Microcontrast is unbelieavalbe on the 56 Fuji - 10% above Sigma. Clean and clear like fresh water - smooth at the same time. Look at the richness of skin tones. The Sigma as any Sigma I own with a fantastic result, but the topping on the Fuji reminds me my GF Lenses. Absolut fantastic.
you did a phenomenal job recreating the same composition with both lenses. Most comparisons just have similar shots while you had pretty much the exact same in all of them except the walking one! this is great, please do more. i actually had the sigma when i shot Sony, but made the switch to Fuji in part because of the f1.2. even though the depth of field is only marginally shallower, it really shines in some photos (like at 1:34)
Thank you so much. I tried my best to match each image in camera as closley as possible. I'm glad it's noticeable. Yeah I really REALLY love the Fujifilm 56. Overall it seemed sharper and the Dof is really nice. Also the fall off is to die for. Thanks for watching and I'm glad you enjoyed it.
With such a wide f1.2 aperture, highlights are brighter whereas the f1.4 was subtly less bright. Amazing both lenses performed about the same from my viewpoint. Thx!!
You and the model both did an astonishing job recreating the same image with each lens! Really great comparison. Based on these shots, I think I'll save myself $520 and get the Sigma. To my eyes the differences weren't consistent enough to pick a clear favorite, so I'm happy to take the affordable option. I'd like to have an aperture ring, but if I'm honest with myself I'm gonna lock the aperture at 1.4 most of the time. Edit: Maybe one consistent exception in the skin tone where the Fuji has a slight edge for me: I think skin tones (oranges, I guess) are rendered slightly lighter, making the skin look smoother overall. Normally I'd create that effect with the HSL panel in Lightroom. Definitely not a big enough difference to make me spend the extra money.
Such great shots and the best comparison video I have ever seen with the shots being identical, side by side, entartaining, and no dumb pixel peeping. Keep them coming.
Used to have the sigma 56mm e mount when I had my Sony A6500, fantastic lens with great af and image quality. Owned the Fujifilm 56mm f/1.2 too, love the rendering and sharp wide open at f/1.2, autofocus is a bit slow, especially when dealing with subject tracking. Compare the two, sigma definitely has a way more attractive price tag. If I have to pick one between the two now, I would go Sigma. But rumours has it, Fujifilm is going to have a 56mm mk2.
@@lukmie2769 I don’t think it will, since they definitely have to price it lower than their 50mm f/1. Plus based on the 23mm f/1.4 LM, it is pretty much the same price.
Thanks for watching. Super impressive to see what Sigma is doing. I personally prefer the Fujifilm but it's looking like Fujifilm users now have another great option for their bodies.
Look at the rendition of the black of the dress at e.g. 5:18. The Fujinon lets you feel the texture and shine of the cloth, whereas the Sigma is just a flat black. If I had the money, the Fujinon would be my choice w/o a doubt.
@@koju911 I wonder if that has something to do with exposure. It is true that the Sigma is a bit more contrasty, however it seems like the photo you are referring to is a 1/3 stop underexposed compared to the Fujinon. Dunno.
Is it just me, or did the sigma capture a slightly tighter frame than the Fuji? Also, I agree with some of the other commenters about the colors. The Sigma leaned a little warmer and more magenta while the Fuji had a touch more green. We’re the settings the same on both? It seemed like the Sigma exposed a bit darker on a few shots.
I had the settings the same on both cameras for the most part. As far as the color tones and everything that was all the same. I was shooting the Fujifilm at f1.2 so that made a difference and my settings for each photo were a little different. So I basically tried my best to match them in camera. Also, when I took the shots I stayed where I was and it seemed like the Sigma was a little tighter. But it's hard to say.
Properly excellent comparison out in the real world. I don’t have a dog in the hunt as I already have the Viltrox 56 f1.4 which works well, but I think I prefer the Sigma images. Either way, it’s great that Fuji shooters are finally getting great third party lenses to choose from.
I use Fuji cameras myself and I love them, but anyhow although both terrific lenses I found the Sigma slightly better. The Sigma was kind of brighter, natural and somehow effortless in greatness and that appealed to me.
AF is pretty comparable. However, during this video the Sigma didn't have it's final firmware so it's basically pre production. Which is why I didn't talk about the auto focus too much. But for what it was, it was pretty good.
Your lens comparisons are always what i need to see. to be able to make the kind of informed decision I need to make. I've been sooo patiently waiting for these Sigma primes to come to the X mount. We're eating good now, mon ami! Thanks for the video.
Maybe you mentioned this on the video and I didn't catch it, but is there any way we could download the JPEGs? I'd like to compare sharpness without factoring youtube compression into the mix
such a great video! if you are on a budget, do you think is still worth buying the old version of the 56 1.2 (used at half the price) or buying the Sigma is a better choise?
The optical performance is, for most intents and purposes, indistinguishable at equal apertures. The issue hinges on whether you want the Fuji badge, build and additional one third of a stop for twice the price.
Thanks for doing this great video. I couldn’t notice any differences to be honest, the IQ looked the same, maybe the Fuji had a very slight softer Bokeh but its an advantage definitely not something a customer will pickup. I would have loved to see a Continuous AF walking test or similar as for me this is an area the fuji 56 struggles. Did you find the Sigma performed any better with AF?
I'm very impressed with this sigma, I have to say that I prefer sigma colours, skin tones and sharpness, I appreciate that sigma have warm tones like Fujifilm. Maybe for price range I would see a comparative between sigma and Viltrox/tokina but I know they give a more cold tones that I don't like very much.
good side by side comparison. interesting they are far more similar than different. is the sigma slightly warmer look ? or was camera WB 100K different ?
I watched the entire video and not any final thoughts on what you thought of each of the lenses or the comparison. We've been nice to hear a recap of what you thought of the sigma
Honestly, for the price difference..Sigma all the way. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay the extra money for the Fuji when the results are this close..unless you want to stay firm with the brand loyalty. I might have missed It, but did you do any shots with both at 1.4? That would be a better comparison I think.
I have both at the moment and I must say, both feel very different. Even though the differences are minor, I prefer the Fuji for Portraits and the Sigma for everyday/travel lens more. The Fuji has a slightly different color rendition, die Bokeh looks a little bit more "classic", but also the whole lens feels way bigger and heavier. The Sigma has the typical Sigma look. Quite digital, less soul than the Fuji, consistently sharp, also the edges, way more neutral Bokeh balls than Fuji. And most importantly, it feels way lighter and it is significantly smaller. I prefer it for travel when space and weight is limited. And the Sigma has a more premium feel, maybe because it is not only metal and many chinese companies copy the all metal bodies of Fuji. It is made from high quality plastic that actually feels like metal and has high quality rubber on the focus ring. Especially in colder environment it feels nicer on the skin.
This was super helpful for my decision. Already sold the Fuji and picked up the mkII (not considered here) but was not for my everyday/travel - AF, handling, ease of use. Always preferred the 90 f2 look and rendering for portraits, so the Sigma looks a solid option for everyday short Tele... even if I'll miss the aperture ring.
Thanks for this. I'm looking at both right now. Adorama has the Fuji for just 499.99 NEW. The Sigma the same. They show to be almost identical yet the Sigma renders a slightly darker image. Is that what you saw? I think I'll go with the Sigma for the smaller form factor..
Loved the Video man I Recently Brought Fujifilm XT4 a month ago after watching your wedding shoot with XT3 and now will be opting 56mm sigma f1.4 its an impressive lens and affordable one!
Nice. I prefer the Sigma. Seems to be warmer with slightly more contrast. I liked it better than the Fuji lens in every shot. I already own the Sigma 30 1.4, looking to get this as well.
It is very close but in this video I noticed a couple things; Both are tradeoffs in center sharpness but I noticed the background out of focus is more creamy with the Fuji where the Sigma in comparison is slightly harder. The contrast is more noticeable on the sigma which doesn't surprise me being that sigma is not known for inner contrast qualities which I think is why the Fuji images Pop just a good bit more. Those things might be the difference in price and look. I'll stick with my XF56mm.
Def noticed the reds in her skin Coming out more My preference depended on the picture for me It would be nice to see a sharpness comparison with some zoom and get Johns feed back with the actual use. Talking about focusing and general performance.
I don't know if it is just my perception but I believe the images from the sigma are a bit flat so my personal preference would be the Fuji. I suppose that one of the main reasons I chose Fuji was that the lenses had an aperture ring so that would be a deal breaker for me. You are also very right about the fall off which is what sold me on the 56 1.2 in the first place. Most excellent job on the comparison!
Fuji showed more contrast and I could see a bit more micro contrast in the leaves in the latter shots. But it is more $ and more weight. But it has an aperture ring. As a side note - I've seen Fuji JPG be slightly different from one shot to another. A better test would be to shoot raw and apply the same consistent post processing.
Couple quick questions. Where are you shooting wide-open on every shot in the video or did you stop down to 1/3 or 2/3. I take it you’re using the most current firmware on both lenses? Is the Sigma lens front war upgradable life the future lenses? What is the auto focus speed about the same when using face detection? Did one lens hunt more than the other? Were you using servo or single?
I shot every picture in this photo wide open. No stopping down at all. Also, the Sigma was on pre-production firmware. Due to this I didn't talk too much about the autofocus but from what I saw it was pretty good. However, I always shoot in single point auto focus. So no continuous or eye auto focus. I'm not sure how well the Sigma performs in that as I didn't test it at all.
Hi John! Thank you so much for your vids. They are always informative and fun learning. Will you be able to do a video on x-s10 for portraits or a wedding soon? Thank you. Cheers.
I had this lens on my Lumix GX 8 and missed it so much...Now I am since half a year on Fuji XT-4 and saw that this lens also is for Fuji now. By your comparison definitely want to own this lens. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and images(nice sophisticated model btw), greets from the Netherlands, Guus
On this day it was SUPER overcast and cloudy. So what started happening is my auto white balance was showing things a little TOO blue for my liking. And since I was shooting in JPG I have to get everything correct in camera. So changing to Shade brought back the warmth to my images. Basically once skin tone starts looking off in camera is when I start shooting in Kelvin.
Finally a real comparison with real examples side by side. Great video. Where I live, Sigma is twice as cheap, so I have nothing to think about. Team Sigma and channel subscription.
Hey John, excellent video. Your video helped me decide to save the extra money and just buy the Sigma 56mm for my Fuji. I have a problem that I was hoping you might be able to offer some insight on. When I use Auto ISO WITH Shutter Speed dial set to "A", the camera defaults to a minimum S.S of around 1/300 or so. Which of course drives the ISO up unnecessarily. Have you experienced this or can you verify this behavior? Thanks for all your content, and double thanks if you're able to check into that!
I believe when you actually take the foto that the shutter speed or ISO changes from what you see as you're framing. Easy to do a test of that. See what u get when looking thru viewfinder and compare to metadata.
Both lenses produce really nice images, but, how did (you) like their performance? Which one is better for AF when it comes down to speed/snappiness/accuracy? I don't know if I should just buy a Fuji now or wait for the new Sigma to come out soon what is your opinion? Speed and accuracy is more important to me. Thank you will really appreciate your input on this.
It's really hard to say. The Sigma was doing great, however it also wasn't running it's final firmware. So I can't totally say how well the AF was doing. When I used it however it did feel good so that says a lot. I still prefer the Fuji lens but the Sigma is a great cheaper alternative.
@@jbivphotography Thanks for replying. What do you mean by "it's really hard to say"? You were using both lenses. Did you feel the Sigma had the same speed and accuracy as the Fuji? Did the Sigma ever hunted or couldn't lock on focus in any situation? One of the reasons why I ask is because I recently purchased the Viltrox 56mm with the latest firmware and people rave about that lens calling it "fast" compared to the Fuji 56 1.2, but the Viltrox isn't that fast and it misses focus on still objects in plain daylight. If totally fine if Sigma updates the firmware later on, but how did your copy perform? The tittle of your video is Which Lens Is Better? :-) If you say "is really hard to say" then would you say the Sigma performs the same as the Fuji since you didn't notice any difference? Thanks.
Great photoshoot. Love your amazing style of portraiture. I own the Fuji 56mm and am frustrated that I can’t get close enough for head & shoulder pics. I was hoping you would show Sigma’s close-focus advantage which should blow Fuji out of the water and create great background separation. Any chance you can do a short video showing close ficus comparison for portrait close-ups?
The min focusing distance on both lenses is exactly the same according to the specs sheets, 1.6'/50cm. There should be no significant close focus advantage to either one.
@@evankolpack I’ve got the older (non WR) version of the 56mm lens. Close focus is about 72cm. Can’t do portraits easily. Very annoying. I might get the newer Fuji 56mm. Or save money and buy the Sigma😀. Do you have any of these? Happy with results?
@@barrymayes6712 I don't have either, I was going off spec sheets. But after watching some videos comparing the old non-WR version and the new WR version, I'm sold on the latter, even at significantly higher $$$. Unless these comparisons are fudging things, the new lens is considerably sharper and there is WAY less glare/haziness from bright lights. It's very noticeable from standard pics viewed on a standard 1080 screen, no pixel peeping involved. The original 56 has a lovely look, a bit more oldschool and soft, while the sun glare/haze can give a cool nostalgic effect. But I'll be using this lens mostly for product photography, so clarity is super important.
Got the fuji 56 but the AF frustrates me. Just bought the new fuji 33mm and absolutely love it. Will be saving up for the fuji 56mm 1.2 mk2 and skipping viltrox & Sigma
I think this might be my biased opinion but Im more of a product shooter that would opt for the Sigma due to its macro/like ability to shoot really close compared to Fuji. if you do it as a main job (portrait shooter the Fuji) might be better for someone like me who shoots product shots Im more inclined towards the sigma
Sigma just recently starting making lenses that will fit on the Fujifilm cameras. I still prefer the native Fujifilm lenses but it's something you should totally check out.
You have to change the aperture using the settings on your camera. If you have an X-T series you can do that with the dials on the front and back of the camera.
Thanks a lot for this great video! I will go for Sigma 56 1.4 for sure. but if Sigma have aperture ring like Fuji it would be great. It will made me very easy and comfortable to use.
Hi, thanks for your job, really interesting. For me the Fuji looks more “film” and the bokeh is more pleasant so it is more than better for portrait. The Sigma is maybe better on sport or fast kids portraits I imagine but, the Fuji will come in a new version soon I suppose, like 18-23-33 did. Cheers
What a great comparison! Excellent video, thanks for this. I think this makes the Sigma a no brainer as a budget option for being this close to the Fuji IQ wise.
Thank you for doing this video. I found the Fuji lens in "like new condition" for 25 dollars more than the Sigma brand new. I was wondering if I should cancel and get the Sigma just because it's brand new and it being lighter. After watching your video, I found myself liking the results from Fuji more often. Maybe I am seeing things but the model's face looked a little larger in the results than Fuji? Or maybe it was the skin tone result. Very little difference overall though. I'll keep my Fuji order. Appreciate you.
Thanks for the nicely setup comparison. Since I already own a Fuji 56/1.2, I will stick with it. It will be interesting to see if Fujifilm does release a significantly higher resolution sensor next year as rumored and how these Fuji and Sigma lenses stack up then --- however, the Sigma is so much cheaper I can see buying it now and have more money left over for buying a newer lens later if necesary.
Would like to see a lowlight comparison. At some fotos the fuji looks brighter but anyway, the sigma is so close… and the money you save… was there at least a big difference in the af?
So at 6:04, the Fuji missed focus and for some reason is front-focused on your model's shoulder (and I don't doubt you had the box over her eye, FWIW). That's the main thing that drives me insane about the Fuji, i.e. the sporadic AF. I often like the slightly soft glow of the F1.2 wide open (though not in every case, admittedly), but the thing is I can always add a little softening in post to taste. What I **can't** do is go back in time and make the lens nail focus like it should have in the first place, and there's a lot of times I'd like to with my Fuji 56mm. Having shot the Sigma on Sony and MFT, I already know it's a bit sharper, CA control is better (3:19), and the slightly narrower depth of field I can certainly live with, but the biggest draw for me is the AF. I'll miss the aperture ring for sure, but still, preordered the Sigma.
They are so close, even in side by side its hard to differentiate. Bokeh looks similar (despite the fact Sigma is 1.4), Sigma looks tad darker and more contrasty IMHO. Are there any difference in AF performance?
Based solely on your Jpeg images and being on a budget I would get the Sigma lens because new vs. new it's 1/3 the price of Fuji's 56mm, but if I wasn't on a budget, I'd still purchase the Sigma because I preferred its Jpeg's over the Fuji lens.
Great job! I read distortion is noticeable on the Sigma e-mount. As your shots containing architectural elements look pretty clean (to me at least), can we conclude that in-camera correction does a fine job and distortion won't be an issue for jpegs shooters?
I don't know if this sounds weird , but the looks of these 2 lens is kinda different in my eyes , it's not technical ... but the Fuji 56mm 1.2 looks like a fuji photo , while the sigma one renders something a sony camera will produce. both looks great , but still different looks. thanks for the hardwork , your videos make me wanna become a wedding photographer lol cheers.
It's fairly close IMHO but I thought the Fuji image was better vis a vis micro contrast which gives it a better look for me. Check out the pendant in the various shots - it just sparkles more with the Fuji. Good comparison video. Would love to see a studio/strobe version.
Pretty decent. It's running on pre-production firmware so I didn't do too many video tests but nothing really caught my attention with the autofocus. Which is a good thing.
May have missed it but i think you were shooting at 1.2 on the Fuji lens. i believe if you keep the 2 lens at 1.4, the Fuji would have been the clear winner. Anycase thanks a lot John for the great video
As most of the people here I like sigma, but the real question is: how does af performs? I’ve switch from fuji to viltrox 56mm because of the fastest af and less focus hunting, if the sigma will be at least as fast as the viltrox will be a no brainer choice!
AF was actually not too bad. Pretty smooth from what I saw. But I was also on pre-production firmware so I don't really know what the final release is going to function like.
Hello John, Thank you very much for the fantastic work, i made my decision by your rewiew... It would be great to make a rewiew between the new 56 1.2 WR and the Sigma 56 on XT-5 Bodies. Thanks a lot 🍀🙏🍀 Christoph
Thanks for this comparison video, John! I found Tony's comparison a bit clinical - yours is a great real world example in what I would consider ideal light. If it weren't for the smidgen of extra background separation on the Fuji, I would consider these images indistinguishable when viewed on RUclips or Insta. The 56mm f/1.2 is my most used lens, but I'm happy to see the enthusiasm around, and quality of, the Sigma trio.
The Fujinon is a superb portrait lens. The Fujinon lens has a bit more character (eg softer bokeh), the Sigma wants to be sharp (what the ideal was a decade ago).
So who's your vote going with? Team Fuji or Team Sigma?
I think I prefer the Sigma, great video as always John 👍🏽
I like Fuji.. But I must say sigma, wins this round….!!! 👍👍 😅
@@daniellesiobhan5558 Thanks for watching!
@@robertbland5131 I'm still over here claiming team Fuji!
Team Fuji!!
I prefer the Fuji, the way they their bokeh gives it character
Microcontrast is unbelieavalbe on the 56 Fuji - 10% above Sigma. Clean and clear like fresh water - smooth at the same time. Look at the richness of skin tones. The Sigma as any Sigma I own with a fantastic result, but the topping on the Fuji reminds me my GF Lenses. Absolut fantastic.
you did a phenomenal job recreating the same composition with both lenses. Most comparisons just have similar shots while you had pretty much the exact same in all of them except the walking one! this is great, please do more.
i actually had the sigma when i shot Sony, but made the switch to Fuji in part because of the f1.2. even though the depth of field is only marginally shallower, it really shines in some photos (like at 1:34)
Thank you so much. I tried my best to match each image in camera as closley as possible. I'm glad it's noticeable. Yeah I really REALLY love the Fujifilm 56. Overall it seemed sharper and the Dof is really nice. Also the fall off is to die for. Thanks for watching and I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I think I like the colors and contrast of the Sigma. I would like to see how the Sigma 18-50 2.8 will perform when it's out.
when the sigma 18-50 mm f2.8 for fuji out ?
With such a wide f1.2 aperture, highlights are brighter whereas the f1.4 was subtly less bright. Amazing both lenses performed about the same from my viewpoint. Thx!!
You and the model both did an astonishing job recreating the same image with each lens! Really great comparison. Based on these shots, I think I'll save myself $520 and get the Sigma. To my eyes the differences weren't consistent enough to pick a clear favorite, so I'm happy to take the affordable option. I'd like to have an aperture ring, but if I'm honest with myself I'm gonna lock the aperture at 1.4 most of the time. Edit: Maybe one consistent exception in the skin tone where the Fuji has a slight edge for me: I think skin tones (oranges, I guess) are rendered slightly lighter, making the skin look smoother overall. Normally I'd create that effect with the HSL panel in Lightroom. Definitely not a big enough difference to make me spend the extra money.
Such great shots and the best comparison video I have ever seen with the shots being identical, side by side, entartaining, and no dumb pixel peeping. Keep them coming.
Used to have the sigma 56mm e mount when I had my Sony A6500, fantastic lens with great af and image quality. Owned the Fujifilm 56mm f/1.2 too, love the rendering and sharp wide open at f/1.2, autofocus is a bit slow, especially when dealing with subject tracking. Compare the two, sigma definitely has a way more attractive price tag. If I have to pick one between the two now, I would go Sigma. But rumours has it, Fujifilm is going to have a 56mm mk2.
Mk2 at twice the price probably.
@@lukmie2769 I don’t think it will, since they definitely have to price it lower than their 50mm f/1. Plus based on the 23mm f/1.4 LM, it is pretty much the same price.
Prefer the sigma. Seems to have more vibrance, contrast and warmer tones. More of these videos please! When are these lenses out? Can’t wait!
I think the Sigma lenses are shipping in April sometime.
@@jbivphotography awesome! Just jumped on to Fuji this week. Still trying to decided whether to get the 35 f2 or just wait for the sigma 30 1.4.
They are both great but I agree the sigma is slightly more pleasing
Thanks for watching. Super impressive to see what Sigma is doing. I personally prefer the Fujifilm but it's looking like Fujifilm users now have another great option for their bodies.
How does the sigma compare to the 50 f2?
The differences are so slight they're basically negligible. Great comparison!
Look at the rendition of the black of the dress at e.g. 5:18. The Fujinon lets you feel the texture and shine of the cloth, whereas the Sigma is just a flat black. If I had the money, the Fujinon would be my choice w/o a doubt.
@@koju911 I wonder if that has something to do with exposure. It is true that the Sigma is a bit more contrasty, however it seems like the photo you are referring to is a 1/3 stop underexposed compared to the Fujinon. Dunno.
@@koju911dude you’re saying this as it’s a massive difference. “The texture of the dress???” 😂
Is it just me, or did the sigma capture a slightly tighter frame than the Fuji? Also, I agree with some of the other commenters about the colors. The Sigma leaned a little warmer and more magenta while the Fuji had a touch more green. We’re the settings the same on both? It seemed like the Sigma exposed a bit darker on a few shots.
I had the settings the same on both cameras for the most part. As far as the color tones and everything that was all the same. I was shooting the Fujifilm at f1.2 so that made a difference and my settings for each photo were a little different. So I basically tried my best to match them in camera. Also, when I took the shots I stayed where I was and it seemed like the Sigma was a little tighter. But it's hard to say.
Properly excellent comparison out in the real world. I don’t have a dog in the hunt as I already have the Viltrox 56 f1.4 which works well, but I think I prefer the Sigma images. Either way, it’s great that Fuji shooters are finally getting great third party lenses to choose from.
Is your viltrox as good as these?
u go for sigma beacuse sigma have good optical quality
Great video! Informative, creative, and to the point. Not to mention, your images are fantastic! Best RUclips video I've watched today. Well done.
Thanks so much! I’m glad you enjoyed the video! Hopefully much more of this to come in the future.
I use Fuji cameras myself and I love them, but anyhow although both terrific lenses I found the Sigma slightly better. The Sigma was kind of brighter, natural and somehow effortless in greatness and that appealed to me.
Sigma is a bit warmer. The Fuji has a bit more 3D pop and character, from what I can see on my phone screen. How does the AF compare?
AF is pretty comparable. However, during this video the Sigma didn't have it's final firmware so it's basically pre production. Which is why I didn't talk about the auto focus too much. But for what it was, it was pretty good.
Your lens comparisons are always what i need to see. to be able to make the kind of informed decision I need to make. I've been sooo patiently waiting for these Sigma primes to come to the X mount. We're eating good now, mon ami! Thanks for the video.
Maybe you mentioned this on the video and I didn't catch it, but is there any way we could download the JPEGs? I'd like to compare sharpness without factoring youtube compression into the mix
such a great video! if you are on a budget, do you think is still worth buying the old version of the 56 1.2 (used at half the price) or buying the Sigma is a better choise?
The optical performance is, for most intents and purposes, indistinguishable at equal apertures. The issue hinges on whether you want the Fuji badge, build and additional one third of a stop for twice the price.
Thanks for doing this great video. I couldn’t notice any differences to be honest, the IQ looked the same, maybe the Fuji had a very slight softer Bokeh but its an advantage definitely not something a customer will pickup. I would have loved to see a Continuous AF walking test or similar as for me this is an area the fuji 56 struggles. Did you find the Sigma performed any better with AF?
sigma is more contrasty
I'm very impressed with this sigma, I have to say that I prefer sigma colours, skin tones and sharpness, I appreciate that sigma have warm tones like Fujifilm. Maybe for price range I would see a comparative between sigma and Viltrox/tokina but I know they give a more cold tones that I don't like very much.
good side by side comparison. interesting they are far more similar than different. is the sigma slightly warmer look ? or was camera WB 100K different ?
How's the autofocus speed? I've read the Fuji is slower. Also, is it me or the Sigma images look sharper?
I watched the entire video and not any final thoughts on what you thought of each of the lenses or the comparison. We've been nice to hear a recap of what you thought of the sigma
My question is which one has the best AF performance?
Honestly, for the price difference..Sigma all the way. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay the extra money for the Fuji when the results are this close..unless you want to stay firm with the brand loyalty. I might have missed It, but did you do any shots with both at 1.4? That would be a better comparison I think.
what straps are you using to keep cameras on you?
I have both at the moment and I must say, both feel very different.
Even though the differences are minor, I prefer the Fuji for Portraits and the Sigma for everyday/travel lens more.
The Fuji has a slightly different color rendition, die Bokeh looks a little bit more "classic", but also the whole lens feels way bigger and heavier.
The Sigma has the typical Sigma look. Quite digital, less soul than the Fuji, consistently sharp, also the edges, way more neutral Bokeh balls than Fuji. And most importantly, it feels way lighter and it is significantly smaller. I prefer it for travel when space and weight is limited. And the Sigma has a more premium feel, maybe because it is not only metal and many chinese companies copy the all metal bodies of Fuji. It is made from high quality plastic that actually feels like metal and has high quality rubber on the focus ring. Especially in colder environment it feels nicer on the skin.
Great summary, thank you.
This was super helpful for my decision. Already sold the Fuji and picked up the mkII (not considered here) but was not for my everyday/travel - AF, handling, ease of use. Always preferred the 90 f2 look and rendering for portraits, so the Sigma looks a solid option for everyday short Tele... even if I'll miss the aperture ring.
Thanks for this. I'm looking at both right now. Adorama has the Fuji for just 499.99 NEW. The Sigma the same. They show to be almost identical yet the Sigma renders a slightly darker image. Is that what you saw? I think I'll go with the Sigma for the smaller form factor..
Loved the Video man I Recently Brought Fujifilm XT4 a month ago after watching your wedding shoot with XT3 and now will be opting 56mm sigma f1.4 its an impressive lens and affordable one!
Nice. I prefer the Sigma. Seems to be warmer with slightly more contrast. I liked it better than the Fuji lens in every shot. I already own the Sigma 30 1.4, looking to get this as well.
Same
Same here! Honestly only contemplating on wheter I should get this lens or wait for the viltrox 75mm to be available
Which squarespace template your friend used for his site??
It is very close but in this video I noticed a couple things; Both are tradeoffs in center sharpness but I noticed the background out of focus is more creamy with the Fuji where the Sigma in comparison is slightly harder. The contrast is more noticeable on the sigma which doesn't surprise me being that sigma is not known for inner contrast qualities which I think is why the Fuji images Pop just a good bit more.
Those things might be the difference in price and look. I'll stick with my XF56mm.
What focus mode are you using? I'm struggling to get the face in focus using both af-s and eye/face detection on and off
How is the AF on Sigma lens?
There is now the question if I should add the Sigma to my kit as a lightweight option as an addition to my 50/1.0?
Def noticed the reds in her skin Coming out more
My preference depended on the picture for me
It would be nice to see a sharpness comparison with some zoom and get Johns feed back with the actual use. Talking about focusing and general performance.
Yeah I've been doing a bit of testing with both lenses. Deff going to make a "my thoughts" video at some point.
@@jbivphotography Get on with it lol
I don't know if it is just my perception but I believe the images from the sigma are a bit flat so my personal preference would be the Fuji. I suppose that one of the main reasons I chose Fuji was that the lenses had an aperture ring so that would be a deal breaker for me. You are also very right about the fall off which is what sold me on the 56 1.2 in the first place. Most excellent job on the comparison!
Fuji showed more contrast and I could see a bit more micro contrast in the leaves in the latter shots. But it is more $ and more weight. But it has an aperture ring. As a side note - I've seen Fuji JPG be slightly different from one shot to another. A better test would be to shoot raw and apply the same consistent post processing.
Couple quick questions. Where are you shooting wide-open on every shot in the video or did you stop down to 1/3 or 2/3. I take it you’re using the most current firmware on both lenses? Is the Sigma lens front war upgradable life the future lenses? What is the auto focus speed about the same when using face detection? Did one lens hunt more than the other? Were you using servo or single?
I shot every picture in this photo wide open. No stopping down at all. Also, the Sigma was on pre-production firmware. Due to this I didn't talk too much about the autofocus but from what I saw it was pretty good. However, I always shoot in single point auto focus. So no continuous or eye auto focus. I'm not sure how well the Sigma performs in that as I didn't test it at all.
@@jbivphotography ok
Great video. To be honest, I can't find any major difference between the two. Seems the sigma is a huge bargain.
I am newbie in mirrorless, so I have to ask : Is there any reason why to not use electronic shutter during outdoor shooting?
Hi John! Thank you so much for your vids. They are always informative and fun learning.
Will you be able to do a video on x-s10 for portraits or a wedding soon?
Thank you. Cheers.
Did I miss your thoughts on focus speed, accuracy and the images appearing on your computer screen (and not my iPhone😊
I had this lens on my Lumix GX 8 and missed it so much...Now I am since half a year on Fuji XT-4 and saw that this lens also is for Fuji now. By your comparison definitely want to own this lens. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and images(nice sophisticated model btw), greets from the Netherlands, Guus
Hey John! Just out of curiosity, why did you change your WB to shade? What was the benefit of using that WB mode?
On this day it was SUPER overcast and cloudy. So what started happening is my auto white balance was showing things a little TOO blue for my liking. And since I was shooting in JPG I have to get everything correct in camera. So changing to Shade brought back the warmth to my images. Basically once skin tone starts looking off in camera is when I start shooting in Kelvin.
Thanks for the comparison. The fuji seems to have more contrast and pop while the sigma's bokeh quality is smoother and less distracting.
Finally a real comparison with real examples side by side. Great video. Where I live, Sigma is twice as cheap, so I have nothing to think about. Team Sigma and channel subscription.
Are you gonna make Capture One Styles for your presets?
I tried to and I don't think they did very well so I had to pull them from my shop. Still looking into it however.
do you use squarespace as your website setup ?
I do. I’ve been using SQUARESPACE for close to 8 years now. I do need to update my website however.
May i ask - is the Fuji a bit more cooler toned?
It does seem like it. I was noticing it when I was taking photos.
On the fence between Fuji xt5 and Sony a7iv for portrait photography
Hey John, excellent video. Your video helped me decide to save the extra money and just buy the Sigma 56mm for my Fuji. I have a problem that I was hoping you might be able to offer some insight on. When I use Auto ISO WITH Shutter Speed dial set to "A", the camera defaults to a minimum S.S of around 1/300 or so. Which of course drives the ISO up unnecessarily. Have you experienced this or can you verify this behavior? Thanks for all your content, and double thanks if you're able to check into that!
I believe when you actually take the foto that the shutter speed or ISO changes from what you see as you're framing. Easy to do a test of that. See what u get when looking thru viewfinder and compare to metadata.
Both lenses produce really nice images, but, how did (you) like their performance? Which one is better for AF when it comes down to speed/snappiness/accuracy? I don't know if I should just buy a Fuji now or wait for the new Sigma to come out soon what is your opinion? Speed and accuracy is more important to me. Thank you will really appreciate your input on this.
It's really hard to say. The Sigma was doing great, however it also wasn't running it's final firmware. So I can't totally say how well the AF was doing. When I used it however it did feel good so that says a lot. I still prefer the Fuji lens but the Sigma is a great cheaper alternative.
@@jbivphotography Thanks for replying. What do you mean by "it's really hard to say"? You were using both lenses. Did you feel the Sigma had the same speed and accuracy as the Fuji? Did the Sigma ever hunted or couldn't lock on focus in any situation? One of the reasons why I ask is because I recently purchased the Viltrox 56mm with the latest firmware and people rave about that lens calling it "fast" compared to the Fuji 56 1.2, but the Viltrox isn't that fast and it misses focus on still objects in plain daylight.
If totally fine if Sigma updates the firmware later on, but how did your copy perform? The tittle of your video is Which Lens Is Better? :-)
If you say "is really hard to say" then would you say the Sigma performs the same as the Fuji since you didn't notice any difference? Thanks.
Did you do a Voltron’s 75mm 1.2?
I actually haven’t used any Viltrox lenses before.
@@jbivphotography just got my XT5 look forward to more of your videos on Fuji and maybe the viltrox 75 1.2 May pop up for you. Haha have a good one!
When you shoot the walking photos, did you use continuous mode or single and how many on either lens stayed in focus?
I was in continous af using zone autofocus.
But is the Fuji 56 the lasteast version the WR ?…
It's hard to find a real problem with the Sigma optically. It also appeared to hit focus more accurately than the Fuji lens in a few of these shots.
Yeah. I think that was either me missing focus or the fact that the Fuji is at 1.2 vs the 1.4 of the Sigma.
Great photoshoot. Love your amazing style of portraiture. I own the Fuji 56mm and am frustrated that I can’t get close enough for head & shoulder pics. I was hoping you would show Sigma’s close-focus advantage which should blow Fuji out of the water and create great background separation. Any chance you can do a short video showing close ficus comparison for portrait close-ups?
The min focusing distance on both lenses is exactly the same according to the specs sheets, 1.6'/50cm. There should be no significant close focus advantage to either one.
@@evankolpack I’ve got the older (non WR) version of the 56mm lens. Close focus is about 72cm. Can’t do portraits easily. Very annoying. I might get the newer Fuji 56mm. Or save money and buy the Sigma😀. Do you have any of these? Happy with results?
@@barrymayes6712 I don't have either, I was going off spec sheets. But after watching some videos comparing the old non-WR version and the new WR version, I'm sold on the latter, even at significantly higher $$$. Unless these comparisons are fudging things, the new lens is considerably sharper and there is WAY less glare/haziness from bright lights. It's very noticeable from standard pics viewed on a standard 1080 screen, no pixel peeping involved. The original 56 has a lovely look, a bit more oldschool and soft, while the sun glare/haze can give a cool nostalgic effect. But I'll be using this lens mostly for product photography, so clarity is super important.
Got the fuji 56 but the AF frustrates me. Just bought the new fuji 33mm and absolutely love it. Will be saving up for the fuji 56mm 1.2 mk2 and skipping viltrox & Sigma
The 33mm 1,4 is a great lens, right? Rented it for a wedding and was very pleased with the quality. Also, lots of bokeh coming from a 35mm f2.
I think this might be my biased opinion but Im more of a product shooter that would opt for the Sigma due to its macro/like ability to shoot really close compared to Fuji. if you do it as a main job (portrait shooter the Fuji) might be better for someone like me who shoots product shots Im more inclined towards the sigma
Looking at getting a fujifilm xt4. But I don't know what lens fit it. Example sigma? What am I looking at
Sigma just recently starting making lenses that will fit on the Fujifilm cameras. I still prefer the native Fujifilm lenses but it's something you should totally check out.
Hi! I see your video and i buy it. Sigma 56 f1.4 and i whrilly don't know how to change the apperture. Sorry for my english .
You have to change the aperture using the settings on your camera. If you have an X-T series you can do that with the dials on the front and back of the camera.
Kinda with you would e tossed the viltrox one too. When you do the 30mm can you have the viltrox in it too?
Ooo. Having a Viltrox in this too would have been cool. I've actually NEVER used any Viltrox lenses at all so I'm not very familiar with them.
Thanks a lot for this great video!
I will go for Sigma 56 1.4 for sure.
but if Sigma have aperture ring like Fuji it would be great.
It will made me very easy and comfortable to use.
Hi, thanks for your job, really interesting.
For me the Fuji looks more “film” and the bokeh is more pleasant so it is more than better for portrait.
The Sigma is maybe better on sport or fast kids portraits I imagine but, the Fuji will come in a new version soon I suppose, like 18-23-33 did.
Cheers
Thanks for sharing! I also prefer the Fuji look.
What a great comparison! Excellent video, thanks for this. I think this makes the Sigma a no brainer as a budget option for being this close to the Fuji IQ wise.
Thanks for watching!
Why does the face looks brighter on the fuji lens?
Thank you for doing this video. I found the Fuji lens in "like new condition" for 25 dollars more than the Sigma brand new. I was wondering if I should cancel and get the Sigma just because it's brand new and it being lighter. After watching your video, I found myself liking the results from Fuji more often. Maybe I am seeing things but the model's face looked a little larger in the results than Fuji? Or maybe it was the skin tone result. Very little difference overall though. I'll keep my Fuji order. Appreciate you.
Thanks for the nicely setup comparison. Since I already own a Fuji 56/1.2, I will stick with it. It will be interesting to see if Fujifilm does release a significantly higher resolution sensor next year as rumored and how these Fuji and Sigma lenses stack up then --- however, the Sigma is so much cheaper I can see buying it now and have more money left over for buying a newer lens later if necesary.
Would like to see a lowlight comparison. At some fotos the fuji looks brighter but anyway, the sigma is so close… and the money you save… was there at least a big difference in the af?
So at 6:04, the Fuji missed focus and for some reason is front-focused on your model's shoulder (and I don't doubt you had the box over her eye, FWIW). That's the main thing that drives me insane about the Fuji, i.e. the sporadic AF. I often like the slightly soft glow of the F1.2 wide open (though not in every case, admittedly), but the thing is I can always add a little softening in post to taste. What I **can't** do is go back in time and make the lens nail focus like it should have in the first place, and there's a lot of times I'd like to with my Fuji 56mm. Having shot the Sigma on Sony and MFT, I already know it's a bit sharper, CA control is better (3:19), and the slightly narrower depth of field I can certainly live with, but the biggest draw for me is the AF. I'll miss the aperture ring for sure, but still, preordered the Sigma.
sigma is more saturated, more contrasty image. The fujifilm looks more natural and have a better micro contrast. Definitely prefer fujifilm.
Same. It's surprising how close they are but Fujifilm takes the win here.
Sigma is little warmer. Isn’t it? Compare to price point sigma did amazing work.
To each their own, I definitely prefer the sigma
Sigma looked a little sharper but please tell us what you thought about speed ,sharpness,color. Thank you
I'll be making a video on my thoughts of the lenses vs each other.
They are so close, even in side by side its hard to differentiate. Bokeh looks similar (despite the fact Sigma is 1.4), Sigma looks tad darker and more contrasty IMHO. Are there any difference in AF performance?
Based solely on your Jpeg images and being on a budget I would get the Sigma lens because new vs. new it's 1/3 the price of Fuji's 56mm, but if I wasn't on a budget, I'd still purchase the Sigma because I preferred its Jpeg's over the Fuji lens.
Great job! I read distortion is noticeable on the Sigma e-mount. As your shots containing architectural elements look pretty clean (to me at least), can we conclude that in-camera correction does a fine job and distortion won't be an issue for jpegs shooters?
Thank you for the post. In my opinion the Fuji is a bit softer
Thanks for watching!
I'm selling my T3 and getting the Sigma to go with my H2 for sure. Nice comparison.
I don't know if this sounds weird , but the looks of these 2 lens is kinda different in my eyes , it's not technical ... but the Fuji 56mm 1.2 looks like a fuji photo , while the sigma one renders something a sony camera will produce. both looks great , but still different looks.
thanks for the hardwork , your videos make me wanna become a wedding photographer lol
cheers.
It's fairly close IMHO but I thought the Fuji image was better vis a vis micro contrast which gives it a better look for me. Check out the pendant in the various shots - it just sparkles more with the Fuji. Good comparison video. Would love to see a studio/strobe version.
How was the af ?
Pretty decent. It's running on pre-production firmware so I didn't do too many video tests but nothing really caught my attention with the autofocus. Which is a good thing.
May have missed it but i think you were shooting at 1.2 on the Fuji lens. i believe if you keep the 2 lens at 1.4, the Fuji would have been the clear winner. Anycase thanks a lot John for the great video
Have you tryed de Tokina?
I have not. Actually using this Sigma was the first time I've ever used a 3rd party lens on my cameras.
Equal quality. Sigma lenses are a class act. Good job comparing.
just the video i was looking for. cant wait till the next one!
Awesome! Next one coming up soon just for you!
i am sticking with my fuji john. The Sigma to my eyes felt slightly warmer with contrast.
I'm still a fan of the Fuji as well.
Terrific job in matching shots.
Thank you so much. It’s really hard to do.
As most of the people here I like sigma, but the real question is: how does af performs?
I’ve switch from fuji to viltrox 56mm because of the fastest af and less focus hunting, if the sigma will be at least as fast as the viltrox will be a no brainer choice!
AF was actually not too bad. Pretty smooth from what I saw. But I was also on pre-production firmware so I don't really know what the final release is going to function like.
what about viltrox?
I've actually never shot with any viltrox lenses. I'm curious to see how they stack up.
@@jbivphotography hmmm thanks for the reply. thinking of buying a 56mm but stuck in thought between fuji, sigma and viltrox.
Would like to see the sigma vs the Fuji f2
Excellent work. They look pretty close to me. Great model and location.
Thank you very much! Glad you enjoyed it!
I just wanna know if fuji is going to say something about the rumored mark two of this lens
Hello John,
Thank you very much for the fantastic work, i made my decision by your rewiew... It would be great to make a rewiew between the new 56 1.2 WR and the Sigma 56 on XT-5 Bodies.
Thanks a lot 🍀🙏🍀 Christoph
Team Sigma, I find that it’s warmer, with deeper blacks, and it’s cheaper!,
I will be getting the Sigma
Thanks for this comparison video, John! I found Tony's comparison a bit clinical - yours is a great real world example in what I would consider ideal light. If it weren't for the smidgen of extra background separation on the Fuji, I would consider these images indistinguishable when viewed on RUclips or Insta. The 56mm f/1.2 is my most used lens, but I'm happy to see the enthusiasm around, and quality of, the Sigma trio.
The Fujinon is a superb portrait lens. The Fujinon lens has a bit more character (eg softer bokeh), the Sigma wants to be sharp (what the ideal was a decade ago).