Will The Supreme Court Take Up This State's Assault Weapon & Magazine Bans?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 апр 2024
- Sportsman's Guide: www.sportsmansguide.com/?pmdg...
SAVE $20 Off Your 1st $100 Spent w/Code: GADGETS
Use Code: GUNGAG5 through May 31st to save 5% on Hornady freedom seeds!!!
Join my email list: leviathangroup.ac-page.com/gu...
Support GNG via Patreon: / gunsandgadgets
Blackout Coffee: www.blackoutcoffee.com/gng
GNG Shirts: www.tristartrading.com/jaredjj
Gun Owners of America: gunowners.org/gunsgadgets/
Join Firearms Policy Coalition: bit.ly/gunsandgadgets
Second Amendment Foundation: bit.ly/SAFGunsAndGadgets
Backup Channel: / 2ndamendmentnews
GunsandGadgets@charter.net
Guns & Gadgets Media
3101 Browns Mill Rd Ste 6
Johnson City, Tennessee 37604
---------------
WHAT I USE TO MAKE VIDEOS
---------------
MAIN CAMERA: amzn.to/2QfvKBP
VLOG LENS: amzn.to/2QtviAd
ZOOM LENS: amzn.to/2QdsSp9
VLOG CAMERA: amzn.to/35dnOtt
LIGHTING: amzn.to/3l4Mp9z
SOFTBOX: amzn.to/3JZ2Lyl
MICROPHONE: amzn.to/34lJEdW
2ND MIC: amzn.to/3DapZ0G
TRIPOD: amzn.to/44tTO8v
MEMORY: amzn.to/31ht4Ka
DRONE: amzn.to/3hlX5hI
DISCLAIMER: The materials available through Guns & Gadgets Media (including any show, episode, guest appearance, etc. appearing within) are for informational and entertainment purposes only.
The opinions expressed through this video are the opinions of the individual author and are for educational and documentary purposes only.
FAIR USE: In the rare instance I include someone else’s footage it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with the intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.
IMPORTANT: All shooting is done on state-approved firing ranges by trained professionals. Our videos are produced in a safe environment by highly trained professionals with decades of experience. These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of anything demonstrated in my videos is done AT YOUR OWN RISK. Do not attempt to replicate the actions featured in our videos without the proper training, licensing, and medical professionals present.
We are not attempting to sell you the items featured in this video. We are not instructing our viewers on how to modify firearms, accessories, or otherwise change their basic legal function. All firearms and accessories are legal products commonly available in stores all across the United States. Our videos are for entertainment purposes only. We are not a gun shop and DO NOT sell or deal in Firearms. Such a practice is heavily regulated and subject to applicable laws. I DO NOT sell parts, magazines, or firearms.
© 2024 Guns & Gadgets Media
#2a #2ndamendment #breakingnews #breaking
Sportsman's Guide: www.sportsmansguide.com/?pmdgtl=1&webpagedate-
SAVE $20 Off Your 1st $100 Spent w/Code: GADGETS
Use Code: GUNGAG5 through May 31st to save 5% on Hornady freedom seeds!!!
Join my email list: leviathangroup.ac-page.com/guns-and-gadgets-sign-up-page
GNG Website & Affiliate Links: www.gunsngadgets.com
Support GNG via Patreon: www.patreon.com/GUNSandGADGETS
Blackout Coffee: www.blackoutcoffee.com/gng
GNG Shirts: www.tristartrading.com/jaredjj
Gun Owners of America: gunowners.org/gunsgadgets/
Join Firearms Policy Coalition: bit.ly/gunsandgadgets
Second Amendment Foundation: bit.ly/SAFGunsAndGadgets
GNG Email List: linktr.ee/gunsandgadgets
Hi Jared. The Guns N Glory Show was deleted. I got tired of the fascism.
200,000 in New Jersey. Not to nit-pick but!
All gun laws are infringements.
They are also CRIMINAL.
And dual taxes on guns. Commiefornia
Our government cannot effectively Rule of us if we have a means of resistance. Get educated in science stuff and minore manufacturing. They can't take that away!
Exactly
Remember, our Founders said we have the UNALIENABLE Right to remove and replace "any form of government" in the 2nd Paragraph of the Declaration [And they repeated this Right two sentences later and included that there is a "duty" to exercise this Right. This Right is prescribed-as-protected under the 9th Amendment.
Again, our Founders used the term "U N A L I E N A B L E". Therefore, our Founders, who wrote our Declaration and Constitution DID NOT BELIEVE SUCH RIGHT AND DUTY COULD BE TAKEN AWAY. Therefore OUR FOUNDERS DID NOT, by any provision within the Declaration, OR ANY OTHER SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENT, abolish or circumvent this Right. Further, our Founders did not assign the authority to do so to anyone else IN ANY SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENT.
Therefore, We cannot have that Right and duty, yet still have to ask, the government we deem is in need of replacing, for the means, OR THE PERMISSION TO OBTAIN THE MEANS, to do so.
See 10th Cir. case No. 2023-5099.
If the supreme Court is supposed to defend the U.S. constitution, they should rule accordingly.
ALL courts are suppose to defend the U.S. Constitution, but we all know how that goes!
Congress is supposed to "support & defend the US CONSTITUTION" and yet they wrote & passed the NFA.
@@xxxlonewolf49 And the GCA 1968,the Hughes Amendment, and the Boland Amendment,they also created the ATF.
Some people on the Supreme Court have no clue where to find the Constitution.
You would think with a 5.5 "conservative" majority these cases would've been ruled on and settled years ago!!
If a state could nullify any part of the Constitution or Bill of Rights, we'd still have people picking cotton for free.....
Actually no, because those people have guns now and will stick a boot up their asses. Gun control has literally existed since America's inception. They justified it by saying black and natives were property so the Constitution didn't apply. Dredd Scott v Sanford
Excellent point.
You just won the Internet Post of the Day award!
Better times
Point on
SCOTUS must take up this case. States have no right to make unconstitutional laws. It is the Supreme Court's job to stop that from happening.
Thats never stopped them before? The courts aren't gonna save us. Prepare accordingly!
Ohhh and what if they dont?
Do you really think ca/ny care what the court says?
@@magustrigger9195The People care what SCOTUS says.
We don't have a 2nd amendment anymore
@@magustrigger9195 and that’s why Ive been saying for decades that we need to kick Ca/NY and several other states out of the union.
A quick rant from a California resident.
I’m so sick of not being able to purchase flavored tobacco, order ammo online, purchase the type of firearm I want that isn’t on a fucking roster. I’m tired of all these decisions being made for me like we were fucking children. I see all these cool pew pews on line, and all I can do is dream. I’m fucking sick of it. Ok that’s my 2 cents. Thanks for listening. VOTE, VOTE, VOTE people! Donate money to GOA, FPC,CRPA, etc. Fire up the printers and let’s sue this state for infringing upon our basic human rights!!!!
Easy to say - But run far away from that FAILED State! what do you think the "genius" Gov Newsome is gonna do to you taxpayers with his massive multi billion deficit? that 24 billion is mysteriously just missing?
💯
Even if they take the case, California will make a new law stating they have to be carbon neutral or have a loaded chamber indicator
I’m sick of it all as well. Have been for a long time. Donating to these groups will get us a lot farther than voting. Don’t get me wrong, I vote every single time,and we all need to, but I don’t expect it to change anything. Maybe one day we’ll have the numbers, or the uncorrupt system here, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon.
@@tmango78 wrong wrong wrong, since the 9th circuit is ran by lefties, only trump can add more judges,,, god and Jesus can argue for the 2a community and the ninth will still swipe it down…. Most cases never make it out of the circuit court and their decision stands…. So donating will get you nowhere… better off with a gop president way better off…
Ok. What the Supreme Court needs to do is take up one of these cases, absolutely destroy it and rule in favor of blocking any and all weapon and mag bans and rule that said bans are illegal and unconstitutional REGARDLESS of how any state attempts to word them…PERIOD.
AND those who attempt to implement un-Constitutional laws should be jailed for attempted sedition.
Passing laws that violate the Constitution is a CRIME against the Constitution.
EXACTLY, then outline the punishment in detail.
What they really need to do is let those of us affected by their unconstitutional laws is let us sue each person signing in favor of the law s personally for say $1000.00 per law maker per person affected
SHALL Not be Infringed
This is an exacting definition of the wording, "infringement"....our founding fathers were well aware of how governments behave, the spiral into "redefining" things. The encroachment, the encirclement...the "testing" of the outer borders, looking for weaknesses or the possibilities of "reinterpretation" of wordings.
@@AndieBlack13This is how authoritarianism started in china,Google, red shirts, untimidly this is the play book from china,brainwashed/indoctrinated our young folks. We need a miracle to.pull us from these weeds.
Over 1 billion 30 round AR mags in citizen hands makes it well beyond common use.
What does that matter?
Do you really believe logic or precedent makes a difference?
They make it up as they go
Edit* spelling
They are trying to make it uncommon via artificial means.
Common use is gay. The 2a doesn’t say anything about “common use”. It says “shall not be infringed” we should be able to own any weapon whether in common use or not
@@magustrigger9195 president?
@jimklemens5018 precedent*
I hit the wrong button on the spell check. Sorry for the confusion.
Since the senate decided they don’t have to obey the laws, why should we? Congress passes laws, but government people can decide on the spot, without any repercussions, to ignore, whatever they want. why should we obey?
Then we should be able to remove those politicians out of office since they work gor United States citizens that are taxpayers of this country.
@@keithheinz1724I concur. More gun owners and believers in the Constitution should Vote out the incumbent anti-2A politicians, where applicable, putting in Constitutional politicians. Add term limits, as well!
Weaver, Koresh and Malanowski.
The bottom line it’s unconstitutional and the violators should face legal repercussions for their willful violations of protected rights
It seems like for the past 10 years I constantly hear " the Supreme Court is taking on the assult weapons ban,the Supreme Court is taking on the magazine ban, the Supreme Court ruled against the magazine ban, the Supreme Court is taking on the magazine ban" WTF🤷♂️ How many time does the Court have to make a rule on the same thing?
🤷 an infinite amount of times. They can rule tomorrow that no state can ban any gun or magazine capacity and these states will still find loopholes or just ignore it and just face the consequences later on down the road. The goal is to temporarily ban something they know is protected from being banned long enough to put companies out of business in their states.
What you keep seeing is these gun channels put up daily videos acting like we have a chance just for clicks. Look at all of the thumbnails for any of these channels. It's the same thumbnail daily as we still lose our rights. All that matters to this guy is his viewership and clicks.
@@Mike-jf5ip 💯
Nyc has been waiting 90 years to get their rights back the states already know this..
Our state has had constitutional carry since the 1700s. Now they want to ban nearly every aspect of what has made us safe and free. No support group has been able to stop this tyrannical government from stripping our rights away little by little. Stay safe..
How many times do they have to keep ruling on these issues?? Wasn’t this addressed before???
Yes, but after they disarm us, they will have more infringements on our Rights.
Bruen was supposed to cover ALL gun laws. The lower courts keep ignoring that ruling on purpose.
Included NEW York State too please. Tired of living behind enemy lines.
Seriously. The infringements need to end.
There are plenty of NYC gun owners that want to own modern sporting rifles too
Well in California our judges keep delaying justice with only a few exceptions and Newsom attack's them
Impeach Newsome, that would solve your problems.
They are also guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section 241 conspiracy against rights and Title 18 U.S.C. section 242 deprivation of rights under color of law.
ARE THEY GOING TO RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION? WE LIVE IN A POST CONSTITUTIONAL ERA.
Who cares what they do or dont, just live free!
@@freedomfighter1861 Because I'd rather pay $400 for a 5.7 than $800 just because the $400 one has a 20 round mag...
Only if we continue to allow it.
I would love to live free but I can't in Washington
It’s the time where a Civil War may erupt
Even if SCOTUS rules in favor of pro 2A, Pritzker will ignore it.
He wipes his ass with the US Constitution.
And that's why pritzker and newsom, governor's of new York and new Mexico are trespassers of their offices illegally holding their offices and should be in a prison cell. But the justice department (courts)are corrupt and don't do their jobs.
He will be sued into compliance.
It won't matter if Pritzker ignores it, once unconstitutional, those cases will quickly get overturned on appeal. If the government continues to defy SCOTUS after that, then anyone still relying on these laws can get sued for A LOT of money. At worst, resistance will be 2-5 years after the ruling.
Oregon overturning its mag ban will have ramifications going forward, as it's in the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction. The cases before SCOTUS will cite that ruling as an example of a state following Bruen as SCOTUS stated. It's going to get ugly before it gets better but, the more they resist, the stronger the cases against them when all the FFLs and private citizens sue for damages. Stores have closed, some have lost a majority of their income, there will be damages that they can prove, the longer these laws are on the books.
There is a light at the end of the tunnel but it depends on how it's ruled and if an AWB will make it to SCOTUS. It's also a ruling that would effect the laws of 11 states. That's not something to take lightly and SCOTUS realizes it, especially with the litany of buzzwords, jargon, and half-baked arguments utilized by anti-gun lawyers and AGs. It's not just enough to state "This is Unconstitutional" but "Why". This is what Bruen has set up but there are something like 7-12 different bizarre arguments as to why AWBs don't violate the Constitution. All of those issues would have to be addressed in writing and that takes time. SCOTUS has aides who comb through history books and law books to sift through all of the madness. And they are usually doing this for multiple cases at a time.
It takes months to review all the facts of a given case, and that's with multiple people working on it for hours at a time. We also must remember that these people do not necessarily share the intensity of appreciation for the 2nd Amendment as we do. That doesn't make them traitors, it just makes guns "not their thing" and so for a lot of the people doing research into these topics, it's the first time they've ever been exposed to firearms and the mechanics of their function. This is why most of the cases involving firearms are about the individuals, rather than the regulation of firearms themselves.
The main case SCOTUS is hearing on the 2nd involves whether or not being having a restraining order means you can't own guns. There are multiple pending cases in review; losing gun rights over protective orders (Actually really important), owning firearms while using (or addicted to) an unlawful substance, and whether or not being imprisoned for longer than 1 year means you lose your rights (as a non-violent felon).
Notice none of those involve AWBs? They all are about the individual and their legally gray status on owning firearms.
If SCOTUS states that AWBs are on their face, violations of the US Constitution, that is the nationwide silver bullet. No state can enforce their AWBs, regardless of what their AGs and Governors want. They however, have to pick up an AWB case.
If they just rule in a single case, that a specific law is unconstitutional (this is more likely with the 7th Circuit) then that state is free and clear but everyone else is still screwed and it means that each state will have to have a case go before SCOTUS to see their bans struck down. States can also pass these laws again, reworded or with different arguments. It depends on how SCOTUS rules just as much as if they do.
Yes, this is complicated and infuriating that laws can take away our rights so quickly but the courts move as slow as they do. Until they need to pass more anti-gun legislation and suddenly government works at light speed all over again.
Now, there are SOME thing that we can do in the meantime. If you live in an AWB or Mag ban state, vote for an AG that will refuse to enforce unconstitutional laws. That's a quick and dirty way to offer some reprieve from these laws. Governor is next up, same idea. Then, push for signatures to get laws on the vote to repeal your AWBs. This is actually MUCH easier than waiting for SCOTUS to take a case and faster as well, because it allows you to take your frustration and anger and do something with it.
Volunteer to canvas in a ban-state. Donate to various legal groups fighting these laws. Run for office (Herrera did it).
No one is coming to save us. It's up to us to get this job done.
He needs to go to jail 18 US § 241 , 242
"Shall not be infringed" was not a suggestion. It was a directive.
Are you suggesting it matters to them?
Unless action occurs its all words and voting surely doesnt change crap
@magustrigger9195 I have been saying for years, we need to organize on a national level. Under one command structure.
I'm tired of the SCOTUS leaving the door cracked open in EVERY CASE just so the tyrants can continue to keep infringing. It flat out tells you that they are ALL in bed together because they never close and lock the door!
SCOTUS has already ruled arms in common use for lawful purposes CANNOT be banned. The court needs to slap these states with contempt charges as soon as the law gets signed.
Sadly there are justises on the Supreme Court who think the Bill Of Rights is more the bill of suggestions. That's why I don't think anything is going to happen in our favor.
Not just CA. Several other states, too. It's about time! 😢
Add Cuckorado to the list.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. PERIOD. AMERICA. 🤠
Hahaha you think it matters to them?
Unless you're willing to act its all just paper
@@magustrigger9195 What’s your definition of “act”
@@magustrigger9195nice fed post
@vikingoutlaw9 Well, my joking response was censured
But this is not the venue
Take up Connecticut’s ban too !!!
All the supreme court needs to say is shall not be infringed means never to be touched, inhibited, or construed in any way besides hands off.
Thanks for keeping us informed, Jared!
I thought this was all handled already once & for all?
The fact that this is even an issue shows we as Americans have failed to keep these evil POS politicians in their place.
I have no faith in any court these days.
It’s been decades of not having 2nd amendment rights in NYC. It’s time for all NY gun owners to finally get their rights back.
Hey Jared, Washington state had a 88 minute magazine freedom. But our AG in Washington state had a commissioner stayed the order who is a hard-core Democrat that is not even a judge on the wa Supreme Court.
Shall not be infringed!
You forgot about the California case to.
I also think is great that most of the Sheriffs of Illinos are not complying the ban !!!!
They absolutely should! But their handlers won’t allow it…
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED IS AN ORDER TO GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULDNOT NEED TO GO BEFORE THE COURT EXCEPT TO PASS SENTENCE ON POLITICIANS WHO TRY TO INFRINGE ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
NOPE! COWARDICE and STATISM will rule the day!
No they won't. They'll hide and claim that the petition has to go thru the regular channels.Which is an ENDLESS merry-Go-Round.
RUclips censored my comment!
Yet the porno spambots invade every video and short. 😡
I live in Colorado. We are heading that way too ! Not good !
Never should have legalized weed
The states and local governments explicitly do not have the right or jurisdiction to enforce anything having to do with weapons or the use or carry of weapons. That all falls under federal jurisdiction because that is a federally enumerated right and federal law. Allowing state and local governments to change and modify our rights and forcing citizens to assert their rights in court costing 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars, jail time or even costing their lives to do so is not legal. It is criminal. In order for the Constitution to be law and for the bill of rights to be law, they must be congruent on every square inch of US owned territory. PERIOD.
I hope one case is taken by SCOTUS, it would settle the debate on AWBs.
They did in Heller and Bruen.
These impaired contracts violate their State Constitutions, void & without force.
Shall Not Be Infringed!!
The SCOTUS needs to take the Illinois cases up since it will also bring magazine bans into the case.
CT needs to have there "ruling" challenged
Yes but nobody here will overturn . If the Supreme Court just does it CT will have to give them back too . Mags and ars. We want it national
@Jelectric33 oh I know. Tomorrow is due date for all reg of assault weapons. First I heard of it. Guess I'll be on the non comply list....
@@ridinlow01It's called a "hit list".
@@teresamoore15 I feel like they already have a hit list. Anytime we purchased, we had to call and verify the cereal wasn't stolen, so I feel like they already got a list of everything we have
If it's already registered you may as well get the "assault" certificate
Will it make a difference? These states are already ignoring Heller and Bruen. Why would they uphold what the Supreme Court says about this?
“When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.” Thomas Jefferson
What happens if a state just ignores the Supreme Court’s ruling?
Thanks Jared. I’m hailing from Connecticut. I’m also a plaintiff in a very similar case there too. It’s time SCOTUS takes up these so called AWB and MCB cases.
The 2nd Amendment says what it says. Every gun law, restriction or regulation that came after is extra-judicial. This means illegal.
As a Marylander, I hope the supreme court takes up these cases. The Maryland government has seriously overstepped its bounds.These gun laws we have are unconstitutional bills that the Maryland State government pretends are laws. No bill spends any time of its life as a law if it is in conflict with a higher law. This is what Chief Justice Marshall found in 1803 in Marbury vs. Madison. The supreme court needs tell the State of Maryland it can't ban weapons from anybody who isn't already serving time as a convicted criminal. The only exception to the 2nd amendment is the 13th amendment. Otherwise, it is absolute.
The State of Washington upheld their magazine ban.
Not yet. Circuit court judge found it unconstitutional and tried to end it, and what amounts to a clerk in the WA SC issued an injunction keeping it in place until the SC can rule. Nonsense? yes. Will the WA SC find in favor of banning? Probably. If the IL ban gets struck down before the WA SC rules, that may dissuade the WA SC from making themselves look stupid.
The state of Washington is committing High Treason insurrecting against the constitution of the united states.
@@jbirkins I'm here in shitehole corrupt WA, and I thought I already read WA supreme court upheld the ban. So many guns can't be sold here due to that BS ban and I'd like to see it gone. I thought it was headed to SCOTUS. But we'll see.
So why do we allow these unconstitutional laws on us the people ?
Why... Is politicking over our rights even a thing ?
SCOTUS only takes 70-90 cases per year.
40 years I Have been waiting for this, I hope Scotus will take at least one case up.
SCOTUS needs to!
My finger is machine-gun like...ban all fingers. 7th circuit is a violation
I hope so badly they take up one of these cases because here in Illinois it’s out of control.
Never trust any court.
Thank you, brother.
Thank you Jared
Thank You Jared 👍😎👍
AGAIN! MY comment was BLOCKED!
It's happened to me too. The speech nannies fear speaking truth.
Join the club. My comments have often disappeared even after receiving replies. When that doesn't work because I often go back and repost, I receive a 24 hour no comment time-out. I am very careful about how I say things but of course RUclips doesn't have to let you know why. 👍❤️🇺🇲 FJB
Welcome to the shadows my friend!
There's no way the Supreme Court is going to take this case.
So much for freedom of speech, the algorithm is built to just that, it's AI AT WORK... Cain't stand dictators,,,,,
Thanks, Jared!
Thank you
If I remember correctly the Maryland case( Bianchi v Brown) and a California case (Duncan v Bonta) were remanded back to circuit courts to be reheard in light of Bruen. These cases need to be heard by the SCOTUS as the circuits flipped the middle finger at SCOTUS for the Bruen decision.
Thanks Jared
I just wanted to thank you for keeping us updated and in the know…..you had told Alabama that we had gun control bills that we needed to call about…..I did so! Thanks for the heads up!!
It could just take up the NFA and be done with all of this nonsense forever
Thank you for keeping Illinois gun news 'active' in the public conscience. We're really hurting in The People's Republik of Illinois, Jared, so your help is really appreciated.
Machine guns are not banned, you have to pay a tax to have them.
which is also unconstitutional
Yes, money makes everything safer. If it can't be taxed, gov't says it's too dangerous.
@frazeeken
Okay; voting isn't banned either. Are you all right with paying a tax to vote?
Was stating that since machine guns are not banned that being machine gun like can't be a reason for banning
Which is unconstitutional therefore illegal in violation of the 9th amendment enumeration clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1,14th amendment section 1,2nd amendment.
Another great program my friend. be well.
Spot on.
That's a sweet sale at sportsman guide! Thanks!
With so many cases, surely, they will take one and bundle the rest into the final ruling.
29 States have also filed amicus briefs for Illinois saying that the supreme court should take these cases up. We also have a case in the southern district that the judge said will be on the merits this time. (he’s the one who gave the injunction) And that will be in June.
Don't forget Colorado right now...
Cuckorado. Get your shit before Aug 1. They just keep piling it on, started in Sept 2013. We will make it through this as well. Stay safe!
Blessed Sunday to you.
This is an easy question. "Did they Use a Weapon that is readily aviallable"? They know that that it is, and thus "Protected". They Fear it....
Bruen precludes using today’s “Public safety” excuse to ban Weapons.
Keep up the good work !!!!!!
These people will not stop violating your rights untill there are serious consequences for doing so.
I'm sending to you Jared!
Let's hope they pick it up and render the correct decision!! Busting those algorithms!!
If they don't take these cases up, which violate their recent decision, then they are doing we the people an injustice. At this point, they become a liability to we the people.
Hornady can pound sand. I have not forgotten.
They we punt again. I have little faith in them. Have to keep our fingers crossed.
Sportsman's guide turns over their records to ATF and FBI
Great content
Good vid! 👍
There doesn't have to be "windows of opportunity" for anti-freedom groups to file suit. Filing lawsuits is job security for their PAC's.
All 50 states and territory should be allowed to exercise their 2nd Amendment gun rights including ownership of an AR-15 or AOW with standard capacity magazine
Gun Gag 5?!? That sounds like that one night I spent in a very, very strange nightclub.
Are there going to continuously do everything in their power to infringe on our rights...
Remember the Poptart? Was that machinegun like?
This is long overdue.
Love ya, man. Been on this channel for a long time. Also tried my first Blackout coffee (instant). Used two packets instead of one, and it was great. Might have to buy myself another bottle of Kahlua for it! (I'm retired so no more alcohol/drug testing for me! And I had to sell my car, so...).
No consequences it won’t stop !