They look at everything you do whether you are trying to be an influencer or not. Edward Snowden warned us about the data collection. As individuals, we must speak forth rather than remain quiet....
Eddy Snowblower warned us? While he was abusing and selling data. That's like the child molesters warning people about child molesters: You know, evangelicals preaching morality to children. Guys in gowns no undies citing scripture to kids is always a red flag.
I continue to hold the opinion I developed in the 70s: Marketing is the most soulless field one can make a career in. I grew up in a world that told me propagandistic mind control was coming for you and you had to be on your guard. They forgot to mention that Madison Avenue was perfecting it.
The only difference is the U.S. (or North America) will cut out the “middle man” of a government agency. I mean outsourcing the private sector to keep tabs on people…you can’t get any more American than _that_ 😞🤦♂️
As John pointed out, the fact that they gave Simone Biles an A grade after she just posted a red-hot political take means this software is extremely flawed.
Companies either will begin or have already been using AI to search potential hires for anything they dislike and you'll know that's why you didn't get the call back.
Why is it so hard for people on the left to understand that Cancel Culture and Boycotts are two different things? Boycott is when a group or individual says they will avoid a product for themselves. Cancel Culture is when an individual or group says they don't like a product and they don't want anybody to have access to it. Two totally different things.
I'm on the left used to be far left but this identity politics and cancel culture have become toxic. They have literally pushed me centrist because they have become unhinged. Cenk needs to reign in his employees.
@@jbsoileau79 The left used to be the cool party. The 'live and let live' party. I remember when it was the right that wanted to cancel 'Married with Children', and the left said if you don't like it, change the channel. How things have changed.
Brands are terrified of Influencers having an opinion? So Brands are attempting to disqualify Influencers from work based on an algorithm? And how does that algorithm differentiate between black, white, single parent, or a large family, were they grew up, etc? What is the grade for a single white male, a loner, never went to college, very interested in crime and punishment, poor self-esteem, very isolated, insecure and either grew up poor or inherited a bunch of money from their family? Would love to see grades for: Musk, Trump mass shooters? Food for Thought..
You are aware that Musk has been losing money from lack of ads since they don't want to post on X as much anymore. He's attempting to sue then over that.
@@gk_zone4274 And his slap suits are successful because the companies he targets like Media Matters don't have the money to fight back. Best believe many brands will come back if they don't think they can be held accountable.
They'd need to add an "F" category for myself. Because everything is indeed political. By the way: The WORST department at most companies are the marketing departments. Most are friends of administration family members, pet hires of administration, and overpaid goofballs that waste the budgets on terrible marketing. Disagree? Behind those terrible TV commercials are the very people I'm referring to. The holiday decorations in stores etc, assuming that affects sales? Halloween decorations are up. I hate Halloween because of the marketing. It used to be fun. AIPAC using catch words in the comments to get 1st Amendment shut down. While I'm not supportive of random hate and random hate speech, randomly murdering Palestinians, then randomly shutting down comments by Americans who don't like Genocidal Maniacs like Netanyahu and Putin? At some point, Americans will realize we actually did fine before the internet if that's what they want. Protests and product boycotts actually work. So have at it. Meanwhile: Bee Dee eS
.... except it's not A.I. ... it's a glorified chat bot .. that's like trying to enter a Formula 1 race with a golf cart ........... wow, companies are stupid. You'd think it'd be important to their business models to actually know WTF is going on but as someone who does some work in marketing .. I know that's not a priority for them ...
Take back your power, influencers. Choose a month and EVERY ONE OF YOU should talk about your political beliefs. Prove to the corporations that they cannot own your opinions. Organize!!!!!
Influencer pre-roll ads on RUclips are generally trash. However, they are ads, and often by people I don't know or care about, so it is really just about cheap ads and sidelining ad agencies who create real marketing campaigns and creative ads
No, Jordan, it doesn't work that way. You think it's okay for AI to filter on YOUR issues, but who gets to decide which issues are allowed or not? What if the people in charge of it think your views are problematic? If they start filtering people at all, then changing the filter is always just a keystroke away. This has to be stopped, period, on the grounds of protecting freedom of speech and the government has to start protecting people's free speech from corporate overreach.
Companies want to make money. Remember when Michael Jordan said “conservatives buy shoes too”. Just keep your mouth shut and sell your product to make maximum profit. Why annoy a large percentage of your customers?
Influencers still have the right to speak their minds. Nobody ever had a right to get a sponsorship deal. People saying this is the same as "social credit" need to get a grip. Influencers deemed "not suitable" for brands to use for advertising are not in danger of being imprisoned or worse. They just have to find a different way to make money. These are still somewhat famous people who have followers - which is more than most of us regular people have. They'll be fine. Brands shouldn't be getting involved in politics. Now if only the corporations that own said brands will also stop getting involved by making political donations. What's that I always hear people say? "Get big money out of politics!"
Sounds like corporations want their cake and eat it too. They don’t want their brand representatives to get involved in politics but these brands sure as heck are involved in politics by lobbying congress in their favor. I think companies are just inconvenienced by the fact that consumers are expecting companies to act more socially responsible. Something that Gen X and Boomers only paid lipservice and didn’t really care about
@@YouAreStillNotablaze I'm criticizing companies for being inconsistent - they don't want to be perceived as peddling political influence, which is why they want to stay away from influencers that are "too political". Yet companies do peddle influence with political donations. IMO companies ought to consistently stay out of politics. No sponsoring political influencers, and also no political donations. Companies not picking certain influencers for sponsorship deals is not a violation of those influencers' free speech rights.
This is all just about protecting product. This isn’t about consumer safety. This is all about business safety you’ve got a dangerous product or you’ve got a PR company that is putting out false propaganda you are going to limit or stop pushback. This is nothing to do with safety for the consumers or the general public. This is all about the business.
Risk minimisation is NOT a long term advertising strategy, it does nothing to get your message across. As such, this company should be able to milk corporations until they realise they are bogged down. Advertising is going through lots of changes but this one is, well, deeply flawed in the long run. Imho.
Look I’m an advertising art director. You can not expect businesses to risk sales by outspoken representatives of their brand. They are paying them to generate sales not lose them. So this whole conversation being given by people who have no clear understanding of the financial landscape of sales is a bit worthless
This shuts out voices of descent, suppressing opinions that run counter to corporate interests. This quite literally censors free speech and thought. Now, start looking at this from a different angle. What happens when they decide your opinion needs to be suppressed? Are you still okay with this? Something tells me you wouldn't be. They'll advertise how they want, that's their right. But there will be consequences to that, including losing sales from potential customers. It's a terrible idea all around.
I followed an influencer who was renovating a Victorian house who went on s rant about/against black live matter - I blocked her. I was a really cute house but an ugly soul.
You know these issues are complex and there's a lot of breinwashing and manipulation and because of group psychology and propaganda people refuse to debate or understand each others points of views, and then some people just aren't developed or informed enough to express what they feel or why they feel certain ways. It's all designed to divide people, so try not to blame the victims. Nobody is perfect.
This is exactly why companies want to dig into who they sponsor. People will block and boycott based on political disagreement. Not a criticism of you. Most people do it at least somewhat, including myself. The way companies pick and choose influencers isn't only singling out views on the left or on the right. It cuts both ways.
Time to study technology for repair type diy projects, pagers do nothing but convey the messages you'd like, not bad at all and definitely no argument that trendiness prevents it anymore, especially in an era many reminisce Kodak pics
As someone who mucks around with AI a lot, this is a great way to epically fail. Customers will want quantitative measures & atm "it's all made up & the points don't matter"
X will be over before the AI ball gets rolling in this direction (Disney’s lawyers are going to be coming at Elon like rabid honey badgers due to Elon creating “deep fakes” with Disney assets. Elon F…ed around, and now he will Find Out “You don’t mess with the mouse” the hard way)
I would be more concerned this AI being used against RUclipsrs and influencer's that criticise their products or brand's and the targeting them. Disney is already doing this.
What the hell are you talking about? My guess is encouraging people to vote for Kamala, guess what it's time to grow up and understand Trump is 100x worse. Don't be a child "the Democrat is not PERFECT, so I'll let Trump win"
they didn't sell out - but Gaza isn't the sole priority for the domestic audience and Kamala _sounds_ like she might be gooder than expected on some issues a bit slightly maybe #VoteGreen2024 #JillStein2024
*1 of 2. This is how you always need to vote:* We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Republican *and* Democratic Parties- including *Kamala Harris,* AOC, all of the squad, Bernie Sanders, Edward Markey, Mark Pocan, the justice democrats, & all other democrats. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction. For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide. Real progressives will never be Democratic Members or Democratic loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Republican member or loyalist either. If no candidates for a position fit that bill: -Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person; -Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank. This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete. Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge. *2 of 2. This is how you always need to vote:* We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Democratic *and* Republican Parties- including *Trump,* Vivek Ramaswamy, Rand Paul (He’s _no_ Ron Paul), Thomas Massie, Warren Davidson, Ron Johnson, and all other Republicans. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction. For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the same one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide. Real libertarians will never be Republicans or Republican loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Democratic member or loyalist either. If no candidates for a position fit that bill: -Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person; -Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank. This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete. Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge.
You sound very young and idealistic. While your idea may sound good on paper, in practise this would be devastating and literally open the door for the exact OPPOSITE outcome you desire. First, recognize the current divided idealogies of our voting population. The reality is: they are so divided, there is 0% chance of convincing both sides to participate in your plan. The best case scenario for you would be if you managed to convince one of the sides to follow suit. In that case, the votes of that side would become divided between those following your plan, and those continuing to vote for the establishment party of their side. Additionally, amongst those voting with your plan, due to human nature, even this group will not agree unanimously on each candidate in each race at each level of government. Thus, you will have divided the entire voting block of one side into segmented portions, preventing ANY candidates you wish to win to actually win, while also causing the current establishment representatives of this side to LOSE to the side you didn't win over. Let's put this in simpler terms. If you convinced the Left to go along with this, the Right would win landslides at every level of government. You would quite literally grant absolute power to one side in your quest to break down the current structure. And in that case, any chance of fulfilling your goals would be destroyed for GENERATIONS because the consolidated power of the Right would grant them the means to remove the EXISTING checks and balances on their power, and thus ensure their continued dominance for the rest of our lives and likely beyond. Your heart may be in the right place, but advertising this idea as a legitimate method to enact desired change shows your immense naivete to REALITY. Your plan would only succeed in a perfect world in which the human variables and corruptions of power (as well as the corruptions of the DESIRE for power) somehow didn't exist. But they do. One side would take note with glee if this plan of yours took root on a large scale, and the result would be a government made up of the most radical representatives of one side with complete control of everything, because you divided the votes of the people opposed to such. Unfortunately, the current structure of our government and electoral process ensures the dominance of the two major parties. If you want change, the only realistic method is to find members OF one of those two parties whom align the closest to your core beliefs, and to support them. This is not an election to play around with. Nor can we risk throwing away our votes for candidates who have no chance to win, when the other side is threatening the foundations of our nation so deeply. You have no idea the harm this would cause if followed, and to read your arrogant reply to an accurate comment shows your mind is closed to accepting the reality that your idealistic idea is entirely unrealistic. Just because an idea makes logicao sense and seems perfect on paper, does not in any way signifiy its ability to succeed or perform as expected in practise. That is why we have the term "human variable". Logic does not consider the illogical, paradoxial nature of humans, especially not humans around power. Vote for the side your most agree with, or if you need to view it differently in your mind: the side that is least detrimental to your idealogical goals. The current two parties are so starkly polarized and opposite, that there are very, very few people alive of which whom this method could not present a side to choose. Likely, if you are unable to choose between the two, it's because you are not yet firm internally in your own beliefs, even if you don't realize that about yourself.
@@JadusMoltriel You couldn’t be any more incorrect about the strategy here. This is the best solution pragmatically by praxis. Read my comment thoroughly. Carefully. Until you understand it well. You’ll see what I mean. Then teach all others
How is this not money laundering? Trickle down economics math hiding behind a normal supply and demand product? How can they honestly claim their status symbol products were funded by their normal supply and demand business? And this is not called money laundering.
What theyre doing, is called profiling.. and then being selectively biased. It's appearing as discrimination based on 1st amendment rights.. So why is AI and a staffing agencies discriminatory?
![Megan Thee Stallion - Bigger In Texas [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QxTkZTLWdo4/mqdefault.jpg)
Corporations don't want us hurting their pockets as they support Authoritarians.
They look at everything you do whether you are trying to be an influencer or not. Edward Snowden warned us about the data collection. As individuals, we must speak forth rather than remain quiet....
Eddy Snowblower warned us? While he was abusing and selling data.
That's like the child molesters warning people about child molesters:
You know, evangelicals preaching morality to children. Guys in gowns no undies citing scripture to kids is always a red flag.
When your brand "safety" relies on people not taking a stand against hate and bigotry, you're doing it wrong.
Yeah when I see brands engaging in that by going woke, I avoid their products.
Nearly everyone is tired of influencers, brands and politics.
Yup, that's why you're right here on this politics channel ... 🙄
Who is tired of influencers outside the MAGGATS and their Cult.
So basically a Corporate created ai generated American social credit score system for influencers?
I wonder what Winnie the Poo thinks about this
Didn't I see this on an episode of Black Mirror?
I’m pretty sure his response would be “🙄 Typical Americans, getting machines to do the dirty work of people”
Sounds like China’s Skynet technological social credit score.
I continue to hold the opinion I developed in the 70s: Marketing is the most soulless field one can make a career in.
I grew up in a world that told me propagandistic mind control was coming for you and you had to be on your guard. They forgot to mention that Madison Avenue was perfecting it.
"Marketing is the most souless field one can make a career in" 💯💯💯💯
So much for only China having a social credit score 🙄
The only difference is the U.S. (or North America) will cut out the “middle man” of a government agency. I mean outsourcing the private sector to keep tabs on people…you can’t get any more American than _that_ 😞🤦♂️
The problem with using computers is that companies can dodge responsibility. "The computer did it." And you can't sue a computer.
Corporations and institutions being able to automatically scan everything you’ve said online and build a profile on you is scary, actually.
Low key 🤐 silence the people..
you want pre-crime? bc that's how you get pre-crime
Good, need to sort out the rift-raft
Silence favors the oppressor, this is completely a bad thing
As John pointed out, the fact that they gave Simone Biles an A grade after she just posted a red-hot political take means this software is extremely flawed.
Companies either will begin or have already been using AI to search potential hires for anything they dislike and you'll know that's why you didn't get the call back.
Why is it so hard for people on the left to understand that Cancel Culture and Boycotts are two different things? Boycott is when a group or individual says they will avoid a product for themselves. Cancel Culture is when an individual or group says they don't like a product and they don't want anybody to have access to it. Two totally different things.
I'm on the left used to be far left but this identity politics and cancel culture have become toxic. They have literally pushed me centrist because they have become unhinged. Cenk needs to reign in his employees.
@@jbsoileau79 The left used to be the cool party. The 'live and let live' party. I remember when it was the right that wanted to cancel 'Married with Children', and the left said if you don't like it, change the channel. How things have changed.
So are brands going to disclosure where they donate too?
Consumers will still have to roll up their sleeves and do the work themselves on that one (luckily Judd Legum does help with that one)
Brands are terrified of Influencers having an opinion?
So Brands are attempting to disqualify Influencers from work based on an algorithm?
And how does that algorithm differentiate between black, white, single parent, or a large family, were they grew up, etc?
What is the grade for a single white male, a loner, never went to college, very interested in crime and punishment, poor self-esteem, very isolated, insecure and either grew up poor or inherited a bunch of money from their family?
Would love to see grades for:
Musk,
Trump
mass shooters?
Food for Thought..
You are aware that Musk has been losing money from lack of ads since they don't want to post on X as much anymore. He's attempting to sue then over that.
@@gk_zone4274 And his slap suits are successful because the companies he targets like Media Matters don't have the money to fight back.
Best believe many brands will come back if they don't think they can be held accountable.
@gk_zone4274 Meanwhile Disney’s pack of rabid honey badgers aka their lawyers are circling underneath Elon like Jaws 🦈
Well... Everybody KNOWS that Ai is INFALLIBLE.
✋
I swear to God! The lowest COMMON DENOMINATOR.
You guys have a good rapport, makes it fun to see you interact
All greed and no authentic social conscience.
Don't Underestimate The Power Of USERS!...
They'd need to add an "F" category for myself. Because everything is indeed political.
By the way: The WORST department at most companies are the marketing departments. Most are friends of administration family members, pet hires of administration, and overpaid goofballs that waste the budgets on terrible marketing. Disagree?
Behind those terrible TV commercials are the very people I'm referring to.
The holiday decorations in stores etc, assuming that affects sales?
Halloween decorations are up.
I hate Halloween because of the marketing. It used to be fun.
AIPAC using catch words in the comments to get 1st Amendment shut down.
While I'm not supportive of random hate and random hate speech, randomly murdering Palestinians, then randomly shutting down comments by Americans who don't like Genocidal Maniacs like Netanyahu and Putin?
At some point, Americans will realize we actually did fine before the internet if that's what they want. Protests and product boycotts actually work.
So have at it. Meanwhile:
Bee Dee eS
Artificial intelligence is the future of our technocracy and transhumanistic future.
"What do you mean there are only seven channels on RUclips we can advertise on, and between them they only have 800 subscribers?"
So are we just pretending that every computer program is “AI” now?
Companies want to “pander” and are tired of people calling them out on it.
.... except it's not A.I. ... it's a glorified chat bot .. that's like trying to enter a Formula 1 race with a golf cart ........... wow, companies are stupid. You'd think it'd be important to their business models to actually know WTF is going on but as someone who does some work in marketing .. I know that's not a priority for them ...
Cara Watson for the win. Rejected the advertisers/sponsors to speak her mind. #FreePalestine
corporate sponsored content is already bland and boring. What's the problem?
Things always work out better for you guys when I have more money than everyone else
Take back your power, influencers. Choose a month and EVERY ONE OF YOU should talk about your political beliefs. Prove to the corporations that they cannot own your opinions. Organize!!!!!
Influencer pre-roll ads on RUclips are generally trash. However, they are ads, and often by people I don't know or care about, so it is really just about cheap ads and sidelining ad agencies who create real marketing campaigns and creative ads
Brands are that desperate, huh?
Would you rather have some brand executive do a commercial that they say “Buy Brand U, or the puppy gets it” ?
No, Jordan, it doesn't work that way. You think it's okay for AI to filter on YOUR issues, but who gets to decide which issues are allowed or not? What if the people in charge of it think your views are problematic? If they start filtering people at all, then changing the filter is always just a keystroke away. This has to be stopped, period, on the grounds of protecting freedom of speech and the government has to start protecting people's free speech from corporate overreach.
Free Speech isn’t so free
It never was. There is a huge difference between _Free_ Speech and _Consequence Free_ Speech
Another reason to use ad blockers.
You will probably have to stop using Chrome, if that's your preferred web browser
@@bannor99 I've never intentionally used Chrome.
I'm perfectly happy being at the bottom of that list.
Companies want to make money. Remember when Michael Jordan said “conservatives buy shoes too”.
Just keep your mouth shut and sell your product to make maximum profit. Why annoy a large percentage of your customers?
Influencers still have the right to speak their minds. Nobody ever had a right to get a sponsorship deal. People saying this is the same as "social credit" need to get a grip. Influencers deemed "not suitable" for brands to use for advertising are not in danger of being imprisoned or worse.
They just have to find a different way to make money. These are still somewhat famous people who have followers - which is more than most of us regular people have. They'll be fine.
Brands shouldn't be getting involved in politics. Now if only the corporations that own said brands will also stop getting involved by making political donations. What's that I always hear people say? "Get big money out of politics!"
Right On!
Well said.
Why are you conflating someone's free speech with a corporation's monied influence on government officials?
Sounds like corporations want their cake and eat it too. They don’t want their brand representatives to get involved in politics but these brands sure as heck are involved in politics by lobbying congress in their favor. I think companies are just inconvenienced by the fact that consumers are expecting companies to act more socially responsible. Something that Gen X and Boomers only paid lipservice and didn’t really care about
@@YouAreStillNotablaze I'm criticizing companies for being inconsistent - they don't want to be perceived as peddling political influence, which is why they want to stay away from influencers that are "too political". Yet companies do peddle influence with political donations.
IMO companies ought to consistently stay out of politics. No sponsoring political influencers, and also no political donations.
Companies not picking certain influencers for sponsorship deals is not a violation of those influencers' free speech rights.
This is all just about protecting product. This isn’t about consumer safety. This is all about business safety you’ve got a dangerous product or you’ve got a PR company that is putting out false propaganda you are going to limit or stop pushback. This is nothing to do with safety for the consumers or the general public. This is all about the business.
And this is why people hate influencers people don't owe you a damn thing and exposure does not pay the bills
Not Being Controlled through Money.
We can't use our brains to determine this???
Who has time for that? There are millions of influencers and millions of videos/posts. AI makes it easier.
@@steventalik4782 bot
Risk minimisation is NOT a long term advertising strategy, it does nothing to get your message across. As such, this company should be able to milk corporations until they realise they are bogged down. Advertising is going through lots of changes but this one is, well, deeply flawed in the long run. Imho.
Thanks.
Look I’m an advertising art director. You can not expect businesses to risk sales by outspoken representatives of their brand. They are paying them to generate sales not lose them. So this whole conversation being given by people who have no clear understanding of the financial landscape of sales is a bit worthless
This shuts out voices of descent, suppressing opinions that run counter to corporate interests.
This quite literally censors free speech and thought. Now, start looking at this from a different angle. What happens when they decide your opinion needs to be suppressed? Are you still okay with this?
Something tells me you wouldn't be. They'll advertise how they want, that's their right. But there will be consequences to that, including losing sales from potential customers.
It's a terrible idea all around.
I followed an influencer who was renovating a Victorian house who went on s rant about/against black live matter - I blocked her. I was a really cute house but an ugly soul.
You know these issues are complex and there's a lot of breinwashing and manipulation and because of group psychology and propaganda people refuse to debate or understand each others points of views, and then some people just aren't developed or informed enough to express what they feel or why they feel certain ways. It's all designed to divide people, so try not to blame the victims. Nobody is perfect.
This is exactly why companies want to dig into who they sponsor. People will block and boycott based on political disagreement. Not a criticism of you. Most people do it at least somewhat, including myself.
The way companies pick and choose influencers isn't only singling out views on the left or on the right. It cuts both ways.
An alarm goes off when you type in Hasan
I promise you I will receive a F
Censorship. Influences? Lol
Time to study technology for repair type diy projects, pagers do nothing but convey the messages you'd like, not bad at all and definitely no argument that trendiness prevents it anymore, especially in an era many reminisce Kodak pics
Some brands want to take a stand and some want to maximize profit. This is meh, I really don't care if brands want to play it safe or get involved.
Whys that good it means she makes no comments on issues that really matter its actually bad
This is non political. The fact that influencers have any legitimate marketing power is absurd. Thats all.
....using ai to predict if someone will talk about politics? dear god, the waste of money....
Yep..... Not as bad as the power bill for bitcoin mining - but a definite waste.
As someone who mucks around with AI a lot, this is a great way to epically fail.
Customers will want quantitative measures & atm "it's all made up & the points don't matter"
It's basically the end of X
X will be over before the AI ball gets rolling in this direction (Disney’s lawyers are going to be coming at Elon like rabid honey badgers due to Elon creating “deep fakes” with Disney assets. Elon F…ed around, and now he will Find Out “You don’t mess with the mouse” the hard way)
I would be more concerned this AI being used against RUclipsrs and influencer's that criticise their products or brand's and the targeting them. Disney is already doing this.
Sounds like an easy way to make all content boring and the same.
Very barfworthy content. Blech.
This is ridiculous
So he’s saying don’t advertise in TYT?
Why do they need to check this it'll be easier this to have a list of people that don't then do
They only want their money speaking to power not people who don't share their shareholders values.
Wrong. The AI element will give this a much farther reach. It creates a database and people are reduced to the measure of an algorithm.
You are assuming the AI will be correctly programmed. Bad errors have already happened.
Oh!
Captiv∞ sounds not nefarious at all😂
“She can use a win”…wtf??? Who has more wins????
It's sarcasm
Winnie the Poo be jealous
Hope this nonsense ends fast
If an AI can be a better influencer than you, then maybe it's time to get a real job.
Intelligence is not something that requires artificializing.
Learn to live irl, then you will never be punished by the automated gatekeeper of any privilege or dignity whatsoever
They have used these for years
I can’t believe you sold out. I WAS a paid subscriber. I can’t believe I fell for it. I thought you actually cared about Gaza.
What the hell are you talking about? My guess is encouraging people to vote for Kamala, guess what it's time to grow up and understand Trump is 100x worse. Don't be a child "the Democrat is not PERFECT, so I'll let Trump win"
they didn't sell out - but Gaza isn't the sole priority for the domestic audience and Kamala _sounds_ like she might be gooder than expected on some issues a bit slightly maybe
#VoteGreen2024 #JillStein2024
Nope - you are a idiot troll posting garbage for minimum wage.
Go tell massa its too obvious, then ask yourself why support cheaters.
AI Self-censorship
...UBI had better be ready to go soon. Because if it's not, the rich *will* be on the menu.
This is so weird and creepy
*1 of 2. This is how you always need to vote:*
We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Republican *and* Democratic Parties- including *Kamala Harris,* AOC, all of the squad, Bernie Sanders, Edward Markey, Mark Pocan, the justice democrats, & all other democrats. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction.
For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide.
Real progressives will never be Democratic Members or Democratic loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Republican member or loyalist either.
If no candidates for a position fit that bill:
-Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person;
-Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank.
This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete.
Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge.
*2 of 2. This is how you always need to vote:*
We must fully criticize and _always vote_ *against* (& less authoritarian than) both the Democratic *and* Republican Parties- including *Trump,* Vivek Ramaswamy, Rand Paul (He’s _no_ Ron Paul), Thomas Massie, Warren Davidson, Ron Johnson, and all other Republicans. Vote in every single election- at all levels. And also _endorse or anti-endorse,_ in all elections you can, for outside your voting jurisdiction.
For _all_ public positions. And this same strategy applies against the same one or more party-monopolies in _all_ countries worldwide.
Real libertarians will never be Republicans or Republican loyalists. Never vote for _any_ Democratic member or loyalist either.
If no candidates for a position fit that bill:
-Where _write-ins_ are permissible, always write-in an anti-authoritarian person;
-Where write-ins aren’t permissible, always vote uncommitted or leave the ballot blank.
This will continuously reduce the power of _all_ authoritarian parties in the party monopolies: Until our task is complete.
Repeat strategy for all new authoritarian parties that emerge.
translation: throw your vote away
@@tacocanada1888 Read a comment before replying in the future. Don’t make that mistake again
@@user-wl2xl5hm7k take off the tinfoil hat
You sound very young and idealistic. While your idea may sound good on paper, in practise this would be devastating and literally open the door for the exact OPPOSITE outcome you desire. First, recognize the current divided idealogies of our voting population. The reality is: they are so divided, there is 0% chance of convincing both sides to participate in your plan. The best case scenario for you would be if you managed to convince one of the sides to follow suit. In that case, the votes of that side would become divided between those following your plan, and those continuing to vote for the establishment party of their side. Additionally, amongst those voting with your plan, due to human nature, even this group will not agree unanimously on each candidate in each race at each level of government. Thus, you will have divided the entire voting block of one side into segmented portions, preventing ANY candidates you wish to win to actually win, while also causing the current establishment representatives of this side to LOSE to the side you didn't win over.
Let's put this in simpler terms. If you convinced the Left to go along with this, the Right would win landslides at every level of government. You would quite literally grant absolute power to one side in your quest to break down the current structure. And in that case, any chance of fulfilling your goals would be destroyed for GENERATIONS because the consolidated power of the Right would grant them the means to remove the EXISTING checks and balances on their power, and thus ensure their continued dominance for the rest of our lives and likely beyond.
Your heart may be in the right place, but advertising this idea as a legitimate method to enact desired change shows your immense naivete to REALITY. Your plan would only succeed in a perfect world in which the human variables and corruptions of power (as well as the corruptions of the DESIRE for power) somehow didn't exist. But they do. One side would take note with glee if this plan of yours took root on a large scale, and the result would be a government made up of the most radical representatives of one side with complete control of everything, because you divided the votes of the people opposed to such.
Unfortunately, the current structure of our government and electoral process ensures the dominance of the two major parties. If you want change, the only realistic method is to find members OF one of those two parties whom align the closest to your core beliefs, and to support them.
This is not an election to play around with. Nor can we risk throwing away our votes for candidates who have no chance to win, when the other side is threatening the foundations of our nation so deeply. You have no idea the harm this would cause if followed, and to read your arrogant reply to an accurate comment shows your mind is closed to accepting the reality that your idealistic idea is entirely unrealistic. Just because an idea makes logicao sense and seems perfect on paper, does not in any way signifiy its ability to succeed or perform as expected in practise. That is why we have the term "human variable". Logic does not consider the illogical, paradoxial nature of humans, especially not humans around power.
Vote for the side your most agree with, or if you need to view it differently in your mind: the side that is least detrimental to your idealogical goals. The current two parties are so starkly polarized and opposite, that there are very, very few people alive of which whom this method could not present a side to choose. Likely, if you are unable to choose between the two, it's because you are not yet firm internally in your own beliefs, even if you don't realize that about yourself.
@@JadusMoltriel You couldn’t be any more incorrect about the strategy here. This is the best solution pragmatically by praxis.
Read my comment thoroughly. Carefully. Until you understand it well. You’ll see what I mean.
Then teach all others
US ai regulation due,EU signed in to law
Yeah Europe at least tries to be 3 steps ahead of the curve
As time goes on our freedoms are going away F AI
All of you. I can skip your video and get the same topics of conversation. You just won't get the revenue.
Viva la get the money
Just a PRE THOUGHT POLICE
So how is this not discriminatory against someone’s freedom of speech?
How is this not money laundering? Trickle down economics math hiding behind a normal supply and demand product?
How can they honestly claim their status symbol products were funded by their normal supply and demand business? And this is not called money laundering.
What theyre doing, is called profiling..
and then being selectively biased.
It's appearing as discrimination based on 1st amendment rights..
So why is AI and a staffing agencies discriminatory?
The pronunciation is not ‘Spyro’ it is ‘Spearo’ … please respect cultural snd ethnical pronunciations… the world is not the US… thank goodness!!!
Did they teach you the word "ethnical" where you're from?
@@BonerinSweatpants-ex7ne🤣🤣🤣
So dumb. Steph Curry was very apolitical before Trump. Even he had to start speaking up. Same with Lebron.
I wonder if me and she posted a four palmer video my wedding tackle would be perceived as a weapon by AI 🤔
🫲
🫲
🫲
🫲
Internet personality
🌊
Jordan- What?
Me- ROFL
💙🌊🌊🔵
Who says Big Brother is fearmongering. They're making money off it.
When you work for a company, they dictate the terms of your employment and acceptable behavior. Don't like it, don't work for them....easy peasy!
AI is dangerous
And helpful
Can't blame them, the country is divided that it's hard for any brand to succeed by pissing off half the country.
I thought influencers were 30 year old women dressing as pedobait
Might just be what you're interested in. The algo tends to show you things you like.