Ford 302 Cylinder Wall Thickness, Stock 5.0 HO SBF

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
  • In this video I measure the cylinder wall thickness on a stock 302

Комментарии • 20

  • @BigStickStangs
    @BigStickStangs 8 месяцев назад +1

    Man sux that happened. That measurement is what I normally see people get on those castings. Amazing that they hold up so well. All good until a valve drops into the piston. Thanks for sharing this with us!
    👊😎✌️

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад

      Thank you for your support Rick! Its crazy that the walls are so thin!!! And Im thinking they get even thinner after each rebuild 😳…

  • @SleazysGarage
    @SleazysGarage 8 месяцев назад +1

    Crazy damage but it's always great to turn things like that into a learning opportunity. Thanks for sharing!

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад

      Thanks for your support brother! I was hoping to get at least a good block out of this… but no sir, it all went to hell

  • @ogsuperflygarage
    @ogsuperflygarage 8 месяцев назад +2

    This is great video Luis! I still can't get over the catastrophic damage! WOW! But you were able to find out some good information because it. Be sure and give it a good send off! 😅🤟🏾👊🏾

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад +1

      Im still in disbelief too, but also kinda glad it’s all over now and I can move on to working on something else. Yeah! I was thinking of people who punch these out .040 or even .060 over for a rebuild how thin the casting actually gets!!! 😬😬😳

  • @89G
    @89G 8 месяцев назад +1

    That is roughly a smidge under 5mm then. That's a lot thinner than I expected!! Nice info.

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад +1

      I was thinking that as well! Also about how much thinner they get after being bored out a couple of times 😬

    • @89G
      @89G 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@MrBlitzkrieg1987 that's a great point!! If my math is correct, going 40 over would be roughly 1mm larger, meaning you'd be shaving .5mm frm that wall.

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад +1

      @@89G I honestly wish I had not seen that, holding that thin wall of powdery metal in my hand made me lose confidence in building anything serious with a stock block ☠️🙁

    • @89G
      @89G 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@MrBlitzkrieg1987 at least that wasn't on the thrust side, and that's where it needs the most strength.

  • @imtheonevanhalen1557
    @imtheonevanhalen1557 8 месяцев назад +1

    One of the biggest mistakes I ever made was using block fill in a Cleveland because of all the yadda about core shift in the casting process....the forged TRW pistons would slap when it was cold, so I filled the block......constant over heat at the end of the eighth!

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад

      I’ve never used block fill, none of my builds have ever gotten that serious. But I’ve heard it from at least one other person that confirms what you are saying!

  • @marvingmarving4405
    @marvingmarving4405 8 месяцев назад +1

    Hell yeah brother.

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you for watching 😎🤟… I really appreciate the comment 🫡

  • @alltherpm
    @alltherpm 8 месяцев назад +1

    Triple x is mustang that might b grand marquis

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад

      I’ve actually seen both Y and X on Mustangs… my brothers hatch had a Y block as well and Im almost 💯 sure its factory. Unless someone swapped it in too 😂🤣

    • @alltherpm
      @alltherpm 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@MrBlitzkrieg1987 I've rebuilt atleast a dozen 5.0 mustangs. All xxx, but there all the same anyways

    • @MrBlitzkrieg1987
      @MrBlitzkrieg1987  8 месяцев назад

      @@alltherpm yeah, I believe you! The SN95 302 that I put on the T-top was an XXX, Im not really sure that these yyy blocks were original to the cars, maybe someone swapped them in at some point.