Thank you to the woman who spoke so thoroughly about this topic. She was extremely well versed yet so understated, so comfortable with the topic. BRAVO! Very impressive. Loved it!
Interesting that blue is such a rare / hard to make color. In LEDs, it took decades until we finally were able to produce blue lights (bright enough for electronics / screens that is). Red and green LEDs had been around for 30 years or so, before blue ones could be made.
The Story of Ultramarine from the Silk Road to Renoir: The Chemistry of Colour | National Gallery 1114am 24.4.24 some copper and vinegar.... you'll need a decent vat of vinegar and some copper piping. place the copper in vat and let the vinegar create a turquoise-coloured solution. if you do let me know if it works.....
It's so amazing how beautiful that blue still is after 600+ years. How much I would love to see Renoir's Umbrellas, the internet only has small, not-so-great photographs of it, it must be stunning in person. From the small glimpse of it in this video, it almost looks like he used similar brushstrokes as Cezanne's in the dress of the main woman on the left. In photos I have seen over the years, I've always wondered why the characters on the right had markedly different blue tones than the rest of the characters, and now thanks to this video, I finally understand. Thank you!
Thanks for watching, Liesl! You can also have a zoom into 'The Umbrellas' on our website here: www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/pierre-auguste-renoir-the-umbrellas
Lapis was also widely used across ancient Egypt as well as Persia, and Egyptians were also known to use its pigment as makeup! While this oil paint version was critical to European art, it is no wonder it's still so vibrant after 600 years - since we have Egyptian art that is thousands of years old and still vibrantly blue.
The fact that this color was used to paint the entire exterior of a church, Voronet monastery, in Bucovina, Romania, that is known as the "Sistine chapel of the East" is a testament of the richness of Moldova region in the past.
Also... - If its ground in oil, it oxidises and has to be stored in a glass bottle under a layer of oil rather than in a tube where it will harden quickly. - Suspended in oil, it acts like wet sand on a beach in that if its interacted with, it will become dry looking. Left alone, it returns to a wet luminous look. Smalt does this as well. Like smalt, this pigment resists oil suspension accounting for the drying in a tube. If you buy it as a tubed paint, ($200-$300) transfer it to a glass jar with a centimetre of walnut oil on top. - Traditionally, it was glazed over a lighter pigment like lead white but optimally, it works best over a dried Azure blue or any turquoise+ white near a Munsell 6-7 value. (Egyptians used both blues/ BC) - It has a low tinting power and is very delicate, at least 3 layers of glaze must be done to get the full effect. At one or two, you will wonder what the fuss is about . At three or four, you will be speechless. - It will dry dull. If its glazed in layers it will still be somewhat dull. When varnished however, you will weep . - If you add lead white to it, and use it in backgrounds, all the landscapes youve seen in museums painted before 1800 will make sense to you.
Yes always thought there's nothing special about modern synthetic ultramarine colour especially acrylic, which I usually use when working with purple shades & seldom for its own sake. Think also that it's got so many connotations with past western art that it's hard to avoid cliché if used heavily in visuals. Thanks for the glazing analysis, which ironically the impressionists didn't do much of in general as they probably saw it as a passe technique. This video got me wanting to try the real thing but I'll need to sell something to afford a bit...
An extraordinary history behind one of the most stunningly beautiful color pigment ever produced and used by the world's greatest artists explained in such great detail by The National Gallery!!😍😍❤❤
One of the fun details that wasn’t really mentioned in this really great video is that there are a lot of cases where the pigment is used on Mary’s clothes to distinguish her.
Natural ultramarine endows the works employing it with an added allure, in so amazingly linking such disparate places and cultures across such vast geographical spaces. The hue also seems more vivid, literally richer, than the synthetic ultramarine examples, based on the survey illustrated here.
Renoir painted two distinct styles in the Umbrella's picture, more impressionist on the right side. He also made a mistake and painted seven feet rather than six of the woman and two girls on the right. Thanks to NG for another interesting video.
That was a fascinating explanation of the history of the blue color in paintings. The blue of lapis lazuli has always been a favorite of mine and also I am fascinated by the same blue in birds. My car is even partially the same color blue because it speaks to me on such an organic level.
The thing with the mineral colours, is that they take a LOT of care and knowledge to make pigments from them. Some luckily are like ochres, which can just be crushed. Some tho like ultramarine are more finicky. Crush ultramarine too far, and rather than intensifying the colour, it actually lessens. There’s an optimum particle size which colourmen learned by trial and error…..given the pigment cost, as little error as possible.
Thank you! That was a very informative story. I appreciate it as I am new to watercolor painting and I wondered about the French Ultramarine and ultramarine.
If you look at the Van Gogh paintings they are full of yellows, greens and earth coloured ochre's. Within his age of life, blue was very expensive, so you know he chose his colours to suit his pocket. It was only later in his life, he could afford blue, and sadly, only for a short time. Back in the day, blue could only be extracted via a stinking process of sea shell animals. Lapis Laseri was beyond most artists purse. Even synthetic blue was expensive, unless you had a rich patron.
Very interesting! I know some things about usage of blu d'oltremare in medieval paintings and frescos (see the ceiling of Cappella degli Scrovegni by Giotto, for example) but I didn't know anything about that pigment in modern art. Thank you indeed!
Are there any great resources on the science & history of such pigments? Edit: I mainly use color pencils, but even there the pigments matter. There's a carmine made from beetle shells, there used to be a brown made from ground-up mummies, etc. Indigo used to be associated with wealth & the slave trade. Titanium oxides are used for white, etc. Some pigments are loaded with toxic materials. It's fascinating all around.
I’ve wondered how lapis lazuli was turned into pigment. Very interesting- it’s so vivid! In “Umbrellas”, the woman on the left is quite striking, isn’t she!
Thank you so much for such a brilliant film. Forgive my question but was the earlier blue (lapis) used in Persian miniature paintings. It is noticeable in the Safavid and earlier era. At one time the capital was Herat which is now in western Afghanistan.
I’ve always wondered how the lapis lazuli was processed to get such a strong blue pigment as ultramarine, given the frequent impurities in the stone. Also, I never knew of the origins of the term “French Ultramarine.” Today painters often say that the difference between the French Ultramarine and Ultramarine paints has to do with the warmth of the hue; that is, one version is more reddish and the other is a bit cooler and perhaps less deep. I wonder if those are secondary characteristics from when synthetic ultramarine was invented, and thus are historical correlation rather than “French.” Certainly there are variations from brand to brand, and brand names for paint have sometimes been more about romantic marketing than scientific realities. Anyway, sorry to go on, but I hope a focus on pigments’ history will continue in NG videos. Thank you, and very well done!
It's interesting that today the more pure "synthetic" ultramarine pigment is mid-tier cost-wise with pthalocyanine being its even cheaper and more commonly used substitute and cobalt as the modern high dollar blue pigment.
When watching, you have to remember that a camera, even a good one, struggles to render colours properly. Natural ultramarine is even richer and more vibrant in person.
At least real top quality natural ultramarine is still made, usually for conservation and icon making. Still incredibly expensive, though! I'll stick with my beloved French Ultramarine 😄
The Church had the monopoly on blue for use as the color associated with the Vigin Mary. The Northern Renaissance painters used red as their coror for the Virgin Mary.
Ultramarine blue now is not at all like it was in history. It is a hue now, not a pigment. Infact, the blue now is an icy blue, not with any warm tints. It is not versatile as pthalo blue is. It’s only asset is that is good in mixing with other colors.
Close to Faizabad, capital of Badakshan in N/E Afghanistan. Visited commander controlling the mines in 1990 - a powerful. jocular figure. More than likely ousted by Taliban.
Thank you to the woman who spoke so thoroughly about this topic. She was extremely well versed yet so understated, so comfortable with the topic. BRAVO! Very impressive. Loved it!
Thanks so much! We'll pass that on :)
Interesting that blue is such a rare / hard to make color. In LEDs, it took decades until we finally were able to produce blue lights (bright enough for electronics / screens that is). Red and green LEDs had been around for 30 years or so, before blue ones could be made.
The Story of Ultramarine from the Silk Road to Renoir: The Chemistry of Colour | National Gallery 1114am 24.4.24 some copper and vinegar.... you'll need a decent vat of vinegar and some copper piping. place the copper in vat and let the vinegar create a turquoise-coloured solution. if you do let me know if it works.....
It's so amazing how beautiful that blue still is after 600+ years. How much I would love to see Renoir's Umbrellas, the internet only has small, not-so-great photographs of it, it must be stunning in person. From the small glimpse of it in this video, it almost looks like he used similar brushstrokes as Cezanne's in the dress of the main woman on the left. In photos I have seen over the years, I've always wondered why the characters on the right had markedly different blue tones than the rest of the characters, and now thanks to this video, I finally understand. Thank you!
Thanks for watching, Liesl! You can also have a zoom into 'The Umbrellas' on our website here: www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/pierre-auguste-renoir-the-umbrellas
@@nationalgallery That was a treat! Thank you for providing the link.
Lapis was also widely used across ancient Egypt as well as Persia, and Egyptians were also known to use its pigment as makeup! While this oil paint version was critical to European art, it is no wonder it's still so vibrant after 600 years - since we have Egyptian art that is thousands of years old and still vibrantly blue.
That blue is stunningly intense and beautiful. A fascinating history of a pigment. Thank you
Thanks for watching!
Fantastic short art history and science lesson!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Jesus! Natural ultramarine looks crazy beautiful through TV. I can only imagine what's like seeing it personally.
The fact that this color was used to paint the entire exterior of a church, Voronet monastery, in Bucovina, Romania, that is known as the "Sistine chapel of the East" is a testament of the richness of Moldova region in the past.
Also...
- If its ground in oil, it oxidises and has to be stored in a glass bottle under a layer of oil rather than in a tube where it will harden quickly.
- Suspended in oil, it acts like wet sand on a beach in that if its interacted with, it will become dry looking. Left alone, it returns to a wet luminous look. Smalt does this as well. Like smalt, this pigment resists oil suspension accounting for the drying in a tube. If you buy it as a tubed paint, ($200-$300) transfer it to a glass jar with a centimetre of walnut oil on top.
- Traditionally, it was glazed over a lighter pigment like lead white but optimally, it works best over a dried Azure blue or any turquoise+ white near a Munsell 6-7 value. (Egyptians used both blues/ BC)
- It has a low tinting power and is very delicate, at least 3 layers of glaze must be done to get the full effect. At one or two, you will wonder what the fuss is about . At three or four, you will be speechless.
- It will dry dull. If its glazed in layers it will still be somewhat dull. When varnished however, you will weep .
- If you add lead white to it, and use it in backgrounds, all the landscapes youve seen in museums painted before 1800 will make sense to you.
Yes always thought there's nothing special about modern synthetic ultramarine colour especially acrylic, which I usually use when working with purple shades & seldom for its own sake.
Think also that it's got so many connotations with past western art that it's hard to avoid cliché if used heavily in visuals.
Thanks for the glazing analysis, which ironically the impressionists didn't do much of in general as they probably saw it as a passe technique.
This video got me wanting to try the real thing but I'll need to sell something to afford a bit...
Glad you explained how lapis lazuli was processed to make a usable paint.
Seeing the lapis blue in paintings in the uffizi is beyond description
I have seen at least half of your color and pigment videos! Going back for more this Sunday evening in San Francisco.
Enjoy watching!
An extraordinary history behind one of the most stunningly beautiful color pigment ever produced and used by the world's greatest artists explained in such great detail by The National Gallery!!😍😍❤❤
Thinking about all the lives that were consumed in these mines.... and still are. Thank you for sharing with us the journey of ultramarine.
Thank you, this was excellent! Will you do other pigments? It's a facsinating topic.
Thanks for watching. Have a look here for more videos on pigments, with more to come soon! ruclips.net/p/PLvb2y26xK6Y4V3T1xHphum23El4b93YzC
One of the fun details that wasn’t really mentioned in this really great video is that there are a lot of cases where the pigment is used on Mary’s clothes to distinguish her.
Blue and gold still looks rich and beutiful.
I loved this video, thank you. I always wondered where that intense blue color came from and I always look for it when I visit a gallery or museum
Thanks for watching!
Natural ultramarine endows the works employing it with an added allure, in so amazingly linking such disparate places and cultures across such vast geographical spaces. The hue also seems more vivid, literally richer, than the synthetic ultramarine examples, based on the survey illustrated here.
Wonderful short art history lesson with great detail
🌺🌹
Very educational; well done.
Thanks.
definitely one of my favourite colours, thanks for this 💙
You’re welcome 😊
James Fox's A history of art in three colours is a fascinating series which covers the history of blue pigment. It's available on RUclips.
Renoir painted two distinct styles in the Umbrella's picture, more impressionist on the right side. He also made a mistake and painted seven feet rather than six of the woman and two girls on the right.
Thanks to NG for another interesting video.
I remember laundry blueing. It was very blue! A very interesting talk. Thank you.
Very interesting video! I've never seen the Wilton Dyptich, it looks beautiful. Hopefully I can see it in real one day at the NG.
Aw we hope you get to pay us a visit too!
Amazing detail and science storytelling. Thank you!
That was a fascinating explanation of the history of the blue color in paintings. The blue of lapis lazuli has always been a favorite of mine and also I am fascinated by the same blue in birds. My car is even partially the same color blue because it speaks to me on such an organic level.
The thing with the mineral colours, is that they take a LOT of care and knowledge to make pigments from them. Some luckily are like ochres, which can just be crushed. Some tho like ultramarine are more finicky. Crush ultramarine too far, and rather than intensifying the colour, it actually lessens. There’s an optimum particle size which colourmen learned by trial and error…..given the pigment cost, as little error as possible.
Thank you! That was a very informative story. I appreciate it as I am new to watercolor painting and I wondered about the French Ultramarine and ultramarine.
If you look at the Van Gogh paintings they are full of yellows, greens and earth coloured ochre's. Within his age of life, blue was very expensive, so you know he chose his colours to suit his pocket. It was only later in his life, he could afford blue, and sadly, only for a short time. Back in the day, blue could only be extracted via a stinking process of sea shell animals. Lapis Laseri was beyond most artists purse. Even synthetic blue was expensive, unless you had a rich patron.
Thank you this was a a fascinating Presentation. Thoroughly enjoyed it & subscribed
Welcome, Jack!
Fascinating. Thank you!
Very interesting! I know some things about usage of blu d'oltremare in medieval paintings and frescos (see the ceiling of Cappella degli Scrovegni by Giotto, for example) but I didn't know anything about that pigment in modern art. Thank you indeed!
Are there any great resources on the science & history of such pigments?
Edit: I mainly use color pencils, but even there the pigments matter. There's a carmine made from beetle shells, there used to be a brown made from ground-up mummies, etc. Indigo used to be associated with wealth & the slave trade. Titanium oxides are used for white, etc. Some pigments are loaded with toxic materials. It's fascinating all around.
Wonderful, thank you for sharing this
In Renoir’s umbrella painting, the darker woman in natural ultramarine looks placed in the golden section for effect or focus. Just my impression.
I’ve wondered how lapis lazuli was turned into pigment. Very interesting- it’s so vivid! In “Umbrellas”, the woman on the left is quite striking, isn’t she!
There is a paint maker called "dirty blue" wich as a video showing the ancient process. You should appreciate it.
Beautifully captured! Thanks for watching.
Excellent explanation. I do miss not being able to visit "The Umbrellas" in the Hugh Lane Gallery in Dublin.
Fascinating, thank you so much!❤
Gorgeous.
So insightful. Inspirational. Thank you🇿🇦
Excellent presentation
she has endearing qualities - I like her
Excellent Well explained Enjoyed God bless
Fascinating history 👍
A very interesting video!
Blue is my favourite colour! I love all things blue, blue, blue.
Thank you so much for such a brilliant film.
Forgive my question but was the earlier blue (lapis) used in Persian miniature paintings. It is noticeable in the Safavid and earlier era. At one time the capital was Herat which is now in western Afghanistan.
so interesting thank you
I would love to go to London and see it for myself
Such a good narrator! I Really enjoyed it
Nice video. Thanks you.
I learned a lot, thanks 😊
Great video
Ultramarine is among my favourite colours. My utmost favourite is Yves Klein Blue.
That was cool! Thank you for sharing!
💙 Ultra Capsule Lesson 💙 Nice
excellent...thanks so much
Thanks for watching!
thanks!
Interesting, thanks!
Our pleasure!
Thankyou
I’ve always wondered how the lapis lazuli was processed to get such a strong blue pigment as ultramarine, given the frequent impurities in the stone. Also, I never knew of the origins of the term “French Ultramarine.” Today painters often say that the difference between the French Ultramarine and Ultramarine paints has to do with the warmth of the hue; that is, one version is more reddish and the other is a bit cooler and perhaps less deep. I wonder if those are secondary characteristics from when synthetic ultramarine was invented, and thus are historical correlation rather than “French.” Certainly there are variations from brand to brand, and brand names for paint have sometimes been more about romantic marketing than scientific realities. Anyway, sorry to go on, but I hope a focus on pigments’ history will continue in NG videos. Thank you, and very well done!
Superb
As an oil painter- I use both, with the gemstone version as a glaze.
Now I'm getting the blues.
It's interesting that today the more pure "synthetic" ultramarine pigment is mid-tier cost-wise with pthalocyanine being its even cheaper and more commonly used substitute and cobalt as the modern high dollar blue pigment.
❤JOANNA
Thank you kindly🤍
When watching, you have to remember that a camera, even a good one, struggles to render colours properly. Natural ultramarine is even richer and more vibrant in person.
Absolutely! Nothing beats seeing these amazing paintings in person!
well done
To me, blue and gold speaks of earthly/worldly riches.
Blue white and gold feels like it speaks of heavenly/spiritual riches.
A lovely thought!
At least real top quality natural ultramarine is still made, usually for conservation and icon making. Still incredibly expensive, though!
I'll stick with my beloved French Ultramarine 😄
thank you...
Enlightening to know the etymology of the name.
She is intellectual in her communication
💙💙💙
Wait, the Warhammer Ultramarines are just named after a colour?
This is Jimmy Space tier.
Interesting thats why i come
The Church had the monopoly on blue for use as the color associated with the Vigin Mary. The Northern Renaissance painters used red as their coror for the Virgin Mary.
👀
Ultramarine blue now is not at all like it was in history.
It is a hue now, not a pigment.
Infact, the blue now is an icy blue, not with any warm tints.
It is not versatile as pthalo blue is.
It’s only asset is that is good in mixing with other colors.
I was confusing this with blue pigment made from sea snails.
purpur is more expensive
minecraft brought me here 🤣
Can't believe the British Museum stole even the color blue :(
Afghanistan source.
Close to Faizabad, capital of Badakshan in N/E Afghanistan. Visited commander controlling the mines in 1990 - a powerful. jocular figure. More than likely ousted by Taliban.
How good art documentaries should be.
Ie ego absent from the presenter as opposed to most unbearable ones who shall remain nameless.