Tanner and Harv are fictional characters and their words are merely off the page. So, give credit to the writers who wrote the script and then accept the fact that this is a make believe story about make believe characters that don't really exist.
Love Tanner and his arc. A devious yet equally charming version of Harvey with a low-key persona and a disposition to cross even more lines than Harvey. Props to the actor as well
“You’re 0-2 against me, and the 0 isn’t the number that’s gonna change” is such a killer line. Gotta remember that whenever I find myself up against anyone on anything ever lol
Travis Tanner should have become a partner in the firm but continued to have contentious relationship with Harvey. Eric Close played this role so well. I also wish Scottie was a longer term character and ended up with Harvey instead of Donna. Abigail Spencer played Scottie so well also.
"At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party." Based on Tanner's attitude Harvey had grounds to end the deposition since it started, he just chose to end it where he did because he judged it went too far.
Harvey always claimed that he won against Tanner twice. But it is not true. The first one? Yeah Harvey only "won" that because he was willing TO PERJURE himself. Committing a CRIME to win against another attorney isn't really winning. It's called a sham. The second one? Hardman was pulling his strings. He didn't really lose. Maybe he knew that he had a flimsy evidence but chose to take the case anyway because Hardman blackmailed him. Wouldn't be the first time Hardman does that to get ahead. Harvey also laughed when Mike told him that Tanner plays Tennis. Which actually in itself is laughable since if you are an American Football fan, Tennis and Basketball fans are BOTH THE SAME LOSERS in their eyes. My point here is unlike Stemple, Tanner IS the only lawyer who can beat Harvey. And he was about to during THE ONLY real case he had against him: Tim Petrov. Only problem was he lost his edge after converting to being kind. He did get one by him by using the Birth Certificate. Such a simple defense and so dumb for Harvey to overlook. If he was serious, Harvey would stand defeated.
Harvey was never willing to perjure himself, it was a bluff, a bluff that worked and won the case. If tanner called his bluff Harvey would have lost. Bluffs are actually a thing 😂 your second point is moot as it's based on speculation and innuendo. Dropping the case regardless of reason is a loss..... 🤣
Winning is winning no matter how you go about it. Cheating to win is winning, so long as you succeed. And losing is still losing no matter what excuses you give. And you've just proven tanner is 0/2.
Echoing above. He was not willing to perjure himself. He was bluffing, so he still won. In the second instance, the whole thing was set up by Hardman anyway so neither one won or lost that one.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how tanner calls him Harv in an antagonistic way
Tanner and Harv are fictional characters and their words are merely off the page. So, give credit to the writers who wrote the script and then accept the fact that this is a make believe story about make believe characters that don't really exist.
Love Tanner and his arc. A devious yet equally charming version of Harvey with a low-key persona and a disposition to cross even more lines than Harvey. Props to the actor as well
Tanner is literally Harvey's twin. They would make a killing show together being brothers
Hardman, Forstman, Tanner
Top 3 antagonists
How dare you forget Sean Cahill?
@@msdahbie more like Eric Woodall. Cahill quickly switched sides and became more of an ally than antagonist
Elliott Stemple, Andrew Malik?
I think Anita Gibbs is the worst antagonist in this show
@@msdahbie nah he's far from a villian, he was bad for like the 6 episodes in s4, and every since then he was an ally, especially in s6
“You’re 0-2 against me, and the 0 isn’t the number that’s gonna change” is such a killer line. Gotta remember that whenever I find myself up against anyone on anything ever lol
Just make sure the scoreboard is correct lol
Trash talk doesn't work in real life.
thats not possible... its necessary....
@@anuragchakraborty8766Sometimes s&$t gets real 😅
@@anuragchakraborty8766 it works if the other person is weak minded, and mind games is manipulative.
😂😂😂 I love how pointless that disposition was. Tanner literally got nothing other than office gossip and he walks away like “yea job done!”
it's like Harvey said, don't play the case play the man. difference is Tanner is Harvey's worst qualities and wants only to spite his opponent
Tanner is one guy who could get under Harvey's skin.
he did it to cause a rift between them which obviously worked
He played the man
Deposition
Tanner could have had his own series where he loses all his cases
maybe, but he was the only one who made Harvey feel with less confidence in himself in certain moments
As far as we know, Tanner only lost to Harvey, which is why he was so focused on winning against him.
💀💀💀💀 an the series would still be 🔥🔥 🔥
Tanner was a great villain. I hope they bring him back too in suits LA
Tanner is one of the best villains for sure
He's secretly in love with Harvey (my theory)
I wonder how many extra applications Harvard Law School has received since Suits was released
It doesn’t matter, they reject them all anyways
every single one of them should've been debarred in the first season alone XD
Very original..
8:20 Love that ending
I love how like only half the cussing is censored😂😂😂
travis’ smile never fails, shame he always loses
he always lost because the writers made it so. they should have made have at least 1 win.
Jessica looks incredible in that black outfit. She’s so glamorous!
Imagine if these two ever worked on a case together.
Imagine how fun it woulda been on set being Harvey and Tanner 😂
Had there been a Tanner vs Louis moment, that would have been epic to watch.
I just like to picture Catelyn Stark onto Eva's face.
One of my favorite clips of the whole series
How did Tanner know so many personal details? Some, Harvey didn't even know.
Tanner's "guy" was obviously more resourceful than Harvey's.
Harvey Specter Monthly is now available at Harvard Law School
Uhh it’s been renamed as Harvey Law School 😂😂
@@thoarnejones6805 lol
Funny hot Harvey happened to have a coin to make his point
all harveys carry a coin at all times
Someone should call Tanners mom.
That actor man! He makes you want to punch him in every scene he's in.
Travis Tanner should have become a partner in the firm but continued to have contentious relationship with Harvey. Eric Close played this role so well. I also wish Scottie was a longer term character and ended up with Harvey instead of Donna. Abigail Spencer played Scottie so well also.
Louis is the king, none to match him.
love tanner getting under everyone's skin. Would hate going up against a guy like him.
The Queen of Winterfell was not pleased
can a real lawyer enlighten me: how come harvey can end a deposition whenever he pleases?
There are no lawyers here.
He can't. He has to have grounds, which he did here because Tanner was being a total POS
"At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party."
Based on Tanner's attitude Harvey had grounds to end the deposition since it started, he just chose to end it where he did because he judged it went too far.
Halfway through, and the video is interrupted by an advert for some **** supermarket! Do they *really* think that will entice me to shop there?
well, Jessica warned Scottie not to attend the deposition.
Harvey is the main character,so he has to win 😂😂
😂😂😂😂he got them
iOS 3:18 Catherine stark 😭
Am a shark Harvey i love the taste of blood. This line got me
Tanner deserves another whole series about him
@1:10 You've probably heard this before; O isn't a number. Apparently, 0 isn't either. 😂
Is this how depositions will be conducted in the real world?
more amicably and with a court reporter stand in writing a transcript alongside the video but yes other than that some are
I live for Tanner vs Harvey ❤
I wish tanner and harvey worked on a case
what season is this?
3
Love Tanner :)
They should've had Tanner and Harvey trade wins
That dress!
Monthly subscription 💀
"o" is not a number.
Have you tried therapy?
Both side won
they can intrude anything within their legal reasoning and i'd go yeah yeah i'm not following but sounds clever
Harvey
Season 1 and 2 where epic! Season 3 was solid.
After that season is pointless, went downhill
Top 3 most punchable faces in Suits
Exactly
Tanner is Evil
I didnt know you were allowed to act like this in depositions.
You aren't
We don’t know you
You can't trust the hot ones
Tgat starting dialogue was so cheesy
Silly Harvey, O isn’t a number
Harvey always claimed that he won against Tanner twice. But it is not true.
The first one? Yeah Harvey only "won" that because he was willing TO PERJURE himself. Committing a CRIME to win against another attorney isn't really winning. It's called a sham.
The second one? Hardman was pulling his strings. He didn't really lose. Maybe he knew that he had a flimsy evidence but chose to take the case anyway because Hardman blackmailed him. Wouldn't be the first time Hardman does that to get ahead.
Harvey also laughed when Mike told him that Tanner plays Tennis. Which actually in itself is laughable since if you are an American Football fan, Tennis and Basketball fans are BOTH THE SAME LOSERS in their eyes.
My point here is unlike Stemple, Tanner IS the only lawyer who can beat Harvey. And he was about to during THE ONLY real case he had against him: Tim Petrov. Only problem was he lost his edge after converting to being kind. He did get one by him by using the Birth Certificate. Such a simple defense and so dumb for Harvey to overlook. If he was serious, Harvey would stand defeated.
Harvey was never willing to perjure himself, it was a bluff, a bluff that worked and won the case. If tanner called his bluff Harvey would have lost. Bluffs are actually a thing 😂 your second point is moot as it's based on speculation and innuendo. Dropping the case regardless of reason is a loss..... 🤣
Hahahahaah you clearly haven’t watched the show
Winning is winning no matter how you go about it. Cheating to win is winning, so long as you succeed. And losing is still losing no matter what excuses you give. And you've just proven tanner is 0/2.
Either you only watch via RUclips or you don’t pay attention to the show
Echoing above. He was not willing to perjure himself. He was bluffing, so he still won. In the second instance, the whole thing was set up by Hardman anyway so neither one won or lost that one.
Tannr won this one. I'm also anti LGBT and homophobic.
Welcome to the club brother!
Uhhh based department?
@@greatsouthernbants7284 a club that should have no membership.