As a Computer Engineer, I can say that information can only come from an intelligent source and your DNA is full of information. The moment that information can construct itself is the moment when I am not longer needed to program applications. Of course, they don't create themselves and I have a job because of it. This is not an anti-Science position. Those who claim that Intelligent Design is not science need to acknowledge the fact that their computer, the internet and their software were all intelligently designed in the field of Computer Science. To claim that I cannot acknowledge God in the creation of the Universe is like saying I cannot acknowledge Man in the creation of the Computer.
You don't have to give 10% of your earning if you don't want too, but it's biblical to give 10% as Tithe to God because he blessed you with everything you have in the first place. There are people in the SDA church who don't give Tithe and there are many who give more than 10%. It's not rubbish. People give money so that others can hear messages like these, and for me it was nice to hear this message. NOTHING IS FREE. Jesus died for us and if we believe in him and build a relationship with him..
Why do we always attack the speaker and not listen to the word of God that is being preached/teach? Why not listen to what he has to say, go to the bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and see if it is truth or not. If you don't believe in God or salvation then you really don't have a purpose in life.
One of the greatest techniques of Barnum Baily was his ability to draw an audience appealing to one's emotions. The persecuted church of the Middle Ages would not include SDA teachers like Mr. Asscherick. Prophecy Seminars sponsored by Bachelor, Asscherick, and the like always hide the controversial topic of Investigative Judgment. Why ? This is the central tenet of SDA doctine/ It has led to defroking to countless leaders. It is an essential SDA belief..FUZZY MATH !
No need to apologize; it's irrelevant where in the buybull something is found, since what's important is if it has been verified or not. And besides citing actual people who lived, various cities and countries, there's not much truth in the buybull
I don't understand why people have to judge others! You have no right to judge David. If you only knew who he was before he found God, you wouldn't be saying things like you do! He knows everything about the Bible! Praise Father God! Give Glory to our Father in heaven! and Jesus Christ! praise the Lord! God bless you David!
so we can have eternal life. Also, in scripture Children did preach the word of God! There is actually prophecy surrounding what your saying, and along those lines, Jesus tells us to have the Faith of a child. Matthew 18:4.
It's a stupid idea to give to a church, since, as the evidence suggests with Adventist Corporation they only use about 8% of what they take in to "help others"...the rest trickles into various pockets. If you want to help someone, great, but do it directly as it will have the most effect.
Before you argue with someone ask, "is this person psychologically and emotionally mature enough to grasp the concept of different perspective?" If not there's no point in arguing. On religious issues the question is, "does this person believe that the Bible is true? If not there's also no point in arguing.
explain this, sceptic s: how is it I feel so gynormously loved? so gloriously and majesticly loved? this is how He chose to reveal Himself on Earth. If you don't feel God's love......I'm sorry for you. I can only say he came unto 'his own' (IDIOS= a man with his own opinions) and his own received him not. perhaps discard all your own opinions or whatever because I would want everyone to feel like they've had a blood transfusion with glow stik juice.😂
Of course Darwin called evolution a hypothesis. If you had any understanding of science you would understand that a hypothesis must under peer scrutiny through falcification to be called a theory. Evolution has stood up to every attempt of falcification which is why we still have biology which hinges on the theory of evolution.
Jesus is real. You must go around on every religious page (any religion) and start posting hate, and other various "opinions". From your perspective, I can say that nothing you say is valid. You can't prove God isn't real.
As soon as you actually learn what a scientific theory is and what evolution actually says we can have an discussion. Here are a few quick things: 1. Its called the theory of gravity, not the law of gravity. Thank you for demonstrating it. So because its the theory of gravity you are going to discount it now and start believing that your "clicker" is going to float in the air. 2. Yes the theory of evolution has no idea where life comes from, its not what its purpose of the theory. The purpose is to explain how natural selection and mutation can be responsible for the diversity of life. 3. You take Genesis as it stand word for word. So you believe the moon gives light. Not reflects it. Gen 1:16 " Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night," So what now, we have been to the moon and it doesn't give light. So in Genesis 1:16 it should then have said God made a Great light and a object to reflect light, the greater light to rule the day, and the reflector to rule the night." for your argument to stand. Clever of you to skip that part. 4. The theory of evolution is not a believe, if there is something that proof it is wrong it will be thrown out tomorrow. That is why scientist argue and test and rework the theory. Its not static. 5. There is no difference between micro and macro evolution. Its just evolution. Only creationists distinguish between them, because they cannot refute micro evolution. I am a Christian, my problem is not with God or the Bible but with these people who tell me what to believe and that its all black and white. I can give so many more examples of where David is wrong with his assumptions.
+Mike Huber You are wrong from your very first "quick thing." One of the greatest intellectual minds in history, Sir Isaac Newton, who was also a huge believer in not only God and the Bible but also the Genesis account of Creation, deduced this irrefutable LAW of Gravity, not the "theory of gravity.".Go outside, throw a 10-lb bowling ball high in the air, then stand directly under it with your hands down. Write back to me and tell me if you believe gravity is a "theory" or a law.So there's that............
+Mark Roman Here is a definition for a scientific theory:A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.Here is the difference between the law and theory: Both scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. Theories are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or several laws.And lastly There is a law of gravity AND a theory of gravity. The law of gravity tells us how gravity affects things. The theories of gravity are explanations of why gravity affects things
+Mike Huber 1) There is a difference between micro & macro evolution-a HUGE difference.....2) Evolution is NOT science, rather it is a worldview. To be science it has to be observable, testable & repeatable--macro-evolution has never been any of those.....3) Mutation is a LOSS of info--hence it can't lead to "evolution". Please learn BASIC SCIENCE before you post on the subject. DNA only ruins, rearranges or removes existing info. ...4) NO, your problem isn't with young earth creationists...it is with the Word of God (and science I would argue).
Jane20121985 1) No there isn't. Science makes no distinction between the two. 2) Evolution has been observed, tested & repeated in the lab. 3)This is not true. Red Hair is a mutation, no information was lost. 4)You replay shows your ignorance.
+Mike Huber, I am a born-again atheist and I say 'Amen' to your points of view on scientific theory and evolution. To regard 'theologically sound' arguments as the only black and white truth is intellectual dishonesty!
Ask a hard core follower like David....where was Jesus at when Stephen was stoned and he had a vision before dying ? Don't tell me it's symbolic. Then ask, why does Ellen White teach differently then the apostle Stephen who easily stated Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father as our active mediator. Why was the veil ripped apart when Jesus died on the cross; meanwhile, Ellen White claims that this same veil or "door" still remains as a "barrier" to mankind. Still more work for Jesus
3 beings are your father, smh. Incorrect bible says that The Father is our Father, Jesus is our elder Brother and the Spirit is the PRESENCE OF CHRIST in the heart
The wages of sin is death? If this is true then it is logically more sound to conclude that Jesus died because he too has sinned than that he died for the sins of mankind! His death is the wages of his sins, not yours and mine since he lived and died close to some 2000 years before us.
David Asscherik is NOT the "reliable source of truth". He teaches from the bible, which is the truth. He has done lots of studying and has a degree in Theology, and that has prepared him to teach the bible from others who have learned from the bible. Kind of like Jesus to Peter.
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Music Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
THANK GOD Above there are intelligent Men on this Earth like David Asscherick tO shed light on The Truth ~What a beautiful Mind
God be with you david still remain the same
As a Computer Engineer, I can say that information can only come from an intelligent source and your DNA is full of information. The moment that information can construct itself is the moment when I am not longer needed to program applications. Of course, they don't create themselves and I have a job because of it. This is not an anti-Science position.
Those who claim that Intelligent Design is not science need to acknowledge the fact that their computer, the internet and their software were all intelligently designed in the field of Computer Science. To claim that I cannot acknowledge God in the creation of the Universe is like saying I cannot acknowledge Man in the creation of the Computer.
Love this analogy!
I have been blessed!
Just show US, how Great is our Beautiful Father in Heaven is.💑🙏 our curator.🌏
You don't have to give 10% of your earning if you don't want too, but it's biblical to give 10% as Tithe to God because he blessed you with everything you have in the first place. There are people in the SDA church who don't give Tithe and there are many who give more than 10%. It's not rubbish. People give money so that others can hear messages like these, and for me it was nice to hear this message. NOTHING IS FREE. Jesus died for us and if we believe in him and build a relationship with him..
He's not selling anything. He is simply preaching creation from a Christian point of view, ironically as a former Atheist.
God loves you even if He is rejected.
I believe everything that is verifiable, and nothing that is not.
Is anything 'theologically sound' sound or sounds? Amen.
Why do we always attack the speaker and not listen to the word of God that is being preached/teach? Why not listen to what he has to say, go to the bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and see if it is truth or not. If you don't believe in God or salvation then you really don't have a purpose in life.
The most intelligent and philosophical minds in the world are Christ(ian) minds.
One of the greatest techniques of Barnum Baily was his ability to draw an audience appealing to one's emotions. The persecuted church of the Middle Ages would not include SDA teachers like Mr. Asscherick. Prophecy Seminars sponsored by Bachelor, Asscherick, and the like always hide the controversial topic of Investigative Judgment. Why ? This is the central tenet of SDA doctine/ It has led to defroking to countless leaders. It is an essential SDA belief..FUZZY MATH !
No need to apologize; it's irrelevant where in the buybull something is found, since what's important is if it has been verified or not. And besides citing actual people who lived, various cities and countries, there's not much truth in the buybull
I don't understand why people have to judge others! You have no right to judge David. If you only knew who he was before he found God, you wouldn't be saying things like you do! He knows everything about the Bible! Praise Father God! Give Glory to our Father in heaven! and Jesus Christ! praise the Lord! God bless you David!
What do you believe?
Sorry, Matthew 18:1-4. my mistake.
so we can have eternal life. Also, in scripture Children did preach the word of God! There is actually prophecy surrounding what your saying, and along those lines, Jesus tells us to have the Faith of a child. Matthew 18:4.
It's a stupid idea to give to a church, since, as the evidence suggests with Adventist Corporation they only use about 8% of what they take in to "help others"...the rest trickles into various pockets.
If you want to help someone, great, but do it directly as it will have the most effect.
It's fun to listen to pastors lie. And damn did I have fun watching this.
Before you argue with someone ask, "is this person psychologically and emotionally mature enough to grasp the concept of different perspective?" If not there's no point in arguing. On religious issues the question is, "does this person believe that the Bible is true? If not there's also no point in arguing.
explain this, sceptic s: how is it I feel so gynormously loved? so gloriously and majesticly loved? this is how He chose to reveal Himself on Earth. If you don't feel God's love......I'm sorry for you. I can only say he came unto 'his own' (IDIOS= a man with his own opinions) and his own received him not. perhaps discard all your own opinions or whatever because I would want everyone to feel like they've had a blood transfusion with glow stik juice.😂
Of course Darwin called evolution a hypothesis. If you had any understanding of science you would understand that a hypothesis must under peer scrutiny through falcification to be called a theory. Evolution has stood up to every attempt of falcification which is why we still have biology which hinges on the theory of evolution.
Jesus is real. You must go around on every religious page (any religion) and start posting hate, and other various "opinions". From your perspective, I can say that nothing you say is valid. You can't prove God isn't real.
As soon as you actually learn what a scientific theory is and what evolution actually says we can have an discussion.
Here are a few quick things:
1. Its called the theory of gravity, not the law of gravity. Thank you for demonstrating it. So because its the theory of gravity you are going to discount it now and start believing that your "clicker" is going to float in the air.
2. Yes the theory of evolution has no idea where life comes from, its not what its purpose of the theory. The purpose is to explain how natural selection and mutation can be responsible for the diversity of life.
3. You take Genesis as it stand word for word. So you believe the moon gives light. Not reflects it. Gen 1:16 " Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night," So what now, we have been to the moon and it doesn't give light. So in Genesis 1:16 it should then have said God made a Great light and a object to reflect light, the greater light to rule the day, and the reflector to rule the night." for your argument to stand. Clever of you to skip that part.
4. The theory of evolution is not a believe, if there is something that proof it is wrong it will be thrown out tomorrow. That is why scientist argue and test and rework the theory. Its not static.
5. There is no difference between micro and macro evolution. Its just evolution.
Only creationists distinguish between them, because they cannot refute micro evolution.
I am a Christian, my problem is not with God or the Bible but with these people who tell me what to believe and that its all black and white. I can give so many more examples of where David is wrong with his assumptions.
+Mike Huber You are wrong from your very first "quick thing." One of the greatest intellectual minds in history, Sir Isaac Newton, who was also a huge believer in not only God and the Bible but also the Genesis account of Creation, deduced this irrefutable LAW of Gravity, not the "theory of gravity.".Go outside, throw a 10-lb bowling ball high in the air, then stand directly under it with your hands down. Write back to me and tell me if you believe gravity is a "theory" or a law.So there's that............
+Mark Roman Here is a definition for a scientific theory:A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.Here is the difference between the law and theory:
Both scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. Theories are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or several laws.And lastly There is a law of gravity AND a theory of gravity. The law of gravity tells us how gravity affects things. The theories of gravity are explanations of why gravity affects things
+Mike Huber 1) There is a difference between micro & macro evolution-a HUGE difference.....2) Evolution is NOT science, rather it is a worldview. To be science it has to be observable, testable & repeatable--macro-evolution has never been any of those.....3) Mutation is a LOSS of info--hence it can't lead to "evolution". Please learn BASIC SCIENCE before you post on the subject. DNA only ruins, rearranges or removes existing info. ...4) NO, your problem isn't with young earth creationists...it is with the Word of God (and science I would argue).
Jane20121985
1) No there isn't. Science makes no distinction between the two.
2) Evolution has been observed, tested & repeated in the lab.
3)This is not true. Red Hair is a mutation, no information was lost.
4)You replay shows your ignorance.
+Mike Huber,
I am a born-again atheist and I say 'Amen' to your points of view on scientific theory and evolution. To regard 'theologically sound' arguments as the only black and white truth is intellectual dishonesty!
Ask a hard core follower like David....where was Jesus at when Stephen was stoned and he had a vision before dying ? Don't tell me it's symbolic. Then ask, why does Ellen White teach differently then the apostle Stephen who easily stated Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father as our active mediator. Why was the veil ripped apart when Jesus died on the cross; meanwhile, Ellen White claims that this same veil or "door" still remains as a "barrier" to mankind. Still more work for Jesus
This shit is spamming my history and we're gunna find out why
Maybe God is trying to tell you something
3 beings are your father, smh. Incorrect bible says that The Father is our Father, Jesus is our elder Brother and the Spirit is the PRESENCE OF CHRIST in the heart
jahdiel newman show me that in the Bible
The wages of sin is death? If this is true then it is logically more sound to conclude that Jesus died because he too has sinned than that he died for the sins of mankind! His death is the wages of his sins, not yours and mine since he lived and died close to some 2000 years before us.
David Asscherik is NOT the "reliable source of truth". He teaches from the bible, which is the truth. He has done lots of studying and has a degree in Theology, and that has prepared him to teach the bible from others who have learned from the bible. Kind of like Jesus to Peter.
explain how this is Propaganda