of 1689 said there is a right to such arms allowed by law. The Americans saw this was wide open for abuse of the right by government (simply outlaw all arms) effectively making it a privilege so the changed it to shall not be infringed.
The 2A does not say the right to arms shall not be infringed except if they are dangerous or unusual. BTW, all weapons are dangerous, making the dangerous test a true danger to our 2A rights. The dangerous and unusual test was pulled out of thin air, it has no basis in the text of the 2A.
@@Anon54387 1870 12G remminton shotgun's vs M16-1A the shotgun does more damages and or looking at emu hunt's/historically the shotgun is less-sporting and saying that actually isn't in my favour as i like the brown-bess1750 and 1880's model21 Winchester SxS shotgun
so ironic that the m16 in 22/25acp-cal using clay-rounds is more sporting than my 10G or 12G leaded-rounds duck-hunting
@@Anon54387 Agreed, but the S.C. has now made the term a part of our decisional "law". So, for now, we have to live with it.
So, Mr. Brown can have a "machine gun" in his home, but nowhere else.
It makes no sense whatsoever that it is an as applied ruling. A ruling like that flat out should be applied to all seeing as it is absolutely unconstitutional.
I have zero trust in government, and zero trust in the officers of the law.
An infringement is the breaking of the agreement of the law. Everyone of them are criminals.
I would rather keep myself safe.
If it works for him, why not us? What about “liberty and justice for all “??
Yes It’s O.K. For one guy just not everyone else!! And that makes sense How ???😮😮😮😮
So call smart people can't comprehend:
" SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED:
Buy dictionaries for all.
4:34 "text, history, and tradition" test is complete arbitrary BS, but if they really wanna go down that road.... The original text is plain enough for a 5 YO to read and understand(from the 1780's), There was/is NO American arms laws/ rules/ traditions/ or history older than the ratification of the 2A..... Oh yeah, the supremacy clause, and the 10A.... just a couple of cherries on top. So if THAT'S the test they want to go with, all laws, rules, and regulations need to be repealed back to the ratification date.
My dumbass thought that was Danny DeVito.
01:50 I love how you correctly call it a “standard capacity magazine ban” instead of a “high” capacity magazine ban. 👏👏
A judge that actually read the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution? It's about time.
Thanks for everything you do, Hannah
AR15's are not machine guns, nor are they assault weapons, this applies to the AK47 rifle and all it's variants. The 2nd Amendment protects machine guns for civilian ownership to protect against criminals and a tyrannical government.
Assault Weapon is a nebulous term used to scare those ignorant about firearms.
There is no such thing as assault weapons, only a completely made TF up term used by Democrat Media and Democrat politicians. It's not in common use, so stop trying to Johnny Appleseed Democrat terminology on the rest of us.
There needs to be changes to the oath these breakers take. They should be forced to read the bill of right aloud and swear the oath to uphold that version of it not their own personal rendition of it!! The words are pretty clear. Shall not be infringed…
You would think that this would go to show Colorado assault weapons ban known as semiautomatic firearms ban as being unconstitutional
Wonder who decided it was a good idea to go after this guy, only to end up just creating more case law in favor of The Peoples' rights? 😂
I need someone to clarify "Dangerous and Unusual" and cites Blackstone. When you read Blackstone it READS "Dangerous or Unusual".
Great job explaining this. Thank you.
Thanks for the hard work! I'm a very proud member!
Repeal NFA!!🎉🎉
In 5th Circuit ruling negative to suppressors we see same lack of manhood to do what is right to follow the text of the 2nd Amendment. This case however a judge had the honesty to actually follow the Supreme Law of the Constitution, something SCOTUS should apply if they develop actual courage. Below is thought or fact of the 5th Circuit. Bravo to a real judge that ruled correctly regarding full auto ARMS expounded upon in this video.
The 5th Circuit has obviously gone stupid, any idiot would know that the 2nd Amendment guarantees THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Accessories such as (Suppressors) are also integral parts of ARMS, that is its soul purpose, and protected by the 2nd Amendment. A RIGHT CAN NOT BE REGULATED LEGALLY or it ceases to be a RIGHT. Factually among thinking individuals, any gun restriction laws are unConstitutional on their face merit, by being contradictory to the BILL OF RIGHTS 2nd Amendment which is a Supreme Law of the United States of America, and not slave to non Constitution laws.
- The 2nd Amendment of The United States of America -
“A well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state; the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to Keep and Bear ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”. (Infringed = Regulated, Hindered) (Well Regulated = Well Disciplined and Well Trained Militia (1791))
Restricting, regulating, infringing a RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE is not only unAmerican, but is unConstitutional.
Repeal GCA
Look at the clear words of the 2nd amendment then look at existing gun laws and the fact there is now a thing called the ATF. Now what were you saying about us trusting the government?? There needs to be changes to the oath these breakers take. They should be forced to read the bill of right aloud and swear the oath to uphold that version of it, not their own personal rendition of it!! The words are pretty clear. Shall not be infringed…
It's a step in the right direction.
Thanks!
Much appreciation for this madam host and her narration, both the style and the substance, makes it easier and pleasant for a non law and average intelligence joe like myself, to understand.
Thank you.
🇺🇸🤠🙏🏼🤟🏼👏🏼👍🏼
8:33 there's no "interpretation".... It's a legally binding document.... The day it was signed is the only day for which definitions are acceptable, and how the signers understood, what they were signing.... period, the end.... If you sign a mortgage today, you nor the bank, nor anyone can reinterpret it or redefine meanings in 20 years..... otherwise NO legal documents have ever, nor will ever have any weight.
Excuse my ignorance, but why does this ruling only apply to this person?
If it’s unconstitutional for one person, it’s unconstitutional for everyone.
No one is above the law.
Equal protection under the law.
"That would be a startling reading..."
Well, get startled, skrub!
This! 💯
Very interesting. Thank you for keeping us in the know!
"We the People" cannot trust the Government........... Period..........
Permission from our employees, they work for us.They are not our overlords
Great video, thanks
Seems to me the judge likely made this decision to move the issue on toward SCOTUS...
Put her in jail for leaking voting machine passwords!
If ONE MORE PERSON says I look like Jena Griswold lol
I reached out to ever 2A organization and they did nothing for me! Here's what's up! I am about to sue Riverside County and California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme in Federal Court. I was denied my CCW after appeal and I'm an FFL, I have an out-of-state CCW, I'm a range safety officer, I'm well trained, no drug or mental health history, and i can buy firearms and pass a NICS background check. I also have a letter from the DOJ and NICS saying i can Buy, possess and carry firearms but since Chad Bianco and his CCW unit didn't like me for whatever reason my right to carry is now infringed based on Arbitrary Rules and Subjective Standards against The Bruen decision and other SCOTUS rulings. I was told my case is a winner but i just need to find an attorney who is willing to start this with me.
I asked AI if Riverside County CCW scheme was Unconstitutional. This is what it said.......
The key question revolves around whether Riverside County’s CCW scheme complies with constitutional standards post-Bruen. The Supreme Court emphasized that rights protected by the Second Amendment should not require individuals to demonstrate special needs or burdensome criteria imposed by state or local governments.
Good Cause Requirement: The requirement for applicants to show “good cause” is now viewed as overly restrictive and likely unconstitutional based on the precedent set by Bruen. This suggests that any similar requirement in Riverside County would face significant legal challenges.
Subjective Criteria: The use of subjective assessments regarding an applicant’s moral character raises further concerns about constitutionality. Legal experts have pointed out that such criteria could lead to arbitrary decisions and discrimination against certain groups of people.
Recent Injunctions: The permanent injunction against discouraging non-citizens from applying indicates judicial recognition of broader access rights under the Second Amendment, which may extend to all lawful residents regardless of citizenship status.
Given these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that aspects of Riverside County’s CCW scheme are indeed unconstitutional as they conflict with both the spirit and letter of recent Supreme Court rulings regarding gun rights.
Conclusion
Based on these considerations, the Riverside County CCW scheme is likely unconstitutional, particularly concerning its previous requirements for demonstrating good cause and other subjective assessments related to moral character.
That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some CCW issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes.
To prove my point if you're a Riverside County Resident who was denied contact CRPA and ask them to start a case against Riverside County or to file a Writ of Mandate and they will turn you down. Why did they choose to sue Los Angeles and refuse to sue Riverside? Too much money being made. Look it up. Earlier this year Riverside County Sheriff held a CCW Symposium and guess who was to benefit from all the money made at the event? You guessed it, CRPA!!! This is a conflict of interest for CRPA members paying dues in Riverside. We don't want our 2A organizations to be in bed with Tyrants for monetary gain. CRPA only opens cases that will make them and their president Michele and Associates money because they open cases and drag them out to milk the organizations money from Donations. it's a grift and a money grab. I'll prove you don't have to pay lease fees, salaries, dinners and parties to change laws. We the PEOPLE can start lawsuits and save Billions of dollars! In case you didn't know and you should Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco Kneeled to BLM. Do you really want a Governor who BOWED to BLM like they were his God and Kings? Look it up. Or really happened. Only Sheriff to pander to BLM and Bow Down! 🤡 Recall Chad Bianco! Unconstitutional Sheriff. Can we the People trust organizations like CRPA who do nothing for it's members and get in bed with issuing agencies like Riverside County Sheriff Department. Look it up. They have a monetary gain with the relationship and scam they are pulling on the Constituents and CRPA members! That HOT reporter on Fox News was calling all law enforcement that kneeled to BLM at all 'KNEEL TEAM 6'! 😅 I Love It! This is the same Sheriff that accused that guy from Nevada of A word against the P of the USA Blump and that guy is going to sue. All he had was a couple of pistols on the trunk and Unconstitutional Sheriff who hates the 2A put false charges on him.
it's always about money
Leave that state go to a red state. Good luck to you.
He didn’t really “defend” it. He simply said (paraphrasing) the latest rulings from the US Supreme Court doesn’t give wiggle room.
He later went on to say (again paraphrasing) that later The Court may change its decision, but for now we must abide by what is deemed law.
The way he wrote it was clearly to make the weakest possible case, in hopes he gets overturned at the 5th Circuit appellate level, *undercutting* Bruen because of his (intentionally) poor reasoning of Bruen.
This is *not* a good ruling for us - it is poisoned bait.
@@geodkyt, in order to subscribe to that, you would first have to know that the losing party is indeed going to challenge it.
Seeing that it applies only to the one person and not everybody else, I doubt they’ll appeal it because they may not be ready to expose their arguments in higher courts and risk the application exploding the issue.
It seems it is much simpler for a single person to continue on his path while everybody else remains constrained since nobody else can go out and buy them.
Law abiding citizens are just that, law abiding. I can’t foresee, first of all, some FFL beginning to stock up and hold inventory that they’re not going to be able to sell except to one man. On that point, neither do I see individuals being able to go out and purchase them simply as a means to start this ball rolling because they wouldn’t be able to get one anyways.
No, I suspect they’re gonna let it ride and buy their time until such as they can gain control of the U.S. Supreme Court and throw out it’s previous decision much like what happened with Roe v Wade (one court changes a ruling from a previous court).
Nothing will come of this when the Supreme Court will not even address the AW Ban or Mag Ban issue.
How is our right that “shall not be infringed”. Is the right the government wants to take away the most
Howdy All ! ! !
voted for you in the Gundies. Because you are so good at breaking the geeky stuff down so that anyone can understand the topic. Thank you for your dedication and determination.
I appreciate that so much!!
Please help us in NY.
Brandon Herrera for ATF Director!
Thank you good analysis. The bill of rights was written because of the lack of trust in the government. The constitution was signed by several states woth a stipulation that the bill of rights would be written soon.😊
Thank you!
So machine guns are actually already legal to own.. They just have to be manufactured and registered prior to 1986.. It’s newly manufactured machine guns that are illegal to register and own.. A supreme court ruling based on this decision would not necessarily strike down the NFA
So glad to read your comment. I was thinking I missed something. I thought the machine gun ban was the 10 year period of no new imports only. Lawyers suck.
Any gun restrictions on any gun or arm is an infringement.
Thank you
Even the lawmakers who wrote the NFA agreed that the banning of machine guns would be unconstitutional, which is why a tax system was implemented.
Chicago is here ✊🏾💪🏾✊🏾 salute 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
The "dangerous and unusual" argument should fall in the "can't be used" category as every single one of the guns they want banned was at one point or another "unusual" and by default "dangerous".
Excellent analysis Hannah! If only ALL the judiciary had your thought processes.
Excellent reporting, please file against the 1968GCA.
This hardly seems legal. How can one person be granted a Right that isn’t available to every citizen? Isn’t this a violation of the 14th Amendment?
Perhaps the DOJ should bring an apeal..... then concede that this defense is correct.
The only compromise I'm willing to accept right now is MG ban drops but still requires NFA and SBRs and cans are tossed out of the NFA. Scotus should be able to stomach that.
If it can't be enforced against him it can't be enforced against anyone.
The 5th Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana.. just ruled that silencers, are not bearable arms and therefore are not covered under the 2nd Amendment. So, does that mean that they can't be regulated under the NFA..?
the total annihilation of all the machinegun bans, and any such types, are the only NFA infringing laws, court cases, and restrictions. I am concerned about, at the moment. then when that is annihilated and we get our machinegun rights back. then and only then, will I start caring about other such NFA infringements. there is allot of infringements, that one is just top of my list. (it's childhood personal)!
The Cargill decision highlighted the fact that ROF has zero bearing on what a machine gun is legally defined as. So how can a court uphold the prohibition on machine guns without factoring ROF. All firearms are capable of firing fast, machine guns just fire fast with zero trigger movement between shots.
Judge finally done his job viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant if judges do this Accross the nation nobody will ever be convicted of possessing a firearm again
These are the only NAGRs I like.
" Unusual " holds no factual muster. Every single new firearm technology is unusual for a brief period. Almost no operational modern firearm uses strictly and only technology from 1791. All of this is, by definition. "Infringement"!
With what I've heard of our new AG, it might be possible that she appeal the case up to the Supreme Court
This man has standing to sue against the nfa and get it repealed idk what kind of defendant he is but he’s the first man who can legitimately stand against it in a very long time that no judge can rule has no standing
I NEED LEGAL HELP!... I have had my 2nd Amendment rights removed, even though I have never committed a crime or had any interaction with law enforcement! Local law enforcement made a decision based on false claims and refuse to look at the evidence, my attorney has failed to make a single action and it's almost been 2 years. Everyone is ignoring me... my attorney will not even return my correspondence. I don't know what to do. I'm a veteran with an absolutely spotless record, I do not use drugs, I'm not even on medication of any kind!
REPEAL THE NFA!
No arm should be out of bound
Wish he had granted to everyone and not just the defendant
No; the judge was engaged in malicious compliance.
That’s my suspicion too, frankly.
3:33 If you REALLY want to go with the reason and context in which the 2A was written and ratified, if would be more constitutional if ONLY military arms could be owned by civilians, and non-military arms were restricted and banned, than would be the reverse(currently where we find ourselves).
🔴. President Trump Please we the people need an Executive Order acknowledging the Second Amendment Preemption and the Supremacy Clause = NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY, Thank You Sir !
No more Licenses or Permits !
TEXT and HISTORICAL TRADITION ! - Justice Clarence Thomas
If the government could use it against the people, then the People have the right to own the same arms.
If they use north Hampton they they must prove that the person intended to terrorize the public. How do they do that? Can they read minds? Show proof of the intentions.
Nice job!
Applied challenge seems at odds with equal justice under the law.
So what you're telling me is I only need to move to dismiss charges in the event I get caught with NFA items without the appropriate tax stamps?
When will the 5th circuit rule on FRTs?
Probably some time in the next couple of weeks. Stay tuned!
@hannahhill2781 thank you!
Lovely, lets get the cans off the nfa and make them available like car mufflers!👏👏👏🔥🔥🔥🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
If the NFA does not apply to HIM then it does not apply to ANYONE under the 14th amendment, equal protection clause
Every weapon is dangerous, everything can be used as a weapon.
I don't trust The Bondie lady
I do like this... also...
"Make Ammo Cheap Again"
Repeal Hughes amendment
the statute of northampton cannot be used as a historical analogue, it's not an american law.
The supreme court said so is an authority fallacy & they don't get to rewrite the bor
This judge only came to this ruling out of sarcasm.
We need to hear it from the US Congress and US Senit thy need very clearly defend the Second Amendment so Ms. Bundie can di her Job
Technically, the real term for a machine gun is a electric operated motor firearm like those that you see on warships the operate like machines not an auto sear
Machine guns and chain guns both operate electronically, so technically dropping an auto seer inside a firearm is not the term “ machine gun “ sadly you will still be charged for owning a machine gun.
you'd be correct, to be a machine of any sorts it must meet certain criteria.
All guns with moving parts are actually machines.
How can a law only apply to one person?
Equal application of the law is supposed to be a basic tenet of our culture.