Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Was Akbar Really Great? Or Is It Just Propaganda? | Keerthi History
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июл 2023
- Akbar is often referred to as one of the most successful Mughal ruler. That's true. But is he really deserving to be called 'The Great'? Let's see in this video.
Follow Me On Other Social Media Platforms
Facebook: / keerthistory
Instagram: / keerthihistory
Twitter: / keerthihistory
Support Me As A Patreon : / keerthihistory
About Me :
I am a passionate History Graduate with a deep love for uncovering the forgotten stories of India. With a keen eye for detail and a relentless drive to uncover the truth, I have dedicated my life to exploring the rich and complex history of country, shedding light on the forgotten aspects of India's past. Through my tireless research and dedication to the craft, I am committed to ensuring that the legacy of India's rich cultural heritage will never be forgotten!
Our history books have been written by people suffering from stockholm syndrome.
Damn!!! I’m gonna pin this😅
Their conscience is mortgaged to The West
*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar*
*He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*
*Millions of salutations to our Hindu Warrior Veerangana Keerthi ji🚩* , who raised the flag of Hindu🚩 with the Power of her Bhakti in the Crowd of Billions. She is working 24/7 so hard to awaken, Enlighten, Open the Eyes, Tell the Truth, Facts, Reality to Siklar Sleeping Hindus🚩 *Jai Hindutva🚩Jai Hindu Rashtra 🚩Jai Jai Sri Ram🕉️🚩🚩*
@@KeerthihistoryWe Hindus Love alot Keerthi🙏U r the Gem of our Hindu Community
U r true follower of Dharma, Satya🚩
Bhagwan bless you alot and give you more Strength🙏🕉️
Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️
hello...I'm a student studying in 8th grade. When I was writing my final exam for social, we had a question "Why is Akbar called Akbar the great? Justify your statment". What I was expected to quite is exactly what was given in our classwork or textbook. But instead, I gave an answer very similar to what you have said in this video. For saying that he is not worthy of that title, I didn't get marks for that particular question.
I asked my teacher why, and she scoled me. Unforyunately this is the reality of our present day schools.
u did a great job well done👍
I’m sorry you had to go through that! But education institutions are like that. They have a standard answer… unfortunately we gotta write what they want us to write to get marks.
Hats off to you🔥🕉️🚩🚩
U r True Hindu,True Follower of Hindu Dharma🕉️🚩
Bhagwan will send people like you only to svargaloka🙏The Ones who always stand with Dharma, Truth🕉️
Bhagwan bless you alot🙏Jai Sri Ram Hari Hara🙏🕉️
You are the best
*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭*
And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country"
*In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭*
This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"
If Akbar was not great so,why Ashoka was great he killed all of his brother's except one - In his young age Ashoka liked to tortured their civilians that's why they called him chanda ashoka,He destroyed kallinga why He is called great ????from north-east India.....😅😅Ans plz:-
Your Channel Enriched me a lot. Till now only Northern India was raising their voice for our Hindu Dharma. Now Southern part of India is also raising it's voice through Hindus like you.
Much respect from Karnataka,Jai Sri Ram
Being kannadiga, I think people of Bollywood are son of bitches to glorify the mughuls. I truly respect rajputs valor and bravery and I also urge every Indian to become yoddha to protect our sanatan dharm and culture..Jai hind Jai Shri Ram, Jai Hanuman 🙏🙏
We know invaders story more than our own emperor.... This is the saddest thing about our knowledge... People like you are informing us with our real "the real" HISTORY... Respect for you Keerthi ❤❤
😇❤️🙏🏼
*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭*
And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country"
*In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭*
This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"
Islam = Adharma
Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55
*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*
Benefit of jizya(protection tax) :
1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war.
2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land.
3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion.
4. Muslims will protect his property.
5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya)
6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war.
7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.]
8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it.
9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection.
10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims.
And more and more
We learnt wrong history in schools. At least for this generation kids history needs to be corrected in each state books. Thanks a lot for your dedication and hard work for a better tomorrow, for a better India. Jai Hind
Fake history made up by Nehru and his Taliban education minister Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad!
*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar*
*He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*
*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭*
And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country"
*In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭*
This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"
Islam = Adharma
Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55
*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*
There is a humble request for all. Please try to understand that, if a person is Hundu or Muslim it doesn't matter, the matter depends on the heart and what they gave to the world. Akbar gave good as well as bad. It doesn't mean he is supreme due to his good doing and not the devil due to his bad doing. And primarily it's about a person ( a single living human being), not the religion. So there is nothing to do with Hindus and Muslims. Don't make it a religious issue. Meanwhile, Keerthi it's great, what you are doing. Even in UPSC PREPARATION, the mentor won't teach too deeply. Keep going. Great job. Love it and learn it a lot. Thanks from my whole heart.
Sorry, if I unintentionally hurt anyone from above written.
He doesn't deserve to be great..
But he is definitely the best out of the worst..🙌🏻
True lines Mam..It just hits hard🤞🏻❤
I would say he is one of the decent one out of the worst. Akbar and best are not appropriate in the same sentence
@@ardashirshah7786 do you really think that sati and massacre are the same thing or of equal magnitude? Slavery is prevalent even today in one form or another
@@omsachdevyes i think both are same.
@@omsachdev1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead is Lord Vishnu
Worst part is we are taught more about Babur’s lineage in our history books, than we are taught about Mauryas or Bhosales... and that is scary... I keep recommending your videos to my friends with school-going kids... hopefully it’ll help teach them OUR real history better
I am from ICSE board and we had two big chapters about the Mauryas in our book.
@@anulagnabasu9854 I’m glad to hear it... I passed in 2001 from SSC board, and all we had was two paragraphs about Shivaji Maharaj in our history books... which by the way covered everything Mughal thoroughly
@@KamatShivanishivaji is a king. Mughals is a dynasty lasted for centuries. How many pages we can write for his 15 years rule.
@@KamatShivanithuglaks, kilgis, mughals.... Is a 1200 years history. How many centuries did shivaji kingdom lasted?
@@sugunbtwjdude cholas rules for 1000 years, ahom ruled for 800 plus years, vijayanagar Empire was there for almost 1000 years.. how many lineages u know? We all taught of lineage of so called great Mughals for babar to Aurangabad but doesn't even know 2-3lineage of one Empire... Don't be so blind to argue that the invdrs were not glorified in our history books🤦🤦🤦
*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*
True... We should learn from them.. itself shows how they loved our culture
No, it's a fallacy called survivorship bias.
@@satishbhanse7454Yes😭They sacrificed their lives for our Religion🕉️
We(Current Hindus) are not even 1% as Hindu as them😭
Who exactly were Adharma spreaders?
@@anulagnabasu9854Muslims☪️
Why didn't other Great Hindu kings never tried to learn about other religions like Akbar did...
Don't delete this comment.
Pandit Nehru was the worst PM of Bharat, because he himself was not Bhartiya, he was muslim. Nehru has written Shivaji Maharaj was decoit.this is what his knowledge was. I don't count him as PM.
Tere maine she unko Kiya farak pardta hai 😂 it's like scientist removing Pluto from the planet list lol 🤡 like Pluto even care about them
@@shikharyadav9637 why will pluto care duh?...its not a living be-..
The same holds True for Ashoka the Great. He is portrayed as a monk after he converted to Buddhism. Truth is he killed 1000s in Ajivakam religion after turning into Buddhism. Every the Great has the worst side in them, be it Gandhi to now Modi
All kings will do this sir.. but the point is If she talks about all such kings from Shivaji, dhananandh to European kings and Arabic origin kings ... it would be much better... Learning pros and cons of all kings in history is important ..not only the cons done by foreign invaded kings
Absolutely!
Lol 😂 ashoka was Buddhist before killing anyone. Know the real history stop justifying one action of horror with another
@@aranimallick1804lol your islamic ppl are danger to humanity
Dude it's already mentioned in 6th standard text books. He converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war.
0:38 Should we be more critical about it just because he was an invader? Or is it because he is a human being like everyone else and is bound to have faults? Shouldn't history be critical and unbiased not depending on whether the person is an invader or not?
6:48 You earlier made a video about Dara Shikoh. In it you mentioned Majma ul Bahrain right? In that book Dara Shikoh states that the basis of hinduism is actually monotheism and he refers to the Rig Veda as his source. Also, Baba Lal Bairagi states this. The Brahmo Samaj is based on monotheism as well. Dara Shikoh compares Hiranyagarbha with Allah. Maybe, the same case has taken place here.
5:44 I have read somewhere that Mirza Aziz Kokaltash had joined Din-i-ilahi after he faced discrimination in Mecca. I can be wrong about this.
8:29 He plundered cities that he conquered right? Many rulers of Ancient India had followed the policy of conquest and expansion. Invader or not, he was the emperor of India, right? Where would the plundered wealth go except India?
He was not perfect and of course, not a holy saint. He was a ruler, a politician. He was born and supposed to be one. Sometimes moral values and politics don't go together. Now, has this got anything to do with him being an invader?
I think many people here and she herslef, have made up their minds by looking at Akbars birth religion, it does not matter how different his kingship was from Islamic or even Timurid models or how much his actions are similar to other Indians kings that these may hold dearly. Their opinions of him are made up due to Akbars birth religion.
@@battlerushiromiya651Maybe or maybe not. But what do you think about the second point of my comment? Can you please tell me? I am actually a child. I study in class 8.
@@anulagnabasu9854 I am not really familiar with Dara Shikoh. You can read about Dara Shikoh in 'Dara Shikoh:Life and works' by Bikram Jit Hasrat
@@battlerushiromiya651Thank you 😊
I am from West Bengal. I love the way you present the true history to us.
Benefit of jizya(protection tax) :
1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war.
2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land.
3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion.
4. Muslims will protect his property.
5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya)
6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war.
7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.]
8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it.
9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection.
10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims.
And more and more
@@LionsHeart3.1.3So basically non muslims has to pay taxes for their basic rights. Bs.
@@Chad_White_abc muslims too have to give taxes. why are you playing victim card?😂
I love how every hindu nationalist things that hindu rulers are good and all non Hindu/islamic ruler are bad
I wish history was this simple
Yeah this is what andhbhakti is like
One of the rare rational comments.
But when you look at Gaza, you guys clearly knew who are good and who are bad. Then history was so simple?
@@Chad_White_abc Yes Israelis are bad and carrying out their cruel deeds in the name of security. They are not fighting but killing innocents. History is this much complicated. Once victims are now showing that they a
were anything but a victim.
FYI:I don't need your opinion though cause it would be biased in favor of Israel for no reason.
Finnaly
Damn, these videos are eye openers. Shame on every who calls these invaders great!
Great work ma'am!
Thank you 😇❤️🙏🏼
@@KeerthihistoryI really got bemused where from u assess this kind of political views on historical aspects.
1. Muslim marriages were never been any ceremony. Unlike Hindu marriage, which is considered to be building a Caste - Gotra relationship between two families -- there by they conduct lots of pre nuptial rituals like feuneral of ancestors -- Tarpana, Shraddha, then Pooja of the clan deity , Pooja of land ( vastu), Pooja of main Hindu gods -- Lord Vishnu etc etc -- so it had been elaborate customs -- Muslim marriages are just contract between 2 person -- a legal formality only.
All the extravaganza that we observe now a days around a Muslim marriage, had actually rooted to the family's caste/ clan roots , infact often being severely criticised by ulemas as anti - Islamic.
So it was quite obvious that none of Akbar's marriages ( even with Turk or Ujbek ladies) too were never ceremony or worthy of being mentioned.
2. In those age , accessibility to imperial Harem for any man other than emperor himself was practically impossible and a capital punishment for the violator. Hence the emperor's concubines were always been very very private.
Turks and Timurids have strict customs to entirely separate their ladies from any public & state affairs or interference.
So it was obvious the empress ( Malika - e - Hindustan) was just a honorary title to get all the best privileges within Harem -- like best of foods, ornaments, slaves and maids, best of the chembers, medicines , health care etc. But beyond that they were sanned from any state affair.
Hence the courtiers could not write about her. In fact if they would shown any interest about the empress , they would have put their own lives into dangers.
This customs was not exclusive to Turks or Timurids. Even for Hindu king's concubines too used to be put under equal restrictions in those days.
It was completely unfair to expect an mediaeval empire to behave like a modern day's liberal woke guy.
@@subhadeepmandal2221❤
@@subhadeepmandal2221You are suffering from Hinduph0bia and Muslimania, Ji ha di sm.
Visit a good doctor
@@subhadeepmandal2221No matter how hard you try, u can't change the Truth.
Now cry hard ji ha di
*Billions Salutations to Keerthi For spreading Reality of Akbar*
*He is not Akbar the Great, He is Akbar the Adharma😡😡*
Akbar the terrible?
@@agniswar3Yes ofc.
Akbar the evil, the Asura, The Monster, The Rakshas
How many wife rana pratap had just answer the question?? 11
@@rahu12767having multiple wives isn’t a crime he didn’t marry to satisfy his lust like Akbar who had unnecessary 500 wives instead he married 11 woman to have multiple children and heirs because he was already fighting with Akbar if he died there would be no one to save Rajputs from Akbar that’s why
@@TypicalIndian1981 marriage for satisfy sex or not
I am a non-Indian muslim and I had read a little bit about Akbar. Like his made-up religion of din-e-ilahi. I honestly thought that this religion was just a mix of Islam and Hinduism in scriptures. However, I did not know this much details about his murder of 30,000 innocent civilians. This video has opened my eyes. Thank you
Yes after the war of Chittor, he ordered the killing of 30k innocent common people living in that Fort city.
Every ruler did acts like that. How do you think an empire was established without killing civilians
You never agree Akbar the Great Because you will not construct tall statue to Gandhi
History means as it is.. you are a true historian
😇❤️🙏🏼
😂😂
Christians (and few Muslims) are spending a lot of effort in converting Hindus n natives of India in even TODAY'S times!! This needs to STOP. Keerthi you should consider talking about this issue ...
This is the good time that she should change her channel name from Keerthi history to Keerthi propagandist as her history is no more history rather religious menifesto to defame other religion or it's rulers
Thank You For Telling Us Reality About "Akbar The Great"
Akbar was a mleccha . Don’t you see mleccha mixed kids who are product of Mughals , making fun of South Indian, why because we are brown. So ignore them
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
Madam. Tell me the Manipur history please.. PM is still missing.. Why US and France visit. Tell that history also.
Few fools don't want a Muslim to be great, secular, mary a hindu..... You can cry all your life..... Sadly no use....
in historical facts which has "no" mention of Jodha bai at all. Yes, there is no trace of Akbar's favorite wife or loved one - Neither in ancient...
While we may eulogize for their love-saga through this fictional dramas, the actual truth lies in historical facts which has "no" mention of Jodha...If at all there is any claim of his favorite wife then it is Empress Ruqaiya Sultan Begum, a cousin whom he married at the age of 15.We have been taught that Akbar was a great Mughal Emperor but in reality as per written in the historical books it is totally opposite.
It seems all we learnt in history is wrong, even in movies also they portrayed very great about Akbar, thanks to you dear Keerthi for bringing out this video😊😊 😊😊😊❤❤
She proved nothing though, none of these actions are even remotely different from what even Indian kings who she looks upto did. We dont know much about their wives, many of them also tried to glorify their own GOds and frankly all of them used harsh violence against their enemies. She is reaching.
Benefit of jizya(protection tax) :
1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war.
2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land.
3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion.
4. Muslims will protect his property.
5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya)
6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war.
7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.]
8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it.
9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection.
10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims.
And more and more
@@LionsHeart3.1.3imagine you have to pay jizya to aurungzeb that he will be using against marathas . I don't think anyone will be willing to finance their own destruction .
@@hriday1341
How is saving India by slaying parathas a bad thing? Every proud Indian would support Mughals becaus ethey destroyed parataha culture, sathi prata, r@pe culture etc. Cope hard guvarputtars anti-indians😂
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
Very well researched...good to see next generation is taking interest in what actually must have happened rather than believing everything showed to them ..keep it up❤
Benefit of jizya(protection tax) :
1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war.
2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land.
3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion.
4. Muslims will protect his property.
5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya)
6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war.
7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.]
8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it.
9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection.
10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims.
And more and more
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
@@LionsHeart3.1.3 Don't justify Jizya, I'm a muslim too but, Jizya is pure bad, and all these conditions were not met even after receiving the tax, and also even after abolition these conditions were fulfilled.
@@RedRebel008 Madarchud Don't talk about what u don't know. Stop sucking liber@l d!cks. Jizya is justified 100%. U pay tax to hindutva govt and u Won't question their corruption but when Islam says ur tax will be used to protect u and would be returned if we Don't protect u. How is that bad? And by saying Jizya is bad u have becomea definite kafir. Because law of Allah can't be and never be wrong and by saying law of Allah is bad u have become kafir.
You need not try too much that he is not great..... Tell about other king that how he is great when compared to Akbar.
I am glad there are still some people in your audience who do not believe everything blindly.
Stop spreading hate.
After watching the video "My Mother Came Upon," I can proudly say that I sat through the entire duration. Despite my mother's limited understanding of English, primarily being a Punjabi speaker, she also dedicated her time to watch it. However, due to the accent utilized in the video, she encountered difficulties in comprehending the content. Consequently, I took it upon myself to narrate the entire video to her, and we both derived immense enjoyment from the experience!👍😌
Benefit of jizya(protection tax) :
1. Jizya payers won't be forced to participate in war or be needed to join the war.
2. He can live with his family peacefully in the land.
3. Muslim's will establish his and his families right to practice own religion.
4. Muslims will protect his property.
5. No need to pay zakat tax that is paid by muslims as charity.(Zakat can be > Jizya)
6. Muslims will protect jizya payers, with even own life on the line durning war.
7. He can follow laws of own religion unless it's extrimism. [ like burning wife alive with dead husband . or burying of daughter alive. etc.]
8. Woman, children, old man and woman, poor man and woman. Don't need to pay jizya and can live without paying it.
9. Kafirs who accepted to pay jizya without war, their temples/mandirs /churches etc. will be under muslim protection.
10. No need to pay defense tax that is paid by muslims.
And more and more
Due to such serials and movies people forgot about his dark side 😑. They believed that he was the geart empiror. I hope they will realise the reality from this video. Great job didi 🥰👍
😇❤️🙏🏼
*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭*
And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country"
*In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭*
This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"
Islam = Adharma
Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55
If you think this is bad, most Indian kings have also done the same things as Akbar had. The invasion of Cholas to Sri Lanka also led to violence against civilians, even the Marathas are remembered in bengal for the pluinder their mercenaries did.
Moreover than that, Indian kings have always glorified their own Gods, with the help of the priestly caste, nothing new here.
if you think these things dont make Great, then neither are most Indian kings.
@@JaiSriRam119டேய் சங்கி..பயலே ...தமிழன்டா❤
The way you portray everything in the guise of secularism and very carefully promote Hinduism proves that Akbar was far more straightforward and secular than you ever will be.
"First muslim ruler who married a hindu princess "???? Are you aware of the marriage between Khizr Khan( Alauddin Khilji's son) and Deval Rani( Princess of Gujarat) mentioned in Amir Khusrau' work. This happened over 200 years before Babur even invaded India. Get your facts right, woman if you're that passionate about history.
L@du vo rajput nhi thi 🤣 she was from Gujarat
Very nice explanation...thanks to gomootra cola university 😂😂😂
he is not unedcuated like you
Converted spotted😅
Akbar married so many women, so he is bad at administration, hence he is a bad ruler.... What logic yaar ? 😅
@1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
@1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved. This is common, as widow remarriage is encouraged in their culture, that is, how men having 4 wives came into picture, because there were too many widdows at that time. But today's many misguided muslims take advantage of this.
@2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
@3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
@3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulamas that Akbar later on removed.
@3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
@4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
@5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
@7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
Every person has a good and bad side. Each person is a mixture of good and bad. Ashoka the great was also like that. He was the reason for the deaths of so many people but he embraced Buddhism and preached peace.
Akbar's story is similar.
Every great man has a legacy, but every great man has a story.
Akbar was a great, liberal ruler. He wasn't perfect. He made mistakes.
Being great doesn't make you keen to not make mistakes.
Also, please mention the sources from where you are bringing all this information.
It could also be heresy.
Your research and everything is fine. But where are you getting all these points in most of your videos that always supports Hinduism and opposes Islam. Like every single video in which religion is involved and there's no secularistic point of view, even though you would have studied in your history book as "India is a secular country". In your every video, you support only Hinduism and indirectly oppose Congress leaders, non Hindu leaders or rulers. And just because majority of our population is Hindu, they also believe whatever you say without knowing your intention. Think on your own guys. What she says is just a perspective. Hinduism or Islam is just a religion. This will bring hatred towards other religions.
Let me find you the secular book, upon which the major world terror outfits are based:
Qu'ran 47:4 “So when you meet those who disbelieve in Allah, strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.”
It's not secularism...what you want is escapism😂😂😂 go to some other channel for that, you won't get it on a history channel which is talking about facts... Not self concocted lies and fantasies..if you can't handle the fact that hindus were killed by muslims rulers then it is your fault.
Politically motivated historians teach you and preach you so that you can vote one party😂
Converted chal nikal
@@maheshprasad4334Alhamdulillah they are converted from the filth you pagans are indulged in.
No.
Akbar was not great.
It was his propaganda .
Akbar always new that if Rajput were with him,It's safe for Mughal.
Hindu kings fought with each other and broke their idols and opponent temples to show his superiority. They married their daughters to Mughals for friendship and army alliances. They never worship one God but different deities as per their regions. They never fought for Hinduism or India , they just wanted to rule just like the Mughals wanted to expand their territories. The Mughals never intended to spread Islam or Shariah.
Your attempt to glorify the Hindu kings through false statements is not correct. The king Akber was secular and not very Islamic. He had hindu wives and ministers. Please show me the history before the arrival of Mughals or Arabs. The Hindu kings were more brutal and violent than them.
6:50 Considering you as true history reseachers, you should already know the Hinduism evoled from a religion now we called vedantic religion where there is mention of one god but slowly it transformed polytheism
Damn, I did not know that, I'm gonna steal this, and BTW if she was a historian don't you think she'd be challenging the current theories instead of making youtube videos, she herself doesn't believe what she says.
If Akbar is still alive would you ever dare to speak all this ?
Well, we live in a democracy now. Not an autocracy.
If, hypothetically he comes back to life today, *he would be a commoner. Who is penniless.*
So yeah. Hope you understood.
Being a muslim I can say rajput and mughal women drew him crazy so he was not a true muslim or not a true hindu
The reason why Akbar was called "Akbar the Great" could be simply explained by the fact that after the intense violence of Babar (who overthrew the Lodi dynasty with intense battles), and the extreme instability under Humayun (he lost his kingdom and had to fight with his Persian allies to gain his kingdom back). After these two periods of violence and instability, when a stable ruler who was less brutal than them came along, of course people are going to refer him as "great".
Also, about the "governors not being so secular" part, here's the thing. It was the 1500s, and instant messaging like WhatsApp and Telegram were nonexistent, and the only way messages could reach the center of power (Akbar) was through a guy riding on horseback or other slow systems. These messages could easily be controlled or blocked by the local governors of the area, and Akbar would never realize that his orders were being violated, and as long as the local governor paid up his tribute and didn't rebel against Akbar, he wouldn't march against them. So it could have been possible that Akbar never realized that he had kept such cruel people as governors of his provinces.
Another example is the edict by Aurangzeb, where he ordered the destruction of the Puri Jagannath Temple in Puri. However, the local governor realized that doing such an act would provoke an open revolution, and thus, simply locked up the temple, with the temple being opened only after the death of Aurangzeb and the reversal of his doctrines by his successor. Aurangzeb never realized that his order was explicitly violated, simply because there was no way of checking.
I wouldn't call Akbar the greatest monarch of all time, but I wouldn't call him a "barbarian monarch" as WhatsApp groups have portrayed him to be. To analyze the monarchs of the 16th century, we cannot use the morals and ideals of the 21st century, we have to adopt a more nuanced approach.
I can't imagine how much effort you put into thie detailed research. Man, how I wish I could live with you to listen so many historical things and intake knowledge. Thanks for this video!
Trust me, I talk history to none of my family members!
@@Keerthihistory Oh man.... I thought you must be. As I keep talking with my family members 😀
@@Keerthihistoryi know they are not interested in your lecture 😂 joking and the fact about akbar is right may be 'the great' title dosent deserve him but he was one the greatest king in mughals and Muslims if that era ashoka was also selfish before kalinga war every king is a invaders until his intentions and action don't harm peoples in the kingdom....
@@Keerthihistorymake some videos in dark side of Ashoke , Prithviraj chuhan , shiva ji how he stopped the hajj pilgrims , yup u cant make and have no dare to make videos on this coz u too know u will loose all your WhatsApp university followers, well be happy ,create whatever u want to create 😂🥱, Savidhan me tou Akber the great aj b hai or hamesha rahega 🥱🔥😎
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
KEERTHI, YOU ROCK. SO ARTICULATED EXPLANATION. SO SIMPLE & LUCID. YOU GIVE THIS GENERATION, A CHANCE TO PUT THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE, RATHER THAN ROTE THE EXTRACTS HANDED DOWN GENERATIONS.
Akbar = wolf in sheeps costume
When we read medieval Indian history, we are told by historians that Akbar, who established the grand Mughal Empire in India, was a great ruler. He is given the nickname 'the Great' by these ‘eminent’ historians. According to them, he was the greatest among all the Mughal emperors. He had a great personality, his political and military feats were unmatched. The religious policy of the kingdom he adopted towards people of other faiths, especially Hindus, was liberal, accommodative and tolerant, thus qualifying him to be called ‘the Great’.
According to historians, Akbar is ‘great’ with many achievements, like unbeaten military campaigns, establishing and consolidating the Mughal rule in the Indian subcontinent with its historical extent and spread, the relative prosperity of his rule, and establishing administrative measures, which were copied down to the 19th century, etc. His personality was great, as he had many virtues. Although he was a Muslim, his empire was never Islamic. He married many Hindu princesses and was a very tolerant person. The epithet 'great' is also bestowed upon Akbar on the basis of his tolerant, secular, and liberal state policy. So, he is the perfect example of the national king
It's about the word "great" which for some reason britain also call themselves . And also the fact that mughal empire and today's Israel is much more similar , It would not be wrong that they are the best place for minorities even the Muslims to live in the entire Middle East as they are pretty much secular and democratic but they are hostile towards non citizens who don't live there and are also good militarily . Now can they be called good or bad ? Occupiers or reformers of land ?
This seems to be an unbiased analysis. Well done.
😇❤️🙏🏼
@@Keerthihistory read little bit and do full study in your so many vedios many facts are not accurate if teaching history teach in a better way not like WhatsApp University
@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017 from Rahul Gandhi National University of Propaganda
@@KeerthihistoryPlz waiting for the negative side of Modi ji
🎉😊
Plz reply to my comments to as u reply to ur aganda comments
Am waiting
For both
@@choudhurycompetitivehub1017yes exactly said . Keethi mostly comes with biased opinions about history ..keerthi dnt be prejudiced while explaining the history , you are pushing and dividing the communities to chasm. Whatever the centuries old history does not do any good to the current civilization. You must keep yourself from explaining the history in such a way that instigates the communities ...
Thank you for lighting on Akbar's dark side 🙏🙏
😇❤️🙏🏼
*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*
No Rajput supported other Rajput.... Why don't you highlight the no unity of Rajput kings.....
Akbar was not secular he was just pretending to be a secular again he was just a muslim trying to justify his own deeds,he didnt marry those rajput womens he just took them as wives or simply a victory trophy
Thanks for giving everyone a new way to think about history and to make it interesting for everyone
And pls make a video on kittur rani chennamma
On it already!!!
@@Keerthihistory thanks for your reply
The essence of upanishads is not polytheism. It is actually oneness. In fact , the main essence of it is "aham brahmasmi" , that one individual can realize Brahman , the universal consciousness. In that aspect, what Akbar was trying to do is not too much different from the text. Although, the ego is the one driving that which is completely against the upanishads.
Bro, most Hindu kings also created texts with the help of priestly caste to furhter their own dominance, Akbar is not alone in this regard at all. Are you ready to judge them as well?
Its not hard to see why contradiction exists in his reign. You see, he himself appears like a secular person, but lets the blame fall on his ministers to appear clean himself.
Akbar is "great" because his comparison is with other mughal rulers.
You are really destroying India's secularism and diversity.
No one is perfect, they had their own qualities and weakness. But you are so biased and only highlighting their negative sides. ☹️☹️☹️😡☹️☹️☹️
Why can't you accept the diversities as a part of history?
Can you accept this verse from a so-called “Holy Book” ?
Qu'ran 47:4 “So when you meet those who disbelieve in Allah, strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds.”
Akbar atleast took time to know about other religions.
There are so many hindu kings who never did that... Aren't he better than that....
You kidding??? So according to you, if an Indian king kills people he is hindu, if he Doesn't, then he must be from another religion... Amazing😂😂😂
Ur points are valid but i dnt think u pointing him as invader.. He might be a foreigner bt he didnt loot all the wealth and went back.. Instead he destroyed as well as contributed to india and its glory
He was misinforming our Vedas and why are you saying no problem with that.If the same thing happens with Quran,will the Muslim brothers accept it?Dude this is crime if we are thinking he’s great.
Request for Indian brothers please save your culture,religion at any cost.
thank you for telling our true history without any bias ❤️
I have been following you so long and I wish to say this, you've improved your English considerably ❤️
😇❤️🙏🏼
*Justice for 1990 Hindus in Kashmir, 2002 Sabarmati, 2003 Nandimarg, Girija Tickoo, Nikita Tomar, Kanhaiyalal, Harsha etc😭😭*
And Iam talking about things that this Community did in a "Hindu-Majority country"
*In countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iran etc the number is in Millions😭😭*
This is Proof for "All Religions are not equal"
Islam = Adharma
Proof :- quran chapter 9 verse 123, chapter 8 verse 55
*We all Hindus should take a moment to Honour our ancestors who even in extreme situations didn't convert to this Adharma spreaders and stayed true to their Hindu identity🙏🕉️*
😂😂 without bias 😂😂😂
Can you explain how aryans invaded harappans and destroyed them..... Don't try.. People may know the truth.
You deleted this comment also.... Why are you so afraid.....
Aryan invasion theory is bs... It's a colonial propaganda and has been debunked hundred of times by indian historians... It was introduced to create the mindset which you have today and i guess they were pretty successful🎉🎉🎉
The first invaders coming to India are Aryansi .e. Northern Indians Dravidians are real Indians .
Her posts are prime examples of the fact that hate sells better than anything else in India today. There is lot frustration in India due to various social factors and Indians have found a way to vent that frustration by targeting a particular community through social media for a temporary relief. This will cumulatively result in a catastrophe for India.
No... A particular community can't digest facts and so they cry 😂😂😂
You just want the good sides then go see some other channel
How can Akbar be called invador when you don't have boundaries and ruled by hundreds of kings fighting each other.....
Shhh... dont say that too loudly.
Mughals never identified themselves as indian origins. They valued their turkic origins and called themselves descendants of temur.... Not indian rulers...most of the ministers in their courts were foreigners...how are they not invaders????
Akbar did some bad work doesn't means he is not great. He united North India after longtime. That period was golden age , peaceful and flourishing compare to choas before mughals.
Yes he was a good administrator.
But calling him a saintly figure wouldn't be right.
@@agniswar3 none of them called... Akbar, the Saint sir.. 😄
Nobody calls him great personnel, he just mention as one of the part of India's history who expanded largely and it was right before British took over
Kudos, Keerthi for your passionate and critical analyses of distortions of Indian history. Keep posting well-researched videos. Appreciate your effort.
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
Why are we not focussing more effort on making underrated kings who were great, brave & just?
And focus on bringing down people who are considered great (real or not)... because that is what trends now and sad Keerthi is following it.
Keerthi consider a series of episodes on Chola Vs Pandyas enmity history... and how Chola lineage is not traceable now...
There are so many kings in Dravidian kingdoms in the last 1000 years, but we are not hearing enough about them.
She Won't get views unless she spreads lies about muslim empires😂
Mam abkar was much better than south indians atleast he didn't detest or boycott hindi language😅.
Hindi is not our language. It is a mixture of many languages.
@@dhananjaykumarsingh5208 it may not yours but ours and will be ours, You hate mongering peace of c***.
Great in history means who creates a big empire defeating many kings , and lives until a natural death .like Alexnder , sultan Suleman...
You are doing great job didi..keep it up...jai hind jai bharat🔥
😇❤️🙏🏼
My interest towards history is going on increasing only because of ur valuable information.. Thanks a lot keerti Akka ♥️
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
If Akbar was Great
Then
Why do we worship
Maharana Pratap?
who Faught with him tirelessly?
And Mind it that
This one Guhilot/ sisodia clan
Of Mewar
right from the Bappa Rawals time
In 712AD
To the Mughals1700s kept fighting
Against the Islamic Invaders.
Purest form of Bhakti Propaganda, you do realise that the word great is even attriibuted to even worse kings than him Genghis khan alexander the great who massacred even more people than him. Andhbhakts like you have to realise that things where we hold in disgust these days were common back then. The great word was given becauase of his reforms from those customs back then.
I wouldn't even say Akbar is the 'best out of the worst' when it comes to Islamic rulers in Bharat. His older brother, Dara Shikoh, was leagues better (still an invader and part of the genocidal bloodthirsty Mughal barbarians, of course); he translated 52 chapters of an upanishad, and the Bhagavad Gita into Persian. He actually had decent conversations with a Sanatani guru, and was hated by the Mughals and the Mughal court, hated by muslims, but at least somewhat liked by Sanatani's. I don't know the full story. But in the end, his head was chopped off and paraded around the city during the war of succession, to Akbar's utter glee. Akbar was an evil man, and no amount of narcissm, self aggrandising, attempting to culturally degrade and poison Sanatana Dharma to convert Hindus, or religious pandering will override the massive genocides and boiling hatred he had for us. There can be nuance in conversation about the facts, but it doesn't change the genocide of 30000 Hindus and murder of Brahmanas.
There is only 108 legitimate upanishads. Allopanishad is a disgusting and pitiful attempt to poison our dharma and inject Abrahamic religion into Dharmic parampara. There is no 109th upanishad or fifth veda. That's all.
Namaskaram. Thank you so much for this video, Keerthi. I was getting really curiosu about Akbar after hearing of his brother, Dara Shikoh, and wondering what Akbar was like. Thank you for showering your knowledge upon us. May Saraswati bless you
🙏
Dara shikoh was brother of Aurangazeb, not Akbar
Dara Shikoh was beloved by everyone. His father wanted to make him next Badshah I hind. Shehzadi Jahanara also sided with him. He is best among all mughals, decent prince of india.
Akbar was good in administration.
Dara Shikoh was Akbars great grandson, not his brother. You are confusing him with Aurangzeb. Maybe think before you write anything.
Mannn Keerthi☺️☺️☺️☺️😍😍...I came here to make fun of your accent and the way you speak. But it's been five hours and I'm hooked to each and every one of your vedios . Massive respect . You earned this follower!!!
Most Indians have an influence of native language with accent. Scottish have an accent
Mughals were a minority in india and hindus were the majority. Most of the soldiers in mugh army were hindus . How could the mugals have commited these destruction of temples , discriminations , injustice and oppression to the hindus.
yea right, gyanvapi mosque wasnt something mughals did right? and neither did the mughals do anything at krishna janam bhoomi , right? mughals were strict followers of islam. search quran 9:5 on google
All converted muslim from generations will troll her for telling the truth.
👏👏👏 Good job, Keep it forward 👍
Thank you, I will❤
"He's definitely the best out of the worst". Yup that's the perfect description you could give him.
This tells everything about M us lim Community.
Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴
This tells everything about M us lims.
Worst in our community = Best in their community🥴
He waged wars on Indian kings !! Does there is a concept of INDIA in 16th century!! Wake up and read NCERT books once again than telling nonsense to people !!
If she tells you something, how do you guys not question her! You are questioning the things you have studied for you entire life with the things she is saying without even questioning her for the facts.
You can trust her more than what was taught to you at school??
Who is she and from where is she bringing all this?
We are not sheeps to believe just what you say!
Plzz tell me what is your source ...
I mean how did u know all this ..
In books even in google evruthng written falsely ....
Bro she's a historian...
Make a full detailed video about Vijayanagara empire and shri krishna devaraya,because even Mughal king Babur mentioned Shri Krishna devaraya in his autobiography and said that he would not dare to attack southern part of bharat because of the presence of Shri Krishna devaraya ,he was undefeated his whole life.....but school/college history books don't teach much about them...
Yes...just 2 or 3 sentences are allotted to the great king...
Akbar's own chronicles by his son mention that he ordered 40 thousand non-shashtria Hindu men, women, and children to the sword for supporting Maharana Pratap when he fought Akbar
Akbar was a monster.
I'm deeply studied akbar we can't denied that think that he is tha one of the great bcoz of his tactics and his war skills most of historian agreed that akbar have only for 4 wife's so don't ruined history its can't change so
Best out of the worst . I love your last sentence😂
Vedanta never say about polithesism. It says about one supreme power. Every 'your so called Indian kings' comes from an invader also. Rajput and cholas are production of mixed marriage. You mention about her harem. On that time, kings had also a lot of wives and baijis also. If you are against polygamy, why you remain silent about this? They come here, live here, rule here, accept our indic culture..... Still they are invaders. Aryan comes also. They destroyed Ajibaks and other inhabitants.... But that's not a crime.... They are never invaders to our Keerthi Mam. She just served ownself for Godi- government's ideology.
Who are not the invaders of India since 2500 BC , Answer this 🥲
Hats off to you and your efforts. Till day we are all studying history in weong manner and incorrectly 😢. I wish your videos could reach each nook and corner of our country so that atleast few of us will be aware of our real history 😢
1:08 1. Akbar had 6 wives. And it has been confirmed as well.
1:12 2. Akbar married the wife of Bahram Khan as she was Widowed and needed support No force was Involved.
2:12 3. We know the name of Jodha, it was Hira Kunwari, Mariam-Uz-Zamani was a title that was given to people by Akbar to show his respect for them, like Birbal and Tansen.
3:38 4. The Religious communities at the time were very much aggressive towards each other it wasn't specific that only Hindus were "bullied" multiple religions at the time fought each other constantly.
3:38 5. It weren't his ministers who treated Hindus badly it were ulaimas that Akbar later on removed.
3:48 6. The policies against non-muslims called Zimma were not forced by Akbar but Ulaimas that Akbar later on removed
4:55 7. Akbar was very much satisfied with Islam, he introduced Din-E-Ilahi as he believed religious scholars and religions were the problems causing religious intolerance. Proved by the fact that he removed the Ulaimas.
5:31 8. Infallible Decree or Mahzar described the law stating - people could not consider their religion as supreme and others as false. There is no mention of Akbar being the messenger of god.
7:20 9. Mam I'd like to ask you a question, you yourself said to rediscover our history ourselves and not trust the british history as they were political tactics but you believe in James Todd, Why? James Todd's theory has been proved wrong and false, the 30,000 death count you mention was never confirmed, and though there were deaths, they happened during the battle not after it and they were only soldiers not commoners.
@@RedRebel008Copy paste karte rehte ho...
@@i_am_very_happy798 I take it personally when someone tries to distort history 🙂🙂🙂
Akbar was only king who was left from attack of SANGHIS..... n finally it's done big salute to u sanghi keerty😂
Bhenchod Chup rahe madarse
Genuine question, was any wrong information in what she told?
@@TK-vj5fl only conspiracy story.... She is the best youTube educator with facts and fictional stories
@@gowthampatelu1653 if someone criticise an invader automatically doesn't make them sanghi lol.Just give some facts which proves her points are wrong. I want to know the real history of india. So kindly update me with facts what she has said wrongly.
Best out of worst. 😂 Best
For us Rajasthani our Great hero is Maharana Pratap 🚩 not any Akbar.
Never thought Akbar great but he was a street smart Mughal emperor and very diplomatic and political king. He knew to handle the human relationship so well
I have been waiting for this content sis,bcoz of you I got interest in history,respect for my culture and embracing my culture 😊😊
More power to you girl❤
😇❤️🙏🏼
Akbar was not great... He was completely tyranny... Shivji was great