Research the difference between an ICE vehicle and an EV (a recent study) and it is clear you are way more likely to have a fire with an ICE vehicle than an EV. So this at best, is very, very misleading.
This sounds more like an advertisement for the fire blankets, which saved the day in multiple cases. So... we developed new tech, EV's, and found out they burn differently (and less frequently), so we built new ways to handle those fires. What's the issue? Sounds like the regular progression of technology. It's like we stopped having to worry about the horses knocking over the lanterns in the barns, and catching the barns on fire, because we replaced them with electric lights. Oh, no, a fire in the barn now means that electricity could kill someone mixed with water via electrocution! We should go back to horses and buggies! NO. We figured out you should kill the power to a burning structure, now the water isn't a risk of electrocution. Bingo! Same with EV's. Many times safer to drive, much less likely to catch fire, and we are developing the tools to handle the "what-if's".
@@Imagineering100 Plenty of scientific studies disagree with your off the cuff banter. I don't understand how people like you function being so closed minded.
Research the difference between an ICE vehicle and an EV (a recent study) and it is clear you are way more likely to have a fire with an ICE vehicle than an EV. So this at best, is very, very misleading.
This sounds more like an advertisement for the fire blankets, which saved the day in multiple cases. So... we developed new tech, EV's, and found out they burn differently (and less frequently), so we built new ways to handle those fires. What's the issue? Sounds like the regular progression of technology.
It's like we stopped having to worry about the horses knocking over the lanterns in the barns, and catching the barns on fire, because we replaced them with electric lights. Oh, no, a fire in the barn now means that electricity could kill someone mixed with water via electrocution! We should go back to horses and buggies! NO. We figured out you should kill the power to a burning structure, now the water isn't a risk of electrocution. Bingo!
Same with EV's. Many times safer to drive, much less likely to catch fire, and we are developing the tools to handle the "what-if's".
AI generated crap.
Not really.
You omitted statistics in your report.
There are none, that is why.
And the statistics/facts/data supporting more than anomalies are found where beyond your imagination where exactly?
They are not good for the environment.
They're better than ICE for the environment though.
@@steveyoung9687 No they are not no way.
@@Imagineering100 Provide the data supporting your otherwise empty assertion.
@@Imagineering100 Plenty of scientific studies disagree with your off the cuff banter. I don't understand how people like you function being so closed minded.
@@steveyoung9687 They are not good for the environment.
I'm wondering why it's taken this.Long for people to realize this.
Because this is a bunch of bullshit.