Mary Queen of Scots Movie Clip - Throne of England (2018) | Movieclips Coming Soon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- Check out the new movie clip for Mary Queen of Scots starring Margot Robbie! Let us know what you think in the comments below.
► Buy Tickets to Mary Queen of Scots: www.fandango.c...
Want to be notified of all the latest clips and behind the scenes footage? Subscribe to the channel and click the bell icon to stay up to date.
US Release Date: December 7, 2018
Starring: Margot Robbie
Directed By: Josie Rourke
Synopsis: Mary Stuart's attempt to overthrow her cousin Elizabeth I, Queen of England, finds her condemned to years of imprisonment before facing execution.
Watch More:
► Coming Soon to Theaters: bit.ly/2mkFBqr
► Movie Clips: bit.ly/2FrP8VL
► Movie Trailers: bit.ly/2GlOAkM
Fuel Your Movie Obsession:
► Subscribe to COMING SOON: bit.ly/2CMX5D1
► Watch Movieclips ORIGINALS: bit.ly/2D3sipV
► Like us on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/2DikvkY
► Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/2mgkaHb
► Follow us on INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/2mg0VNU
The Fandango MOVIECLIPS COMING SOON channel is home to all the movie clips, trailers, behind the scenes videos, and more from the best upcoming movies. Subscribe to learn more about the movies you love!
The only good thing is that they made her skin hideous due to smallpox scars, something that a lot of films leave out.
Gaia Girl
She also used a face paint that was really damaging. The more she used it, the worse her skin would get and it became a vicious cycle.
In all fairness, they almost certainly still downplayed it quite a bit for the purpose of the film. It would have been interesting if they'd played it up a bit more for the film, especially since the film clearly takes Mary's side more than Elizabeth's. By the end of the film, Margot Robbie's Elizabeth has become rather brittle and hard in the way she behaves -- and there's something about her appearance which almost makes her appear inhuman. Saoirse Ronan's Mary, by contrast, remains luminous.
I always admire it when actresses are unafraid to look ugly, for the sake of realism. I love that Margot Robbie goes the extra mile for her roles, like in I, Tonya.
that's also why I love actresses like Bette Davis too cause they treat their acting seriously rather than trying to be a wannabe glamour star
Well, she's not ugly. She looks natural and organic, as opposed to glamorous and flawless.
I only knew Margot Robbie from her action movies. But I saw this role, and I just thought, Damn. This woman can act.
I think no one will ever be able to beat Cate Blanchett as Elizabeth!
Exactly. Cate Blanchett's performance of Queen Elizabeth I is still the greatest and most iconic of all time.
Agreed!!
Observe Lord Burghley. I am married -- to England.
Agree
@@EzekielPrellus That was a well directed and dramatic scene with Cate's emergence as the Virgin Queen.
Just finished watching the film. It could have been a great film if the producers/writers sticked with the book to which the film was adapted. They could've followed the historical timeline of both Mary and Elizabeth.
She is wonderful actress
She's alright. She's no Cate Blanchett.
I just watched it and she was very good. Wish she had more screen time.
Cate is the Best, but Margo is too great
They are both great. Why need to compare
disagree..not very good
I just got done reading about Margaret Tudor, mary’s grandmother. They both had the worst taste in men, what the hell was Their obsession with the Douglas clan? Archibald Douglas earl of Angus caused enough trouble, did Mary really think she was going to have better luck with his grandson the Earl of Darnley?
0:24 "ariana, what are you doing here?? 😂"
Great acting, great scene, great cast. Historical inaccuracies aside, the direction of this film was just isn't as impactful. I was hoping it to be close to Elizabeth (Cate B version).
It's always presented in films that Mary was a snake or on this case a wild unruly madam who got too big for her boots and Elizabeth, meanwhile was kind and sympathised with Mary but was surrounded by evil power hungry opportunistic ♂men who were whispering poison in her left right and central.
This is acting class
why is everyone focused on the black man? He has nothing to do with the plot of this movie
historical accuracy
racism.
@@lovepower4899 It's hardly racism. He doesn't belong there. There were NO black members of the English court, and no amount of blackwashing historical characters is going to change that.
@@MsAggie78 there were actually especially in Henry viii and Elizabeth’s courts and there were even some in Mary Stuart’s
@@thejuryspeaks In what positions? Certainly not as ambassadors!
And Black dudes during the elizabethan era ? WTF ??????
Maybe a Moor.
@@51Saffron he does not play a moor🙄
I haven't seen the movie yet but I think he plays the part of Thomas Randolph. Elizabeth's English ambassador to Scotland. He spent most of his time in Scotland.
There were black officials in her court but i doubt the person he was portraying is black, it doesn’t matter for the plot that this random character is black so just enjoy the movie. No one complayed when half of the hamilton cast wasn’t white because their skin colour didn’t affect the plot
This is getting ridiculous, as a colored person, this looks stupid. It's like putting white people in Japan 400 A.D.
This movie is already historically innacurate for the sake of forced diversity. A black man simply wouldn't have been in Elizabeth's council.
Except there were. Katherine of Aragon bought black "friends"
@@Tatopotatoo Servants and ladies-in-waiting. That doesn't mean one would have been given such a high position as advisor to a monarch.
@@zoegrant1929 not quite.
While rare, some African folks held considerably high posts from Henry VIII's time. Diego Elejalde was an African-Spanish diplomat and interpreter at her court.
She had several correspondences with the King of Algiers, King of Kongo and the Moroccan Sultante via diplomats.
John Blanke was famously given a salary for being a quality trumpeter since Henry's time. .
And then she welcomed several scholars and diplomats throughout her reign.
On balance, owned quite a few slaves.
I'm sorry, but all that I have seen from this film is just that it is super pro-Mary and paints Elizabeth as wanting Mary to succeed her and being overruled by men. The filmmakers should have been people who had no bias for either figure and painted a true & finer picture for the audience.
Do u not know the name of the movie?
movies are mostly super pro elizabeth. The winner writes history, didn't you know? Mary's own counselors hated her religion and forced her out of Scotland. She was incredibly unlucky vs Elizabeth where her counselors protected her protestant country--fiercly so. They both got opposite hands. I dont agree that lizzie should've killed a fellow monarch though, that was petty AF, even james tried to stop her and europe warned her.
Look at the forced representation and diversity in this scene! I don't expect historical accuracy from these things but I do expect a period drama to respect the period.
Hollywood is putting modern sensibilities above aesthetic cohesion and logical casting, what a shame.
Settle down. History tells us that many dysfunctional characters can fit ANY ethnicity and race. The actor is simply playing a character. Woe to you for being narrow-minded on the little things in life.
If this scene boggled your mind; then *spoiler alert* the movie has an Asian actress playing the role of a maiden.
SunshineSurfsup1 then I cannot wait until the new Martin Luther king biopic where he's played by an asian, after all; he's only playing a character.
@laura p You're right, there are times when it's inappropriate, for example it's considered inappropriate seemingly when a white actor or actress plays another ethnicity, when it's the reverse like this film it's considered perfectly acceptable. When Joseph Feinnes played Micheal Jackson in a recent biopic the show didn't even air because of the controversy but here historically white individuals are swapped to black in an act of virtue signalling and tokenism that is deployed solely to appease the few extremists that desire representation in film no matter how jarring or unnecessary.
Trust me, unlike Hollywood I actually respect the intelligence of ethnic minorities going to the movies, I assure you the overwhelming majority are going to be emotionally intelligent enough to know that a film set in Tudor Scotland isn't going to have ethnic diversity and additionally most would have an understanding that the film wouldn't need it, this is just the stuffy old movie trying to be 'woke' and coming across as desperate. Hollywood needs more black movies and new black characters, not the shoe-horning of ethnic minorities into historical dramas in the name of diversity.
It will never be ok for white actors to play black and you know it, just like it's not ok for black to play white, the main difference is when a black person plays a white role then that is deemed by certain spheres of thought to be 'progress.'
it's a shocking double standard but at least you admit it.
@laura p
Don't care? you commenting says otherwise, it doesn't exactly scream nonchalance and disinterest.
You say "there are certain cases where a white person should play a white character", I would say that a prime example of that is a historical film set half a century ago in Europe where everybody would have been white, would you not agree that this is one of those cases? Because Hollywood thinks otherwise.
omg with all the comments has no one considered it is colour blind casting ??
Harry Paul Political or artistic, There is a reason Hamilton still has a waiting list on Broadway.
Historical accuracy should be acknowledged.
I just don’t buy Margot as Elizabeth sorry.. feels too forced.. Saoirse an amazing actress tho
The bar has been set really high with past performances by stellar actresses. I think Saoirse should have played Elizabeth, she looks like her and Margot as Mary with a French accent rather than Scottish.
just so you know, Margot's Elizabeth plays the right looking age demeanor when Mary came back to claim Scotland. The Elizabeth played by Kate Blanchett depicts the queen's early years. Queens can show character without being loud or forceful, Margot's Elizabeth is more subdued, but I think she brings out a sort of tempered strength shown by monarchs who've ruled for years.
Same they should have use cate blanch. This movie would be perfect as a diamond.
@@ange7222 of course they can't use Cate for this film. In this time, Elizabeth is at 27 or above and Mary is 19. So its just right that they cast an actress who is at that age.
This looks good!
Also, Jesus Christ, they cast a black actor, it's fine
As a slave? Yes. As a member of the court? No.
I liked the movie however, it looses credibility with how inaccurate it was.
I was in that room lol
that fake nose is too distracting !!!!
She was not going to make her queen but ha was considering the fact to marry
Elizabeth had dark brown eyes.
This is Hallmark movie acting…
this movie is so good but so historically inaccurate, they thought that making a black man in this lovie would stop racism. but they this is so stupid if it has to be a historical movie based on true story they failed If i saw a car or something i wouldn't have been surprised. Elizabeth and Mary has never met and Henry wasn t gay, Rizzio neither. Great actors but so disappointed, a historian would feel offended. he studied all his life the queen Mary Stuarts life to see all his studied ruined and transformed.
Way too much blue worn in this movie.
Do people realize how ridiculous this is. Elizabeth l loathed blacks
Citation needed on that please :)
Um...no she didn't. Racism scarcely even existed back then, contrary to what we would automatically believe, as few ethnic minorities lived in England and there were no specific ethnic groups to target. How could people back then hate people they had never met? Elizabeth had many trusted foreign ambassadors from all over the world, of all different races, and was on good terms with the Sultan of the (then) Ottoman Empire and the Shah of Iran.
@@daisy-fu9lc She didn't hate blacks per say but she did often comment on how there were too many of them in London for her liking. When she said this though, she most likely wasn't referring solely to the group that we consider as black today.
to the producers not understand the institution of nobility??
no non-european would have been a noble in 16th century england.
Worst Queen Elizabeth ever and the accent. Off the aussie comes right thru
agree...aussie myself n agree.