Don't have the time to watch right now but will keep the tab open. I can't imagine a society like this be anything else than absolute hell. You would constantly have to correct for all the differences between humans, and the ambitious people would really get punished in all of this.
Having basic needs met such, as complete nutrition, safe water adequate shelter adequate clothing, full education the means to contribute to others and peace is all that is required in terms of equality, since if these conditions were met for all people to the best of human abilities then the ills of human inequality would be reversed enough to easily be endured. Economic growth is a psychotic pursuit called greed and the pursuers of it have us convinced that it is as necessary as water when all that needs to happen is cooperation ,providence and caring for one another.
Many ancient stone age cultures have us so beat we don't even know that we're asking the wrong questions and holding the wrong premises across the board
This is a ridiculous question because people are not all equal and never will be as we differ greatly in mental and physical abilities. Also, it's not possible to create a system where we somehow make everyone magically equal (i.e. create equal outcomes). Now, we can certainly try to make sure nobody is without basic necessities but that's not equality - in fact, it's recognizing that we're not all equal and thus some require society to provide some basic level of care to those not able to do so for themselves.
No one advocates for complete equality. Everyone advocates for equality in certain areas. The vast majority of people don't care if everyone gets equal amounts of Snickers candy. The vast majority of people do care if people have reasonable opportunities to freely choose how they work with others.
Yeah, look how well it went in all those communist societies! Also, why should you impose equality on everybody? Different people have different skills, make different choices, etc.
@@harambe2552your goal then would be to be worthy of respect for your true effort and action for the best of our world and our planet. Now it’s not about what you Offer but you have on your “possession” money, houses, cars…
The Marxist countries lacked democracy so it led to dictatorship. Also it is true that some people are not as good as others but they would be able to achieve
Don't have the time to watch right now but will keep the tab open. I can't imagine a society like this be anything else than absolute hell. You would constantly have to correct for all the differences between humans, and the ambitious people would really get punished in all of this.
Having basic needs met such, as complete nutrition, safe water adequate shelter adequate clothing, full education the means to contribute to others and peace is all that is required in terms of equality, since if these conditions were met for all people to the best of human abilities then the ills of human inequality would be reversed enough to easily be endured. Economic growth is a psychotic pursuit called greed and the pursuers of it have us convinced that it is as necessary as water when all that needs to happen is cooperation ,providence and caring for one another.
Many ancient stone age cultures have us so beat we don't even know that we're asking the wrong questions and holding the wrong premises across the board
achedemic achievement is it's own reward if you disagree just look up the pay and conditions!
This is a ridiculous question because people are not all equal and never will be as we differ greatly in mental and physical abilities. Also, it's not possible to create a system where we somehow make everyone magically equal (i.e. create equal outcomes). Now, we can certainly try to make sure nobody is without basic necessities but that's not equality - in fact, it's recognizing that we're not all equal and thus some require society to provide some basic level of care to those not able to do so for themselves.
This is like asking what it would be like if we lived forever. It's not going to happen. It's an absurd question.
Sounds like a dystopia.
Kinda but we need changes for sure.. the world system is corrupted
@@Shon.haris. True dat. But not from one extreme to the other. Enforcing equality must inevitably lead to the loss of individual freedom.
People could be proud of their hard work as a worker and would focus on social stuff
No one advocates for complete equality. Everyone advocates for equality in certain areas. The vast majority of people don't care if everyone gets equal amounts of Snickers candy. The vast majority of people do care if people have reasonable opportunities to freely choose how they work with others.
Scientists did this sort of experiment with rats where they had enough of everything and let's just say it didn't end well...
Yeah, look how well it went in all those communist societies!
Also, why should you impose equality on everybody? Different people have different skills, make different choices, etc.
Well I think it has to do more with the money and the rights law etc…
@@Shon.haris. if we all have the same amount of money, why would any of us work anymore?
@@harambe2552your goal then would be to be worthy of respect for your true effort and action for the best of our world and our planet.
Now it’s not about what you
Offer but you have on your “possession” money, houses, cars…
@@harambe2552 I don't work to earn more money than others. I work to earn money.
The Marxist countries lacked democracy so it led to dictatorship.
Also it is true that some people are not as good as others but they would be able to achieve
It would be very boring.
Socialism is egalitarian
You have the worst taste for bgm