Neil Turok has very simple approach towards physics, that even reflects in his lectures. I watched many lectures of him on youtube and never saw anyone like him to explain things so simply and easily.
I enjoyed watching these interviews. Loved the humor and the breaking it down descriptive way for those of us not familiar with most of these things. Greatly appreciated this. Thank you. Am looking forward to more.
I think Brian Greene as a host/moderator is amazing as he makes sure the conversation flows in terms of the what the audience can digest. Thank you Brian.
@fiendin281 lol you think that wasnt on purpose?. Obviously he noticed they were giving too much info that they dont want certain ppl to know for certain reasons ;)
I personally wanted to hear how large amounts of antimatter could be contained but he interjected and prevented that from being in the video. Me not like that.
I used to read Elegant Universe in between taking tickets at Carousel Cinemas as comgr b4 9/11 when KSM Al Qaeda cell would come thru on weekends for black movies.
@@edwood6015 I thought the exact same thing, kinda odd that he cut them off. I get that he needs to keep the discussion on topic, but 30 seconds more wouldn't have killed him, and it was fascinating listening to them go back and forth.
What a privilege to be able to watch - even two years late - some of the most brilliant scientists in their fields in lively conversation on such an interesting topic. And with Brian Greene as the moderator who always puts things in perspective for laypeople. Thank you all.
@@cherrydragon3120 don't encourage him by giving him attention. Remember if they act like a spoiled child you should treat them as such and ignore them
These guys make they're professions and studies seem so easy and speak almost like they're just having an every day conversation (I realize it is for them).
Totally. And imagine just how well you would have to understand something to be able to make it comprehensible to the "rest of us." That's a REALLY impressive skill, if you think about it. Wow.
@Nemesis Explain how does one perceive an intelligent individual? I thought that all of the speakers here were highly intelligent with different views on certain subjects.
@Nemesis If you're an astrophysicist or a particle physicist then you're highly intelligent. Universities don't give science degrees and PHDs away. Making advances in science requires intelligent, creative and logical thinking. There's science behind physics theories - foundations in physics and maths. It's not guesswork. Scientists are constantly challenged by other scientists to prove their findings. A theory needs to be peer reviewed before it can even be published in a scientific journal.
@Igor Mateus I disagree with your idea that intelligence should be quantified by the ability to create knowledge. I believe intelligence should be defined by one's understanding of that knowledge.
This has got to be the best one so far. Could follow along with 90% of the discussion thanks to all the analogies and slides. Got a little lost during the neutrino talk, they set up how hard it is to catch and detect and it being electrically neutral but then at the end they said they just gonna shoot it 1000kms and split it with a magnet... Im guessing their is some explanation that was too hard to communicate in a discussion like this
All the particles that are not electrically neutral are removed from the beam leaving only the neutrinos. Or reverse the magnet so you get anti matter and when it decays neutrinos are in your decay product.
@@benjaminbeard3736 All the charged particles are stopped by the rocks the beam travels through. Where even gamma radiation only travels at most a few hundred meters, neutrinos shoot through the entire Earth as if it's empty space. Neutrinos need a lightyear of lead to stop half of them. They are able to leave the core of the sun in a straight line without ever bumping into a single nucleus.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 thanks for the clarification. I re-read my question and I'm amazed you understood what I was asking about. I wasn't very clear.
Haha! Thank you for your insight/summary! Here I’ve been stuck in a downward spiral trying to follow the rabbits. Reference to time stamp around 1:10:25
Funny I had that exact thought, around 29:00 was a beautiful conversation, two briliant people brain storming a theoretical way to transport anti-hydrogen. I love how naturally that conversation occured as a product of two genuis minds
Meeting of Great Minds is a precious gift to us the Audience. Thanks Bryan for your masterful ability to allow the main discussion never to go too far astray.
particles and antiparticles are opposite vibrations in a field. When the meet the two vibrations cancel each other out and energy is added back into the vacuum. Enough energy can create new vibrations. At the end of the day, only stable fields can continue to exist.
i may one day wrap my mind around the asymmetrical nature of this universe.. at what point in time when the cats eat enough of the anticats does matter self annihilate?
@@mscir yes, but I have to say that 'the average person' in this comment section is rather intelligent, at least interested in trying to understand complicated issues.
I watched this tonight, mind-blowing and brilliant. Also, now I understand how I always have loads of odd socks. This missing ones are travelling back in time. I should have looked for them before I lost them :)
I love how they share their expertise and knowledge. It's quite spectacular when such amazing people get together like this. I wish I were smarter. I wish I could close my eyes and focus hard enough to cause an avalanche of new neural connections and plasticity finding myself more perceptive and ingenious. Instead I just about forget everything that's important while the only things that stay fresh are my abilities to chew, poop, and tap screens.
You might find out Some of this knowledge may stay behind in memory. And it can be triggered someday in conversation. And suddenly you remember shit said here and look like a DAMN smart hooman
Step a. Put down the thingy you are busy tap tapping away on. The best way to retain memories we create is to slow the bombardment of constant info, especially since most of the info we tend to zone out on the deepest are the most interestingly bullshit stuff. Take notes...with actual pen and paper...deep, detailed notes, and study them daily. Add to them. Form your personal belief in what you are learning, make it mean more than just an interesting idea. Come up with arguments supporting your beliefs...then come up with arguments against them. Parse them deeply. At least, thats how I try and gain and retain knowledge.
It's really a brilliant discussion that I will love to watch again and again. The different perspectives to understand the grand design of this universe is something worthy listening and watching. Thank you Prof. Brian Greene and other eminent scientists in this video....
Nothing more to say about the whole discussion as already many comments has done... but the Graphic animation in the beginning with the music and Brian voice.. is just so amazingly Satisfying to watch.
I like what Neil has to say at the end about a new more efficient, more elegant understanding of physics and assert that it will be based on consciousness being fundamental and everything else emerging from it.
If these guys(&gals) are correct, this is a horrible world. Don't get me wrong, I love Physics. I'm currently reading Brian's book "The Elegant Universe", and find him to be a very sharp guy. Don't sell yourself or other average joes short when talking about beautiful minds. There is a whole other side to reality they refuse to address, and which some in this group dismiss outright with zero consideration.. You can be a deep thinker yourself, with ideas about reality that never even crossed the minds of those on the stage. Think about it.
@@Dude_Slick Would love to hear your opinion or commentary on this, especially the part they failed to address if you don't mind. I got zero knowledge on physics, but like to hear people talk about it.
one of the best presentations by the world science festival i've seen and i think i've watched them all. thank you brian and every one of these immensely talented people.
After listening to this panel speak ( calm, quiet. rational, respectful of each other, clear of thought, etc, etc ) it really makes you wonder what kind of a world we could live in if all of our, so-called, "leaders" were like these people. The idea that people like this could do a better job of running the world might be a concept that is too naive but I find it to be an interesting daydream. I qualify this in consideration that I used to think of Brian Greene as my hero in scientific thought until I heard some of his political jokes that exposed his sub-agenda ( we all know there is much more to jokes than meets the eye ). Who knows what is under the "sheep's clothing" with any particular individual but I sure did enjoy all of his guests here tonight. Neil Turok in particular seems to be an ideal human being. I think I have a new "hero".
Watch Real Genius. That's a great depiction of an ego-manical intellectual who gets a taste of power and runs with it. I think we ought to have psych exams for our leaders, because people who seek out power, especially via politics, have some pretty scary thoughts going on in there.
Hands down, I find Andre Linde the funniest man in Physics. Check any panel that includes him. He was great with Alan Guth and others on a multiverse WSF type discussion.
@Enter the Braggn' who is presenting never-ending mathematical speculation as the true and confirmed nature of our existence? even if they were, that'd be funny not sad. but no one's really doing that, are they?
As a layman, I’ve learned more from Brian Green about the ideas behind physics (a topic that screams complexity) than most other experts of less complex fields.
@@remotenetwork5034 no. I loved all but one of my professors - my university certainly isn’t a scam. My education in applied sciences & architecture is NOT a scam - it’s practical and applicable. So ... not buying your bizarre extremism - you may have had your own experiences, but part of me thinks you’re spewing none sense to justify your lack of education. thank you very much
One thing I hated about being in university is that when I asked a question to the science teacher, she only tells me four words and that’s it. Then leaves me still scratching my head.
@ *Deus X. Machina Animé* The oxymoron is that anti-matter should not be made of matter but of something that does not “exist” in the form of matter as we know it and can be affected by gravity... oh yea.. dark matter. Thats the true anti-matter. The “anti-matter” that they discuss is still regular matter but of opposing charge which annihilate.
اكتشاف الاكوان المنسوجه I have questions about the theory of woven universes The woven universes are connected together in the cosmic carpet But these woven universes are separate in time Because there are new universes because of spatial expansion 1-The first question is about the density of matter and energy in the universe How much energy and matter is there in the universe? 2-The second question is about the curvature of the universe Is it a zero curvature or positive curvature or negative curvature ??? 3-The third question about the extension of the place of the universe Is the extension of the universe final or has an infinite stretch? If we live in the Infinite Universe, this is evidence of the existence of the woven universes Please send my three questions to cosmologists .
I watched Feynman lectures before this and the whole time I was thinking positron is electron going backwards in time and there is your missing anti matter. Then Neil, sitting quiet the whole time, ends with just that idea. Nice.
Of the many wonderful discussions from the World Science Festival, this one is, in my opinion, one of the more entertaining, deep and understandable of them all. Great work as always. Thank you.
What a VERY fun group. Taught us a lot AND made us laugh. Would have loved to have heard the end of some of those side conversations. Excellent symposium on antimatter.
Hypertherticly if there was a room filled with the same stuff that's in space and it was connected to a room with oxygen and you opened the door the stuff in the vacuumed space would it be related to dark matter or just matter ¿?¿?
I’ve read some of his work and just the way he talks about these complex questions of the nature of our reality in such a simple way it’s almost like a children’s book.
@@paddymcdoogle6753 how about no? Don’t need to open your mouth typing. You’re the one replying cuz ur butt hurt over nothing? Not my fault you can’t understand there’s complicated things in this world. Talk about cringe.
@@fullsendcirca9255 I saw one of his descriptions .... " small writing on a pre-inflated balloon is comparable to quantum fluctuations before the big bang ; as inflation of the balloon creates big writing , similarly , the quantum fluctuations create the 'cosmic microwave Background' . The best bit is that scientists calculated differances in temperature in the pre-big bang quantum fluctuations and then , demonstrated the identical temperature differances throughout the CMB (in our universe).
Getting to the end of this video and seeing Neil Turok's model of the universe was weird as hell... As an uneducated worker, I got into physics a while ago. A little over a year ago, I learned that antimatter was just time reversed matter, and I spent several weeks contemplating this, and then further on the topic of this video: why the universe exists if antimatter and matter was created in equal. I literally came to the conclusion that the big bang must be symetrical in time, and began drawing a model exactly like that of Turok's... but I had never heard of that before. I honestly thought it was just my uneducated imagination going wild and really never took it seriously. But seeing this video now, that some theoretical physicist way smarter than I came to the same conclusion (I'm sure in much more detail), is really mind blowing. This is tripping me out.
Well, you're not the only one, Colin: I've also contemplated that very same notion since I learned a bit about Feynman's diagrams, which seems to be what is inspiring Turok after all. He's saying: we've tried to do it all over-complicated and it didn't work, why not go back to "the basics", and, if we do that, maybe it's all a bit simpler an we just can't experience (most of) the antimatter that there is because it is in the "wrong" time direction... somehow. I thinking of that: it can be all kinds of wrong, because my knowledge is way too limited. Some guy on the Internet (i.e. you) saying that: same thing or worse. But Neil Turok saying that, then it becomes authority and therefore quite plausible. Of course he can be wrong as well but at the very least he seems to know what he is talking about, so...
Amar Salih Šehić But without men like Neil Turok, we wouldn't be pushing the limits and possibilities of science. Without pushing the limits and possibilities of science, there can be no experiments. I say if one man has an exceptional ability in a particular area of study, let him work where he may yield the most value for everyone. Those whom are better with the stock market should work with the stock market. Those whom are exceptional fundraisers should be fundraisers. The most value we can get is when everyone does what they are best in rather than trying to fill needed roles with people who are mediocre or not as skilled in that area. Neil Turok is very much needed where he currently is in my opinion.
I agree. When he started getting into his explanation I was thinking oh my god, yes! I also have no physics education, and struggle to understand a lot of the things I'd like to because I don't possess the math to enable those revelations but, even though there are critical details of what I just heard that I can't now explain to someone else, it made an awful lot of sense to me. Not in a metaphysical sort of way or anything. Just in a sense that science seems to often have these build-ups of theory, eventually constructing this contraption resembling Rube-Goldberg's finest, until someone comes along, walks over, and just flips the switch on. Which I guess is pretty much what he was saying. I would almost certainly be an experimentalist if I were in physics, but there is this deep excitement for the development of theory too. I really have no place to even have an opinion on these things, but it's fascinating. I wonder about this stuff and really need to educate myself more deeply. Like, photons don't experience time. From their "perspective" they are born and die at precisely the same instant. Nevermind that we see them maybe 14 billion years after they formed. I wonder things like, does that relate to what he's saying here? Was there an epoch where none of the "stuff" experienced time, then god peeked in the box and poof, okay matter it is, -BANG-? Anyway, cool stuff.
Maybe the mechanism of the black box is the positrons converting into dark matter. I believe dark matter isn't a ghost particle sitting ON the spacetime fabric, but rather positron's converted energy imprinted INSIDE OF spacetime. I think dark matter is empty fixed energy fields creating gravity wells. Spacetime hit a yield point during inflation and somehow the broken symmetry and lost positrons created potential energy in a phase transition. This hypothesis solves two problems and supports the conservation of energy.
got a question. Is there any type of particle or field or force that can keep antimatter and matter separate from each other? or perhaps another dimension that is very partially permeable that would explain antimatter particles in bananas or accelerators?
As much as I appreciate staying on track, I do find the hypothetical antihydrogen conversations, the conversations where physicists minds wonder, even more fascinating. I think those conversations should be allowed to wonder a bit more.
@@jimwhitehead1532 Lmfao yeah, that is most likely the issue. It kills me though because education and innovation is stifled so much because of confidential and classified programs. When I attended school for advanced manufacturing (Precision Machining and CNC Automation) I got intrigued by radioactive machining and superalloy (nickel based) manufacturing methods and it's only ever really used in defense or aerospace applications, it's nearly impossible to learn about. From purely an educational standpoint, it is exceedingly frustrating, as a student that just wants to learn more. I'd love to work in research and development in some of those classified programs, I find physics and that level of chemistry/material science so fascinating!
@@kevin_delaney Remember the Dan Brown book and movie "Angels and Demons" about a stolen canister of antimatter that threatened the Vatican? They cut off discussion right away, to not help the bad guys. IMHO, read the book if you can. It is way better than the movie.
@@kevin_delaney You are welcome. I just started Andy Weir's new space novel "Hail Mary" which may be made into a movie in several years, like "The Martian" was.
The difficulty with going down this path is that gravity is a big unknown in particle physics. We simply don't have a solid model for gravity on a quantum level. And without a solid model, it's hard to build theories and by extension experiments. Your theory could well be correct, but so far our testing seems to show gravity affects matter and anti matter in the same way on a macroscopic scale.
Then does anti-matter have negative mass based gravety. If most of an atoms mass comes from neutrons, with no charge, could it be possible that neutrons are interchangeable between matter and anti-matter? As with no charge they should, in theory, be interchangeable. A corection may be needed, if possible, type below.
some one girl???????? who single Mather and where is coming from chil tell AS who is father you not me not but she plays games in the would who single Mather we asking history where is coming from
Ikr, its actualy great to Actualy be ablr to understand this kind of science without looking at equations that cause us depression on the fundamental level
@@kkevan4138 Is it possible for Anti-Atoms to make Anti-Elements? And then Anti-Molecules...Anti-Radiation and so on? É possível que os anti-átomos façam anti-elementos? E então Anti-Moléculas ... Anti-Radiação e assim por diante?
Same. If the anti-hydrogen is not charged, it can't be controlled with electric or magnetic fields. How else to hold it together and not let it touch any normal matter.
There is a fascinating elegance in observing how the caste of former storytellers, magicians, conjurers, sorcerers and necromancers have found a home in the new teaching - what we now call 'The Science'. With a grace that almost gives the appearance of believability, they are able to take us away from the triviality of our everyday thoughts. They strive to introduce us to the dazzling spheres of actual reality and to reveal their pulsating dance to us.
Wild guess: Is antimatter simply time-reversed normal matter? One theorem says they are mathematically identical. Also, Feynman diagrams predict brief time reversals in particle interactions. If so, then in the Big Bang, did half the energy as anti-matter go backwards in time, vanishing from our sight and did our matter go forward in time?
I am simply blown away by how someone with no formal science education, who dropped out of high school algebra thinking she would never understand it can, under the tutelage of these marvelous physicists, begin to comprehend these scientific principles. Thank you all. Just know that you are making this old lady delighted and grateful.
I mean... anyone could do that. Its literaly just using illustrations and animations that well... less intelligent people CAN comprehend. Unlike them, we never seen a proton before or a anti-neutron. They did. But we all have seen a dog before. So them comparing the anti-particles to dogs makes it more relatable to us qnd thus easier to understand. Like how you know the difference between a Circle, square and hexagon. But a todler does not. Until you show the difference and explain what this difference is. (The amount of corners) :)
@@cherrydragon3120 I'm impressed by your response, Cherry Dragon. I, too, am so happy to have these understandable explanations. I don't consider myself or you as "less intelligent," rather it's just a matter of never having learned certain terminology and maths at an early age. From what I've read, some of the major scientists who came up with foundational theories and hypotheses visualized them first and worked out the explanations later. Seems like that puts us right in there with the big guys. (smile)
I always get the feeling that at some point in experimental physics, in our effort to discover the true nature of the universe, somehow un-intuitively create a black swan event that wipes us out. I don’t believe it is likely to ever actually happen, but...
I think we are allowed by some Creator to comprehend so much of the nature of the universe at so much a time. Most of the advancements in science over the centuries has come about not from outright wrongs or complete errors but from highly accurate foundations which are simply limited in the scope of their application. Probably the best example of such is comparing Newton to Einstein. Newton's formulae to explain gravity are near perfect when describing macroscopic entities in motion but they fail when taking into account heavier masses and speeds. Newton's math was far more responsible than anyone else's advanced math for NASA getting men on the moon and back. Then Einstein comes along and corrects Newton's gravity math while also providing a better picture of gravity as being defined as the curving of spacetime by mass (and thus energy too). But now quantum mechanics comes along and says "Hold on you Einstein. Your gravity math doesn't work at my level". Unfortunately QM hasn't revealed the true nature of its gravity math (the elusive quantum gravity). Whoever figures this out will be the new Einstein, just as Einstein was the new Newton or Galileo if you prefer.
I love Marcela's manner of speaking. Never having studied physics, I get lost quickly. But I still want to understand what she's saying. I also like Dr Muriyama's manner of speaking but for a completely different reason.
What I find interesting is that these talks can be done all in English. It seems that geniuses all around the world pick up English along the way and I greatly appreciate it.
I would love to hear the debate and theories on the conversation concerning the movie "Angles And Demons" and antimatter. Writers and scientists are curious. IMO. The moderator was instructed to move on, away from this narrative.
And here I thought you might have had an insight of some kind, possibly concerning dark matter. Guess you fall under the category of doesn't matter...... Oh well, we can;t all be physicists. some of us have to be failed comedians.
The positives and negatives don't cancel each other out actually they can coexist together in an endless dance of interweaving motion around each other like two opposite magnets.
Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.
Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.
Ya sleeping through a free education is the best way to learn especially if you have a physics text book under your pillow as your brain will absorb knowledge from a high concentration to a severely low concentrate
On a 1-10 scale, I'd give that around a 13. :) Between the pure information on one level, the charming nature of those delivering it, the excellent, really helpful metaphors and analogies, and the thankfully in-depth look at the different subject matter -- that was just great, helpful, and highly entertaining. And what more can you ask for, really?
??????????? Do u mean one of speakers looks like Mickey rourke? Just coz of his glasses? I'm bending my brain to try to see what you're talking abput more than the content lol
but why would you assume there should have been born equal amounts of both matter and antimatter? how on earth could you possibly say that without even knowing what kind of event led to the birth of the universe?
The oxymoron is that anti-matter should not be made of matter but of something that does not “exist” in the form of matter as we know it and can be affected by gravity... oh yea.. dark matter. Thats the true anti-matter. The “anti-matter” that they discuss is still regular matter but of opposing charge which annihilate.
Most wonderful presentation of a fundamental questions . Extremely confusing and controversial questions by the best knowledgeable people. Good job Brian Greene. The discussion may be outside your mathematical grasp, but it is most enlightening for all uninitiated. George Paul, AB.,BSc., UC Berkeley, M.D. UCSF, 1968..
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Brian Green once again at his best. One hearing is not enough so I play and replay and replay to get a clear picture. Feel so blessed to world science
I agree.. the curiosity that these videos produce in me is great. You have to keep asking questions.. thus, you have to WANT to keep asking questions
Neil Turok has very simple approach towards physics, that even reflects in his lectures. I watched many lectures of him on youtube and never saw anyone like him to explain things so simply and easily.
Agree. He was captivating
I enjoyed watching these interviews. Loved the humor and the breaking it down descriptive way for those of us not familiar with most of these things. Greatly appreciated this. Thank you. Am looking forward to more.
I think Brian Greene as a host/moderator is amazing as he makes sure the conversation flows in terms of the what the audience can digest. Thank you Brian.
I agree
Agreed love listening to the man talk same also goes for neil tyson
I think Brian Greene is an annoying moderator...has a whiney voice that distracts from the content
@fiendin281 lol you think that wasnt on purpose?. Obviously he noticed they were giving too much info that they dont want certain ppl to know for certain reasons ;)
@@ssgssbeet4133 Might mean capturing them is actually more simple than they thought. Or way to complex for time in the talk. Either is possible.
These talks are exactly what Internet has served humanity with. Thank you for making them available
V8
@@oipbhakeld Twin-turbo inline-six.
And to keep balance for every highly educational video out on the internet. There are 10 stupid video's and another 30 comedic ones
yeah this and conspiracy videos that are tearing the world apart
Brian Greene is a damn good host! He knows exactly how to guide the discussion and just when to interject for the audience. He's like human Alexa!
I personally wanted to hear how large amounts of antimatter could be contained but he interjected and prevented that from being in the video. Me not like that.
@@edwood6015 it's good for the majority though. That requires individuals to let go of certain stuff, but overall, everyone is happy.
I used to read Elegant Universe in between taking tickets at Carousel Cinemas as comgr b4 9/11 when KSM Al Qaeda cell would come thru on weekends for black movies.
@@edwood6015 I thought the exact same thing, kinda odd that he cut them off. I get that he needs to keep the discussion on topic, but 30 seconds more wouldn't have killed him, and it was fascinating listening to them go back and forth.
van@@danieltakacs8222 I denk deze denk Jeffrey je Jeffrey en dansmet met is dde van een oog doel de dje mobiele nummer is dat
What a privilege to be able to watch - even two years late - some of the most brilliant scientists in their fields in lively conversation on such an interesting topic. And with Brian Greene as the moderator who always puts things in perspective for laypeople. Thank you all.
The ri lectures
S v deer get re
C M it’s use in medical imaging was given as just one example in the video if that was a legitimate question, and not just typical religious ignorance
@C M they help in way more ways then your invisible man in the sky intended them to be for mankind.
@@cherrydragon3120 don't encourage him by giving him attention. Remember if they act like a spoiled child you should treat them as such and ignore them
I absolutly LOVED seeing them geek out with eacher - the banter was hilarious and intellegent - it was brilliant🤤
What’s so *ucking brilliant about that? They laugh like idiots not even trying to explain anything; what a waste of time and money
These guys make they're professions and studies seem so easy and speak almost like they're just having an every day conversation (I realize it is for them).
Totally. And imagine just how well you would have to understand something to be able to make it comprehensible to the "rest of us." That's a REALLY impressive skill, if you think about it. Wow.
It's really beautiful to see intelligent people have such a humorous and informative conversation about a complicated subject. Really enjoyable!
I thought the same thing
@Nemesis Explain how does one perceive an intelligent individual? I thought that all of the speakers here were highly intelligent with different views on certain subjects.
ppl exist who only come here to feel intelligent. no joking.
@Nemesis If you're an astrophysicist or a particle physicist then you're highly intelligent. Universities don't give science degrees and PHDs away.
Making advances in science requires intelligent, creative and logical thinking.
There's science behind physics theories - foundations in physics and maths. It's not guesswork. Scientists are constantly challenged by other scientists to prove their findings.
A theory needs to be peer reviewed before it can even be published in a scientific journal.
@Igor Mateus I disagree with your idea that intelligence should be quantified by the ability to create knowledge. I believe intelligence should be defined by one's understanding of that knowledge.
These videos are epic. Finally some content I can binge watch.
Would I be someone if it was up to me on what to do with Saturn?
@@cayosalgado1226 i agree i think
Amen
This has got to be the best one so far. Could follow along with 90% of the discussion thanks to all the analogies and slides. Got a little lost during the neutrino talk, they set up how hard it is to catch and detect and it being electrically neutral but then at the end they said they just gonna shoot it 1000kms and split it with a magnet... Im guessing their is some explanation that was too hard to communicate in a discussion like this
All the particles that are not electrically neutral are removed from the beam leaving only the neutrinos. Or reverse the magnet so you get anti matter and when it decays neutrinos are in your decay product.
@@benjaminbeard3736 All the charged particles are stopped by the rocks the beam travels through. Where even gamma radiation only travels at most a few hundred meters, neutrinos shoot through the entire Earth as if it's empty space. Neutrinos need a lightyear of lead to stop half of them. They are able to leave the core of the sun in a straight line without ever bumping into a single nucleus.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 thanks for the clarification. I re-read my question and I'm amazed you understood what I was asking about. I wasn't very clear.
@@benjaminbeard3736thanks
Haha! Thank you for your insight/summary! Here I’ve been stuck in a downward spiral trying to follow the rabbits. Reference to time stamp around 1:10:25
Scientists and artists are so much alike. They both put 100% of passion and dedication into their work.
Funny I had that exact thought, around 29:00 was a beautiful conversation, two briliant people brain storming a theoretical way to transport anti-hydrogen. I love how naturally that conversation occured as a product of two genuis minds
Meeting of Great Minds is a precious gift to us the Audience. Thanks Bryan for your masterful ability to allow the main discussion never to go too far astray.
particles and antiparticles are opposite vibrations in a field. When the meet the two vibrations cancel each other out and energy is added back into the vacuum. Enough energy can create new vibrations. At the end of the day, only stable fields can continue to exist.
i may one day wrap my mind around the asymmetrical nature of this universe..
at what point in time when the cats eat enough of the anticats does matter self annihilate?
It's 4 AM I'm heading to work and this is probably the clearest explanation in fewest words I've heard yet.
I love Brian. He makes complex concepts in Physics make me follow even though I am not trained in Physics. Very enjoyable and delightful discussions.
Agreed, he's really good at explaining it in a way an average person can understand it, to me that shows that he understands it very well.
@@mscir yes, but I have to say that 'the average person' in this comment section is rather intelligent, at least interested in trying to understand complicated issues.
@Mike S Not trained in Physics ? This is why you think you understand
I watched this tonight, mind-blowing and brilliant.
Also, now I understand how I always have loads of odd socks. This missing ones are travelling back in time. I should have looked for them before I lost them :)
LOL!
.
you'll be mindblown once you see pairs of socks spontaneously appearing. Probably the wrong size too.
I love how they share their expertise and knowledge. It's quite spectacular when such amazing people get together like this. I wish I were smarter. I wish I could close my eyes and focus hard enough to cause an avalanche of new neural connections and plasticity finding myself more perceptive and ingenious. Instead I just about forget everything that's important while the only things that stay fresh are my abilities to chew, poop, and tap screens.
On the bright side, you can still chew and poop.
You might find out Some of this knowledge may stay behind in memory. And it can be triggered someday in conversation.
And suddenly you remember shit said here and look like a DAMN smart hooman
I also can chew poop while tapping screens
Step a. Put down the thingy you are busy tap tapping away on. The best way to retain memories we create is to slow the bombardment of constant info, especially since most of the info we tend to zone out on the deepest are the most interestingly bullshit stuff. Take notes...with actual pen and paper...deep, detailed notes, and study them daily. Add to them. Form your personal belief in what you are learning, make it mean more than just an interesting idea. Come up with arguments supporting your beliefs...then come up with arguments against them. Parse them deeply. At least, thats how I try and gain and retain knowledge.
It's really a brilliant discussion that I will love to watch again and again.
The different perspectives to understand the grand design of this universe is something worthy listening and watching.
Thank you Prof. Brian Greene and other eminent scientists in this video....
Nothing more to say about the whole discussion as already many comments has done...
but the Graphic animation in the beginning with the music and Brian voice.. is just so amazingly Satisfying to watch.
I like what Neil has to say at the end about a new more efficient, more elegant understanding of physics and assert that it will be based on consciousness being fundamental and everything else emerging from it.
4455
I was challenged to study more especially on the fronti
What a wonderful world we live in with beautiful minds like these.
^ not all minds are quite so beautiful lol
If these guys(&gals) are correct, this is a horrible world. Don't get me wrong, I love Physics. I'm currently reading Brian's book "The Elegant Universe", and find him to be a very sharp guy. Don't sell yourself or other average joes short when talking about beautiful minds. There is a whole other side to reality they refuse to address, and which some in this group dismiss outright with zero consideration.. You can be a deep thinker yourself, with ideas about reality that never even crossed the minds of those on the stage. Think about it.
their minds are great mine well is brutish.
all praise to god the almighty creator who created this
@@Dude_Slick Would love to hear your opinion or commentary on this, especially the part they failed to address if you don't mind. I got zero knowledge on physics, but like to hear people talk about it.
I'm convinced in the next decade Neil Turok will be proven right. Nature, in its beauty always seems to use the most elegant and simplest solutions.
one of the best presentations by the world science festival i've seen and i think i've watched them all. thank you brian and every one of these immensely talented people.
Brian Greene is awesome. Don't know physics, never studied it..but I love hearing these talks
If you have put a battery into anything to create a circuit you've encountered and thus know physics
@@aurelias9539 love your answer. Beautiful
After listening to this panel speak ( calm, quiet. rational, respectful of each other, clear of thought, etc, etc ) it really makes you wonder what kind of a world we could live in if all of our, so-called, "leaders" were like these people. The idea that people like this could do a better job of running the world might be a concept that is too naive but I find it to be an interesting daydream. I qualify this in consideration that I used to think of Brian Greene as my hero in scientific thought until I heard some of his political jokes that exposed his sub-agenda ( we all know there is much more to jokes than meets the eye ). Who knows what is under the "sheep's clothing" with any particular individual but I sure did enjoy all of his guests here tonight. Neil Turok in particular seems to be an ideal human being. I think I have a new "hero".
⁰8
IKR. But scientists can be/are also power maniacal and exploitative. But the ideal is beautiful.
Our govt should be run by a PANEL of people who’s terms are staggered. Get rid of this idiotic 2-3 party system that divides people.
Watch Real Genius. That's a great depiction of an ego-manical intellectual who gets a taste of power and runs with it. I think we ought to have psych exams for our leaders, because people who seek out power, especially via politics, have some pretty scary thoughts going on in there.
I agree with you completely. Unfortunately the political ‘animal’ seems to be more Machiavellian…..
I have never smiled or laughed this much while listening to a science discussion. This has got to be one of my favorite videos ever!
I smiled because of the jokes they cracked during the discussion
I agree. Marcela especially was a delight though they were all obviously having fun. Makes the topic easier to watch.
Hands down, I find Andre Linde the funniest man in Physics. Check any panel that includes him. He was great with Alan Guth and others on a multiverse WSF type discussion.
@Enter the Braggn' No, it's not.
@Enter the Braggn' who is presenting never-ending mathematical speculation as the true and confirmed nature of our existence? even if they were, that'd be funny not sad. but no one's really doing that, are they?
I feel so lucky to spend my rainy day watching these excellent discussions about the World.
class footage bro
i AGREE .... i EVEN PUT ON A PHYSICS VIDEO AT A LOW VOLUME TO GO TO SLEEP BY....
You reckon it was an antirainyday.?.
You are definitely Living The Good Life. Smiley face!
me too!
I am a software developer but these physicians really make the thing understandable... Thank you guys.
As a layman, I’ve learned more from Brian Green about the ideas behind physics (a topic that screams complexity) than most other experts of less complex fields.
Yah but yah it
Yah but
The theory near the end, of the identical U and U(bar) universes was mindblowing... new idea for me to churn around in my head.
Pandemic lockdown... I think I’m learning more about science through these world class speakers than my entire university student days! ✨🏆✨💕😛
when you realize your University is a scam to put you in, indentured servitude
@@remotenetwork5034 no. I loved all but one of my professors - my university certainly isn’t a scam. My education in applied sciences & architecture is NOT a scam - it’s practical and applicable.
So ... not buying your bizarre extremism - you may have had your own experiences, but part of me thinks you’re spewing none sense to justify your lack of education.
thank you very much
Does it matter or does anti-matter matter?
The whole year of school has been suspended.
One thing I hated about being in university is that when I asked a question to the science teacher, she only tells me four words and that’s it. Then leaves me still scratching my head.
@ *Deus X. Machina Animé*
The oxymoron is that anti-matter should not be made of matter but of something that does not “exist” in the form of matter as we know it and can be affected by gravity... oh yea.. dark matter. Thats the true anti-matter. The “anti-matter” that they discuss is still regular matter but of opposing charge which annihilate.
اكتشاف الاكوان المنسوجه
I have questions about the theory of woven universes
The woven universes are connected together in the cosmic carpet
But these woven universes are separate in time
Because there are new universes because of spatial expansion
1-The first question is about the density of matter and energy in the universe
How much energy and matter is there in the universe?
2-The second question is about the curvature of the universe
Is it a zero curvature or positive curvature or negative curvature ???
3-The third question about the extension of the place of the universe
Is the extension of the universe final or has an infinite stretch?
If we live in the Infinite Universe, this is evidence of the existence of the woven universes
Please send my three questions to cosmologists
.
I think you are talking about string theory?
There are places like Cosmic Queries Star Talk or Sam Harris Ask Me Anything, you can send in questions.
I watched Feynman lectures before this and the whole time I was thinking positron is electron going backwards in time and there is your missing anti matter. Then Neil, sitting quiet the whole time, ends with just that idea. Nice.
crush537 getuar
Ye it's a historical artifact and mostly a joke.
What a precise work the projector operators are doing!
Of the many wonderful discussions from the World Science Festival, this one is, in my opinion, one of the more entertaining, deep and understandable of them all. Great work as always. Thank you.
What a VERY fun group. Taught us a lot AND made us laugh. Would have loved to have heard the end of some of those side conversations. Excellent symposium on antimatter.
34:35 I thought those "P" meant Planets lol No Wonder we are left with One Planet out of other billions of Planets that can sustain life.
P
Hypertherticly if there was a room filled with the same stuff that's in space and it was connected to a room with oxygen and you opened the door the stuff in the vacuumed space would it be related to dark matter or just matter ¿?¿?
I'm spending my covid 19 isolation rewatching my favorite WSF videos. As I read the comments I see that I'm not the only one.
Michal Reeser:Millions of universes, so I don.t thik U r the only one, me3!
I’m doing the same! Happy educating!
Yea, no shit
Good luck 🍀
Bruh im commenting just to remind you to rewatch it again
I’ve read some of his work and just the way he talks about these complex questions of the nature of our reality in such a simple way it’s almost like a children’s book.
Because, why make things complex? The more humble you are, the 'less is more'.
@@paddymcdoogle6753 you misunderstood what I said. I’m saying he makes complicated subjects sound so simple because hes that knowledgeable….got it?
@@fullsendcirca9255 Why don't you shut your mouth up? Got it? Cringe.
@@paddymcdoogle6753 how about no? Don’t need to open your mouth typing. You’re the one replying cuz ur butt hurt over nothing? Not my fault you can’t understand there’s complicated things in this world. Talk about cringe.
@@fullsendcirca9255 I saw one of his descriptions .... " small writing on a pre-inflated balloon is comparable to quantum fluctuations before the big bang ; as inflation of the balloon creates big writing , similarly , the quantum fluctuations create the 'cosmic microwave Background' . The best bit is that scientists calculated differances in temperature in the pre-big bang quantum fluctuations and then , demonstrated the identical temperature differances throughout the CMB (in our universe).
The best thing about lockdown is these amazing videos
I've learned so much
Getting to the end of this video and seeing Neil Turok's model of the universe was weird as hell... As an uneducated worker, I got into physics a while ago. A little over a year ago, I learned that antimatter was just time reversed matter, and I spent several weeks contemplating this, and then further on the topic of this video: why the universe exists if antimatter and matter was created in equal. I literally came to the conclusion that the big bang must be symetrical in time, and began drawing a model exactly like that of Turok's... but I had never heard of that before. I honestly thought it was just my uneducated imagination going wild and really never took it seriously. But seeing this video now, that some theoretical physicist way smarter than I came to the same conclusion (I'm sure in much more detail), is really mind blowing. This is tripping me out.
Well, you're not the only one, Colin: I've also contemplated that very same notion since I learned a bit about Feynman's diagrams, which seems to be what is inspiring Turok after all. He's saying: we've tried to do it all over-complicated and it didn't work, why not go back to "the basics", and, if we do that, maybe it's all a bit simpler an we just can't experience (most of) the antimatter that there is because it is in the "wrong" time direction... somehow.
I thinking of that: it can be all kinds of wrong, because my knowledge is way too limited. Some guy on the Internet (i.e. you) saying that: same thing or worse. But Neil Turok saying that, then it becomes authority and therefore quite plausible. Of course he can be wrong as well but at the very least he seems to know what he is talking about, so...
Amar Salih Šehić But without men like Neil Turok, we wouldn't be pushing the limits and possibilities of science. Without pushing the limits and possibilities of science, there can be no experiments. I say if one man has an exceptional ability in a particular area of study, let him work where he may yield the most value for everyone. Those whom are better with the stock market should work with the stock market. Those whom are exceptional fundraisers should be fundraisers. The most value we can get is when everyone does what they are best in rather than trying to fill needed roles with people who are mediocre or not as skilled in that area. Neil Turok is very much needed where he currently is in my opinion.
I agree. When he started getting into his explanation I was thinking oh my god, yes! I also have no physics education, and struggle to understand a lot of the things I'd like to because I don't possess the math to enable those revelations but, even though there are critical details of what I just heard that I can't now explain to someone else, it made an awful lot of sense to me. Not in a metaphysical sort of way or anything. Just in a sense that science seems to often have these build-ups of theory, eventually constructing this contraption resembling Rube-Goldberg's finest, until someone comes along, walks over, and just flips the switch on. Which I guess is pretty much what he was saying. I would almost certainly be an experimentalist if I were in physics, but there is this deep excitement for the development of theory too.
I really have no place to even have an opinion on these things, but it's fascinating. I wonder about this stuff and really need to educate myself more deeply. Like, photons don't experience time. From their "perspective" they are born and die at precisely the same instant. Nevermind that we see them maybe 14 billion years after they formed. I wonder things like, does that relate to what he's saying here? Was there an epoch where none of the "stuff" experienced time, then god peeked in the box and poof, okay matter it is, -BANG-? Anyway, cool stuff.
Maybe the mechanism of the black box is the positrons converting into dark matter. I believe dark matter isn't a ghost particle sitting ON the spacetime fabric, but rather positron's converted energy imprinted INSIDE OF spacetime. I think dark matter is empty fixed energy fields creating gravity wells. Spacetime hit a yield point during inflation and somehow the broken symmetry and lost positrons created potential energy in a phase transition. This hypothesis solves two problems and supports the conservation of energy.
It's by far the most likely of the explanations talked about in this video.
I have no idea what’s going on but I enjoy their company :)
got a question.
Is there any type of particle or field or force that can keep antimatter and matter separate from each other? or perhaps another dimension that is very partially permeable that would explain antimatter particles in bananas or accelerators?
Brian Greene is magical. Everyone on this stage is truly inspiring, I loved every minute
As much as I appreciate staying on track, I do find the hypothetical antihydrogen conversations, the conversations where physicists minds wonder, even more fascinating. I think those conversations should be allowed to wonder a bit more.
Another take: they didn't want to publicly discuss an area of current highly classified research.
@@jimwhitehead1532 Lmfao yeah, that is most likely the issue. It kills me though because education and innovation is stifled so much because of confidential and classified programs. When I attended school for advanced manufacturing (Precision Machining and CNC Automation) I got intrigued by radioactive machining and superalloy (nickel based) manufacturing methods and it's only ever really used in defense or aerospace applications, it's nearly impossible to learn about. From purely an educational standpoint, it is exceedingly frustrating, as a student that just wants to learn more. I'd love to work in research and development in some of those classified programs, I find physics and that level of chemistry/material science so fascinating!
@@kevin_delaney Remember the Dan Brown book and movie "Angels and Demons" about a stolen canister of antimatter that threatened the Vatican? They cut off discussion right away, to not help the bad guys. IMHO, read the book if you can. It is way better than the movie.
@@jimwhitehead1532 Hmm, I will, I've been meaning to anyway, thank you.
@@kevin_delaney You are welcome. I just started Andy Weir's new space novel "Hail Mary" which may be made into a movie in several years, like "The Martian" was.
Thank you! This is so fascinating. I am an outsider to this field, but everything was explained so well, made very easy to understand. Thank you!
What if antimatter reacts the opposite to gravity so it makes things anti move away from things of large positive mass. Does that make sense???
It's something they are trying to test. Most theories fall on the regular-gravity side, though.
The difficulty with going down this path is that gravity is a big unknown in particle physics. We simply don't have a solid model for gravity on a quantum level. And without a solid model, it's hard to build theories and by extension experiments.
Your theory could well be correct, but so far our testing seems to show gravity affects matter and anti matter in the same way on a macroscopic scale.
Then does anti-matter have negative mass based gravety. If most of an atoms mass comes from neutrons, with no charge, could it be possible that neutrons are interchangeable between matter and anti-matter?
As with no charge they should, in theory, be interchangeable.
A corection may be needed, if possible, type below.
Gravity is a weak force, and wouldn't really affect objects far away.
Anti-matter has normal gravity.
Brian you have no doubt given me a huge expanding interest in physica
some one girl???????? who single Mather and where is coming from chil tell AS who is father you not me not but she plays games in the would who single Mather we asking history where is coming from
@@oma2635 Wat?
Buddy this here World Science Festival content is fire! Excellent stuff, please keep it coming!
Thank you all so much for translating cutting edge knowledge in terms that we can tackle.
Ikr, its actualy great to Actualy be ablr to understand this kind of science without looking at equations that cause us depression on the fundamental level
So it's 2019, a year after this talk. What's the state of knowledge of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos?
the neutrinos haven't learned a thing, the antis, I don't know..
Maybe they are marojana fermions. Maybe not.
Neil Turok is right on. He's not trying to be a comedian, just doing what he gets paid for.
Thank you WSF!!!
I literally wait all year for this.
Is it possible for Anti-Atoms to make Anti-Elements? And then Anti-Molecules...Anti-Radiation and so on?
@@kkevan4138 Is it possible for Anti-Atoms to make Anti-Elements? And then Anti-Molecules...Anti-Radiation and so on?
É possível que os anti-átomos façam anti-elementos? E então Anti-Moléculas ... Anti-Radiação e assim por diante?
@@osvaldoires8071 exactly
I was a little bummed when Brian cut off the Angels and Demons debate about the ability to contain anti-hydrogen.
Well... my fuse blew too!
Same. If the anti-hydrogen is not charged, it can't be controlled with electric or magnetic fields. How else to hold it together and not let it touch any normal matter.
lol .. and we have the same initials
Be careful. You might be on a watchlist now.
@@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself You got that wrong! Its charged but with opposite charge! You will need an anti-magnetic field which dont exist!
There is a fascinating elegance in observing how the
caste of former storytellers, magicians, conjurers,
sorcerers and necromancers have found a home
in the new teaching - what we now call 'The Science'.
With a grace that almost gives the appearance of
believability, they are able to take us away from
the triviality of our everyday thoughts.
They strive to introduce us to the dazzling spheres
of actual reality and to reveal their pulsating
dance to us.
I can listen to this for hours and understand it for seconds
Ih
Uncles Luke and Bob, no aunts living, Cousins, Steve, Nathan and Natalie, Siblings Geoffrey, Marcus and Ellesania, both parents deceased.
Want more?)
😂nicely put and I relate entirely
Wild guess: Is antimatter simply time-reversed normal matter? One theorem says they are mathematically identical. Also, Feynman diagrams predict brief time reversals in particle interactions. If so, then in the Big Bang, did half the energy as anti-matter go backwards in time, vanishing from our sight and did our matter go forward in time?
A great question
1:28:00
In others dimensions
Please stop, that makes my head hurt.
That spliff done been smoked.
I am simply blown away by how someone with no formal science education, who dropped out of high school algebra thinking she would never understand it can, under the tutelage of these marvelous physicists, begin to comprehend these scientific principles. Thank you all. Just know that you are making this old lady delighted and grateful.
I mean... anyone could do that. Its literaly just using illustrations and animations that well... less intelligent people CAN comprehend.
Unlike them, we never seen a proton before or a anti-neutron.
They did. But we all have seen a dog before. So them comparing the anti-particles to dogs makes it more relatable to us qnd thus easier to understand.
Like how you know the difference between a Circle, square and hexagon.
But a todler does not. Until you show the difference and explain what this difference is. (The amount of corners)
:)
@@cherrydragon3120 I'm impressed by your response, Cherry Dragon. I, too, am so happy to have these understandable explanations. I don't consider myself or you as "less intelligent," rather it's just a matter of never having learned certain terminology and maths at an early age. From what I've read, some of the major scientists who came up with foundational theories and hypotheses visualized them first and worked out the explanations later. Seems like that puts us right in there with the big guys. (smile)
I always get the feeling that at some point in experimental physics, in our effort to discover the true nature of the universe, somehow un-intuitively create a black swan event that wipes us out.
I don’t believe it is likely to ever actually happen, but...
But what if the universe itself has an anti universe and theres a copy of us seperated by a thin veil
I think we are allowed by some Creator to comprehend so much of the nature of the universe at so much a time. Most of the advancements in science over the centuries has come about not from outright wrongs or complete errors but from highly accurate foundations which are simply limited in the scope of their application. Probably the best example of such is comparing Newton to Einstein. Newton's formulae to explain gravity are near perfect when describing macroscopic entities in motion but they fail when taking into account heavier masses and speeds. Newton's math was far more responsible than anyone else's advanced math for NASA getting men on the moon and back. Then Einstein comes along and corrects Newton's gravity math while also providing a better picture of gravity as being defined as the curving of spacetime by mass (and thus energy too). But now quantum mechanics comes along and says "Hold on you Einstein. Your gravity math doesn't work at my level". Unfortunately QM hasn't revealed the true nature of its gravity math (the elusive quantum gravity). Whoever figures this out will be the new Einstein, just as Einstein was the new Newton or Galileo if you prefer.
What a fantastic discussion, amazing speakers. Very well done 👍🏼
When matter and antimatter annihilate into energy, what type of energy? Where does it go? Does it just float in space?
Such an inspiring conversation. Thank you so much.
your very pretty
they're all amazing but i must say Marcela Carena blew my mind
Inès Mercier there’s something strange about cern .... and her link about the movie she talk about....
@@elmalito79 could you tell what?
Carlos Valencia what do you mean? Please elaborate, I’m interested in what you are saying.
I love Marcela's manner of speaking. Never having studied physics, I get lost quickly. But I still want to understand what she's saying.
I also like Dr Muriyama's manner of speaking but for a completely different reason.
she blew my brain
Thank you for no commercials ....
What I find interesting is that these talks can be done all in English. It seems that geniuses all around the world pick up English along the way and I greatly appreciate it.
Gotta love having gone through imperialism in the past.
I would love to hear the debate and theories on the conversation concerning the movie "Angles And Demons" and antimatter. Writers and scientists are curious. IMO. The moderator was instructed to move on, away from this narrative.
Not everything is a fucking conspiracy, good lord.
In the symmetric universe which goes backward in time, does entropy decrease? Probably no, correct?
I love how Greene monitors this group of scientists “nerding out” on over anti-matter. It’s endearing as well as fascinating.
1:20.00 is when all the fruitless nerding out gets called out. its literally time to go in a different direction
Wonder what surfing on an anti-RUclips would be like [or not like]...
No pun intended
Brian is my hero for caring about ideas for us, the lay folk
And I love how the Japanese dude is just wearing a short sleeve shirt. Super chill and nerdy.
ouch, 29:00 those two were arguing and Brian Greene smartly set the conversation on course.
Yeah out of vatican 😂
There are fact three kinds of matter, Anti-matter, Matter, and Doesn't matter, the last one has no use what so ever.
It does! It produces free time!
Oh...
@@bobbyatman273 Free time for us to enjoy, no matter what!
And here I thought you might have had an insight of some kind, possibly concerning dark matter. Guess you fall under the category of doesn't matter...... Oh well, we can;t all be physicists. some of us have to be failed comedians.
@@mephistounderwood4917 Of course! It is much better to laugh. Don't you agree?
This Michael keeps saying “It’s Easy…” like he’s craving to be honored as an advanced physicist.
The positives and negatives don't cancel each other out actually they can coexist together in an endless dance of interweaving motion around each other like two opposite magnets.
Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.
Correct...and that's how an atom works....that is not what they're talking about here though....this talk is about a "thing" and an "anti-thing" .... completely different than a positive and a negative.
Thanks..now I can sleep while listening to the discussion
saurabh28k Even me too
i thought i was the only one, such as relief
@@Amar061 Me too, or me four!! I half asleep and wake up with them on, it is illusory.
Me six
Ya sleeping through a free education is the best way to learn especially if you have a physics text book under your pillow as your brain will absorb knowledge from a high concentration to a severely low concentrate
11:00 - Thank you for your analogy describing sheet music and musicians / theoretical equations and physicists.
*_TRUST !!_*
I love how Brian Greene talks.
Thanks Brian Greene for all these discussions!
Please could you explain why we are not at risk in any way by using the collider. The black hole risk etc . Thank you
Hell yeah Neil Turok!
On a 1-10 scale, I'd give that around a 13. :) Between the pure information on one level, the charming nature of those delivering it, the excellent, really helpful metaphors and analogies, and the thankfully in-depth look at the different subject matter -- that was just great, helpful, and highly entertaining. And what more can you ask for, really?
The guy in the middle reminds me of Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner, which might take this to a 14/10.
Superb discussion and very well hosted.
Good to see Mickey Rourke from Sin City talking about matter antimatter particles
??????????? Do u mean one of speakers looks like Mickey rourke? Just coz of his glasses? I'm bending my brain to try to see what you're talking abput more than the content lol
thanks for great discussion. WSF rocks.
but why would you assume there should have been born equal amounts of both matter and antimatter? how on earth could you possibly say that without even knowing what kind of event led to the birth of the universe?
Thank You . This session was very inspiring .
Ted
Watching all Brian Greene’s videos during coronavirus confinement time.
The oxymoron is that anti-matter should not be made of matter but of something that does not “exist” in the form of matter as we know it and can be affected by gravity... oh yea.. dark matter. Thats the true anti-matter. The “anti-matter” that they discuss is still regular matter but of opposing charge which annihilate.
This was hella interesting and informative opened my eyes up to some things
Thanks to Brian (and others like Michio and Neil DeGrasse) who made me love science and also understand it as a common mortal
I have been watching this presentation time and again. It is well narated and informative. Thank you for sharing.
How was this Live 2018 when I've seen this years ago?
You slipped to our universe which is little slower than where you're from
Fascinating, and what progress has been made with regards toward creating gravity and anti gravity , So perhaps, there parallel worlds…
you obviously didnt make it to 1.20.00. at that point its stated blankly that for decades, theres been NO progress.
Most wonderful presentation of a fundamental questions . Extremely confusing and controversial questions by the best knowledgeable people. Good job Brian Greene. The discussion may be outside your mathematical grasp, but it is most enlightening for all uninitiated. George Paul, AB.,BSc., UC Berkeley, M.D. UCSF, 1968..
This talk is wonderful .👌
I thought she was going to say, “The neat thing about this detector is that it’s a banana” Lol 😂
great panel please have them together one a year for ongoing updates.
thankyou for this !
i can listen to this for hours , it is just wonderful