Question: Is it possible to explain any previously unsolvable issue simple by placing the word quantum in front of it? For example: Quantum dark matter.
Thank you for that great initiative of making Q&A sessions with scientists! It's super interesting, but due to the sound quality, it was not very accessible. I am looking forward to the next session with a clean, noiseless sound!
@@NareimooncattThe two nasty white north European men bullied the poor Latina and failed to give her space to speak. The host failed abysmally to listen to Ms Latina to get clarification, and just said yeah yeah yeah without bothering to try to understand one word. Typical Fermilab male WASP-fest
Why "dark matter" instead of "dark space"? They should have the same effect, just in opposite locations, right? Dark space being 'inside' the galaxy, dark matter being a cloud around. Do you not get all the extra stuff you need by calculating the rotational velocity for a sphere instead of a disc?
Any Big Bang Lithium condenses to a liquid around 1600K and Lithium Hydride liquid forms around 1200K. Whenever these liquid molecules meet another, they consolidate into larger and larger drops. Should stat to hold hydrogen when it bigger than earth.
This question is not related to the topic.. but I thought that many wise people will look at this.. Time started with the big bang.. wasn't there movement before the big bang?
Try contacting the host of the radio show Coast to Coast George Norry or UFO specialist for the show George Knapp. Those three young scientists are disciples of Neil deGrasse Tyson with their depressive talk. Michio Kaku been on the show many, many, many times. Those young scientists are afraid Trump will fire them; I don't think Trump believes in Vulcans!!!
If Dark Matter is part of space-time and is difficult to detect and is so pervasive, and originated with the Big Bang, could it be at least a major part of space-time that we experience as time. I've been thinking of time as locational and how we experience the motion in the universe which is omnipresent (as Dark Matter seems to be). I also think of time as existing perhaps even materially as future and past that we pass through. Perhaps, locations of time cluster almost as alternative futures that might be experienced depending on whether space-time bends, and our vehicle (planet?) moves through a slightly different location than we seemed to be going earlier. Could Dark Matter be the time part of space-time that we experience as we move through space and different locations?
What if... dark Matter has an unconsidered origin. Below are only some of the current and past observations that can be answered by an addendum theory to space-time. Dark matter is isolated by observing, what is believed to be, gravitational lensing. But this lensing is not gravitational but optical. It is produced by a denser space. This denser space is created by the squeezing out of the particles of space by ordinary matter of a stellar structure. It can be observed as a halo. This halo can be stripped from its stellar origin as confirmed by the bullet cluster and others. Stripped, it can travel through the universe causing stellar structures (stars) to vanish if it becomes between an observer and say a star. Due to the nature of bending light, it is possible to create phantom structures as recently observed. The denser space slows down matter entering into this cloud. This slowing is responsible for the apparent violation of angular momentum of inner galactic stars. This slowing is most likely linked to early galaxy formation allowing the galaxy to form much larger than expected that early. Then space was much, much denser than even compressed space today. MOND is not needed to explain what is believed to be additional gravity but an understanding of an addendum to the physics of space is.
Question: How come the following logical fallacy hasn't yet been addressed concerning black holes? Fallacy: The graviton must obey the speed of light; and it would never escape, itself, the black hole. This would make the existence of black holes mutually exclusive to a particle theory of gravity. I suppose, this is what They (Hawking) meant when he reiterated: (para-phrasing) that QFT and general relativity would never (also) coexist - which seems like a convenient workaround. And, what ever happened to MOND? Since no theory of gravity is first-principle, wouldn't it make sense to challenge a theory of conic sections with phenomenological models?
@@guff9567 As my old snooty professors might've said "newton's law ISN'T first principle" (to out-do newton). But, perfection never fails to ensnare another mind.. None of them are first principle. Not even the action principle; but we'll never know for sure without trying. And, that means MOND, and admitting that we really just don't know for sure.
After 50 years, we still have no clue what it could be. For me it becomes more and more likely that dark mater doesn't exist and that we do not understand gravity
What if we don't need dark matter to explain how the univers.is. What if newton got it wrong and gravity is the push from the expansion of the universe and not a pull force at all. If gravity is the universal expasion, ie. every point of the universe expanding against every other point, gravity becomes mass getting in the way of the expansion of the universe. The points between masses then are either shorter points for the universe to expand against that are pushed together or masses over larger distances that are red shifted.
At 2.72K, dark matter is in superconductive state. Photons pass through it and there are two results. It generates the microwave background radiation and compresses the wavelength into red shift. After it reaches a specific end of red shift, it no longer effects dark matter. I have taken the properties of the CMBR and calculated dark matter mass to be 1.181 X 10^-39 kg. Dark matter makes up for the volume and mass discrepancies of the atom. A tightly packed nucleus binds stronger to dark matter and the electron cloud is less dense, hence the weak force. Electricity/electromagnetism is because of dark matter. The CMBR shows us the fabric of space which is dark matter, which is what we perceive as the gravity that moves the stars and planets. Dark matter is the glue that binds. It wants to hold on to everything. The attraction of dm in unbound atoms is gravity. I have calculated the number of dm particles in deuterium, then the volume of a dm particle, and the number of dm particles in a cubic metre of space. This answers the question in “A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME” as to the problem of “not enough time has passed for the universe to be so consistant”. It solves the problem with the double slit experiment. Light is a photon that generates a wave. When we observe the wave, the very act of viewing it (via light) the wave dissipates. It takes multiple photons passing through dm to sustain the wave. One prediction is that if you performed the experiment in space, the resulting wave would have the same properties as the CMBR. There is more, but I will save that for later.
I hope DOE having Hungarian businesses develop their Supedetectors. They build a shortwave radio broadcast station operating on 10 watts power!!! Nobody betta!!!
@@guff9567Sabine thinks that certain theories for dark matter are nonsense. E.g. axions. As long it is not proven otherwise, she doesn't exclude alternative theories, such as MOND
There is no dark matter, the whole fuzz about it, its a kinda process to keep physic-aficionados folks busy and provide them with lifetime lasting jobs :)
Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an Earthbound observer. It's what our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates for this reason.
Great talk, congratulations ...This video teaches new physics, hidden variables to study gravity, a demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter ruclips.net/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/видео.html
Bonjour
Don(s) of Fermilab, intriguing speculative assessments ♾️💎📜🗝
Very interesting, will have to listen again.
Thanks for the discussion.
Don of Fermilab, working on it ♾💎
Question: Is it possible to explain any previously unsolvable issue simple by placing the word quantum in front of it? For example: Quantum dark matter.
Thank you for that great initiative of making Q&A sessions with scientists! It's super interesting, but due to the sound quality, it was not very accessible. I am looking forward to the next session with a clean, noiseless sound!
Agreed. This is doubly important for people with heavy accents that are harder to understand, which I've found quite common with scientific fields.
@@NareimooncattThe two nasty white north European men bullied the poor Latina and failed to give her space to speak. The host failed abysmally to listen to Ms Latina to get clarification, and just said yeah yeah yeah without bothering to try to understand one word. Typical Fermilab male WASP-fest
Could Dark Matter have wavelengths in the size range of planets, stars, and even star clusters? The "particles" aren't small.
No particles have been observed
Ana's pitch is very similar to the squeak of the background machinery. When she speaks, I can hear the machines better.
Why "dark matter" instead of "dark space"? They should have the same effect, just in opposite locations, right? Dark space being 'inside' the galaxy, dark matter being a cloud around. Do you not get all the extra stuff you need by calculating the rotational velocity for a sphere instead of a disc?
What thickness is your disk please?
Any Big Bang Lithium condenses to a liquid around 1600K and Lithium Hydride liquid forms around 1200K. Whenever these liquid molecules meet another, they consolidate into larger and larger drops. Should stat to hold hydrogen when it bigger than earth.
This question is not related to the topic.. but I thought that many wise people will look at this..
Time started with the big bang.. wasn't there movement before the big bang?
Did ALL space evolve from big bang, and did ALL matter evolve from big bang?
I know exactly what dark matter/ dark energy is. Anyone know a good place to publish my theory?
Try contacting the host of the radio show Coast to Coast George Norry or UFO specialist for the show George Knapp. Those three young scientists are disciples of Neil deGrasse Tyson with their depressive talk. Michio Kaku been on the show many, many, many times. Those young scientists are afraid Trump will fire them; I don't think Trump believes in Vulcans!!!
Right here ... 👂👂👂
If Dark Matter is part of space-time and is difficult to detect and is so pervasive, and originated with the Big Bang, could it be at least a major part of space-time that we experience as time. I've been thinking of time as locational and how we experience the motion in the universe which is omnipresent (as Dark Matter seems to be). I also think of time as existing perhaps even materially as future and past that we pass through. Perhaps, locations of time cluster almost as alternative futures that might be experienced depending on whether space-time bends, and our vehicle (planet?) moves through a slightly different location than we seemed to be going earlier. Could Dark Matter be the time part of space-time that we experience as we move through space and different locations?
I think you're right. I'm sure all those neutron stars and galactic-core black hole are doing something fishy in there .
What if... dark Matter has an unconsidered origin. Below are only some of the current and past observations that can be answered by an addendum theory to space-time.
Dark matter is isolated by observing, what is believed to be, gravitational lensing. But this lensing is not gravitational but optical. It is produced by a denser space. This denser space is created by the squeezing out of the particles of space by ordinary matter of a stellar structure. It can be observed as a halo. This halo can be stripped from its stellar origin as confirmed by the bullet cluster and others. Stripped, it can travel through the universe causing stellar structures (stars) to vanish if it becomes between an observer and say a star. Due to the nature of bending light, it is possible to create phantom structures as recently observed.
The denser space slows down matter entering into this cloud. This slowing is responsible for the apparent violation of angular momentum of inner galactic stars.
This slowing is most likely linked to early galaxy formation allowing the galaxy to form much larger than expected that early. Then space was much, much denser than even compressed space today.
MOND is not needed to explain what is believed to be additional gravity but an understanding of an addendum to the physics of space is.
Thank you for considering this origin. You are clearly on the correct pathway.
Thanks, we will see if others are paying attention.
Question: How come the following logical fallacy hasn't yet been addressed concerning black holes?
Fallacy: The graviton must obey the speed of light; and it would never escape, itself, the black hole. This would make the existence of black holes mutually exclusive to a particle theory of gravity.
I suppose, this is what They (Hawking) meant when he reiterated: (para-phrasing) that QFT and general relativity would never (also) coexist - which seems like a convenient workaround.
And, what ever happened to MOND? Since no theory of gravity is first-principle, wouldn't it make sense to challenge a theory of conic sections with phenomenological models?
Show me the ‘Standard’ particle!
@@zweisteinya If physicists believe the particle theory, then they can't subscribe to black hole theory. And, they're not addressing that!
"phenomenological"
@@guff9567 As my old snooty professors might've said "newton's law ISN'T first principle" (to out-do newton). But, perfection never fails to ensnare another mind.. None of them are first principle. Not even the action principle; but we'll never know for sure without trying. And, that means MOND, and admitting that we really just don't know for sure.
After 50 years, we still have no clue what it could be. For me it becomes more and more likely that dark mater doesn't exist and that we do not understand gravity
Gladly ☺️
You could have tried better with a better microphone and less background noise
What if we don't need dark matter to explain how the univers.is. What if newton got it wrong and gravity is the push from the expansion of the universe and not a pull force at all. If gravity is the universal expasion, ie. every point of the universe expanding against every other point, gravity becomes mass getting in the way of the expansion of the universe. The points between masses then are either shorter points for the universe to expand against that are pushed together or masses over larger distances that are red shifted.
Very interesting. Needs some clarification
I think I have solved it but I missed the q&a
I wish people would learn to speak without misusing the pronoun "we". I was taught this at PRIMARY SCHOOL
If dark matter is not matter, detecting it with quantum computers would be impossible.
Did anyone say that Dark Matter is not matter? I haven't seen that.
At 2.72K, dark matter is in superconductive state. Photons pass through it and there are two results. It generates the microwave background radiation and compresses the wavelength into red shift. After it reaches a specific end of red shift, it no longer effects dark matter. I have taken the properties of the CMBR and calculated dark matter mass to be 1.181 X 10^-39 kg.
Dark matter makes up for the volume and mass discrepancies of the atom.
A tightly packed nucleus binds stronger to dark matter and the electron cloud is less dense, hence the weak force.
Electricity/electromagnetism is because of dark matter.
The CMBR shows us the fabric of space which is dark matter, which is what we perceive as the gravity that moves the stars and planets.
Dark matter is the glue that binds. It wants to hold on to everything. The attraction of dm in unbound atoms is gravity.
I have calculated the number of dm particles in deuterium, then the volume of a dm particle, and the number of dm particles in a cubic metre of space.
This answers the question in “A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME” as to the problem of “not enough time has passed for the universe to be so consistant”.
It solves the problem with the double slit experiment. Light is a photon that generates a wave. When we observe the wave, the very act of viewing it (via light) the wave dissipates. It takes multiple photons passing through dm to sustain the wave. One prediction is that if you performed the experiment in space, the resulting wave would have the same properties as the CMBR.
There is more, but I will save that for later.
I’ve been saying that for years!
@ I did this in 2012
@ we don’t have 4 fundamental forces. We have one fundamental partical, whose effects we presently observe in 5 different configurations.
I hope DOE having Hungarian businesses develop their Supedetectors. They build a shortwave radio broadcast station operating on 10 watts power!!! Nobody betta!!!
Could movement be an illusion and we only see the change in the matter field like a wave in a lake where water doesn’t move horizontal?
How many dark matters are on the flat earth?
Darn!!!!! I missed it!
❤
The panellists need to learn to speak without using the word "we"
Dark matter is neither dark nor it is matter.
True. It is a gravitational anomaly that does not absorb electromagnetic radiation
Next time, use a soundproof room and ask those who don't speak English to speak skowly.
Ask me any question about dark matter, dark energy and I will answer: 76% of dark energy + 20% of dark matter = 96% of my dark knowledge.
Sabine thinks it's nonsense.
What's her postulation?
@@guff9567Sabine thinks that certain theories for dark matter are nonsense. E.g. axions. As long it is not proven otherwise, she doesn't exclude alternative theories, such as MOND
Um um how they um um get jobs at um Fermilab um ?
There is no dark matter, the whole fuzz about it, its a kinda process to keep physic-aficionados folks busy and provide them with lifetime lasting jobs :)
Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an Earthbound observer. It's what our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates for this reason.
I wish I could give some advice to the communicator, try and be less monotone, more human.
Great talk, congratulations ...This video teaches new physics, hidden variables to study gravity, a demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter ruclips.net/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/видео.html