Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring the video. If you want to set up your own website (and get a discount while doing it), hit this link for more info: www.squarespace.com/skillup
@@igniii3348 what I meant, since you don't seem to read between the lines, was that ubigames tend to lose value faster than any others triple A games. They churn too much of them too fast... They are rapidly put in the sale bin.
I think you mispoke. I think you mean never buy a ubisoft game at all. Ill NEVER buy a ubisoft or EA game and if you do YOU are the cancer killing gaming.
@@kleberson777 They're all pretty flawed and bad imo. People glossed on them because of the impressive graphics. The only fun activity the franchise ever had were the ship battles in Black Flag, but even that couldn't rise the game above mediocrity for me. I remember getting so bored with AC3 I actually stopped playing and did my calculus homework for college instead.
I liked the story in the Ezio games and AC1 but the combat is a bit too easy apart from Revelations. Black Flag was fun but the story was pretty dull. I haven’t even bothered with the series after Black Flag
One thing I hate about the new assassins creeds is the endless amount of markers. I’m not sure if it’s just me, but the compulsion to collect them to take them off the map is too strong. It’s what I spend most of the time doing. Doesn’t help that some of them are underground with unclear entrance paths
@@Mr44andMore yea, for one they aren’t present on the map so there isn’t that compulsion to collect them. They’re also all located in a far smaller space. With odyssey though the map is insanely huge and all of the question marks are totally visible. What’s worse is often those question marks are located underground with no obvious means to reach them. It’s definitely far worse or people wouldn’t have commented on it
Exactly. When Ralph came out with his first impressions review on this game, I was on the fence and was thinking to myself "Give it time, Ralph. Give it time. Ubisoft will eventually show their true colours". And bam. Also after that disgraceful release for the Sands of Time remake, Ubisoft can go screw themselves. I was looking forward to seeing the Prince of Persia franchise get at least one remake...and then I was immediately heartbroken by that half-assed "remake".
Ngl I’m a completion to and it took me 70+ hours to 100% ac origins, after that I swore I’m never buying another ac game after origins again “at least the rpg ones”. I’ll wait till they go back to their unity and brotherhood style of gameplay
@@kingcrimson1222 I'll be surprised if they go back to the roots because the RPG setting has giving them a great excuse to be able to sell so much microtransactions in the helix store
@@skandas2281 This is only because of the setting since God of war and the end of the vikings show there's been massive growth in people interested in vikings, Ubisoft have cleverly released it during this time this is why the sales are high because people want to play a viking fantasy game and AC valhalla is the only game available that let's you do this 🤷♂️
First people complain that the OG assassin creed games was getting old and that it was just ....assassinate this person assassinate that person on repeat game after game ... and when they actually do something different ...people still complain lol...... it’s similar to the fast furious movies argument
@@tyreesetoomer13 you know i could give you that point, it's a good game and all, but the problem is that it's just doesn't have the Essence of assassins creed, by this point Ubisoft should just end AC and begin a new one, these are not bad games but the concept of AC is just so low, like FS it began with races and that, then after some movie a random brother that we never heard about comes in, sure the movie could be entertaining but the concept of what was FS is lost
Crazy that I put 167 hours into elden ring and instead of wondering when it would end, I was getting sad that my journey was ending. Insane how map design, gameplay loops, etc can affect enjoyment of a game that much
@@liszt646 kinda of a stupid assumption to make but okay, more likely it just became boring for me bc there was little to no story motivation for me and I had already gotten the weapons and armor I wanted. Got boring after that.
@@ryno2376 it weird causce my cousin and his friends think that this game is the best in the series , he thinks it better than the 2 game causce it has better graphics
@@Mobt204 They are probably kids who haven't played the original games or good games in general. There are so many games which are much better than this which offer the same gameplay.
@@someguy315 ok make scence but like vallhla even if it new it still sucks causce it story is terrible and it combat and stealth is a massive downgrade
“I spent 50 years on Avengers” Dear God, this man made up the entire remaining playerbase of that game Edit: I refuse to change my typo just continue pissing people off in the replies
It really isin't that bad. It was actually fun, the problem with avengers is that there's fuck all in it. I mean really i dont see any other avengers games like that
@@theduck3876 I agree with about avengers I wasn't going to get it but I wanted something to play and I like comics so it was a good stop gap until cyberpunk came out 🤣🙄 but I've stopped playing until they drop the new characters but the gear grind only fun for a bit.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but so far I like the game. He is right took me 8 hours to complete the introduction quests, and 100% the side items in the first area.
I felt like that all the way back after AC2. Kinda good to see that i was ahead of the curve, because even if it was one of the better AC's it is still one of the least stimulating experiences i've ever had. It's hard to describe, but Ubisoft games are pretty often not entertaining, but rather just destracting. Once the distraction is over you woonder where the time went and are left feeling nothing, but a little bit closer to death.
@@loganwebb5086 most reviews are solid. If were being honest, Skill Up isnt a big open world guy, so best not to take his word as law here, still appreciate his opinions though.
Meh, exploration on this game is top notch compared to Ghost. But Ghost has that Sony polish on it that makes it special. If only Ubisoft invests more on their time fixing small bugs that breaks immersion, it might be up to that Sony polish.
Yes! This is exactly how I felt. It's crazy how I finished the quest chain with Sigurd because it felt urgent, and then the game forced me into every region of the map to do boring side content (except it wasn't side content) to finally CIRCLE BACK to Sigurd for the finale. The pacing is atrocious and the gameplay loop simply does not hold up. It feels like playing a product to pass time, not to enjoy it.
I know right? It's hilarious. I just completed the Fulke mission after cashing in all of the alliances and finally rescuing Sigurd and what do I get? LMAO the blacksmith went to find a wife GO THERE EIVOR. What even IS this pace?!
This was my exact experience! I finally finished the game after around 100 hours (due to sidetracking and stupid limited time seasonal events in a single player game), and for about 30 of those hours I was unaware that i had basically already finished the main plot with Sigurd and was just being forced to do chores before i was arbitrarily allowed to see how the main plot ended. It was like they looked at how AC2 prevented you from seeing the finale until you collected every codex page and decided to do that again but make it 100 times more frustrating and boring
the last assassins creed i played was black flag, and that came out almost 7 years ago which is crazy to think about, though i have yet to play any of the other ones that were released after that. i recently bought valhalla and have only been playing it for a few hours, and i can say that it is exceptionally better than black flag. keep in mind that i have not played odyssey so i cannot compare the two, but from my experience, i can truthfully say that investing within valhalla was worth it. obviously, that's just my opinion, and this video is biased, but i would say that there is a bit too much criticism.
Outside of jimquistion and some Reddit threads, this is the first I’ve seen other people bring up the weird rape cult at Ubisoft. Idk if that’s me being blind but it’s not a good feeling either way.
It has never worked and will never work, strange how Witcher had a quarter of the budget of Valhalla but yet but managed to do something ubisoft could never touch
Like hell they want to make a game like The Witcher. They don't even want to make a game, as evidently seen here. They just want to print money by regurgitating the same Formula over and over.
I just finished and felt the exact same. I'm an inveterate completionist and this game was like torture to me and felt it completely disrespected my time. I agree with you entirely, so much filler but the potential for something much better to have been carved out of all the flab. Ah the positive thing is that it's made me give up on the Assassin's Creed franchise at long last so there is that.
I feel you brother, oh my God, I completely do. Just how CA did me, never touching anything they produce even if I never ever get to play any grand strategy game again.
You're just now giving AC the boot? I couldn't even play Syndicate. I put a couple hours into Origins and the bloat was overwhelming. I just can't play this shit anymore.
Not if u are deep in the AC lore, the 3 games Origins, odessey and Valhalla are origin stories after all However u could also say that about ac4 black flag as you're not an assassin until the end of the game, and Ac Rouge where ur playing a templar
@@MarkFilipAnthony the only one that is 100% apart of the AC franchise is AC Origins. The ones after do not matter at all to the story, you’d be better off not knowing it.
@@ethanking640 your main weapon in odyssey is a spear made by the ancient race going all the way back to AC2 and is made from the same stuff as the apple of Eden then you learn the truth behind Atlantis.
@@MrOrangeSmash but does that change anything previously known in the series except cheapen the apples? Because I don't even need to play the game to know by the way you describe it that it is an afterthought therefore wholly irrelevant.
I got about 60 hours into this and then checked the map and saw how MUCH I had left and just put it down. Fun concept, pretty graphic, I like Eivor and the DLCs but oh my god
EDIT: If you enjoyed this game, that's okay! This comment here was just my opinion back then, agreeing with SkillUp's review. Some people got offended by it, but don't take it personal, please. - There is no weight on this game's combat and movement, you feel like you're just hitting NPCs HP bars. - The world is pretty, but it feels empty. - The NPCs are all generic with the same faces and dialogues. Sometimes I see the same NPC models side by side doing the same animations. - The missions are unending and just bad, feels like you're doing the same thing for 70 hours. Always that "talk > scan > kill" or follow someone. - No motivation to keep going through the story, no real objective. Everybody hates you when you reach a new ally region, you do some missions, and then suddenly everybody loves you. Repeat this for like thirteen times. - Like you said, the equipment you find throughout the world is boring. And the "secret" places to find them always follow the same pattern. - No motivation to spend the silver coins you get, because the vendors are not interesting at all and they sell the same things. After almost a year since I bought it (full price), after many times I've given up because I was too bored, I've finished it. I've finished the main story because I always want to prepare for the next AC title. It wasn't worth it, not even close. One of the worst and meaningless games that I've ever played for sure. I should've watched your video before.
I totally agree. I'm just 40 hours in and completed 3 alliance, and I am nowhere close to finishing. It just becoming a drag. I struggled with Odyssey but managed to finish and platinum within 60/70 hours. But this is next level. Hella repetitive. Was hyped at the beginning for this game. But the length of this game is killing me. I think I'm done. I'll think twice about purchasing an AC game.
@@Filthypagan right?? If I decide I am not having fun with a game it’s off my hard drive in the same minute I say that too myself. People don’t even respect their own time it’s crazy.
@BabbitXP if it’s not enjoyable absolutely. Gaming is something I do for fun and I have limited time to do it, I’m definitely not gonna spend that time playing something that’s not grabbing me and making me want to play more.
This game, like Odyssey, suffers from "It shouldn't have been an AC game" syndrome. Another really cool idea ruined by the franchise it was forced into.
I remember talking to a friend about the topic, I think they should just consider making a new IP that’s also based in historical periods, especially with the virtual tour section they do now. When “Assassin’s Creed” is slapped onto part of the title it’s going to have high expectations from its more successful predecessors. Now if they gave it a different title and did some changes on mechanics it would at least be seen with more open-minded expectations and curiosity.
After being in origins, odyssey and valhalla. We should accept that these ideas are the identity of 20% of the assassins creed games/franchise. They tried to revamp it, and perhaps it was not a hit with some. I have been enjoying the hell out of valhalla, and find the characters very interesting.
I agree and it's so disheartening when you realize that this is a chronic issue nearly all triple A studio's share within the industry it's like they aren't even trying anymore honestly and if I had to decide what mediums of entertainment made the most of this flaming Pig shit of a year it would be The Anime industry /manga industry for gaming we've had some highlights but nothing super phenomenal really....just 💯🔥🐖💩 all the way unfortunately.
You can make any game 50 hours long if you just copy/paste all missions, which they did here with the entire campaign, is ok to have a 10/20 hours or a 60 hours game as long as it delivers an enjoyable experience, but Valhalla is just boring as hel
i dont see people complain for 10-20 hrs campaigns those are fine like DOOM eternal or DMC 5. if it was short like resident evil 3 or Miles than yes that is something to complain about.
@@GrippeeTV Yeah how dare they make a long game /s. Some people like long games but judgement Andys here cant stand when other people have different opinions.
@awteserhrst5h4r asdvavsrfaSfdds Literally dozen of good reviews - you sleep. One bad review - Yeah the game is shit I knew it. God youtube gamers are so obnoxious.
@@LordsUther I like long games... then the Irony games with 10h are critiziced for being too short. If he doesnt like long games review it with that in mind
It was your AC: Odyssey review that actually convinced me to buy it and why I subscribed to your channel originally. Your pros and cons were accurate, just weighted differently for me as a person. Keep it up with the honesty.
My wife TORE Odyssey up, over 100 hours and generally loved everything BUT the DLC content. Valhalla she played for about half a day and just turned it off, saying "this game is boring. Trade it." I was shocked, but she and I watched this video and she said, "yep, pretty much all of the above were already telegraphing to me. I'm going to play something else." Oof.
I thought Odyssey is better too. The mythical nature of the game makes it more fun (fighting lions was beyond fun). Also the broken up islands made Greece feel like different regions, England on the other hand is one giant landmass that feels mostly the same.
@@mentos93 but skillup is wrong. The combat is fun and can be punishing when you turn up the difficulty. You’re a Viking not an assassin. The acting in this game has been one of the best and the characters show more emotion than in odyssey. Repetitive gameplay of course but.... look at Spider-Man miles morales the games over in 8 hours. 10 hours tops and no reason to play it again. I rather have a game like assassins creed that I can play and enjoy over a long period. The lore and the mysteries in the game are interesting. I have 60 hours in just running around and getting myself killed in harder areas way above my pay grade. Raiding could have been better. More difficult and maybe an option on you balancing areas or else the enemy could have regained footing. You’d have to raid again. I actually enjoyed odyssey/origin loot over Valhalla’s but I can see what they were going for.
Every assassin creed game is about assasination and their creed you just hate it because they had less stealth and the hood. Assassin creed origin = they tell us to assassin/kill all cult (templar) member that exist in egypt and how The creed is born and their first name is The Hidden One Assassi creed Odyssey = tell us to assassin/kill all the cult member (templar) that exist in roman and why the creed protect all the eden pieces. Its evolving from Assassin Creed Vs Templar to The Hidden One vs Cult. It always be like that but this time with larger map,more items. I always enjoy it lol but i respect you opinion because from AC origin-valhalla it always hurt my neck because i love exploring the map and thats kinda suck
I've played Valhalla for over 40 hours and I've only made it halfway through the game. They game felt like it would take an eternity to finish so I gave up and deleted the game from my Xbox cause it was only wasting space. It's been 6 months now and I still have not found the courage to finish it
Everything you said here about janky combat, generic missions, and no payoff, pretty much applies to "Watch Dog Legion" as well. Its thankfully not as long, but I dont doubt its as generic, that's Ubisoft for ya
Modern "AAA" titles have reached this level, where every aspect of them is just meh. They lack both scope and depth, that would make them interesting. Open world, even with generic elements, could be interesting, if there is enough depth to this game. Like loot or extended character development system. If those generic features are arranged in a very good way. None of it is present in games like Valhalla and Legion. They are big, but utterly shallow, lacking enough content for enjoyable gameplay loop, where you can go from activity 1 to activity 2...to activity 37, keeping player interested, because there is so many different things to do(and they are not mandatory) and any of them making impact on gameplay in some shape or form. What we see with those games is developers starting to reach rock bottom of practice that has been in place for last 10 years or so, where games have been gradually watered down(Fallout franchise is a perfect example), to appeal to largest audience possible, resulting in none of those games having anything that would make them even remotely special, not to mention unique. You just repeat same extremely limited number of activities, for very little reward or impact on anything. Grind is no longer tool for reaching certain goals, it is all that those games have. Very little substance.
@@sharkh20 Valhalla was what I expected and not enjoyable at all. I liked Origins, Odyseey was a downgrade, and somehow this is WORSE. Inconsistent framerates, bugs and glitches littered everywhere, boring asf features that put me to sleep WATCHING them (can only imagine what it'd be like playing it; gonna leave in a coma). The janky, stiff, 15 fps combat was just an overall deal-breaker for me though. Not even about to touch this game.
Someone once said to me Ubisoft design is like Mexican fast food, you can order a burrito, taco or a enchilada, but at the end the ingredients are all the same and the only difference is how it's served.
Hell, I’ve put 200 into it and still have to go back at least once a week to just experience the amazing world they built...and find some secrets. Finally caught the Vampire in Saint Denis lol.
plus he praises WD: L when theres very little to do in it vs this game. I understand this game has bugs and should have been a few months more delayed but choosing WD: L over this is very odd.
@Jobs .com Bro just wandering around ancient Greece is enough for me to invest in a few more hours. the accuracy and level of detail in Athens is astonishing. Riding your horse around Makedonia and stumbling on ancient sites is just 😍... that's why i played the shit out of Origins... I've played 60h so far in odyssey and didn't finish like 50% of the game according to uplay lmao
Pro tip for buying Ubisoft games: Don't look forward to them? Buy them like 2 years after release for like ten bucks when you're just looking for a new game to burn time on. Like when you just wanna simulate productivity. Here's an open world, here's all the collectables on the map, here's easy flashy combat, probably won't stop having fun till 20-40 hours. Why expect anything better from Ubisoft? Their last game I bought at full price was Far Cry 3. Then they clearly just started following the same formula for all their games.
Not really. Complains game is to easy but plays it on normal difficulty. I mean how can u take that review serious. Seems like all the stuff he complains about is stuff he didn't figure out how to do in the game. Poor review to be honest.
@@aandlwireless just because you’re an AC fanboy who loves Valhalla doesn’t mean SkillUp’s review is bad. I bet if he loved the game you would be saying “what a great review.” Good review to be honest.
If normal feels easy then you are too experienced for normal it's not that crazy. Especially since some people been playing these games since 2007 like we've definitely mastered being an assassin by now.
@@aandlwireless If a game offers different difficulties then normal should be the most balanced. By your stupid arguments every game should be like Dark Souls, insanely difficult by default with no way to change difficulties.
@@aandlwireless Disagree. There should still be some level of difficulty in Normal. Majority of people go into games on the game's normal difficulty. If there isn't at least some challenge to every difficulty, that's a major problem. A game needs a challenge to overcome. That is one of the core fundamentals to any game design. If there is no challenge. And if a game is too easy. Then what are you actually getting out of what you're doing? If a character talks of overcoming a difficult threat in any given game, how can the audience relate to it at all? If it was piss easy you would feel no resolve. No accomplishment. The reason a game is a game is in it's ability to relate your actions to what is going on in that world. The character says it was a slow, hard fought victory. The player feels like it was a walk in the park. It lacks impact and creates a dissonance between the player and the game. Not allowing you to relate to these characters in turn or feel deeply involved in the world. Game's need some level of challenge to every difficulty given. And if normal, arguably the most picked game difficulty, is really easy, you think about how many experiences that might ruin? Sure you can change difficulty but playing it on the normal difficulty, the most standard and most picked difficulty in gaming is really essential to reviewing a gaming experience, as it is accustomed for a large majority of people to relate to, as they will play through on normal. That is why this review is absolutely fair and wonderfully professional. His complaints are completely justified. And his review is great. I am a game design student at Media Design School. Fresh, just finished my first year. But I've learnt an awful lot. Including the fact that challenge is one of the most core fundamentals to making a good game. Have a good day Mr. Looby
ACG and other reviewers not finishing the game is why the reviews are so different from Skillups. No shit you're gonna look at a game highly if you only play 15-20 hours of a 60 hour game, how do you even rate the story when you haven't reached the finale. Do most people even finish the AC games?
I get that, but also you can look at how many hours before you got bored v what you paid for it, with these open world Ubi games it's usually many hours and worth the purchase price.
@@Muslimman570 That's what I always feel about this guy, not an objective critique just (this is boring because it's long and because it's a job and I don't like to work). It feels shallow.
Yeah I don't know what happened here, odyssey's wasn't the best but my God they are 1000x times better than a lot of Valhalla's animations. I have no clue how they went backwards
Ubisoft just needs to get back to their roots and put in a main protagonist. Remove the male femal protagonist altogether and work on a character you'll be invested in by relating to his story. Origins was good. Odyssey and Valhalla was a mess
That and magically shrinking weapons. The people calling you she when you're clearly a man. The women with the bodies of men. The fact that apparently half of England in the 800s were 10 feet tall giants. The studded leather armor and furs. The lack of proper viking tactics. The use of terminology that did not exist yet. The shit tier voice acting. And not to mention the horrible combat system they've been using of late. Button mashing tedious mind numbing laziness. Basically Destiny in singleplayer form. Assassins creed is truly a dumpsterfire these days. So glad I pirated it. Ubi doesn't deserve my money.
@@nwah4707 As far as I remember old AC combat wasn't glorious as well, and in fact was just a shitty button mashing. Character feels godly, devoiding that combat challenge experience. It was just parry then one-hit.
Because monster Hunter is fun it has soul in it everything about it is amazing playing online fighting monsters having cool moments AC just doesn’t have that
Just now, I completed ghost of Tsushima for the 4th time and I’m already considering playing it over again. When you make a game with the love for making games, you get a great fucking game.
@@user-yg8jf1zk9e honestly, without being hyperbolic, it’s pretty damn good. Not perfect but considering everything else that’s out there right now, it’s the best game I’ve played in awhile. The combat, by far, is the highlight for me.
That just sounds retarded and stupid, it came out in July and you've played 4 times. There's literally only the story and that's it, it's like watching a movie on repeat, I get it if the game was cyberpunk but it's a linear story game with little to no decision making parts and the outcome is mostly the same, you just sound bored
@@MrJackrussell12 lol alright man, chillll. It’s a pretty good story, a little cliche but hey, no micro transactions or level gating. The combat is simple but oddly satisfying on lethal. The side quests characters aren’t just one and done. The game looks more like a painting and gives you a lot time to admire it. For me, it was a breath of fresh air so with the little time I had after work days, I was more then happy to experience it over and over again. Maybe try it or don’t. Idk. You do you man.
@@Hamppdur i dont get it how did you not get bored? I already felt the combat was too repetitive and got bored after act II on my first playthrough (90% of my skilltree was already filled by end of act I). But you somehow managed to play GoT for 4 playthroughs... Theres no way i could do that even if someone pays me lol
not gonna lie when you said "some great fan service right here" i rolled my eyes. hearing that the Assassins creed in a Assassins creed game has been demoted to fan service tier is just sad
@@thesigmamale2134 So? I just bought it because it's a viking game. I liked black flag, and origins too a lot! But odyssee no!! I still have the game and want to just give it away
U failed to mention the ever so fun and totally not broken rock building simulator. Really pulled this game together and truly immersed me into this magical world.
I care more about side characters in The Witcher than I do about main characters in AC games. I remember and care more about the Bloody Baron than I do about Alexios or Bayek.
The lady missing her frying pan, the sister of the slain wife of a werewolf by the husband’s own hands, meeting Letho again, the tower outta nowhere, there are so many memorable quests that a player could have just skipped.
Finally after months of playing this, countless breaks, after more than 125 hours, I have finally finished the game lol This might be my last AC game, I’m done with these mindless repetitive endless games.
@@travisgraham3104 😂 not exactly, I’m a completionist so I had to finish it. There are roughly 50 hours of gameplay where I had to push myself to play through. So I’d say I enjoyed it 60% of the time. Not to mention, I took many weeks off where I didn’t even touch it just because I was so bored with it. If you can push through of that 50-60 hours of repetitive gameplay, go for it.
I think another part that upset me about this was that you are literally the second in command and are told to go make alliances with the surrounding territories. That means you have to obviously be away from the main camp. Yet your allies (one in particular) gets butt-hurt that you're always away from camp. But the few times you are called on to settle issues in the camp, he's mad at you for that too saying you're getting too comfy on the throne. Like .... what?
I just finished after 180 hours and that was just the base game. I recall watching this review 3 years ago and yup, spot on. I mean spot on Ralph. The cut scenes are boring and the game grated on me the more I played. Still need to do the DLC.
I have a friend who has a disability called Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome that makes it so she's not able to do a lot of physical exploration outside her room. She's played through Odyssey twice and is on her third playthrough of The Witcher 3. This seems like the perfect game for her.
@@Ornoob- The point is most people do not feel Assassin's Creed games come anywhere near Ghost of Tsushima's quality. I never played Assassin's Creed personally, so I'm not judging, I'm just explaining to you what the point is since you seem very confused about what people are saying.
At first I absolutely loved this game. Mistakingly, I decided that I wanted to go for the platinum trophy. Just under 140 hours later, I want my time back.
A few things I'd like to mention that really irked me in this game 1) Playing as an assassin is boring. There are maybe 5 animations total in the entire game and it's all dependent on how you are doing the assassination. And they are slow and clunky, like the combat. You had like half a dozen in Odyssey and got rid of them for what? 2) The entire stun attack mechanic is probably the worst thing to happen to AC combat. Breaks the flow where you do the same animation of killing someone with whatever weapon THEY are using, not your own cool looking weapon. 3) Dual wielding weapons is lame. You barely use the other weapon, plus the way they designed for you to be able to switch to the other weapon is something you have to unlock in their nightmare of a skill tree. Most of those skills are either minimally useful or flat out useless.
It's excellent don't fall for this bs, that's coming from someone that fell off Odyssey after 20 hours and I hated Orgins, already put almost 30 hours into it.
I miss the days when the maps weren't so big and there was actual interesting characters that tied in to the modern day story. Everything from the Ezio to Black Flag I would say was the best of the series. Now its turned into a bootleg grindfest where stealth is not even needed anymore. Nothing happens in the modern day story and they just keep shitting out a game each year. Back in the Desmond days it felt like we were reaching a conclusion of the story now we got nothing.
I agree. This is just my personal opinion, but ACIII was my personal favorite. I absolutely loved exploring colonial America and getting caught up in the Revolutionary War. I was just blown away. Black Flag had a very similar feel and was remarkable in its own right, although both were a bit grindy IMO. I got so immersed in those games. Everything felt “grounded” in terms of history, details and battles. I felt that my in-game victories were well earned and not just inevitable. I feel like magical weapons, mythical creatures, riding around on a horse sized wolf, and super exaggerated cosmetics and armor only get further away from what made the previous ones great. Edit: I want to clarify that I understand these games have and always have had certain fantasy and unrealistic elements to them. It’s difficult to put into writing what I’m talking about. I think we’d all agree that nothing is ever black and white and it’s not like any given game is either historically accurate or not. There’s a huge range of “grey area” in regards to the subject accuracy since a game that was 100% historically accurate would be extremely boring, no matter the genre. I remember in 2018 when I was expressing my disappointment at the lack of historical accuracy in BFV; I got so much criticism with statements like “Battlefield has never been historically accurate! If you don’t like ABC, then what about XYZ in previous games!?” I feel like comments like that deliberately misinterpret and distract from the issue by pretending there’s never been an appropriate range of historical accuracy in games that have been well received. Everyone knows, not any single game is 100% accurate and we all know that liberties have to be taken to ensure fun and compelling gameplay. But I think anyone who has been gaming long enough understands that there’s an unofficial range of what the gaming community would consider a historical accuracy focus. The best current examples I can give are the differences between BV1 and BFV. Both games have elements of their respective wars that are anything but historically accurate. But anyone who has more than a budding interest in 20th Century warfare and technology will agree, that BFV took waaay more liberty with their interpretation. To those who don’t know much about the conflicts or just don’t care, it may not be noticed, but it was certainly the largest departure from historical accuracy in terms of weapon, vehicle, equipment and cosmetic accuracy for the battles and settings within the game. Another example is Red Dead Dead Redemption 2. I’m currently playing it on PC and love every second. It’s not 100% accurate to the period but is definitely within what the grand majority of gamers would consider historically accurate for the late 1890’s in the U.S.. The game is extremely immersive and a joy to explore, in my opinion, because of this. Everyone’s opinions are valid.
@@nateweter4012 Black Flag was my favorite. AC3 SHOULD have been my favorite, but every aspect of AC3 that was unique to the revolutionary war was just a cheap gimmick, and I hated that. I was super looking for to interrupting some line battles, and having some skirmishes with allies. Instead line battles were a game of hide and seek behind cover then sneak around back. And skirmishes were you going from left to right on a horse. Also fun fact, remember the trading system? Where you'd sell pelts, and craft stuff? Selling raw materials in AC3 was the best profit. I even crafted the cannons and such, which actually took awhile to make. And the net gain was literally less than if I just sold the materials separately. Why would you do this!?
I think I enjoyed AC1 to Origins. I liked the idea of them testing the waters with RPG for Origins and the story wasn't as bad, Odyssey was just a general grindfest; for quests, armor, and to find the entire Cult. (This guy knows where the cult is but you have to help him liberate his island by helping all the villagers plus fighting for Athens in the fight as well as travelling 10000 miles to talk to his brother just to deliver a pot back to him)
@@caljackal6139 Yah I wasn't a fan of Syndicate and didn't really like that Origins tried to turn it into a witcher hybrid but at least Origins tried to tell the origin story of the Assassin's. When Odyssey came out that's when I knew I was officially done with the series....Unity was the last Ac game I felt comfortable purchasing but I honestly think Black Flag was the last good AC game. When they killed Desmond I didn't think much of it, but now I truly feel like that was the domino effect that ruined the series
Viking's don't do stealth. They fight their enemies head on and furiously. Ubisoft doesn't get that at all. If they want to do stealth so badly, make a AC game set in Japan where you play as a ninja.
@@dantemcmillan6337 Way back when they contemplated doing Japan but thought it was a boring setting. Now Ghost of Tsushima is out, it's a very similar game and is a smash hit.
AC odyssey was AMAZING. Idc what people say. The world building, the choices you make, the people, setting, everything was unique and intriguing to explore. Valhalla is SO FRIGGIN BORING. World looks the same every where. No character that stands out. Story is flat out boring and too long to follow.
For anyone that’s just getting into AC. There was a time when we can Counter an attack and then Chain attack to multiple enemies. No skills and abilities. Just straight up brutal Stab and cuts.
And it was the most boring gameplay ever. Spamming counter-attacks every single fight is the definition of repetitive and also the reason why the majority of the people (including me) stopped playing Assassin's Creed games. Origins literally revived a dying franchise by introducing the new combat (and stealth) system. I would never play an AC game again if they returned to the old format. However, I think Unity was pretty cool (aside from annoying gunners that one shot you)
@@TheChodex I hear you on the old combat, the endless counter attacks got old. Ghost of Tsushima really set the new standard for me for hand to hand combat, brutal and precise, easy enough to take guys down that you felt powerful, but dangerous enough that you'd die easily if you lost focus. I loved how defensive enemies were, but when you timed it right and got through their defense, they dropped easily and satisfyingly. I was really hoping for Valhalla to build on something similar, but looks like they didn't
@@TheChodex i think you’re missing the point. Yes combat wasn’t as developed back then but that’s mainly due to the purpose of the game being ASSASSINS. Play the game however you please but don’t forget it’s meant to be played stealthy
15 Hours in AC Valhalla and… No, im done. I cannot continue, I even put everything on Easy to make it less Stressful and that didn’t help. Also because i was on PC i used an Inventory Editor to get all the Boosters and Store Items and yet i didn’t feel satisfied
After playing tsushima, these games are essentially impossible to play. And I used to love AC, once upon a time they were actually my favorite series. After I got this game, I realized it was just reskinned odyssey and origins an hour in and now regret the money I spent.
*Song for this year* Its the devils way now, theres no way out, you can scream you can shout, It is too late now because you have not been paying attention...
Hey man I was so close to getting this game, because there are so many reviewers who only praise this game...not a single one pointed the things out you did...thanks for saving me a lot of time and struggle...
I swear is because ubisoft is scared if it don't have the assassin's creed name they can't sell it they should have just did a viking game with no assassin stuff
Nobody would buy their game if they don't put AC title on their games. Their games at mediocre at best and the fanboys of the series are only making them money
I'm still waiting for my damn non AC branded Pirates of the Caribbean game from Ubisoft ever since Black Flag. Skull and Bones is not what most Black Flag fans wanted. If it ever comes out anyway.
Well to be honest he might have his part to play in the elongating of games. And the funniest thing is he sees the same problem as games are getting too long, but reflection that he might be the problem with his "Only four hours!!!"? nope. There is no obejctive right length of a game.
I felt this way about Odyssey. Wonderful fun for the first 20 hours, then 30 additional hours of slogging, leading up to an unsatisfying, ridiculous ending
When i started playing odyssey i wanted to get to all the question marks i played for over 100 hours before giving up and in the end i just wanted to get it over with .
That's why I never liked open world games, they have too much irrelevant and repetitive filler, made by an out of touch corporation that used to be a respected game studio a long time ago. I just hope they don't screw up Cyberpunk 2077.
It's an opinion. Either play it or don't if you're basing a decision off merit. I won't be playing this or watch dogs. I'm really picky about how I spend my time playing games and don't feel the need to buy the next shiny toy. Lots of disposable income. Not as much time. So I choose wisely.
Game is made for auto-aimers with 30 PREMIUM FPS doing macro-transactions for cut content giving out their personal data and that data is being exploited by publishers to inflate and keep people in the loop. Welcome to the brave naive world. Developers of said naive world can't face the facts so they suppress, censor people. Outsource their dirty work to influencers which get high when they receive free merch. Free merch > free speech. Is your mind blown how people fall for same thing every time? It shouldn't be. Because divided, singled out individuals has no chance against organized criminal entity; corporation. Corporation is an approved scam & spy business. Their approval was obtained through manufactured consent. Corporation is not the industry of manufacturing products. Corporation is in the industry of manufacturing consent. As well Corporations [through governments] are harvesting our biometric data on global scale. So they can get to know us far better than we know ourselves, and they not just predict our feelings but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want- Be it a product as a service or politician. Check out "The Corporation", "The century of the self", "Stockholm syndrome"
Just posted similar, glad to see other people are noticing this. Even though it is funny; as "Games Urinalists" are hilariously dumb. It isn't me, you, or the others who have stated it being facetious; it is actually a bad thing and worries me. I don't want to have to have a cheat code to make a game play as it should. But, I seriously think Ubisoft did exactly that and other companies may follow suit for the good reviews out of MSM reviewers.
@@LemanRussx i dont know about syndicate, but black flag did get more difficult yet more rewarding as time went by. I mean youre an assasin main protag hero so of course youre gonna be a 1 man army bad ass. But like. On normal standing still barely taking damage while 1 enemy out of 5 actually attacks? thats FAR too easy for "normal" it usually goes: easy = no application, normal = apply the basics, hard= advanced application. If you domt have to try on normal thenn???
The only reason I play Valhalla now is to wind down from stressful times and wander through Norway. The music, the stunning views, are just so meditative. But the story was way too long to do a 2nd playthrough. and the side quests? well, I can't be bothered. and 22:00 well it's even worse when you realize that the most powerful weapon you'd want in the game, is ALREADY in your hands at the start. the fully upgraded Varin's axe is one of the best weapons in the game, so you'd go out of your way to collect gear and it would just be... useless
I’m an idiot for buying the game before watching reviews or first opinions on it 🤦🏻♂️ when you play games with great combat like ghost of tsushima, dark souls, and sekiro you immediately notice the difference.
@@m.israel2209 +1. I wasn't expecting a game this bad. This is disgustingly bad and i feel insulted. I was expecting improvement over Odyssey which i find it fine.
@@m.israel2209 Fortunately I even warned a friend of mine who wanted to buy it, to wait and have a look on reviews, gameplay, etc., well... he quickly decided to not waste money on that one.
Sometimes I find it hard to believe reviewers who say "I hate this game that I put 100 hours into." But at the same time, if someone gave a full review of a 100 hour game after just 10 hours, then they have no right to be a reviewer, putting the time into such a lengthy game is necessary for a good assessment. Thank you for pushing through as long as you could, I appreciate the effort you put in for your channel
Check your logic when you feel that way. This whole notion of "dur dur, well you played some arbitrary amount of time....dur...why would anyone do that unless they LOVE IT" makes just as much sense. Which is none. I watch movies through to the credits that I also judge to suck. I play survival games for dozens or hundreds of hours to placate friends that I think suck. Sometimes people just get into that abusive loop of time wasting. Doesn't mean a game is enjoyed because it sucks hours out of you. By that logic, the cashier at your gas station really must love that job!
@@Amrylin1337 did he really say that? I thought he just commended Skillup for pushing theough an unenjoyable experience for the sake of delivering to us a thorough review.
People may be pushing for variety of reasons. Like in hopes that things will be better down the line. Or they have nothing better to do. Or they are just bored. Hell, i sometimes play same games simply because i dont want to start a new game, as weird as it sounds. I dont want a new experience at this particular moment and this state can last for a while.
@@holysecret2 thats what I was trying to get at. If you're going to review a game, play it to the fullest extent that you can so that you have a valid reason to recommend or not recommend.
At the same time I can't entirely trust a guy that clearly doesn't like a genre but keeps trying to review them. Like, I don't mind the opinion but IMO if you're starting to do something and you already want it to end it's more likely that you'll end up hating it, especially if it takes 50+ hours. A LOT of people didn't get the whole "bloat level gating" issue with Odyssey, me included. Why? Because we never, ever, not even once had to grind to do anything in that game. If you like the RPG genre, the ARPG genre, the open world ARPG genre, that's natural progression, not grind. I just played a game on my Switch called Xenoblade Chronicles Definitive Edition and absolutely loved it but I noticed something... I played it with the same mindset I do in most rpgs/open world games, I progressed naturally through the cities and maps, meaning that I would take every side quest possible and started completing them until I felt I wanted to move on with the story. Xenoblade has like 480 side quest while Odyssey doesn't even get to half that number. The thing is, when I was at about halfway through the story in Odyssey I was already max level having to scale enemies up to my level to have fun while in Xenoblade I faced the reality that I had to level up EVEN MORE to even scratch the last boss, literally because they have a system that if you're outside a 5 level range with the opponent you miss pretty much every attack, so I had to, guess what? Grind.. You see, it's natural progression if you want to do it but it becomes grind if you're forced to do it. In other words Skill Up is being forced to play these games, it's not the first time and it won't be the last, he doesn't really like these kinds of games and after watching most of his videos, he isn't the target audience for them. The vast majority of games he plays and reviews fall in three categories. It's either a game that goes on for 20 to 40 hours, a game that can be replayed over and over again (like the rogue likes he mentioned) and multiplayer MMO-lite games. He doesn't play 100 hour JRPGs and he doesn't play 100 hour western or CRPGs. He doesn't even have a Witcher 3 review as far as I know, one of the best and most influential games of the last decade. And that's not a problem at all, it just goes back to what I said, he's not the target audience. Xenoblade Chronicles is considered one of the best JRPGs of all time and Assassin's Creed Odyssey is considered a bloated boring game. I get it, in Xenoblade the story is better, the characters are better and the writing is better but I'm talking about bloat, about grind, about boredom.
@@omarcomming722 If you dont like these types of games dont play. Some people like long worlds to explore and play. But yeah I know am asking too much logic from the average youtube commenter.
I played it for a few hours, and the moment I saw the battle system and the assassination mechanics, it felt like I got hit with a mountain of slaps. The movement is terrible, and it's just smash, smash, smash -_- . And now I can't even refund it-I'm stuck with this game! I don't know, I enjoyed Odyssey a lot more. At least the conversations weren't so dull, and the cutscene animations were way better!
been playing this on hard difficulty and the stamina thing is exact opposite for me. I do like two dodges and the stamina is depleted, swing axe twice and stamina is depleted. My biggest mistake with this game is I started playing this immediately after finishing ghost of tsushima and apart from the environmental beauty everything else with this game has felt lackluster.
Ghost of Tsushima’s combat is one of the main reasons getting through this game felt absolutely dreadful. From one of the best to one of the least enjoyable melee combat systems ever
@@gamerd8709 Sure sir, who am i to judge, its your experience. it might have indeed been boring to you. Well whatever charms your heart, have happy gaming !! Cheers.
Combat-wise, I found remapping the attack buttons from the triggers to the x, square etc made things a little more enjoyable, not much, but a little. 👍🏼
@@perseusthean6318 great game but it's more pirate of assassin, which is where it started, it's called assassins creed but assassins keep taking a back seat, it feels like they just keep making new ideas and attach the assassins creed name to make money
I bought it. I’m satisfied. If you’re an ADULT whose personality isn’t videogaming and all you do is game 1-2hrs on weekends. This is a good game. RUclips gamer nerds are killing the industry
@troll randon it really isn’t the skill tree is practically the same still has the perk skills barely even is about assassins creed spend hours to get xp to just do the main quest still have to kill a cult of people like in the last to assassins creed games everything i just said origins and Odyssey both had and Odyssey was known for being WAY to long and even added a skip game option cause no one in the community wanted to complete it the only thing i liked was odysseys Greek gods dlc and that was mainly because it was a completely different thing from assassins creed and i just like Greek mythology
@@LordBruuh you mean the story of 80% of the gaming industry thanks to the success of games like GTA, Witcher and Skyrim etc... If your problem is Ubisoft made an open world then guess what, we as the consumer asked for that many moons ago... Also fyi the game itself doesn't play/feel like odyssey at all.
@@LordBruuh Ubisoft’s open worlds aren’t necessarily the problem for me. It’s mostly that they don’t bother trying to realise the setting and how there is no world building to make it actually feel immersive or alive. So their open worlds just end up feeling like playgrounds with checklists no matter how good they are.
I love Skill Up's reviews because he articulates his thoughts and opinions really well. Personally I loved Odyssey, so I'm pretty sure I'm going to enjoy Valhalla too. Because I know how he felt about Odyssey, I'd have been more concerned if he loved Valhalla, because it would have meant the devs would have changed a lot of what appealed to me about the previous installment. Still, it's good to hear his opinions and he always is honest and fair. His review of Outer Wilds made me pick it up and I loved that game. It's refreshing to have a review channel that can make passionate statements about games without feeling the need to be dismissive of player's themselves who have differing opinions.
Yeah, I'm going pick this up I'm pretty sure I'm gonna love it but I don't find this review surprising I'm actually glad it's longer. I don't hold his opinion against him, he's one of my favourite reviewers.
Yes I agree, people are very quick to judge on his reviews because they don’t want to be disappointed. At the end of the day he played 67 hours of Valhalla and finished it, while we did not. His criticism is worth listening to. You can make judgment based off what he says on whether you want to make a purchase based on your personal preferences. I personally do plan on playing Valhalla because I don’t mind his criticism as much (It is still a downside though). His review makes me feel comfortable buying this game on a sale down the line, and that is all I ask of a reviewer.
Having honest and strong opinions about a thing you review without being condescending with the deiffering views is what all reviewers should be like. It leaves room for people who disagree to know why they disagree and understand exactly how this game is or isn't for them.
Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring the video. If you want to set up your own website (and get a discount while doing it), hit this link for more info: www.squarespace.com/skillup
The all out war in the comments has begun. LETS GOOOOO!
@@Kage-jk4pj i hope you survive brother.
@@rembrandt2323 because its his job? to tell people if the game is good or not in his opinion
Destiny review when
6:43 nice way of avoiding spoilers...............
we both know its not just a loading screen😂
He spent 50 hours with the Avengers? Good God, that’s horrific.
His nation should reward him somehow.
@@bendovahkiin8405 then explain to me why the game was already dying on the first week
@@bendovahkiin8405 playing that garbage on hard won't make it better. LOL
@@bendovahkiin8405 Yeah, because just giving things more health and higher damage definitely fixes game design issues. Just make the numbers bigger.
I couldn't make it pass 3 hours (beta) and I have the patience of a saint.
You never buy a Ubisoft AC/FC/WD game on launch... You wait for the 75% sale in 4 months.
the only two i bought at launch was Odyssey, and FC3 i still love it the rest i've waited for massive sales
Lol good idea bro
Idk what kind of drugs you take to think you will get 75% off in 4 months
@@igniii3348 what I meant, since you don't seem to read between the lines, was that ubigames tend to lose value faster than any others triple A games. They churn too much of them too fast... They are rapidly put in the sale bin.
I think you mispoke. I think you mean never buy a ubisoft game at all. Ill NEVER buy a ubisoft or EA game and if you do YOU are the cancer killing gaming.
AC1: do everything you can to kill your targets while avoiding combat
Valhalla: go kill this nation.
Tragic how the series has steered away from its roots.
Indeed. turning AC into RPG is like fucking turning Hitman games into RPG.
I don't know why but I got bored playing AC1. The game start getting good from AC2 to Black flag.
@@kleberson777 They're all pretty flawed and bad imo. People glossed on them because of the impressive graphics. The only fun activity the franchise ever had were the ship battles in Black Flag, but even that couldn't rise the game above mediocrity for me. I remember getting so bored with AC3 I actually stopped playing and did my calculus homework for college instead.
I liked the story in the Ezio games and AC1 but the combat is a bit too easy apart from Revelations. Black Flag was fun but the story was pretty dull. I haven’t even bothered with the series after Black Flag
One thing I hate about the new assassins creeds is the endless amount of markers. I’m not sure if it’s just me, but the compulsion to collect them to take them off the map is too strong. It’s what I spend most of the time doing. Doesn’t help that some of them are underground with unclear entrance paths
Like spending an hour or more finding entrance for a worthless chest as a reward.
That’s been a thing in every assassins creed
@@Mr44andMore there were far less and the maps weren’t nearly as big. Sorry, I forgot people are only able to think in binary
@@theAEDan I’m sorry but 100 feathers and letters etc being in every game is far less?
@@Mr44andMore yea, for one they aren’t present on the map so there isn’t that compulsion to collect them. They’re also all located in a far smaller space. With odyssey though the map is insanely huge and all of the question marks are totally visible. What’s worse is often those question marks are located underground with no obvious means to reach them. It’s definitely far worse or people wouldn’t have commented on it
_Bloated, Boring and Endless._
Its almost like its a generic Ubisoft game.
almost lol
Hahah exactly
_Surprise, surprise._
Exactly. When Ralph came out with his first impressions review on this game, I was on the fence and was thinking to myself "Give it time, Ralph. Give it time. Ubisoft will eventually show their true colours". And bam.
Also after that disgraceful release for the Sands of Time remake, Ubisoft can go screw themselves. I was looking forward to seeing the Prince of Persia franchise get at least one remake...and then I was immediately heartbroken by that half-assed "remake".
I've been feeling like that even with Division that I actually like.
If you are a completionist like me, don't get this game. It's like a 9-9 job with a never-ending task list.
I can back you on that, it was mind numbingly boring.
Ngl I’m a completion to and it took me 70+ hours to 100% ac origins, after that I swore I’m never buying another ac game after origins again “at least the rpg ones”. I’ll wait till they go back to their unity and brotherhood style of gameplay
@@kingcrimson1222 I'll be surprised if they go back to the roots because the RPG setting has giving them a great excuse to be able to sell so much microtransactions in the helix store
@@skandas2281 This is only because of the setting since God of war and the end of the vikings show there's been massive growth in people interested in vikings, Ubisoft have cleverly released it during this time this is why the sales are high because people want to play a viking fantasy game and AC valhalla is the only game available that let's you do this 🤷♂️
@@connormaughan3425 Na man I just hope they stop making ac games , each new one that comes out Ubisoft gets a worse reputation for it
We’ve reached the point where anything to do with assassins in ASSASSINS CREED is fan service
wow the series has gone that far down the drain huh
Yeah seriously this is just bullshit at this point next were getting 80 hours of cavemen running around killing mammoths with 3 minutes of assassin's
@@Finite_Source far cry primal ? 😂
First people complain that the OG assassin creed games was getting old and that it was just ....assassinate this person assassinate that person on repeat game after game ... and when they actually do something different ...people still complain lol...... it’s similar to the fast furious movies argument
@@tyreesetoomer13 you know i could give you that point, it's a good game and all, but the problem is that it's just doesn't have the Essence of assassins creed, by this point Ubisoft should just end AC and begin a new one, these are not bad games but the concept of AC is just so low, like FS it began with races and that, then after some movie a random brother that we never heard about comes in, sure the movie could be entertaining but the concept of what was FS is lost
Crazy that I put 167 hours into elden ring and instead of wondering when it would end, I was getting sad that my journey was ending. Insane how map design, gameplay loops, etc can affect enjoyment of a game that much
Really? I got so tired of that game towards the end. It was getting grating and annoying.
Elden ring felt like it was made for people who love video games, Ubisoft games are made for target demographics.
@@Rooivalk_Mk_1.1 kinda felt like a drag towards the end, and don’t get me started on enemy reuse
@@EGsth7 Guess you should stay away from open world games, cause if you got tired of Elden Ring you probably won't finish any other game
@@liszt646 kinda of a stupid assumption to make but okay, more likely it just became boring for me bc there was little to no story motivation for me and I had already gotten the weapons and armor I wanted. Got boring after that.
Preston Garvey: “A settlement needs your help.”
Ubisoft: Yo, let’s make that the game.
Game's*
Far Cry New Dawn had the same crap.
@@ryno2376 it weird causce my cousin and his friends think that this game is the best in the series , he thinks it better than the 2 game causce it has better graphics
@@Mobt204 graphics is perfect, but game sucks..
@@Mobt204 They are probably kids who haven't played the original games or good games in general. There are so many games which are much better than this which offer the same gameplay.
@@someguy315 ok make scence but like vallhla even if it new it still sucks causce it story is terrible and it combat and stealth is a massive downgrade
Ubisoft: Okay, this time for real, we heard your feedback, next AC will be shorter
Also Ubisoft: Literally plans to release a game called AC: Infinity
Don’t give unisoft ideas
@@HFMurasma2774 that's a fact.
@@HFMurasma2774 its already announced lol
@@HFMurasma2774 already announced actually
🤣🤣🤣
“I spent 50 years on Avengers”
Dear God, this man made up the entire remaining playerbase of that game
Edit: I refuse to change my typo just continue pissing people off in the replies
Years?
he said hours
It really isin't that bad. It was actually fun, the problem with avengers is that there's fuck all in it. I mean really i dont see any other avengers games like that
@@theduck3876 I agree with about avengers I wasn't going to get it but I wanted something to play and I like comics so it was a good stop gap until cyberpunk came out 🤣🙄 but I've stopped playing until they drop the new characters but the gear grind only fun for a bit.
@@adrianjacobs5444 yeah that's what i plan to do as well.
Ubisoft achieved what no one ever did, making norse history and mythological so boring you wanna jump out of the window.
That’s an achievement. Maybe we need a word for the negative achievement?
@@infinimineyt9700 failure
Someone haven't watched Thor: The Dark World.
@@NorthernRealmJackal You brought back repressed memories from infinite boredom. Why did you need to do that??
@@NorthernRealmJackal I'd rather watch an entire playthrough's worth of Thor The Dark World than doing an entire Valhalla playthrough.
"I wish I could go back in time and not play this game." was the most brutal line I've ever heard about a video game lol.
Honestly the worst thing you can say about a game lol
Pretty much what i said to myself after Odyssey.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but so far I like the game. He is right took me 8 hours to complete the introduction quests, and 100% the side items in the first area.
I felt like that all the way back after AC2. Kinda good to see that i was ahead of the curve, because even if it was one of the better AC's it is still one of the least stimulating experiences i've ever had. It's hard to describe, but Ubisoft games are pretty often not entertaining, but rather just destracting. Once the distraction is over you woonder where the time went and are left feeling nothing, but a little bit closer to death.
@@loganwebb5086 most reviews are solid. If were being honest, Skill Up isnt a big open world guy, so best not to take his word as law here, still appreciate his opinions though.
It’s amazing how Ghost of Tsushima has outclassed Assassin’s Creed in every way
Honestly I disagree, Odyssey was a better game than Ghost of Tsushima in my mind. Ghost has better combat but worse exploration and world building.
Meh, exploration on this game is top notch compared to Ghost. But Ghost has that Sony polish on it that makes it special. If only Ubisoft invests more on their time fixing small bugs that breaks immersion, it might be up to that Sony polish.
Honestly enjoyed the more personal, smaller scale story in Ghost, reminded me a lot of the earlier AC's.
Stealth and parkour in Assassins Creed is 10x better than in Ghost Of Tsushima
@@juansalvadorgarcinifernnde8657 not at all.
I’m literally 98 hours in and it feels like I’m not even close to the ending
is it worth 30$?
@@phelipe000 pretty sure its not
This game felt like Andromeda - shallow, bloated, piss poor writing, 50% of it is open world collection / fetch quests just to pad runtime.
Dude I stopped at 10, then forced myself to finish Godfall so I don’t know if I was an idiot or not
Why
Yes! This is exactly how I felt. It's crazy how I finished the quest chain with Sigurd because it felt urgent, and then the game forced me into every region of the map to do boring side content (except it wasn't side content) to finally CIRCLE BACK to Sigurd for the finale. The pacing is atrocious and the gameplay loop simply does not hold up. It feels like playing a product to pass time, not to enjoy it.
I know right? It's hilarious. I just completed the Fulke mission after cashing in all of the alliances and finally rescuing Sigurd and what do I get? LMAO the blacksmith went to find a wife GO THERE EIVOR.
What even IS this pace?!
This was my exact experience! I finally finished the game after around 100 hours (due to sidetracking and stupid limited time seasonal events in a single player game), and for about 30 of those hours I was unaware that i had basically already finished the main plot with Sigurd and was just being forced to do chores before i was arbitrarily allowed to see how the main plot ended. It was like they looked at how AC2 prevented you from seeing the finale until you collected every codex page and decided to do that again but make it 100 times more frustrating and boring
I feel like you're being a little too harsh. I mean, there is no possible way that the Avengers game is better than Valhalla.
I played both back to back and I loved Valhalla way better
That the reason why this video have 11k hate
Valhalla is a boring game (after the first 20 hours), but not worst than Avenger indeed.
He didn't say it was worse he said he liked it better
the last assassins creed i played was black flag, and that came out almost 7 years ago which is crazy to think about, though i have yet to play any of the other ones that were released after that. i recently bought valhalla and have only been playing it for a few hours, and i can say that it is exceptionally better than black flag. keep in mind that i have not played odyssey so i cannot compare the two, but from my experience, i can truthfully say that investing within valhalla was worth it. obviously, that's just my opinion, and this video is biased, but i would say that there is a bit too much criticism.
"not good enough" should be the official Ubisoft motto.
"we protect abusers" should also be, for that matter.
"We dont care if the higher-ups sexually abuse people, we are French goddamn it!"
It should be “The Rape Company”
Outside of jimquistion and some Reddit threads, this is the first I’ve seen other people bring up the weird rape cult at Ubisoft. Idk if that’s me being blind but it’s not a good feeling either way.
@@fuckyoutubecomments7530 I’m so confused what is this rape cult thing
Ubisoft wants to make a game like witcher 3 but problem is they haven't quite reach quality of witcher 2 yet .
It has never worked and will never work, strange how Witcher had a quarter of the budget of Valhalla but yet but managed to do something ubisoft could never touch
@@luminious2963 if that’s true then all I gotta say is ...yikes!
@Kasey Nicholson in this comment thread we're comparing AC:Valhala and the witcher, and witcher is better.
Witcher 2 was really focused. Witcher 3 was W2 quality but exploded qua content. No bs content to be found in that game.
Like hell they want to make a game like The Witcher. They don't even want to make a game, as evidently seen here. They just want to print money by regurgitating the same Formula over and over.
I just finished and felt the exact same. I'm an inveterate completionist and this game was like torture to me and felt it completely disrespected my time. I agree with you entirely, so much filler but the potential for something much better to have been carved out of all the flab. Ah the positive thing is that it's made me give up on the Assassin's Creed franchise at long last so there is that.
I feel you brother, oh my God, I completely do. Just how CA did me, never touching anything they produce even if I never ever get to play any grand strategy game again.
Funny you say that as CA on my shit-list too for their canning of Three Kingdoms (so they can focus on making... Three Kingdoms?!)
See you on mirage
You're just now giving AC the boot? I couldn't even play Syndicate. I put a couple hours into Origins and the bloat was overwhelming. I just can't play this shit anymore.
Yea when assassin's Creed unity came out I was like alright multiplayer assassin's Creed! Now look what they've done what dummies lol
If odyssey and valhalla didn’t have “Assassin’s Creed” in the title you would think this is a new franchise.
Not if u are deep in the AC lore, the 3 games Origins, odessey and Valhalla are origin stories after all
However u could also say that about ac4 black flag as you're not an assassin until the end of the game, and Ac Rouge where ur playing a templar
@@MarkFilipAnthony the only one that is 100% apart of the AC franchise is AC Origins. The ones after do not matter at all to the story, you’d be better off not knowing it.
@@ethanking640 your main weapon in odyssey is a spear made by the ancient race going all the way back to AC2 and is made from the same stuff as the apple of Eden then you learn the truth behind Atlantis.
@@MrOrangeSmash but does that change anything previously known in the series except cheapen the apples? Because I don't even need to play the game to know by the way you describe it that it is an afterthought therefore wholly irrelevant.
@@MrOrangeSmash Oh wow you can use a very common weapon that's been used by armies for fucking centuries, what a deep connection to the AC universe :O
"My brother has returned from over seas. And he's brought with him a strange companion."
Sam kidnapped Yong?
LMAO
God tier comment!
YONG OUTTT!!
No no. Sam still in Australia. I think he means Thicc Boy.
Actual LOL
A moment of silence for this man, who played 50 hours of the Avengers...
Edit: Thanks for the likes
No cutting I couldn't do 15
@@itsacardboardworldwithshan8603 yeah but I mean he’s getting paid to do it
Never trust a man who plays 50 hours of the avengers
F
@@1armedwolf2003 have you watched his avengers review?
I got about 60 hours into this and then checked the map and saw how MUCH I had left and just put it down. Fun concept, pretty graphic, I like Eivor and the DLCs but oh my god
EDIT: If you enjoyed this game, that's okay! This comment here was just my opinion back then, agreeing with SkillUp's review. Some people got offended by it, but don't take it personal, please.
- There is no weight on this game's combat and movement, you feel like you're just hitting NPCs HP bars.
- The world is pretty, but it feels empty.
- The NPCs are all generic with the same faces and dialogues. Sometimes I see the same NPC models side by side doing the same animations.
- The missions are unending and just bad, feels like you're doing the same thing for 70 hours. Always that "talk > scan > kill" or follow someone.
- No motivation to keep going through the story, no real objective. Everybody hates you when you reach a new ally region, you do some missions, and then suddenly everybody loves you. Repeat this for like thirteen times.
- Like you said, the equipment you find throughout the world is boring. And the "secret" places to find them always follow the same pattern.
- No motivation to spend the silver coins you get, because the vendors are not interesting at all and they sell the same things.
After almost a year since I bought it (full price), after many times I've given up because I was too bored, I've finished it. I've finished the main story because I always want to prepare for the next AC title. It wasn't worth it, not even close. One of the worst and meaningless games that I've ever played for sure.
I should've watched your video before.
Haha man why do people force themselves to finish games. Sorry to hear that dude
I totally agree. I'm just 40 hours in and completed 3 alliance, and I am nowhere close to finishing. It just becoming a drag. I struggled with Odyssey but managed to finish and platinum within 60/70 hours. But this is next level. Hella repetitive. Was hyped at the beginning for this game. But the length of this game is killing me. I think I'm done. I'll think twice about purchasing an AC game.
@@Filthypagan right?? If I decide I am not having fun with a game it’s off my hard drive in the same minute I say that too myself. People don’t even respect their own time it’s crazy.
@BabbitXP if it’s not enjoyable absolutely. Gaming is something I do for fun and I have limited time to do it, I’m definitely not gonna spend that time playing something that’s not grabbing me and making me want to play more.
The worst part for me is that the 'ending' doesn't feel like a real ending, but just a setup for the "season pass".
This game, like Odyssey, suffers from "It shouldn't have been an AC game" syndrome. Another really cool idea ruined by the franchise it was forced into.
I remember talking to a friend about the topic, I think they should just consider making a new IP that’s also based in historical periods, especially with the virtual tour section they do now. When “Assassin’s Creed” is slapped onto part of the title it’s going to have high expectations from its more successful predecessors. Now if they gave it a different title and did some changes on mechanics it would at least be seen with more open-minded expectations and curiosity.
Ac would be dead if it wasn’t for the reboot
@@ffsnek1599 That’s true, I’m not saying it’s bad or good though, I just try to stay open minded and look at some things from different perspectives.
After being in origins, odyssey and valhalla.
We should accept that these ideas are the identity of 20% of the assassins creed games/franchise.
They tried to revamp it, and perhaps it was not a hit with some.
I have been enjoying the hell out of valhalla, and find the characters very interesting.
@@DeathDrager Oh yeah I still enjoy playing the games, it’s part of why so enjoy learning about world history so much!
To quote TBF: "Ubisoft mastered the art of nothing happening."
who is tbf?
Yeah who is he
I agree and it's so disheartening when you realize that this is a chronic issue nearly all triple A studio's share within the industry it's like they aren't even trying anymore honestly and if I had to decide what mediums of entertainment made the most of this flaming Pig shit of a year it would be The Anime industry /manga industry for gaming we've had some highlights but nothing super phenomenal really....just 💯🔥🐖💩 all the way unfortunately.
Are we talking all the way back to totalbiscuit?
Hello who is TBF?
I absolutely love the way you write your reviews. You speak so elegantly, yet plainly. Definitely a reviewer I will continue to watch.
Remember when people used to complain that games were only 10-20hrs long.
Yup
You can make any game 50 hours long if you just copy/paste all missions, which they did here with the entire campaign, is ok to have a 10/20 hours or a 60 hours game as long as it delivers an enjoyable experience, but Valhalla is just boring as hel
Remember where it was actually meaningful and not a copy and paste of the same shit over and over?
i dont see people complain for 10-20 hrs campaigns those are fine like DOOM eternal or DMC 5. if it was short like resident evil 3 or Miles than yes that is something to complain about.
@@thelel6591 Well, DMC is made for replayability.
“The length of the game becomes a meditation on its failures” good line
@@GrippeeTV Yeah how dare they make a long game /s. Some people like long games but judgement Andys here cant stand when other people have different opinions.
Yeah
@awteserhrst5h4r asdvavsrfaSfdds Literally dozen of good reviews - you sleep. One bad review - Yeah the game is shit I knew it. God youtube gamers are so obnoxious.
@@LordsUther I like long games... then the Irony games with 10h are critiziced for being too short. If he doesnt like long games review it with that in mind
fantastic review. this game is filled with bloatware. 10% of actual content. remaining 90% is just copy paste bloatware.
Someone isn’t getting a Christmas card from Ubisoft.
😂😂
He liked Legion tho
Lmao.
@@EthanRom legion was terrible
@Severus Von Emreis if you want to waste so much of your time that is
When I think about “games that are killing the industry”, this is the first thing that pops up into my mind.
damn straight
It was your AC: Odyssey review that actually convinced me to buy it and why I subscribed to your channel originally. Your pros and cons were accurate, just weighted differently for me as a person. Keep it up with the honesty.
How do you know that he is being honest?
Ac odyssey was abhorrent.
@@rcola6235 what reason would he lie?
@@rcola6235 because he gave an accurate representation of the game.
@@EmperorDxD witcher is pretty good, ngl
“I spent 50 hours with the Avengers, and I didn’t even *like* that. But I liked it a hell of a lot more than this.”
*O O F*
Big oof 😐
@@hitmankiller123 small oof
PLAYED BOTH
really not true at all
@@tommasoprevedello7593 yeah it's just a tired dig at UBISOFT. Go watch his AVENGERS videos and tell me he's not just making things up for soundbites.
@@andersonanderson1009 Yeah he's really hyperbolic these days.
My wife TORE Odyssey up, over 100 hours and generally loved everything BUT the DLC content. Valhalla she played for about half a day and just turned it off, saying "this game is boring. Trade it." I was shocked, but she and I watched this video and she said, "yep, pretty much all of the above were already telegraphing to me. I'm going to play something else." Oof.
I thought Odyssey is better too. The mythical nature of the game makes it more fun (fighting lions was beyond fun). Also the broken up islands made Greece feel like different regions, England on the other hand is one giant landmass that feels mostly the same.
@@KurlandHickory Also helps that Odyssey is your story.
Valhalla just feels like fetch quest for your brother and clan
i was exactly the same
Did you marry my wife? Lol. She did the same thing
@@giosketches Kassandra sets a high mark. Eivor just doesn't cut it, I think.
Been playing through it finally. And everything in this sums it up perfectly. “Wide as an ocean, deep as a puddle”
"I liked Avengers more than Valhalla."
Ubisoft sweating profusely
I think he shouldn't have said that, it hurts his credibility more than anything, lol.
@@WiseG33k how
.....ubisoft is not even going to remotely care lol
If you liked oddyssey youl like this one a lot avengers was a real joke
Me sweating profusely as its currently installing on my pc
Repetitive gameplay in a Ubisoft open world level grinder?
Who would have thought?
Holy shit I thought I was the only sane human being here.
Ubisoft games “Climb the tower or else”
So like every game ever?
This is exactly why i never buy a game at launch.
@@mentos93 but skillup is wrong. The combat is fun and can be punishing when you turn up the difficulty. You’re a Viking not an assassin.
The acting in this game has been one of the best and the characters show more emotion than in odyssey.
Repetitive gameplay of course but.... look at Spider-Man miles morales the games over in 8 hours.
10 hours tops and no reason to play it again.
I rather have a game like assassins creed that I can play and enjoy over a long period.
The lore and the mysteries in the game are interesting. I have 60 hours in just running around and getting myself killed in harder areas way above my pay grade.
Raiding could have been better. More difficult and maybe an option on you balancing areas or else the enemy could have regained footing. You’d have to raid again.
I actually enjoyed odyssey/origin loot over Valhalla’s but I can see what they were going for.
Remember when assassin's creed games where about assassins and thier creed?
Yeah its boring as fuck
The last ac game like that was origins
Every assassin creed game is about assasination and their creed you just hate it because they had less stealth and the hood.
Assassin creed origin = they tell us to assassin/kill all cult (templar) member that exist in egypt and how The creed is born and their first name is The Hidden One
Assassi creed Odyssey = tell us to assassin/kill all the cult member (templar) that exist in roman and why the creed protect all the eden pieces.
Its evolving from Assassin Creed Vs Templar to The Hidden One vs Cult.
It always be like that but this time with larger map,more items.
I always enjoy it lol but i respect you opinion because from AC origin-valhalla it always hurt my neck because i love exploring the map and thats kinda suck
@@stealthmaster1045 ikr nobody wanted Valhalla .....
New games are better. People are hipster bitches
I've played Valhalla for over 40 hours and I've only made it halfway through the game. They game felt like it would take an eternity to finish so I gave up and deleted the game from my Xbox cause it was only wasting space. It's been 6 months now and I still have not found the courage to finish it
I finished the base game - first AC game I completed. It was good
Literally the most shittiest ac game ever
Your experience is my exact experience.
I did finish it trust me it’s not worth the suffering
I finished assassin creed 1 - 3, including all of ezio series. I quit playing valhalla after about 5 hours. It was boring.
Everything you said here about janky combat, generic missions, and no payoff, pretty much applies to "Watch Dog Legion" as well. Its thankfully not as long, but I dont doubt its as generic, that's Ubisoft for ya
Its even worse and set in Britain as well.
Legion is unplayably boring. Valhalla is what I expected and at least enjoyable for a while anyway.
Modern "AAA" titles have reached this level, where every aspect of them is just meh. They lack both scope and depth, that would make them interesting.
Open world, even with generic elements, could be interesting, if there is enough depth to this game. Like loot or extended character development system. If those generic features are arranged in a very good way.
None of it is present in games like Valhalla and Legion. They are big, but utterly shallow, lacking enough content for enjoyable gameplay loop, where you can go from activity 1 to activity 2...to activity 37, keeping player interested, because there is so many different things to do(and they are not mandatory) and any of them making impact on gameplay in some shape or form.
What we see with those games is developers starting to reach rock bottom of practice that has been in place for last 10 years or so, where games have been gradually watered down(Fallout franchise is a perfect example), to appeal to largest audience possible, resulting in none of those games having anything that would make them even remotely special, not to mention unique. You just repeat same extremely limited number of activities, for very little reward or impact on anything. Grind is no longer tool for reaching certain goals, it is all that those games have. Very little substance.
@@sharkh20 Valhalla was what I expected and not enjoyable at all. I liked Origins, Odyseey was a downgrade, and somehow this is WORSE. Inconsistent framerates, bugs and glitches littered everywhere, boring asf features that put me to sleep WATCHING them (can only imagine what it'd be like playing it; gonna leave in a coma). The janky, stiff, 15 fps combat was just an overall deal-breaker for me though. Not even about to touch this game.
Someone once said to me Ubisoft design is like Mexican fast food, you can order a burrito, taco or a enchilada, but at the end the ingredients are all the same and the only difference is how it's served.
I put 150 hours into red dead redemption 2 and I was sad it ended.
I’m still putting in hours in RDR2. Online is getting better, even though I’ve done most of it by now.
@@henrikaugustsson4041 you mean the weekly sales on beans?
@@Abcdefg-uw4id Gotta have that cowboy chow at a discount my guy ;)
same, the only other games that made me felt that way were Witcher 3 and Zelda
Hell, I’ve put 200 into it and still have to go back at least once a week to just experience the amazing world they built...and find some secrets. Finally caught the Vampire in Saint Denis lol.
"I took 55 hours to beat odyyeys"
**me having 90 hours and only about half way through the storry**
I was thinking the same thing plus I didn't play the side missions
plus he praises WD: L when theres very little to do in it vs this game. I understand this game has bugs and should have been a few months more delayed but choosing WD: L over this is very odd.
SAME lmfao
i have 90 hours and i've done everything on the map but not the dlc
@Jobs .com Bro just wandering around ancient Greece is enough for me to invest in a few more hours. the accuracy and level of detail in Athens is astonishing. Riding your horse around Makedonia and stumbling on ancient sites is just 😍... that's why i played the shit out of Origins... I've played 60h so far in odyssey and didn't finish like 50% of the game according to uplay lmao
Pro tip for buying Ubisoft games: Don't look forward to them? Buy them like 2 years after release for like ten bucks when you're just looking for a new game to burn time on. Like when you just wanna simulate productivity. Here's an open world, here's all the collectables on the map, here's easy flashy combat, probably won't stop having fun till 20-40 hours. Why expect anything better from Ubisoft? Their last game I bought at full price was Far Cry 3. Then they clearly just started following the same formula for all their games.
"I liked Marvel's avengers a hell of a lot more than I liked (Assassin's Creed) Valhalla" - Skill up 2020
That's a savage takedown.
Now that's hard to believe
Christ! That’s pretty brutal
And proves that he flat has poor game taste period..
@@CVSiN or he can just think for himself
@@the_seer_0421 it really is
Dude can’t be bought . Always willing to go against the tide if that’s the way he feels he should. Good man. Top job.
Not really. Complains game is to easy but plays it on normal difficulty. I mean how can u take that review serious. Seems like all the stuff he complains about is stuff he didn't figure out how to do in the game. Poor review to be honest.
@@aandlwireless just because you’re an AC fanboy who loves Valhalla doesn’t mean SkillUp’s review is bad. I bet if he loved the game you would be saying “what a great review.” Good review to be honest.
If normal feels easy then you are too experienced for normal it's not that crazy. Especially since some people been playing these games since 2007 like we've definitely mastered being an assassin by now.
@@aandlwireless If a game offers different difficulties then normal should be the most balanced. By your stupid arguments every game should be like Dark Souls, insanely difficult by default with no way to change difficulties.
@@aandlwireless Disagree. There should still be some level of difficulty in Normal. Majority of people go into games on the game's normal difficulty. If there isn't at least some challenge to every difficulty, that's a major problem. A game needs a challenge to overcome. That is one of the core fundamentals to any game design. If there is no challenge. And if a game is too easy. Then what are you actually getting out of what you're doing? If a character talks of overcoming a difficult threat in any given game, how can the audience relate to it at all? If it was piss easy you would feel no resolve. No accomplishment. The reason a game is a game is in it's ability to relate your actions to what is going on in that world. The character says it was a slow, hard fought victory. The player feels like it was a walk in the park. It lacks impact and creates a dissonance between the player and the game. Not allowing you to relate to these characters in turn or feel deeply involved in the world.
Game's need some level of challenge to every difficulty given. And if normal, arguably the most picked game difficulty, is really easy, you think about how many experiences that might ruin? Sure you can change difficulty but playing it on the normal difficulty, the most standard and most picked difficulty in gaming is really essential to reviewing a gaming experience, as it is accustomed for a large majority of people to relate to, as they will play through on normal. That is why this review is absolutely fair and wonderfully professional. His complaints are completely justified. And his review is great.
I am a game design student at Media Design School. Fresh, just finished my first year. But I've learnt an awful lot. Including the fact that challenge is one of the most core fundamentals to making a good game. Have a good day Mr. Looby
ACG and other reviewers not finishing the game is why the reviews are so different from Skillups. No shit you're gonna look at a game highly if you only play 15-20 hours of a 60 hour game, how do you even rate the story when you haven't reached the finale. Do most people even finish the AC games?
You are right he is bored with the game that's why he is soo negative about it
hard to finish if the game bore people, Yahtzee is done with AC after Odyssey, wonder how brutal he will be to this one
I get that, but also you can look at how many hours before you got bored v what you paid for it, with these open world Ubi games it's usually many hours and worth the purchase price.
@@Muslimman570 That's what I always feel about this guy, not an objective critique just (this is boring because it's long and because it's a job and I don't like to work). It feels shallow.
I'm 24hours in and I'm enjoying it alot. Not even going to click play on this guys video.
I think the setting just didn't do it for me. I really loved the world of Odyssey. Old England just didn't interest me as much as ancient Greece.
What annoys me most is the cringe voice lines, especially from a woman in my crew who keeps saying "ITS AXE TIME" every time I raid a monastery
Don’t forget The dumbass song that plays on repeat during raids. I have to turn the music off every raid.
*iTs aXE tiME!* 🪓😈
@@dreamsneezer8668 That song is one of the little things that I actually enjoyed in ACV.
@@ryno2376 hah no shit? it was cool at first I guess but after the 73637844th time it played I was done
@@dreamsneezer8668 Agreed
I think the lack of facial expression and animated movements during missions cut scenes killed the immersion and momentum for alot of it
Yeah I don't know what happened here, odyssey's wasn't the best but my God they are 1000x times better than a lot of Valhalla's animations. I have no clue how they went backwards
Ubisoft just needs to get back to their roots and put in a main protagonist. Remove the male femal protagonist altogether and work on a character you'll be invested in by relating to his story. Origins was good. Odyssey and Valhalla was a mess
@@cedricmendoza8316 atleast ancient greece was awesome to explore.
That and magically shrinking weapons.
The people calling you she when you're clearly a man.
The women with the bodies of men.
The fact that apparently half of England in the 800s were 10 feet tall giants.
The studded leather armor and furs.
The lack of proper viking tactics.
The use of terminology that did not exist yet.
The shit tier voice acting.
And not to mention the horrible combat system they've been using of late. Button mashing tedious mind numbing laziness. Basically Destiny in singleplayer form.
Assassins creed is truly a dumpsterfire these days. So glad I pirated it. Ubi doesn't deserve my money.
@@nwah4707 As far as I remember old AC combat wasn't glorious as well, and in fact was just a shitty button mashing. Character feels godly, devoiding that combat challenge experience. It was just parry then one-hit.
50 hours of valhalla felt like 50 hours while 500 hours of monster Hunter went by in a flash
Factual
Because monster Hunter is fun it has soul in it everything about it is amazing playing online fighting monsters having cool moments AC just doesn’t have that
To me it's the opposite, I HATED Monster Hunter, the combat was so damn boring.
@@IHMyself a.k.a. You sucked 😂
@@Viewahh you grilled him mate lmao Polar Flow was probably new to monster hunter games
I wish I'd listened to this before I sank 120+ hrs into this mess
Just now, I completed ghost of Tsushima for the 4th time and I’m already considering playing it over again. When you make a game with the love for making games, you get a great fucking game.
Damn, is GoT that good? I was considering getting it tomorrow but I'm not quite sure yet.
@@user-yg8jf1zk9e honestly, without being hyperbolic, it’s pretty damn good. Not perfect but considering everything else that’s out there right now, it’s the best game I’ve played in awhile. The combat, by far, is the highlight for me.
That just sounds retarded and stupid, it came out in July and you've played 4 times. There's literally only the story and that's it, it's like watching a movie on repeat, I get it if the game was cyberpunk but it's a linear story game with little to no decision making parts and the outcome is mostly the same, you just sound bored
@@MrJackrussell12 lol alright man, chillll. It’s a pretty good story, a little cliche but hey, no micro transactions or level gating. The combat is simple but oddly satisfying on lethal. The side quests characters aren’t just one and done. The game looks more like a painting and gives you a lot time to admire it. For me, it was a breath of fresh air so with the little time I had after work days, I was more then happy to experience it over and over again. Maybe try it or don’t. Idk. You do you man.
@@Hamppdur i dont get it how did you not get bored? I already felt the combat was too repetitive and got bored after act II on my first playthrough (90% of my skilltree was already filled by end of act I). But you somehow managed to play GoT for 4 playthroughs... Theres no way i could do that even if someone pays me lol
not gonna lie when you said "some great fan service right here" i rolled my eyes. hearing that the Assassins creed in a Assassins creed game has been demoted to fan service tier is just sad
Assassin's Creed is dead
I bought this game because it's a GOOD viking game. I love vikings.. Screw assasins and templars.
@@Kvs-vf9nt yes well it is called assassins creed
That's his choice of word .. doesn't make it true, it's the part of the story not some fan service.
@@thesigmamale2134 So? I just bought it because it's a viking game. I liked black flag, and origins too a lot! But odyssee no!! I still have the game and want to just give it away
The reason it’s getting a 90% is because reviewers only have time to play it for 5 hours before needing to get the review out
Yeah true I had that same thought!
U failed to mention the ever so fun and totally not broken rock building simulator. Really pulled this game together and truly immersed me into this magical world.
I care more about side characters in The Witcher than I do about main characters in AC games. I remember and care more about the Bloody Baron than I do about Alexios or Bayek.
The bloody baron was epic
Barons story arc was damm good compared to this
The lady missing her frying pan, the sister of the slain wife of a werewolf by the husband’s own hands, meeting Letho again, the tower outta nowhere, there are so many memorable quests that a player could have just skipped.
Bayek was cool though...
True same goes with rdr2, i care most of the characters more than valhalla.
Finally after months of playing this, countless breaks, after more than 125 hours, I have finally finished the game lol
This might be my last AC game, I’m done with these mindless repetitive endless games.
Wtf i play about 2 hours per day average this shit would take me around 60 days to finish what the hell. Im glad i bought the ezio collection instead
Well you still beat it so that tells me It's worth it.
@@travisgraham3104 not realy some events in it are limited and last only a month gametime so ..... yeah
@@travisgraham3104 😂 not exactly, I’m a completionist so I had to finish it. There are roughly 50 hours of gameplay where I had to push myself to play through. So I’d say I enjoyed it 60% of the time. Not to mention, I took many weeks off where I didn’t even touch it just because I was so bored with it. If you can push through of that 50-60 hours of repetitive gameplay, go for it.
I still haven’t finished it and have already decided not to buy another Ubisoft game again.
The story is sooo bad!
"Hey Eivor, go to this place and help these People."
"Good job Eivor! Now do the same shit for 50 more hours."
Oh damn💀Come on guys it can't be thatttt bad
@@falsedamage unfortunately it is
@@jluck1399 shut up
@@falsedamage you make alliance to conquer England that's the story
I think another part that upset me about this was that you are literally the second in command and are told to go make alliances with the surrounding territories. That means you have to obviously be away from the main camp. Yet your allies (one in particular) gets butt-hurt that you're always away from camp. But the few times you are called on to settle issues in the camp, he's mad at you for that too saying you're getting too comfy on the throne. Like .... what?
I just finished after 180 hours and that was just the base game. I recall watching this review 3 years ago and yup, spot on. I mean spot on Ralph. The cut scenes are boring and the game grated on me the more I played. Still need to do the DLC.
I have a friend who has a disability called Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome that makes it so she's not able to do a lot of physical exploration outside her room. She's played through Odyssey twice and is on her third playthrough of The Witcher 3. This seems like the perfect game for her.
It’s not fun though
I hope she has fun with it : )
@@aidankhaos7687 fun is subjective to every different person so...
does she have the dlc for the game and has she played fallout?
eds is actually a name for a whole bunch of symtoms none of which are 'can't leave room for long time' xD
When Ghost of Tsushima was the actual AC game we got this year.
I might replay that instead
@@UnityUprisingHQ that's fair
Both games are amazing and got to enjoy both of them. What is your point?
@@Ornoob- Valhalla is shit
@@Ornoob- The point is most people do not feel Assassin's Creed games come anywhere near Ghost of Tsushima's quality. I never played Assassin's Creed personally, so I'm not judging, I'm just explaining to you what the point is since you seem very confused about what people are saying.
At first I absolutely loved this game. Mistakingly, I decided that I wanted to go for the platinum trophy. Just under 140 hours later, I want my time back.
@@AsproWavey Quiet child🤫
@@AsproWavey good for you.
@@AsproWavey the only exception to new ac games is origins
@@AsproWavey um what?
A few things I'd like to mention that really irked me in this game
1) Playing as an assassin is boring. There are maybe 5 animations total in the entire game and it's all dependent on how you are doing the assassination. And they are slow and clunky, like the combat. You had like half a dozen in Odyssey and got rid of them for what?
2) The entire stun attack mechanic is probably the worst thing to happen to AC combat. Breaks the flow where you do the same animation of killing someone with whatever weapon THEY are using, not your own cool looking weapon.
3) Dual wielding weapons is lame. You barely use the other weapon, plus the way they designed for you to be able to switch to the other weapon is something you have to unlock in their nightmare of a skill tree. Most of those skills are either minimally useful or flat out useless.
It's funny how different the opinions on this game are.
yeah its really split into those who love it or hate it, nothing in between
This is the new "strand type" game
It's excellent don't fall for this bs, that's coming from someone that fell off Odyssey after 20 hours and I hated Orgins, already put almost 30 hours into it.
@@TheNightWolf-WildCraft its not. You probably just like the setting
@@TheNightWolf-WildCraft odyssey is much better, this is trash
I miss the days when the maps weren't so big and there was actual interesting characters that tied in to the modern day story.
Everything from the Ezio to Black Flag I would say was the best of the series. Now its turned into a bootleg grindfest where stealth is not even needed anymore. Nothing happens in the modern day story and they just keep shitting out a game each year.
Back in the Desmond days it felt like we were reaching a conclusion of the story now we got nothing.
I agree. This is just my personal opinion, but ACIII was my personal favorite. I absolutely loved exploring colonial America and getting caught up in the Revolutionary War. I was just blown away.
Black Flag had a very similar feel and was remarkable in its own right, although both were a bit grindy IMO. I got so immersed in those games. Everything felt “grounded” in terms of history, details and battles. I felt that my in-game victories were well earned and not just inevitable. I feel like magical weapons, mythical creatures, riding around on a horse sized wolf, and super exaggerated cosmetics and armor only get further away from what made the previous ones great.
Edit: I want to clarify that I understand these games have and always have had certain fantasy and unrealistic elements to them. It’s difficult to put into writing what I’m talking about. I think we’d all agree that nothing is ever black and white and it’s not like any given game is either historically accurate or not. There’s a huge range of “grey area” in regards to the subject accuracy since a game that was 100% historically accurate would be extremely boring, no matter the genre.
I remember in 2018 when I was expressing my disappointment at the lack of historical accuracy in BFV; I got so much criticism with statements like “Battlefield has never been historically accurate! If you don’t like ABC, then what about XYZ in previous games!?” I feel like comments like that deliberately misinterpret and distract from the issue by pretending there’s never been an appropriate range of historical accuracy in games that have been well received. Everyone knows, not any single game is 100% accurate and we all know that liberties have to be taken to ensure fun and compelling gameplay. But I think anyone who has been gaming long enough understands that there’s an unofficial range of what the gaming community would consider a historical accuracy focus. The best current examples I can give are the differences between BV1 and BFV. Both games have elements of their respective wars that are anything but historically accurate. But anyone who has more than a budding interest in 20th Century warfare and technology will agree, that BFV took waaay more liberty with their interpretation. To those who don’t know much about the conflicts or just don’t care, it may not be noticed, but it was certainly the largest departure from historical accuracy in terms of weapon, vehicle, equipment and cosmetic accuracy for the battles and settings within the game. Another example is Red Dead Dead Redemption 2. I’m currently playing it on PC and love every second. It’s not 100% accurate to the period but is definitely within what the grand majority of gamers would consider historically accurate for the late 1890’s in the U.S.. The game is extremely immersive and a joy to explore, in my opinion, because of this.
Everyone’s opinions are valid.
@@nateweter4012 Black Flag was my favorite. AC3 SHOULD have been my favorite, but every aspect of AC3 that was unique to the revolutionary war was just a cheap gimmick, and I hated that.
I was super looking for to interrupting some line battles, and having some skirmishes with allies. Instead line battles were a game of hide and seek behind cover then sneak around back. And skirmishes were you going from left to right on a horse.
Also fun fact, remember the trading system? Where you'd sell pelts, and craft stuff? Selling raw materials in AC3 was the best profit. I even crafted the cannons and such, which actually took awhile to make. And the net gain was literally less than if I just sold the materials separately. Why would you do this!?
I think I enjoyed AC1 to Origins. I liked the idea of them testing the waters with RPG for Origins and the story wasn't as bad, Odyssey was just a general grindfest; for quests, armor, and to find the entire Cult. (This guy knows where the cult is but you have to help him liberate his island by helping all the villagers plus fighting for Athens in the fight as well as travelling 10000 miles to talk to his brother just to deliver a pot back to him)
Unity was shit when it came out, but Ubisoft patched it up pretty well, and is now one of the best assassins creed games in my opinion.
@@caljackal6139 Yah I wasn't a fan of Syndicate and didn't really like that Origins tried to turn it into a witcher hybrid but at least Origins tried to tell the origin story of the Assassin's. When Odyssey came out that's when I knew I was officially done with the series....Unity was the last Ac game I felt comfortable purchasing but I honestly think Black Flag was the last good AC game. When they killed Desmond I didn't think much of it, but now I truly feel like that was the domino effect that ruined the series
The idea of a big hulking viking with a shield also being a stealthy assassin... I just don't get it.
Vikings don't scream stealthy, they just scream.
Viking's don't do stealth. They fight their enemies head on and furiously. Ubisoft doesn't get that at all. If they want to do stealth so badly, make a AC game set in Japan where you play as a ninja.
@@chrisnichols5572 Hell if they wanted to do an AC game set in England, just use Robin Hood as a base.
@@MegaInsaneMC they already did Syndicate in London. Well it’s not dark ages but yea
@@chrisnichols5572 I feel like there saving Japan for a last ditch effort, call it there ace in the hole of worse comes to worst.
@@dantemcmillan6337 Way back when they contemplated doing Japan but thought it was a boring setting. Now Ghost of Tsushima is out, it's a very similar game and is a smash hit.
AC odyssey was AMAZING. Idc what people say. The world building, the choices you make, the people, setting, everything was unique and intriguing to explore. Valhalla is SO FRIGGIN BORING. World looks the same every where. No character that stands out. Story is flat out boring and too long to follow.
Odyssey is absolutely great and always was and will be
This game looks like they took the worst parts of Origins and Odyssey and slapped them together
Exactly
not true
Origins was good odyssey was shit
Valhalla is shit too but better than odyssey imo
@@bruhinthebruhwiththebruh1370 hell nah odyssey is so much better
Definitely better than odyssey it’s not as bloated and the story is better
Ubisoft: The Game, again.
Exactly, and people still got suckered in to buying the game.
@@Half-Vampire To be fair if the game that shall not be named released this month as expected I suspect there would've been %40 less purchases.
@@Half-Vampire And people who judge by not Playing it... JESOS...
This HATE BANDWAGON is getting Worse than BRAIN DEAD ZOMBIE...
And that’s why I don’t plan on buying any Ubisoft Titles anymore. Even Watch Dogs Legion looks like an empty playground. 🙅🏻♂️🙅🏻♂️
I hated Odyssey personally but so far i really like Valhalla. The bugs are a annoying though...
For anyone that’s just getting into AC. There was a time when we can Counter an attack and then Chain attack to multiple enemies. No skills and abilities. Just straight up brutal Stab and cuts.
And it was the most boring gameplay ever. Spamming counter-attacks every single fight is the definition of repetitive and also the reason why the majority of the people (including me) stopped playing Assassin's Creed games. Origins literally revived a dying franchise by introducing the new combat (and stealth) system.
I would never play an AC game again if they returned to the old format. However, I think Unity was pretty cool (aside from annoying gunners that one shot you)
@@TheChodex I hear you on the old combat, the endless counter attacks got old. Ghost of Tsushima really set the new standard for me for hand to hand combat, brutal and precise, easy enough to take guys down that you felt powerful, but dangerous enough that you'd die easily if you lost focus. I loved how defensive enemies were, but when you timed it right and got through their defense, they dropped easily and satisfyingly. I was really hoping for Valhalla to build on something similar, but looks like they didn't
@@TheChodex i think you’re missing the point. Yes combat wasn’t as developed back then but that’s mainly due to the purpose of the game being ASSASSINS. Play the game however you please but don’t forget it’s meant to be played stealthy
Back when you could just one shot any enemy with stealth, counter attacks, stunning items or your gun?
@@ethanking640 and it was repetitive and sometimes unresponsive
15 Hours in AC Valhalla and… No, im done. I cannot continue, I even put everything on Easy to make it less Stressful and that didn’t help.
Also because i was on PC i used an Inventory Editor to get all the Boosters and Store Items and yet i didn’t feel satisfied
After playing tsushima, these games are essentially impossible to play. And I used to love AC, once upon a time they were actually my favorite series. After I got this game, I realized it was just reskinned odyssey and origins an hour in and now regret the money I spent.
I’m feeling this right now man. Wasted $60.
Ghost is soo fucking boring
same, while i love ghost i still find the open world activity kinda boring. i can't imagine if i had to grind level on these games
i know you didn't really say ghost of tsushima was good. game was the definition of boring
@@Mr.Iwuagwu nani
"You do it to yourself, and that's what really hurts."
-Radiohead
@SoulsMaster He's buzzing like a fridge
Just....... why?
@@skyfryer1223 I'm sure I'm missing the point here, but you know that's Just from The Bends right?
*Song for this year*
Its the devils way now,
theres no way out,
you can scream you can shout,
It is too late now
because
you have not been
paying attention...
@@gavinr4214 the raindrops x47
Fun drinking game, take a shot every time he says “67 hours”
Diogenes Rhaven I got 86 hours as of today and I legit just beat the game
@Diogenes Rhaven yeah
Are you trying to put people in the hospital man
I think I'm dead
@@ryleywhitehead1703 i watched a guy who said he had 85 hours in the game and wasn't evne near done with the story. lol
Hey man I was so close to getting this game, because there are so many reviewers who only praise this game...not a single one pointed the things out you did...thanks for saving me a lot of time and struggle...
I swear is because ubisoft is scared if it don't have the assassin's creed name they can't sell it they should have just did a viking game with no assassin stuff
I like how it is. I mean sure they could’ve put AC more obvious but I like the little undertone that it has
Nobody would buy their game if they don't put AC title on their games. Their games at mediocre at best and the fanboys of the series are only making them money
This is the only Assassin's Creed I have and the only reason I bought this game is because it's a viking game.
I'm still waiting for my damn non AC branded Pirates of the Caribbean game from Ubisoft ever since Black Flag.
Skull and Bones is not what most Black Flag fans wanted. If it ever comes out anyway.
@@accountnotfound4209 I don't fuck with ac games, bought 2 and origins (10h?) I probably woulda copped a new viking IP ngl
SkillUp: The game is to long
Angry Joe: FOOOOOUUUURRR HOUUUURRRSS...
Oh god his voice is seared in my brain
i legit read that in the slow mo voice
Well to be honest he might have his part to play in the elongating of games. And the funniest thing is he sees the same problem as games are getting too long, but reflection that he might be the problem with his "Only four hours!!!"? nope. There is no obejctive right length of a game.
Angry Joe beat it in 4 hours???
There is much less grinding and level capping in this game. Side quests feel optional and not a way to get xp
I felt this way about Odyssey. Wonderful fun for the first 20 hours, then 30 additional hours of slogging, leading up to an unsatisfying, ridiculous ending
When i started playing odyssey i wanted to get to all the question marks i played for over 100 hours before giving up and in the end i just wanted to get it over with .
I Never finished it
And that's the review on any ubisoft game
@@pabloqueima True :(
That's why I never liked open world games, they have too much irrelevant and repetitive filler, made by an out of touch corporation that used to be a respected game studio a long time ago.
I just hope they don't screw up Cyberpunk 2077.
I’m a huge fan of Odyssey and I hated Valhalla. Easily the most disappointed I’ve ever been with a game.
Other reviewers: "This is a great step up from Odyssey, but raids are shit"
Skill up:" Boring, but raids good"
I don't know who to believe anymore
It's an opinion. Either play it or don't if you're basing a decision off merit.
I won't be playing this or watch dogs. I'm really picky about how I spend my time playing games and don't feel the need to buy the next shiny toy.
Lots of disposable income. Not as much time. So I choose wisely.
+1 in the Raids Are Shit but Game Is Good category
Im loving it. Longer the better if you ask me. Value for money, Its far from boring.
@@V_ii good choice on skipping Watch Dogs... It's really bad. I guess I'll find out how bad Valhalla is on the 12th.
In a nutshell this game is shit
Title so spicy I clicked off another vid immediately
dude, same
Same aswell lol
It got me too. The opening section then hooked me instantly.
Game is made for auto-aimers with 30 PREMIUM FPS doing macro-transactions for cut content giving out their personal data and that data is being exploited by publishers to inflate and keep people in the loop. Welcome to the brave naive world. Developers of said naive world can't face the facts so they suppress, censor people. Outsource their dirty work to influencers which get high when they receive free merch.
Free merch > free speech.
Is your mind blown how people fall for same thing every time? It shouldn't be. Because divided, singled out individuals has no chance against organized criminal entity; corporation.
Corporation is an approved scam & spy business. Their approval was obtained through manufactured consent. Corporation is not the industry of manufacturing products. Corporation is in the industry of manufacturing consent.
As well Corporations [through governments] are harvesting our biometric data on global scale. So they can get to know us far better than we know ourselves,
and they not just predict our feelings but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want- Be it a product as a service or politician.
Check out "The Corporation", "The century of the self", "Stockholm syndrome"
@@livinginpatheticera3867 what
People didnt talk about how easy the game is because "journalist mode"
Just posted similar, glad to see other people are noticing this. Even though it is funny; as "Games Urinalists" are hilariously dumb. It isn't me, you, or the others who have stated it being facetious; it is actually a bad thing and worries me. I don't want to have to have a cheat code to make a game play as it should. But, I seriously think Ubisoft did exactly that and other companies may follow suit for the good reviews out of MSM reviewers.
Easy in reference to what, black flag, syndicate ?
@@LemanRussx i dont know about syndicate, but black flag did get more difficult yet more rewarding as time went by. I mean youre an assasin main protag hero so of course youre gonna be a 1 man army bad ass. But like. On normal standing still barely taking damage while 1 enemy out of 5 actually attacks? thats FAR too easy for "normal" it usually goes: easy = no application, normal = apply the basics, hard= advanced application.
If you domt have to try on normal thenn???
Haha, and they don't even finish the game.
@@kngowo9541 ah I catch you're drift, saw that part in the video as well
The only reason I play Valhalla now is to wind down from stressful times and wander through Norway. The music, the stunning views, are just so meditative. But the story was way too long to do a 2nd playthrough. and the side quests? well, I can't be bothered.
and 22:00 well it's even worse when you realize that the most powerful weapon you'd want in the game, is ALREADY in your hands at the start. the fully upgraded Varin's axe is one of the best weapons in the game, so you'd go out of your way to collect gear and it would just be... useless
This whole review is savage, and I'm so glad it exists.
I’m an idiot for buying the game before watching reviews or first opinions on it 🤦🏻♂️ when you play games with great combat like ghost of tsushima, dark souls, and sekiro you immediately notice the difference.
yah I am mad that they killed Assassins Creed!
@@m.israel2209 +1. I wasn't expecting a game this bad. This is disgustingly bad and i feel insulted. I was expecting improvement over Odyssey which i find it fine.
yep, i wish i waited for it before buying it......
@@m.israel2209 Fortunately I even warned a friend of mine who wanted to buy it, to wait and have a look on reviews, gameplay, etc., well... he quickly decided to not waste money on that one.
Sometimes I find it hard to believe reviewers who say "I hate this game that I put 100 hours into." But at the same time, if someone gave a full review of a 100 hour game after just 10 hours, then they have no right to be a reviewer, putting the time into such a lengthy game is necessary for a good assessment. Thank you for pushing through as long as you could, I appreciate the effort you put in for your channel
Check your logic when you feel that way. This whole notion of "dur dur, well you played some arbitrary amount of time....dur...why would anyone do that unless they LOVE IT" makes just as much sense. Which is none. I watch movies through to the credits that I also judge to suck. I play survival games for dozens or hundreds of hours to placate friends that I think suck. Sometimes people just get into that abusive loop of time wasting. Doesn't mean a game is enjoyed because it sucks hours out of you. By that logic, the cashier at your gas station really must love that job!
@@Amrylin1337 did he really say that? I thought he just commended Skillup for pushing theough an unenjoyable experience for the sake of delivering to us a thorough review.
People may be pushing for variety of reasons. Like in hopes that things will be better down the line. Or they have nothing better to do. Or they are just bored.
Hell, i sometimes play same games simply because i dont want to start a new game, as weird as it sounds. I dont want a new experience at this particular moment and this state can last for a while.
@@holysecret2 thats what I was trying to get at. If you're going to review a game, play it to the fullest extent that you can so that you have a valid reason to recommend or not recommend.
At the same time I can't entirely trust a guy that clearly doesn't like a genre but keeps trying to review them.
Like, I don't mind the opinion but IMO if you're starting to do something and you already want it to end it's more likely that you'll end up hating it, especially if it takes 50+ hours.
A LOT of people didn't get the whole "bloat level gating" issue with Odyssey, me included. Why? Because we never, ever, not even once had to grind to do anything in that game. If you like the RPG genre, the ARPG genre, the open world ARPG genre, that's natural progression, not grind.
I just played a game on my Switch called Xenoblade Chronicles Definitive Edition and absolutely loved it but I noticed something... I played it with the same mindset I do in most rpgs/open world games, I progressed naturally through the cities and maps, meaning that I would take every side quest possible and started completing them until I felt I wanted to move on with the story. Xenoblade has like 480 side quest while Odyssey doesn't even get to half that number.
The thing is, when I was at about halfway through the story in Odyssey I was already max level having to scale enemies up to my level to have fun while in Xenoblade I faced the reality that I had to level up EVEN MORE to even scratch the last boss, literally because they have a system that if you're outside a 5 level range with the opponent you miss pretty much every attack, so I had to, guess what? Grind..
You see, it's natural progression if you want to do it but it becomes grind if you're forced to do it. In other words Skill Up is being forced to play these games, it's not the first time and it won't be the last, he doesn't really like these kinds of games and after watching most of his videos, he isn't the target audience for them.
The vast majority of games he plays and reviews fall in three categories. It's either a game that goes on for 20 to 40 hours, a game that can be replayed over and over again (like the rogue likes he mentioned) and multiplayer MMO-lite games. He doesn't play 100 hour JRPGs and he doesn't play 100 hour western or CRPGs. He doesn't even have a Witcher 3 review as far as I know, one of the best and most influential games of the last decade. And that's not a problem at all, it just goes back to what I said, he's not the target audience.
Xenoblade Chronicles is considered one of the best JRPGs of all time and Assassin's Creed Odyssey is considered a bloated boring game. I get it, in Xenoblade the story is better, the characters are better and the writing is better but I'm talking about bloat, about grind, about boredom.
These games look so soulless to me.. have played every ac until syndicate, sadly this is another franchise with huge potential ruined by greed
Greed? The problem is not greed. Ubi just is not good at immersive worldbuilding that makes you care. The game looks amazing
@Alex M nah far cry 5 was sick imo
@@onnol917 "youtube gamers" only know how to blame things on greed. Thats all their small brain can process. Everything is generic and greedy.
The huge potential was already fulfilled by the earlier games.
@@omarcomming722 If you dont like these types of games dont play. Some people like long worlds to explore and play. But yeah I know am asking too much logic from the average youtube commenter.
I played it for a few hours, and the moment I saw the battle system and the assassination mechanics, it felt like I got hit with a mountain of slaps. The movement is terrible, and it's just smash, smash, smash -_- . And now I can't even refund it-I'm stuck with this game! I don't know, I enjoyed Odyssey a lot more. At least the conversations weren't so dull, and the cutscene animations were way better!
been playing this on hard difficulty and the stamina thing is exact opposite for me. I do like two dodges and the stamina is depleted, swing axe twice and stamina is depleted. My biggest mistake with this game is I started playing this immediately after finishing ghost of tsushima and apart from the environmental beauty everything else with this game has felt lackluster.
Ghost of Tsushima’s combat is one of the main reasons getting through this game felt absolutely dreadful. From one of the best to one of the least enjoyable melee combat systems ever
I hated GOT
@@gamerd8709 yea i hated game of thrones too. Ghost of tsushima on the other hand was absolutely fantastic 😎
@@oceanquest47 nah it wasn’t, very boring
@@gamerd8709 Sure sir, who am i to judge, its your experience. it might have indeed been boring to you. Well whatever charms your heart, have happy gaming !! Cheers.
Why do I feel like He's the only one who actually beat the game ?
He didn't beat the game though
"beating the game" lol
@@moriartythethird5709 11:10 - you were saying?
@@Erlisch1337 I was saying 1:30
@@moriartythethird5709 Im confused he said multiple times he beat the story. Couldnt that be a glitch or side quest story?
„Only restraint shows true mastery“
J.W. von Goethe
Ubisoft should consider this
Combat-wise, I found remapping the attack buttons from the triggers to the x, square etc made things a little more enjoyable, not much, but a little. 👍🏼
You know, ever since Ghost of Tsushima, I can't take anything after AC3 serious, GOT is the best 'assassins creed' we've gotten since Revelations.
So true
Tbh unity is actually really good since the bugs got patched I highly recommend the game if you like messing around in open world's
@@patrikmiles9342 even still it doesn't play right it's buggy and really inconsistent
What about Black Flag??
@@perseusthean6318 great game but it's more pirate of assassin, which is where it started, it's called assassins creed but assassins keep taking a back seat, it feels like they just keep making new ideas and attach the assassins creed name to make money
My favorite part of any Assassin's Creed game is when I lose interest and stop playing.
Haha, yeah it's like a relieving feeling when you can play a proper inspiring game instead.
Broo 🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀
this was literally me with Odyssey after I saw that list of quests after meting Pythagoras I lost the little interest I had and never played again
Honestly I only bought it as a time killer until Cyberpunk comes out. So I'll lose interest around December 9th.
@@Connor-km2sv playing through witcher 3 again for that exact reason
Honestly preferred the old super easy combat system.
Unity had the best combat
Combat in Brotherhood and Revelations was sick. Easy as hell but it felt realistic, satisfying and it looked great
@@Dhdhdyqha FACTS
@SN And parkour, the best parkour system ever in the series and only lasted a game smh
@@Dhdhdyqha Unity so underrated man, best Ac for me, its like hitman in France revolution
I bought it. I’m satisfied. If you’re an ADULT whose personality isn’t videogaming and all you do is game 1-2hrs on weekends. This is a good game. RUclips gamer nerds are killing the industry
Remember when Ubisoft tried adding RPG mechanics into Ghost Recon Breakpoint, a military shooter game?
How's that game going?
@@EmpireZzzz with the update and realistic mode, it aint that bad honestly. But its still a dookie game because of the story and boring world
M16VIU +60 Damage against rats -30 milisec reload time. HA!
Wildlands was better
Gear score got turned off straight away..
An Assassin's Creed game that is exactly like it's repetitive predecessor!?! No! Impossible! Ubisoft would never do such a thing!
@troll randon it really isn’t the skill tree is practically the same still has the perk skills barely even is about assassins creed spend hours to get xp to just do the main quest still have to kill a cult of people like in the last to assassins creed games everything i just said origins and Odyssey both had and Odyssey was known for being WAY to long and even added a skip game option cause no one in the community wanted to complete it the only thing i liked was odysseys Greek gods dlc and that was mainly because it was a completely different thing from assassins creed and i just like Greek mythology
@@LordBruuh you mean the story of 80% of the gaming industry thanks to the success of games like GTA, Witcher and Skyrim etc... If your problem is Ubisoft made an open world then guess what, we as the consumer asked for that many moons ago...
Also fyi the game itself doesn't play/feel like odyssey at all.
AC died with Ezio..
@@LordBruuh Ubisoft’s open worlds aren’t necessarily the problem for me. It’s mostly that they don’t bother trying to realise the setting and how there is no world building to make it actually feel immersive or alive. So their open worlds just end up feeling like playgrounds with checklists no matter how good they are.
@@LordBruuh Couldn't agree more. I mean, ubisoft also have their own unique game like the "old" AC games. They just dumped it for money.
I love Skill Up's reviews because he articulates his thoughts and opinions really well. Personally I loved Odyssey, so I'm pretty sure I'm going to enjoy Valhalla too. Because I know how he felt about Odyssey, I'd have been more concerned if he loved Valhalla, because it would have meant the devs would have changed a lot of what appealed to me about the previous installment. Still, it's good to hear his opinions and he always is honest and fair. His review of Outer Wilds made me pick it up and I loved that game. It's refreshing to have a review channel that can make passionate statements about games without feeling the need to be dismissive of player's themselves who have differing opinions.
Yeah, I'm going pick this up I'm pretty sure I'm gonna love it but I don't find this review surprising I'm actually glad it's longer. I don't hold his opinion against him, he's one of my favourite reviewers.
Yes I agree, people are very quick to judge on his reviews because they don’t want to be disappointed. At the end of the day he played 67 hours of Valhalla and finished it, while we did not. His criticism is worth listening to. You can make judgment based off what he says on whether you want to make a purchase based on your personal preferences. I personally do plan on playing Valhalla because I don’t mind his criticism as much (It is still a downside though). His review makes me feel comfortable buying this game on a sale down the line, and that is all I ask of a reviewer.
@@ethanwms He didn't finish it, he said it's too bloated lol
@@jasonthomas9729 Did you watch the video? He did. Your comment only proves my point further.
Having honest and strong opinions about a thing you review without being condescending with the deiffering views is what all reviewers should be like. It leaves room for people who disagree to know why they disagree and understand exactly how this game is or isn't for them.