Thanks for watching! Please let me know your thoughts below and if you would like to vote on which video topics I make videos on, please check out my Patreon page: www.patreon.com/historydecoded
This was interesting. My mother was from the Northern Norway. My sister had a dna test where it said 37% Irish Welsh Scottish. May your video shows the answer to this?
Hi, thank you for a great video. I am a Sami living in the northernmost part of Norway. My ancestors immigrated to Norway from the Kola peninsula, Finland, and Sweden, between 170-190 years ago. Because of a famine in northern Finland and Sweden at the time, many people moved north towards the arctic ocean. Sami people in my region are intermixed with the Kveni people of northern Scandinavia because of said immigration. Greetings from Norway.
I’m a 1st generation Australian of Scottish descent.I always knew I was descended from Scottish ancestors but when I did a DNA test it came back that I also had Norwegian DNA.I was contacted through ancestry by 3 second cousins from Scotland who helped me with our common ancestral lineage and it turns out my ancestors had come from the Orkney islands.In particular the island of Westray.I reckon it’s a fair bet that’s where my Norwegian DNA probably comes from.
Westray -> Vestrey -> Vestre øy/Vestøy Yeah i find names in northern Scotland amusing as a Norwegian(im also half Portuguese so my name is confusing I know)
A few years ago I watched a video on something about Scotland history. It had examples of real Scots speaking in different areas of the country. One man really caught my ear with his cadence that sounded very close to older Norwegians speaking English. I grew around a sizable number of Norwegian descents born in the 1880s-1890s, so I heard the "sing-song" cadence they used even when speaking English. I immediately picked up that Scottish man's speech..,"Hey that sounds very familiar." As I recall he was from some population pocket in northeast Scotland, not an island. This is so interesting how elements of our ancestors are still active today. My father's Dutch side were very bi-lingual Dutch-English but their Dutch sounded very harsh and guttural compared to today's Dutch of Europe. My Dutch great grandparents immigrated to the US about 1897, as did many others from the Rhine/Lower Rhine area in Gelderland. Long story short several years ago a study found there were still pockets of Old Saxon dialect between Arnhem and Utrecht. Spot on.!! That explained the mystery perfectly.
I was born in Scotland with my mother being from Yorvik ancestry going back 700 years. On my Fathers side he is English/ Scottish and part Norwegian on his father’s side. I found this video illuminating thank you brother. 😎💪🏴🇳🇴
That's really cool, my maternal grandfather's family came from one of the old Yorvik/Jorvik regions of Scotland in the late 1800s (the North-Western archipelago part of it, I believe, they were fishermen). His surname was a variant of Yorvik (Storvik, I think it was Jorvik at some point as well), which is also the name given to an area further north in Norway, where other parts of the same lineage settled during the same time-period. One fun anecdote about the whole thing is that since that part of Scotland and Northern England had some influences from Norway during the 800-1050-ish period, it turns out that the family had Scandinavian ancestry. This means that by migrating to Norway, they were in some ways coming home. I tried to find some relatives in Scotland a few years back, there are some who share my grandfather's name. I think there's a fair new in Northern England as well, at least that's what my grandfather told me.
I love these DNA presentations even when I don’t share any of their genetic background!! So interesting to see human migration patterns. Always on the move!!!! Thanks so much!
No! The "last Ice Age" did not end. We are STILL in an Ice Age. It's called the Quaternary Ice Age that started 2.8 million years ago and is still ongoing. What ended 12,000 years ago was the last glacial maximum. We are in the midst of an inter-glacial warm period which has characterized the Quaternary. Each glacial period lasts approximately 100,000 years and is punctuated by warm periods in between that last approximately 15,000 years. This cycle is governed by the Milankovitch Cycles. And for all of you obsessed over the climate, global temperatures have been trending colder during the Quaternary Ice Age - not warmer.
@@ysteinfjr7529 If you want to misuse the term "Ice Age", knock yourself out. But don't expect others to abide by your willingness to misuse terms. There is a BIG difference between an Ice Age and a glacial period within an Ice Age.
@@juliancate7089 We have always as long as I have remembered talked about the last glacial period that ended about 12000 years as "the Ice Age". That's not going to change.
I'm a little bit Norse but mostly Scott. I'm always looking out for the origin of mtDNA, HV0. It's usually lumped with something else and no one has a clue where it came from. I've seen it called an imperfect transition state, yet it has survived 30,000 years - Archaic!
@@franswiggers601 I'm Norwegian and yes we are absolutely not *that* far from eachother, although we are basically "northern germanic" so southern Germans are a bit more different. But there's actually many similarities under the surface, I went to somewhere in southern Germany and it didn't take so long before I oddly felt at home :) And for instance "Hans" is a common name in Norway too, my grandfather had that name. As well as so many other things, some words being just slightly changed from German, etc. etc.
I’m from Iceland so my ancestry is about 50/50 from Norway on the one hand and the British Islands and Ireland on the other. With my mtDNA most likely from Ireland (T2a1a8) and Y-DNA most likely from Scotland (R-Z39898). Interestingly I seem to have a dash of Savonian (Forest Finn) ancestry in there as well, though I suspect that it is slightly more recent and possibly via a back migration from New Sweden (Delaware) as it forms a DNA cousin cluster with a lot of people of NA and Colonial American descent. Plus some from the rest of Scandinavia, Northern Europe and Basque.
you forget that Norwegians also carry alot of dna from Ireland and Britain becaude of bothbtrade, colonies and trelldom/slavery. So Iceland is even closer to Norwegian, I see Iceland as brothers(I am Norwegian, fathers side, living in Norway) and Denmark, Sweden as cousins.
I have Norwegian Ancestry, Johannesburg Bernstein Vang and Olivia Hansdatter migrated to New Zealand from Norway to Norsewood in the North Island of New Zealand. I am going to trace my DNA and get more detail on my Nordic family.
"Merovinger" times created an influx into Norway that caused the culture and language to change. R1b dominated the coastline from their arrival pre Viking times.
I'm from northern Norway and I recently found out I have a great grandfather who was Kven (finnish norwegian). So I have a decent percentage Uralic in me :)
I am Russian, my wife is Norwegian from western Norway. We got 3 sons. After taking their dna it seems they all got some Irish and Scottish dna even tho we have no family from those places as far as we know. On the other hand could just be myheritage thing. Not the most reliable test
@@fiddibelow There is that. I myself am probably a Norse haplogroup through my MacDonald ancestry. But there's been a fair amount of traffic across the North Sea over the centuries. Everyone knows Grieg had Scottish antecedents but apparently Ibsen had some too. Roald Dahl too, though maybe take that with a pinch of salt, he claimed to be related to William Wallace!
@@colinmacdonald5732 Seen videos where some Russians get Irish/Scottish on myheritage as well as Norwegians. Strange test. As for McDonald, the question is, which came first. Is it R1a that traveled to Norway from Britain or the other way around.
My father line Tucker (Tooker) is under RYP5598 from south eastern norway with matches around Oslo and Hedmark Yp5598 is under R-z284 Scandinavian battle axe culture
Месяц назад+2
Funny, I know there's some village place called "Tokerud" in Norway. The last part, 'rud,' comes from a norse word meaning clearing, i.e. a place with forest cleared away for either farming or livestock. I.e. it's saying "Toker's clearing." :)
Thank you for sharing. That is pretty interesting. I have heard from other Norwegians that there are Tuckers/Tukkers/tokers around Oslo. It would be interesting to see if there's any connection. From what I've seen the prevailing theory of Toker/Tooker may be connected to names like Toki/Toka/Toke, Torquil or even thorkell. I've even seen some say it means thors kettle or helmet but who really knows. The funniest version I've seen is Toki means crazy in Swedish.
Medieval plagues took an extraordinary heavy toll in Norway and the country was to a degree depopulated. This and the Danish rule from 1380 (to a degree a result of the political collapse follwing the great plague of the 1350s) meant an increased immigration from the neighbouring contries, not at least Denmark. Even today Norwegian language (Bokmål) is a variant of Danish but in 19th century an "original" Norwegian was reconstructed (Nynorsk) but AFAIK is mainly talked around Bergen (no idea why).
The ethymology of Norway is unknown. It was uncertain a thousand years ago, so we know that it is unknowable. In Norwegian, the name could also mean the land of many fjords, which is at least as accurate as the way to the north, which seems like a detour. If it _does_ mean way to the north, then it implies that Sweden is part of Norway forever and by definition. There should be no such thing as The Nordics; it should all be called Norway. But we will not fight for it; when they want to be Norwegians, then they shall be and we will still call them Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. And it will no longer be called Norway, but Norge.
The Empire of Norge has potential. I think that Estonia would join and Lithuania, not to mention Scotland. But if Norway is going to lead the way anyway, why would someone want to _not_ join us? What would be your best argument against it? Chow Minh?
I appear to be a collision between Scandinavians and Celts. As I have mainly Scottish but also Irish and Welsh. Add in Norwegian, Swedish and Danish. A true mutt lol.
Thank you for this. I have some comments though. I doubt there was a British-Irish migration to Norway at some time. DNA similarities must come from the Anglo-Saxon migration to the British Isles. Anglers, Saxons and Jutes are the same breed as Norwegians and the connection between Norway and Denmark has always been strong and the haplo groups are almost the same in the two countries. Better climate and land opportunities in the British Isles lead to the same conclusion.
100% agreed!! South Scandinavians were the same bunch, most Norwegians were Danes or Sweds before becomming Norwegians, you could say, just look on the map. Obviously some Norwegian semen & eggs also came via the Viking era
Why are the brits so offended when it turns out it was a two-way migration? It seems it doesn't fit the current nationalist narrative.
Месяц назад+1
What about the "trells," the slaves around the time of the Vikings? Not to offend or anything, but honestly a lot of them supposedly came from the Irish and possibly a few Scots as well.
I happen to have hv9a mother lineage. Plus it correlates with Harald Hårfagre supposed genetic makeup. But half of Vestfold where his chieftain seat was, is said to be descendents. Because he slept around a whole lot? Anyhow, not that many in Europe has the unique hv9a. Harald Hårfagre's ancestry point towards some marriage that possibly could match hv9a based on maybe Iraq or somewhere in the middle east or around the Mediterranean. Greece or neighbors could be the connection with Harald Hårfagre's ancestry. There are also blue eyed people to be found in the middle east. Hårfagre's ancestry that I am pointing at is from Denmark around the year 700-ish. Nice video 👍😀
Bell Beakers are an off-shoot of Corded Ware. They didn't originate in Iberia. Iberia also received Bell Beaker input which brought in some Steppe and R1b. I posted this previously but a lot of people posting dna information on youtube don't appear to know the difference between the Bell Beakers that spread R1b and Steppe and the ancient Bell Beakers of Iberia which where Iberians and not people from the Steppe. Bell Beakers that went to Ireland and Britain were Dutch Bell Beakers and were all R1b-L21. It is quite possible that R1b-L21 also went to Norway during this Bell Beaker movement. All the R1b-L21 I doubt got there from Vikings bringing in Irish and British men during the Viking period. Some most probably also came with Beakers. The Beakers that went to Iberia in the Iron Age were all R1b-DF27. These Beakers brought R1b to Western Europe. The older Iberian Bell Beakers were a different population genetically than the Bronze Age Bell Beakers. The Beakers that brought R1b-DF27 to Iberia only came in the late Bronze Age Early Iron Age.
Thank you for this video about Norwegian ancestry. I feel like the odd one out, as my mt-haplopgroup is I3a, not very common in Norway. As far back as I can trace my maternal line, we have lived in the same area as far back I can find. I live in Trondheim, and the furterest I can com on this line is Johanna born in1754 along hte same fjord, only in the other end. She moved to Trondheim, and we have stayed ever since. Do you know where mt-I3a might origine from?
The Vandals came from south Norway and west Sweden until Vänern lake region. VendilaR means probably, the lesser people from *Vendiz cultunion.. (Vänern lake´s ancient name)..
R1b Distribution And Density In Europe R1b correlates with cloud density and density of precipitation. Higher the cloud density and density of precipitation the higher the percentage of R1b. Clouds and precipitation block Ultra Violet reducing UVB at ground level. Lower the ambient Ultra Violet level the higher the percentage of R1b. R1b Depigmentation of the skin being less Melanin in the skin thus the skin can produce Vitamin D3 more efficiently with low ambient Ultra Violet levels. Atlantic Climate Zone has the lowest ambient Ultra Violet levels due to cloud density and density of precipitation and is where R1b L21 Ginger MC1R proliferates. Ireland has a very very dense cloud cover ad the rain is more a dense drizzle than rain droplets thus the smaller the droplet of rain the higher the percentage of UVB blocked and the lower the ambient Ultra Violet levels on the ground. Density of cloud cover and density of precipitation and type of precipitation being a dense mist micro-droplets or dense drizzle being mini-droplets or dense rain being droplets has been ignored in genetic studies and this is a mistake as it will control the ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface. Ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface control the genetic history of the Northern Hemisphere as this influences the Vitamin D3 synthesis from direct sunlight on the skin. ===== ===== Skin Tone And Latitude And Ambient Ultra Violet Levels Zero Vitamin D3 During Pregnancy And Childhood Factor in the modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors. The brain will not develop correctly if the mother has zero Vitamin D3 during pregnancy when breast feeding and when the child is an infant and toddler and young child. Due to zero Vitamin D3 this will reduce the functioning IQ by at least 10% and probably 15% and possibly more than 20% and potentially more than 25%. Chronic mental instability in the teens and early 20's is the core reason zero Vitamin D3 when the mother had been pregnant and when the child had been growing up? From what I personally witnessed in sixth form where there had been a lot of students from India and Pakistan the mental instability had been due to zero Vitamin D3. One of the male students did not suffer from this chronic mental instability and he had been born in Pakistan and spent his childhood living in Pakistan until approximately 11 years of age thus it is reasonable to predict he had optimal Vitamin D3 levels when his mother had been pregnant and breast feeding and during his childhood. Also this male had very pale skin relative to the population of Pakistan and had been very short and slim thus in Britain should be able to produce some Vitamin D3. Very low Vitamin D3 is not zero Vitamin D3 although it is not ideal but very low Vitamin D3 is better than zero Vitamin D3. From what I have personally witnessed due to a combination of skin tone the modern lifestyle and specifically women covering their skin when outdoors in direct sunlight this explains the mental instability in the male population in Northern Europe for people with dark skin. Playing the race card all the time is one manifestation of mental instability. Males require significantly higher Vitamin D3 levels than female partly because men are nearly always heavier and Vitamin D3 levels is a ratio of the total body mass. But also as males have higher testosterone levels and testosterone burns off Vitamin D3 a lot faster than women who have vastly lower testosterone levels this amplifies the acute Vitamin D3 deficiency in males thus amplifies the side effects of Vitamin D3 deficiency encompassing mental health problems and physical health problems. The above goes a long way to explain why males are underperforming academically and almost all of them have chronic mental instability problems in school, sixth from and in their 20's. Vitamin D3 supplements are not the same as sun on your skin to produce natural Vitamin D3. However the IU (International Unit) dose guidelines are only guidelines and vary significantly with the individual. The significance of Vitamin D3 deficiency specifically zero Vitamin DD3 levels during pregnancy and when breast feeding and as an infant, toddler and thought-out childhood into adolescence has been excluded from the medical literature and the mainstream media for political reasons. However the facts remain the facts and personal opinions will not change the facts. Without the modern lifestyle people with dark skin could not live in Northern Europe due to a Vitamin D3 deficiency. Research must be carried out regarding are the official guidelines for Vitamin D3 supplements grossly underestimating the amount of Vitamin D3 supplement required and males require significantly more Vitamin D3 supplement than females due to elevated testosterone levels in childhood adolescence and into their 20's. Research project above. ====== In layman's terms zero Vitamin D3 in pregnancy results in brain damage of the newborn child and this brain damage is amplified if there is zero Vitamin D3 as an infant and toddler and throughout childhood resulting in acute behavioral problems in adolescence, The modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors. This goes some way to explaining what we witness throughout the West. ====== There is nothing more unequal than making unequal people equal. Black women on the nursing courses prefer coursework and do not like the exams for a plethora of overlapping reasons. White women on the nursing courses prefer exams and do not like the coursework for a plethora of overlapping reasons. The above are generalisations however is accurate to more than approximately 90%. Black males have elevated testosterone levels relative to Europeans and this elevated testosterone in real terms reduces the functioning IQ from what it would otherwise be. Although this IQ reduction varies with the person there is a significant education in functioning IQ due to black males having elevated testosterone levels. Zero Vitamin D3 In Black People Living In Northern Europe The modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors. Thus in Northern Europe due to a combination of low intensity sunlight due to the latitude and dense cloud cover and high levels of precipitation and strong winds from the Atlantic Storms and the rare occasion people are outdoors they are almost always wrapped up in clothing black people will have zero Vitamin D3 for almost the entire year. Black males require vastly more Vitamin D3 than the RDA (Recommended Daily Amount) due to them having elevated testosterone levels than European males. Black women living in Northern Europe have zero Vitamin D3 during pregnancy as this is the reason there are so many maternity problems for black women living in Northern Europe not racist NHS staff. Google Image Europe Geographic Area R1b And R1a There is clear boundary between the R1b and R1a populations and this correlates with density of cloud cover as the droplets that clouds are made of absorb Ultra Violet UVB that is required to make Vitamin D3 from contact with the skin. Thus R1b have more depigmentation of the sin than R1a being less melanin in the skin enabling them to produce Vitamin D3 more efficiently in Western Europe. R1b L21 Ginger MC1R is in the Atlantic Climate Zone as due to the Atlantic Climate the depigmentation of the skin from Ginger MC1R gene enables more efficient production of Vitamin D3 from the lower intensity Ultra Violet on the skin. However one of the many conclusions of the above is people with dark skin cannot live in Northern Europe due to the very low ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface. The negative health outcomes of zero Vitamin D3 encompassing physical health and mental health are well documented. Specifically pregnant omen with zero Vitamin D3 throughout their pregnancy the outcomes for the child are acute also encompassing physical health and mental health. Scientific fact are scientific facts and personal opinions will not change facts. ===== Comments welcome =====
No doubt a very intersting video whoever, the ascent combined; especial with the rapid-fire commentary, made it very difficult to understand. Speak slower, because not all your viewers are first language viewers, some are from Norway!!
So this is just about migration patterns right? and the DNA part is just a way of determining from what direction people migrated from? Isnt that the interesting part? and not the DNA part.. I find this fixation about DNA kinda stupid. As someone from Scandinavia I cant help but to notice how much people get off on it. Its weird.
The Uralic languages are insanely complicated. Started learning Finnish, but later gave up trying to get all the untold number of grammatical forms in my head. Impossible for a non-native speaker, IMHO.
Be patient and wait until all dust is settled down. Visitor engineers will make programmed unexpected expected ..never ever judge the book by its cover
@@celtichistorydecoded You lips were abnormally red. Could be lipstick. Could be chapped. I don't know but it was a little distracting. A little perspective though: One thing I really appreciate about your videos, thought, is the fact that it is you, with your accent, narrating the video, not some generic AI voice. THAT is often distracting enough that I will down vote the video and not actually watch the whole thing.
@@loke1555 So, feedback to the content creator is not allowed, unless it is simpering "yes man" drivel? If I noticed this I wonder how many others have noticed it, decided this guy has an agenda, stopped watching after the first couple of minutes and moved on, never to visit his channel again? Personally, I would prefer him to become more popular - someone who is not afraid to use his own (accented) voice rather than going with AI.
Well ... Norway comes from a old English word meaning north way ....? - not sure about that. Norway a asume comes from Norge/ Noreg and the scollars are not sure if it means the north way - or in fact the narrow way - Because of Harald Hårfagre/ Fairhair ( actually his calling name was Luva ( meaning a knitted wollen hat)- because he didnt cut or combe his hair - so he looked awfull) who had his seat on Avaldsnes near Haugesund - and there was this narrow shipslead to the north ... so we dont know - and most of the sami people in Norway now lives in Oslo....
Месяц назад+2
Norge/Noreg comes from "No-rige" just like Sweden's nordic name "Sve-rige." NORWAY is a different word, used in English, and does indeed come from North--Way or in other words, "the Way to the North." This is also pretty obvious. You could even translate directly to Norwegian and it would be "Nor(d)vei."
BULLSHIT.SPEAKING .THE NORWEGIAN VIKINGS WAS ALVAYS THE BEST .AND THIS LINKS IS STILL THERE .BUT YOU CANNOT SEE THE TROUGHT AND ADMITT THAT THE NORWEGIANS VIKINGS ARE AND WAS ALVAYS THE BEST IN FIGHTINGS AND EVERYTHING. BECAUSE IT IS TO SHAMEFULL FOR YOU TO ADMITE ..🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯THE NORWEGIANS NOT THE SWEDISH OR DANISH BUT NORWEGIANS VIKINGS ITWAS THE NORWEGIANS IT ALL STARTED WITH ..SHAME ON YOU TO DENY THE TROUGHT ❤❤🇸🇯🇸🇯🫎🫎🦣🦣🐻❄️🐻❄️🐏🐏🐐🐐🐎🐎🫎🫎🦌🦌
England is the land of Angles, a north German tribe. It was called „Engaland“ in old times. Parts of the Angles also settled in the middle of Germany. This area is called „Engilin“.
@@Yes-bk9cl They also say that Danish VIKINGS was taken the France today called Normandiee From old times.How comes it not been called Danishdee or Scandinaviadee. Yes i can tell you.Because of that this VIKINGS WAS MOSTLY NORWEGIANS FROM THE FAR NORTH .AND THEREFORE THE NAME IS ALSO NORMANDIE WICH NORWAY WAS CALLED VERY CLOSED TO THIS WORD.That to yells us a bit about the Qonquering of The North France From Norwegian VIKINGS.But also joyned with a few Danish .That have take much of the honor From the NORWEGIANS that is the really VIKINGS From the beginning From Norwegian Fjords.And the romers over all Europe speak about a Savage peopke From the far NORT NOT THE FAR DANMARK OR SWEDEN ..READ THE OLD SAGAS MY FRIEND AND NOT THE INTERNET.IN DETAIS I COULD TELL YOU MANY TING 🫎🫎🐴🐴🐴
@@sveintjsvoll5546 All barbarian folks coming from north , relative to the shores they made havoc on, were called northmen eg.Norwegians, Danes, Sweds ... and the discussion on Rollo's origion is still out these 🙂
*At least he is not outright claiming the first Norwegians were Blacks n' sheeet, as is now official history in Sweden regarding the first inhabitants.*
Black hair seems historically more connected to borders of Europe, closer to alien populations and parts of Russia, near Asia. Europeans may or may not have a natural source of black hair and darker browns hairs do seem to be historically in little warmer part of Europe with lighter shade farther north. When brown hair become light enough it can take on an almost blondish color. Used to have a couple different shades in my beard. Lighter shades of brown, that slowly matched up with the vast majority of hair.
Interesting facts, but the speaker has a terrible accent, difficult to understand. I am a long line of Swedish / Norwegian blood., from Kristiansand Norway, with ancestors from Hudiksval, Sweden.😊
That the Sami are a mixed people consisting of both Scandinavian hunter gatherers and immigrants from Asia/Urals is confirmed by archaeological and linguistic research, and does not contradict genetic research. There is continuity in archaeological finds, from the oldest finds (around 10,000 years old) in the north to today's Sami culture. Sami language consists of a large proportion of unknown origin. Linguists believe these are remnants of languages spoken in the Paleo-European area. Remnants of this/these (?) languages also exist in Norwegian (I assume they also exist in Swedish). Historian and gene researcher Sturla Ellingvåg, who has the YT channel "Viking Stories", has a well-founded theory he calls the "bottleneck" about Scandinavian genetics. Recommended to anyone who might be interested in the connection Scandinavian/Germanic.
@@acenname They were, actually. The group arriving from east were men, and not many. You can compare what happened in the north with what happened in the south. Those who immigrated brought the language with them. In the south the change of language actually happened to a greater extent than in the north. Norwegian is an Indo-European language with a very small proportion of the original language. In the north, the original language has been preserved to a much greater extent. Still, no one would claim that the Norwegians are from the Middle East, but they have no problem saying that the Sami are from the Urals or Asia, despite the fact that the ancestors of both peoples have been in the country since the ice retreated. A little later in the north than in the south, naturally enough, since the ice was gone in the south before the north. According to historian and gene researcher Sturla Ellingvåg Norwegians and Sami have more than 90% common genetic material.
@@ahkkariq7406 I think you got this slightly wrong. The first wave of hunter-gatherers came from the South, and were Western hunter-gatherers (WHG). They travelled all the way up the Norwegian coast,, reaching the Alta area. The second wave of hunter-gatherers came from the North. They were Eastern hunter-gatherers (EHG), coming from Siberia. They also travelled all along the coast of Norway, down to Southern Norway. They mixed with the WHG, but it was actually the EHG descendants' from the North that became the dominant culture along th entire coast. The Sami came in as a later, smaller wave, also from the North, also descendants of EHG. That happened after the Norse had adopted an Indoeuropean language due to a new wave, also from the South, of Western Steppe Herders (WSH), (who in turn were a mix of EHG and Caucasian CHG). Therefore, the Sami were primarily descended from the EHG, while the Norse were descended from the SHG and the WSH. Both groups have most of our ancient DNA from Asia.
@@acenname Over several decades, I have read everything there is to read about Sami history. This is in addition to the fact that I have studied Norwegian history. I have read studies, and in all these years have discussed Sami history online, including with people who have a doctorate in the subject. I have a better overview of this than most people who do not have specialist expertise on the subject. You don't have to believe me, but I stand firmly in my view on the matter. Sami ethnicity arose on Nordkalotten, as a fusion between those who lived there before and a small group of men who migrated in from the east. Whether those who lived on the site from before were more or less western or eastern hunter-gatherers is uninteresting in this context. My knowledge is not based solely on genetic research.
@@ahkkariq7406 Yes. By being uninterested in those who lived there before, as you say, and claiming continuity for the Sami, while forgetting to mention the continuity of people who descend from those who lived there before and are not Sami, (actually most of their descendants) you appear to be giving a biased comment.
There is a sami movie called the path finder where the sami fight against the invading chudes which some think are mongols. There are detailed records of vikings trading with the sami and vikings learning their ways of herding reindeer. Let's just say, from what i can see everytime i go to Sweden its that there are a lot more blond haired people there, most people in norway have a hazel/ muddy blond hair colour
This is wrong history of Norway..in 872 Norway was not yet a kingdom. But had many viking chiefs.. Norway was first called a Nation after the battle of Sticlestad where Olav the Holy, died in battle..in 1030. There we're No such thing as state back then.. and Norwegians are most people of germanic offspring.. arian race. King of Israel Ragnar Yahuwah ❤
Harald Hairfair, allegedly Olav's great-great-grandfather is regarded the first king of Norway. The exact date he became Norway's king is something that can be discussed but it must have been at some time during the late 9th century. You're not really wrong though. Harald may have conquered most of the Norwegian tribes but people didn't sudenly think of themselves as Norwegians rather than members of whatever tribe they belonged to. The took a while and it was indeed the Battle of Stiklestad that more than anything else cemented the national identity of Norway. Olav Tryggvason and Olav the Holy were two different people. Olav I Tryggvason was king of Norway from 995 to 1000. Olav II den Hellige was king of Norway from 1015 to 1028 (and then he spent two years trying to recapture the throne until he was killed at Stiklestad in 1030). Olav isn't an unusual name in Norway and we've had three more Olavs as kings since then. "Germanic" is a tricky word. Originally it was a name used by the Romans for any tribe that lived north or east of the Roman empire. Ethnicity had nothing to do with it. Later it became a name for a language group, again with no real ethnic implication although most (but not all) Germanic speaking tribes were related. It is not correct to say the Scandinavian people were of Germanic offspring. The Norse people had a lot of common ancestry with the Germanic speaking tribes in northern continental Europe but that goes all the way back to the western hunter gatherers, thousands of years before Germanic was a thing. The Aryans are also more of a language than an ethnic group. They are believed to be the first to speak an Indo-European language and seem to have originated in Persia and spread eastwards to India. They're still there. The name Aryan has the same roots as Iran, the current name of Persia. The proto-Germanic tribes must have picked up the Indo-European language and probably also Middle Eastern style farming techniques. But beyond that, there is no particular connection between the two groups; that's just something the German Nazis made up. I don't know why btw. You would have thought the Aryans were among the last people the racist Nazis would want to be associated with yet they were obsessed with it. They even sent "scientific" expeditions to the Aryan regions to find evidence the non-existent connection.
@@tessjuel you're mistaKing and it's not wise to try correct me Olav Trygvason and Olav the Holy is the same person.. he became this after they discovered his Nails had grown after death.. then he got the name Holy added.. King of Israel Ragnar YAHUWAH
I found out that I have Scandinavian ancestry by DNA test, mostly Norwegian. Most of my ancestry is Scottish (Highlands) - I am American, so I didn't know where my bloodlines came from. My haplogroup is H1h, supposedly. I would like to know more on that. I get told constantly that I look "Russian", even by Russians. I recently found out that the Highlanders came originally from Russia. 😊 thank you for the interesting video. GOD Bless. ♥️💚♥️
Highlanders didnt come from Russia. Where do you get that idea from? Theres no genetic or historical evidence of that. Ive not heard of haplogroups called H1h. There are mitochondrial haplogroups starting with H1 ( very common in western Europe ), and there are Y chromosome Haplogroups starting with H1 ( mostly from south west Asia ), but none that end in 'h.'
Thanks for watching! Please let me know your thoughts below and if you would like to vote on which video topics I make videos on, please check out my Patreon page: www.patreon.com/historydecoded
Very interesting thx
This was interesting. My mother was from the Northern Norway. My sister had a dna test where it said 37% Irish Welsh Scottish. May your video shows the answer to this?
Hi, thank you for a great video. I am a Sami living in the northernmost part of Norway. My ancestors immigrated to Norway from the Kola peninsula, Finland, and Sweden, between 170-190 years ago. Because of a famine in northern Finland and Sweden at the time, many people moved north towards the arctic ocean. Sami people in my region are intermixed with the Kveni people of northern Scandinavia because of said immigration. Greetings from Norway.
I was in Bergen back in the summer of 2007. Beautiful city and I love the Norwegian people. 🇳🇴
I’m a 1st generation Australian of Scottish descent.I always knew I was descended from Scottish ancestors but when I did a DNA test it came back that I also had Norwegian DNA.I was contacted through ancestry by 3 second cousins from Scotland who helped me with our common ancestral lineage and it turns out my ancestors had come from the Orkney islands.In particular the island of Westray.I reckon it’s a fair bet that’s where my Norwegian DNA probably comes from.
Westray -> Vestrey -> Vestre øy/Vestøy
Yeah i find names in northern Scotland amusing as a Norwegian(im also half Portuguese so my name is confusing I know)
A few years ago I watched a video on something about Scotland history. It had examples of real Scots speaking in different areas of the country. One man really caught my ear with his cadence that sounded very close to older Norwegians speaking English. I grew around a sizable number of Norwegian descents born in the 1880s-1890s, so I heard the "sing-song" cadence they used even when speaking English. I immediately picked up that Scottish man's speech..,"Hey that sounds very familiar." As I recall he was from some population pocket in northeast Scotland, not an island.
This is so interesting how elements of our ancestors are still active today. My father's Dutch side were very bi-lingual Dutch-English but their Dutch sounded very harsh and guttural compared to today's Dutch of Europe. My Dutch great grandparents immigrated to the US about 1897, as did many others from the Rhine/Lower Rhine area in Gelderland. Long story short several years ago a study found there were still pockets of Old Saxon dialect between Arnhem and Utrecht. Spot on.!! That explained the mystery perfectly.
I was born in Scotland with my mother being from Yorvik ancestry going back 700 years. On my Fathers side he is English/ Scottish and part Norwegian on his father’s side. I found this video illuminating thank you brother. 😎💪🏴🇳🇴
Thank you and thanks for sharing
That's really cool, my maternal grandfather's family came from one of the old Yorvik/Jorvik regions of Scotland in the late 1800s (the North-Western archipelago part of it, I believe, they were fishermen). His surname was a variant of Yorvik (Storvik, I think it was Jorvik at some point as well), which is also the name given to an area further north in Norway, where other parts of the same lineage settled during the same time-period. One fun anecdote about the whole thing is that since that part of Scotland and Northern England had some influences from Norway during the 800-1050-ish period, it turns out that the family had Scandinavian ancestry. This means that by migrating to Norway, they were in some ways coming home. I tried to find some relatives in Scotland a few years back, there are some who share my grandfather's name. I think there's a fair new in Northern England as well, at least that's what my grandfather told me.
Excellent as always! I'm enjoying this DNA series immensely.
Thanks, much more to come as well
I love these DNA presentations even when I don’t share any of their genetic background!! So interesting to see human migration patterns. Always on the move!!!!
Thanks so much!
You do share. You just have to go far enough back.
Thanks
I would LOVE to see the Finnish DNA episode sometime in the Future. TY
It's coming at some point, I'm looking forward to making it
No! The "last Ice Age" did not end. We are STILL in an Ice Age. It's called the Quaternary Ice Age that started 2.8 million years ago and is still ongoing. What ended 12,000 years ago was the last glacial maximum. We are in the midst of an inter-glacial warm period which has characterized the Quaternary. Each glacial period lasts approximately 100,000 years and is punctuated by warm periods in between that last approximately 15,000 years. This cycle is governed by the Milankovitch Cycles. And for all of you obsessed over the climate, global temperatures have been trending colder during the Quaternary Ice Age - not warmer.
Spot on correct👍
It's a question of definition. We can talk about many ice ages, or one ice age interrupted by interglacial, as we are in now.
@@ysteinfjr7529 If you want to misuse the term "Ice Age", knock yourself out. But don't expect others to abide by your willingness to misuse terms. There is a BIG difference between an Ice Age and a glacial period within an Ice Age.
@@juliancate7089 We have always as long as I have remembered talked about the last glacial period that ended about 12000 years as "the Ice Age". That's not going to change.
@@ysteinfjr7529 Again, don't care that you choose to deliberately misuse the phrase, just don't expect others to do the same.
I'm a little bit Norse but mostly Scott. I'm always looking out for the origin of mtDNA, HV0. It's usually lumped with something else and no one has a clue where it came from. I've seen it called an imperfect transition state, yet it has survived 30,000 years - Archaic!
Badass Viking MFs! ⚔️ Superb and informative video as always.
My Norwegian DNA comes from the island of Britain. Norwegian Vikings established settk Vikings established settlements in England & Scotland
Great video as usual
Thanks
should do Iceland and Faroe Islands next
We know that, it was Norwegian that got seasick and thrown ashore in these islands.
@@neinei5558😂
Always interesting and professional . Thank you Sir!!! ❤️
Thanks
To be honest, as a German. The Norwegians all look like the people in my village, like my family or friends.
They are our family.... 🥰
@@franswiggers601 I'm Norwegian and yes we are absolutely not *that* far from eachother, although we are basically "northern germanic" so southern Germans are a bit more different. But there's actually many similarities under the surface, I went to somewhere in southern Germany and it didn't take so long before I oddly felt at home :) And for instance "Hans" is a common name in Norway too, my grandfather had that name. As well as so many other things, some words being just slightly changed from German, etc. etc.
But some women in Norway definitely look better.😄
No
North Germany and Skandinavien are the same kind of people.
I’m from Iceland so my ancestry is about 50/50 from Norway on the one hand and the British Islands and Ireland on the other. With my mtDNA most likely from Ireland (T2a1a8) and Y-DNA most likely from Scotland (R-Z39898). Interestingly I seem to have a dash of Savonian (Forest Finn) ancestry in there as well, though I suspect that it is slightly more recent and possibly via a back migration from New Sweden (Delaware) as it forms a DNA cousin cluster with a lot of people of NA and Colonial American descent. Plus some from the rest of Scandinavia, Northern Europe and Basque.
I’m mitochondrial T haplogroup as well, my maternal line came from Sweden and possibly Finland before that. Hello from Norway
you forget that Norwegians also carry alot of dna from Ireland and Britain becaude of bothbtrade, colonies and trelldom/slavery.
So Iceland is even closer to Norwegian, I see Iceland as brothers(I am Norwegian, fathers side, living in Norway) and Denmark, Sweden as cousins.
I have Norwegian Ancestry, Johannesburg Bernstein Vang and Olivia Hansdatter migrated to New Zealand from Norway to Norsewood in the North Island of New Zealand. I am going to trace my DNA and get more detail on my Nordic family.
Norwegian, Norse, Norsewood, New Zealand, North Island..
N N N N NNNN NN N N nNnNnNnNNnnNnN.
Ha en fin dag!😂
"Merovinger" times created an influx into Norway that caused the culture and language to change. R1b dominated the coastline from their arrival pre Viking times.
Love from norway. I was born in Bergen and now live on an old island called Tjøme nearby our oldest city Tønsberg. 😊
Cheers thanks for the video
Cheers
I'm from northern Norway and I recently found out I have a great grandfather who was Kven (finnish norwegian). So I have a decent percentage Uralic in me :)
Good video
Thanks
My Grandparents immigrated to Minnesota from Norway before WW1.
Ha en flott dag! - Have a great day! 🙂🙂
takk
Farming in Norway started 4400 year ago at the same time in the north and south
I am Russian, my wife is Norwegian from western Norway. We got 3 sons. After taking their dna it seems they all got some Irish and Scottish dna even tho we have no family from those places as far as we know.
On the other hand could just be myheritage thing. Not the most reliable test
I did the same test and got 17% Eastern Europe the rest British Isles. And quite a lot of (distant) Norwegian cousins.
Myheritage isn’t actually half bad for Europeans. They’re notoriously unreliable for Americas of European descent.
Its because we settled in ireland and scottland so there will be some cross over
@@fiddibelow There is that. I myself am probably a Norse haplogroup through my MacDonald ancestry. But there's been a fair amount of traffic across the North Sea over the centuries. Everyone knows Grieg had Scottish antecedents but apparently Ibsen had some too. Roald Dahl too, though maybe take that with a pinch of salt, he claimed to be related to William Wallace!
@@colinmacdonald5732 Seen videos where some Russians get Irish/Scottish on myheritage as well as Norwegians. Strange test. As for McDonald, the question is, which came first. Is it R1a that traveled to Norway from Britain or the other way around.
My father line Tucker (Tooker) is under RYP5598 from south eastern norway with matches around Oslo and Hedmark
Yp5598 is under R-z284 Scandinavian battle axe culture
Funny, I know there's some village place called "Tokerud" in Norway.
The last part, 'rud,' comes from a norse word meaning clearing, i.e. a place with forest cleared away for either farming or livestock. I.e. it's saying "Toker's clearing." :)
Thank you for sharing. That is pretty interesting. I have heard from other Norwegians that there are Tuckers/Tukkers/tokers around Oslo. It would be interesting to see if there's any connection. From what I've seen the prevailing theory of Toker/Tooker may be connected to names like Toki/Toka/Toke, Torquil or even thorkell. I've even seen some say it means thors kettle or helmet but who really knows. The funniest version I've seen is Toki means crazy in Swedish.
@@corytucker6668tokig is the word in Swedish. I believe in that theory because I think about Tucker the traitor Carlsson. He is really crazy.
My mother in law was a direct descendant of the battle axe culture.
I had such a mother-in-law as well. 😮
My great grandparent was from Norway. Very cool
Medieval plagues took an extraordinary heavy toll in Norway and the country was to a degree depopulated. This and the Danish rule from 1380 (to a degree a result of the political collapse follwing the great plague of the 1350s) meant an increased immigration from the neighbouring contries, not at least Denmark. Even today Norwegian language (Bokmål) is a variant of Danish but in 19th century an "original" Norwegian was reconstructed (Nynorsk) but AFAIK is mainly talked around Bergen (no idea why).
The ethymology of Norway is unknown. It was uncertain a thousand years ago, so we know that it is unknowable. In Norwegian, the name could also mean the land of many fjords, which is at least as accurate as the way to the north, which seems like a detour. If it _does_ mean way to the north, then it implies that Sweden is part of Norway forever and by definition. There should be no such thing as The Nordics; it should all be called Norway. But we will not fight for it; when they want to be Norwegians, then they shall be and we will still call them Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Iceland. And it will no longer be called Norway, but Norge.
The Empire of Norge has potential. I think that Estonia would join and Lithuania, not to mention Scotland. But if Norway is going to lead the way anyway, why would someone want to _not_ join us? What would be your best argument against it? Chow Minh?
I appear to be a collision between Scandinavians and Celts. As I have mainly Scottish but also Irish and Welsh. Add in Norwegian, Swedish and Danish. A true mutt lol.
Thank you for this. I have some comments though. I doubt there was a British-Irish migration to Norway at some time. DNA similarities must come from the Anglo-Saxon migration to the British Isles. Anglers, Saxons and Jutes are the same breed as Norwegians and the connection between Norway and Denmark has always been strong and the haplo groups are almost the same in the two countries. Better climate and land opportunities in the British Isles lead to the same conclusion.
100% agreed!! South Scandinavians were the same bunch, most Norwegians were Danes or Sweds before becomming Norwegians, you could say, just look on the map.
Obviously some Norwegian semen & eggs also came via the Viking era
Why are the brits so offended when it turns out it was a two-way migration?
It seems it doesn't fit the current nationalist narrative.
What about the "trells," the slaves around the time of the Vikings? Not to offend or anything, but honestly a lot of them supposedly came from the Irish and possibly a few Scots as well.
I happen to have hv9a mother lineage. Plus it correlates with Harald Hårfagre supposed genetic makeup. But half of Vestfold where his chieftain seat was, is said to be descendents. Because he slept around a whole lot? Anyhow, not that many in Europe has the unique hv9a. Harald Hårfagre's ancestry point towards some marriage that possibly could match hv9a based on maybe Iraq or somewhere in the middle east or around the Mediterranean. Greece or neighbors could be the connection with Harald Hårfagre's ancestry. There are also blue eyed people to be found in the middle east. Hårfagre's ancestry that I am pointing at is from Denmark around the year 700-ish. Nice video 👍😀
My Norse history goes back to the eleventh century after tests and history after tests with DNA that came back with Norwegian with Russian DNA
I am a Norwegian with British DNA, found out after taking DNA test.
Bell Beakers are an off-shoot of Corded Ware. They didn't originate in Iberia. Iberia also received Bell Beaker input which brought in some Steppe and R1b. I posted this previously but a lot of people posting dna information on youtube don't appear to know the difference between the Bell Beakers that spread R1b and Steppe and the ancient Bell Beakers of Iberia which where Iberians and not people from the Steppe. Bell Beakers that went to Ireland and Britain were Dutch Bell Beakers and were all R1b-L21. It is quite possible that R1b-L21 also went to Norway during this Bell Beaker movement. All the R1b-L21 I doubt got there from Vikings bringing in Irish and British men during the Viking period. Some most probably also came with Beakers. The Beakers that went to Iberia in the Iron Age were all R1b-DF27. These Beakers brought R1b to Western Europe. The older Iberian Bell Beakers were a different population genetically than the Bronze Age Bell Beakers. The Beakers that brought R1b-DF27 to Iberia only came in the late Bronze Age Early Iron Age.
First class, I noticed it when I was there last year
Thank you for this video about Norwegian ancestry. I feel like the odd one out, as my mt-haplopgroup is I3a, not very common in Norway. As far back as I can trace my maternal line, we have lived in the same area as far back I can find. I live in Trondheim, and the furterest I can com on this line is Johanna born in1754 along hte same fjord, only in the other end. She moved to Trondheim, and we have stayed ever since. Do you know where mt-I3a might origine from?
Thanks for sharing. I'm not 100% sure but it may be connected to the Unetice culture
The Vandals came from south Norway and west Sweden until Vänern lake region. VendilaR means probably, the lesser people from *Vendiz cultunion.. (Vänern lake´s ancient name)..
Under the current impression I would have assumed sub Saharan ancestry
That is what they claim in Sweden. It is utter bullshit, but it seem impossible to talk to the people who think it.
Scandinavians are gorgeous people. I've never seen so many tall blondes. They match the snow.
R1b Distribution And Density In Europe
R1b correlates with cloud density and density of precipitation.
Higher the cloud density and density of precipitation the higher the percentage of R1b.
Clouds and precipitation block Ultra Violet reducing UVB at ground level.
Lower the ambient Ultra Violet level the higher the percentage of R1b.
R1b Depigmentation of the skin being less Melanin in the skin thus the skin can produce Vitamin D3 more efficiently with low ambient Ultra Violet levels.
Atlantic Climate Zone has the lowest ambient Ultra Violet levels due to cloud density and density of precipitation and is where R1b L21 Ginger MC1R proliferates.
Ireland has a very very dense cloud cover ad the rain is more a dense drizzle than rain droplets thus the smaller the droplet of rain the higher the percentage of UVB blocked and the lower the ambient Ultra Violet levels on the ground.
Density of cloud cover and density of precipitation and type of precipitation being a dense mist micro-droplets or dense drizzle being mini-droplets or dense rain being droplets has been ignored in genetic studies and this is a mistake as it will control the ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface.
Ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface control the genetic history of the Northern Hemisphere as this influences the Vitamin D3 synthesis from direct sunlight on the skin.
=====
=====
Skin Tone And Latitude And Ambient Ultra Violet Levels
Zero Vitamin D3 During Pregnancy And Childhood
Factor in the modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors.
The brain will not develop correctly if the mother has zero Vitamin D3 during pregnancy when breast feeding and when the child is an infant and toddler and young child.
Due to zero Vitamin D3 this will reduce the functioning IQ by at least 10% and probably 15% and possibly more than 20% and potentially more than 25%.
Chronic mental instability in the teens and early 20's is the core reason zero Vitamin D3 when the mother had been pregnant and when the child had been growing up?
From what I personally witnessed in sixth form where there had been a lot of students from India and Pakistan the mental instability had been due to zero Vitamin D3.
One of the male students did not suffer from this chronic mental instability and he had been born in Pakistan and spent his childhood living in Pakistan until approximately 11 years of age thus it is reasonable to predict he had optimal Vitamin D3 levels when his mother had been pregnant and breast feeding and during his childhood.
Also this male had very pale skin relative to the population of Pakistan and had been very short and slim thus in Britain should be able to produce some Vitamin D3.
Very low Vitamin D3 is not zero Vitamin D3 although it is not ideal but very low Vitamin D3 is better than zero Vitamin D3.
From what I have personally witnessed due to a combination of skin tone the modern lifestyle and specifically women covering their skin when outdoors in direct sunlight this explains the mental instability in the male population in Northern Europe for people with dark skin.
Playing the race card all the time is one manifestation of mental instability.
Males require significantly higher Vitamin D3 levels than female partly because men are nearly always heavier and Vitamin D3 levels is a ratio of the total body mass.
But also as males have higher testosterone levels and testosterone burns off Vitamin D3 a lot faster than women who have vastly lower testosterone levels this amplifies the acute Vitamin D3 deficiency in males thus amplifies the side effects of Vitamin D3 deficiency encompassing mental health problems and physical health problems.
The above goes a long way to explain why males are underperforming academically and almost all of them have chronic mental instability problems in school, sixth from and in their 20's.
Vitamin D3 supplements are not the same as sun on your skin to produce natural Vitamin D3.
However the IU (International Unit) dose guidelines are only guidelines and vary significantly with the individual.
The significance of Vitamin D3 deficiency specifically zero Vitamin DD3 levels during pregnancy and when breast feeding and as an infant, toddler and thought-out childhood into adolescence has been excluded from the medical literature and the mainstream media for political reasons.
However the facts remain the facts and personal opinions will not change the facts.
Without the modern lifestyle people with dark skin could not live in Northern Europe due to a Vitamin D3 deficiency.
Research must be carried out regarding are the official guidelines for Vitamin D3 supplements grossly underestimating the amount of Vitamin D3 supplement required and males require significantly more Vitamin D3 supplement than females due to elevated testosterone levels in childhood adolescence and into their 20's.
Research project above.
======
In layman's terms zero Vitamin D3 in pregnancy results in brain damage of the newborn child and this brain damage is amplified if there is zero Vitamin D3 as an infant and toddler and throughout childhood resulting in acute behavioral problems in adolescence,
The modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors.
This goes some way to explaining what we witness throughout the West.
======
There is nothing more unequal than making unequal people equal.
Black women on the nursing courses prefer coursework and do not like the exams for a plethora of overlapping reasons.
White women on the nursing courses prefer exams and do not like the coursework for a plethora of overlapping reasons.
The above are generalisations however is accurate to more than approximately 90%.
Black males have elevated testosterone levels relative to Europeans and this elevated testosterone in real terms reduces the functioning IQ from what it would otherwise be.
Although this IQ reduction varies with the person there is a significant education in functioning IQ due to black males having elevated testosterone levels.
Zero Vitamin D3 In Black People Living In Northern Europe
The modern lifestyle you are indoors almost all the time unless you actually work outdoors.
Thus in Northern Europe due to a combination of low intensity sunlight due to the latitude and dense cloud cover and high levels of precipitation and strong winds from the Atlantic Storms and the rare occasion people are outdoors they are almost always wrapped up in clothing black people will have zero Vitamin D3 for almost the entire year.
Black males require vastly more Vitamin D3 than the RDA (Recommended Daily Amount) due to them having elevated testosterone levels than European males.
Black women living in Northern Europe have zero Vitamin D3 during pregnancy as this is the reason there are so many maternity problems for black women living in Northern Europe not racist NHS staff.
Google Image
Europe Geographic Area R1b And R1a
There is clear boundary between the R1b and R1a populations and this correlates with density of cloud cover as the droplets that clouds are made of absorb Ultra Violet UVB that is required to make Vitamin D3 from contact with the skin.
Thus R1b have more depigmentation of the sin than R1a being less melanin in the skin enabling them to produce Vitamin D3 more efficiently in Western Europe.
R1b L21 Ginger MC1R is in the Atlantic Climate Zone as due to the Atlantic Climate the depigmentation of the skin from Ginger MC1R gene enables more efficient production of Vitamin D3 from the lower intensity Ultra Violet on the skin.
However one of the many conclusions of the above is people with dark skin cannot live in Northern Europe due to the very low ambient Ultra Violet levels on the earths surface.
The negative health outcomes of zero Vitamin D3 encompassing physical health and mental health are well documented.
Specifically pregnant omen with zero Vitamin D3 throughout their pregnancy the outcomes for the child are acute also encompassing physical health and mental health.
Scientific fact are scientific facts and personal opinions will not change facts.
=====
Comments welcome
=====
When learned how to sail 800 this era
Does it even make sense to look at DNA statewise?
Yes
Didn´t you forget the Bouvet island?
Norwegian Diaspora in Bangladesh, yeah right.
swiss DNA please !!!
England got Danish vikings. Scotland & ireland got Norwegian vikings.
I thought Northern part of England got Norw, vikings too?
@@JoanMaddieyes, engalnd is pretty mixed, all big invasions of england contained troops of both denmark and norway, even some from sweden too
In england at the time of the vikingraids/settlements, all vikings were labelled Danes; Swedes, Norwegians and Danes alike
England also has a bit of norwegian vikings
@@BoynamedMagnus183 northern england is pretty much just norwegian
Forgot Bouvet. 😅
germanic
Bouvet island is also norwegian
What accent is this? I don't understand a word he is saying 😮
No doubt a very intersting video whoever, the ascent combined; especial with the rapid-fire commentary, made it very difficult to understand. Speak slower, because not all your viewers are first language viewers, some are from Norway!!
The Bronze age was the best periode in Scandinavia
So this is just about migration patterns right? and the DNA part is just a way of determining from what direction people migrated from? Isnt that the interesting part? and not the DNA part.. I find this fixation about DNA kinda stupid. As someone from Scandinavia I cant help but to notice how much people get off on it. Its weird.
They go hand in hand.
Bangladesh?
The Uralic languages are insanely complicated. Started learning Finnish, but later gave up trying to get all the untold number of grammatical forms in my head. Impossible for a non-native speaker, IMHO.
It's not. Meet many who has learn to speak like native.😅
The genes were there
The picts
Be patient and wait until all dust is settled down. Visitor engineers will make programmed unexpected expected ..never ever judge the book by its cover
Good video. The lipstick was quite distracting, though.
What are you talking about?
@@celtichistorydecoded You lips were abnormally red. Could be lipstick. Could be chapped. I don't know but it was a little distracting.
A little perspective though:
One thing I really appreciate about your videos, thought, is the fact that it is you, with your accent, narrating the video, not some generic AI voice. THAT is often distracting enough that I will down vote the video and not actually watch the whole thing.
I know you think he's a handsome guy, but try to control your desires and listen to what he has to say instead.
@@loke1555 So, feedback to the content creator is not allowed, unless it is simpering "yes man" drivel? If I noticed this I wonder how many others have noticed it, decided this guy has an agenda, stopped watching after the first couple of minutes and moved on, never to visit his channel again? Personally, I would prefer him to become more popular - someone who is not afraid to use his own (accented) voice rather than going with AI.
Wtf is this guy smoking
the Saami are alot like the Native Americans of today
Oh right🫵
wtf is this language! i had to use subtitles O.O
Really? It’s English with a Scottish accent
Well ... Norway comes from a old English word meaning north way ....? - not sure about that. Norway a asume comes from Norge/ Noreg and the scollars are not sure if it means the north way - or in fact the narrow way - Because of Harald Hårfagre/ Fairhair ( actually his calling name was Luva ( meaning a knitted wollen hat)- because he didnt cut or combe his hair - so he looked awfull) who had his seat on Avaldsnes near Haugesund - and there was this narrow shipslead to the north ... so we dont know
- and most of the sami people in Norway now lives in Oslo....
Norge/Noreg comes from "No-rige" just like Sweden's nordic name "Sve-rige."
NORWAY is a different word, used in English, and does indeed come from North--Way or in other words, "the Way to the North." This is also pretty obvious. You could even translate directly to Norwegian and it would be "Nor(d)vei."
Yes, we called us self Noreg. And the english called us Norway.
England is a danish word meaning Meadow Land. Norway is Old Norse adopted by the english
BULLSHIT.SPEAKING .THE NORWEGIAN VIKINGS WAS ALVAYS THE BEST .AND THIS LINKS IS STILL THERE .BUT YOU CANNOT SEE THE TROUGHT AND ADMITT THAT THE NORWEGIANS VIKINGS ARE AND WAS ALVAYS THE BEST IN FIGHTINGS AND EVERYTHING. BECAUSE IT IS TO SHAMEFULL FOR YOU TO ADMITE ..🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯🇸🇯THE NORWEGIANS NOT THE SWEDISH OR DANISH BUT NORWEGIANS VIKINGS ITWAS THE NORWEGIANS IT ALL STARTED WITH ..SHAME ON YOU TO DENY THE TROUGHT ❤❤🇸🇯🇸🇯🫎🫎🦣🦣🐻❄️🐻❄️🐏🐏🐐🐐🐎🐎🫎🫎🦌🦌
England is the land of Angles, a north German tribe. It was called „Engaland“ in old times. Parts of the Angles also settled in the middle of Germany. This area is called „Engilin“.
@@Claude_van No - you are simply repeating the false schoolbook suggestion. Instead learn to think😉
@@Yes-bk9cl They also say that Danish VIKINGS was taken the France today called Normandiee From old times.How comes it not been called Danishdee or Scandinaviadee. Yes i can tell you.Because of that this VIKINGS WAS MOSTLY NORWEGIANS FROM THE FAR NORTH .AND THEREFORE THE NAME IS ALSO NORMANDIE WICH NORWAY WAS CALLED VERY CLOSED TO THIS WORD.That to yells us a bit about the Qonquering of The North France From Norwegian VIKINGS.But also joyned with a few Danish .That have take much of the honor From the NORWEGIANS that is the really VIKINGS From the beginning From Norwegian Fjords.And the romers over all Europe speak about a Savage peopke From the far NORT NOT THE FAR DANMARK OR SWEDEN ..READ THE OLD SAGAS MY FRIEND AND NOT THE INTERNET.IN DETAIS I COULD TELL YOU MANY TING 🫎🫎🐴🐴🐴
@@sveintjsvoll5546 All barbarian folks coming from north , relative to the shores they made havoc on, were called northmen eg.Norwegians, Danes, Sweds ... and the discussion on Rollo's origion is still out these 🙂
False propaganda!
The Sami did not arrive fro 9000 years ago, but in 1600
You speak oldvikin😊
……..?
I understand
*At least he is not outright claiming the first Norwegians were Blacks n' sheeet, as is now official history in Sweden regarding the first inhabitants.*
Black hair seems historically more connected to borders of Europe, closer to alien populations and parts of Russia, near Asia. Europeans may or may not have a natural source of black hair and darker browns hairs do seem to be historically in little warmer part of Europe with lighter shade farther north. When brown hair become light enough it can take on an almost blondish color. Used to have a couple different shades in my beard. Lighter shades of brown, that slowly matched up with the vast majority of hair.
Were you from Norway…? Noreg
Interesting facts, but the speaker has a terrible accent, difficult to understand. I am a long line of Swedish / Norwegian blood., from Kristiansand Norway, with ancestors from Hudiksval, Sweden.😊
That the Sami are a mixed people consisting of both Scandinavian hunter gatherers and immigrants from Asia/Urals is confirmed by archaeological and linguistic research, and does not contradict genetic research.
There is continuity in archaeological finds, from the oldest finds (around 10,000 years old) in the north to today's Sami culture.
Sami language consists of a large proportion of unknown origin. Linguists believe these are remnants of languages spoken in the Paleo-European area. Remnants of this/these (?) languages also exist in Norwegian (I assume they also exist in Swedish).
Historian and gene researcher Sturla Ellingvåg, who has the YT channel "Viking Stories", has a well-founded theory he calls the "bottleneck" about Scandinavian genetics. Recommended to anyone who might be interested in the connection Scandinavian/Germanic.
You make it sound as if the Sami were primarily descendants of Scandinavian hunter-gatherers.
@@acenname They were, actually. The group arriving from east were men, and not many.
You can compare what happened in the north with what happened in the south. Those who immigrated brought the language with them. In the south the change of language actually happened to a greater extent than in the north. Norwegian is an Indo-European language with a very small proportion of the original language. In the north, the original language has been preserved to a much greater extent. Still, no one would claim that the Norwegians are from the Middle East, but they have no problem saying that the Sami are from the Urals or Asia, despite the fact that the ancestors of both peoples have been in the country since the ice retreated. A little later in the north than in the south, naturally enough, since the ice was gone in the south before the north. According to historian and gene researcher Sturla Ellingvåg Norwegians and Sami have more than 90% common genetic material.
@@ahkkariq7406 I think you got this slightly wrong. The first wave of hunter-gatherers came from the South, and were Western hunter-gatherers (WHG). They travelled all the way up the Norwegian coast,, reaching the Alta area. The second wave of hunter-gatherers came from the North. They were Eastern hunter-gatherers (EHG), coming from Siberia. They also travelled all along the coast of Norway, down to Southern Norway. They mixed with the WHG, but it was actually the EHG descendants' from the North that became the dominant culture along th entire coast. The Sami came in as a later, smaller wave, also from the North, also descendants of EHG. That happened after the Norse had adopted an Indoeuropean language due to a new wave, also from the South, of Western Steppe Herders (WSH), (who in turn were a mix of EHG and Caucasian CHG). Therefore, the Sami were primarily descended from the EHG, while the Norse were descended from the SHG and the WSH. Both groups have most of our ancient DNA from Asia.
@@acenname
Over several decades, I have read everything there is to read about Sami history. This is in addition to the fact that I have studied Norwegian history. I have read studies, and in all these years have discussed Sami history online, including with people who have a doctorate in the subject. I have a better overview of this than most people who do not have specialist expertise on the subject. You don't have to believe me, but I stand firmly in my view on the matter. Sami ethnicity arose on Nordkalotten, as a fusion between those who lived there before and a small group of men who migrated in from the east. Whether those who lived on the site from before were more or less western or eastern hunter-gatherers is uninteresting in this context. My knowledge is not based solely on genetic research.
@@ahkkariq7406 Yes. By being uninterested in those who lived there before, as you say, and claiming continuity for the Sami, while forgetting to mention the continuity of people who descend from those who lived there before and are not Sami, (actually most of their descendants) you appear to be giving a biased comment.
Sorry mate,I can't understand what you're saying 😆
DiFIND MY AWIIFE
There is a sami movie called the path finder where the sami fight against the invading chudes which some think are mongols.
There are detailed records of vikings trading with the sami and vikings learning their ways of herding reindeer.
Let's just say, from what i can see everytime i go to Sweden its that there are a lot more blond haired people there, most people in norway have a hazel/ muddy blond hair colour
Denmark is also more blonde, but south Norway is very blond.
@filipefernandes870 Probably true, i'm from Trondheim so here its a very mixed bag, but generally lots of dirty blonde hair
Replying to the title: i hope they're human!😂😅😊
Yeah, we don't use English in America either. 😂
Old language
Heeee
They all have huns dna
No the huns were beaten by the dutch
@@fiddibelow the Dutch are huns
😅 so wrong
It looks like your using lipstick.
What percentage of Norwegian DNA is from sheep or goats? Just wondering.
None. They are not middle eastern.
subsaharan africans...wuz vikings
This is wrong history of Norway..in 872 Norway was not yet a kingdom. But had many viking chiefs.. Norway was first called a Nation after the battle of Sticlestad where Olav the Holy, died in battle..in 1030.
There we're No such thing as state back then.. and Norwegians are most people of germanic offspring.. arian race.
King of Israel
Ragnar Yahuwah ❤
Yeeeah, we don’t disregard Harald Hårfagre regardless.
@@pezlover1974 yeah,, but Olavs sirname was Trygvason.
King of Israel
Ragnar Yahuwah
Harald Hairfair, allegedly Olav's great-great-grandfather is regarded the first king of Norway. The exact date he became Norway's king is something that can be discussed but it must have been at some time during the late 9th century. You're not really wrong though. Harald may have conquered most of the Norwegian tribes but people didn't sudenly think of themselves as Norwegians rather than members of whatever tribe they belonged to. The took a while and it was indeed the Battle of Stiklestad that more than anything else cemented the national identity of Norway.
Olav Tryggvason and Olav the Holy were two different people. Olav I Tryggvason was king of Norway from 995 to 1000. Olav II den Hellige was king of Norway from 1015 to 1028 (and then he spent two years trying to recapture the throne until he was killed at Stiklestad in 1030). Olav isn't an unusual name in Norway and we've had three more Olavs as kings since then.
"Germanic" is a tricky word. Originally it was a name used by the Romans for any tribe that lived north or east of the Roman empire. Ethnicity had nothing to do with it. Later it became a name for a language group, again with no real ethnic implication although most (but not all) Germanic speaking tribes were related. It is not correct to say the Scandinavian people were of Germanic offspring. The Norse people had a lot of common ancestry with the Germanic speaking tribes in northern continental Europe but that goes all the way back to the western hunter gatherers, thousands of years before Germanic was a thing.
The Aryans are also more of a language than an ethnic group. They are believed to be the first to speak an Indo-European language and seem to have originated in Persia and spread eastwards to India. They're still there. The name Aryan has the same roots as Iran, the current name of Persia.
The proto-Germanic tribes must have picked up the Indo-European language and probably also Middle Eastern style farming techniques. But beyond that, there is no particular connection between the two groups; that's just something the German Nazis made up. I don't know why btw. You would have thought the Aryans were among the last people the racist Nazis would want to be associated with yet they were obsessed with it. They even sent "scientific" expeditions to the Aryan regions to find evidence the non-existent connection.
@@tessjuel you're mistaKing and it's not wise to try correct me
Olav Trygvason and Olav the Holy is the same person.. he became this after they discovered his Nails had grown after death.. then he got the name Holy added..
King of Israel
Ragnar YAHUWAH
@@tessjuel he would be the Holy Father of Norway then.. 😊
King of Israel
Ragnar YAHUWAH
Everyone knows Norwegians are Albanians.
swedish wanst realy vikings...
I found out that I have Scandinavian ancestry by DNA test, mostly Norwegian. Most of my ancestry is Scottish (Highlands) - I am American, so I didn't know where my bloodlines came from. My haplogroup is H1h, supposedly. I would like to know more on that. I get told constantly that I look "Russian", even by Russians. I recently found out that the Highlanders came originally from Russia. 😊 thank you for the interesting video. GOD Bless. ♥️💚♥️
Highlanders didnt come from Russia. Where do you get that idea from? Theres no genetic or historical evidence of that. Ive not heard of haplogroups called H1h. There are mitochondrial haplogroups starting with H1 ( very common in western Europe ), and there are Y chromosome Haplogroups starting with H1 ( mostly from south west Asia ), but none that end in 'h.'
Some celts do look Russian sometimes but they got nothing to do with Russia genetically speaking
Last I read, the H haplogroup is the most common mitochondrial haplogroup in Europe. They really reproduced and thrived. Lol
Wait,what? Are they WHITE?!? 🥸
from anatolia also most started there anyways.