Political Spectrum Explained | What is the Political Spectrum? | Left Vs Right
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июн 2024
- What is the Political Spectrum? | Left Vs Right
This video describes what a political spectrum is, and what it is used for. It goes into the most common political spectra called the Left-Right spectrum and what each side is in simplistic terms. It then charts out different political theories and ideologies, policies, and parties from the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Poland. Afterwards, it concludes with some caution about the left-right spectrum and why it is important to understand what it is when analyzing bias in the media, politics, and in yourself.
00:17 - What is a Political Spectrum?
1:06 - Where is it used?
1:49 - LEFT VS RIGHT
2:47 - Political Theories on the Political Spectrum
3:34 - Policies on the Political Spectrum
4:13 - Political Parties on the Political Spectrum
4:47 - It’s NOT Black and White
5:25 - Why does the Political Spectrum matter?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polit...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-...
www.dictionary.com/e/politics...
www.khanacademy.org/humanitie...
www.unifrog.org/know-how/unde...
#LeftVSRight #PoliticalSpectrum #Election2020
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to support more educational videos like this one! Thanks in advance! :)
Please remake this video.
Fascism is a form of socialism.
They are very anti market.... Until you made this statement your video was great...
If you're uncertain that fascism is on the left... Please let me help.
I'll give you a few ideas that will help you see how anti "laissez-faire" fascism was.
“If classical liberalism spells individualism,” Mussolini continued, “Fascism spells government.” - Mussolini
Fascist policies:
Mussolini:
8 hour work day
minimum wage
worker participation
management of industry had been given over to proletariat organizations
state secular education
progressive tax
confiscation of echlesiatical property and revenue.
Hitler:
Abolition of unearned income
confiscation of war profits
nationalization of corp
profit sharing in industrial enterprises
reconstruction of national public education so curriculum is brought in line with practical life
creation of a national press
prohibition and prosecution of newspapers who put out stories not conducive of national welfare.
More Evidence:
In his 1939 indictment of Nazism, Germany Rampant, Hambloch has an entire chapter on political parties under the German Empire before the First World War and political parties under the Weimar Republic. Hambloch lists parts of the “Left,” “Right” and “Centre” in the German Empire pre-1914, but there are no “Left,” “Right” or “Centre” parties in the Weimar Republic, but rather “Weimar Parties, i.e. those who supported the republican constitution,” “National Reactionary Parties” and “Revolutionary Parties.” The Nazis are listed, along with the Communist Party of Germany, as the two “Revolutionary Parties.” Pointedly, the Nazis were not considered a “National Reactionary Party.”
Clarification:
In 1930, Hitler tasked Hans Buchner to clarify what Nazi economic policies were. What did Buchner elect to call the economic policies of the Nazis? “State socialism.”
Socialist supported Hitler's rise to power:
Bernard Shaw and other Socialist supported Hitler. "While Parliaments get nowhere, Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin do things"
More Policies:
As the Nazis began to become a serious political party, in the 1930s, the Nazi deputies introduced a flurry of proposals:
1.To ban trading in stocks and bonds
2. To nationalize all large banks
3. To require registration of stock ownership with a state agency
4. To limit interest by law to five percent. (Bernie and Elizabeth Warren copied this)
5. To confiscate all profits acquired by inflation.
These measures were not hidden; they were trumpeted on the front pages of Nazi periodicals to ensure that party members knew what the Nazi Party in the Reichstag was doing. Some Nazi proposals sound eerily modern. The Nazis, for example, proposed that old age and disability benefits (Social Security) be paid out of general revenue, rather than from the contributions of the individual recipient, and that the benefits be indexed to the cost of living.
I didn't even know somebody can cover such a charged topic while being so unbaised
That’s because unfortunately social media has made it that way, but this is definitely a topic you can talk about being unbiased.
@@ntmn8444 I want to know this man's political beliefs and immediately switch to it. Unlike every other belief, he actually understands and accurately potrays the other side. A man with this amount of intelligence is UNSTOPABLE
That’s cus of social media influences that bash and promote campaigns exposing petty information. Fake news leads to bias views.
Left is for workers, right is for owners at leats thats how it is in europe
@@strafniki1080 that kind of makes sense
Thank you for this video and talking about how things aren’t so black and white. This is so important in today’s political climate, where everyone acts like you have to be either one thing or another. It’s not that simple!
For sure! I wanted to make that super clear for that reason.
It can be that simple, people like you just like to complicate things because you don’t understand
@@haza6893 Its not simple at all I hate both extremes ever heard of national bolshevism learn history.
@@American-Orthodox-Christian you say it’s not simple but it can (like most things) be categorised and there’s no reason why it can’t
@@haza6893 Well sure you can categorize ideology itself. But when you groups like the forest brothers which was communists, fascists, nationalists, pro democracy people, Anarchists all united and fighting against the soviets from 1942 ww2 all the way to the1960s and 70s its crazy. Or national bolsheviks which are heavily nationalist while believing heavily in communism, there flag is literally the same design as the german ww2 flag but instead of a black swastika its a black sickle and hammer on a white circle and red background. All I do is learn about military history I myself plan on joining the army and I learn most about ww2 even conflicts before it started like the spanish civil war and none of ww2 is black and white except the main countries that participated and even they are not always clear. There was polish resistance fighters who fought the nazis bravely for years only to be captured and executed by the damn soviets because they were quote “bandits”. So yea I no longer believe in the saying the enemy of my enemy is my friend when they will kill you after the main enemy is dead.
Overall, I think the 2 major party system in the US has created so many problems today. It seems as if either side will do whatever it takes to keep as much of the power as possible. A couple recent examples of this is the Democratic Party pushing the Green Party off the ballot in a couple of the very important swing states, and the Republican Senate pushing for a new SCOTUS nomination before the election, despite not even voting on Obama’s nomination, Merrick Garland, back in 2016. Like George Washington believed, if there were no parties things could be much better. It would also encourage people to do more research to learn about candidates rather than always voting for left or right.
The thing about America is that its just so populated. So many opinions.
But a one party system would never work because it’s very easy to start dictator ships
@@JulianRodriguez-ym9ww but a many party system would
@@JulianRodriguez-ym9ww Not a one party system. There needs to be more diversity.
Yes, I completely agree.
Just to correct something, the Right has never been considered Fascist until Google changed the definition. It was always Communism (Left) vs Capitalism (Right).
you are absolutely correct.Thats why i didnt feel right at the start.In india BJP is right but not facist
Well,Polish newspaper when Hitler become Chancellor called his government far-right, reactionary,and anti-social
It is political science which Create Modern definition of Left and Right
Depends on which version you use. The European horseshoe model has wings, with both eventually leading to totalitarianism, only real difference is which path is used to get there.
On the straight line model, extreme far right is anarchy (0% government / 100% individual rights and responsibilities, while the extreme far left is just the opposite (100% government / 0% individual rights and responsibilities)
The original Constitutional Republic of the US (20% / 80%) can not be placed on the horseshoe model, because it doesn't go low enough. The bottom of the horseshoe is democracy (50% / 50%) with both wings leading to more government power. This is a HUGE reason that the media constantly calls America a democracy- because it limits individual rights and responsibilities while advocating for more government control.
This youtuber just made him self look like a complete idiot
@@KainRocks777 you got it brother, you explained it better then this dummy on youtube
Wow I’m a lot closer to the center than I thought . Keep making these videos ! We need them
Same
I think I lean slightly to the right.
I was raised in an environment so strongly biased towards the left that I don’t even know what to believe anymore. That being said, It’s refreshing to see such an informative video and comment section for a change, rather than a mess of heated arguments and bias.
Thanks for watching! I appreciate it!
Were you raised in the USSR or Cuba?
JrEg explained it better.
And here I believed the shrink telling me I had a split personality disorder.
I love your channel and how unbiased you are. I was scared to search information about these political/economic philosophy’s at first because I thought people were going to sort of explain it in terms of their beliefs. But you do a very good job at giving a remarkably unbiased general view on each side you talk about (I like the historical context that you provide as well)
I'm glad you enjoyed it and found this channel!
I am a right centrist and i was a far leftist for a long time but soon realised being too woke in itself arises a lot of hypocrisy and since nobody can be completely centrist i see myself as a bit of conservative centrist which suits best according to me for my country politics
Very well explained and illustrated, making it easy for anyone like myself at 70 yrs of age to follow..
Thank you SO much for uploading this! And also explaining other countries leanings too.
All this political talk the past couple years has gotten me more interested in learning about how all this works. I’ve never really been knowledgeable enough on all this stuff to have solid stance on either side but I’m slowly learning which policies and parties I agree with more personally
This is an excellent video. You are right, Prof Zimmerman, that we need to better understand these topics and concepts ourselves so that we can combat media bias and make decisions based upon fact. I find it difficult sometimes to separate voting for the person and voting for the party. I wish both matched up perfectly but oftentimes they don't. Look forward to future videos! Keep 'em coming!
Shane Cragun thank you so much! You’re a great support to keep going. :)
🤣 he wasn't no where near right. He was wrong all the way in.
@@IllustratetoEducate that video was wrong. If your talking about a political spectrum in a linear fashion then this video was very misleading. Do your self a favor and actually read up on the what and how fascism is and started before you put that on the right and read it on a book, not on google. Its a similar construct as socialism. From left to right
8 monarch 7 dictatorship 6 fascist/communism/socialist 5 oligarchs 4 democratization 3 centralist 2 republic 1 libertarian. 0 anarchists. The far left equals 100% government 0% individual to then far right 90% individualism 10% government. Far right equals smaller government and far left is bigger government like communism when they want to control the means of production and have a all equal society, meaning your not rich but equally poor as everyone around you. And last, anarchists is 100% individualism and 0% government
@@ronnierabell1 I appreciate that you edited your comment from the original. I got the message loud and clear that you don’t like this video. Look forward to seeing your content someday so that I can understand this topic more clearly.
@@IllustratetoEducate that's a good idea, maybe I should
Thank you so much for these videos that only state FACTS and not opinions. 🖤🖤🖤
Thanks for watching! :)
Songs from the Political spectrum
Left: ruclips.net/video/GKvlt6rpb4Y/видео.html
Centrist: ruclips.net/video/NKoJDyKo1QQ/видео.html
Right: ruclips.net/video/N-T__wFK4pY/видео.html
Third Position: ruclips.net/video/H7znRvtnwVY/видео.html
Great information!!!! Thank you. I like how simplified it is for everyone to understand. That's all I ask when I am researching information.
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks for this . If only politics was explained this well all the time, we wouldn't feel so confused. I'm in my late 50's and it's taken all these years to try to understand politics, thanks to channels like yours we can all learn more .
That’s my goal! Thanks for watching the video and hopefully you find other videos on the channel to be just as helpful.
This was SO extremely helpful. Thank you!
Thank you very much! This helps me understand the political parties and spectrum much better!
Nice illustration, man!
One of the simplest explanations I've seen. I actually get it! The visuals help a LOT
I’m happy to hear that!! :)
Absolutely loved it! The best video out there on the topic.
Thank you!
Why do you have 9k subs? It should be 900k!
Haha someday hopefully. :) thanks!
not quite 900k, but his sub count has doubled from then!
Thanks a lot for making this video!!
No problem! Glad you enjoyed it!
This was awesome. With todays political climate throughout the world more people need to have this basic understanding. This video has definitely answered and raised more questions for me to dive in to, thank you.
You’re welcome! I’m glad you enjoyed it and found it to be helpful. 😊
Great video, I learned a hell of a lot!
I am an NDP here in Canada, that's similar to being a social democrat in the US.
excellent video, explained so clearly!
You switched the colors: Left is red, Right is blue.
I’ve seen it presented both ways. I chose to do it this way so that it was consistent with Democrats, who are typically represented in blue and left-wing, and Republicans who are typically represented in red and right-wing.
@@IllustratetoEducate Trump or Biden , who will bring China to Justice ??
@@IllustratetoEducate Put a video on that Bro ??
Dr Strange ’CMR that would probably go too far into opinion. Which is what this guy doesn’t like to show. I have no clue what party he associates himself with and I appreciate that
@@gaflippersofficial9007 ok da punda puridhu daa
I'd say I am a bit to the right of center.
Same
The left wil die
Michael Thompson that escalated fast...
Mr. Name iam goung to hunt them down and watch them sheep fall
Me too, when I took the political compass test it said I was in the middle but a small bit right liberitarian. I would say it’s pretty accurate
That's really informative and interesting.
thank you for explaining
Thank you for such a simple and lucid explanation.
I believe some things are wrong but the political spectrum can never be completely accurate
@Kelly Miles I don't believe that you can 100% calculate someones political views with a graph.
This really helped with my grade 9 final in social studies thanks
That makes me happy to hear! :)
I think my issue with this example is the left being associated with bigger government, which anarchists and left-libertarians definitely don’t fit yet is considered far-left. At the end of the day the left wishes to reduce hierarchy and the right wishes to enforce it.
Solid breakdown!
Thank you! I’m glad you found it informative 👍🏼
You explained it in a way that even a kid can understand. Thank you ❤️
Glad it was helpful!
"...in a way that even a kid can understand." A stinging indictment if ever there was one! I could hardly have said it better! Nonsense fit only for children!
What’s this? A well made, educated, informed, objective and unbiased explanation?
Well this is most unusual….
Once again I’m learning from your great illustrations and content!
I’ll tell you what it is, grossly updated. The stereotypical placing of Fascism in particular, despite it being a historical split off from Socialism and becoming its own entity, is a particular sore sticking point. Individual freedom or liberty scales versus authoritarianism are usually better as far as spectrums go. However, even that’s lacking.
Other than those two points, I still think you’ve made another great video.
Many disagreements in politics are simply caused by misunderstandings about what means what.
I’m quite into politics and still get confused on what people see as left and right wing
Right wing politics are all about attempting to stop the flow of time.
This is really informational
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Excellent explanation!!
Glad it was helpful!
Wow! This is unbiased bravo mate!
I've always wondered. Now I know. Thank you.
Happy to help!
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it
Good video.
Thank you 😊
good work
Nice I like the video you should make another one based on the Overton window
Interesting. I’ll have to look into that. :)
I love this video!
Very useful and helping to understand ur illustration method of teaching
Glad to hear that. Thank you!
What I find interesting is that, on a world stage, US politics mostly fall in the center and to the right. Meaning, if you were to plop the Democratic party (our "left-wing" party) in any other country, they'd probably be viewed as a centrist party, while Republicans would be a right-wing party. Bernie Sanders and the more progressive members of the Dems (i.e. the Democratic Socialists) would be your typical center-left to left-wing party, on a global scale.
Even more interesting, everyone outside the US flips the color scale. The left is red and the right is blue. Apparently, it was that way in the US until 2000 when the media decided to switch it up, and it's been that way since.
The US was founded on liberalism, with mainstream politics basically just being differences of opinions within the liberal tradition. There have been various socialist movements throughout US history, but they've always been fairly weak for various reasons.
I would say that the Democrats are generally center-right. Progressive faction in the Democratic Party is like center to center-left. (regarding economical issues)
I do not know where I stand on this understanding of the political spectrum.
I believe that all pollution, trash, waste, and sewage needs to be managed much better than it has been managed over the past 50 years.
Health and Safety
The USA needs to continue working on being a world leader regarding the management of pollution along with "Health & Safety".
Some of the ways mentioned on all sides may work. It depends on what the specific details are.
Thank you for sharing helpful and informative videos!
Yeah! All sides can be correct depending upon situations and perspectives but i think most people will disagree with the extreme sides to be true most of the times
Btw I am a right centrist and i was a far leftist for a long time but soon realised being too woke in itself arises a lot of hypocrisy and since nobody can be completely centrist i see myself as a bit of conservative centrist which suits best according to me for my country politics
Sounds left to me. 🤝🌹
Nice, Dude.
Thanks!
Gold! Thanks
You’re welcome! :)
These are so terrific. Thank you! (Definitely doing some strategic sharing to friends and family.) I think Fascism is really more of a tactic for growing and holding control of people through fear. It often starts with fear of the outsider, or some shadowy force that poses a risk to a certain segment of the population. If that force is defeated, the fascist retains power through a zero-tolerance policy on dissent. These practices can be used to further any ideology, regardless of their position on the political spectrum.
Really great perspective! Thanks for sharing and commenting! 🙏🏼
Thank you
You're welcome
I am voting today and I really needed that information. Thank you for your videos
You are so welcome!
real life explaindio. cool!
i wish we could dissolve these political sides and make decisions as one collective group of people. George washington really predicted our future
You are such a good teacher that it's making me even more interested in politics now. Keep it up.
Love to see a girl to watching political ideology videos
@@suriyamuthumani4128 thank you. But I think it's more about interest and the kind of environment you're living in, that influences your interests, more than being a girl 😅 thanks anyway!
@@farihalubaba0810 indeed
Democrats are on the right as well that's mistaken to think they are left leaning, they should be left but they are left of the Republicans but still right leaning
True! That’s a good point.
The problem with the democrats is that they have old outdated men and women.
@@manuelzamora3651 I mean same with the Republicans 😂 The Democrats are still more diverse but America is still run by rich white dudes
Cool subject
In politics, the dividing line between Right and Left can be traced back to two obsessions:
- the first (the torment of the Right) is a phobia of elements perceived to be incompatible with commonly used models in society
- the second (the bane of the Left) is intolerance of models that appear to be imposed by society.
In order to capture the meaning of these lines, we need to step back in time and recall the turmoil we experienced early in life as we began the process of blending into society when, as kids, we entered Planet School- or more precisely, Planet Classroom.
Right there in the classroom we’ve all had to deal with a “problem kid”: “bad Johnny”- the student with the disrespectful, smug attitude and less than decent grades, the kid in the back that stole your lunch money, the chronic late-comer who seemed to own a single tattered and over-doodled notebook, the bully you best avoided if you didn’t want to find yourself running home bruised and with a ripped school uniform. The hopeless case that once had the nerve to show his privates to the girl in the second row and who always came back from the boys’ room reeking of cigarette smoke.
No doubt that “bad Johnny” has raised concerns- more for some than for others- within the classroom/society. However, we can’t forget that other classmate of ours who is at the root of perhaps even more devastating issues- “Peter goody-two-shoes”. He came from a good family, he always sat in the front row, paid attention in class, gave a helping hand to less fortunate people, had good manners, dressed smartly, respected the teachers, sported perfect hairstyles and neatly organized books. The one who carefully put his school supplies away at the end of class, who always did his homework, who had the best grades- the one who came to school early each morning and couldn’t seem to wait to get started.
He was a model to look up to, our term of comparison when we sensed we couldn’t be good enough in the world of social competition. In fact, Peter popped up- in more or less obvious ways- any time our parents scolded us or our teacher criticized us.
And it was “Peter good-two-shoes” who really bothered us- especially when we felt his weight bearing down on our heads- a behavioral model imposed upon us by society.
It is of the utmost importance to note that, for the purposes of this “treatise”, “Peter goody-two -shoes” should not be considered “good” in an absolute sense- but rather a model society sees in a positive light (not always rightfully so) and, more than that, tries to impose upon us. Similarly, “bad Johnny” does not have to be the bad guy- rather just something society -often erroneously- considers negative.
You can see how Peter goody-two-shoes bothers people who are emotionally Left-wing, while an aversion to bad Johnny is the hallmark of Right-wingers.
- The idea that humans are intrinsically good belongs to the Left. In this case, “bad Johnny” is not a great danger to society. Leftist ideology borrows Rousseau’s belief that people are good by nature, even if at times they are led astray by society. It is noteworthy that “Peter goody - two - shoes”, the Left’s obsession, represents society and the model it demands to impose.
- The idea that some people are naturally diabolical is Right-wing: this belief derives from the suspicion that anyone could be a potential evil “bad Johnny”. In the Right’s vision, inspired by Hobbes, humans are evil by nature. They are always out to swindle, subjugate or rob others: hence the "Homo homini lupus" (man is a wolf for men) idea. In this case, it becomes society’s job to correct “bad Johnny” at any cost, if necessary by “sufficiently persuasive” means.
The “Peter goody - two - shoes” theory is therefore a sociologically relevant construct which delineates the meaning of the dichotomous conundrum afflicting each and every one of us in our relationship with society as a whole:
- On one hand, the refusal of models society itself endeavours to impose;
- On the other, the perception of elements not in line with the dominant paradigms as alien to society.
From the book “La morale del biasimo inverso” (The Moral of Inverse Reproach)
by Gianfranco Ardisson - edited by Nuova Stampa Color
Thank you :)
I think we can all agree that the political spectrum varies in each countries.
Yes I’d say that’s true!
Cracked at politics my guy
Cool informative video! still don't now if i'm more left or right haha! or both haha!
Still not see where did you explain clearly left and right. why fascism is together with freedom-supporting on the right? I’m not a native speaker. Could you explain? Thanks
I have only one problem with the video. The US democrats aren’t left wing they are center right(mostly)
That's a good point!
Democrats are left wing for modern standards
Real leftism like communism no longer exists as it is so far out of the realm of modern politics
It’s just simpler to not even consider it. Same with fascism. It’s never coming back under any circumstances
@@RUclipsUser-jb5zp What do you consider modern standards of leftism? The modern standard of leftism in the west is social democracy, which the democrats don't qualify as . The democrats are neoliberals, who are socially progressive and economically liberal. As for the fascism bit, I encourage you to take a look at right wing populism in Europe.
Democrats are leftists, look at politicians like Bernie Sanders and AOC they are very left-wing, support raising minimum wage to 15 hr, support welfare programs, wants to give us FREE healthcare and education, and raising taxes on the rich!!!
What is neo-liberalism?
Always unbiased. Extremely educational. Love it!
you are doing great man
don't stop the good work!!
Thank you! I will not stop! :)
Nice
Be like water, because water can take and flow in all different spectrums, it does not stick too long, it constantly move and adopts the forms and shapes of change.
We should share these with the kids
This good stuff
Moderate conservative here but I would see political parties flushed down the drain.
Washington never wanted them
You might not like them, but political parties are an inevitability in democracies.
My personal theory is the far left are people with daddy issues and the far right are people with mommy issues.🤣🤣
Actually if you think about the person who came up with Fascism which was Giovanni Gentile where Benito Mussolini succeeded his ideas, notice he was a Socialists back then way before he came up with fascism but he also had Nationalistic views and there was no other ideology that he could find that perfectly suits him because he supported government ownership of all property, he supported free healthcare and Education, but in the same time he supported Ethnic Nationalism meaning he thinks his ethnicity European White Arian was more superior and Independence and some other more Nationalistic views making him being Anti communists so he came up National-Socialism aka Fascism another term for it but smaller to put it into a little bit more sense. So I think Fascism is mostly on the Leftists side.
Did you even watch the video? Explaining that the spectrum wasn’t just a straight line. Fascism is literally counter to almost every left wing ideal and is widely recognised as a right wing philosophy. Don’t try and skew things like this. You’re not fooling anyone.
@@NOTCOLEADA Yeah like the Soviet Union allying with Germany to invade Poland, just because a group goes against another leftists group does not mean that they are part of the Right, there are multiple communists parties and militias including in Colombia that don’t like each other, there are varies different types of Socialism that is against other socialists, just because the FARC in Colombia is Communists doesn’t mean that they are allied with another communists insurgent group EPL, take the Spanish Civil war, there were syndicalist fighting against leftists, and the Anarchists Socialists, and the Communists fought each other which led to a weakness, Fascism leans to the left or even the right in some points.
@@NOTCOLEADA It’s crazy how your dumb enough not to know that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union are Centrists authoritarian countries that have ideas that lean to the right and the left, why do you think the Nazi party is originally named the National Socialists Party? Idiot, the only countries that represented the right and the left was during the Spanish civil war where Franco Spanish Nationalism vs the Republican Left trying to look like a democracy but they are just leftists acting like victims, while the Spanish Right wing Franco supporters supported dictatorship until Franco’s death they started to support democracy and Neo Nationalism by joining NATO.
Great video! You've got me as a subscriber now. As stated in the comments, way to stay unbiased on such a topic. Mostly commenting to leave a small constructive criticism. I was a little surprised to see Facism placed on the Right side of the spectrum as it's just a slight deviance from socialism. Both of which deeply rooted in communism. In the simplistic of explains, the word "facism" refers to a bundle of sticks used for support. Symbolic of people banding together as a communal collective. There is a lot of great info to explain this more elegantly than I have.
Fascism is left wing. The left just like to pretend it is to their right.
Fascism is right wing because of it's obsession with hierarchy and Fascists also privatized state run industry. Left is Socialism and Communism, Center is Capitalism and Right is Fascism broadly in terms of people who actually want the government to exist in the first place.
The very first people fascists go after are communists and then social democrats. Communists want equality of people all over the world and fascists want a hierarchy for themselves and every other person on earth to be dead or at least kicked out of their territory. The main difference in the ideology is one believes all people are equal (left) and the other believes that their group is superior to all others by nature (right).
Opps wrong video was looking for an audio test of left , right channel
I thought he said “hey I’m hanz Zimmer” 🎥 🎶
Just a distant distant relative. I wish...
Duality is our rock & hard place.
More than one,
No less than two.
Great presentation, may I suggest to slow it down a bit next time? I had a bit of trouble keeping up. lol
On android phones, you can actually slow down the video speed if you click the gear icon in the top right and find the playback speed option
on desktop you can just right click and change the playback rate
idk about iphones and macs
video starts at 1:53
Right!
Great video. I am stupid and I understood it.
This is best comment. It can be used on any video. Thanks!
This is an engaging video for anyone, actually considering the topic
So what if i agree with social equality, individual freedom and no government? am i rift? Or maybe legt...
This is amazing and so simplified!
Always thought the left meant more 'freedom' as the right is conservative (meaning more rules/governance). 2nd axis definitely makes sense
Yeah I had no idea what the fuck left and right meant before now
Nice👍still confusing😵💫
In the US you only have the choose between two right wing parties.
@Marcco I don't actually know who those politicians are mate as I am from the UK. My view is outside view of the two US parties, they are both of the right spectrum compared to other western nations.
@Marcco I just can't get behind the use of name-calling in American politics. It seems so... where to start?
Who do you support ?
I support the right btw :)
sir what do u think will happen if all the countries have the same political ideology?
War
@@Tetragramix Universal Global Communism, best outcome, Star Trek Future post scarcity.
i'm Swedish, and i dont agree to what the Social Democrats have done to my country.
I've been too young to vote until now.
And finally I have a voice within hte political spectrum.
With all the violence and shootings, I think that the migriation politics that we have had is far too leftist for our country.
And that's why i'm voting for the "Sweden Democrats"
The Right oriented party.
Equality and Equity are two very different things.
Look at the 50 cent troll army hot damn