Great video. But I think you should add words displayed on the screen ao that the watcher is more able to keep up with the information. Keep up the good work 👍
You said the range of the 787-9 is 7,530 miles - this is completely wrong - you clearly meant nautical miles, not miles, but there's a big difference between the two. The 787-9 has a range of 8,710 miles, although Qantas fly it 9,010 miles on their Perth to London route with a reduced payload. Also, another notable reason why the 787-8 has fallen out of favour compared to the larger variants, is its lack of hybrid laminar flow technology in the vertical stabiliser, which the -9 and -10 have to minimise turbulent flow and improve efficiency.
Great video.
But I think you should add words displayed on the screen ao that the watcher is more able to keep up with the information.
Keep up the good work 👍
airbus > boeing
You said the range of the 787-9 is 7,530 miles - this is completely wrong - you clearly meant nautical miles, not miles, but there's a big difference between the two. The 787-9 has a range of 8,710 miles, although Qantas fly it 9,010 miles on their Perth to London route with a reduced payload.
Also, another notable reason why the 787-8 has fallen out of favour compared to the larger variants, is its lack of hybrid laminar flow technology in the vertical stabiliser, which the -9 and -10 have to minimise turbulent flow and improve efficiency.
I think because of there's a problem with BOEING 787 that something weird.
dead internet theory
What really @Aviaat1 ?