A watch brand you need to see - Titoni Seascoper 600

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 дек 2024

Комментарии • 64

  • @litesaber54yi3
    @litesaber54yi3 Год назад +7

    been waiting for a Totoni review on ANY channel for FOREVER!

  • @chubs41
    @chubs41 Год назад +5

    Titoni is so underrated. The 38-39mm cushion style Airmasters are so beautifully vintage. In my opinion, Titoni, Rado and Omega have some of the most beautiful vintage pieces and the cushion style Titoni Airmasters are probably the last of the vintage styled (not oversized, simple movement and reasonably priced) watches that one can still buy.

  • @skyraider1776
    @skyraider1776 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you, Bruce, for an excellent review. I picked up the two-tone version of the Seascoper, Reference 83600-SY-BK-256, a couple of years ago and have been extremely pleased with the watch in every respect. Ironically, Titoni was the brand that got me started into watch collecting back in the 80's and my old Airmaster is still going strong ! Just a great company to work with and an outstanding value IMHO. Thanks very much. Greg

    • @khalilbasma264
      @khalilbasma264 2 месяца назад

      Hello as an owner do you know if the t10 movement is essily serviceable by any chance or you have to be sending it direct to titoni for servicing, im considering this watch but the concern about serviceability is what's refraining me considering I live somewhere where its hard to really ship watches safely and cheaply back to a manufacturer in europe for servicing

  • @sadaka201
    @sadaka201 Год назад +7

    Finally! I have that Model. Best Diver you can get by far for the money. Oris, Longines and others are no match. Same league as a Tudor Black Bay, only better looking, IMO.

    • @SIZZO76
      @SIZZO76 Год назад

      Tudor is trash 😂😂😂

    • @sadaka201
      @sadaka201 Год назад

      @@SIZZO76 What are you trying to say?

    • @SIZZO76
      @SIZZO76 Год назад

      @@sadaka201 Tudor is a poor man’s Rolex and it is overrated 😂😂😂

    • @sadaka201
      @sadaka201 Год назад +1

      @@SIZZO76 Tudor is ok but as said not my style. I prefer the big brother. Got 3 pieces.

    • @SIZZO76
      @SIZZO76 Год назад

      @@sadaka201 I do to. Rolex is king 👑

  • @Barbecuejag
    @Barbecuejag Год назад +2

    Love Titoni. Definitely unsung in US. I have a Seascoper and an Airmaster. Both are highly accurate and well finished pieces. Great value for money indeed.

  • @sadaka201
    @sadaka201 Год назад +3

    As you said Bruce, looks very much like a Sea Dweller and the build quality ist top, and with the best clasp in the game. It's a winner!!

  • @omarion07
    @omarion07 Год назад +19

    If the Hydro Conquest and Pelagos 39 had a love child 😂

  • @al3xus03
    @al3xus03 Год назад +3

    Hey Bruce, why no details regarding the specs? Diameter, lug width, lug to lug? You used to measure those yourself and it was really helpful

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Год назад +4

      Ah sorry I normally always mention them but I must have forgot here. They are 41.9mm diameter, 52.0mm lug to lug, 13.9mm height, 20mm lugs and 18mm at the clasp

    • @al3xus03
      @al3xus03 Год назад +1

      @@BruceWilliams thanks 👍

  • @technoboy21
    @technoboy21 Год назад +11

    For a company with a history of 100 years, it's so hard for me to accept the fact that a model that is supposed to represent them, looks like a mix of several different watches (Rolex and Longines in this case). I don't see any original element in it, except maybe the hands. When I wear a watch, I don't want people to think it's a Rolex and find out it's not, I want them to see the original character of the watch I'm wearing.

  • @biblesnbarbells
    @biblesnbarbells 2 месяца назад +1

    I really like this watch. Thanks for the review. What would be the best way to purchase here in US?

  • @MrZanzibar123
    @MrZanzibar123 Год назад +2

    “Objectively better than a lot” you mentioned?! Which ones, Bruce? I can’t be the only one waiting for the other shoe to drop…. :)

  • @williambireley2529
    @williambireley2529 Год назад +2

    Thank you Bruce for this review! I’ve had my eye on the Titoni Seascoper 300- similar, but has a simpler design without numerals on the dial or bezel and a COSC Sellita, for less money. Its high on my list for a black diver at or less than $2k. I’d also love to see you review the new Seiko diver gmt spb383. I know you’re a Seikopath!

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Год назад +1

      That I am haha. Agreed the 300 looks great too

    • @ganck1147
      @ganck1147 Год назад +1

      I rec’d my seascoper 300 about 2 weeks ago & couldn’t stop wearing it. What a beautiful watch & its accuracy is astounding.

    • @ganck1147
      @ganck1147 Год назад

      @@cmbezln i feel that the quality of the bracelet is somewhat a little lagging behind compared to the watch itself. I m not saying it feels cheap or what but just feels a tad less high quality. But the micro adjustment on the clasp is well implemented. jus dun expect the bracelet to have that luxurious feel of watches in the 3k to 6k range. However, in its price range, the quality of the bracelet is adequate & pretty comfy.

    • @ganck1147
      @ganck1147 Год назад

      @@cmbezln no problem mate. 😊

  • @jamespalsson746
    @jamespalsson746 Год назад +3

    Looks better than a Hydro Conquest, which has similar markers. Agreed that the date placement is perfect, but I think they could attempt to slim the case down in thickness.

    • @williambireley2529
      @williambireley2529 Год назад +1

      The Seascoper 300 does have a slimmer case, gets rid of the helium escape valve and has COSC Sellita instead of the larger in house movement

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Год назад +1

      True the 300 is the slimer watch. I think the 600 is fine with height considering it's water resistance

  • @stanmann1984
    @stanmann1984 Год назад +1

    I would love to see a comparison between this piece and the Mido ocean star 600!

  • @Brainfreeze401
    @Brainfreeze401 Год назад +3

    Hey Bruce. I think you should do a review of the new longines conquest GMT.

  • @chandrasekharbhaskara6138
    @chandrasekharbhaskara6138 Год назад +1

    I own a Titoni master series in a chocolate fume dial .It’s got a chronometer certification and I got all of this at 1200 USD

  • @michaelbradley6488
    @michaelbradley6488 Год назад

    I have admired Titoni since around 2003, Reto used to sell them in the Poor Man's Watch Forum shop, yes, that is a sad story in itself, but that is where I first learned of them, nice review of a very nice watch.

  • @richardvanfrank8114
    @richardvanfrank8114 6 дней назад

    How heavy is this watch?

  • @xC4Rbonx
    @xC4Rbonx 11 месяцев назад +1

    My dad just gave me his Titoni cosmo king from the 1980s. 😁

  • @garysalisbury8949
    @garysalisbury8949 6 месяцев назад

    Im a big fan of this brand. Im sure if they got a few high profile reviews their brand awareness would rocket.

  • @Joe-km5zz
    @Joe-km5zz Год назад +1

    The watch is not bad and I would support independent watch maker like Oris and Titoni. I don't like Rolex style watch but still buy one for swimming.

  • @jacobelx5841
    @jacobelx5841 Год назад +1

    Longines just released HydroCon GMT. It’s becoming progressively harder to justify seeking the Rolex Sub…

  • @denisdaly1708
    @denisdaly1708 5 месяцев назад

    I have a Titoni impetus. It is magnificent, and it was under $1000.

  • @Emaratilfy
    @Emaratilfy Год назад

    Been eyeing Titoni divers for a while but I need them to make a 39mm with a slimmer case. That would be a winner and a serious competition to other high-end watches costing 2x more

  • @Gumby56
    @Gumby56 Год назад +1

    Gorgeous!!!

  • @angdarren5832
    @angdarren5832 Год назад

    This brand is really famous in china, the 1st swiss brand in china back in the days.

  • @nizarmurar
    @nizarmurar Год назад +1

    Many thanks Bruce for opening my mind .
    Great episode
    Nizar-Israel

  • @craigwthomson
    @craigwthomson Год назад +3

    I’ve had my eye on this one for a while! I was hoping they’d stay under the radar to let me pick up a pre-owned bargain! 😂

  • @ejames6431
    @ejames6431 Год назад

    Very nice watch! 👍

  • @vdbdg
    @vdbdg Год назад

    Well, you’d think in over a hundred years of existence they’d have come up with something a bit more original than an affordable Sub in every colour. I wanna root for the underdog but we’re really aiming as low as possible here

  • @EricZ726
    @EricZ726 Месяц назад

    Never seen anyone ever wearing this brand

  • @bigmacdaddy1234
    @bigmacdaddy1234 Год назад +1

    Looks like they use a MontBlanc logo.

  • @JASONvsBOSCO
    @JASONvsBOSCO Год назад

    I don’t see originality when I look at this watch. You have to dig deep. The watches you used for comparison are far more original to me.

  • @michaelkilbride2927
    @michaelkilbride2927 2 месяца назад

    A very nice watch but the name it' just doesn't sound like a luxury watch more like a name for a Italian scooter titoni 125

  • @resjon7981
    @resjon7981 Год назад +1

    Its a Longines, its a Rolex, no its a Longines no its a Rolex! Very nice mismash of a few popular watches so its a no.

  • @paulkleijzen1317
    @paulkleijzen1317 Год назад +4

    Overpriced and unoriginal in my opinion, rather go look for some originality at Christopher ward, Monta, Baltic, Zelos, Longines, Otris, Farer

    • @rwong2024
      @rwong2024 Год назад +5

      I own this piece for 2 yrs and I can assure you it surpasses all of the brands you mentioned, technically and in finishing. The on-the-fly adjustment clasp alone is unparalleled and only found in higher end brands for instance GO. Their manufactured movement is solid and its winding action is buttery smooth, not to say it's decently decorated. None of the brands in your list comes close to it quality-wise. As a side note I only have a small collection of 30 pieces ranging from Seiko/Chinese knockoffs to Cartier/Rolex, so pls take my humble opinion only as an additional piece of reference to Bruce's review. Cheers.

    • @bigmacdaddy1234
      @bigmacdaddy1234 Год назад +3

      None of the watches you rattled off are original either. Lol....

  • @tonymendez8805
    @tonymendez8805 Год назад

    The lug to lug is too long, deal breaker for me

  • @Jollopukki2
    @Jollopukki2 Год назад

    copy of Longines for a price of Longines ...

  • @mo92783
    @mo92783 Год назад

    !!!!!!!!!!!

  • @code6400
    @code6400 Год назад

    I think too pricey and to much bulky.

    • @sadaka201
      @sadaka201 Год назад

      Haha, you habe no clue dude!