I am a "woman of a certain age" (old), and I sold/gifted/donated my "real" photography equipment a few years ago. After all, as someone who's in my seventh decade of life, why would I need all of this stuff? My iPhone Pro Max was just fine. A few filters, a gimbal, and I was on my way. And then the opportunity to do some serious traveling came up, and I decided to splurge and just get a real camera and lens again. I haven't traveled yet (it's scheduled!) but I purchased a Nikon D 7500 and this lens. I also purchased a 35 mm prime lens. as I "relearn" old skills, I can't wait till my travel starts. While I love the results I've gotten from my iPhone, even I know that it won't be able to measure up to a Nikon, and being able to use a moderate telephoto while looking at elephant seals on the beach will give me that little bit extra I need to make my photos stand out.
I have this lens on a D7100, with a 2 year old grandson this is the perfect tool for family photos in and outdoors. This is most defeatedly a lens that works well under the "f/8 and be there" mantra.
I just replaced my 18-55 & 55-200 with this lens and I'm very happy! Better build and feel, metal mount, amazing VR and accurate focusing. Keep the aperture at 5.6 or narrower and sharpness is great!
@@user-bq9uu1sh2v the difference in reach between 140 and 200 is not much at all IMO, but the practicality of not swapping between 18-55 and 55-200 is pretty great I didn't compare the two at 140 but the 18-140 is very sharp and so was my 55-200 I preferred the bokeh on the 55-200 but you can't have it all I guess
Hi, I have a D3300 with kit lens 18 55mm and I want a flexible lens that allows me to take pictures to people with a nice bokeh effect and while travelling. Do you recommend this replacement, or maybe another lens? :)
I got one with my d7200 I also have the 18-55 f2.8 and 70 200 2.8d and I am very happy with the results, even in the corners wide open at 140mm, pixel peeping the image holds up at 400% the image is usable, at 500% it becomes pixelated so I conclude the lens is not the limit so I'm impressed it lacks the magic of the 70-200 but it is fine for general use. i think it is a victim of "only a kit lens snobbery" not my first choice for a serious portrait but i do think this lens is under appreciated and not far behind the best. I also have a 90, 2.8 and a 50 1.4. better than i usually need
You just gained another sub! getting a perspective from you has been very helpful as a hobbyist and not trying to touch photography in professional level.
This lens works really well on D3500, D5600, D7500 and D500. The lens is designed for these so called DX cameras. The 18-140 on a DX camera gives X1.5 crop, meaning that you have 27-210mm focal length Full Frame equivalent. Seriously you can do 90% of your photography with one of these cameras and this lens. DX lenses are much cheaper than Full Frame equivalent lenses, so for non-Professional photographers, mums and Dads, travel, landscape, architecture, event photography, nature, this lens is great. If small aperture and slow shutter speeds is a problem, get a decent tripod like Manfrotto or equivalent. Just never fully trust your tripod and be ready to catch your camera should a tripod leg slip. Cheers
You're right, a DX camera will do for most purposes. Artistically speaking, there is of course little leeway with depth of field due to the variable aperture of this lens combined with an aps-c camera.
Such an amazing truthful review, you've convinced me to purchase this lens. I've always been passionate about photography, but never really got into it until recently. I started doing food photography, and then everything else. I will order it, at the moment I am using the D5000, I'm sure this will pair well with that. Thank you
Well I've had mine many years now and still use it on my new D780 when shooting an event and want the extra reach but don't want to bother with the heavier 80-200 f2.8 which I prefer using during wedding shoots.
Excellent review! I own this lens and it is an awesome performer! I use for street photography primarily. D500 body. Other lenses I own are Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Nikon 40mm f2.8 macro, Nikon 105mm f2.8 macro, Nikon AF-P 70-300mm E VR
Same as me, I use it a lot for street shooting on a D500. I'm always impressed how well it does stopped down 1 stop; obviously not in the same class as my 70-200 2.8 VRii, but a lot less conspicuous and that wide end is essential for most street work. I just won an award with it too. VR is noticably better than the older 16-85 I replaced with this lens. If you want to enjoy some of the benefits of DX, this compact superzoom is great value for it's range and quality.
Thank you for your high quality review! I am using the 18-140mm on my D7200 body, esp. during hollidays with friends, when capturing the moments is of high priority. I love its zooming capacity, VR and fast autofocus. Still have to buy a lens hood, since this was not included; does it increase the quality? The 18-140 mm complements my other lenses being Nikon 35 mm, 80-400mm (first edition) and my latest purchase, a high quality second hand Nikon 200-500mm.
This is the lens that came on my D-7200. I think it is ok... not the best and I know it. But then... I am a hobby photography guy... none of my photography is seen by anyone, no one cares, so it doesn't matter.
Thank you for this review. I own this lens since many years and almost never use it. It is heavy 490gr and big 97mm closed. I trued hard to get use to it but carrying it with the camera all day long during my holidays trip is a real pain, also because it is huge it get attention from the security in some places and got banned. Also due to the size and weight it bounce around and get hits. Maybe it is a great lens for those who only use it at home for the family pictures or not travelling all day or occasional photographer I use the prime 35mm 200gr. One lens for everything and take fantastic pictures at night 😊 no struggle. If I need wide angle I use my phone.
Thanks for your comment. That 35mm f/1.8 g is a fun little lens to carry around. Sure the 18-140mm is lot bigger but I’ve found it relatively light to carry. A phone however does not inspire me to get out and take photos.
I bought it as a kit lens for z30, not gonna lie, I don't really know much about anything but I "thought" since z30 isn't really cam with fast AF or IBIS or even EVf, the 50-250 option would be mostly difficult to use for me for any real wildlife kind of thing, even just as an introduction, 16-50 had a great appeal to me as I do think these 2 mm's are going to make a difference, but then I thought if I really get into it, I could buy one perfect ( referring for my use case and not actual lens) prime lens in the future, many cheap 3rd party options available too. So opted for a great deal of around $900 for z30+Nikkor 18-140mm option as that would serve my jack of all trades purpose. I do think I would eventually need to move on to a great prime lens, though not really sure which one just yet. Preferably, Nikon as lens needs to have some good complimenting stabilizing effect on photos, rather than entering into a mess where neither the body nor the lens really have any image stabilization. So not really sure about Viltrox and Sigma options "right now", so will just wait.
@@WimBals Any lens would you suggest to me in current Nikon's DX line for prime? I'm thinking of 33mm but not yet sure, will need a first-hand experience person to guide.
@@WimBals Okay, but would it have any issues with image stabilization in hand held situations, as Z30 doesn't have IBIS? I don't know if there is any technology/stepping motor used by Viltrox, so asking, please don't mind my inquisitive nature. And thank you for the suggestion, will keep an eye out!
what i would recommend is get the 70-300mm afp instead, so that now you will have 18-55mm lens for general purpose - group photos, birthday parties 70-300mm afp for portraits, wildlife, planes 18-140mm only makes sense if you dont want to bother with changing lens so much, but thats the point of dlsr another recommendation would be to get, sigma 2.8 17-50 which is direct upgrade on kit lens: it's way shaper and a better lens for low light and afp 70-300mm, which is my setup (note: make sure your camera is compatible with 3rd parties lens though)
@@WimBalshi, I have a D3300 with kit lens 18-55 afp but want a better all-rounder lens that allows me to take better portrait photos. Do you recommend this change? Thank you
This lens is good for beginners and photography enthusiastic......not for professional.......but can u suggest best night streat photography settings of this lens plz......
With its VR it is a great lens for night street photography. You can use slow shutter speeds, even 1/15s. To keep the iso low. My other tips: - Shoot RAW - Use burst mode - Keep the aperture wide open - Underexposure your photos a little - Keep the iso low but don’t be afraid for some noise Hope this helps.
I am a "woman of a certain age" (old), and I sold/gifted/donated my "real" photography equipment a few years ago. After all, as someone who's in my seventh decade of life, why would I need all of this stuff? My iPhone Pro Max was just fine. A few filters, a gimbal, and I was on my way. And then the opportunity to do some serious traveling came up, and I decided to splurge and just get a real camera and lens again. I haven't traveled yet (it's scheduled!) but I purchased a Nikon D 7500 and this lens. I also purchased a 35 mm prime lens. as I "relearn" old skills, I can't wait till my travel starts. While I love the results I've gotten from my iPhone, even I know that it won't be able to measure up to a Nikon, and being able to use a moderate telephoto while looking at elephant seals on the beach will give me that little bit extra I need to make my photos stand out.
Great story, I hope you enjoy your traveling and capture some great memories!
I have this lens on a D7100, with a 2 year old grandson this is the perfect tool for family photos in and outdoors.
This is most defeatedly a lens that works well under the "f/8 and be there" mantra.
Capture those great moments!
I just replaced my 18-55 & 55-200 with this lens and I'm very happy! Better build and feel, metal mount, amazing VR and accurate focusing. Keep the aperture at 5.6 or narrower and sharpness is great!
It's a great allrounder lens.
Hey whats the practical difference between 140mm and 200mm and is tge telephoto om 55-200mm sharper than 18-140mm??
@@user-bq9uu1sh2v the difference in reach between 140 and 200 is not much at all IMO, but the practicality of not swapping between 18-55 and 55-200 is pretty great
I didn't compare the two at 140 but the 18-140 is very sharp and so was my 55-200
I preferred the bokeh on the 55-200 but you can't have it all I guess
Hi, I have a D3300 with kit lens 18 55mm and I want a flexible lens that allows me to take pictures to people with a nice bokeh effect and while travelling. Do you recommend this replacement, or maybe another lens? :)
I got one with my d7200 I also have the 18-55 f2.8 and 70 200 2.8d and I am very happy with the results, even in the corners wide open at 140mm, pixel peeping the image holds up at 400% the image is usable, at 500% it becomes pixelated so I conclude the lens is not the limit so I'm impressed it lacks the magic of the 70-200 but it is fine for general use. i think it is a victim of "only a kit lens snobbery" not my first choice for a serious portrait but i do think this lens is under appreciated and not far behind the best. I also have a 90, 2.8 and a 50 1.4. better than i usually need
100% Agree.
You just gained another sub! getting a perspective from you has been very helpful as a hobbyist and not trying to touch photography in professional level.
Thanks a lot!
Whoa, look at You New Sub! 😆
This lens works really well on D3500, D5600, D7500 and D500. The lens is designed for these so called DX cameras. The 18-140 on a DX camera gives X1.5 crop, meaning that you have 27-210mm focal length Full Frame equivalent. Seriously you can do 90% of your photography with one of these cameras and this lens. DX lenses are much cheaper than Full Frame equivalent lenses, so for non-Professional photographers, mums and Dads, travel, landscape, architecture, event photography, nature, this lens is great. If small aperture and slow shutter speeds is a problem, get a decent tripod like Manfrotto or equivalent. Just never fully trust your tripod and be ready to catch your camera should a tripod leg slip. Cheers
You're right, a DX camera will do for most purposes.
Artistically speaking, there is of course little leeway with depth of field due to the variable aperture of this lens combined with an aps-c camera.
Will it work good with my Nikon D5300
Tacole, yes it will work with your D5300.
Such an amazing truthful review, you've convinced me to purchase this lens. I've always been passionate about photography, but never really got into it until recently. I started doing food photography, and then everything else. I will order it, at the moment I am using the D5000, I'm sure this will pair well with that. Thank you
Good luck with this versatile lens!
Well I've had mine many years now and still use it on my new D780 when shooting an event and want the extra reach but don't want to bother with the heavier 80-200 f2.8 which I prefer using during wedding shoots.
Wonderful review sir... I used this lens most of the time. Images are very good. But compare to 50mm 1.8G, prime lens image quality is good.
Thanks 😊
Thanks for a very clear and straight to the point review u helped to make up my mind on buying this lens
Glad I could help ☺️
Excellent review! I own this lens and it is an awesome performer! I use for street photography primarily. D500 body. Other lenses I own are Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Nikon 40mm f2.8 macro, Nikon 105mm f2.8 macro, Nikon AF-P 70-300mm E VR
Thanks for your comment.
With your collection of lenses you have a nice range, coupled with a good camera.
Same as me, I use it a lot for street shooting on a D500. I'm always impressed how well it does stopped down 1 stop; obviously not in the same class as my 70-200 2.8 VRii, but a lot less conspicuous and that wide end is essential for most street work. I just won an award with it too. VR is noticably better than the older 16-85 I replaced with this lens. If you want to enjoy some of the benefits of DX, this compact superzoom is great value for it's range and quality.
Just purchased used. Love it so far.
It's a great allround lens !
One of the best for this Len reviews. Thanks.
Thank you so much!
Thank you for you nice review. I think I will purchase this lens since I'm on a budget.
Good luck!
yes really worth, i have one and it was great specially outdoor
Thanks for your comment
Thank you for your high quality review! I am using the 18-140mm on my D7200 body, esp. during hollidays with friends, when capturing the moments is of high priority. I love its zooming capacity, VR and fast autofocus. Still have to buy a lens hood, since this was not included; does it increase the quality? The 18-140 mm complements my other lenses being Nikon 35 mm, 80-400mm (first edition) and my latest purchase, a high quality second hand Nikon 200-500mm.
Thank you. I wouldn't mind the lens hood, I have it myself but never use it.
Take the older 18-105mm VR. That one is sharper in the centre and better in the corners
Sometimes the extra reach can be beneficial.
I'm just an amateur and thank you for this clear and detailed explanation. Absolutely love your comparisons with the prime lens!
Glad I could help
Excellent video 😊!
Thank you!
My most used lens on my D5600
It is a very versatile lens and yet fairly compact.
This is the lens that came on my D-7200. I think it is ok... not the best and I know it. But then... I am a hobby photography guy... none of my photography is seen by anyone, no one cares, so it doesn't matter.
The most important person for whom you shooting pictures is yourself.
This lens can do a great job.
With good lighting this lens is the best since if you help yourself with lighting you will have professional photos! Don't underestimate this lens
Thank you for this review.
I own this lens since many years and almost never use it.
It is heavy 490gr and big 97mm closed. I trued hard to get use to it but carrying it with the camera all day long during my holidays trip is a real pain, also because it is huge it get attention from the security in some places and got banned.
Also due to the size and weight it bounce around and get hits. Maybe it is a great lens for those who only use it at home for the family pictures or not travelling all day or occasional photographer
I use the prime 35mm 200gr. One lens for everything and take fantastic pictures at night 😊 no struggle. If I need wide angle I use my phone.
Thanks for your comment.
That 35mm f/1.8 g is a fun little lens to carry around.
Sure the 18-140mm is lot bigger but I’ve found it relatively light to carry.
A phone however does not inspire me to get out and take photos.
Hello sir, thank you for your good review. my question is could I use this lens with my Nikon D60 camera?
This is an AF-S lens en should work on your D60 camera.
I have default lens with camera nikon 16-55
Which better to buy 55-200 lens or 18-140? I capture beaches and street , travel
The 18-140mm is a really nice lens. The 55-200mm is a lens to avoid.
¿Can I use it with a d3100?
Yes you can use this lens.
I bought it as a kit lens for z30, not gonna lie, I don't really know much about anything but I "thought" since z30 isn't really cam with fast AF or IBIS or even EVf, the 50-250 option would be mostly difficult to use for me for any real wildlife kind of thing, even just as an introduction, 16-50 had a great appeal to me as I do think these 2 mm's are going to make a difference, but then I thought if I really get into it, I could buy one perfect ( referring for my use case and not actual lens) prime lens in the future, many cheap 3rd party options available too. So opted for a great deal of around $900 for z30+Nikkor 18-140mm option as that would serve my jack of all trades purpose.
I do think I would eventually need to move on to a great prime lens, though not really sure which one just yet. Preferably, Nikon as lens needs to have some good complimenting stabilizing effect on photos, rather than entering into a mess where neither the body nor the lens really have any image stabilization. So not really sure about Viltrox and Sigma options "right now", so will just wait.
Good luck!
I would stick with Nikon lenses for the most part of it.
@@WimBals Any lens would you suggest to me in current Nikon's DX line for prime? I'm thinking of 33mm but not yet sure, will need a first-hand experience person to guide.
The Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 is a smart ‘standard prime’ for wide-ranging APS-C format mirrorless cameras.
@@WimBals Okay, but would it have any issues with image stabilization in hand held situations, as Z30 doesn't have IBIS?
I don't know if there is any technology/stepping motor used by Viltrox, so asking, please don't mind my inquisitive nature. And thank you for the suggestion, will keep an eye out!
You can also use the ftz-adapter for f-mount lenses. The Tamron 35mm has vibration reduction .
So the object 18-140mm better than 24-70mm
The 24-70 f/2.8 is far superior to the 18-140 mm.
Of course, that lens is a lot more expensive, heavier and you have less range.
I have Nikon D3500 with kit lens 18-55mm lens. I want to upgrade lens.Can compabilty with this 18-140mm lens ?
The d3500 should work fine with the 18-140mm. In terms of quality, if you have the 18-55mm af-p version it is roughly the same.
If u have 18-55mm and 18-140mm then u won’t need 18-55mm, maybe u could look at better pairing
what i would recommend is get the 70-300mm afp instead,
so that now you will have 18-55mm lens for general purpose - group photos, birthday parties
70-300mm afp for portraits, wildlife, planes
18-140mm only makes sense if you dont want to bother with changing lens so much, but thats the point of dlsr
another recommendation would be to get, sigma 2.8 17-50 which is direct upgrade on kit lens: it's way shaper and a better lens for low light and afp 70-300mm, which is my setup
(note: make sure your camera is compatible with 3rd parties lens though)
@@WimBalshi, I have a D3300 with kit lens 18-55 afp but want a better all-rounder lens that allows me to take better portrait photos. Do you recommend this change? Thank you
Is it compatible to D3200?
Yes, no problem.
Pretty good lens, not great, but versatile .. ive made money with images used by this lens
Sure, there are better lenses, but this is a very good all round lens .
This lens is good for beginners and photography enthusiastic......not for professional.......but can u suggest best night streat photography settings of this lens plz......
With its VR it is a great lens for night street photography. You can use slow shutter speeds, even 1/15s. To keep the iso low.
My other tips:
- Shoot RAW
- Use burst mode
- Keep the aperture wide open
- Underexposure your photos a little
- Keep the iso low but don’t be afraid for some noise
Hope this helps.
@@WimBals thanks for ur tips I will apply soon....
Another good lens to buy Sharp
Thanks 🙏
Best kit Lens today or 28-105 AfD is the old best choice
Thanks for your input.