Yeah they really weren't prepared for this. They were just used to men rubber stamping any and all "spending" that they ask for when asking for it. To defend their positions, they have never had to do that. And I'm quite sure after this, they felt that he "disrespected them" which (in their minds) they may misconstrue as domestic violence. This is what happens when you are not forced to think deeply about your beliefs in terms of facts as opposed to feelings.
So long as women turn a blind eye to violence against men, which is much more prevalent, I simply do not care if even one woman is given a black eye by her husband now and again.
sirskeptic exactly what I was thinking the fact that they constantly have to take notice all questions relating to men in every video means they don’t give a shit about men except their tax paying dollars to fund the shit lol crazy
Every single one of their answers was either deflection, a complete dodge, or damage control. Did you see how they physically reacted when he started giving the answers they said they didn't have? They knew about those answers alright but had deliberately ignored them because they didn't suit their agenda. That lot were horrified that Leyonhjelm and his staffers had done the research so he could come in prepared. They did not expect that one bit.
Good on you Senator Leyonhjelm, you should also have queried why "domestic violence" studies rarely, and it's rarely reported, the proportion of domestic violence carried out, by women, against children and men. Domestic violence discussions always concentrate on "domestic violence against women" with little if any reporting that in excess of 50% of domestic violence against children is committed by women. The "campaign" should be against "Domestic Violence" overall, not restricted to male actions against women. Political Correctness in full operation here, with "facts" stretched to provide a desired P.C. outcome to the "study". How can this "research" carry any authority, applying for taxpayer funds to further a female agenda.
Wyatt Family totally agree. Any approach on any given subject that only deals with a part of the problem should be throughly challenged. The exclusion of any significant concern about domestic violence against men and children seems to be widespread and seems to be politically motivated. The callous disregard for large numbers of victims of domestic violence is deeply troubling.
Because men rarely report it, and when they do the woman can just counterclaim and he will be punished anyway. Violence by women against men isnt taken seriously, in spite of the facts. "Straus argues that it is more harmful to women to attempt to tackle the problem of domestic abuse without proper strategy based on facts: "a meta-analysis by Stith and colleagues (2004) found that a woman's perpetration of violence was the strongest predictor of her being a victim of partner violence."
Define "violence" Women use "agression" in relationships....men often respond to agression with violence Men are very careful being agressive around other males...there are consequences So...if you're collecting data on who ends up bruised and bleeding in hospital...sure you'll see a gender bias But...if you collected data on agression....would you see a flip in that bias I suspect....anecdotally...you might
@@fountunes4495 I was surprised that they based their program on what people felt and not on the actions. The senator asked if violence is common and she said.. Well people are OK excusing it. That's not the same thing
Probably because logic is beautiful and its demonstration transcends national borders. There's something genuinely satisfying about seeing the distillation of truth.
I wish he'd brought up the biggest and best statistics that show women are overall about as violent toward their men as vice-versa. When I found that out I was shocked and it was a big part of my abandoning feminism after decades of claiming it as a logical part of my overall progressive politics.
Yep, otherwise why would White Ribbon Australia organisation bully Erin Pizzey the original founder of the first domestic violence shelter in the world out of her work?
I’d say with the knew changes around verbal abuse/ control/ money / repeatedly call -text NO MATTER WHAT THE CONTENT OR CONTEXT yeah I could easily see that would totally be the case
Almost painful to watch. These women have no support for their claims, as usual. Ill-prepared, stuttering fools. Thankfully, someone has the balls to fight them.
But since they targeted two of the least contributing factors to violence against women, they're sure to need more money, as the campaign won't have any measurable effect in actually addressing the actual root of the problem... Campaigns like this are very cynical, as they keep those women that are subjected to violence in that unfortunate position for longer than they would need to.
"We can't possibly take a hypothetical thing..." At the same time, we will happily categorize a phenomena reportedly occurring at a rate of 1.5% as 'common'... These people should be ashamed of themselves.
They should go to jail for misleading the public and stealing funds to promote their own ideology while dismissing evidence that contradict what they promote.
"Take it on notice" - I like how Senator Leyonhjelm made them all go away and do their homework, by requiring them to engage with the evidence that they deliberately and selectively chose to ignore prior to running that campaign.
This dude is a fantastic public advocate and investigator. He efficiently dismantled their ridiculous nonsense point by point and sent them packing with homework.
I wish he would move to the U.S. This is the first time I've seen an elected official when try to articulate the sensible side to this issue. The wage gap video similarly impressed me.
I saw a t-shirt a few weeks ago in a girl's clothing section. It said, "I have an important voice." Or something like that. I have a daughter and would never buy her anything like that. If you have an important voice you don't have to wear a shirt saying it. People will just know.
4:00 "Is Gender Inequality and Disrespect of Women at the heart of Violence Against Women as you have stated?" Answer: "No but they are among the factors driving Violence against Women" Then why have you stated these 2 points as the "heart of the issue" and where is the reference that proves your claim? How is it possible to state 2 factors are "at the heart of the issue of causing violence against Women" without any formal evidence and then backtrack on the outrageous statement by saying there are other factors that are relevant but never previously mentioned? What a charade! The comments of this bureaucrat Tracy Ball are a complete travesty of misstatements, illogical claims and lies.
She's obviously fully qualified in obfuscation and hyperbole, therefore a particularly valued ( and expensive) bureaucrat. And people wonder why government costs so much to do so little with OUR MONEY.
Last month a 5-year spanning research on domestic violence in The Netherland revealed something nobody expected: families where the man was the sole economic provider, experienced significantly less domestic violence against women. This speaks against gender inequality being a big contributing factor.
I've seen this vid in other areas, but this the best and longest upload I've seen yet. Without editing and additions. EXCELLENT WORK. I wish the senator had kept silent after a few of his questions and actually waited for their response instead of giving them an out. Definitely subbing this channel.
It is great to see the senator pointing out the discrimination against men. When it comes to domestic violence people do not talk about the physiological violence that women commit against men during relationship breakdown and family law disputes. This violence usually results in depression and suicide that is at pandemic levels amongst men into days society. In fact violence, whether domestic or street violence affects men more than women. The problem is our media which is run by feminists don’t want to highlight that because the truth goes against everything they have being saying for the last 5 decades. If we want to make an impact on violence then we need to treat it as a community safety issue rather than a gender safety issue.
What I wish I heard: "It seems to me that your campaign targets a problem that occurs to less than 2% of women, and your method was to prompt the public to address a cause of this violence which the United Nations has deemed to be a very small contributing factor. Among the goals of your campaign, were any of them to reduce partner violence against women, and if so did you only want to reduce it only a little bit, or as much as you could? From the data made available to the public, this campaign appears to be misdirected, inefficient, and/or disingenuous. The only measure of success it seems to have garnered is the acquisition of public wealth and public influence for your organization, and the social engineering for some purpose wholly separate than reducing violence against women my any notable measure. Could you comment on that?"
The senator is apparently a seasoned politician. He has to be careful with his words, and he clearly is. He does insinuate exactly what you're saying though, just less pointedly. I do believe that at some point taking things 'on notice' should stop. All the bureaucracy is eating taxpayer funds after all.
@@TimoRutanen taking things on notice is basically admitting that they didn't think to prepare a shaggy-dog-story or sufficiently evasive non-answer to that very simple question in advance and need more time to pull something out of their behind.
@@metallkopf988 Yes I know what it means. Sometimes it is warranted though so the system in general should allow SOME leeway on preparation. Not too much though as it of course costs time and money.
That man is like a machine. Evidence and facts wipe the floor with their 'feelings' they did no preparation for this meeting and cant even speak about citations they have used.
I just hope there are good people on the left that can do the same for the right. Both right and left have their share of looneys who go by their "truth".
mark mooroolbark Well.... you saw it, I saw it and all these people commenting saw it. It is freely available to see by anybody around the world. If you want it to achieve something then use the net to spread it around to others. Let Australia and the world see the fembots for what they are...... liars
That's the biggest problem with what feminism has become. It's like a hydra you can cut off one of its heads but the others are still spewing acid at you until the one you cut off grows back.
I was one of the 40m + viewers of that ad, I've since stopped beating women. Ad campaigns really do work, you guys! I think they should start doing anti-murder ads as well, would get rid of it all in no time.
After showing up late and completely disrespecting this process, To Mansplain it to you sunshine, the Senator is asking you why are you basing policy funding requests on feelings and not facts? It is a very simple question Feminists globally fail time and again to answer with credibility. Time to stop playing the victim card ladies and grow up. Every time you pedal this rubbish, Women in real trouble suffer.
8:28 "1 in 5 young people believe that a woman bears some responsibility for violent behaviour" I used to live next door to a violent couple and I can tell you, she was just as bad as him. they both took lumps out of each other and took it in turns to start it. She makes the assumption that women are always innocent in these things, but just as she wants equality she'll find out they are just as capable.
Yes. Both women and men can be violent. Feminism is based on an image of women as blameless victims and of men as scoundrels. Those are simplistic ideas which don't generate useful policies. Reading Rosie Betty's book really shows how mental illness is a factor and also how Batty's poor relationship skills and lack of common-sense made endangered herself and her poor child.
This guy is Great Right now Scott Morrison is the Best we've had in years - calling out islam and all This Senator Leyonhjelm will make a Great PM or President in the Future
This embarrassing session, and many others like it, demonstrate that women's studies is among the least rigorous of academic disciplines, pretty much at the bottom of the barrel along with other "disciplines" that end in "studies." The best they can come up with are really, really weak on analytical skills.
Im all for stopping it at the start: by punishing women appropriately who lie to, manipulate, and abuse their husbands on a daily basis. The vast majority of men who become violent in their homes do so because it is the culmination of years of unwarranted chastisement and misandry from the women in their homes
Tip for the "I can take it in notice" lady. Maybe being all evidence to the meeting rather than taking it all on notice in the hope everyone would forget.
Does anything actually get resolved here? He's asking the right questions, but the committee seems to be ignoring massive amounts of factors to a pretty serious issue.
Amazing that a senator can be forced to make the OBVIOUS statement that beating women isn't a good or desirable thing.. just amazing!! And shame on the woman that implied that he might not believe that!!!!!
Notice when asked about the "violence against women is common" she quoted instead a statistic about how people disregard "partner violence" not "violence against women". Considering how people brush off partner violence against men I wouldn't be surprised if those numbers were more about that (e.g. I'm sure he deserved it).
After watching this video my first thought was that these folks made a phone call to the WHO as soon as they left to inquire as to whether the WHO can include Gender Inequality as a factor in their next report.
This is great. He is making people base their actions on empirical evidence and it makes them so uncomfortable. It's a rare thing these days. I'm not sure enough institutions have someone who is prepared to put actual evidence ahead of a chosen narrative and poles about attitudes.
Right now it's Covid season and the calls on Facebook to protect women from domestic violence are pretty ridiculous. It would be so easy to frame it in gender neutral terms. But that's not how we do. Feninists are holding us back from true equality because what would they do if we had it?
1) he's not an enemy. He's only acting like one. Similar to a Drill Instructor who pushes his recruits to their limits or a good friend who argues with you. 2) Even though there are now men on the panel, the Senators methods and demeanor did not change. That's a good sign of character and honesty. 3) Part of a governments job is to consider the hypotheticals. To consider EVERYTHING as a means to protect its citizens. I think everyone with a brain has been in support of equality for the last 70 years. But to pick and choose the statistics one gathers is not a road to *continued equality*
To those watching from outside Australia this senator is one of only a few voices of common sense but for the most part these children that he's talking have taken over the narrative which is what you see being propagated in the Australian media.
I love watching this guy dismantle all of the social justice and gender equality proponents. Why is it that EVERY one of these subject matter experts have NO clue on how to answer his questions. He gives them advance notice on what he is going to ask them about and gives them the opportunity to send a reply prior to their testimony. Then he literally dismantles their premise and makes them look like idiots. WHY oh WHY is this Senator more informed than these "experts."
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
Those shameless women aren't used to be confronted, this man is a hero, and so incredibly calm and respectful.
That's exactly it; it's the entitled belief that no-one will ever hold them accountable.
Yeah they really weren't prepared for this. They were just used to men rubber stamping any and all "spending" that they ask for when asking for it. To defend their positions, they have never had to do that. And I'm quite sure after this, they felt that he "disrespected them" which (in their minds) they may misconstrue as domestic violence. This is what happens when you are not forced to think deeply about your beliefs in terms of facts as opposed to feelings.
I'm Canadian and I find this fascinating how this Senator seems very good at sniffing out bullshit.
Yea this guy is great at doing that.And you are smart canuck👌👍👍
American here and I wish he was president
I’m not to sure I’ll take that on notice, next question, I’m not to sure I’ll take that on notice!!!
A 5 year old could smell that bullshit from a mile away !
gabriel mansbach wish him and his party had a lot more people and seats in Australia there great and don’t need to make up bullshit to sell them self
I have to say I'm impressed by how measured and to the point this guy is.
The hero they need.
I think he can smell propaganda a mile away.
@@sinephase The Senator has a bull shit meter on his desk. LOL
He's the exact opposite of how the media portrays him. He's such a good bloke.
unfortunately, he is not relevant. Maybe he should do his own campaign.
When you copied your homework from another kid and the teacher calls you out.
Good one.
CrouchingWombatHiddenQuoll lmao
"Your work looks exactly like someone else's"
"Uuhh, I don't have those numbers with me. I'll have to take that under note."
He exposes the fraudulent nature of the DV campaigns and no-one gives a stuff. It is a bloody disgrace.
Well men up and down the country need to ask other: hey do you give a shit about this or not ? Women band together so why don't men ?
@N O holy fuck what kind of friends do you have.
@@jordanssfor Fuckin right?! Hahah
@P S :
Very true, unfortunately!!!
So long as women turn a blind eye to violence against men, which is much more prevalent, I simply do not care if even one woman is given a black eye by her husband now and again.
He picks apart arguments like a true scientist. We need more people like this as leaders on all sides
Hmmm it seems that the Fight Against Violence But Only Against Women were completely unprepared for anybody questioning them.
Spot on
"Fight Against Violence But Only Against Women By Men"*
They don't care about abusive lesbians.
@@smokydave which is the most abusive demographic according to data i believe.
Aeliuz Incorrect, Men are much more likely to be abused by Women. Children are nearly 10x more likely to be abused by Women than by Men.
sirskeptic exactly what I was thinking the fact that they constantly have to take notice all questions relating to men in every video means they don’t give a shit about men except their tax paying dollars to fund the shit lol crazy
The best part is when the one guy who hasn't said anything has the dignity to simply admit they were wrong.
This Aussie is great! I’d start watching American news again if we had someone like him in our House or Senate.
We need more of this man in this world.
I wonder why the Australian media has not put him and Jordan Peterson on a panel....
Every single one of their answers was either deflection, a complete dodge, or damage control.
Did you see how they physically reacted when he started giving the answers they said they didn't have? They knew about those answers alright but had deliberately ignored them because they didn't suit their agenda. That lot were horrified that Leyonhjelm and his staffers had done the research so he could come in prepared. They did not expect that one bit.
Good on you Senator Leyonhjelm, you should also have queried why "domestic violence" studies rarely, and it's rarely reported, the proportion of domestic violence carried out, by women, against children and men. Domestic violence discussions always concentrate on "domestic violence against women" with little if any reporting that in excess of 50% of domestic violence against children is committed by women. The "campaign" should be against "Domestic Violence" overall, not restricted to male actions against women. Political Correctness in full operation here, with "facts" stretched to provide a desired P.C. outcome to the "study". How can this "research" carry any authority, applying for taxpayer funds to further a female agenda.
Wyatt Family Hear Hear. And that Batty woman barely mentioned it
especially in non white communities. Just look at American blacks, getting beaten on 'by your mother is just accepted.
Wyatt Family totally agree. Any approach on any given subject that only deals with a part of the problem should be throughly challenged. The exclusion of any significant concern about domestic violence against men and children seems to be widespread and seems to be politically motivated. The callous disregard for large numbers of victims of domestic violence is deeply troubling.
Because men rarely report it, and when they do the woman can just counterclaim and he will be punished anyway. Violence by women against men isnt taken seriously, in spite of the facts.
"Straus argues that it is more harmful to women to attempt to tackle the problem of domestic abuse without proper strategy based on facts: "a meta-analysis by Stith and colleagues (2004) found that a woman's perpetration of violence was the strongest predictor of her being a victim of partner violence."
Define "violence"
Women use "agression" in relationships....men often respond to agression with violence
Men are very careful being agressive around other males...there are consequences
So...if you're collecting data on who ends up bruised and bleeding in hospital...sure you'll see a gender bias
But...if you collected data on agression....would you see a flip in that bias
I suspect....anecdotally...you might
Bravo once again Senator. Your questions are fair and pointed.Clearly these women are pushing a particular agenda.
I am not sure why I am watching an Australian senetor but I like his logic.
Abner Solano I agree with your comment on the senator, I am a women and wanted to see how Australia feminists portray in comparison.
@@fountunes4495 I was surprised that they based their program on what people felt and not on the actions. The senator asked if violence is common and she said.. Well people are OK excusing it. That's not the same thing
Probably because logic is beautiful and its demonstration transcends national borders. There's something genuinely satisfying about seeing the distillation of truth.
I wish he'd brought up the biggest and best statistics that show women are overall about as violent toward their men as vice-versa. When I found that out I was shocked and it was a big part of my abandoning feminism after decades of claiming it as a logical part of my overall progressive politics.
Yep, otherwise why would White Ribbon Australia organisation bully Erin Pizzey the original founder of the first domestic violence shelter in the world out of her work?
i left feminism too, they are the definition of hipocrysy and double standards
I’d say with the knew changes around verbal abuse/ control/ money / repeatedly call -text NO MATTER WHAT THE CONTENT OR CONTEXT yeah I could easily see that would totally be the case
You state a truth that is abhorrently ignored.
@@patricka.crawley6572 it's the biggest elephant in the room mate.
If men and women are equal why do women need special protection?
3 months later and the answer issss......because of votes that's
Something about being "less equal" or something will be the answer among others despite making no sense.
because some are more equal than others...
I'm going to take that question on notice....and never get back to you.
@@savyor9985 one of my favs is "you are unique, just like everyone else". Lol!
Watching this great man dismantle the shallow crap dished up by these & others is totally captivating
"Research" that begins with a conclusion rather than a question.
Almost painful to watch. These women have no support for their claims, as usual. Ill-prepared, stuttering fools. Thankfully, someone has the balls to fight them.
"A lot of people saw our ads therefore the campaign is successful"
If their ads were successful, why do they continue to block their comments section, which would allow the general public to air their concerns?
But since they targeted two of the least contributing factors to violence against women, they're sure to need more money, as the campaign won't have any measurable effect in actually addressing the actual root of the problem...
Campaigns like this are very cynical, as they keep those women that are subjected to violence in that unfortunate position for longer than they would need to.
They frankly don't care about actually solving the problem, they care more about the narrative and praise than solving the problem
Bravo, Senator!
What a morally bankrupt "crusade" feminism has become in this country.
"We can't possibly take a hypothetical thing..."
At the same time, we will happily categorize a phenomena reportedly occurring at a rate of 1.5% as 'common'...
These people should be ashamed of themselves.
Theres a word for these people... "cunts"
They should go to jail for misleading the public and stealing funds to promote their own ideology while dismissing evidence that contradict what they promote.
Women in power,feelings,Not facts,go woke go broke!
"Take it on notice" - I like how Senator Leyonhjelm made them all go away and do their homework, by requiring them to engage with the evidence that they deliberately and selectively chose to ignore prior to running that campaign.
Really wondering how the hearing after that went
This dude is a fantastic public advocate and investigator. He efficiently dismantled their ridiculous nonsense point by point and sent them packing with homework.
Senator: asks question requesting evidence for their conclusions
"I'll have to take that on notice..."
I just love how calmly he speaks
I wish he would move to the U.S. This is the first time I've seen an elected official when try to articulate the sensible side to this issue. The wage gap video similarly impressed me.
I second that. We need him in Texas
I don't think we can stop the global elites agenda
I doubt he'd be as successful in the US. There's a cultural difference on how things are handled, and how they are argumented.
woman demanding respect just make me respect them less.....
People demanding respect just make me respect them less.....
You can't demand respect. You have to earn it!
I saw a t-shirt a few weeks ago in a girl's clothing section. It said, "I have an important voice." Or something like that. I have a daughter and would never buy her anything like that. If you have an important voice you don't have to wear a shirt saying it. People will just know.
@@pedrorivera8255 bit that requires work and effort... you sexist pig
Leyonhjelm is the only real person in the Senate.
4:00 "Is Gender Inequality and Disrespect of Women at the heart of Violence Against Women as you have stated?" Answer: "No but they are among the factors driving Violence against Women"
Then why have you stated these 2 points as the "heart of the issue" and where is the reference that proves your claim? How is it possible to state 2 factors are "at the heart of the issue of causing violence against Women" without any formal evidence and then backtrack on the outrageous statement by saying there are other factors that are relevant but never previously mentioned? What a charade!
The comments of this bureaucrat Tracy Ball are a complete travesty of misstatements, illogical claims and lies.
👏👏 excellent comment my man 👍👌
She's obviously fully qualified in obfuscation and hyperbole, therefore a particularly valued ( and expensive) bureaucrat. And people wonder why government costs so much to do so little with OUR MONEY.
She just repeats her campaign slogans as if they are useful facts which they are not.
Those women are more concerned about their own positions than any truth....
He is a smart man. Because he reads what is there for what it is, not what it can be extrapolated into.
Last month a 5-year spanning research on domestic violence in The Netherland revealed something nobody expected: families where the man was the sole economic provider, experienced significantly less domestic violence against women. This speaks against gender inequality being a big contributing factor.
I've seen this vid in other areas, but this the best and longest upload I've seen yet. Without editing and additions. EXCELLENT WORK. I wish the senator had kept silent after a few of his questions and actually waited for their response instead of giving them an out. Definitely subbing this channel.
They probably just say they have to take it on notice, they have no reason or answers to their selective choice in their campaign
Gender inequality and disrespectful behavior, Hmmmmm. Are they talking about the way women often treat men?
The most amount of violence I’ve ever had committed against me was in fact by women. Including women that were supposed to be close to me.
"let's cherry-pick some causes to push a narrative"
I wish we could see their back room meetings. There is no way they are as ignorant as they make themselves out to be.
I love the way he calmly and politely takes them apart.
Owned! What a shame he is no longer a Senator for this great nation, we need more brilliant politicians like him,. 👌👈
This guy IS a legend. Salutations from Lady Justice in her American Branch, Senator.
It is great to see the senator pointing out the discrimination against men. When it comes to domestic violence people do not talk about the physiological violence that women commit against men during relationship breakdown and family law disputes. This violence usually results in depression and suicide that is at pandemic levels amongst men into days society. In fact violence, whether domestic or street violence affects men more than women. The problem is our media which is run by feminists don’t want to highlight that because the truth goes against everything they have being saying for the last 5 decades. If we want to make an impact on violence then we need to treat it as a community safety issue rather than a gender safety issue.
I completely agree.
What I wish I heard:
"It seems to me that your campaign targets a problem that occurs to less than 2% of women, and your method was to prompt the public to address a cause of this violence which the United Nations has deemed to be a very small contributing factor. Among the goals of your campaign, were any of them to reduce partner violence against women, and if so did you only want to reduce it only a little bit, or as much as you could? From the data made available to the public, this campaign appears to be misdirected, inefficient, and/or disingenuous. The only measure of success it seems to have garnered is the acquisition of public wealth and public influence for your organization, and the social engineering for some purpose wholly separate than reducing violence against women my any notable measure. Could you comment on that?"
I would have liked to hear that vocalized as well, but fortunately most observers can come to that conclusion on their own.
The senator is apparently a seasoned politician. He has to be careful with his words, and he clearly is. He does insinuate exactly what you're saying though, just less pointedly. I do believe that at some point taking things 'on notice' should stop. All the bureaucracy is eating taxpayer funds after all.
@@TimoRutanen taking things on notice is basically admitting that they didn't think to prepare a shaggy-dog-story or sufficiently evasive non-answer to that very simple question in advance and need more time to pull something out of their behind.
@@metallkopf988 Yes I know what it means. Sometimes it is warranted though so the system in general should allow SOME leeway on preparation. Not too much though as it of course costs time and money.
yea buddy im gonna have to take that on notice
That man is like a machine. Evidence and facts wipe the floor with their 'feelings' they did no preparation for this meeting and cant even speak about citations they have used.
I love how this gentleman is calmy dismantling the left ideologs with logic and facts. Keep up the good work!!!
I just hope there are good people on the left that can do the same for the right. Both right and left have their share of looneys who go by their "truth".
Good work Senator Leyonhjelm.
But ultimately, what did he achieve? The feminist machine rolls on unimpeded and unaccountable.
mark mooroolbark Well.... you saw it, I saw it and all these people commenting saw it. It is freely available to see by anybody around the world.
If you want it to achieve something then use the net to spread it around to others.
Let Australia and the world see the fembots for what they are...... liars
TheAfrikaKorps No but there's real bullet solutions ;)
That's the biggest problem with what feminism has become. It's like a hydra you can cut off one of its heads but the others are still spewing acid at you until the one you cut off grows back.
I was one of the 40m + viewers of that ad, I've since stopped beating women. Ad campaigns really do work, you guys! I think they should start doing anti-murder ads as well, would get rid of it all in no time.
"1.5% doesn't meet my definition of common."
The end. What video will RUclips recommend now?
After showing up late and completely disrespecting this process, To Mansplain it to you sunshine,
the Senator is asking you why are you basing policy funding requests on feelings and not facts?
It is a very simple question Feminists globally fail time and again to answer with credibility.
Time to stop playing the victim card ladies and grow up. Every time you pedal this rubbish,
Women in real trouble suffer.
It's disgusting and nothing more than propoganda. Tax payer money spent by people who don't know what the fuck they are doing
I like how the women have binders full of studies, talking points and presentations and the senator out plays them with 2 pieces of paper.
8:28 "1 in 5 young people believe that a woman bears some responsibility for violent behaviour" I used to live next door to a violent couple and I can tell you, she was just as bad as him. they both took lumps out of each other and took it in turns to start it. She makes the assumption that women are always innocent in these things, but just as she wants equality she'll find out they are just as capable.
Yes. Both women and men can be violent. Feminism is based on an image of women as blameless victims and of men as scoundrels. Those are simplistic ideas which don't generate useful policies. Reading Rosie Betty's book really shows how mental illness is a factor and also how Batty's poor relationship skills and lack of common-sense made endangered herself and her poor child.
Even though I’m an American, I feel like contributing to his campaign
My god how they Lie. Call them liars, be honest.
He's a politician. It's probably against the unwritten ground rules of politics. It is over here at least.
They were getting pissed of over being questioned
This guy is Great
Right now Scott Morrison is the Best we've had in years - calling out islam and all
This Senator Leyonhjelm will make a Great PM or President in the Future
This senator is perfect for this role. Clearly manipulating data to receive a positive result for their personal agenda
How can someone turn up to a hearing like this and be so unprepared!!!
What's your name?
I'll have to take that on notice
Thank you David 👍🙏
respect is earned !!!
This embarrassing session, and many others like it, demonstrate that women's studies is among the least rigorous of academic disciplines, pretty much at the bottom of the barrel along with other "disciplines" that end in "studies." The best they can come up with are really, really weak on analytical skills.
That guy is a legend. He deserves the Purple Cross. Who would hold these terrible people to account if it wasn't for him?
Senator Lionhelm 😍 I pray for him tonight and that God will enlarge his influence and territories
You need to share this
I love this guy!!! Australia you guys need to. Pay attention to this
Senator Lyon is at the helm!
Vote for this man for world president!
Can we (non-Australians) borrow him once in a while?
Seen a few vid's with this man and he's a glowing light in a dark world.
Red breathed a huge sigh of relief when the questioning was over, we could use more discourse like that in the U.S.
Holy shit. If only all politicians would be this sharp, hard working and methodical we could all sleep our nights in peace. Must be one in a million.
Im all for stopping it at the start: by punishing women appropriately who lie to, manipulate, and abuse their husbands on a daily basis. The vast majority of men who become violent in their homes do so because it is the culmination of years of unwarranted chastisement and misandry from the women in their homes
Senator Leyonhjelm is a beacon of sanity amidst a sea of irrational feminism. Great respect.
Tip for the "I can take it in notice" lady.
Maybe being all evidence to the meeting rather than taking it all on notice in the hope everyone would forget.
"did you abuse your wife?"
"id like to take that question on notice"
Love the way he handles this, we need him here in here in the USA. He'd make a great president
she's completely unprepared, and incapable of defending her stance.
Hard to defend something that you know is bullshit
You can tell its an Australian video due to the 240p upload. Took them 8 weeks, but they finally uploaded it!
Does anything actually get resolved here? He's asking the right questions, but the committee seems to be ignoring massive amounts of factors to a pretty serious issue.
Amazing that a senator can be forced to make the OBVIOUS statement that beating women isn't a good or desirable thing.. just amazing!! And shame on the woman that implied that he might not believe that!!!!!
Notice when asked about the "violence against women is common" she quoted instead a statistic about how people disregard "partner violence" not "violence against women". Considering how people brush off partner violence against men I wouldn't be surprised if those numbers were more about that (e.g. I'm sure he deserved it).
We need this guy in the US!
This both cheers me up and makes me sad
After watching this video my first thought was that these folks made a phone call to the WHO as soon as they left to inquire as to whether the WHO can include Gender Inequality as a factor in their next report.
This is great. He is making people base their actions on empirical evidence and it makes them so uncomfortable. It's a rare thing these days. I'm not sure enough institutions have someone who is prepared to put actual evidence ahead of a chosen narrative and poles about attitudes.
This senator is bad ass MF, brilliant, GREAT, GREAT MAN !!!
If NSW Sen. Leyonhjelm ever meets US Rep. Trey Gowdy it would create a paradox called “logical government”
And violence against Men and Boys is what....?!?! Just ignored.
Right now it's Covid season and the calls on Facebook to protect women from domestic violence are pretty ridiculous. It would be so easy to frame it in gender neutral terms. But that's not how we do. Feninists are holding us back from true equality because what would they do if we had it?
1) he's not an enemy. He's only acting like one. Similar to a Drill Instructor who pushes his recruits to their limits or a good friend who argues with you.
2) Even though there are now men on the panel, the Senators methods and demeanor did not change. That's a good sign of character and honesty.
3) Part of a governments job is to consider the hypotheticals. To consider EVERYTHING as a means to protect its citizens.
I think everyone with a brain has been in support of equality for the last 70 years. But to pick and choose the statistics one gathers is not a road to *continued equality*
Great work Senator.
can i say to the police when stopped , i will take it on notice..
If you need to explain when it's a yes or no answer questions means the question caught you.
A confident and docile gaze in their eyes as they assumed the hive had already taken care of any tricky legwork.
This guy so correct and professional
I have to take that on notice
To those watching from outside Australia this senator is one of only a few voices of common sense but for the most part these children that he's talking have taken over the narrative which is what you see being propagated in the Australian media.
this guy is brilliant
All I heard was : I take the fifth and decline to answer, on the grounds that it might incriminate me (or my agenda).
I love watching this guy dismantle all of the social justice and gender equality proponents. Why is it that EVERY one of these subject matter experts have NO clue on how to answer his questions. He gives them advance notice on what he is going to ask them about and gives them the opportunity to send a reply prior to their testimony. Then he literally dismantles their premise and makes them look like idiots. WHY oh WHY is this Senator more informed than these "experts."
My father was nearly killed by his wife. No one cared. If it happened today, no one would care.
Very sharp.
He did his own homework.
He didn't just rely on someone else's report or ideas.