private businesses are under no obligation to provide its customers/users with unbridled free speech, it doesn't even work that way in the normal real world... sure one can say anything they want, but that does not mean its free of consequence. free speech absolutists are delusional, in the face of reality.
Exactly. Free speech is a relative as a moral. The issue is, it must remain at all costs. Even the cons. The most important way for society to figure out an issue is open communication.
The silly woman says anyone who disagrees with her is a 'Troll' and needs 'Controlled'. The silly man said A.I. must control people and restrict free speech. No election is 'highjacked' unless the MADE IN CHINA vote machines are controlled over the internet.
I think that female 'journalist' forgets Twitter is a private company not a government service, even if the Government chooses to use it that way. How about holding the Govt accountable for using Twitter to disseminate information and not a Govt only platform made for that purpose?
Absolutely! Note the excitement and protest from the groups, ideologies and political parties who can no longer manipulate the former undesirable or challenging narrative, typically having them blocked or shut down. From what I understand that was precisely why Musk invested in it, so it could be a neutral platform for debate/discussion vs the propaganda machine it had devolved into.
This is exactly the entire point of free speech. Each person can have their own relative truths and largely be free to express it. This at least allows a fair consensus to be come to rather than a curated narrow set of beliefs as it had been on Twitter.
@@MrLathor Sorry but we have to base society on science and facts. Or we will go back to the dark ages.. Science and the scientific method is how we got this far. When people just throw science out the window and go with conspiracy theories. We should not allow them to use a platform society has built to empower themselfs on angry/deperate people.
@@MrDanisve I never said we shouldn’t rely on science. Just that a narrow point of view shouldn’t be catered to. It’s not like the far left views being enabled on Twitter are based on science, they are often based on strong negative emotion actually. Thats one reason Twitter is such a cesspool, everybody is always angry.
Don't trust him - he bought a massive lot of Bitcoin and then afterwards praised it highly wanted to accept it as payment for his cars over a year ago, and only then its value rose - then a few weeks later had sold the lot without warning (sounds like a profit) and declined it as payment - the subsequent fall in Bitcoin value caused millions to lose a lot of money !
Market manipulation through lies is and has been Elon's modus operandi for years. As owner (through moderation) he can tweak which narratives are toned up or down. Without proper legislation and transparency this means he basically has the power to manipulate all stocks and all elections in every single country on earth. He is the least trustworthy person to put in this sort of position.
yes he does seem to have benefitted from the global Bitcoin pump and dump..... obviously it wouldn't be anything to do with his pronouncements on the subject or Tesla's widely publishing but temporary acceptance of bitcoin to pay for cars..... he's got far too much integrity for that.
Jack Dorsey went to congress answering lots of grueling questions. At the current moment, it seems all those hateful, conspiracy twitters are from the right, some far right.
@@freedomlife3623 Jack Dorsey lied with every answer and the dems actively colluded with him to violate Americans First Amendment Rights. As for where the hate is currently coming from look at Kathi Griffith, she is well known for spreading hate and just got suspended for changing her account name to Elon Musk and then impersonating him to spread missinformation. After being banned she used her dead mothers account to actively spread missinformation again. Name a right wing account that has done anything even close to that evil since Musk bought Twitter. Thanks in advance for proving me correct.
Every time I hear Elon Musk 's name I feel nauseated! Shame on him for naming his car company after the famed genius 'Nikola Tesla' who wanted free electricity 🔌 for all. Tesla was a moral and righteous man. Musk is the total opposite!
Why is to so hard for people to see that interconnection to the internet itself is the 'public square' for free speech, not the individual privately owned platforms, sites and apps on to it? Nobody is or was preventing anyone from completing the apparently monumental task of clicking/tapping on the address bar and going somewhere different, or putting up your own site and putting literally anything you wanted whatsoever on it. This is a societal problem cause by people _choosing_ to live in bubbles, not Elon Musk or Jack Dorsey's.
someone explain to me why because you're the CEO of twitter you can't give opinion on election. I've gone to do the work by reading his tweet on this midterm just 3-days ago the one which he shared what was his own belief on who he's voting..Yes, he said his recommendation is voting for Republican Congress to share power. Again, should that be wrong what's the justification, unless you have proof he's personally on the moderation team. Again, people all over these kinda forums have this fear that he's running interference without proof, kinda like the incidents over every election every year since twitter became a news platform ppl deemed the most influential of resources, that's since when I've no idea, but it started whenever everyone began showing fear over who's in-control of twitter moderation no?
It causes criticism, like if someone buys a newspaper and then as the owner of that newspaper starts spouting off a load of right wing claptrap...... your underlings are going to self-censor and the culture of the organisation will change itself to reflect your libertarian pronouncements. And users of that media / buyers of that newsaper will have an opinion. That's why.
I thought the same thing exactly, he would have made that message whether he was the 'Chief Twit' or not. The gender fluid 'woke' Karen would have grounds for complaint had he set up a proliferation of pro-Republican messages on every subscribers message board, but he did not. She/They ought to Foxtrot Oscar!
The woman is basically anti-freedom & pro-enslavement. FREEDOM is radical & this is why Free Will for living objects is such a Liberating experience. $8 month for membership is fine. Everyone else can read for free... but if you want a verified business account , $8 is cheap web hosting. A.I. enslavement of humans free speech is a horrible idea.
I agree with making these people coming to the office. If other people that can’t work from home do well and are not getting sick, they need to come to work. No more work from home.
Its a waste if resources to continue working in a office that you heat and cool. It cost money to operate. Shove the operator cost on the employee. No toilet paper cost, building maintenance.
@@Joe44944 thats why they can use hybrid locations. Smaller buildings, closer to home, for the few people who need to separate work space from home space. The solutions are available.
Why you don't trust Elon to moderate the world? Haven't you seen his twitter, he's very level headed guy clearly. He's like future lord mars apparently...
And yet, free speech broski, Musk, has just fired a SoaceX engineer who publicly criticised him. The fact seems to be that you can have free speech, provided it’s free speech with which Musk agrees.
You miss by a mile the nuance of "free speech". BTW, firing him did nothing to limit his freedom to say whatever he wants. For most any company to be successful, there has to be a sense of 'TEAM'. In Space X, it is essential: lives are at stake as well as investments (i.e. the viability of the company). Bottom line, it wasn't Musk's 'feelings' which were potentially harmed.
Free speech doesn't include yelling fire in a theatre, so we know there are limits, and they are set by intent. A person could be found liable for speech with a malicious intent. In an ideal world perhaps having the loudest megaphone shouldn't make a difference but it does. The person with the loudest megaphone either must practice meticulous discernment in who that person allows to use it or none. I hope that a population well educated in civics and the humanities can separate the BS from what has value. America teaches to pass tests and get a job, not have a well rounded educations.
The problem is that America has chosen to politically educate itself by listening to the loudest demagogue and then tuning in ONLY to media that re-enforce the listener's chosen prejudices. That is how you get to the absurd situation where people celebrate committing treason by invading the capitol and 40% of Republicans think the election was fraudulent DESPITE the absence of a single piece successful lawsuit on the subject (because it simply wasn't). America doesn't need to worry about an ascendant China, the US is in the process of becoming two countries or one country + a real, shooting, civil war.... after which Somalia will look like a pretty well organised country by comparison.
Free Speech in a privately owned theater means you can yell all you want, play the movies you like. Twitter is Private property of a Private owner, if you don't like it, build your own website.
WOW, Kyle Spencer is the best example of an online Karen i've ever seen. In so much as her describing a platform where "at least the truth is being discussed" Jack Dorsey said it best when he responded to Musk a few days ago "Accurate to who?" which is essentially the same thing. Semantics alone make that hugely challenging.
FREE SPEECH = NO REGULATION. If you don't like what someone says, well, don't follow them. Hate, Love, Joy, Sadness, ' dis informations ' is free for all, what does France dislike our free speech ?
The woman with the glasses can just take her opinions and get off Twitter! She wants to prevent people with opposing views. I'd rather see people like her removed. Let adult people draw their own conclusions, we're not small kids who needs to be protected at all times.
I agree entirely, she strikes me as the 'woke' type of Karen who would gladly see a white heterosexual male blocked because he did not want a drag queen reading to his child, or a woman stating she disagreed with trans women sharing the restroom or competing in their sport, along with a English professor who rightfully objects to the grammatical abuse of pronouns for people who claim they are not either gender! Hopefully this might be the beginning of the long overdue return to reality.
she want to silence anyone that disagrees with her. She calls them 'trolls' which in fact is 'hate speech' name calling. What the Leftists hate is free speech, and all Hate Speech is also Free Speech. Otherwise we can not call out the embezzlers & cartel members on their real crimes of theft, murder, and every real crime you can think of...
Republicans dont have much in common with most of Europe. Hard to have a discussion with someone living in year 1900. Even democrats are pretty far right for most of Europe. So the republicans are off the scale right extremists. Im my eyes they are not far from the Nazis.
Whatever the new Twitter rules may be, if Musk simply applies them equally to all users (regardless of political affiliation), it will be a huge improvement over the past, back when the leftists running Twitter were biased 'bigly' in favor of the far left.
No, they were trying to curb bs, conspiracy theories, hate speech, etc. Now you have a new attention seeking whiner loving to be in charge of the next wave of chaos ...
@@abocas That's where you're wrong. You've made up your mind that 'they' (the left/far left) can accurately decide what is and is not bs/conspiracy theories/hate speech etc. There are many on the new left who believe that simply disagreeing with them on, say, transgender issues, constitutes 'hate'. You/they have changed the definition of 'hate' to include things you dislike. That makes no sense. Leave speech alone. A few common sense restrictions e.g. disallowing doxing, calls for violence and illegal material, makes sense. The 'marketplace of ideas' will sort out the rest of it.
"Without Elon Musk there would be no war in Ukraine", that should not have been let to go unchallenged. That is not factual along with some other of that fellow's comments. He was talking about misinformation and cites an Amerikan rightwing trope "Brandon".
I'm surprised anybody would blame Musk for the war lol. As far as I knew Musk was pushing for a settlement for this conflict. He did provide starlink satellite internet for the Ukrainians, but that doesn't make him to blame for the conflict.
If Musk wanted, he could easily switch over the StarLink data to Russia. Instantly, Putin's forces would pinpoint every Ukraine communication location ! In a few hours every Ukraine technology location could be destroyed by Iran's Drones. SO EASY.
Just quit twitter, something will rise up in it's place if it's so irreplaceable. The fact is it isn't all that important and it's just a messaging app with some glitter here and there. Facebook and the rest are the same deal. Interaction metrics (which elon loves to boast) don't equate to platform value or necessity. And those metrics alone have nothing to do with brand safe for advertisers. Humans will interact will all sorts of junk it doesn't make it irreplaceable, there's an argument for the opposite in many cases. I don't think humans as a whole were ready for computers and their rapid role in modern society, this is the larger problem.
Read your Bible for truth. How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, Nor stand in the path of sinners, Nor sit in the seat of scoffers! But his delight is in the law of the Lord, And in His law he meditates day and night. He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, Which yields its fruit in its season And its leaf does not wither; And in whatever he does, he prospers. The wicked are not so, But they are like chaff which the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the wicked will perish. Psalms 1:1-6 NASB
Ofcourse he can. He can speak fine every time all the time. This is what happened and that ain't no lie! Hey I once took a cycle ride with the guy who invented the penny farthing.. ask him he'll tell you! 🤣
So before Elon Musk bought Twitter, and content was moderate in favour of the far-left, then it was OK to have Saudis as shareholders? OH, GIVE ME A BREAK!
Everyone loves free speech; problem is that a number of people's concept of free speech isn't actually all that free.
private businesses are under no obligation to provide its customers/users with unbridled free speech, it doesn't even work that way in the normal real world... sure one can say anything they want, but that does not mean its free of consequence.
free speech absolutists are delusional, in the face of reality.
Exactly. Free speech is a relative as a moral.
The issue is, it must remain at all costs. Even the cons. The most important way for society to figure out an issue is open communication.
The silly woman says anyone who disagrees with her is a 'Troll' and needs 'Controlled'. The silly man said A.I. must control people and restrict free speech. No election is 'highjacked' unless the MADE IN CHINA vote machines are controlled over the internet.
Free speech sounds amazing, but then people get the idea that they know better than the government.
I think that female 'journalist' forgets Twitter is a private company not a government service, even if the Government chooses to use it that way. How about holding the Govt accountable for using Twitter to disseminate information and not a Govt only platform made for that purpose?
Absolutely! Note the excitement and protest from the groups, ideologies and political parties who can no longer manipulate the former undesirable or challenging narrative, typically having them blocked or shut down.
From what I understand that was precisely why Musk invested in it, so it could be a neutral platform for debate/discussion vs the propaganda machine it had devolved into.
If someone is wrong then prove it, don't just shut them down!
Quite right, we will only get anywhere through talking, engaging, discussing, and learning to reason with respect and open mindedness.
@@Pfromm007 do you give the same credence to a screaming lunatic as you do thoughful commentary?
@@Pfromm007 well, you can’t reason with someone intentionally twist your words, someone just so hateful or someone so deep in the alternative reality.
I bet this channel had no problem with censorship when it was Jack Dorsey doing it.
Who defines "Truth"? Absolute truth or relative...Your definition of truth?? Who really needs Twitter, any social media. I dont!!
This is exactly the entire point of free speech. Each person can have their own relative truths and largely be free to express it. This at least allows a fair consensus to be come to rather than a curated narrow set of beliefs as it had been on Twitter.
@@MrLathor Sorry but we have to base society on science and facts. Or we will go back to the dark ages..
Science and the scientific method is how we got this far. When people just throw science out the window and go with conspiracy theories. We should not allow them to use a platform society has built to empower themselfs on angry/deperate people.
@@MrDanisve I never said we shouldn’t rely on science. Just that a narrow point of view shouldn’t be catered to. It’s not like the far left views being enabled on Twitter are based on science, they are often based on strong negative emotion actually. Thats one reason Twitter is such a cesspool, everybody is always angry.
i cheer this financial loss, it was a bad bet driven by a billionaires ego...
its not a loss... it is a platform for truth now... i hope elon buys truth social as well
Defending Saudi prince, XI and Putin regime, supporting Trump, Kanye west craziness, made free platform 8, dollars for free speech
paid speech, not free speech... so the users are now just be milked for musks profit, that won't last. abandon twitter..
Private company they can do what they want.
Not completely lol
Don't trust him - he bought a massive lot of Bitcoin and then afterwards praised it highly wanted to accept it as payment for his cars over a year ago, and only then its value rose - then a few weeks later had sold the lot without warning (sounds like a profit) and declined it as payment - the subsequent fall in Bitcoin value caused millions to lose a lot of money !
Market manipulation through lies is and has been Elon's modus operandi for years. As owner (through moderation) he can tweak which narratives are toned up or down. Without proper legislation and transparency this means he basically has the power to manipulate all stocks and all elections in every single country on earth. He is the least trustworthy person to put in this sort of position.
yes he does seem to have benefitted from the global Bitcoin pump and dump..... obviously it wouldn't be anything to do with his pronouncements on the subject or Tesla's widely publishing but temporary acceptance of bitcoin to pay for cars..... he's got far too much integrity for that.
These big hippocrites...when twitter banned conservatives, nobody said anything, now the woke mob are crying🤣
Ponzi Coin has always been a scam. Only the gullable fall for it's deception. Plenty of people lost money on it.
Buy Gold, Steel, & Lead.
Why was this not a concern when Jack Dorsey was ceo? Jack only censored people on the right
Whaaaaah! Good speech stops right wing lies, which was an open faucet when trump attempted presidency.
Because the right post racism, violence, conspiracy and antisemitism 🙄
yeah the qtards tend to believe that lie... so we've uncovered your agenda bot boy.
Jack Dorsey went to congress answering lots of grueling questions. At the current moment, it seems all those hateful, conspiracy twitters are from the right, some far right.
@@freedomlife3623 Jack Dorsey lied with every answer and the dems actively colluded with him to violate Americans First Amendment Rights.
As for where the hate is currently coming from look at Kathi Griffith, she is well known for spreading hate and just got suspended for changing her account name to Elon Musk and then impersonating him to spread missinformation. After being banned she used her dead mothers account to actively spread missinformation again. Name a right wing account that has done anything even close to that evil since Musk bought Twitter. Thanks in advance for proving me correct.
Elon is going to be on the wrong side of history. Aligned with people like Trump and Kanye but now that madhouse is burning down
you mean hes hilterler side？
?????????????????????
you can't be for free speech and moderate said speech. These two things are opposed.
Every time I hear Elon Musk 's name I feel nauseated! Shame on him for naming his car company after the famed genius 'Nikola Tesla' who wanted free electricity 🔌 for all. Tesla was a moral and righteous man. Musk is the total opposite!
Why is to so hard for people to see that interconnection to the internet itself is the 'public square' for free speech, not the individual privately owned platforms, sites and apps on to it? Nobody is or was preventing anyone from completing the apparently monumental task of clicking/tapping on the address bar and going somewhere different, or putting up your own site and putting literally anything you wanted whatsoever on it. This is a societal problem cause by people _choosing_ to live in bubbles, not Elon Musk or Jack Dorsey's.
interesting perspective... it is almost like you are explaining life...🤔🍻🤣
Quite Right! Very well said. Your message ought to be pinned at the top, it is the most relevant and sensible comment yet.
Interesting insight, thank you for sharing.
Money can’t buy you class.
NTD: you brought only radical leftists to the "debate". Too biassed. 👎👎👎
France 24 is the CNN of France what did you expect?
We should thank them for showing us what leftists truly believe: All people must be silenced & enslaved under their system.
Why are you all bent on stopping free expression unless you have guilt to keep it a secret?
someone explain to me why because you're the CEO of twitter you can't give opinion on election.
I've gone to do the work by reading his tweet on this midterm just 3-days ago the one which he shared what was his own belief on who he's voting..Yes, he said his recommendation is voting for Republican Congress to share power. Again, should that be wrong what's the justification, unless you have proof he's personally on the moderation team. Again, people all over these kinda forums have this fear that he's running interference without proof, kinda like the incidents over every election every year since twitter became a news platform ppl deemed the most influential of resources, that's since when I've no idea, but it started whenever everyone began showing fear over who's in-control of twitter moderation no?
It causes criticism, like if someone buys a newspaper and then as the owner of that newspaper starts spouting off a load of right wing claptrap...... your underlings are going to self-censor and the culture of the organisation will change itself to reflect your libertarian pronouncements. And users of that media / buyers of that newsaper will have an opinion.
That's why.
I thought the same thing exactly, he would have made that message whether he was the 'Chief Twit' or not. The gender fluid 'woke' Karen would have grounds for complaint had he set up a proliferation of pro-Republican messages on every subscribers message board, but he did not. She/They ought to Foxtrot Oscar!
The woman is basically anti-freedom & pro-enslavement. FREEDOM is radical & this is why Free Will for living objects is such a Liberating experience. $8 month for membership is fine. Everyone else can read for free... but if you want a verified business account , $8 is cheap web hosting. A.I. enslavement of humans free speech is a horrible idea.
I guess it's like when they say don't get high on your own supply.
I agree with making these people coming to the office. If other people that can’t work from home do well and are not getting sick, they need to come to work. No more work from home.
Why, if the workers can save 2-3 hours of transit time and achieve the same production? It’s good for the planet and mental health.
Its a waste if resources to continue working in a office that you heat and cool. It cost money to operate. Shove the operator cost on the employee. No toilet paper cost, building maintenance.
I can get more work done in the office than at home b/c l can focus more besides the fridge isn't right there with food in it all the time, lol
@@Joe44944 thats why they can use hybrid locations. Smaller buildings, closer to home, for the few people who need to separate work space from home space. The solutions are available.
@@freedomlife3623 There have been studies that show working from home reduces output.
Where were the calls before Elon took over?
part of democracy is questioning those in power... only in authoritarian states are you not allowed to speak up... we have a CONSTITUTION FOR A REASON
The problem is it’s only one side who wants speech censored.
Both sides oppose mentioning the juice for any reason.
Hate social media,, and I am doing just fine with out 💃🏻💃🏻💃🏻
This is social media!
@@kramer9929 technically true but it's more of a entertainment media imo
a digital town square... enough said...
It's not the job of a platform to determine the facts so it only follows that fact checkers are an unnecessary expense.
Fabrice Epelboin should stick to social media and cybeerwarfare and not comment military strategy and wars. This was painful to watch.
I’m not on twitter, however I was considering joining… maybe I will stay away!
Elon's call to vote republican aged well, where's his I-want-to-be-cool-so-bad meme for that?
The GOP control the House. Meaning everything goes through them from now on.
Too bad in this debate Mr. Connor is absolutely clueless about the subject.
'Freespeech for only a sub of $8/m! Unless it offends me then you'll be blocked or banned....'
'Wait, you don't want your Ad next to a pic of Himler?'
go ahead and make your own website. it is easy.
go ahead and make your own website. it is easy.
go ahead and make your own website. it is easy.
He is the greatest enemy of parody on Twitter. Lmao.
Moderator really biased against Musk
Why you don't trust Elon to moderate the world? Haven't you seen his twitter, he's very level headed guy clearly. He's like future lord mars apparently...
And yet, free speech broski, Musk, has just fired a SoaceX engineer who publicly criticised him.
The fact seems to be that you can have free speech, provided it’s free speech with which Musk agrees.
You miss by a mile the nuance of "free speech". BTW, firing him did nothing to limit his freedom to say whatever he wants. For most any company to be successful, there has to be a sense of 'TEAM'. In Space X, it is essential: lives are at stake as well as investments (i.e. the viability of the company). Bottom line, it wasn't Musk's 'feelings' which were potentially harmed.
Liberals got mad 😂
Even SKY NEWS turned off their comments on the "screaming activists" they couldn't handle the backlash. 😂
It goes both way, far right and far left are all extremism.
Free speech doesn't include yelling fire in a theatre, so we know there are limits, and they are set by intent. A person could be found liable for speech with a malicious intent. In an ideal world perhaps having the loudest megaphone shouldn't make a difference but it does. The person with the loudest megaphone either must practice meticulous discernment in who that person allows to use it or none. I hope that a population well educated in civics and the humanities can separate the BS from what has value. America teaches to pass tests and get a job, not have a well rounded educations.
The problem is that America has chosen to politically educate itself by listening to the loudest demagogue and then tuning in ONLY to media that re-enforce the listener's chosen prejudices. That is how you get to the absurd situation where people celebrate committing treason by invading the capitol and 40% of Republicans think the election was fraudulent DESPITE the absence of a single piece successful lawsuit on the subject (because it simply wasn't).
America doesn't need to worry about an ascendant China, the US is in the process of becoming two countries or one country + a real, shooting, civil war.... after which Somalia will look like a pretty well organised country by comparison.
Free Speech in a privately owned theater means you can yell all you want, play the movies you like. Twitter is Private property of a Private owner, if you don't like it, build your own website.
It only limited political opinions
@@SeaJay_Oceans You are wrong, it is just that simple.
You are allowed to yell fire in a theater. What we have here is people justifying caveats to an inalienable right.
Many have freedom of silence which inhibits revelation of purpose
twitter taxes are paid in usd and main servers in america... therfore all twitter traffic is subject to the usa contitution...
WOW, Kyle Spencer is the best example of an online Karen i've ever seen. In so much as her describing a platform where "at least the truth is being discussed" Jack Dorsey said it best when he responded to Musk a few days ago "Accurate to who?" which is essentially the same thing. Semantics alone make that hugely challenging.
Wally that is brilliant! She is absolutely a Karen, a very gender fluid Karen!
"X" doesn't promote "FREE SPEECH"!
Leave Musk alone.
Let’s not forget that Elon Musk delivers all the X data to the Israeli private company Au10tix which sends it further to the Mossad.
He who pays the piper calls the tune......
yeah and people who don't like the tune find another piper... leaving that first piper with a 40 billion dollar sink hole in his networth.
We shall see......
Rupert Murdoch did it first.
Putin absolutely wrong.
Defender of his own legacy
FREE SPEECH = NO REGULATION.
If you don't like what someone says, well, don't follow them.
Hate, Love, Joy, Sadness, ' dis informations ' is free for all, what does France dislike our free speech ?
The woman with the glasses can just take her opinions and get off Twitter! She wants to prevent people with opposing views. I'd rather see people like her removed. Let adult people draw their own conclusions, we're not small kids who needs to be protected at all times.
So you want people with opposing views to your own removed? Who is wearing the glasses here?
I agree entirely, she strikes me as the 'woke' type of Karen who would gladly see a white heterosexual male blocked because he did not want a drag queen reading to his child, or a woman stating she disagreed with trans women sharing the restroom or competing in their sport, along with a English professor who rightfully objects to the grammatical abuse of pronouns for people who claim they are not either gender!
Hopefully this might be the beginning of the long overdue return to reality.
she want to silence anyone that disagrees with her. She calls them 'trolls' which in fact is 'hate speech' name calling.
What the Leftists hate is free speech, and all Hate Speech is also Free Speech. Otherwise we can not call out the embezzlers & cartel members on their real crimes of theft, murder, and every real crime you can think of...
Well, this aged like milk.
That's so funny, tell me another 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'll give you one guess who's holding a lot of tech stocks out of this bunch.
Elon Musk is great!!!
private company............cope and seeth MOAR
French shows like this must invite Republicans to have balanced panel.
France 24 is the CNN of France what did you expect?
Republicans dont have much in common with most of Europe. Hard to have a discussion with someone living in year 1900.
Even democrats are pretty far right for most of Europe. So the republicans are off the scale right extremists. Im my eyes they are not far from the Nazis.
There are no republican sympathizers in Europe and this show is for Europe.
boycott is the best weapon of the public
Excellent exposition of this very relevant and dangerous subject!
where were you before when it was done before Elon Musk....
Freedom & Liberty is only dangerous to Tyrants.
He just figures he should be a the helm ..he is getting ready for the robots .... the worst is yet to come for the human being
Whatever the new Twitter rules may be, if Musk simply applies them equally to all users (regardless of political affiliation), it will be a huge improvement over the past, back when the leftists running Twitter were biased 'bigly' in favor of the far left.
No, they were trying to curb bs, conspiracy theories, hate speech, etc.
Now you have a new attention seeking whiner loving to be in charge of the next wave of chaos ...
@@abocas That's where you're wrong. You've made up your mind that 'they' (the left/far left) can accurately decide what is and is not bs/conspiracy theories/hate speech etc. There are many on the new left who believe that simply disagreeing with them on, say, transgender issues, constitutes 'hate'. You/they have changed the definition of 'hate' to include things you dislike. That makes no sense. Leave speech alone. A few common sense restrictions e.g. disallowing doxing, calls for violence and illegal material, makes sense. The 'marketplace of ideas' will sort out the rest of it.
? Paris mo 🦆(sightseeing Paris France) DeGallo ? Galina ? Ciega ? Crimea 🏝 ? Kuril ? Kuril Kuril 🏝?
too bad， everybody like hisopinoin， no t you r s
Ukrainian will win, because they right.
thunderf00t says it well
as if people did not make rules based on their biases all before.....
Car salesman.
"Without Elon Musk there would be no war in Ukraine", that should not have been let to go unchallenged. That is not factual along with some other of that fellow's comments. He was talking about misinformation and cites an Amerikan rightwing trope "Brandon".
I'm surprised anybody would blame Musk for the war lol. As far as I knew Musk was pushing for a settlement for this conflict. He did provide starlink satellite internet for the Ukrainians, but that doesn't make him to blame for the conflict.
You guys have comprehension problem. He was not blaming the war on Musk.
If Musk wanted, he could easily switch over the StarLink data to Russia. Instantly, Putin's forces would pinpoint every Ukraine communication location ! In a few hours every Ukraine technology location could be destroyed by Iran's Drones. SO EASY.
Musk is the next chaos pilot ....
Ppbbtlenty! 😂 glad that made the cut
Just quit twitter, something will rise up in it's place if it's so irreplaceable. The fact is it isn't all that important and it's just a messaging app with some glitter here and there. Facebook and the rest are the same deal. Interaction metrics (which elon loves to boast) don't equate to platform value or necessity. And those metrics alone have nothing to do with brand safe for advertisers. Humans will interact will all sorts of junk it doesn't make it irreplaceable, there's an argument for the opposite in many cases. I don't think humans as a whole were ready for computers and their rapid role in modern society, this is the larger problem.
Cope and seethe.
Read your Bible for truth.
How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, Nor stand in the path of sinners, Nor sit in the seat of scoffers! But his delight is in the law of the Lord, And in His law he meditates day and night. He will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, Which yields its fruit in its season And its leaf does not wither; And in whatever he does, he prospers. The wicked are not so, But they are like chaff which the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the assembly of the righteous. For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the wicked will perish.
Psalms 1:1-6 NASB
Hahaha, a book written by men in the dark age about some invisible being. Truth? Far from it.
Jesus is Kool, but God can phuck off
LOL who actually uses twitter?
I spend far more time at my work computer from home. Hope that he gets the pants sued off of him. 😊
nope... He said people can still Work From Home - just not work for Twitter any more. :-)
Elon Musk the rwal deal.
Musk is all about "Free Speech" just don't say anything bad against him or his companies!
Insult someone giving you millions $ and don't be shocked when he's offended.
Omg Biden can’t speak one useful cohesive sentence 🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈
Show me how you handle public speaking and answer reporter’s question on the spot first. It’s always easy to criticize.
@@freedomlife3623 he has Alzheimer's
Ofcourse he can. He can speak fine every time all the time. This is what happened and that ain't no lie! Hey I once took a cycle ride with the guy who invented the penny farthing.. ask him he'll tell you! 🤣
Sound?
reload the video the advertisement broke the audio
So before Elon Musk bought Twitter, and content was moderate in favour of the far-left, then it was OK to have Saudis as shareholders? OH, GIVE ME A BREAK!
You know when God bless some people, they think They think they are next to God, , I just pray that God help him to know Bad from Good,
is elon truly a rasamann cooli natty bighy?
🧓🧓🧓🧓🧓🧓🧓🧟🧟🧟🧟🧟🧟🧟🧝🧝🧝🧝🧝🧝🧝🧝🧝🧙🧙🧙🧙🧙🧙🧙🧙🤶🤶🤶🤶🤶🤶🤶👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳👩🦳🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡😵😵😵😵😵🤪🤪🤪🤪🥴🥴🥴🤡🤡