@@pjmathison9787 That's not true at all. When he made the argument that the English flag is a racist symbol, he was schooled by a teenager. Rather than admit he was mistaken, or hold onto his central premise but seek a new avenue, he instead flipped the argument around by bringing up the crusades, but his argument on the crusades was factually incorrect and rather laughable. Similarly, he has made the argument on at least two occasions that he believed the Nazis were better than the British empire of any time period. It seems pretty obvious to me that he will make any argument and stoop to any level to point score for his race-baiting, deconstructionist ideologie.
Ataman the English flag has been used as a racist symbol. Ask any black person who was around in the 70s the national front used to have it plastered all over their pubs to show we weren’t welcomed. Look at the English defence league. That type of nationalism has always been used to portray an in group which was the white English. And I say white English because they would do the same to white Irish. Now a lot of people use who I don’t believe are racist and that’s very true but I believe it’s been coopted by racists and facists. When he talks about about the British empire he’s not talking about the working class people who had and still have no power he’s talking about the ruling class. Who play poor white people and poor black off each other. And there is an argument to made that the British empire is worse than the nazis. The British empire was never about Britain look how they treated their poor. To think that those horrible people at the top were on your side is laughable
@@pjmathison9787 That's the same argument he pushed and it's flawed. The English flag had meaning that superseded that of the EDL or football fandom of the 70s so I don't think it is fair to allow such movements to simply co-opt it without pushback. That is not his argument at all, he at no point highlights class struggle outside of the lens of racial struggle. In fact, he does the opposite by conflating modern British sensibilities with that of the empire. I can safely say that I see no argument in which you can claim the Empire was as bad as the Nazis, not within the time period they were set, nor before if taken in the context of the time. When did I make the claim that anyone was on my side? All I'll say on that subject is that Bob Crachit saw the greatest increase in living conditions for low earners in his lifetime.
All this clown seems to do is spend his life calling everyone a racist. If he doesnt like this country and its people why doesnt he go and live in Africa or Jamaica .
Always speaks the truth and not fearful of the hate he gets for it. Not seen a single person put a good argument across for how he is wrong. They just scream "he is racist" without any evidence
Well, what do you mean "without evidence"? Some of his spurious claims of "Whiteness" and the way he generalises a whole race of people is, by today's standards, the very definition of racism. He exists purely to drive a wedge in society because this is what his whole career is predicated on.
@@MrBannystar Whiteness can affect both white and black people. It isn't specific to white people. Whiteness is just the system that was created by white people in which those with white skin are superior. This still goes on today and finds white people benefiting off it. This means white people are less likely to change it because they don't experience the harmful impact of it. He doesn't exist to "drive a wedge". He speaks to black people in order to allow them to think more radically. He wants to end the racial capitalist system but this doesn't mean he hates white people. Again where is the racism (even though you can't actually be racist to white people)? What generalisations has he made? You couldn't find one racist generalisation and I'd bet my life on it.
@@KD-195 *"Again where is the racism (even though you can't actually be racist to white people)." * Assuming that wasn't a joke, is irony utterly fucking lost on you? I really have no idea if that was serious or not.....
@@MrBannystar Lol i can see why you'd be confused. You technically can't be racist to white people because they benefit off a white supremacist system that sees white people as superior. Basically white people don't suffer institutional oppression due to their race which is the sociological definition of racism. You say that Kehinde is "racist" but what you actually mean is you think he is "racially prejudiced". I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went with the non technical definition of "racism" although its technically not factually correct. Either way I'm yet to see these "generalisations"?
@@KD-195 *"You technically can't be racist to white people because they benefit off a white supremacist system that sees white people as superior."* Then followed by: *"Either way I'm yet to see these "generalisations"?"* I'll say it again: is irony utterly lost on you? Do you ever read what you write? Currently, I live as a minority in another country (originally I'm British). How, exactly, am I currently benefiting from a "white supremacist system"? People like you really are messed in the head. It's genuinely sad how people like you are driving a wedge in society, you're not building bridges with this crap, you're pushing people further apart.
I don’t like the part in which you dismiss and lump Pan-Africanism as bourgeois ideology. Like many ideologies or political movements including Garveyism, Socialism, etc there are reformists and revolutionaries. This is the distinction that we need to make - revolutionary pan-Africanists like Nkrumah, Sekou Toure, Frantz Fanon, Cheikh Anta Diop, Amilcar Cabral etc vs reformist pan-Africanists like Senghor of Senegal and Jomo Kenyatta. You have done a great injustice to radical revolutionary pan-Africanist.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Hates The UK, But refuses to leave ?
bigearedmouse17 hates the system not the people also he was born there. Such a stupid point. He’s trying to change things like anyone in politics
@@pjmathison9787 That's not true at all. When he made the argument that the English flag is a racist symbol, he was schooled by a teenager. Rather than admit he was mistaken, or hold onto his central premise but seek a new avenue, he instead flipped the argument around by bringing up the crusades, but his argument on the crusades was factually incorrect and rather laughable. Similarly, he has made the argument on at least two occasions that he believed the Nazis were better than the British empire of any time period. It seems pretty obvious to me that he will make any argument and stoop to any level to point score for his race-baiting, deconstructionist ideologie.
Ataman the English flag has been used as a racist symbol. Ask any black person who was around in the 70s the national front used to have it plastered all over their pubs to show we weren’t welcomed. Look at the English defence league. That type of nationalism has always been used to portray an in group which was the white English. And I say white English because they would do the same to white Irish. Now a lot of people use who I don’t believe are racist and that’s very true but I believe it’s been coopted by racists and facists. When he talks about about the British empire he’s not talking about the working class people who had and still have no power he’s talking about the ruling class. Who play poor white people and poor black off each other. And there is an argument to made that the British empire is worse than the nazis. The British empire was never about Britain look how they treated their poor. To think that those horrible people at the top were on your side is laughable
@@pjmathison9787 That's the same argument he pushed and it's flawed. The English flag had meaning that superseded that of the EDL or football fandom of the 70s so I don't think it is fair to allow such movements to simply co-opt it without pushback.
That is not his argument at all, he at no point highlights class struggle outside of the lens of racial struggle. In fact, he does the opposite by conflating modern British sensibilities with that of the empire. I can safely say that I see no argument in which you can claim the Empire was as bad as the Nazis, not within the time period they were set, nor before if taken in the context of the time.
When did I make the claim that anyone was on my side? All I'll say on that subject is that Bob Crachit saw the greatest increase in living conditions for low earners in his lifetime.
@@pjmathison9787 The only people offended by a Nations flag are its Enemies ?
Radical, now when has any idealism that identifies as radical ever been a constructive thing.....
Pure racism ... substitute "white' for 'black"... what would this equate to ?
Where was this revolutionary movement 50 years ago, outside or inside the iron curtain?
It was fighting against british and western imperialism
I never expected to hear so many logical fallacies from PHD graduate.
go on then, what are they?
I'd like this guy to interview Umar Johnson
All this clown seems to do is spend his life calling everyone a racist. If he doesnt like this country and its people why doesnt he go and live in Africa or Jamaica .
That is a typical racist statement.
Always speaks the truth and not fearful of the hate he gets for it. Not seen a single person put a good argument across for how he is wrong. They just scream "he is racist" without any evidence
Well, what do you mean "without evidence"? Some of his spurious claims of "Whiteness" and the way he generalises a whole race of people is, by today's standards, the very definition of racism. He exists purely to drive a wedge in society because this is what his whole career is predicated on.
@@MrBannystar Whiteness can affect both white and black people. It isn't specific to white people. Whiteness is just the system that was created by white people in which those with white skin are superior. This still goes on today and finds white people benefiting off it. This means white people are less likely to change it because they don't experience the harmful impact of it. He doesn't exist to "drive a wedge". He speaks to black people in order to allow them to think more radically. He wants to end the racial capitalist system but this doesn't mean he hates white people. Again where is the racism (even though you can't actually be racist to white people)? What generalisations has he made? You couldn't find one racist generalisation and I'd bet my life on it.
@@KD-195 *"Again where is the racism (even though you can't actually be racist to white people)."
*
Assuming that wasn't a joke, is irony utterly fucking lost on you?
I really have no idea if that was serious or not.....
@@MrBannystar Lol i can see why you'd be confused. You technically can't be racist to white people because they benefit off a white supremacist system that sees white people as superior. Basically white people don't suffer institutional oppression due to their race which is the sociological definition of racism. You say that Kehinde is "racist" but what you actually mean is you think he is "racially prejudiced". I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went with the non technical definition of "racism" although its technically not factually correct. Either way I'm yet to see these "generalisations"?
@@KD-195 *"You technically can't be racist to white people because they benefit off a white supremacist system that sees white people as superior."*
Then followed by:
*"Either way I'm yet to see these "generalisations"?"*
I'll say it again: is irony utterly lost on you? Do you ever read what you write?
Currently, I live as a minority in another country (originally I'm British). How, exactly, am I currently benefiting from a "white supremacist system"?
People like you really are messed in the head. It's genuinely sad how people like you are driving a wedge in society, you're not building bridges with this crap, you're pushing people further apart.
Good interview
I don’t like the part in which you dismiss and lump Pan-Africanism as bourgeois ideology. Like many ideologies or political movements including Garveyism, Socialism, etc there are reformists and revolutionaries. This is the distinction that we need to make - revolutionary pan-Africanists like Nkrumah, Sekou Toure, Frantz Fanon, Cheikh Anta Diop, Amilcar Cabral etc vs reformist pan-Africanists like Senghor of Senegal and Jomo Kenyatta. You have done a great injustice to radical revolutionary pan-Africanist.
Agreed
fr, talking about pan africanism without mentioning Nkrumah like whattttt
Kehinde is one of Britain's greatest minds
Next to Keith Lemon
This man has a massive chip on his shoulder, he is a huge racist.
NOI killed Malcolm X. That's enough for me to not give a toss. One of the things we need to look at is his sexism is inhibiting black liberation.
The noi didnt kill malcolm x black fbi unfiltrators in the noi killed him