Can you say if filter slots meant for 2mm or 4mm thickness filters? cine 4x4 filters are 4mm, but photographic 100x100 filters are 2mm What you screw in on 8:43? You havent shown this And can u make 80mm adapter? Bc 80mm is the standard for compact lenses
Designed to be up to 3mm thick, not suitable for 4mm thick filters. Suitable for filters with a thickness of 2 to 2.5 mm. This is a scene where the 95mm filter adapter is mounted and fixed. For fixing the matte box to a lens with a 95mm filter thread in the front. The 95mm filter thread is just a personal preference, and some parts of the adapter are also off-the-shelf and not mentioned. Unfortunately I'm designing this for personal use and running my RUclips channel just to share some trivial ideas along the way. We ask for your understanding that we cannot respond to individual requests.
@@MountainBreezeStudio i understamd, will model it myself But can u share what u used to screw in? And what parts i need to change to make slots 4mm compatible?
I love this design so much and will probably print it, but the only question I have is if you can place 4x5.6 filters horizontally like they normally go, or is it only vertically? I'd love to print this matte box, but I am looking for this feature. Still, love this and so many more of your designs. Hope this question reaches you!
A 4x5.65" filter (or 100x150mm) can only be mounted vertically. Horizontally Graduated filters for Cinema are too expensive and cannot be adjusted up and down, so they are relatively inexpensive and are designed to fit up and down vertically graduated filters. :)
@@MountainBreezeStudio Yeah that makes sense. I was hoping to use filters like from Prism Lens FX where they have 4x5.6 filters that have to go the right way horizontally like the lens flare filter they have. Nonetheless, still love the designs and the work you do. Can't wait to see more and thanks for the fast and informative reply!
@Mountain Breeze Studio Great work! I just noticed that you fixed the frame mask with tape inside the matte box but at the beginning of the video you made a slot in Fusion360 maybe to fix it without tape? Seems like it didn't made it into the final design.
Hello! Brilliant design. Just printed and assembled it after many months of wishing! 😁 Which of your lenses are you using with the matte box? I’m trying to figure out which of your lens housings has the correct 100mm size. Any suggestions for going smaller? Like to your Helios housings? Thank you SO MUCH
About a year ago, a marketer from a manufacturer specializing in camera lenses came to me and said that they would like to refer to Matbox for lens-related accessory development. At that time, I donated a matte box for reference, so I don't have it now. At the hobby level, I enjoy photography and simple video shooting with vintage lenses, so the matte box is cumbersome. Recently released cinema lenses tend to be smaller than in the past. It looks like the front threads shrink from 114mm to mostly 100mm or 95mm or 82mm. We want to reflect this trend. But recently, moreover, a lot of relatively inexpensive cinema lenses from China that show a vintage look have been released, so I'm skeptical about working with 3D printing.
@@MountainBreezeStudio You don’t have to worry about Chinese lenses. The current slightly cheaper lenses in China are not good at all in actual testing. Of course, some of the quality is not bad. A series of future trends such as 3D printing are still very good in my opinion. The products you designed, I Really like it. Looking forward to more products.
안녕하세요. 렌즈마다 포커싱 내부의 방식이 저마다 달라서 딱히 된다 안된다 말하기 어렵습니다. 최근 렌즈들의 전자 제어 포커스 방식에서 하드 스탑이 아닌 경우에는 내부에 수동 포커싱과 자동 포커싱에 따라 클러치 방식으로 전환되는 경우가 대부분 인듯합니다. (토키나 렌즈처럼 이런 방식이 외부에서 확연하게 드러나는 풀-푸쉬 클러치 조작 방식도 있지만, 대부분은 이런 클러치 동작이 내부에서 전자적으로 MF/AF 전환 등 이루어지지 싶네요) 추측해보면, 전자 제어 포커스에서 하드스탑 장식을 취하지 않는 이유 (정밀도의 문제나 내구성 문제 등, AF에서 MF로 전환할 때 서로 다른 거리 정보를 일치시켜야 하는데 이런 문제 해결이 쉽지 않아 보입니다. 이런 정보의 괴리를 상쇄하기 위해서는 수동 포커스 링 정보와 AF 변화를 계속 연동되도록해야 하는데, 이런 방식을 취하면 AF 시에도 외부의 수동 포커스 링이 같이 회전하는 아주 불편한 방식-이런 류의 렌즈가 몇몇 있습니다- 이 되지 않을까요)가 분명히 있어 보이고, 이런 방식의 렌즈들은 내부 구조를 개조하지 않고, 단순히 외부에서 하드스탑이 되도록 바꾸는 것은 곤란하지 않을까 생각합니다. 해외 자료 중에서 시그마 18-35 스틸용 렌즈에 외부에서 하드스톱이 가능하도록 외부 포커스 링에 부착하는 간단한 개조 방식을 본 적이 있지만, 단지 참고만 했고, 렌즈의 내부 포커스 구동 구조를 직접 확인하지 못해서 그 방식이 효율적인지 잘 모르겠네요. 매우 단순한 구조라서 흥미롭기는 했습니다. (참고할 수 있도록 링크를 걸어드리고 싶은데 찾을 수가 없네요). 요약하면 전자 제어 포커스 내부 구조가 꽤 다양하고, 내부 구동 기어 방식의 개조를 통해 불가능한 것은 아니지만, 배보다 배꼽이 큰 경우가 되지 않을까 싶습니다.
The weight of the printout will be affected a lot by the filament material selection and the internal fill setting in the 3D printer output. Since I wanted something lightweight, I chose PLA filament and an in-filling setting of 10%, and the finished mat box will be around 150-200g. (I didn't measure it because I didn't have a small scale, so it's an estimated weight)
It is designed in consideration of the different ways of attaching the matte box to the lens. It can be attached directly to a cinema lens with a front outer diameter of about 114mm or 100mm, and to correspond to various sizes of the front of the lens, use a ready-made accessory attached to a 15mm rod, or use an adapter (filter holder fixed term adapter, etc.) or a general magic arm accessory to fix it. Each device or situation is different, so we recommend that you find a method that suits your needs.
I was wondering when you might do this, brilliant job as always! I just want to ask you how much does it cost you to print one of your lens rehousings? I've been getting quotes from 3D printing companies in my country and all of them have given me a quote of €200+ for the Helios 44-2 rehousing, is it really that expensive to 3D print six parts?
It is difficult to say exactly because the service cost considering price and labor costs differs from country to country, but I think that it is expensive even considering that. I think it's better to buy an entry-level 3D printer and print it yourself. Kingroon kp3s, for example, can be purchased overseas for around €150 including shipping (which is an inexpensive 3D printer made in China, but it was recently launched and the printing performance is good and the assembly is simple, so the cost-effectiveness is very good!), filament, etc. Even if you buy all the ingredients, it is possible for around €200. That's enough for a Helios 44-2 lens housing to print about 10! 3D printing isn't that difficult, so I think it's easy to make it by searching for information on the web. Give it a try! ;-)
That's brilliant, I've been thinking about buying a 3D printer for a while now and this is the best option I've found yet. What filament would you recommend I should get for producing lens rehousing? Also, do you have any Russian lenses you have in mind right now that you want to rehouse?
@@Johndunneeee I live in a busy city and I prefer eco-friendly materials because I use the printer inside the building. Therefore, I mainly use PLA or special PLA containing carbon or wood powder. However, considering the durability of the printout and the convenience of post-processing, I think ABS filament will be a better choice. Nevertheless, ABS has a more demanding output environment, and must be well ventilated due to harmful and nasty odors. In addition, there are different advantages and disadvantages depending on the characteristics of the filament material, which is similar to the color selection of the filament and is related to each person's taste and preference. I don't have any lenses I'd like to add special yet because I think I already have enough lenses to use. The more I try to own, the proportionately my worries will increase! :)
I figured that I'll get a 3d printer to print my own rehousings and other things, thanks for the great advice. Would you know of any companies that would be able to print lens rehousings for a reasonable price? I need one for a college project my brother and I are working on very soon.
Incredible!! awesome... one question, ¿this mate box is only for square filters or is possible use with circular rotatory nd filters? thank you for your work and your reply!
The rotary circular filter up to 95mm is also designed to be used. (Circular rotatory filter must be attached to the front thread of the lens) The lower part is opened so that it can be operated by hand through the groove in the lower part. However, it would be difficult to use a square filter and a rotatory circular filter at the same time.
@@MountainBreezeStudio Incredible!! for me it is suficient, I have good circular ND filters for my lens, great job, I will send you a donation shortly by paypal because I have already printed several of your models with my 3d printer and you deserve it, a big hug!!! :)
thks man! i've been made all my camera rig in 3d printed! just with your projects!!
Thanks, amazing design! been using it for a while with diy filters
Wow amazing. Thank you so much for the mattbox
This dude, most epic camera modder king :)
Incredible
I liked your concept. I would like to try them 😍😍👍
You are just amazing!
I really admire your work.
Can't wait to see next episode!
I will do my best to live up to your expectations! :)
very good job, congratulations !!👍👍
This is brillant my friend, i wish you the best, because u take so much effort and time in this models.
I realize I am kinda randomly asking but do anybody know a good site to stream newly released movies online ?
@Payton Nova ehh I watch on flixportal. just google after it:) -angel
@Angel Cannon thanks, I went there and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :) I really appreciate it!
@Payton Nova Glad I could help xD
Amazing content I love everything you do on this channel!
I REALLY LOVE YOUR WORK! and I ADMIRE IT VERY MUCH!!
Can you please do a KAMLAN 28mm 1.4 REHOUSING PLEASE!
Sorry. I don't have a Camlan lens so I can't try it. :'
Great job. Thanks for the video.
Can you say if filter slots meant for 2mm or 4mm thickness filters?
cine 4x4 filters are 4mm, but photographic 100x100 filters are 2mm
What you screw in on 8:43?
You havent shown this
And can u make 80mm adapter?
Bc 80mm is the standard for compact lenses
Designed to be up to 3mm thick, not suitable for 4mm thick filters. Suitable for filters with a thickness of 2 to 2.5 mm.
This is a scene where the 95mm filter adapter is mounted and fixed. For fixing the matte box to a lens with a 95mm filter thread in the front. The 95mm filter thread is just a personal preference, and some parts of the adapter are also off-the-shelf and not mentioned.
Unfortunately I'm designing this for personal use and running my RUclips channel just to share some trivial ideas along the way. We ask for your understanding that we cannot respond to individual requests.
@@MountainBreezeStudio i understamd, will model it myself
But can u share what u used to screw in?
And what parts i need to change to make slots 4mm compatible?
WOW ！i love it！Can it be installed on the lens housing of the Tokina AT-X pro 28-70 you designed?
What is the diameter of the screw used to control the forward and backward movement of the hood,?thank you
I love this design so much and will probably print it, but the only question I have is if you can place 4x5.6 filters horizontally like they normally go, or is it only vertically? I'd love to print this matte box, but I am looking for this feature. Still, love this and so many more of your designs. Hope this question reaches you!
A 4x5.65" filter (or 100x150mm) can only be mounted vertically. Horizontally Graduated filters for Cinema are too expensive and cannot be adjusted up and down, so they are relatively inexpensive and are designed to fit up and down vertically graduated filters. :)
@@MountainBreezeStudio Yeah that makes sense. I was hoping to use filters like from Prism Lens FX where they have 4x5.6 filters that have to go the right way horizontally like the lens flare filter they have. Nonetheless, still love the designs and the work you do. Can't wait to see more and thanks for the fast and informative reply!
드라이버처럼 손잡이 달린 육각렌치가 있는데 써보시길 추천합니다^^;;
넵! 제가 좀 게을러서 불편해도 그냥 쓰고 있었네요. 렌치 손잡이를 모델링과 3D 프린팅으로 출력해서 한번 만들어 봐야 겠어요! ^^;
@Mountain Breeze Studio Great work! I just noticed that you fixed the frame mask with tape inside the matte box but at the beginning of the video you made a slot in Fusion360 maybe to fix it without tape? Seems like it didn't made it into the final design.
AMAZING! i jut made a canon FD 50mm 1.4 ssc rehousing and its looking hooot! does the diamater from the ring it suits for all ur proyects?
very nice!
Hello! Brilliant design. Just printed and assembled it after many months of wishing! 😁
Which of your lenses are you using with the matte box? I’m trying to figure out which of your lens housings has the correct 100mm size.
Any suggestions for going smaller? Like to your Helios housings?
Thank you SO MUCH
About a year ago, a marketer from a manufacturer specializing in camera lenses came to me and said that they would like to refer to Matbox for lens-related accessory development. At that time, I donated a matte box for reference, so I don't have it now. At the hobby level, I enjoy photography and simple video shooting with vintage lenses, so the matte box is cumbersome.
Recently released cinema lenses tend to be smaller than in the past. It looks like the front threads shrink from 114mm to mostly 100mm or 95mm or 82mm. We want to reflect this trend. But recently, moreover, a lot of relatively inexpensive cinema lenses from China that show a vintage look have been released, so I'm skeptical about working with 3D printing.
@@MountainBreezeStudio You don’t have to worry about Chinese lenses. The current slightly cheaper lenses in China are not good at all in actual testing. Of course, some of the quality is not bad. A series of future trends such as 3D printing are still very good in my opinion. The products you designed, I Really like it. Looking forward to more products.
Can it be used for 82mm lens filter size?
안녕하세요 매번 영상 잘 보고있습니다 :)
혹시 궁금한점이 있는데요
24-70같은 일반 포토렌즈들을 하드스탑으로 리하우징하는 방법도 있을까요??
안녕하세요. 렌즈마다 포커싱 내부의 방식이 저마다 달라서 딱히 된다 안된다 말하기 어렵습니다. 최근 렌즈들의 전자 제어 포커스 방식에서 하드 스탑이 아닌 경우에는 내부에 수동 포커싱과 자동 포커싱에 따라 클러치 방식으로 전환되는 경우가 대부분 인듯합니다. (토키나 렌즈처럼 이런 방식이 외부에서 확연하게 드러나는 풀-푸쉬 클러치 조작 방식도 있지만, 대부분은 이런 클러치 동작이 내부에서 전자적으로 MF/AF 전환 등 이루어지지 싶네요) 추측해보면, 전자 제어 포커스에서 하드스탑 장식을 취하지 않는 이유 (정밀도의 문제나 내구성 문제 등, AF에서 MF로 전환할 때 서로 다른 거리 정보를 일치시켜야 하는데 이런 문제 해결이 쉽지 않아 보입니다. 이런 정보의 괴리를 상쇄하기 위해서는 수동 포커스 링 정보와 AF 변화를 계속 연동되도록해야 하는데, 이런 방식을 취하면 AF 시에도 외부의 수동 포커스 링이 같이 회전하는 아주 불편한 방식-이런 류의 렌즈가 몇몇 있습니다- 이 되지 않을까요)가 분명히 있어 보이고, 이런 방식의 렌즈들은 내부 구조를 개조하지 않고, 단순히 외부에서 하드스탑이 되도록 바꾸는 것은 곤란하지 않을까 생각합니다. 해외 자료 중에서 시그마 18-35 스틸용 렌즈에 외부에서 하드스톱이 가능하도록 외부 포커스 링에 부착하는 간단한 개조 방식을 본 적이 있지만, 단지 참고만 했고, 렌즈의 내부 포커스 구동 구조를 직접 확인하지 못해서 그 방식이 효율적인지 잘 모르겠네요. 매우 단순한 구조라서 흥미롭기는 했습니다. (참고할 수 있도록 링크를 걸어드리고 싶은데 찾을 수가 없네요). 요약하면 전자 제어 포커스 내부 구조가 꽤 다양하고, 내부 구동 기어 방식의 개조를 통해 불가능한 것은 아니지만, 배보다 배꼽이 큰 경우가 되지 않을까 싶습니다.
Great work. You're awesome❤️.
But one question how much does it weigh?
The weight of the printout will be affected a lot by the filament material selection and the internal fill setting in the 3D printer output. Since I wanted something lightweight, I chose PLA filament and an in-filling setting of 10%, and the finished mat box will be around 150-200g. (I didn't measure it because I didn't have a small scale, so it's an estimated weight)
Now if you can model a lens hood attachment to the back of that, we will be in business!
It is designed in consideration of the different ways of attaching the matte box to the lens. It can be attached directly to a cinema lens with a front outer diameter of about 114mm or 100mm, and to correspond to various sizes of the front of the lens, use a ready-made accessory attached to a 15mm rod, or use an adapter (filter holder fixed term adapter, etc.) or a general magic arm accessory to fix it. Each device or situation is different, so we recommend that you find a method that suits your needs.
@@MountainBreezeStudio hm
Can u make 80mm adapter? 80mm outer diameter is standard for compact lenses to use with clamp-on matteboxes
@@MountainBreezeStudio yeah agree with egor. A 82mm filter adapter would be the cherry on the top bro. Please make it.
Would this mattebox work with normal lenses without the cinemod?? Maybe using stepup rings?? Thankss
It's modeled to fit a 114mm outer diameter lens, so it won't fit well with lenses for regular stills cameras.
Hola, muy buen trabajo. Me podrías dar las dimensiones
I was wondering when you might do this, brilliant job as always!
I just want to ask you how much does it cost you to print one of your lens rehousings? I've been getting quotes from 3D printing companies in my country and all of them have given me a quote of €200+ for the Helios 44-2 rehousing, is it really that expensive to 3D print six parts?
It is difficult to say exactly because the service cost considering price and labor costs differs from country to country, but I think that it is expensive even considering that. I think it's better to buy an entry-level 3D printer and print it yourself. Kingroon kp3s, for example, can be purchased overseas for around €150 including shipping (which is an inexpensive 3D printer made in China, but it was recently launched and the printing performance is good and the assembly is simple, so the cost-effectiveness is very good!), filament, etc. Even if you buy all the ingredients, it is possible for around €200. That's enough for a Helios 44-2 lens housing to print about 10! 3D printing isn't that difficult, so I think it's easy to make it by searching for information on the web. Give it a try! ;-)
That's brilliant, I've been thinking about buying a 3D printer for a while now and this is the best option I've found yet.
What filament would you recommend I should get for producing lens rehousing?
Also, do you have any Russian lenses you have in mind right now that you want to rehouse?
@@Johndunneeee I live in a busy city and I prefer eco-friendly materials because I use the printer inside the building. Therefore, I mainly use PLA or special PLA containing carbon or wood powder. However, considering the durability of the printout and the convenience of post-processing, I think ABS filament will be a better choice. Nevertheless, ABS has a more demanding output environment, and must be well ventilated due to harmful and nasty odors. In addition, there are different advantages and disadvantages depending on the characteristics of the filament material, which is similar to the color selection of the filament and is related to each person's taste and preference.
I don't have any lenses I'd like to add special yet because I think I already have enough lenses to use. The more I try to own, the proportionately my worries will increase! :)
I figured that I'll get a 3d printer to print my own rehousings and other things, thanks for the great advice.
Would you know of any companies that would be able to print lens rehousings for a reasonable price?
I need one for a college project my brother and I are working on very soon.
Sorry! I'm not sure because I don't use a professional printing agency service. :(
Incredible!! awesome... one question, ¿this mate box is only for square filters or is possible use with circular rotatory nd filters? thank you for your work and your reply!
The rotary circular filter up to 95mm is also designed to be used. (Circular rotatory filter must be attached to the front thread of the lens) The lower part is opened so that it can be operated by hand through the groove in the lower part. However, it would be difficult to use a square filter and a rotatory circular filter at the same time.
@@MountainBreezeStudio Incredible!! for me it is suficient, I have good circular ND filters for my lens, great job, I will send you a donation shortly by paypal because I have already printed several of your models with my 3d printer and you deserve it, a big hug!!! :)