Britain did not win the war , it's the Soviets who won. Britain just took a lot of punches like a punching bag from Hitler , and Hitler lost interest in that tiny island , and that just saved Britain.
Really that's why Hitler didn't have any boots in Britain but had boots in Soviet but that was Hitlers mistake my dad would of called you a liar Britain was fighting on so many fronts
To say that Britain was insignificant is quite a bad statement. You do have to realise that as most of the continent was pretty much under Axis occupation, you had this bastion of Allied resistance separated only by a small stretch of sea, yet it was an Allied fortress. The Soviets were definitely fighting the Germans very seriously and in great numbers, though on a different front. Britain did contribute a lot to the war, even if not as much as the USSR. But it is important to note that post-WW2, Britain was slowly losing its position as a global superpower, and was succeeded by the USA and USSR. You could even say that the Germans partially achieved what they wanted Britain to be, as Britain suffered a lot after WW2 dealing with damages, financial collapse and the loss of it’s dominance. But I must say Britain was not a mere punching bag, it was a puncher.
@@braverbird60Freedom movements and independence of the colonies was the dagger for the parasite economy of the British imperium, not the war against Germans.
@@braverbird60 Of course. And there's no D Day without Britain, and the Soviets don't chase the Germans all the way to Berlin, if the U.S. and Britain aren't A) bombing German factories, and B) engaging the Germans in North Africa, Italy and France. No well read adult pays attention to this populist "Soviets won the War" nonsense, sadly it's very popular with teenagers who crave "history's secrets they won't tell you in school!" schlock.
We held out against the Axis powers before America came along, we fought as a commonwealth in Africa and Burma and in the skies. If we had been beaten by the Axis in the beginning America would have not entered the war to save us. The Commonwealth/Empire was on its own and we stood strong.
Almost every person these days gets offended 24-7 by something that is completely insignificant or just ridiculous, why should we even take that into account anymore.
I'm not sure that the death of 100+ million people between 1881-1920 in India is trivial or insignificant. Conveniently scrubbed out of textbooks as well.
Why is it so impossible to the thought that churchill put his country first, war is unsafe and deficult decisions are made.. if you dont agree with the pateioted opinion. Why cant you just leave it alone and have a day off. Always a issue and always the country they live in safely.
Stop talking shit. Britain didn't win the war. The Americans and the Soviets did. All Britain did was defend and then jump in when the Soviets were doing germany and you was with the americans and Canadians. The British got whooped in France when having superior numbers.
So piers morgan loves to ignore anything negative churchill did and down play it but when it comes to andrew tate who has literally not killed anybody like churchill and all he can say about andrew is criticisms about him being a misogynist. Double standards.
@@nawoxare5194 I just don’t think historical things should totally be placed in a modern viewpoint, but it’s fine to retain heritage and let it be in the modern world too
everyone was racist back then. it was not as looked down at back then. times have changed we should not try to cancel history just because you dont agree with it now
Michael Jackson was a kiddy fiddler but people are still allowed to enjoy his music... every single nation that exists today is literally based off of racism grow a pair and be grateful that you didnt write your comment in German.
I am a Pakistani-Canadian. and I believe Churchill was a hero for Great Britain. He was the ideal leader for the nation at his time. War was looming upon Europe and his strategic leadership and intelligence helped defeat the Nazis. Albert Einstein also had opinions of the ethnic races that would be considered 'racist' today, but regardless of your 'feelings' there is no doubt, that Einstein too, was a great mind in science and physics. The English have created a civilisation that is an inspiration to the world and they set standards for the third world and developing nations to follow, whether you admit it or not, the scientific and political leaders of western nations helped achieve the advanced civilisations we see today, therefore they should be deemed heroes. All the other countries on earth are either communist, caste-based, tribalistic or politically/intellectually/morally corrupt in comparison to the western civilisation (created by the Brits). This is why the western civilisation is the preferred choice for immigration by ethnic minorities. Despite the wars and colonialism, the western nations are have proved to be superior to other countries because they value knowledge, nature and justice. They do a better job in treating their citizens with humanity and living peacefully and their justice system is more transparent. Other nations do not have the same level of transparency or humility and tend to have wide gaps between the rich and poor due to their casteism, class-isms and egotistic tribal cultures.
Winston Churchill is a hero but unfortunately a racist too. I do respect the man even though he probably wouldn’t respect me. He should be celebrated for his contributions in WWII and criticized for his racist beliefs too
I’m from Trinidad, I live in America now and I can tell you that every one of those Caribbean countries owes gratitude to Britain because all the infrastructure and government is a complete copy of the British government. Reparations for what have you ever been to Haiti.
@@vuzzler1 Lmao! You have no power to give reparations! You’re just an immigrant now!Shows how much you know about the States. You’re not American born and they won’t ever let you forget it so keep licking boots! You think aligning with their ideals will save you?
@ryankay1971 !00% agree with you mate .I have never seen anyone like him who hates England so much as he does.He should p1ss off back to his own sh1thole of a country .
@@RandomKun As a leader hard decisions have to be made. Defeating fascism was crucial in preventing the deaths of millions more people. I don't think Churchill can be held solely responsible. Were more local leaders and wealthy landowners of the area not able to perform charity and help feed or facilitate getting food. Everyone always wants a colonial bogeyman. Africa, Indian subcontinent... you name it. It's someone else's fault. Maybe that's why you lag behind Europe in every conceivable way.
Did Churchill have flaws? Yes and many of them I will 100% accept that but its not fair AT ALL to judge a historical figure by the standards of today, plus without him Churchill we'd all be speaking German and Kehinde would almost certainly NOT be alive to criticise Churchill.
Lol But Piers isn't Racist... He's ONLY asking his guest to leave the country because he doesn't agree with his views 🤷🏾♀️😅😅😅 .... Piers foot is just permanently in his own mouth!!!
Professor Kehinde Andrews, you said everywhere Black people live, the Brits ruined it. May I say that India (the 5th largest economy in the world above the UK) has a growing Black population, you're always welcome to move here! 🇮🇳 🤝🇯🇲.
A scholarly study found that British colonialism resulted in approximately 165 million deaths in India from 1880 to 1920 while stealing at least $45 trillion in wealth from the country. Tens of millions more Indians died in human-made famines that were caused by the British Empire. The impact of British colonial policies during this period was devastating, with excess deaths far surpassing those caused by famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, and North Korea combined. This tragic chapter in history underscores the immense human cost of empire-building and exploitation.
If I was on that morning show I would’ve 😂 my ass off due to the fact that yet again they want money off us.. well we’re all skint so yis are nackad either way 😂
Issue with the reparations arguement is that it wouldn't help anyone, and if anything would make the entire world worse. How much money should be given to be "fair" to both sides? The side asking for reparations would just keep pushing for more and more to bleed countries like Britain dry. They also would most likely become dependent on Britain to prop up their country with funding. A good portion of the "reparations" would most likely be syphoned off into politians' bank accounts and not be used to actually help. Being dependent on countries like Britain to fund a country would be little different to the dependence they had while they were a colony which I would think is a step backwards from bringing the world to be better.
To you because you are of South Asian origins but to me he's in fact the complete opposite. If it was not for him I would not be alive because in fact all my family would've died in a concentration camp.
"Indian & Carribbean food", really? Couldn't actually name a genuine British food he likes! roast dinner, bangers & mash, fish & chips or anything. He might aswell live elsewhere if he all loves about this country is having a debate. Guy literally thinks all of Africa was affected by Britain and not also France, Belgium and other European powers. Delusional!
If colonization ruined Africa then how did it also not ruin America and the economic growth we have had for centuries? What ruined Africa were and still is the corruption that is widespread throughout Africa in the government leadership.
Offcourse why always men with this kind of body language,tone and horrible lives have these kind of views. Why in general strong charismatic powerful dominant men do not have views like that?
@@laurancegama2138 I don't understand how either of the things you said in this comment refute the idea that Winston Churchill was a great man? Yes, a lot of Indians and Africans fought in WWII. However 1) the claim that the overwhelming majority of the allied army consisted of Indian and African soldiers is abjectly false, and 2) Churchill LEAD the war effort. He may not have been on the battlefield, but he was responsible for the tactics and strategy which won us the war. Furthermore, I don't understand what our royal family being of German origin has to do with any of this? The House of Hanover rose to power in Britain in 1714, over two hundred years before WWII.
The Bengal famine was caused by the Japanese and rich Muslim and Hindu leaders who were hoarding food. Nothing to do with Churchill.Very tragic and avoidable famine but there was plenty of food in that region.
Churchill wasn't in India. The Japanese starved the Vietnamese to death a few years later using the same tactic. Anglophobia is not history.@@aarongeorge2702
3 against 1. The facts are that the 1 won the argument here, quite comprehensively. Morgan twisted this around to make out that his opponent hated Britain, straying so far from what the debate was originally about. This was to deflect from the fact that he was losing the debate and to try and let the populous see that he was pro Brit. Saying that Churchill was an extreme racist who cost millions of lives needlessly is factually correct. He also didn't win any war for Britain. He chomped on cigars and drinks brandy throughout all this. Hero? Not a hope. If the British people had rallied around him to the extent that Morgan projects, then he wouldn't have lost the subsequent general election
His loss of the election is nothing to do with his ability to rally the British population to continue they fight against the nazis and also he become prime minister again in 1951 and after that some people wanted back during the 60s but by then he was far too old
@@Bigsonnyblue134 The Fu**in Yanks won the war. Churchill downed brandy and smoked cigars throughout the war. He made a few decent speeches, but they meant nothing to the hundreds of thousands of brave young men being used as fodder for the Germans. What he did during the war needs to be put into perspective. I accept that he is the face of the British defiance, but that's what he was, the reality was very different
Without the indians and the Africans which Britian colonized they won't be a Britian today. Go to the memorial and most of those names on the tombstones were foreigners
It always boils down to money. "Reperations!" I'm all in favour of it, the economy is in the toilet anyway. Give every whinging black person some money and an apology. In 6 months time when they've spent it all they will have to find something else to complain about
If you apply those principles to Jimmy saville u could say well he did loads for charity so let's gloss over the fact his was a ln abuser and call him a a hero. U can't pick and choose where u apply a principle otherwise it becomes prejudice. So yes Churchill was a hero but he was equally a racist, sexist, white supremacist and played a big role in killing 3million Indians that is factual and documented. So if you can gloss over his atrocities with his heroics surely by that you should weigh people's good deeds against their bad to gauge whether they are heroes or villains?
How can this (clearly very educated) gentleman; "Professor Kehinde Andrews" be so extremely ignorant? I rarely see someone ventilating such simplistic, short sighted, Dumb and sensationally frustrated non-sense. He is a smart dude, so I hope he comes back to our universe asap!
Jwvhvt, il n'est pas beau le monde! Un inculte qui traite un professeur pertinent d'ignorant. G.Courteline dit: " Passer pour un imbécile aux yeux d'un idiot est une..."
Sometimes I wonder what country I live in
Never seen anyone before calling someone racist with a grin on their face
It must be exhausting being a victim every day of his life…
It is exhausting. But we will rest when God judges you devils
But it's just the opposite, and that's the problem. His self-worth hinges on the denigration of others.
@@samehear-360 too bad there is no god then
he doesn't seem to mind though!
Whats happen when you learn history book by only images?
You just turn into Piers Morgan
And your point is?!
@@natacus1234 I don't think he has a point, one of those victims who hate anything they deem oppressive.
Britain did not win the war , it's the Soviets who won.
Britain just took a lot of punches like a punching bag from Hitler , and Hitler lost interest in that tiny island , and that just saved Britain.
Really that's why Hitler didn't have any boots in Britain but had boots in Soviet but that was Hitlers mistake my dad would of called you a liar Britain was fighting on so many fronts
To say that Britain was insignificant is quite a bad statement. You do have to realise that as most of the continent was pretty much under Axis occupation, you had this bastion of Allied resistance separated only by a small stretch of sea, yet it was an Allied fortress. The Soviets were definitely fighting the Germans very seriously and in great numbers, though on a different front. Britain did contribute a lot to the war, even if not as much as the USSR. But it is important to note that post-WW2, Britain was slowly losing its position as a global superpower, and was succeeded by the USA and USSR. You could even say that the Germans partially achieved what they wanted Britain to be, as Britain suffered a lot after WW2 dealing with damages, financial collapse and the loss of it’s dominance. But I must say Britain was not a mere punching bag, it was a puncher.
@@braverbird60Freedom movements and independence of the colonies was the dagger for the parasite economy of the British imperium, not the war against Germans.
@@braverbird60 Of course. And there's no D Day without Britain, and the Soviets don't chase the Germans all the way to Berlin, if the U.S. and Britain aren't A) bombing German factories, and B) engaging the Germans in North Africa, Italy and France.
No well read adult pays attention to this populist "Soviets won the War" nonsense, sadly it's very popular with teenagers who crave "history's secrets they won't tell you in school!" schlock.
We held out against the Axis powers before America came along, we fought as a commonwealth in Africa and Burma and in the skies. If we had been beaten by the Axis in the beginning America would have not entered the war to save us. The Commonwealth/Empire was on its own and we stood strong.
History is history mate….live with it.
Almost every person these days gets offended 24-7 by something that is completely insignificant or just ridiculous, why should we even take that into account anymore.
I'm not sure that the death of 100+ million people between 1881-1920 in India is trivial or insignificant. Conveniently scrubbed out of textbooks as well.
I agree. This is a "trigger-friendly" snowflake era now.
@@5andup yeah, being held accountable - even for historical figures - is very saddening /s
Piers Morgan embarrassing himself again. He literally doesn't know anything- The facts don't care about your feelings Piers.
Lol. Theyre basically telling him to "get back where he came from"!😂😂😂
Exactly. They can't handle the truth.
Well, he should definitely be deported!!!!
he hates every part of the country he lives. it's the logical suggestion!!!
Would it be wrong?
he openly says he hates the country....
Why is it so impossible to the thought that churchill put his country first, war is unsafe and deficult decisions are made.. if you dont agree with the pateioted opinion. Why cant you just leave it alone and have a day off. Always a issue and always the country they live in safely.
Agreed.Furthermore,in war,civil rights have been & should be impinged.When Churchill became a PM the 1st time the UK was at war.
That young guy would not be sitting here today spewing nonsense
Stop talking shit. Britain didn't win the war. The Americans and the Soviets did. All Britain did was defend and then jump in when the Soviets were doing germany and you was with the americans and Canadians. The British got whooped in France when having superior numbers.
vey true all white race
@@colinlock-lv9vvthe white s lost the race
So piers morgan loves to ignore anything negative churchill did and down play it but when it comes to andrew tate who has literally not killed anybody like churchill and all he can say about andrew is criticisms about him being a misogynist. Double standards.
He won't go anywhere else because he knows nowhere else can he capitalise on victimisation
Stop comparing Winston to modern standards, back then, the average person would’ve found racist remarks quite the entertainment
British: we have the greatest values inherited from our ancestors.
Also British: Oh don't compare them to modern standard.
@@nawoxare5194 I just don’t think historical things should totally be placed in a modern viewpoint, but it’s fine to retain heritage and let it be in the modern world too
the greatest leader in history.
Yea bro 4 million killed nazi too too too bad and 3.8 million kill Churchill is too too good.
Great era we arguing even killers are great.
Jamaica's economic and social issues were all self inflicted from the late 1960s onwards.
Can you not send him back to his land of origin, secondly what is he doing in the UK ???????????
He is just trying to do what you were done on our land for 350 years.
@@kunal794 Because could, a 1000 years ago we built ships !!!!!!!
@@michaelhardman7022 you build ship then you are permitted to going any were and kill anyone in millions
He has no jungle left to live in
@@kunal794 The rule of law eat or be eaten.
Come on, 3v1 isn’t fair, but Prof Andrews stayed dignified and was historically accurate and factual.
Marxist who hates democracy.
everyone was racist back then. it was not as looked down at back then. times have changed we should not try to cancel history just because you dont agree with it now
Not everyone. Just the British 😂
@vineshnaidoo9402 a great part of people and cultures east of the Ural would disagree with that.
Your not to bright
Another episode of Piers Morgan getting offended by intelligence and critical thought.
He can leave the UK if he wants to.
@@jeciel85 When are you leaving the planet please?
They are proving his point.
Churchill was racist though...are we saying he wasn't?
Michael Jackson was a kiddy fiddler but people are still allowed to enjoy his music...
every single nation that exists today is literally based off of racism grow a pair and be grateful that you didnt write your comment in German.
Who cares
I am a Pakistani-Canadian. and I believe Churchill was a hero for Great Britain. He was the ideal leader for the nation at his time. War was looming upon Europe and his strategic leadership and intelligence helped defeat the Nazis. Albert Einstein also had opinions of the ethnic races that would be considered 'racist' today, but regardless of your 'feelings' there is no doubt, that Einstein too, was a great mind in science and physics. The English have created a civilisation that is an inspiration to the world and they set standards for the third world and developing nations to follow, whether you admit it or not, the scientific and political leaders of western nations helped achieve the advanced civilisations we see today, therefore they should be deemed heroes. All the other countries on earth are either communist, caste-based, tribalistic or politically/intellectually/morally corrupt in comparison to the western civilisation (created by the Brits). This is why the western civilisation is the preferred choice for immigration by ethnic minorities. Despite the wars and colonialism, the western nations are have proved to be superior to other countries because they value knowledge, nature and justice. They do a better job in treating their citizens with humanity and living peacefully and their justice system is more transparent. Other nations do not have the same level of transparency or humility and tend to have wide gaps between the rich and poor due to their casteism, class-isms and egotistic tribal cultures.
Great job you forgot about atrocities done by british specially churchil when bharat was one country with no division isn't it ....shame on you
Winston Churchill is a hero but unfortunately a racist too. I do respect the man even though he probably wouldn’t respect me. He should be celebrated for his contributions in WWII and criticized for his racist beliefs too
Unfortunately nobody takes such a view about "heroes". It's all black or white.
Sensible comment. I agree with you.
So should Mandela.
Nelson Mandela ? The Rand started at $1.40 US Dollars in 1961and its now worth 5 cents US
A sell out and then went to Australia another British wreckage and the oppressed ingenious people asked for help and he ignored.
This black dude is probably drunk. All the good points are lost in his cynicism and lack of seriousness
He needs to live in the jungle if he hates this gorgeous country.
I’m from Trinidad, I live in America now and I can tell you that every one of those Caribbean countries owes gratitude to Britain because all the infrastructure and government is a complete copy of the British government. Reparations for what have you ever been to Haiti.
What an ignorant statement. So glad my Trini fam never taught me this bs.
@@autumnjade815 I give you some reparations a one way ticket to Africa.
@@vuzzler1 Lmao! You have no power to give reparations! You’re just an immigrant now!Shows how much you know about the States. You’re not American born and they won’t ever let you forget it so keep licking boots!
You think aligning with their ideals will save you?
What an ignorant statement yo, Dominican Republic owes nothing to England.
I hate Piers Morgan. Shout out Kehinde for keeping it real
@ryan Kay yea he instead hates every other nation and race outside of britian.
@ryankay1971 !00% agree with you mate .I have never seen anyone like him who hates England so much as he does.He should p1ss off back to his own sh1thole of a country .
The racism in Britain is out of this world they're talking to that intelligent African man like he's a school boy 😡
I'm currently reading a book about him so far, I think Churchill was cool
hes a war hero..
Did you reach the chapter where he described how his policies resulted in killing of millions of Indians.
Sad.
have you read about his escape from a Boer prison. Brilliant story and the the way it panned out was so Churchill. Such a character.
@@RandomKun As a leader hard decisions have to be made. Defeating fascism was crucial in preventing the deaths of millions more people. I don't think Churchill can be held solely responsible. Were more local leaders and wealthy landowners of the area not able to perform charity and help feed or facilitate getting food. Everyone always wants a colonial bogeyman. Africa, Indian subcontinent... you name it. It's someone else's fault. Maybe that's why you lag behind Europe in every conceivable way.
Did Churchill have flaws? Yes and many of them I will 100% accept that but its not fair AT ALL to judge a historical figure by the standards of today, plus without him Churchill we'd all be speaking German and Kehinde would almost certainly NOT be alive to criticise Churchill.
The black guy is not wrong
Morgan has only one response to this: He _singlehandedly_ won the war. What a load of shit
I thought the US supplied arms to both the UK and Russia.
Lol But Piers isn't Racist... He's ONLY asking his guest to leave the country because he doesn't agree with his views 🤷🏾♀️😅😅😅 .... Piers foot is just permanently in his own mouth!!!
He asked to leave the country cause He hates the country
Professor Kehinde Andrews, you said everywhere Black people live, the Brits ruined it. May I say that India (the 5th largest economy in the world above the UK) has a growing Black population, you're always welcome to move here! 🇮🇳 🤝🇯🇲.
Ok Churchill was a cheerleader who contributed to win war and also he stock piled food which lead to starvation of 3 million Indians..
A scholarly study found that British colonialism resulted in approximately 165 million deaths in India from 1880 to 1920 while stealing at least $45 trillion in wealth from the country. Tens of millions more Indians died in human-made famines that were caused by the British Empire. The impact of British colonial policies during this period was devastating, with excess deaths far surpassing those caused by famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, and North Korea combined. This tragic chapter in history underscores the immense human cost of empire-building and exploitation.
So he wants money , surprise, surprise !
If I was on that morning show I would’ve 😂 my ass off due to the fact that yet again they want money off us.. well we’re all skint so yis are nackad either way 😂
Again with the presentism.
Issue with the reparations arguement is that it wouldn't help anyone, and if anything would make the entire world worse. How much money should be given to be "fair" to both sides?
The side asking for reparations would just keep pushing for more and more to bleed countries like Britain dry. They also would most likely become dependent on Britain to prop up their country with funding. A good portion of the "reparations" would most likely be syphoned off into politians' bank accounts and not be used to actually help. Being dependent on countries like Britain to fund a country would be little different to the dependence they had while they were a colony which I would think is a step backwards from bringing the world to be better.
says his parents are caribean and are poor so come here says it all
No vote To prove it
Winston Churchill and Hitler are similar.
To you because you are of South Asian origins but to me he's in fact the complete opposite. If it was not for him I would not be alive because in fact all my family would've died in a concentration camp.
Not really tho
What about quoting Hitler 🤷
Churchill begged the allies to help the people in India
"Indian & Carribbean food", really? Couldn't actually name a genuine British food he likes! roast dinner, bangers & mash, fish & chips or anything. He might aswell live elsewhere if he all loves about this country is having a debate. Guy literally thinks all of Africa was affected by Britain and not also France, Belgium and other European powers. Delusional!
It was mostly England and France, with the Belgians/Dutch coming in a close third. The Spanish focused on the Americas.
bro is right thou .. colonialism ruined africa and basicly everything except asia cuz china did it first ...
If colonization ruined Africa then how did it also not ruin America and the economic growth we have had for centuries? What ruined Africa were and still is the corruption that is widespread throughout Africa in the government leadership.
Extraordinarily offensive
We would not be English and alive right now if it wasn’t for sir winston churchill.
jwish propaganda at its best
Debatable
He hates ENGLAND he should leave
All the comments were somehow erased from this video as well. Lol again I wonder why. We know Piers😂
Offcourse why always men with this kind of body language,tone and horrible lives have these kind of views. Why in general strong charismatic powerful dominant men do not have views like that?
not many times that i agree with Piers but Kehinde Andrews giving an example of a communist hero, his entire argument is lost on that fact.
What ?
This guy spews gibberish.
🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Little weasel
GREAT MAN CHURCHILL.
Bull... Without the indians and Africans the world would be speaking German and japanese so stop this. Ps the British royals are German ain't they ?
@@laurancegama2138 I don't understand how either of the things you said in this comment refute the idea that Winston Churchill was a great man? Yes, a lot of Indians and Africans fought in WWII. However 1) the claim that the overwhelming majority of the allied army consisted of Indian and African soldiers is abjectly false, and 2) Churchill LEAD the war effort. He may not have been on the battlefield, but he was responsible for the tactics and strategy which won us the war. Furthermore, I don't understand what our royal family being of German origin has to do with any of this? The House of Hanover rose to power in Britain in 1714, over two hundred years before WWII.
@@laurancegama2138 Great man Churchill.
@@theb1gfudge Great man Churchill.
4 Churchills attack him 😊 Kehinde Andrews I think there is no point in talking with them; it is just a waste of time.
Bullies !!
Who cares about what the bald guy thinks. He can leave UK if he wants to.
The Bengal famine was caused by the Japanese and rich Muslim and Hindu leaders who were hoarding food. Nothing to do with Churchill.Very tragic and avoidable famine but there was plenty of food in that region.
You have no idea about history 😂
You are at war with unfashionable facts.@@aarongeorge2702
@@jacobfield4848 u need to learn true history not fake history brother.
@@jacobfield4848 Churchill deliberately moved food items away from the bengalis because he hated them so much
Churchill wasn't in India. The Japanese starved the Vietnamese to death a few years later using the same tactic. Anglophobia is not history.@@aarongeorge2702
3 against 1. The facts are that the 1 won the argument here, quite comprehensively. Morgan twisted this around to make out that his opponent hated Britain, straying so far from what the debate was originally about. This was to deflect from the fact that he was losing the debate and to try and let the populous see that he was pro Brit. Saying that Churchill was an extreme racist who cost millions of lives needlessly is factually correct. He also didn't win any war for Britain. He chomped on cigars and drinks brandy throughout all this. Hero? Not a hope. If the British people had rallied around him to the extent that Morgan projects, then he wouldn't have lost the subsequent general election
His loss of the election is nothing to do with his ability to rally the British population to continue they fight against the nazis and also he become prime minister again in 1951 and after that some people wanted back during the 60s but by then he was far too old
@@Bigsonnyblue134 The Fu**in Yanks won the war. Churchill downed brandy and smoked cigars throughout the war. He made a few decent speeches, but they meant nothing to the hundreds of thousands of brave young men being used as fodder for the Germans. What he did during the war needs to be put into perspective. I accept that he is the face of the British defiance, but that's what he was, the reality was very different
Without the indians and the Africans which Britian colonized they won't be a Britian today. Go to the memorial and most of those names on the tombstones were foreigners
It always boils down to money. "Reperations!"
I'm all in favour of it, the economy is in the toilet anyway. Give every whinging black person some money and an apology. In 6 months time when they've spent it all they will have to find something else to complain about
😂
Yes 🙌🏾
Yes 🙌🏾
Yep 🎉
😂 black man wins the first to take down piers
@ryankay1971 YEAH he did
Bruh
Churchill was literally Jewish?
If you apply those principles to Jimmy saville u could say well he did loads for charity so let's gloss over the fact his was a ln abuser and call him a a hero. U can't pick and choose where u apply a principle otherwise it becomes prejudice. So yes Churchill was a hero but he was equally a racist, sexist, white supremacist and played a big role in killing 3million Indians that is factual and documented. So if you can gloss over his atrocities with his heroics surely by that you should weigh people's good deeds against their bad to gauge whether they are heroes or villains?
How can this (clearly very educated) gentleman; "Professor Kehinde Andrews" be so extremely ignorant? I rarely see someone ventilating such simplistic, short sighted, Dumb and sensationally frustrated non-sense. He is a smart dude, so I hope he comes back to our universe asap!
Jwvhvt, il n'est pas beau le monde! Un inculte qui traite un professeur pertinent d'ignorant.
G.Courteline dit:
" Passer pour un imbécile aux yeux d'un idiot est une..."
Wish we had Churchill here now a good politician real man. Not the idiots in charge now. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧