JL Turbo vs V6 Offroad Compare | Which Jeep Wrangler JL Engine is Best?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 дек 2024

Комментарии • 281

  • @extremeterrain
    @extremeterrain  6 лет назад +4

    Subscribe for Daily Jeep Videos: terrain.jp/SubscribeXTyt
    Check out Parts for Your Jeep Right Here: www.extremeterrain.com/throttle-out-dec2018-3.html
    Which engine is in your JL?

  • @trl510
    @trl510 6 лет назад +282

    I just don't get these comparisons why not get the same body and all except the motor, since the motor is being compared. this is not even a comparison...

    • @walterwillis5351
      @walterwillis5351 6 лет назад +16

      Agreed - the reason he made it over the one spot in the 2 door where the 4 door could not - wheelbase difference. Front wheels were still on the rock when the rear hit the rock.

    • @alphaartisan
      @alphaartisan 6 лет назад +2

      No good

    • @captainsnarky6949
      @captainsnarky6949 5 лет назад +8

      Yep. This is the worst comparison video I've ever seen.

    • @melvin5818
      @melvin5818 4 года назад +2

      Yeah it is the best thing we got out of this video was how capable is a stock JL

    • @jacooosthuizen3593
      @jacooosthuizen3593 4 года назад +1

      Well if you cant make an clear pick out of the two from these two videos then who is to blame? Between the diesel and petrol which are rated almost the same what did you expect? Factor in Diesel Jeep cost more, turbo can eventually fail. id take the 3.6L anyday.

  • @series9193
    @series9193 6 лет назад +76

    Bad comparison of engines off-road when one is a 2 door and the other a 4 door the ground clearances are different and your comparing what they can do by way of engine performance but it’s a comparison of approach angle breakover etc.

    • @unixfool
      @unixfool 6 лет назад +5

      They weren't comparing crawling capability between the two vehicles...he said the multiple times. They were comparing how the engines responded to crawling.

    • @bobforpples
      @bobforpples 4 года назад

      Ron S
      Won’t a V6 with more weight(4 door) respond differently than if it had less weight(2 door)?

  • @thomasgarrison3949
    @thomasgarrison3949 3 года назад +13

    Thanks for the video. We are both retired & don't plan to do much rock crawling, except to get to some out of the way fishing sites. For our 30th wedding anniversary, we decided that pearls weren't useful, It is much easier to pull our fishing boat with a 4x4 than a string of pearls! So, we bought our first Jeep, a Sarge Green, 2021 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport, 4 door, 2.0 turbo, the black, 18" stars for the front doors are finally in at the dealership, where they will have them put on, for us, next week. This Jeep will be driven in parades, up here in NE Indiana, with the American Legion & the Disabled American Veterans.

  • @MikeFallen13
    @MikeFallen13 6 лет назад +47

    I'd stay away from the 2.0 for at least a few years to see how they hold up, I just don't see the point in risking potential issues when the 3.6 has proven to be a very reliable engine and really has no discernible differences in performance. I'm not saying the turbo is a bad motor, and I personally like when manufacturers offer a variety of different choices, but Id rather have someone else figure out its a dud rather than have issues myself.

    • @rahulreddy9045
      @rahulreddy9045 6 лет назад +13

      Calling the 3.6 reliable is a stretch

    • @robertgoins7933
      @robertgoins7933 6 лет назад +5

      The 2.0 turbo hurricane motor isn't new. It's been around for a while...

    • @rodpalmer4652
      @rodpalmer4652 6 лет назад

      @@robertgoins7933 Is this an actual Chrysler engine, or is it sourced from Europe?

    • @viper7981
      @viper7981 6 лет назад +6

      My father is an engineer that works on these engines and he said he would laugh if I were to get a 2.0 Turbo. He continuously tells me that it is a "junk motor" and the models this year and the next are mainly to test the capabilities of the turbo.
      Please. If you are an enthusiast, please get a V6 so that you will not be disappointed.

    • @robertgoins7933
      @robertgoins7933 6 лет назад +11

      @@viper7981 Your dad is wrong.

  • @merendeztorres1026
    @merendeztorres1026 6 лет назад +8

    I just got my first Jeep 4 door 2.0 i4 turbo Wrangler JL and can’t wait to see what kind of mods you do so I can see what mods I could do to mine as well

  • @thecappy
    @thecappy 6 лет назад +9

    I was going to wait for the diesel, but I went V6. I've only ever had problems with turbos. Vacuum hoses crack, carbon deposits, fins blades brake. Had an subaru STi turbo that basically turned into a grenade.

    • @unixfool
      @unixfool 6 лет назад +4

      Gi flip side is, I'm coming from a 2011 STI. I had not a single mechanical issue the 7 years I owned it. Definitely not shit. This is my third turbocharged car. If you take care of turbocharged cars, they'll be fine.

    • @DimplesChild401
      @DimplesChild401 2 года назад

      Exactly. I’ve known people to put regular and MidGrade fuel in Turbos and complain about performance. I say don’t buy a Turbo if you’re going to put cheap gas in it and not keep up with your maintenance.

  • @1972mercurycougar
    @1972mercurycougar 4 года назад +5

    Best thing you can do for, any lesser Wrangler, is make sure you order Anti-Spin Differential. With solid tires, it really helps. Nobody wants to spend the 600 bucks, but wishes they did while wheeling, in snow. Just my personal opinion.

  • @1BadVan
    @1BadVan 2 года назад +16

    I test drove both the 2.0 and the 3.6. The 2.0 definitely feels more peppy, kicks you back more. But we prefer the smoother powerband of the 3.6, much nicer and quieter engine note of it as well. Plus long term reliability I trust the 3.6 more.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  2 года назад +3

      Same feeling when I drove the 2.0L compared to the 3.6L! I ended up choosing my turbo though. Plus having the Wrangler as a lease helps take the worry away from long term reliability. 😉 -Zach

    • @Skiper_31
      @Skiper_31 2 месяца назад +1

      Yo tengo el 2019 Jeep turbo ​@@extremeterrain

  • @EFFTrudeau-001
    @EFFTrudeau-001 6 месяцев назад +1

    2019 JL 2.0 here and just did a 200km trip where I got 34.5mpg avg

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  6 месяцев назад

      I had a 2018 with the 2.0L and loved it! Great power and even better MPGs for a Wrangler. -Zach

  • @hghori1
    @hghori1 6 лет назад +4

    I have to say watching this from the sand dunes of Abu Dhabi the real test in our backyard is climbing really tall dunes. That’s when you will really get the difference between the two engines

    • @Dubai892JK
      @Dubai892JK 6 лет назад +1

      Exactly, that's the proper way of testing engine capability. Otherwise just moving a vehicle over few rocks is not a big deal.

  • @BeingInTheMessiah
    @BeingInTheMessiah 6 лет назад +6

    High rpms and little airflow runs hot on the 3.6 it would be interesting to see how the turbo survives repeated off road use

    • @indridcold8433
      @indridcold8433 5 лет назад +3

      That tiny engine with a turbo is nothing buy a grenade waiting to explode. Traditionally four cylinder engines and turbos make for a short lasting engine, unless it is a diesel.

    • @TheSchmed
      @TheSchmed 4 года назад +4

      Indrid Cold yep, let’s see 100k miles later, a blown out 4 cyl turbo vs a just broken in 3.6 V6.

  • @mct8888
    @mct8888 5 лет назад +24

    Next week we'll compare a Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4x2 with a Range Rover.

  • @phillipcraggs6202
    @phillipcraggs6202 6 лет назад +3

    in low range, HP and torque are less of a factor, the whole point of low range is to use less power from the engine. try the same in Hi range

  • @davidtwa8492
    @davidtwa8492 5 лет назад +4

    2 door 2.0 liter vrs a 4 door with a v6 with the same horse power diffrent tourque you needed to compare 2 2 doors with diffrent engines

    • @cartermackenzie1135
      @cartermackenzie1135 4 года назад

      With a cold air intake and a mishimoto intercooler pipe and the jb4 tune my Jeep’s 0-60 is around 5.8 seconds on 91 octane. With a 4.10 gear swap or meth injection I bet it would be faster than a v6 with the prodigy performance turbo kit

  • @rubencampos1873
    @rubencampos1873 4 года назад +1

    Make sure you change the headlights before you add the front bumper and winch

  • @AngelRodriguez111
    @AngelRodriguez111 6 лет назад +6

    What gearing does each vehicle have? is it the same?

  • @chefmarcos
    @chefmarcos 6 лет назад +6

    Why compare a 2 door and a 4 door? All that effort and they couldn’t have 2 of the same model?

  • @brucebailey8048
    @brucebailey8048 6 лет назад +9

    Love jeep wranglers but, the new ones scare me: Jeep JL
    Earlier this month, Fiat Chrysler announced a recall for over 18,000 2018 and 2019 Jeep Wranglers because failing welds were causing a critical suspension mounting bracket to detach from the frame. Now we have the instructions for how Fiat Chrysler plans to fix the bad frames, which the company said could cause some Jeeps to “crash without prior warning.”
    Between May 7, 2018 and Aug. 21, 2018, Jeep’s Toledo North Assembly Plant used frames with an “off seam [track bar] weld location” to build up to 18,055 new Jeep Wranglers. The result, Jeep says in its NHTSA Safety Recall Report, is that likely around 720 vehicles (4 percent of the recall population) have track bar brackets that could potentially “[separate] from the frame.” This sounds like something you’d never really want to happen to your vehicle for a number of reasons, but Jeep identifies that it could possibly lead to reduced steering response and even a crash.
    Fiat Chrysler previously told Jalopnik that it planned to inspect all 18,000+ vehicles, but now-thanks to dealer service instructions posted to a Jeep JL owner’s Facebook page-we know how the company will actually fix the roughly 720 cars it expects to find with bad welds.
    The first step for dealers is to lift the vehicle and check out the build date code on the frame. If that number is greater than or equal to 126 and less than or equal to 156, then the vehicle was built in the May 7, 2018 to Aug. 21, 2018 window, and its owner should be offered a loaner car as the Jeep gets inspected further.
    Vehicles with frame codes in that range will then have their track bar bracket welds-both the inboard and outboard ones-cleaned. From there, with the steering wheel cranked to the left to help give better access, dealers will paint the vehicle’s three-digit VIN to the outboard frame bracket, and take a picture of both welds like so:
    Those pictures, along with the frame build date code, the vehicle’s VIN, and the dealership’s information, will be sent to a “Track Bar customer care representative,” who will take a close look at the welds’ positions.
    If the representative looks at the photos and determined that the welds are in the right spot, then the Jeep is all set, and no repair will take place. But if he or she finds one or both of the welds to be out of place, dealers will arrange to have a “Technical Weld Specialist” come to make the weld repair. But before that can happen, the dealer has to take some stuff apart.
    To prep the outboard weld to be repaired by the weld specialist, dealers are asked to disconnect the battery before lifting the Jeep, remove the left front wheel, undo the track bar nut and bolt shown above, and then take the track bar off of the poorly-welded bracket on the frame.
    From there, Fiat Chrysler says its “Technical Weld Specialist will perform the repair on the outboard weld.” There are no further details on how exactly the specialist will conduct the fix, but clearly the job will involve welding that bracket back onto the frame somehow. Fiat Chrysler told me via email simply: “Weld will be made to comply with specs.”
    Once the weld specialist’s job is done, dealers will bolt the track bar back onto the frame (with a new nut and bolt), throw the wheel back on, lower the Jeep, torque down the track bar nut to spec, and then give the vehicle back to the customer. That is, unless the inboard weld also needs to be fixed.
    Repairing the inboard weld is significantly more involved than fixing the outboard one. In addition to lifting the Jeep and removing the left front wheel, the air dam has to be taken off, and four steering gear mounting bolts have to be removed (to get the steering gear box away from the bracket weld location) after the track bar has been unbolted from the frame bracket:
    Each sway bar link’s lower nut and bolt also have to be taken out, likely to get the sway bar out of the way. Then, by grabbing the right front wheel and turning it, the vehicle’s wheels need to be pointed to the rightmost position. This will pull the steering gear away from the frame, and thus away from track bar bracket to give better access to the inboard weld.
    That’s when the Technical Weld Specialist will perform the inboard weld repair, or possibly replace the entire bracket.
    With that done, dealers will grab the front right tire, and turn the steering linkages to the leftmost position in order to line the steering gear back up with the mounting holes in the frame. New bolts will then be threaded into the steering gear and torqued down.
    A new bolt will hold the track bar into the newly-welded (and possibly entirely new) bracket, and new bolts will be used to hook the bottoms of the sway bar links back to the steering knuckles. The wheel will go back on and get torqued to spec, then the vehicle will be lowered, and the sway bar and track bar bolts will be tightened.
    Once dealers install the air dam, do an alignment, and check the work via a test drive, the Jeep will be all fixed and ready to go back to the customer.
    Jeep lists how much time dealerships can bill to each procedure in the table below:
    So if you’ve got a 2018 or 2019 Jeep Wrangler affected by the recall, now you know what type of surgery might be in its future.

    • @Ang.0910
      @Ang.0910 5 лет назад +2

      Bruce Bailey holy shit that’s the longest comment I’ve read! Thanks for the info tho!!

    • @narssasisticasshole3255
      @narssasisticasshole3255 5 лет назад +1

      At least they are fixing it and the newer jeeps are better now

    • @craigversetti5700
      @craigversetti5700 5 лет назад

      WOW !!! Now that's a comment , however im definitely more educated now . Im curious what i need to do , where to go or what to join to get information and news like you just shared ? Thx

  • @777lukasz9
    @777lukasz9 6 лет назад +9

    2.0 Maintenance requires changing spark plugs every 30k. Look it up. I'll pass on this turbo direct injected FCA motor.

    • @SoManyBasses
      @SoManyBasses 6 лет назад +6

      Gasp.....not the spark plugs!!!

    • @denoex2362
      @denoex2362 6 лет назад +6

      Wrong. It’s 60k for the 2.0L. 100K for the 3.6L. I have the manual open in front of me.

    • @777lukasz9
      @777lukasz9 6 лет назад +1

      @@denoex2362 The guy used a dealer connect website to show the maintenance schedule. "2.0 turbo and 3.6 maintenance schedule, Fluids and capacities 2018 Jeep JL Wrangler" watch that video. Every 30K for 2.0 turbo.

    • @denoex2362
      @denoex2362 6 лет назад

      777 Lukasz I just watched that video, and I will email an FCA corporate contact I have tomorrow to see if they can clarify. 3rd Edition Rev 2 of the full owner’s manual says 60k and the MOPAR owner’s portal says 60k as well. I would be surprised if the 30k interval isn’t a mistake.

    • @denoex2362
      @denoex2362 6 лет назад +4

      It took a while but I finally heard back from my contact, who is an “Executive Referral Manager” at FCA. Response pasted below:
      “Per your inquiry regarding the spark plug maintenance interval, I consulted with Engineering for confirmation. I was told the spark plugs should be changed every 60,000 miles.
      The dealership's portal and the owner's portal will be updated to be consistent with this information. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.”

  • @Alwaysgotafighterschance
    @Alwaysgotafighterschance Год назад

    It's 2023 and Australia is bringing out the 2.0 for 2024 models. In this day an age if you had another 2.0L what performance mods would you recommend doing to get abit more power out of it. Ie intake, ecu chip, exhaust etc etc from your experience as this is all new for us Australians

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  Год назад +1

      Mishimoto has a really cool intercooler pipe which lets you get more air to your turbo easier, I had it on my 2.0L JL and it was great! Pair that up with a cold air intake, cat-back exhaust and a piggyback tuner and you'll be seeing plenty of extra power. -Zach

  • @slomango7927
    @slomango7927 5 лет назад +3

    The 2.0l would be much better if it also had port injection which is doesn’t. The intake valves will gum up around 60k miles and have to be walnut blasted. This is why every other manufacturer is going with both direct and port injection ie. ford, Toyota, etc. If you factor in this maintenance item you will be fine 👍

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  5 лет назад +2

      The 2.0L actually has oil-separators installed from the factory, and so far many owners with aftermarket catch cans have reported not getting much blow-by, if any! From what I've seen (so far anyway, time will show longevity of these 2.0Ls) if you use high quality oil and keep up with your maintenance intervals we should have a solid engine choice here. -Zach

    • @TheSavage3.6
      @TheSavage3.6 11 месяцев назад

      the 3.6 is much more reliable

    • @slomango7927
      @slomango7927 11 месяцев назад

      @@TheSavage3.6 this comment thread is 4 years old 😂

    • @TheSavage3.6
      @TheSavage3.6 11 месяцев назад

      @@slomango7927 You still responded

  • @TheKarmaKrash
    @TheKarmaKrash 5 лет назад +2

    Is there a video list of what you ended up doing with your 2 door?

  • @fishndad63
    @fishndad63 6 лет назад +1

    I agree with other comments. I opted for 3.6L on the 2 door sport. I just cant be a fan of a 4 cylinder (with or without turbo) I was hoping to see if my decision paid off!
    Also, maybe I've read it wrong, but the v6 has 285 HP and 260 ft lbs torque. ;)
    The 2.0 L has 270 hp with an impressive 295 ft lbs of torque. I admit I am old school and did not want to rely on a turbo for the life of the motor.

    • @Dubai892JK
      @Dubai892JK 6 лет назад +1

      Just an advice for life, whenever looking at engines stats... Pay attention to what RPM these figures are achieved.. Most of the time they are misleading

  • @CharlesB46
    @CharlesB46 6 лет назад +9

    Everyone stating turbo needs more revs in the thread need to get educated on current turbos. This is one of the benefits of a turbo! more torque at lower revs. This isn't 1980.

    • @evanwilliams8087
      @evanwilliams8087 5 лет назад

      Charles Beeler The guy in the video said on the Dyno, the torque numbers were only available at higher RPM

    • @8w494
      @8w494 5 лет назад +1

      Turbos, even small efficient ones, have lag. Without having seen the dyno charts, I'd bet one would not notice any real world difference between a boosted and NA 2L below 3k RPM.

    • @indridcold8433
      @indridcold8433 5 лет назад +1

      A tiny four cylinder petrol powered engine with a turbo is asking for a cracked cylinder head. New technology nor not, the cylinder head is still too small to successfully handle the pressures of a turbo for any extended period of time. Is this a planned obsolescence? There is no way that tiny engine with a turbo is going to get to 175,000 miles. It is a grenade waiting to explode.

    • @Shad0wC0mpany2
      @Shad0wC0mpany2 5 лет назад +1

      this ☝🏻

  • @Realeyesrealizereallies15
    @Realeyesrealizereallies15 3 года назад +1

    I love the 21 Sahara turbo. It’s so quick

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  3 года назад

      I have a 2018 2.0L and its definitely fast for a Wrangler! -Zach

  • @petevitale1416
    @petevitale1416 2 года назад +1

    Need Wildpeak Falken AT3 w tires .

  • @richystar2001
    @richystar2001 6 лет назад +1

    High compression turbo direct injection will carbon up with gunk after long term use then they will develop knock after 130 000 miles. Plus you can only use Premium gas to get high performance and mpg. Stay away from the 2.0l turbos with high mileage. Because an engine replacement will be in your future.

  • @jefferyrobinson9984
    @jefferyrobinson9984 3 года назад

    I've noticed with the 4 cylinder it uses or burns more oil and the oil level has to be checked frequently and topped off. The 6 doesn't burn any oil and maintains its proper oil level until its changed and doesn't work as hard. Is this your experience as well. Oh to note these examples with the 4 is in the 2014 and 2015 Cherokee Limited and the 6 is from my 2018 Cherokee Overland. My 4 from my past 95 Wrangler stick was dependable and fun to drive but also felt like it worked harder (higher rpms of course). I also love my 21 Gladiator High Altitude with the automatic 6 cylinder. Thanks for any input.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  3 года назад +1

      I've been using a two-door 2018 JL 2.0L as my daily driver since February of 2019 and I have *not* noticed any substantial oil consumption in between oil changes after 26,000 miles of driving. Granted I'm in southeastern Pennsylvania so elevation hasn't been that much of an issue. As far as I'm concerned, as long as you run quality full-synthetic oil and change it every 3,000 to 5,000 miles you shouldn't have any issues with these little turbos. -Zach

  • @onefastcyclist
    @onefastcyclist 6 лет назад +3

    impressive for stock jeeps with street tires - now try a YJ with the 4.0 in-line 6 without traction control to discover how great it was. I assume your going through the Metalcloak catalog for your upcoming JL mods?

    • @indridcold8433
      @indridcold8433 5 лет назад +1

      Unfortunately, if he tried a YJ with a 4.0 inline six engine without traction control as a comparison to the JL, he will feel as if he was robbed.

    • @RKmndo
      @RKmndo 2 года назад +1

      Considering that a lunchbox locker for a YJ/TJ is only around $400US, I think he'd come out ahead with a $3K-$6K 4.0L YJ/TJ, for offroad abuse. They're simpler and narrower. The I6s are tractor motors. 33x10.5s fit with just TJ Rubicon flares and a 1" polyurethane bodylift. A 1" MML then allows high-clearance skids too.
      High-clearance, low COG, and 6" narrower...on a small budget.

    • @onefastcyclist
      @onefastcyclist 2 года назад

      @@indridcold8433 Having wheeled both, I'm confident that Skill, good tires, and a switchable locker will get that old 6 (with great low end torque) just as far up a trail as any newer Wrangler with traction control

    • @indridcold8433
      @indridcold8433 2 года назад +1

      @@onefastcyclist I am getting a front lunchbox next week. The rear will have to stay factory limited slip a bit longer. My rolling time capsule has had a lot of mud adventures. But, I have never had any locker. I must have read about a hundred articles over which axle to put a locker into it. I watched several videos also. Since the rear axle had a limited slip anyway, I went with the front lunchbox. Tyres are 33x12.5 R15 Dick Cepek Extreme Terrain on stock 15x8 Canyon rims on 2.5 inch spacers. (I know, yuck spacers! But never had a problem with them) To get the Extreme Terrains to fit, SkyJacker 4.5 inch lift that I put in completely alone with had tools. To stop all the issues with heat, I got hood louvers, a three tank aluminum radiator with electric fan. To combat the night at extreme rural locations, a slew of lights: Two KC stock lookalike LED headlight retrofits, two under fender spot lights, two flood lights at windshield level spot lights, two ditch lights, eight inch fog lights, 52 inch Cree light bar, two six inch LED reverse lights. Communication is a vintage Cobra 148GTL CB on a 102 inch antenna and an off brand HF/VHF/UHF transceiver on an off brand dual band antenna. It looks quite overdone at first glance. But it is all cheap upgrades and modifications. I have had it a very long time.

    • @garyvanmeter4911
      @garyvanmeter4911 2 года назад

      @@indridcold8433 How did the front locker work out? My lifted 1986 XJ/4cyl /5 spd manual went everywhere with a just a rear factory LSD (until it went over backwards at MOAB, cartwheeled, then over a cliff) . The Rubicon trail was easy with it. But my lifted !993 with 4.0L/auto is not as sure footed. So I have considered a front lunchbox locker. My 93 does not have the front axle disconnect. If I install a front lunchbox will it have good street manners while in 2wd and do far better in 4wd?

  • @jamieeisenhower1560
    @jamieeisenhower1560 Год назад

    You should have done a better review with two 2 door ones. Are two 4 door ones with 2.0 and 3.6

  • @TomTom-wro
    @TomTom-wro Год назад

    Im not sure this was a fair compare just because of the weight 3 door vs 5 door has. I agree that tires used were as bad as they could have been in both cars including all-season which isn't optimal for snow & ice. For my taste and family usage I bought a 5 door Rubicon Recon which has on board Dana 44 axles front & rear plus enforced front differential. Of course, 3.6 V6 engine.

  • @derek6947
    @derek6947 5 лет назад +5

    Downside of the 2L is it requires premium gas vs. regular gas for the 3.6L. The better gas mileage for the 2L does not cover the higher fuel cost.

    • @dono4598
      @dono4598 5 лет назад +3

      I have 2.0 '19 Sahara and it does not require premium. The manual says mid range is perfectly fine however if you notice any engine knock to run a tank of premium. Believe me, I would not have purchased the 2.0 if it required premium. I also thought that this was required but its not. Also if it required premium it would indicate this on the fuel door and it doesn't.

    • @chanceborgese1795
      @chanceborgese1795 5 лет назад

      Don O what gas mileage do you get

    • @dono4598
      @dono4598 5 лет назад

      @@chanceborgese1795 My last fill-up I was at 22.2. I currently have 1,859 miles so break-in is complete. This is mixed use, city/freeway. I live in Southern California where we are currently enjoying $4.00 plus per gallon, we are not even using the summer blend yet in which case we will probably be at $4.50 plus for regular unleaded. I also keep my auto start stop engaged, not sure how much this helps but at $4.00 per gallon anything helps.

  • @ryanharris2415
    @ryanharris2415 3 года назад

    arent the motor features swapped now? As in the v6 has etorque now whereas the i4 no longer has it. Would love to see an update on the new versions of motors.

  • @kevinfarrell3121
    @kevinfarrell3121 10 месяцев назад

    So, just looking for honest opinions from folks that already have the 2.0
    I have a 2021 Gladiator and a 2000 Sahara. Both have 6 cylinders. I am looking at a 2018 Wrangler Unlimited to use as my daily vehicle. In my lifetime, I never would purchase a 4 cylinder as I always wanted to be sure the car can get out of it's own way. Of course, as things change, I am under the assumption that these 2.0 Liters with the turbo are much better than 4's used to be. Am I correct in that assumption? Also the one I'm looking at momentarily has around 82,000 miles on it (I can't afford a brand new one). I'm in my late 50's and am thinking whatever I buy will probably be my last "New to me" vehicle! I want to be sure i will be happy with this one while keeping my other two as well. I won't be doing a lot of playing with this one so I don't care about all the tow package and what it will do on a trail. I just need to be confident it will get me to and from work (About 10 miles each way) and an occasional 300 to 700 mile drive to visit family!
    I'm just looking for honest feedback to help me make my decision!
    Thanks !

  • @Raydawg
    @Raydawg 5 лет назад

    My question is, can that RPM being modulated by the ecu be reprogrammed out of the ecu? I want to upgrade my JKU to the new JLU, Just can't find the model I want on any freaking lots V6 manual transmission RUBICON. I want full control of my JLU, I already plan to rip the rear camera off before leaving the lot and hopefully someone will offer a kit soon to relocate the tail lights in some, I rip the license plate bracket off all the time when off road. I can only imagine how easy those lights will tear off.LOl

  • @solofade7524
    @solofade7524 4 года назад

    Looking to buy a rubicon 2.0l 2021yr. What are your thoughts? Choosing it over the 3.6l

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  4 года назад +2

      The 2.0L is a solid little engine! I have a 2018 2-Door Sport with 25,000 miles on it now and I've had 0 issues. The power delivery and driving feel is a little different compared to the 3.6L, so I recommend driving both to see which you like the feel of best. -Zach

    • @solofade7524
      @solofade7524 4 года назад

      @@extremeterrain thanks! I will drive it to see which feels better!

  • @Stormtrooper-iy5ld
    @Stormtrooper-iy5ld 6 лет назад +2

    Love the color on the 2 door

  • @TheSchmed
    @TheSchmed 4 года назад

    Let’s see 100K miles later which motor is doing better over the other. My guess, the 3.6l natural aspirated not 1/2 as “worn” as the higher revving, turbo 4 banger.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  4 года назад +2

      Actually the 2.0L has a lower redline compared to the 3.6L and its peak torque hits a lot lower compared to the V6 due to how the turbo and eTorque system is set up. The 3.6L is likes to be revved to get its all of its HP out though, so its a little apples to oranges there. Long story short, the 2.0L has shown to be pretty impressive over the last 3 model years! I have one! -Zach

  • @alexhaas4645
    @alexhaas4645 6 лет назад

    Why did you disconnect the sway bar? Isn’t that needed?
    New(to me) jeep owner ‘03 4.0 Sahara with d44 in the back.

    • @thechangstep9052
      @thechangstep9052 6 лет назад +1

      The Sahara and the Sport packages do not come with an anti-sway bar disconnect, so that's why he didn't disconnect it.

    • @WesleyOnlineNet
      @WesleyOnlineNet 6 лет назад +2

      The sway bar is to lessen body roll especially at high speeds. When rock climbing, you disconnect the sway bar to allow more articulation of the suspension.

  • @GTRJohnny66
    @GTRJohnny66 5 лет назад +1

    Great video, sounds like a toss up for a winner. What color is that 2-door? I like it, sort of a green gray.

  • @stevendavidsonrn
    @stevendavidsonrn 3 года назад

    So around 3 years later, would you still buy the 4 cylinder?

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  3 года назад +1

      I've had my 2.0L JL since early 2019 and I've been happy with it! Right around 24 mpg daily with it, plenty of horsepower and torque, the only downsides I can speak of are needing to use 91 octane fuel and paying for nicer synthetic oil when changes come around. 😂 I haven't heard of reliability issues either when looking at forums or Facebook groups! If you're in the market for a JL I'd recommend giving both engines a test drive! -Zach

  • @TheCableGuy1981
    @TheCableGuy1981 6 лет назад +3

    Many people have built V6 Jeeps on 37's & bigger.. I'd really like to see how that 2.0L 4 cylinder handles 37's.. I'd like to see how it performs before getting one built that way.

    • @robertgoins7933
      @robertgoins7933 6 лет назад +4

      Go to the JL forum. There are a few people with 2.0 engines running 37s with no issues.

    • @capt.stubing5604
      @capt.stubing5604 5 лет назад

      Most owners with 37s are going to want to go the lower gearing, probably with either engine. I just don’t see the advantage of paying so much more for gas to get a small bump in mileage, other than range.

    • @marquezo
      @marquezo 3 года назад

      @@capt.stubing5604 so which engine do you like out of the two ?

  • @GuestEngine
    @GuestEngine 6 лет назад

    Love the 2-door. Hate Jeeps standard black body on the Grey. Are you removing the fenders and replacing with what?

  • @CaseyDesmond
    @CaseyDesmond 6 лет назад +1

    Loved this, thanks!

  • @pauldonnelly6691
    @pauldonnelly6691 5 лет назад

    I just rent 2020 jeep Wrangler 2.0 l turbo and later broke down on the way home it has only 2600 miles on it the alternator fail

  • @KubanKevin
    @KubanKevin Год назад

    4 door vs 2 door even with the same engine it makes a huge difference especially when rock climbing

  • @MrSergiosa
    @MrSergiosa 4 года назад

    Please compare manual and automatic transmission with different motors model

  • @floydjohnson2046
    @floydjohnson2046 6 лет назад

    How will the 2.0 hold up to deep muddy water 30+ inches

  • @japopo5533
    @japopo5533 6 лет назад +1

    Do the same test big tires and a lift that would be interesting

  • @bryanjean4873
    @bryanjean4873 4 года назад

    Not much comparison with street tires on both, AT tires it wouldn't be any problems getting stuck

  • @BeefaloBart
    @BeefaloBart 6 лет назад +1

    Love to see this comparison once the diesel comes out, then do all 3 with same body style.

  • @Chris-Magyar
    @Chris-Magyar 6 лет назад

    Do you guys have a video on rock light instal?

  • @larrytillick952
    @larrytillick952 6 лет назад

    OK, so what is the price difference in the two engines? If the 2.0 is more than the 3.6, what is the point of the 2.0 since in reality, their performance is so close?

    • @g496r500t
      @g496r500t 5 лет назад

      Larry Tillick 2.0 is more by 3k

  • @jclrk828
    @jclrk828 6 лет назад

    Do you think the wheel base might make a difference; why not compare the same vehicle with the different engines.

  • @joeshmoe8952
    @joeshmoe8952 2 года назад

    How does the 2.0 do with 33 inch tires?

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  2 года назад +1

      It does great! Many people report throwing 35s on with little issues too because of that turbo! -Zach

  • @dieseltrucks1895
    @dieseltrucks1895 6 лет назад +1

    2 huge variables here. 1. wheelbase 2. Tires

  • @chrisecker9341
    @chrisecker9341 6 лет назад +1

    I don‘t trust this new 2.0L turbo. 2nd generation maybe. I‘m burned by the AFM issues on my GM 5.3L

  • @co4x4
    @co4x4 6 лет назад +6

    I'd like to see you put 37's on your 2 door. I'm in the process (various upgrades to stock front axle) of going to 37's on my JK 2 door (Rubicon) and it be great to see those size tires on a JL. Good luck!

    • @co4x4
      @co4x4 6 лет назад +3

      @Orion Stucky I have the 3.6 motor with an automatic and plan on running the stock 4.10 gears for about a year perhaps even longer till I save up enough $ to swap into 5.13's. Running stock 4.10's around town and even offroad on the trail isn't bad. The issue with 4.10's and 37's will be trying to keep up with my wheeling buddies on the interstate at 75mph going up into the mountains. Once there at the trail head I'll be fine :)

  • @Skiper_31
    @Skiper_31 2 месяца назад +1

    Im have jeep 2019 turbo

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  2 месяца назад +1

      The 2.0L Jeeps are really nice! I had one for 3 years and loved it! -Zach

    • @nemomilo333
      @nemomilo333 Месяц назад

      Same here, same year, same engine. 80k on the odo, no issues whatsoever (so far). Doing regular maintenance and it serves me well :)

  • @Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy
    @Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy 5 лет назад

    Tough to compare on snow where you get wheel-slip with both Jeeps. A 1.0L NA 3 cylinder would get wheel-slip too in these conditions...wheelbase differences aside. That said, just put a freaking turbo on the 3.6L and bob's your uncle! There's no replacement for displacement! ...unless there's a huge weight difference? Because lightweight could be awesome.

  • @g.fortin3228
    @g.fortin3228 2 года назад

    To me, can't have a "best" video without discussing track record for reliability. Can we add that to a future video ?

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  2 года назад +1

      2.0Ls are still running strong on the road 5 model years later! I had a 2.0L with over 50,000 miles on it up until this last August with no issues whatsoever. They're a great option and are fun on the road! -Zach

    • @g.fortin3228
      @g.fortin3228 2 года назад

      @@extremeterrain Thats cool but I'm thinking reliability at over 150k, maybe it's too early for this until some of them get up there. I honestly hope it turns out much better than Ford's ecoboost 4cyl. I'd like to know not to be afraid of a good used one with service records.

    • @TheSavage3.6
      @TheSavage3.6 11 месяцев назад

      @@g.fortin32283.6s can hit well over 600K. They last forever

  • @Yauu2
    @Yauu2 5 лет назад

    My 2.8 CRD JK (diesel), Europe, has 339 ft-lb. Not worth to make any comparison video to these JL models. So wait for the diesel in the US.

  • @carlosdanielosunafranco8581
    @carlosdanielosunafranco8581 4 года назад +1

    Orales que buena duda tenía está resuelta compraré el 2.0 turbo 4 puertas más económico en gasolina e igual de eficiente mucho mejor

  • @carwarz
    @carwarz 5 лет назад

    sweet video, keep up great work

  • @PKDesigns2011
    @PKDesigns2011 2 года назад

    I like these A Lot but I swear these are good for a rental or someone who wants to sink a ton of $$ down the drain ... Not hating just super not happy with the fact they charge so much but neglect all the basics to make this last, I mean look @ 1:49 ... I like going off road but I sure as hell don't like brining it back home with me 😒

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  2 года назад

      To be fair, any vehicle you take off-road on muddy trails will look like that. That's not a Jeep thing. 😂 -Zach

  • @garrettcampbell5995
    @garrettcampbell5995 5 лет назад

    Next time go 4door on both. Add the weight in the turbo. Then feel it take a dump. Turbo the 3 liter and see what you get. TaKe the hp up to around 380+ range and way more torque.

  • @romanz7163
    @romanz7163 2 месяца назад

    Если вы не планируете ставить большие колеса то хватит 2.0 а нсли планируете 35 и выше колеса то 3.6 + компрессор

  • @slavakuznetsov4966
    @slavakuznetsov4966 2 года назад

    You guys could get all the way up in the two-door. Easily! Stock 2.0L 2door is obviously a lot more off-road capable!

  • @chrispaul1943
    @chrispaul1943 6 лет назад +8

    Jku gang

  • @tinslatee
    @tinslatee 4 года назад

    2.0L requires 91 octane so any fuel mileage advantage is lost with premium fuel price.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  4 года назад +1

      I'm sure if you *really* want to go through and do the math, I'm sure the cost of gas vs extra MPG does even out a bit. At the end of the day though, my personal 2.0L gets 25 mpg consistently around town and on the highway. I know plenty of other 2.0L owners that are still getting around 21 mpg after adding larger tires as well. The 3.6L is an absolute work horse of a engine that's proven to be reliable, but I wouldn't knock the 2.0L by any means. -Zach

    • @jlai3861
      @jlai3861 3 года назад

      I was not aware of that premium gas requirement when picking up my JL 2.0 , at the time I didn't get to choose a engine the dealer basic went with 2.0 because it has $2000 rebate where v6 had none, if I given a chance I probably would go with v6. anyway I only feed it with 87 so far after 15000km average fuel consumption is around 10.7litter/ 100 km mixed, and it seems pretty quick when pull off from traffic light.. I'm pretty satisfied because prior of buying mine my sister's 3.6 V6 was like 13-14litter/ 100km.

  • @Ben-sv9op
    @Ben-sv9op 3 года назад

    I drove the four-cylinder turbo did not like the squeaky sound of the motor I thought the V-6 was a lot stronger and sounds better .. so v6 it was

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  3 года назад +1

      I've been driving my 2.0L daily for the last two years with no issues at all! You can't go wrong with the V6 though! -Zach

  • @diekatze9361
    @diekatze9361 5 лет назад

    Thanks so much for the Video , Looking at a JL at this time , same color as well , but with a soft top . ...

  • @jgoldman2
    @jgoldman2 5 лет назад

    Love your videos, but you never remember to mention what transfer case you have and when you are in 4H or 4L, and if you used any of the hill descent or other aids. For us noobs, it would really help if you tried to remember to mention this verbally or put an overlay on screen.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  5 лет назад +1

      Fair point! For the majority of slow and technical off-roading over rocks like you saw in the beginning of the video, 4L is always the go to. For lighter trails where you don't have to worry about picking lines and going up over obstacles, 4H is the go to. Thanks for watching! -Zach

  • @Codethe_Road
    @Codethe_Road 6 лет назад +14

    Give me a 4.0L anyday;

    • @mopar21
      @mopar21 5 лет назад +1

      Yeah, because that is a current offering.

    • @jeepercreepers54
      @jeepercreepers54 5 лет назад

      Bring back the 4.0L and build an American Jeep. No more eurotrash. And yeah, I'm almost 65 ;-)

    • @mopar21
      @mopar21 5 лет назад

      @@jeepercreepers54 they're built in Ohio. Are you against advancement in technology?

    • @MoragTong_
      @MoragTong_ 5 лет назад

      @@jeepercreepers54 Oh you mean that gutless turd engine that had a JAPANESE transmission mated to it? Why were there so many Buick V6 swaps if the 4.0 was such a stellar motor? GTFOH

    • @TheSchmed
      @TheSchmed 4 года назад

      I say bring back the 4.7L PowerTech V8 that they had in the Jeep Commander, they can probably get 350Hp & 400 fl lbs of TQ out of that nowadays.

  • @russiaKGB
    @russiaKGB 6 лет назад +2

    wait 4 diesel one

  • @jeremyzhang2504
    @jeremyzhang2504 5 лет назад +2

    Why compare engines off-road... just throw 35s on them assuming both have the same gearing and see which one can drive up a mountain better

  • @wsigona
    @wsigona 6 лет назад +1

    Mopar 2 inch lift, 285 75 17 MT tires, full skid plates, 4.10 gears and a set of steel bumpers with a Warn XD8000 winch. Done and will be a good daily driver and will do and trail you want.

  • @Jeeppeeps
    @Jeeppeeps 3 года назад +1

    While I am a 2 L turbo fan myself having one in my 2021 Willys four-door I don’t think comparing a two door to a four-door is Ever in comparison to two doors have much better numbers when it comes to off-roading.
    However I will say having driven them both myself the 2 L feels much much peppier than the pennastar

  • @nickolsen2175
    @nickolsen2175 6 лет назад +2

    Extreme terrain should host an event at rausch after this winter breaks

  • @ramblingrich3544
    @ramblingrich3544 6 лет назад

    ill Repete why
    I bought a 2 door Rubi Manual with the 3.6 ..why?......So why was the 2.0 created? was the 3.6 lacking in power? NO was it lacking in torque? NO the 2.0 was created to squeeze out a few more MPG Cost Cutting And better EPA and CARB ratings equalling Fewer Fines for FCA and Better MPG at the cost of IMHO engine longevity that's what I made my decision on ...Why was the 2.0 Created? I'm not saying it is not capable after all Ill still WAVE @ a 2.0 lol it seems you need to rev a bit more that's all ... but I wasn't sold on its Reason for Being

  • @maverick1367
    @maverick1367 5 лет назад

    The v6 why change to new engine if I already know the v6

  • @TheSchmed
    @TheSchmed 4 года назад +1

    Sahara has rear LSD that sport does not have

  • @CammieGee
    @CammieGee 5 лет назад

    What kind of mileage are you getting with your 2.0?

    • @dono4598
      @dono4598 5 лет назад +1

      I am about 18.2 on my last tank full, I have less than 500 miles on it so it should improve. I also leave the start/stop engaged so this my help... a little.

    • @CammieGee
      @CammieGee 5 лет назад

      @@dono4598 Thanks for the info

    • @Summerfan69
      @Summerfan69 5 лет назад +1

      I’m getting an average of 22.5 combine better city & freeway!

    • @CammieGee
      @CammieGee 5 лет назад

      @@Summerfan69 thanks

    • @dono4598
      @dono4598 5 лет назад

      Right there with you Dino, 22.2 on my last tank combined, I now have 1600 miles on mine so I think its starting to stretch its legs. I love getting on the freeway now, with the turbo boost its sooo much easier, almost like my 1500 Hemi...

  • @Nikait1975
    @Nikait1975 6 лет назад

    JLU V6 renovado.. I will buy the renewed V6 JLU 02-01-2019

  • @TheTraumarn
    @TheTraumarn 5 лет назад +1

    Seriously?!?! If you're going to compare vehicles, compare similar vehicles with similar specs. Any jackhole will know a smaller wheel base will perform better on any technical trail. My old stock 4-banger '90 YJ will outdo my '17 JKU on the same trail based on wheel base alone. C'mon guys, if you're going to make comparisons, make them with vehicles of the similar configuration.

  • @Shakshuka69
    @Shakshuka69 6 лет назад +6

    The V6 hands down. You might be able to make a lot more power with the 2.0 and a reflash, but the 3.6 is gonna run 4 times longer and be much cheaper and easier to find parts for.

  • @rich7447
    @rich7447 3 года назад

    Full disclosure: I went with the 2.0L hybrid because I want the cash from Biden. That being said my choice would have been the 3.6 in the current setup, but the I long for the L6.

  • @AZOVRLND
    @AZOVRLND Год назад

    Why does nobody consider the longevity of turbos. They will have to be serviced or changed out. Putting too small of an engine and turbocharging it is a bad trend in the auto industry now. They should have went with at least a the tried and true v6 3.0 and then put a turbo on it.

    • @extremeterrain
      @extremeterrain  Год назад +1

      For what its worth - I still haven't heard or seen any major issues on these 2.0Ls since they were added to Wranglers in 2018. Many of them are at or over 100k miles now. It still early for sure but I would buy another 2.0L Wrangler in a heartbeat over the 3.6L. -Zach

  • @black_widow_overland
    @black_widow_overland 6 лет назад +3

    I enjoy my 2.0 i4 turbo 🤙🏻

  • @K03sport
    @K03sport 6 лет назад

    Engine performance/behavior comparison doesn't mean much w/o shots of the tach/speedo. Body/wb differences aside, the whole point of the video was to show engine differences and all we we shown was the outside...poor execution even if the guy was giving his play by play, the video was 11 minutes of nothing.

  • @cello4ever85
    @cello4ever85 4 года назад +1

    Cooper mud terrain 😁

  • @avnmech
    @avnmech 3 года назад

    You are comparing a much lighter two-door to a much heavier four-door. They're totally different vehicles so there's really no comparison, other than the fact that they both wear a Jeep name plate and they both have the Wrangler name and they're both jl models well once a jlu that looks like a Sahara and one looks like a jl Sport two-door so they're really different. They're both different spring rates, body weight and several other things. No of you had to Sport JLs, both 2dr, or 4dr with a 2.0, and a 3.6 then we'd be able to compare. when attempting to do a comparison on anything you should only have one variable if you're indeed only testing one variable but if you're testing multiple variables then you have a test that would be extremely difficult to do because the more variables you do the lack of control you have on the test this is taught and basic high school science.

  • @wesliggett2454
    @wesliggett2454 3 года назад

    If my jku breaks. I’ll get another jku. The jls are just not appealing to me at all. I don’t need a 35k computer.

  • @titolynch
    @titolynch 6 лет назад +2

    How many times can a man say “little” in one video.
    Great video by the way. I would still choose the 3.6L

  • @717UT
    @717UT 5 лет назад

    I'd be on board if it was a 2L turbo DIESEL. I hate that this country hates diesel motors...

  • @faeriefire6
    @faeriefire6 6 лет назад

    how do I get my jeep modded through make a wish with you guys?

  • @mrmackee123
    @mrmackee123 6 лет назад +1

    Same chassis would have made this review perfect.😪

  • @HondaAholic
    @HondaAholic Год назад

    In what world does it make sense to try and compare motors when the vehicle body isn't even the same?

  • @Bob_Jones123
    @Bob_Jones123 4 года назад

    All the people complaining about the 2-door/4-door difference are correct but need to realize, most of these youtube channels have ZERO budget. They had to beg, borrow and steal just to do this video. Nobody likely got paid to produce it. Everyone is working for copy/credit. Trust me, I used to work in the shitty video production industry.