Battle of al-Qadisiyyah 636 - Muslim-Sassanid War of 633-654 DOCUMENTARY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 янв 2018
- In one of our previous videos, we covered the battle of Yarmouk ( • Battle of Yarmouk 636 ... ) between the Byzantine Empire and the Islamic Rashidun Caliphate. This battle largely defined the fate of Eastern Mediterranean, but to the East, Caliphate had another global power to contend with - the Sassanid Empire. Two empires fought each other for more than 20 years, across dozens of battles with the campaign of the Muslim general Khalid ibn al-Walid in 633 and the battle of al-Qadissiyah that took place in 636 being the most crucial among them.
Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
We are grateful to our patrons, who made this video possible: Fahad Al Mandil, Rene Malmgren, Ibrahim Rahman, Koopinator, Daisho, Łukasz Maliszewski, William Fluit, Juan Camilo Rodriguez, Murray Dubs, Félix Gagné-Dion, Fahri Dashwali, Kyle Hooton, Dan Mullen, Mohamed Thair, Pablo Aparicio Martínez, Iulian Margeloiu, Chet, Nick Nasad, Jeyares, Amir Eppel, Thomas Bloch, Uri Sternfeld, Georgi Kirilov, Mohammad Mian, Daniel Yifrach, Brian Crane, Muramasa, Gerald Tnay, Hassan Ali, Richie Thierry, David O'Hare, Christopher Commins, Chris Glantzis, William Pugh, Stefan Dt, indy, Bashir Hammour, Mario Nickel, R.G. Ferrick, Moritz Pohlmann, Russell Breckenridge, Jared R. Parker, Kassem Omar Kassem, AmericanPatriot, Robert Arnaud, Christopher Issariotis, John Wang, Joakim Airas, Nathanial Eriksen, Joakim Airas, Chuan Kit Kee, John Padalis, Raphaël Dordeins, Donovan Moore, Howie Truong, Chuan Kit Kee, Håvard Siegel Haukeberg, ccplz, Tepes Obrejac, Jon, Emil Johansson, Patrick Riordan, Marc Kuiper, Qamil Lita, Jack Roelofs, Fernando Henrique, iMattyz, Rbj, Matthew Levy and Virgo Susilo .
This video was narrated by our good friend Officially Devin. Check out his channel for some kick-ass Let's Plays. / @offydgg & / @gameworldnarratives
The Machinimas for this video are created by one more friend - Malay Archer. Check out his channel, he has some of the best Total War machinimas ever created: / mathemedicupdates
✔ Patreon ► / kingsandgenerals
✔ PayPal ► paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
✔ Twitch ► / nurrrik_phoenix
✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Facebook ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Steam ►steamcommunity.com/id/nurrrik
Inspired by: BazBattles, Invicta (THFE), Epic History TV, Historia Civilis and Time Commanders
Machinimas made on the Total War: Attila engine
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
Songs used:
Andreas Ericson - Exedition
Stefan Netsman - Arabian Night
Johannes Bornlöf - Barbarians
Rannar Sillard - Deathmatch 3
Rannar Sillard - Guitar Textures 1
Henrik Neesgaard - Journey Through The Desert
Magnus Ringblom - Marching In
Magnus Ringblom - Welcome to the Djungle
New and updated video: ruclips.net/video/r2cEIDZwG5M/видео.html
I like how in the new video a different version of the battle is depicted. Shows that there is not a definitive agreed version.
I admire your sincerity to your work.. even the Muslims have underrated this great general Al Walid, but you have shown us his greatness and that's very admired..
ain jallout battle
@Jojo Momo He only killed omar.
Arab caliphate Omar was killed by Piruz Nahavandi after Persians' defeat.
"He also won against the allied sassinid byzantine army"
You say that so casually.. he defeated the combined forces, tactics, and technology of the two greatest empires at the time.
@DT nope, they actually didnt harm any innocent person as they were ordered.
He was a good commander. But the main reason he was able to defeat the Byzantine and Sassanids was because two great empires had spent the previous 30 years fighting each other over the Levant, and weakening their nations to the breaking point. Without the Byzantine-Persian wars Khalid's chances would have been much lower.
@@TonyTars the Arabs were outnumbered in all fights anyway, and they lost almost none, the result would've been the same in the end, it might just have taken longer. Keep in mind that he also isn't the only good general the Arabs had, they also had the better fighters winning all those duels.
Ofcourse, them being weakened helped, but I wouldn't say that it was the main reason.
@@abdmzn You bring up having better fighters in duels. How many of the best Persian and Byzantine fighters do you think had already died by the time they took on the Muslims?
In fact let's reverse the scenario: the Arabs fight for 30 years, then try to take on the fresh armies of Persia and Byzantine!
There is no way we can ignore the three decades of war and the effect they had on the Persian and Byzantine armies. It's simply not fair or logical.
The Persians even had a civil war for 3-4 years AFTER the 30 year war, right before taking on the Arabs! Despite all that, it took Arabs 20 years to occupy all of Persia. If it took 20 years for Persians to lose after decades of fighting the Byzantines and among themselves, I honestly don't think Arabs would have been able to defeat them under normal conditions.
@@TonyTars it only took 20 years because it was a large Empire and wasn't easy to occupy by the Arabs while fighting the Byzantines, after the events of this video, it was clean up basically.
And no, it really doesn't matter, the Arabs still had a massive disadvantage in numbers and technology, and they won against both Empires, losing close to no battles.
Important note about the battle. Muslim reinforcements were ordered to come in a small steady stream of reinforcements to make it seem like it was a never ending supply of new warriors. This was made to boost the morale of the muslim fighters and instill fear in their opponents. What the sassisinids didn't know is that some of those ''reinforcements'' were actually troops who were ordered to leave the army and come back in waves. Psychological warfare, muslim generals of that time were something special.
Interesting note.
@nimmivids they had spies instead of feeding false intelligence,i wasn't aware that much of it too until i stumbled on a podcast of a History war analyst that emphasised on this aspect of the strategies and why early Muslims, were so successful in intelligence without using woman to lure men in bed and use wine for obtaining secretes i think this is unique to Muslims back in the day...Man we still don't know much i must re-visit the history of that era and learn more now with different level of understanding and point of views
Isn't that during the battle of Mu'tah? Khalid faked reinforcement to stop the Byzantine army from pursuing a retreating Muslim army.
@@fadlya.rahman4113 if i remember correctly, it was against Persian Army when they had trouble fighting Elephants, Before Oubaida Ibn aljarah, sick on bed dying figured it out that pikeman and archers should aim for elephant's eyes instead of it's body
@Saeed Alfalasi cowardliness and brothers killing each other for wealth and woman is present across all human History ( i bet you know story of Able and Kan)
the only variable here is the good's people reaction, and it doesn't matter if they are few if we learn anything from history numbers isn't really a factor in winning. it's when the good people start fighting back that matters
what you should say is people now are numb and this won't be forever
Logic: attack the Persian empire then when you subjugate it turn to the Byzantine empire.
Khalid Ibn Al-Walid: I don't have time for that, combine the two and meet me in the battlefield in 10 minutes :3
Yaaaaaaaaaa👍👍👍👍👍😆😆😆😆
Khalid ibn alwaleed be like:: hurry up you two big guys I have other missions to accomplish also
Hahahahaha
Man this was savage
Savage tho
The Muslims conquered Persia within few years, something that the Roman were unable to do despite fighting for over 400 years.
@Jakeeyy1009
Seljuks haven't conquered all of Byzantinian empire, they just moved forward a little bit, the eastern part of Byzantinian empire was already a part of the Arabs, Haran, Al Ruha, were Anatolian cities that were a part of the Arab empires.
Caesar wouldve done it if they hadnt killed him
@Jakeeyy1009 arab didn't conquered whole of it but Muslims Turks did it
@Jakeeyy1009 yes, the eastern roman empire had suffered from a different invasions, it's hard to servive in such situations
@Jakeeyy1009 Do you know why the Sassanid Empire failed or where the Sassanid descendants are now? Do you know that before the Sassanid civil war, the kings of Eastern Rome had to respect the Sassanid kings and the Sassanid kings were called the king of kings? Do you know that the Sassanid army defeated the 300,000-strong Turkish army with only twelve thousand men? But why did they lose to the Arabs if the Arabs had already attacked the Sassanid rule but were easily repelled?
I believe Al-Walid deserve his own series. A very underrated general. Great video
Thanks.
Bitch please.
@@evilleader1991 Yeah you are wrong though
Those 100 battles included 1 on 1 duels
Tell me how he was outnumbered in those?
@@JasonDoe1000 that 1 on 1, that enemy's ego was equivalent to 1000 people...while Khalid has no ego if he had one why didn't he fight back against Umar ibn khatab when he removed him from being a commander and even after being removed he still help the other commander who succeeded him...do you know why he was removed because people are starting to idolize him because of him being undefeated instead of thinking its from God. With his popularity he can have a follower to revolt but he didn't.
hes a badass no doubt
According to Islamic sources, Ibn Waleed was so successful in his wars, so the soldiers under his command started to speculate that they win all the time because of their leader. Umar talked to Al Waleed and took all his commanding titles away from him, before the speculation damaged the soldiers religious belief against an unbeatable iconic figure. Al Waleed took the decision very politely and joined the army back again as a regular soldier.
That's true. Omar was always mindful to keep Muslims faithful, and to put God first.
ms wpwm The Islam as religion did not spread through sword the state or the Islamic empire did
When you read in history you will find out the we Muslims did not force anyone into the Islam. yeah we force Jezeia (the money that you pay for believing in religion other than Islam) but still we can consider it as taxes of some sort even the amount that they pay were not to expensive according to some historians. we Muslims pay more in zakah ( which is a charity that you have to give to the poor people after Ramadan in the first day of eid)
Of course I am talking about what usually happened after taking the land
before taking the land we give the three choices war, believing and jezeia
ms wpwm and about the terrorist those people are even condemned in Islam we are not making heros of them actually they were exist even back day in the Islamic golden age we call them the The Kharijites they believe that every sinner is non believer they have the same ideas of isis
And the made a lot of troubles for the Kalefa back then
ms wpwm well I cannot deny this these wars and battles are use to brainwash people to join to isis and the other terrorist groups
But c’mone anything can be used in good or in bad
these wars were huge success that they put its mark in the history and put the foundation of the Islamic culture
You can’t blame people for being proud of their ancestors look I know that war not a good thing but these wars were needed to establish the cultures back then
ms wpwm ok criticize Islam but don’t tell us to change our faith to fit your beliefs or your culture
From my prospective of view I think that religion should not be change otherwise it will lose its divinity and holiness
All those religions that you are mention did not get the same hate or the same attack that Islam get through the history so people when criticizing Islam criticize the fact that Islam is not accept liberalism our the western morals and that not fair
Sassanids: We have you 6 to 1
Khalid: I like those odds
Khalid did not lead in lost battle. He was in syria.
Mohammed ابن سليمان
Khalid born in Saudi Arabia
In Makkah
Sassanids: Alemko com you watch too much fake news
Khalid: He is a fool let him be we need these guys in Islam
Omar it was the arabian peninsula not saudi arabia as the hypocrites of Al saud wasn’t there
@@user-hl2xs3oc9m no it's Saudi Arabia 💚🙏
How they defeated the Byzantines and Sassanids at same time, is incredible
God with their said
Actually Islam born In Persia
Rashidun Caliph from Sasanid Empire
@@bourbon4707 😂😂😂
@@bourbon4707 Glory be to the one who made you weak so that you could relate the history of others to you
the enemy leader sent a message to al walid threatning him that he have to retreat as they outnumber him , he responded with a message says " i came to you with a people that love dying as much as your men love living "
high eagle this is against Roman Empire, in battle of Yarmouk.
metal as fuck lmao
@@khalduras784 lmao
when al waleed was on his bed dying he said "I have fought in a hundred battles and there is no inch in my body has ether a blow by sword or throw with arrow or stab with a spear and here Im dying on my bed " he said that because he want to die in battlefield like the other martyrs , May Allah have khaled ibn Al waleed in his paradise with his Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
This Also proves for us Muslims, Allah Gives you Life and Death when he wishes. Otherwise the whole world can't kill you if He (Allah) don't want you to die. Thanks For commenting this.
Colonel Josef and when he was told why he never martyrs Bec he was given name Sword of God! And no sword of Allah can be broken by any man!
Because he was "Saifullah"
Sword of Allah.
Sword of Allah can't be broken. So nobody could kill him.
sir, ibn waleed was called as the sword of allah...so that if he dies in a battle, it will be said Allah's sword is broken... Allah wants him not to die in a battle
Allah won't allow His sword to break in a battle field. That Sword is special.
Arab sources say that Khaled bin Al-Waleed never lost a battle in his life, even when he was against the Muslims at the beginning of his life, this great man
@@sasaniansoldier7118 Do you want the Arabs to unite and beat your ass again?
@@sasaniansoldier7118 dont say this if you are living in Iran former Sasanid empire
@@sasaniansoldier7118 ah yes a keyboard warrior which is one of the lowest class of warrior throughout the history...rip man you could've been a better person but instead you chooses to be one of those pathethic people
Sasanian are history. Muslims are the present and we dominate.
@@sasaniansoldier7118 we kicked your sasanian ass before, wanna go again? Bitch
"We have 30 books left from Muslim Andulasia so that we could split an atom, if half of the 1 million burned books could survive we have already travelled between galaxies in space" - Pierre Curie
very well said! thank you Shaikh Azam
😂😂😂😂 joke
@@MM-qh9yh that's a fact jackass, not a joke
Wait, is this true?
@@MM-qh9yh truth hurt right ?
If there would be something like RUclips Oscar, you would have got one!
That is a high praise, thank you very much! I watched a few of your videos - you are doing great! Best of luck!
Wouldn't mind it. :-)
Nope, even though Kings and Generals is pretty solid, the RUclips Oscar goes to Historia Civilis, that dude makes you feel like watching a movie.
+Stormy Molnjavichen dude. :-)
+Zee Hans Oscar shaped, please. :-)
"He also won against the allied sassinid byzantine army"
its like Zimbabwe to win a war vs USA & Russia
they would never admit the might of Islam. They would either brush it aside or invent a cock and bull story. Ignorance at its best.
@@alvirarahman1559 agrreed
😂 😂 😂 😂 👍 Bro
Criminology M.A. Muslims will rise again and rule the world
@Criminology M.A. but what happened when Al Waleed was fighting with your ancestors? Even 5 to 1 majority cannot defeat us **
Khaled bin Al-Waleed never lost a battle in his life, even when he was against the Arabs Muslims at the beginning of his life, this great man
Pan-Iranist [Iranian Ultra Nationalist]
He smacked your empire to the ground man 😂😂 if he was horrible what does that make you ? Nonsense 😅
Lost mu’tah
@@maddmaddox1648 No he did'nt Khalid was not highest commander in mutah there were three commanders in that army Prophet Muhammad ordered muslims to to choose on of them if anyone fell but three of the commander lost thier lives fighting so muslims give command to Khalid Ibn Walid he ralied the forces and ordered a organized retreat to save muslims
General Khalid ibn al Walid is truly great..love from india
Just look at this.. each time the muslim faught. The enemy outnumbered them.. but it is not the number which wins in a battle.. it is the will power to fight until death
Jan Dom it is the power of fighting for a higher cause , to spread monotheism amongst people who were enslaved by their leaders and paganism..
@@elixir7400 If you can get people to fight in the name of God, they will fight till death.
Its not the numbers that prove their braun it's their tactics. So heck off.
Because they had jihad spirit in their Hearth back there not us who di gaming all day and watch stupid cartoon
@@elixir7400 the people they were fighting were not pagans, though. Most of them were either Christian, Jewish or Zoroastrian.
This tradition of single combat before battle is pretty fascinating, especially when it's between the highest commanders from both sides.
they were real men i imagine single combat with swords by trump the baboon vs kim
for real. just like when Achilles told Agamemnon, "imagine a king who fights his own battles, wouldn't that be a sight"
Khalid though didn't fight single combats as far as I know. I think he is too smart to do that.
read more brother Khaled always challenged the enemies commander in duels but they were too smart not to accept .. because rip to those who accepted.
Khaled was one of the very few who always fought dual blades and moved the horse with his legs .. the only mentioned warrior who did that as well in the Muslims was (Al-Zubair ibn Al-Awwam)
Radical Theories butthurt
What absolutely amazes me the contempt, the hate of Hazrat Khalid ibn al Walid RA towards cowardice.
Even his last words were:
"May the eyes of coward never sleep."
Defeating two empires at the same time is not an easy thing. It requires courage, valor, strength and victory from God.
It's also because of the dangerous ideology of Mohammed that promised Arabs wealth and women in both lives. If you die, you'll be in heaven with huris and if you manage to defeat the Romans and Persians, you'll be able to plunder their wealth and rape their women and take them in to slavery!
@@soniahemmati2372 The coward, if you give him the money of the whole earth, will not fight bravely. That's why you have to recognize the superiority of the Arabs.... Before Islam the Arabs fought with the Persians in the battle of Dhi Qar and the Arabs won
Both iran and roma were in a century of war, here you go thats why.
It's great that fans are suggesting battles from this era. I never expected anyone to chronicle these since the Rashidun caliphate is one of the most underrated of all conquering powers in history and Khalid bin Walid, easily the most underrated general of all time.
I hope you keep covering battles from this era and also do other ones on Khalid
I wouldn't call Khalid bin Walid underrated. In Europe perhaps, but ask anyone in the middle east who is the greatest general of all time, they will answer Khalid bin Walid. (or maybe Saladin)
He's not underrated, the empire he built is.
People are focused on Mohammed and Mohammed only, when the fact is without Khalid, probably Islam wouldn't be the second biggest religion today
Khalid Bin Al Waleed is the master of speed in the war.
Khalid's talent was only in war, the Prophet was excellent in many ways.
During this battle, the Arabs built elephant like statues and made their horses sleep near them at night in order to get used to fighting elephants. Arabian horses are smart they adapted and on the final day they did not panic around elephants and that helped the arabs gain an advantage.
Very interesting
Hannibal would be proud
Hm... I don't know if that is true. I read (second punic war) that horses run from elephants because of there smell. Yet, Hannibal's horses were used to them.
Arabs could not bring smell on theirs models of elephants.
@pharaonicvs I was talking just about elephant statues and sleeping horses near them.
I didn't know about dressing camels. But interesting :)
interesting note. could u provide me the source?
this is when faith defeats numbers
true
True
Nay this is when brilliant strategies of Khalib ib Al walid met the roman and sassanids
Exactly
i think mainly the ingenuity of kahild bin walid.
If it were strictly due to faith muslims wouldnt have lost in battle of Uhud, when muhammed himself was leading the army. They were against khalid bin walid, his strategies won his wars even when he was a belligerent to muslims.
Takbeer.... Allaho Akbar
Another thing remained unmentioned..
Khalid ibn Walid fought more than 100 battles, but died UNDEFEATED.
@@medianempire8685
Where do you belong, rat?
@@mohaimenulimam233 Let him be bro
Wallahi he doesn't in any way touch the might of islam history nor any of my feelings. However I can clearly smell his rage because he has nothing to say watching this video. قل موتوا بغيظكم
@@nassimbenslimane
You are right..
@@medianempire8685 that's all you can do...
and how do you think that reduces value of islam or sacred scripture??
Anyway may God guide you to islam.
@@medianempire8685 come to Islam, worship only Allah and nobody else, he is your creator
Duel with khalid they said
It will be fun they said
hahaha
Shapur the great what Israel has to do with Khalid? Killing a small child with a stone in his hand is not something special bro
Samer Nattifi The numbers were initially 29,667 Israel vs 13,000 Arab, but eventually turned into a maximum of 117,500 Israel vs 63,500 Arab.
@@Pt_Lacky let's not forget how soem Arabs govt supports pissrael
@Samer Nattifi where the resource, please add link
Khalid Ibn Al-Walid was truly a legendary commander, probably the mightiest in history.
He earned his title: "The sword of God"
@Belmin Hodzic Shut up, you know why allah's sword because it was bloody like allah
@Belmin Hodzic Do not be a bitch, I hate Islam, I am Iranian, you know a Shapur from all Iranian names, idiot, I do not like the name of Amir, we Iranians are not Muslims and we do not like Islam, why do you support bloody Islam?
@Belmin Hodzic I must say that our ruler is apparently a Shiite and the people do not like Islam. If you do not know Shiite is Zoroastrian because we Iranians made it Iranian, we added Zoroastrian and Iranian customs and laws to it. I hate Islam because it is because they destroyed books and cities and killed people. I hope you have a good day too
@Belmin Hodzic where are you from
@Belmin Hodzic I do not understand what you mean
Everyone in the comment section talking about Khalid Ibn Walid, meanwhile commander who behind this masterpiece was Saad Ibn Abi Waqqas and Al-Qaqa Ibn Amr At Tamimi 😭
This video makes Al Walid's continuous wins against so many armies in the first part so casual, but in an awesome way !
SaracenCount he was a genius! He won all battles with less than 20 000 men!
The tactics of Al-walid proved that he was a greatest genius military comander
IT S WAS VERY VERY INTELLEGENT
Al Walid was his father... call him Bin Walid (son of Walid)
How about Alexander The Great
"Victory comes only from Allah "
@@rinharter7758 absolutely
Khalid never lost a war, enemies pissed when they heard his name.
Level❤️
You talking about Ghengis Khan,anyone didn't know him 😂😂😂
@Qazi Waqas 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦💩💩💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦💩🇸🇦💩🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
@@cenanmehmet that Genghis Khan not meet khalid the sword of Allah
Genghis also pissed in his pants if he meet him once The undefeatable Khalid bin Waleed
It was because of what he had under his helmet!
Do you know that battles of AL-Qadsiyaah and Yarmouk took place in two months of that time period.
Muslims used to be great war tacticians. If you read their history, you will find out that in many cases while outnumbered by the opposition still they managed through war tactics, high morale and incredible leadership to eventually win.
You missed a MAJOR point, Elephants didn't ran back and drowned themselves in river for no reason, Saad(R.A) sent forward his camels wearing black curtains and sheets on them with heavy roaming voices, which obviously panicked elephants.
When I see otoman battles, I cry... the heart of christianism a so beauty, avanced technologically land like Bizance destroyed by a cult of a pedophile of desert😭😭
@@luanlopes9415 And that insult was really unnecessary, muslims in general were never known to be pedophiles, you shouldn't talk that way about the people. And the ottomans were mostly not arab people coming from the desert, they were mixed people with a variety of ethnicities and origins (Arminians, Slavs, Kurds, Turcs...etc)
He ordered his men to hit the nose of the elephant because that’s a special point so they ran back and killed their own ppl
Both religions are non sense in fact all religions are made up to control amd divide !
@@danielperez232 you are repeating a statement you heard from an atheist who heard from another atheist and form another. Rationalise by yourself and being atheist doesn't always mean you are right because of science. Science is constantly changing its not fixed how can you believe in something that changes regular
What a gap between civilizations we have today, we westerners know and greet so many generals but I am sure that many of us haven't heard of this extremely good general Al-Walid.
We are tribalistic, no question about it.
Convict Con He was a man of great honor. He was nicknamed (the sword of Allah) by the prophet Mohamed. Never lost a battle before accepting Islam or after accepting it. An absolute beast...a warrior.
Maybe its because of Islamophobia that our news channels injecting in us. He was a great general never told to us.
Well it goes both ways. I wish we could have been taught more about the western civilization as well.
Khalid bin Al-walid better then millions
The icons used for leader names is the most beautiful arabic calligraphy I've ever seen, well done!
Khalid bin waleed رضي الله عنه the sword of Allah ❤️❤️🇸🇦🇹🇷
Fuck omar
@@ukraine-russiawar126 but hurt Persian rafidi here 😆😆😆
@@ukraine-russiawar126 رافضي 😒
it's rare to see these two flags together nowadays ☹.
politics is the Devil tool
"Allahum join our hearts, mend our social relationship, guide us to the path of peace, bring us from darkness to light, save us from obscenities, outward or inward, and bless our ears, our eyes, our hearts, our spouse, our children, and relent toward us; Thou art the Relenting, the Merciful. And make us grateful for Thy blessing and make us praise it while accepting it and give it to us in full"
greeting from Saudi Arabia.
@@ukraine-russiawar126 اینجا چیکار میکني عجم😂
The generals went at it one on one? Now that’s some old school badassery there
Yep, the Sassanid tradition demanded it.
the last badass in military history was G.S.Patton he wanted to fight Rommell tank to tank !!
Kings and Generals lool it's an Arab tradition. Checkout Arab pre-Islamic history if you want to learn more about yhe signficant of these pre battle duels... Also a good pre-Islamic Arab Sassinid Battle is Thi Qar.
Kings and Generals True,the sassanid challenge al waled and he accept it.
;
This was the one two punch that pushed the Early Islamic conquest unto the world stage. A massive blow to the Byzantine at Yarmouk and this battle gave the offensive initiative to the Arabs. In the course of the next 100 years the Caliphate would spread from Al Andalus in Spain to the Indus River valley - nicely done!
Indeed. We plan to cover the movement to the East. Let's see how it works. :-)
The death of the last Sassanid emperor was particularly moving.
one of the decedent of the Persian emperors ended up one of the founding father of Pakistan. Liaquat Ali Khan
Flash Point History, bro can u plz show me roman or western sources of this battle
Affan Ahsan
Byzantine almost don't have a record about the battle. About Persian, I don't know. Maybe they don't want to write it because they lose? Who knows? Only God who knows the answer.
Great video guys , i love history and love how you narrate the battles in detail
"Ana Khalid bin walid"(i am khalid bin walid).. this loud sentence of khalid RA was usually enough to demoralise the enemy...
"I know more about Khalid than anyone else, no man is luckier than he. No man is his equal in war. No people face Khalid in battle, be they strong or weak, but are defeated. Take my advice and make peace with him."
Prince Ukaid of Domat ul Jandal. (633 A.D)
هههههههههه i read about that to
he is blessed from god....
may he rest in peace
Absolutely right ....He is sword of Allah
Hmm
Ali bin Abi Talib better than khalid
ابن بلاد أورك al Muhajir bin Khalid bin alWaleed was in Ali’s army while his brother Abdulrahman bin Khalid bin alWalid was in Muawiya’s army
Six more Sassanid armies were sent against him and Al-Walid be like: "Come at me bro"!
I like those odds
come to papa
@Jojo Momo for chicken just say Bismillah
@Jojo Momo yeah, i just want to remind you about hadith Prophet Muhammad Saw. That if you eat halal food from non-muslim (which is not slaughtered by Allah's name) before you eat say Bismillah.
@Jojo Momo
I step on Qur'an and Islam
The Sassanids: "We have 40 elephants!"
The Rashidun: "We have Khalid ibn Al Walid!"
The leader of Al-qadisiyyah was Saad Ibn Al-Waqas
@Mahdi Jannati كس ام الخميني كس ام ايران انيك ايران
@Mahdi Jannati الخليفة عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه دعس رأس كسرى
@Mahdi Jannati فتحنا فارس وهزمنا كسرا ودمرنا الامبراطوريه الساسانية عمر بن الخطاب وسعد بن أبي وقاص دمر الامبراطوريه الايرانية
@Mahdi Jannati
وشفيك معصب؟ شفلك قبر تبرك به وهد نفسك 😂😂😂
some sources even say that there were more than 140,000 Persian troops.
What an extraordinary victory
كانوا 200 الف
“Do not say that! How few are the Romans and how numerous are we ! 'An army's strength lies not in numbers of men but in Allah's help, and its weakness lies in being forsaken by Allah”
-- Khalid ibn al-Walid
Allahu'akbar
How few are we .. how many are the romans **
Sure you have your heroes we have ours.
Anyways what heroes do you guys have? Your ancestors were tyrant specially the rulers
Life With S. Christian armies rule this world in case you didn’t notice
If you lead 40k men against 20k enemies, why tf would you agree to a personal duel?
Frederick the Great its a matter of pride
Honor
Nope. I was already like, stop dueling!
If you lead a significantly stronger army, personal duel is about the worst thing you can do, in terms of tactics. Pride, honour? The commander was supposed to lead his me and win the battle, this way he got killled, caused demoralization of his army and potentially caused fall of the two of the most ancient empires - the Persian and the Roman. But I guess at least he preserved his honour...
+nimmivids Yes, but only if you have the smaller army. When your army is twice the size of the enemy, its most likely better odds to just use your superior strenght to win the battle.
Khalid Ibn al Walid was the best General in the world at his time
And in history too
The effect of his achievements still existed until today ! Every inch he liberate and conquer still in the hands of Muslims for 14500 years ..
He a student of the messenger of Allah Mohamad , and Khalid is the sword of Allah
When I read history and see how the Arabs suddenly turned from scattered tribes into a superpower that defeated all the kingdoms and empires of the earth, I realize that Muhammad was a great prophet f and really had the help of God
Of course. There's no other explainetation
Help, not power
your so-called jackass prophet could've also been a schizophrenic child sex abuser
Does that mean that God likes bloodshed? If not, then the death of many thousands was a "necessary sacrifice"? Then why did he not help to subjugate and convert the whole world to the "true faith".
@@dominikkacprzak
If you read history, you'll know that Muslims treated people humanely, unlike the Armanian and Persian Empire.
That's why many people have entered Islam, and those who do not convert to Islam prefer to be ruled by Muslims.
It boggles the mind. Khalid bin Waleed had like a 100% success rate. Most of the time the odds were not in his favor. Mind you, he was a general, one of the most difficult jobs in the world and to achieve a spotless record there may be the most impressive career of all time.
Well done video again! Thanks!
Arabs were nothing before Mohammed. They became absolute super power in 30 years. This is one of the greatest proofs for his prophecy.
@@runi5413 Even if that was true , in order to gather all these as you call "nomadic horse-cultured" and incredibly stubborn people while starting from scratch in a matter of 30 years , don't you think that is miraculous ?
@@runi5413 It's ok no offense taken .
It's true the conditions were similar , but you have to consider how Genghis Khan came to rule .
He killed a brother a close friend in order to rise up to power , allied himself with the Jin to take down the Tatar just to invade them later.
Genghis Khan's goals were materialistic , he fought for the spoils of war , Indeed he was a great military leader but with such materialistic ambitions meant that the greatest empire of his won't last and it did fall.
On the other hand Prophet Mohamed didn't start by killing anyone .
He only spread the word of God and sadly in return his followers were tortured and killed.
When he took shelter in madina they welcomed him as most of them converted to islam by their own choice .
And from there you can see a lot of battles started by the non-muslims which the muslims won , even though there was a huge difference in numbers (3:1 sometimes 4:1).
@@runi5413
The messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم establish peace sense he arrived at madinah with the 3 Jewish tribes
Bani al-Nader, Bani Qaenoqaa, and Bani Goraeda
the first two break their promise and try to kill him secretly so he command them to leave
The last one betrayed him in battle the prophet was surrounded by 10000 pagan Arabs around madinah and they did not manage to enter the city until the jews let them in and support the pagans with 5000 jews
In the end Allah supported his messenger with a cold strong wind that throw away the enemy camp and the jews were killed for what they did
يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ ٱذۡكُرُواْ نِعۡمَةَ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيۡكُمۡ إِذۡ جَآءَتۡكُمۡ جُنُودٌ فَأَرۡسَلۡنَا عَلَيۡہِمۡ رِيحًا وَجُنُودًا لَّمۡ تَرَوۡهَا ۚ وَڪَانَ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرًا
O you who have believed, remember the favor of Allah upon you when armies came to [attack] you and We sent upon them a wind and armies [of angels] you did not see. And ever is Allah, of what you do, Seeing.
إِذۡ جَآءُوكُم مِّن فَوۡقِكُمۡ وَمِنۡ أَسۡفَلَ مِنكُمۡ وَإِذۡ زَاغَتِ ٱلۡأَبۡصَـٰرُ وَبَلَغَتِ ٱلۡقُلُوبُ ٱلۡحَنَاجِرَ وَتَظُنُّونَ بِٱللَّهِ ٱلظُّنُونَا۟
[Remember] when they came at you from above you and from below you, and when eyes shifted [in fear], and hearts reached the throats and you assumed about Allah [various] assumptions.
هُنَالِكَ ٱبۡتُلِىَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَ وَزُلۡزِلُواْ زِلۡزَالاً شَدِيدًا
There the believers were tested and shaken with a severe shaking.
وَأَنزَلَ ٱلَّذِينَ ظَـٰهَرُوهُم مِّنۡ أَهۡلِ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ مِن صَيَاصِيهِمۡ وَقَذَفَ فِى قُلُوبِهِمُ ٱلرُّعۡبَ فَرِيقًا تَقۡتُلُونَ وَتَأۡسِرُونَ فَرِيقًا
And He brought down those who supported them among the People of the Scripture from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts [so that] a party you killed, and you took captive a party.
Al Quran 33 9
The end of mongols that they embrace Islam and follow our faith
@I NSA Where did you get the idea that Persia did not give the world anything,,no scientists ,, no books ,, no universities ..etc Actually, there was an “Iranian Golden Age” before the “Islamic Golden Age”, and the latter was actually a continuation of the former.
Ibn Nadim mentions a long list of pre-Islamic Pahlavi books which were still available in the 4th century A.H. in Baghdad. Have a look at that list (Al-Fihrist). Biruni also has mentioned a number of pre-Islamic books in his works, particularly in The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries - Wikipedia.
The works of Islamic scholars directly reference literature on various scientific, mathematical, philosophical, and theological disciplines from pre-Islamic Iran.
Biruni mentioned another story which shows there was a scientific tradition in Ancient Persia:
When Qutaibah bin Muslim under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to Khwarazmia with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whomever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian history, science and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing and hence their history was mostly forgotten.
So, there were books and libraries in Khwarazm (likely in Khwarazmian language) when Arabs invaded Iran.
However, in the early centuries of Islam, many Pahlavi books were translated into Arabic (the “current” language of science), and there was no need for those works anymore (so nobody cared to copy those books and they were lost). This way, at least the content of some of those books were preserved to some extent. Unfortunately, many of the translated works were destroyed during the Mongol invasion.
Also, read about Gundeshapur university in pre-islamic time in Persia- Wikipedia
And men were men, they knew the right way to conduct gender roles. Unlike pussies among Persians and Byzantinians.
Fun battle to hear about. Nice Job whoever made this video.
"100 Battles of Khalid" could make a huge series, please do that
@@medianempire8685 In reality your the one being stomped by Islam
@@medianempire8685 your are stupid
@@medianempire8685
It s nice to know you’re so cowards that you show your bravery on a book
But a book that is so defenseless is well served by the meaning of the words it has in it, which neither you nor those before you could ever dream to defeat
What the heck !!!! He khalid ibn al waleed RA..mopped every army that came in his way...this is something unbelieveable..😇😇😇😇😇
OSKESIS .....beleive it its not story
By the way "Khalid" in Arabic literally means "Immortal"!
خالد
Not literally
@@LeeTheKnight yes really 🙃!!!
@@LeeTheKnight Yes it does. Literally.
Literally it means "eternal"but immortal is a synonym of that.
seems fitting on him , he lives in our hearts
Very amazing to know all that details !! Thanks a lot
10:36
The One Who Killed Rostam Was " زهير بن عبدشمس البجلي " zohir bin abdshams albajly And He Said his famous sentence " قتلت رستم ورب الكعبة ! " I Killed Rostam I swear to Lord of the Kaaba
Got to admit that Khalid Ibn Walid was undoubtedly the toughest warrior throughout history. He led more than 100 bloody battle, less equipped, the enemies are always outnumbered, yet never lost a single war !! WOW just unbelievable !!
To add to above fought numerous 1 on 1 battles on almost all of the battles , Omar Razi Ullah tallah unhu rightly said "let the women grieve over khalid as no mother will give birth to another khalid al walid" Subhan ALLAH , Razi ALLAH Anhum Wa Razi Unhu
100 battles?
That is probably counting skirmishes as battles
@@artinrahideh1229 They were not skirmishes, but most of them were against armies of more than 10,000
@@user-wm1du1pu3i could you send a list of these battles?
@@artinrahideh1229 ا It's too many, but I'll give you some
How an emerging civilization like that challenges and wins over the two superpowers of the time fighting both at the same time is just insane.
Alexander Christopher here’s the thing though, when they were the Arabs, they were weak, divided, hated each other, and killed each other,
They never formed a country or any sort of United state,
This victory was for the Muslims not the Arabs!
Just look at what Arab nationalism has done to Arabs today, back to being weak and divided and hating each other.
And I say that as an Arab myself.
@@AM-bj7yo I'm not arab but I do hope someday that all the arabs will unite and love each other. There's nothing impossible to ALLAH. And when that happens, the turks and all other Muslim nation will join the unity. ALLAHUMMA ameen.
Commentsurfer your a turk?
@@HSQtr no I'm not.
@Imposing Patriot oh that's a load of crap . You cant even prove that these are all true.
May the eyes of cowards never find rest in sleep!
This itself enough to one islam.The way Army fought without rest and won can almost no army can do... Subhanallah
Khalid bin Walid (ra) , the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) named hım "the sword of Allah" and now you know why
@abcde fghij and American dick
@@user-cq5sn5hq4m /u mean your mom ass
Wow the sassinids had such massive armies.
But they were all crushed.
Amazing.
@@aydnmesuttorun8397 keep dreaming
Khalid Ibne Walid is the General on Earth who has never lost a battle, even when he was a non-muslim.
Kudos to this channel. We learned about Khalid Ibn Al Waleed from our school history book but there many people around the world who never knew about this great Commander who was also a companion of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
bro in this battle commander was saad bin abi waqas
That explains why Persians hate omar, it's because he destroyed the sassani Persians.
jake roberts exactly
Persians hate Arabs in general. Not because of conquering Sassanids, but because of forcing Islam into Iranian population.
So why do not you leave Islam now
Iran today is an independent country and the Arabs have no authority to prevent you from leaving Islam
Iranian version of Islam is watered down and mixed considerably with Zoroastrian traditions. Iranians are now using shia Islam to control and manipulate the Arab population to our advantage. Iran is supporting shias in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, etc. to gain more influence. Islam in Iran is dead. It's just a political tool to influence/control others.
But what we see in Iran is different
We see the clergy dominating the country
Islamic law is strictly enforced in Iran
The atheists are punished
Pleas Do videos on :
Battel of Badr
Battel of Khaybar
Battel of Uhud
Battel of Trench
Battel of Mu'tah
Battel of Tabok
I would be great and everyone will be shocked😅
Sam Supari You can watch those battles on Islamic Guidance and Merciful Servant.
i doubt they could be portrayed perfectly especially Badr, and to lesser account Tabook. by taking method of modern revisionism history discipline.
too much miracles flown on all reliable accounts of Hadith oral sources
only Allah almighty knows.
even i used to be involved in Wikipedia Battle of Mu'tah revisions & editings we have faced tough problems to meet the requirement of modern encyclopedic standard. too many disagreements between editors. which in the end we published the last conservative version. and whenever i looked again very much did not satisfy as too many critical firsthand sources information we decided to butcher many parts of it. hope you understand if i disagree with this idea
May Allah bless you
I step on Islam and Quran
@@medianempire8685 I step on your head
Your research on history is so good
Sassanid empire's downfall was decided on the day when Khusrau, The Shah of Iran tore apart Prophet Muhammad's(PBUH) letter sent to him and Prophet recalled that "Khusrau had predicted the death of his empire by tearing my letter."
how can you justify countless invades and slaughters and plunders and rapes and... just because of a piece of paper has been tore apart? seriously, i really am eager to know! please enlighten me!
Usha Day 😂😂😂💪🏽
The shah of Iran?
Both defining battles against the Byzantines (Battle of Yarmuk), and the Sassanids (Battle of Al Qadissiyah) occurred on the same year. Most of the same army was also used in Al Qadissiyah in Novemeber of 636.
Here's a short timeline on the major events 3 years before and after 636 AD:
633: Campaigns in Bahrain, Oman, Yemen, and Hadramaut. Raids in Iraq.Battle of Chains, Battle of Saniyy, Battle of Walaja, Battle of Ullais, Battle of Hira, Battle of Al-Anbar, Battle of Ayn al-Tamr, Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal, Battle of Firaz.
634: 22 August- Death of Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam. Umar ibn al-Khattab assumes power as the second caliph.
634: Battle of Bosra, Battle of Damascus, Battle of Ajnadin. Death of Abu Bakr. Battle of Namaraq, Battle of Saqatia.
635: Battle of Bridge, Battle of Buwaib, Conquest of Damascus, Battle of Fahl.
636: Battle of Yarmuk, Battle of al-Qādisiyyah, Conquest of Madain.
637: Conquest of Syria, Conquest of Jerusalem, Battle of Jalula.
638: Conquest of Jazirah (Mesopotamia)
639: Conquest of Khuzistan (Persia). Advance into Egypt. Plague of Emmaus.
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_7th-century_Muslim_history
Yep, that is a good timeline showing the key events.
Wikipedia is never a reliable source
@Dante Are you doubting the dates? Kindly elaborate.
It has nothing to do with "Muhammadan", "Francescan" or "Daoist" legends. It's a documented historic battle that is studied by all history majors in all reputable universities and even military academies.
"The legacy of the Battle of Yarmuk was both far reaching and profound. First, and most immediately, the defeat at Yarmuk led to the permanent loss of the entire Byzantine East (Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, and Egypt), which seriously undermined the Byzantine Empire’s fiscal and military capabilities."
Source: historycooperative.org/heraclius-and-the-early-islamic-conquests-an-analysis-of-byzantine-military-failure-at-the-battle-of-yarmuk-in-ad-636/
www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA494014
P.69-73
One of the most famous battles of the era of the early Arab conquests. You did it perfectly, K&G. I tell you as an expert on the history of the Arabs
Thank you :)
ENERGY do you just know how many things ancient nations in general did can be considered crimes against humanity using modern logic?
Basically their very existance was a crime against humanity
Where are your sources for what you claim
ENERGY these Arab army were more merciful then others as they didn't execute every disbeliever of the city
Which false historical event are you following
Did Arabs mainly used curved or straith swords at the time?
Six sassanid vs Khalid al-Walid
al-Walid: “believe me you don’t wanna do this”.
The sword of God which no one can defeat
Khalid ibn al-Walid(RA) Quotes:
- "When Allah decides a matter, it is done."
- "I have dedicated my life to the way of Allah, Most High."
- "Man intends one thing, but Allah intends another."
- "The earth destroys its fools, but the intelligent destroy the earth."
- "If you are truthful you will survive. If you lie you shall perish."
- "When I am in the battlefield, I love it more then when I am in my house."
- "The rainy night when I am standing wearing armor with sword and shield in my hand and looking again and again towards the eastern horizon, waiting for sun to rise so that I could start the battle."
One quote I like abt him
" فلا نامت اعين الجبناء"
"The way of Allah"
Committing warfare against unbelievers. That is the Islamic way.
"i came to you with people who love death as much as you love life" Khalid to a Sassanid commander
@@lennydale92 why can't you enjoy history, discuss it and learn from it while respecting everybody else who came for the matter? Warfare is a part is a part of every nation history whatever its causes were. Thus we should discuss it sophisticatedly instead of using it to unnecessarly cause strife and hate
@@chediamor3607
I would enjoy it if it wasn't for fanatical Muslims claiming it's a victory for their ideology. The same Muslims who will pretend it's a religion of peace.
SO AWESOME
Thank you, my friend!
that dude literally pulled a Hannibal with the crescent thing, that was fucking genious
+Kings and Generals ain jalut pless
NightFury_BR btw,he did the same trick against the Muslims and won.never lost a battle.he accepted Islam later.
Great stories! Thanks for videos.
These desert men have established an empire larger than Rome itself
Every campain of Khalid ibn Al-Walid deserve a documentary. From Uhud to Mutah to Yarmuk to Wallaja to Firaz to Iron Bridge. A true military genious. According to your policy you are making most of the decesive ones. Thanks for covering others too. I think "Sword of Allah" by A I Akram will be Helpful.
Ailee Georsua Ugh, another person who hates Islam, I get it now shoo, shoo!
Edin743, Al-Walid was a psychopathic murder!
Lion King ha you clearly haven't read anything about him.
dude t, Please check "Tabari" history book!
Lion King he wasn't a murdering psychopath he didn't kill people without a reason
Facing a muslim army..worst case scenario.Khalid Bin Waleed (RA) in command and calling u out for a duel
“How many small company has overcome a large company by permission of Allah. And Allah is with the patients.”
Ótimos vídeos! Aqui no Brasil é difícil encontrar matéria sobre História. Gostaria que todos os vídeos desse canal tivessem legenda em português.
Se os marroquinos não tivessem derrotado o time na Batalha dos Três Reis, o Brasil hoje seria uma colônia portuguesa, arabizada e totalmente arabizada, após a independência dos países latino-americanos e norte-americanos.
Fact : Khalid ibn Al walid did't lose a single battle in his life time
radhiallahu anhu
you and your khalid ibn walid suck it bitchs
despite being repeatedly heavily outnumbered and poorly equipped. and despite that he was surrounded by the two "super powers" of the age
Yes,but he did regret one thing, that he cannot die on the battlefield as a martyr, instead he died of old age.
mohd tibroni Azhar he died of disease. but Allah swt still might count him as a shaheed inshaAllah , because he sincerely tried to achieve it
how can you not love Al Walid ..
SOULREAVER you should either call him Khalid or ibn Waleed, but not Al Waleed because that was his father’s name.
if you are shia
If you are Iranian
Well, the past is past, we have a lot of influence in Syria and Iraq and Yaman now
I love him as an awesome warrior and general who lived and fought with honor, but I hate him for the cause he was fighting for and how this cause would grow so big and monstrous, directly because of his successes. Truly a conflicted feeling.
When i am in battlefield, I love it more then my wedding night with the most beautiful of women...(Khalid bin waleed)
Great work Kings and Generals! Can you please make a video on battle of Firaz as well!
to all muslims here praising muslim's victory ..
there is only one reason Allah gave them victory against these mighty empires ..
it was there righteous deeds and justice ..
human b eing
No, Arab warriors were ruthless, intelligent and tactical ,especially Khalid ,Islam only united them ,but Christian kingdoms in Europe were also united by religion ,this doesn't mean that Christianity is a true religion
@@sm1sm2sm3 if arabs were so strong why in the battle of alzab the persians destroyed them and ended the ummayed cilaphate
Christopher Carter He’s right. We only won, because of how righteous we were. We became divided when we lost our deen, and now the western forces take advantage of that, and even have documents that say Muslims should never be united. But In Shaa Allah we will be back. It’s been prophesied.
Christopher Carter As Muslims we believe Allah allows who He (SWT) wills to win. Muslims win, and lose. Heck we’ve been loosing a lot since ancient times has passed. When we lose our way. We lose. When we are on the right path we win. I’m just going by what my deen teaches us. There’s a reason for everything. We Muslims needed to lose badly to come back stronger In Shaa Allah
@@alimoradi8454
That's bcs the ummayads caliphs were on each other's throats
And then the abbasids ended their rains but it was Arabs not Persians Persians came later
It is amazing how Muslims won against two empires and at the same time
well these 2 empires were getting constantly attacked on multiple fronts, had plague and more economic problems coming from the fact that they were pretty old and never than less they were fighting eachothers since centuries, muslim surely did an amazing campaign but the empires were surely not at their peak
Sources certainly exagerated a lot the gap between the two forces.
Ask any real educated human being, Islam copied christianism. And christianism (like Islam) copied other religions or changed to adjust in other religions to gain poppularity.
And you can't prove that any god exists. Before comment again, tell him to meet me and then tell him to delete my comment :P
Also Christians teach in their colleges (theological colleges) that god doesn't exists and religions exist only to help people mentaly and help the poor. Thats why Christians are at the top of this planet and muslims beg to enter those countries.
ps My comment is still here, your god can't even find a free wifi :P
So Christians wrote a fairytale and Islam based on it and "correct it". Islam copied Christianity AND changed/added some things so the same power of the pope/patriarchs etc could go to their imams and leaders. Thats why there are a lot of versions of every religion and especially thats why you will find orders in quran and bible that suits the needs of the leaders and not the humanity in general.
I doesn't make sense? Quran accept jesus and other figures like older prophets as a vary important figures and messegeres of god, but at the same time they don't agree with them.. Like jesus was a very elect and highly esteemed messenger of God but all his students, so jesus too was a troll spreading lies. What a serious religion!
ps Your god still sleeping? Where is he? Are you going to prove that god exist or not? I mean its not that hard to prove that god exists, if he trully exist! I suppose he doesn't need a lift to come here! haha
@@giangargo669 ah yes the Sassanid Empire had been so weakened that it could send only 10 armies against Khalid.
الله اكبر 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
I felt like I was in the mid of the battlefield. I was breathing hardly. 10 Oscars you really deserve.
May ALLAH Grant this legend Khalid ibn Waleed (Saifullah) Jannatul Ferdaus 🤗
For killing 1 million Persians sure he will be in heavens for devil
@POWERFULL ENERGY *هل تتذكرني*
@Yusuf patel Persian Empire population was 3.5 million at that time and his army killed around 1 million people that's not my figures Iranian historians and Zoroastrian records says that.....Persian were civilised while Arabs were nomads and nomads were on killing spree like Mongols
سيف الله المسلول ❤
@Dingo Pelt yeah bcz it needs 100 years to butcher people raping women forcefull marriages ...jaziya taxes on non believers yeah it needs that much time ...
This guy is unstoppable...al Walid move fast as wild fire
the fact that the war equipment and tools on the side of the Rashidun caliphate is far behind the sasaniah's and still wins the battle and even destroying the sasanian empire is amaze me.
Do not say Napoleon, do not say Rommel, they are not worth anything in front of the best military commander in history, Khaled bin Al-Walid, Saifullah, who was never defeated.
كفووو 😂❤
@@GhGh-sj4wb
كفوك الطيب 👍🏼😂
10:23 you can make a full movie on the bravery of the muslim cavalry that marched on an entire army with no backup or reserve to kill rostam , AND made it back .
@black ops zombies i don't care what you think , i've never seen a division of a couple hundred men making a full frontal attack on a full army on it's own with no tactical advantage what so ever breaking through their ranks killing their leader . that's not tactics , just pure bad-ass courage .
Agreed. GOOSEBUMPS
This was an extremely underrated part of the video.
@Lari Muzzarelli
Shut up
The glory belongs to the tribes of Arabia 🇸🇦 🐎 99% of muslims today were not muslims yet during this battle .
Now I know why Muslim shiat in Iran hates Omar ibn alkatab
Exactly.
Actually , Shiat hate him because he took the power from Ali ... Ali was the one who advise him ton just send 1/3 of troops from levant to reinforce army in Qaddasiye ....
Well I'm also Iranian so don't use your nationality as excuse to hate since, Shia had always problems with other Muslim, they basically hate all prophet companions, his wives, and Khalifa
Plus early Iranian were all sunni and they had no hatred toward omar or others, you can see it in all famous poetry, God bless you:)
well , you don't see shia as muslims ( and that why you just see kiliing them is key for going to heaven ) so don't talk in shoes of iranian majority ... idiot ...
Hopefully hate on both sides will disappear. Iranians were the backbone of Islamic golden age and have a great civilization, sassan is just a dynasty that disappeared but Iranians remained
great video!
we sunnis we don't hate persians
soleyman -el- farsi was persian and first persian muslim and he was companion of prophet muhammed .
he was a traitor to his kin.
@@ser0t0ninaddict94 and brother to us
@@ser0t0ninaddict94
Islam is not skin catagory
@@mohammadnasser6715 don't recall saying it was
@@ser0t0ninaddict94
You said because he was the first Muslim Persian (iam not sure but the original comment says so)
So he is a traitor to your logic
please we need a video about Ain- Jalut battle between Mamluks and Mongols soon !!
Soon.
Kings and Generals thank u 😍😍😍
Great job but I want Japanese invasions
Kings and generals your the best
No Wonder Khalid ibn AL- Walid was nicknamed "The sword of Allah"
+Sidahmed El Guebli
wrong ... this didn't happen
he is named since he was the greatest general and a great worrier and after he converted to Islam he gave him the title
and from history we know that he didn't lose a war and he is one of the main reasons how Islam spread among the regions that previously controlled by the Sassanids or the Romans (that's why he is the sword of Allah)
Yes, you are right. I got my knowledge from a false video. May Allah forgive me. I just read that prophet Muhammad gave him the title ''Saifullah''
Edit: I deleted the comment for confusion.
it's ok my brother
we all humans and make mistakes
have a nice day
He is not my dick, son.
Very detailed videos 👍
Could you also discuss what kind of military the persians and the caliphate had at the time, just like you detailed the roman and mongol armies