Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Toyota Corolla Cross 2022

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2022
  • Euro NCAP performs a series of crash and safety tests on car models:
    - a frontal impact test, 50% of the width of the car is striking an oncoming deformable barrier, also travelling at 50 km/h
    - a frontal impact test, the car impacts a rigid full width barrier
    - a side impact test, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door
    - a pole test, the tested car is propelled sideways
    - a far-side impact test, the robustness of the centre airbag is evaluated by two dummies in the front.
    A series of pedestrian tests are conducted with different impactors, adult and child head form, lower and upper leg form and whiplash tests are performed on a sled as well as AEB pedestrian and cyclist tests.
    Active safety is tested based on the car’s equipment: autonomous emergency braking car-to-car scenarios, occupant status monitoring (including seatbelt reminders), lane support and speed assistance technologies.
    All details on the Euro NCAP Website:
    Toyota Corolla Cross 2022 test information www.euroncap.com/en/results/t...
    Euro NCAP November 2022 Press release www.euroncap.com/en/press-med...
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 70

  • @JackMaslovCZLive
    @JackMaslovCZLive Год назад +49

    I believe NCAP should up their AEB for padestrians and Safety assists tests. They should perform additional tests with people running out in the street at more complex situations such as at slight hills, turns and busier roads to see if the car doesn't start ignoring the mannequins/people when there are many things going on.
    That should be the next step to test a higher range of situations that are also more likely to occur.

    • @NamNaz
      @NamNaz Год назад +2

      Should, should, should. Ok, you should study and do it your way.

    • @cityplanner3063
      @cityplanner3063 Год назад

      They should really change there rating system. Stars have always been associated with crash worthiness but now it’s way more than that. They should do something similar to the IIHS

    • @jay-uo2bi
      @jay-uo2bi Год назад +2

      @@cityplanner3063 It's a safety rating not a crash rating. It's more than reasonable to include all aspects of safety in the rating.

    • @tumo07
      @tumo07 Год назад

      Also situations that involve motobike should be more complex

  • @Thane1607
    @Thane1607 Год назад +17

    NCAP should raise the hight of the crash barriers to align with the increase of higher riding vehicles (SUVs, crossovers and large Utes

    • @hiltonavis3795
      @hiltonavis3795 Год назад

      The height if the crash barrier is designed to represent the hight of real world things like a barrier

  • @sehysamil6693
    @sehysamil6693 8 месяцев назад +2

    It really looks amazing. All cars should have min theese feature as standards before allowing onto the roads.

  • @CommunistBest1
    @CommunistBest1 Год назад +2

    This eu spec well built

  • @muratbalaban9207
    @muratbalaban9207 8 месяцев назад

    Good

  • @eryzzyx5152
    @eryzzyx5152 7 месяцев назад +2

    я считаю что euro ncap подсуживают результаты тестов.. к примеру: Volvo xc40 recharge набрала в тесте безопасности помощи водителю 89%, хотя если вы посмотрите видео, то она даже не реагирует на маникен ребенка, просто тупо его збивая... при этом всё на это закрывают галаза и ставят 89%. В этом же автомобиле системе безопасности помощи водителю ставят оценку в 82% хотя система срабатывает идеально и тормозит раньше чем Volvo в том обзоре... Ну как-то так

  • @canokten777
    @canokten777 Год назад +19

    auto experts started talking in the comments ehehe

  • @RaviKumar-bu2mf
    @RaviKumar-bu2mf Год назад +1

    When it's going to come in India...

  • @zyke612
    @zyke612 Год назад +1

    which is worse, a moderate overlap crash test into a fixed barrier at 40mph, or two vehicles hitting offset going 35 like in this video?

    • @spaghetti9067
      @spaghetti9067 Год назад

      The two into each other at 35 bc it gives a higher combined impact force

    • @zyke612
      @zyke612 Год назад

      @@spaghetti9067 it was said in a dateline interview with IIHS that a regular moderate overlap crash simulates two cars within 500 pounds weight difference hitting eachother both going around 38 miles an hour.

    • @markmd9
      @markmd9 Год назад

      It depends on the weight of the second vehicle.
      If it is the same weight or lower then it will be a easier crash.
      It it is considerable heavier then it will be a more severe crash.

  • @canonest
    @canonest 7 месяцев назад +1

    how come this suv didn't get 95 on all tests?

  • @mso8190
    @mso8190 Год назад +9

    Where is this vehicle manufactured?

    • @KuchingKingVideoGamer
      @KuchingKingVideoGamer Год назад +11

      Japan..Thai version is meant for Asian countries

    • @unariver5810
      @unariver5810 Год назад +1

      In USA as well

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 Год назад

      This is made in Alabama United States then exported from Port of mobile for Europe the same Factory where it is produce also makes Mazda CX-50

    • @Norwegianization
      @Norwegianization Год назад

      @@EpicThe112 for europe you say

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 Год назад

      @Norwegianization correct and it's also the same for the United States Market Alabama

  • @feins
    @feins Год назад +1

    Seems much better than the ASEAN version.

    • @ThaiWolf123
      @ThaiWolf123 11 месяцев назад +1

      In Asia they have the Premium Safety model as an option. Same, same.

  • @kleberborges2141
    @kleberborges2141 Год назад +3

    Bom dia a todos pelo mundo.
    Meu comentário tardio: SE FIZEREM ESTE TESTE COM O QUÊ É FABRICADO NO BRASIL, O PEDAL DO FREIO DE ESTACIONAMENTO ENTRA PELA PERNA DO DUMMY
    ( O NOSSO E BEM TOSCO NE TOYOTA? )

    • @edrumsense
      @edrumsense Год назад +3

      Well, a friend survived a 2 big truck sandwich in a brazilian model, his family only suffered minor injuries

    • @kleberborges2141
      @kleberborges2141 Год назад

      @@edrumsense Good morning Edrum.
      Friend, see if you agree: (And a tremendous lack of respect for Brazilian consumers) Selling here the same car that sells abroad. With so many differences in technologies and finishing. PEDAL PARKING BRAKE. And well FLINSTONS!!!
      Por gentileza...responda em ( PORTUGUÊS ) Thank you, please!

  • @LeoMkII
    @LeoMkII 7 месяцев назад +1

    Man why do all Toyotas fail the side pole so bad??

  • @VanTruNgo-xx7xy
    @VanTruNgo-xx7xy Месяц назад

    😊🎉

  • @ElsaandRoloYT
    @ElsaandRoloYT Год назад +9

    This Car Could Beat Teslas

  • @ramadhanisme7
    @ramadhanisme7 Год назад

    Well at least the new innova should be much better in terms of safety since it was based on this car

  • @VanTruNgo-xx7xy
    @VanTruNgo-xx7xy Месяц назад

    1.8G one is white and one is black

  • @petergazarek9466
    @petergazarek9466 Год назад

    🤔👍🏻

  • @VanTruNgo-xx7xy
    @VanTruNgo-xx7xy Месяц назад

    new delivery car toyota cross in showroom

  • @sadiqgiyasuddin6600
    @sadiqgiyasuddin6600 4 месяца назад

    So which crash would you die from?

  • @yuzihao8777
    @yuzihao8777 3 месяца назад

    How the fuck it got "good " in side impact😊

  • @user-jv5ni5ho8z
    @user-jv5ni5ho8z Год назад

    Так собі недуже безпечно

  • @user-jv5ni5ho8z
    @user-jv5ni5ho8z Год назад

    Недуже

  • @aranglahooti6302
    @aranglahooti6302 10 месяцев назад +2

    Not as good that Toyota must be 😮

  • @VanTruNgo-xx7xy
    @VanTruNgo-xx7xy Месяц назад

    i'm like toyota corolla cross

  • @boboutelama5748
    @boboutelama5748 Год назад +3

    Nowadays, everything is "cross".
    The NCAP really needs to add "energy+fuel consumption" into the official death count per vehicle.

    • @itsAlphaFox
      @itsAlphaFox Год назад +3

      What does fuel consumption have to do with deaths lol? Also apparently someone managed to hypermile 3.3L/100km

    • @boboutelama5748
      @boboutelama5748 Год назад +1

      @@itsAlphaFox It's directly linked with the annual death toll of pollution. Car pollution also has a death toll.
      "Harvard Chan School’s Department of Environmental Health. The study was published online December 13, 2021 in the journal PNAS.
      /.../
      The researchers also estimated that deaths attributable to air pollution due to vehicle emissions dropped from 27,700 in 2008 to 19,800 in 2017. The decrease in deaths was not as large as researchers expected, because many factors offset the progress in reducing emissions, such as a larger and aging population, larger vehicles replacing smaller ones, and more miles traveled per vehicle. On the other hand, the authors noted, if vehicles were still emitting at 2008 levels, those emissions would have caused 48,200 deaths attributable to air pollution.
      (I precise, this study is just about the USA car emission deaths)

    • @itsAlphaFox
      @itsAlphaFox Год назад

      @@boboutelama5748 Energy/fuel consumption, while usually related to emissions, is not the most reliable and consistent data for that. There are other aspects that can lower emissions or increase consumption, without changing the other. It's best to measure the carbon emissions directly

    • @MegaKhaled1986
      @MegaKhaled1986 6 месяцев назад

      Really 😂😂😂😂 , any thing related to people must be under measurement and control, others like ( nuclear, weapons industries, bombs,etc) are out of coverage area ,,

    • @boboutelama5748
      @boboutelama5748 6 месяцев назад

      @@MegaKhaled1986 😅😅🤣😂😄.
      You are under the impression something is funny there. There are peoples dying right now from pollution that isn't necessary in the slightest and isn't aknowledged in any way when a car is bought. It should be very logical that peoples polluting more should help peoples that didn't asked for it and became sick the the extention of the user's behavior.
      We perfectly do it for guns, for oil spills and for common accidents, but we, strangely, always miss to catch the ball when it comes to pollution emmissions.

  • @gigieinaudi24
    @gigieinaudi24 Год назад

    not an outstanding score for a brand new car

  • @yusuf-sx5xh
    @yusuf-sx5xh Год назад +2

    just disappointment

    • @jacobcubero6915
      @jacobcubero6915 Год назад +4

      why?

    • @unariver5810
      @unariver5810 Год назад +4

      Why? This is a great vehicle...

    • @user-sm7tj8kb7k
      @user-sm7tj8kb7k Год назад

      understood. you are so dissapointed over your own feeling that toyota is a suck car...

  • @paulogomes8762
    @paulogomes8762 Год назад +10

    TESLA is totaly better !!!

    • @vxllfire
      @vxllfire Год назад +34

      Tesla fanboy running out in the wild.

    • @user-sm7tj8kb7k
      @user-sm7tj8kb7k Год назад +1

      in term of selling price.... better for rich guy

    • @paulogomes8762
      @paulogomes8762 Год назад +2

      @@vxllfire fanboy of the better cars for safety!!! And technology, and efficiently, and performance... What's else???

    • @vxllfire
      @vxllfire Год назад +10

      @@paulogomes8762 fanboy of poor build quality and overrated car.

    • @fyk2707
      @fyk2707 Год назад +1

      bruh, Tesla is way more expensive than a Corolla Cross why are you comparing it? it's not even in the same class

  • @markmd9
    @markmd9 Год назад +4

    Chinese cars performed better 😢