Pitzmann II - The second watch from this Micro-brand

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024

Комментарии • 298

  • @frankguentzel8078
    @frankguentzel8078 Год назад +69

    I am quite stunned at the extent of negative comments on a review of a seriously well build and good looking watch and the amount of watch snobbery. I don’t care one bit where a watch is made or the brand name or the history of a brand . I trust Peter’s judgement when comparing watches to the ones he has personal experience with. Pitzmann released a great watch at a great price and one should give them the respect they deserve.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +19

      I think it comes down to people maybe not knowing me and my viewpoint, so thus some of the negativity
      I did approach this review with considerable zeal as I feel the watch is really well built and executed nicely as you said, but sometimes people read things into situations that don't exist
      Whatever the case, the watch is pretty impressive for a sub $1000 unit..and its still on my wrist as I type this reply
      Thanks for sharing Frank 👍

    • @willee5348
      @willee5348 Год назад +14

      Also people get weird when you compare an affordable watch to their $6000 watch. That's something that will not change. But he's doing a great job. Let's help him get the view he deserves.

    • @michelesfakianakis6144
      @michelesfakianakis6144 Год назад +2

      Hello where i can buy It.Thanks a prior

    • @ladykoala208
      @ladykoala208 Год назад +5

      Well said Frank! There is nothing I hate more than watch snobbery. If people don’t like the watch it’s simple, don’t bloody buy it and keep your snobbery in check! I’ve been watching Pete’s channel for months now and he calls it as he sees it. I like the watch, it has an excellent movement and the price is super reasonable.

    • @Chris-de2qc
      @Chris-de2qc 2 месяца назад

      Well now it's $1200...

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches Год назад +35

    Woooah I’ve never seen this watch before but I’m glad to know about it now! The finishing looks gorgeous

    • @Noogabar
      @Noogabar Год назад

      Do a review!!!

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      It really is Britt, I am still wearing this many days after the review.
      Its like a daily AT without the high cost of scratching it up when Im on the tools 😊

    • @watchyourself5500
      @watchyourself5500 Год назад

      Britt! Please review this watch!😁

  • @scotthetrick5057
    @scotthetrick5057 Год назад +5

    Recently received my Pitzmann II. I'm in love with it. Beautiful watch. Pitzmann customer service was excellent.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      Great stuff, I was wearing mine today...enjoy it 👍

  • @certainly2509
    @certainly2509 Год назад +26

    This is a microbrand on a whole other level. Beautiful design and level of quality that puts many of the Swiss brands to shame.

  • @roamy3605
    @roamy3605 Год назад +8

    The word that comes to mind is Wow! This is how a Micro-brand should be making a watch at this price point.

  • @legionnairegonk4425
    @legionnairegonk4425 Год назад +7

    Any watch without a date function gets a fair go with me. Add in a good movement, great build and finishing and a handsome/ smart design and it's a winning formula 👍.

  • @Swiss_Army_Knife1780
    @Swiss_Army_Knife1780 Год назад +12

    Appreciate your in-depth reviews of the Pitzmann watches.
    I prefer the first yet am grateful to see reviewers feature this microbrand.

  • @rhoever
    @rhoever Год назад +7

    You’re right, it’s a stunner. Bravo Pitzmann!

  • @nikkolomakaveli8295
    @nikkolomakaveli8295 Год назад +6

    Dear G0d Peter!!!
    Another amazing microbrand and it has great lume!?!? For the price this watch is captivating.

  • @R8Prototype
    @R8Prototype Год назад +12

    Love my pitzmann first, this second one is looking pretty good! Especially the high polished indices. I agree about pitzmann crowns, I wish they were a touch larger and grippier, it's not as easy to wind and set the time. You're right about the bezel - it does remind me a bit of my ball enterprise

  • @gregs.8895
    @gregs.8895 Год назад +12

    I dig the green, initially got CW vibes, but after watching the vid, there are lots of differences to set it apart. Thanks for showing it off.

  • @JasonTheWatchGuy
    @JasonTheWatchGuy Год назад +9

    That is a really gorgeous watch! 150m WR, how unusual...Definitely a brand I will be looking out for

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +3

      Im still wearing this days after the review, its been a great experience on the wrist Jason 👍

  • @StalingradWatch
    @StalingradWatch Год назад +4

    this is a microbrand, I had one by myself, what I can say it this watches is value for the money, its quality is reach to Grand Seiko and Omega even, but price is quite low, a good deal.

  • @PKVKishan
    @PKVKishan Год назад +14

    Yet another amazing review. You are my favourite watch content creator, Peter. Hats off to you.

  • @Sam_D
    @Sam_D Год назад +6

    Beautiful watch! Pitzmann is on the right path. I think we will see more Korean brands in the near future and it's good. Thank you for another great review. 👍

  • @denisdaly1708
    @denisdaly1708 Год назад +5

    I'm impressed.

  • @WATCHingJames
    @WATCHingJames Год назад +5

    Great to see this one. I can see why it has impressed you.

  • @grahambeer8179
    @grahambeer8179 Год назад +4

    This is a SERIOUSLY beautiful watch!

  • @simunijima3327
    @simunijima3327 Год назад +7

    honestly, you are one of, if not the best watch channel on youtube.
    Everytime you make a new video, you do something new, cool and interesting.
    Thank you for amazing videos :)

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      Wow, thank you, but you are far too kind 🙏

  • @roarksjuror4752
    @roarksjuror4752 Год назад +4

    Great looking watch with some impressive specs. I've been looking for a GADA watch and this one just made the list.

  • @sholtobyrnes2210
    @sholtobyrnes2210 Год назад +2

    One of the classiest watch youtubers out there, videos always beautifully shot and very informative. Thank you

  • @johnsinclair2672
    @johnsinclair2672 Год назад +7

    I think it’s a great dress sports option.

  • @timetowatch_francois
    @timetowatch_francois Год назад +9

    I loved the first Pitzmann; it was a looker and much different from this second version.
    I like that they have a completely new design and find that this one is more of a daily wear vs their first version.
    I’d jump on this one w/o any hesitation vs the previous version.
    Great execution. Thanks for sharing!

  • @SingleTrackMined
    @SingleTrackMined Год назад +3

    Beautiful and classy. A microbrand to keep an eye on.

  • @anonymouswatchguy4223
    @anonymouswatchguy4223 Год назад +4

    Gorgeous piece..definitely one to consider

  • @humanitech
    @humanitech Год назад +3

    Interesting brand and another great new design. As personally I like any company that produces uncluttered classical watch dials .... without all the visual fuss and needless clutter of day!date complications etc.

  • @SunsetSheen
    @SunsetSheen Год назад +5

    An applied logo and female end links would've made this piece unbeatable

  • @gotshpilkes
    @gotshpilkes Год назад +6

    Nice watch, It looks like they could double the price and still offer good value.

  • @WatchAddictionReviews
    @WatchAddictionReviews Год назад +4

    very nice quality indeed 🥂

  • @martinharrison4245
    @martinharrison4245 Год назад +8

    Im not generally a micro brand fan, but the overall quality of this , is fantastic for the money. companies like omega , rolex and tudor , seem set on increasing the prices on their watches , at an alarming rate, without much improvement on their models. I know microbrands don't spend as much on advertising etc, but it does make you think , are you just paying for a name ? Great video as always peter.

  • @denisdaly1708
    @denisdaly1708 Год назад +6

    It's a luxury watch, and affordable

  • @kenanpopovcevic1075
    @kenanpopovcevic1075 Год назад +8

    Looks nice, a bit of a similar vibe to Christopher Ward but way nicer indicies. I feel like semi-skeleton hands something like Omega or Zenith would fit this one perfectly, also would love date on this

  • @davebudd1429
    @davebudd1429 Год назад +3

    love this watch. Great review--you're my favorite reviewer. You and Average Bros. Thank you!

  • @timmanning5357
    @timmanning5357 Год назад +1

    If this watch brand follows the evolution of Korean car manufacturing then I can't wait to see future releases from Pitzmann.
    Hopefully a quality robust tool watch built to take some beating 🙏
    Awesome watches 👍

  • @lpblade7
    @lpblade7 Год назад +4

    Looks like you won't be able to take that one off! Great piece and great review, definitely did the watch justice.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      Its still on my wrist as I type this reply 😊😂

  • @Keeperofthekey13
    @Keeperofthekey13 Год назад +4

    Great looking piece Peter. I like it very much.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      Me too Peter, its really confutable and well finished
      A solid piece for the money thats for sure

  • @UltraDoug
    @UltraDoug Год назад +4

    Really beautiful. These days that 10mm and under thickness is a sweet spot for me. Like my Nomos Sport 42” with 300 meter w/r. It’s almost become a deal breaker for me. Excellent video as always 😎👍🏼

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      👍

    • @marcusrawlinson5024
      @marcusrawlinson5024 Год назад +3

      I very much agree about thickness, it's why my money went to Damasko for the DS30.

    • @UltraDoug
      @UltraDoug Год назад +1

      @@marcusrawlinson5024 oh man that’s nice. Never saw that before. A simple beauty 👍🏼

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson5961 Год назад +4

    I've heard the Reason Rolex doesn't put anti reflective coating on the glass is so the owners can see their selves 🤗

  • @byrong1561
    @byrong1561 Год назад +6

    Some of these micro brands offer outstanding value for money and there will always be a market for well made watches like this. However, the fact they are made in Asia not Switzerland ensures they will always be overlooked by watch snobs, regardless of the quality

  • @bboooobbyy
    @bboooobbyy Год назад +3

    These guys make a pretty good mustard!

  • @phildupuis1084
    @phildupuis1084 Год назад +3

    What a beauty. Great value for the money.

  • @BowlOfSalmon
    @BowlOfSalmon Год назад +4

    Enjoyed the review. Sponsored or not. Felt honest. Keep em coming

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      Thanks, will do!🙏
      As for honesty, I get more than enough watches weekly, that doesn't phase me, I admire good quality and design , so I gotta say it as I see it and the way it makes me feel cheers

  • @johnnychen235
    @johnnychen235 Год назад +9

    Hi Peter, would you pay $1000 for this?

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +10

      From the images on their website I have to say NO.
      However having this in the hand and experiencing it all week, I have no reservations for a big YES.
      I am really pleased with the finish and detail not to mention comfort and functionality (this green one has been superb and does everything my Omega does but for a fraction of the price
      I am very pleased with he stability of the movement and the 56hr power reserve, juts like my Omega
      Hope that helps Johhny

    • @johnnychen235
      @johnnychen235 Год назад +2

      Thank you. Love this green. Will consider getting this one. Great video.

  • @richardwilson3364
    @richardwilson3364 Год назад +10

    I like that they've tried to incorporate Korean design heritage into the case design, but that approach should extend into the branding IMO.
    It'd be much better to go with a Korean name than a knock-off Swiss sounding one

    • @MrR2185
      @MrR2185 Год назад +4

      I was curious myself, about the name. I could not find anything on their website regarding it. I'd rather have a real Korean name as well, it just would go better with theme of the watch.

    • @LeftThumbBreak
      @LeftThumbBreak Год назад +3

      Yes, like Ming, Seiko and other asian brands. It's a fine history of watch making. No need to sound British or whatever Pitzman is supposed to be.

    • @yjlconductor
      @yjlconductor Год назад

      I agree. Something to do with historical Korean horology would have been nice.

    • @jimgarvey48
      @jimgarvey48 Год назад

      Y'all are so far up your own asses it's funny😊

  • @corvinius3
    @corvinius3 Год назад +3

    Thats a beautiful watch. Ive added that on my list.

  • @martinkaplan1805
    @martinkaplan1805 Год назад +1

    A lovely watch in every way. It’s ticks all the boxes except brand recognition. This is just my style of watch, but I have one too many in this style. But I’d sure like to see it in person.

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville Год назад +2

    I wasn't too into this until you showed the price. That watch is absolutely worth that price. I'm not a huge fan of that dial, the grey is much more interesting to me and the case is awesome, reminds me of a Ming or FPJ, great lugs. Honestly I was expecting closer to $2k, easily. Give an AT a run for its money though? No.

    • @Donnybrook10
      @Donnybrook10 Год назад

      ??????????!!! Please justify this comment. How is it "worth that price"? The dial is the only part of this watch this company produces. And we aren't even sure they do.

  • @WordMadeFlesh777
    @WordMadeFlesh777 Год назад +2

    Crikey! Took the words right out me mouth mate!

  • @joeskeptical4762
    @joeskeptical4762 Год назад +2

    *Make us happy and on-time.*

  • @dimitriosmyzithras6491
    @dimitriosmyzithras6491 Год назад +4

    I agree about the double-dome, disagree about the crown. If it were smaller the watch would look more "delicate". Very nice looking watch! Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Should we expect more colour choices anytime soon?

    • @chrishennemeyer7276
      @chrishennemeyer7276 Год назад +3

      You misunderstood. He said the crown should be .5mm bigger, not smaller.

    • @dimitriosmyzithras6491
      @dimitriosmyzithras6491 Год назад +2

      @@chrishennemeyer7276 Indeed! That makes sense 👍

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +3

      I forgot to mention there are three colourways, green, blue and a greyish/black
      Thanks for bringing that to my attention 👍

  • @jerryglasses2229
    @jerryglasses2229 Год назад +7

    I don't get why people think this watch is over priced. If any of the big brands made this it would be 2 or 3 times the price. Even if Pitzmann isn't manufacturing themselves these not some generic parts. The markers are fantastic. And the case and bezel look very nice. You don't see bezels like that.

  • @smgeraldo
    @smgeraldo Год назад +6

    Very good review as always, well done Pete. Ignore the watch snobs and their silly negativity/snobbery, they’re not true enthusiasts, their loss mate. For me if it had a date complication at the 6 position, I would seriously consider having one.
    👍👍👍

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      I’m normally a date guy as well, but I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this as a time only watch
      Thanks for the encouragement 🙏

  • @VersedNJ
    @VersedNJ Год назад +3

    Great looking watch, wish they came out with a red or other bright color. Want something abit more fun for the upcoming spring an summer. The price is fair at $1000US.

  • @roarksjuror4752
    @roarksjuror4752 Год назад +2

    Great photography... And good to see a channel from a fellow Melburnian. Subbed!

  • @vicentvanmole
    @vicentvanmole 17 дней назад +1

    indeed ,very nice looking with . There quartz dial is best looking ,only wish it has a mechanic movt . Thanks for good review

  • @shiznuts
    @shiznuts Год назад +2

    I like it, would've loved it probably though if it didn't have the circular rings on the dial along the hour markers.

  • @jeffc4399
    @jeffc4399 Год назад +2

    Nice! Good introduction to a brand I’ve never heard about. Definitely going to check them out. First I’ve heard about a Korean brand. Just subbed!

  • @christoschristodoulou4117
    @christoschristodoulou4117 9 месяцев назад +1

    This look stunning. So Grand Seiko

  • @HaonProductions
    @HaonProductions Год назад +2

    Sign my skinny wrist up for a 36mm version of this. I've got 3 or 4 watches I could see this replacing - would love an excuse to size down. As it stands though, I can see this watch eating Christopher Ward's lunch and drawing people away from, say, Tudor. Love a second release that improves on a brand's potential - a proper Terminator 2!

  • @monarchtimepiececollection
    @monarchtimepiececollection Год назад +2

    That’s a great looking watch! Great review!!

  • @rickreid1181
    @rickreid1181 Год назад +5

    Sweet watch

  • @tancreddehauteville764
    @tancreddehauteville764 Год назад +6

    Great watch, but I'd say it competes more with Ball and Longines rather than Omega; glad to see the SW300 instead of the ubiquitous SW200. As with the previous model, it's a shade too expensive in my opinion. I would like to see it on sale for $750-800 and then it would be a strong competitor - it does look very 'Ball like', perhaps with even better finishing.

  • @johnmonachelli5256
    @johnmonachelli5256 Год назад +2

    Beautiful piece well done

  • @finesse49
    @finesse49 Год назад +3

    Very nice. 2-4mm smaller and a few hundred less expensive and I'd be all over it.

  • @WestCoastAce27
    @WestCoastAce27 5 месяцев назад

    Beautiful. Although we can agree to disagree that it’s a sports watch.

  • @williamrizzo1285
    @williamrizzo1285 Год назад +2

    I'm a sucker of the smooth bezel and stick indices on a bracelet, having said that I would prefer 41 or 42mm.

  • @xchazz86
    @xchazz86 Год назад +4

    That actually looks better than the Aquaterra, with exception of the hands.

  • @JRW33
    @JRW33 Год назад +3

    Certainly no Omega but a fair price for a solid looking watch in 2023, especially considering recent hikes in labour/material (and everything else) costs.

  • @Android_MT1983
    @Android_MT1983 Год назад +2

    Just wow!!

  • @michaelcollins2473
    @michaelcollins2473 Год назад +4

    Good review. It's very reminiscent of a Ball Engineer. I do think for $1k, it's a little pricey, but over all, very nice.

  • @barrettgarese2267
    @barrettgarese2267 Год назад +2

    Reminds me of an OP41 but with personality. I think I'd prefer a microadjustment on the bracelet, but I've been spoiled there. Beyond that - damn good looking watch.

  • @samnathan2709
    @samnathan2709 Год назад +2

    Very attractive watch

  • @benjaminvis
    @benjaminvis Год назад +5

    Omega designs always seem to have a hard time completely winning me over. To have something approaching their quality in finish and refinement wearing it with design cues I'm immediately more interested in means this has made my 'to watch' watch list instantly. Of course it might seem easily done to incorporate a few subtle cultural elements to make one's microbrand design stand out, but it's rare to see it succeed to such balanced results. It helps I'm also convinced of the upgrade the SW300 offers over the SW200 that so many use. I wish more would opt for the SW300, especially now that they've upgrades the power reserve. The video you linked to explaining the process of designing and the finishes chosen in such detail is simply exemplary. All serious microbrands should attempt this. To clarify, the one you've shown is the production versio and now the prototype they used in their video? And as a matter of detail: the slope towards the inner dial of the markers, is that a simple diagonal bevel also also a rounded concave giwa shape? The price (pre import, presumably) is not something I'd spend so easily, but yes, I can imagine one finding its way onto my wrist one day. My negatives, for balance, include a brand name that while seemingly inoffensive just doesn't have a nice ring to it somehow, and a latent fear that perhaps it's not exciting enough... but then the subtleties seem to be exactly the point of this design.

  • @Laz_Arus
    @Laz_Arus Год назад +6

    Thanks, Peter, for bringing this brand to my attention. I find the design quite cohesive and mature. A question about the lume if I may ... if fully charged just before sleep, do you think it would maintain 6 hours of visibility to dark-adjusted eyes? That's my criteria for acceptance. Love your balanced reviews. 👍

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      6 hours, probably not
      But I’d say like my Aqua Terra closer to 4 and a bit

    • @watchyourself5500
      @watchyourself5500 Год назад +1

      Well. I tried it. Yes. I was able to check the time. 10pm-5am.

  • @citibear57
    @citibear57 Год назад +2

    Beautiful watch. I like it. I am not a watch snob, as my current and previous watches are by Timex. Did I miss seeing the price? No matter, I probably couldn't afford it anyway. Did I mention that I think this is a beautiful watch? Yes, of course I did.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      $999 👍

    • @citibear57
      @citibear57 Год назад +2

      @@PeterKotsa Thank you, Peter. That's a reasonable price for a very nice watch.

  • @joshuaychung
    @joshuaychung Год назад +5

    A Korean watch? I have a bunch of Japanese watches. I got a Chinese watch. I feel like I should get a Korean watch just to complete the North East Asia trifecta. Does anyone have experiences with the warranty support and whatnot? It uses a SW-300, so I don't think the service will be an issue, but the warranty support may be.

    • @jonathanyng
      @jonathanyng Год назад

      Lol what Chinese watch you got bro?

    • @joshuaychung
      @joshuaychung Год назад

      @@jonathanyng A Sea-Gull 1963

    • @jonathanyng
      @jonathanyng Год назад

      @@joshuaychung nice, how's it? I have a haofa that's a Chinese tourbillon and an undone Terra, I think that's from Hong Kong.

    • @joshuaychung
      @joshuaychung Год назад

      @@jonathanyng It's great so far. I love the fact that it's so loud and proud of being a Chinese watch. I'm not Chinese but love to show off the Chinese characters that took me forever to decipher. =)

    • @jonathanyng
      @jonathanyng Год назад

      @J C you mean the "中国制造"?that just means "made in China" lol

  • @ginocolella6373
    @ginocolella6373 Год назад +1

    Fantastic looking watch 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻.. maybe female endlink and choice of choosing with date at six a clock? It’s a pitty that brands just does them without date, depressing ☺️

  • @stuartheyburn8741
    @stuartheyburn8741 Год назад +3

    I’m not a massive fan of this type of watch, except the Omega Aqua Terra which is a great watch.
    However, I like the look of this too, particularly the blue one on their website.
    Seems a bit pricey for what it is but still a nice watch.
    With regards to owning micro brands, I like to have a balance. Sometimes it is nice to know when you go somewhere you have a watch on no one else will have. Micro brands give you that exclusivity that you cannot always get from the likes of Omega, Tudor etc etc 👍

  • @IvanVoras
    @IvanVoras Год назад +1

    Reminds me a bit - and in the nicest way - of some of Casio 's Waveceptors like LCW M170TD-1A

  • @williamhill7312
    @williamhill7312 Год назад +1

    Excellent video

  • @gerrybailey447
    @gerrybailey447 Год назад +1

    Very similar to the tissot powermatic 80 so I like it as I have tissot in the same colour which I love.

  • @AlexanderB.
    @AlexanderB. Год назад +2

    The watch case is beautiful, no question about it. But the dial dies not impress me as I'm not a fan of the raised concentric circle section. In my eyes this doesn't look all that fancy.

  • @tedblack2415
    @tedblack2415 Год назад +2

    Beauty !

  • @gg.komorebi
    @gg.komorebi Год назад +1

    Very nice watch. An applied logo would be nice.

  • @MKGamingInvesting
    @MKGamingInvesting Год назад +1

    I would maybe get that as an exploring watch while still getting an AT

  • @artieshell9205
    @artieshell9205 Год назад +2

    Great video ? Do they come in different colors, or just the green? Thanks!

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      Yes three different colours, I neglected to mention..check out their website,
      Sorry Artie

    • @artieshell9205
      @artieshell9205 Год назад +2

      @@PeterKotsa perfect!!! My apologies. You actually wrote it in the description I saw later. Should have looked closer first. And also watched their video you linked. I’m intrigued !!

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      @@artieshell9205 👍

  • @BadGuyDennis
    @BadGuyDennis Год назад +1

    This piece reminders me of Omega De Ville Hour Vision instead.😜
    Nice review anyway

  • @ashleyslingers2814
    @ashleyslingers2814 Год назад +1

    looks awesome on the strap. Great review. Being eyeing Pitzmann indeed. Terrible website though lol

  • @leonkaragiann7552
    @leonkaragiann7552 Год назад +1

    Beautiful watch but expensive. Good review Peter!!

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      I thunk for a 1/10 of the price of my AT, this is doing pretty good 😊
      Thanks Leon 👍

  • @konww002
    @konww002 Год назад +2

    Is there any tapering on the bracelet?

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +3

      Yes slight, 20mm down to 17.9mm

  • @jamesminshall4601
    @jamesminshall4601 Год назад

    I’m not sure what to think off this, I love the dial but I would prefer a date. It looks really good on the green rubber strap.
    There are a few negatives, the bracelet doesn’t look great and the lugs look huge when it’s fitted. The worst part of the aqua terra is the clasp and bracelet, it might be fine for people that like to wear their watches loose but I could not buy one as it would annoy me to have to bin the bracelet. I don’t know why Pitzman or anyone would make something as flawed. Also the shape of the case is a little clumsy.
    It’s an impressive second watch but it’s quite pricey but I’m willing to try it for free.

  • @ET-cj8jo
    @ET-cj8jo 7 месяцев назад +1

    Lots of bonding !!

  • @karlsenula9495
    @karlsenula9495 Год назад +2

    I actually prefer the previous Pitzmann to this one ... this has definite Aqua Terra vibes, good specs but the rings on the dial make it a no for me ... just a personal style preference of course.

  • @MCMTL
    @MCMTL 5 месяцев назад +1

    Could you do a comparison video of the Seiko Alpinist and Pitzmann II? FYI, I'm about to receive my Pitzmann III ice blue dial which I ordered after watching your review.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  5 месяцев назад +1

      Congrats on the purchase...Im sure you'll love it 👍
      As for the Alpinist.I dont have one on hand atm..

    • @MCMTL
      @MCMTL 5 месяцев назад

      @@PeterKotsaJust to be clear,
      I mean the new Seiko Alpinist.
      ruclips.net/video/nIPmOH2eGNk/видео.html

  • @WNYfellow
    @WNYfellow Год назад +1

    I'm sold :-).

  • @steelsteez6118
    @steelsteez6118 Год назад

    0:28 keyword "almost" took all the fun away 😜

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      well spotted..for $999 it was always going to be an almost 😊

  • @richarddsmarais3865
    @richarddsmarais3865 Год назад +1

    Very nice! Cheers

  • @davidc5191
    @davidc5191 Год назад +1

    Very nice watch. The only thing I don't like are the hands: the hour and minute hands look too similar, especially when they line up in a row like at 5:49; and they look clunky. I'd prefer a sharper sword design, like in some Grand Seikos. I realize they're trying to make the hands mirror the hour marker indices, but you get that problem again when they line up and everything looks too similar. As noted by others, it bears this similarity with Ball watches, which also look clunky to me. I also recall the SW-300 has a date complication. Does that mean this watch has a "ghost" crown setting for the date function that doesn't exist?

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад

      There is NO ghost position on this 👍
      Single click

  • @infinity2x0
    @infinity2x0 Год назад +3

    As several folks have remarked, getting some Christopher Ward vibes. A comparison would be nice! I don't love the clasp. I felt like the brand logo on the clasp would have been better similar to how it is placed on the crown. The Giwa bezel design is interesting but I feel like it'll catch on things or get scratched up even if I don't intend to scratch it up. Indices are nice, would have appreciated a sped up 20 minute lume shot. The bracelet is slighty more industrial than I usually prefer but on this watch it works. Would have loved your take on how solid or not the bracelet was as well. I find that the bracelet and clasp are make or break for me. I don't care how lovely the case and dial are if the bracelet and clasp are cheap rattly junk.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      Solid bracelet well made and finished
      As for the lume, it’s like my Aqua Terra, not a dive watch but a sports
      Cheers

    • @infinity2x0
      @infinity2x0 Год назад +1

      @@PeterKotsa Appreciate the comment. Does the watch have good weight and presence? A sense of solidity that more affordable watches (and even some watches above this price range) don't have?

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +2

      @@infinity2x0 Now thats a great question..YES, absolutely YES
      Thats one thing you cant express in visuals and I am glad you asked. I still have the watch on my wrist today as its really satisfies. The build does not feel any different to my Omega, its really built and finished beautifully.
      Not a cheap feeling watch thats for sure.
      But as I said, I do not like the crystal and the crown could have been a tad larger.
      On a side note, I forgot to mention in the review that the male end links might present a problem to some
      On my 18cm wrist, ideal comfort, however on smaller wrists, the lug width is extended to 49.2mm
      My oversight 🙏

    • @infinity2x0
      @infinity2x0 Год назад +1

      @@PeterKotsa Very much appreciate your replies! Yes that is another concern I have, the sizing. I have a 16cm wrist (skinny guy) and so am worried it will not fit well. Like others have mentioned, a 36 mm size would be great but for a new micro brand, I fear it will be some time, if at all, that this will happen.

    • @PeterKotsa
      @PeterKotsa  Год назад +1

      @@infinity2x0 I hear you. On your wires this will probably wear closer to what a 42mm wears on my wrist.
      Even if it is 39.8mm
      You would be safer trying something with similar specs on before you commit, thats my advice 👍

  • @martinrousev
    @martinrousev Год назад

    I get that Omega in the title would bring more views but a comparison to Christopher Ward C63 would be farer as they are in the same price category and people shopping for one of these is more likely to have a look at the other.