@@troublesafoot7836 it's always been the way. There was a put in the 1970's to lower the consent in Germany and the US to 12. It was blocked by feminist groups. Very little opposition from others. Women are the last line of defence for children.
Google Iran's "Ambassadors of Kindness". These are handmaidens of the patriarchy, and who the "Aunts" in the handmaid's tale were based on. These women are more than happy to sell out the rights and safety of other women and girls providing they get their pat on the head, and their own special privileges to lord over other women. Vile sort.
Always women defending men participating in women’s sport, we always have to be kind, and ignore facts. Do these people seriously believe those two athletes are women? They know that those men have DSD. This is just disingenuous.
It is willful ignorance on their part which is an affront to women and girls the world over who are wanting to participate in safe and fair competition.
Yes, but I ask why doesn't someone there state this fact? I am sick of this denegration of Women & Girls, in favour of men who pretend they are the opposite sex 🙄
Are those milaydees suddenly bereft of the ability to comprehend what is going on out in the world when they enter the elites by way of inheritance or political back slapping. The IOC and some of its members has not been free of corruption allegations over its years, and I'd bet there's some shenanigans behind the scenes that would make DelBoy and Arthur Daley flush with shock
I did not realise the depth of ignorance and complete absence of care that is clearly entrenched in our law makers. They are totally ignorant of the firmly established science here and have no intention of learning anything about it. The fact is that no genetic male should ever be allowed to intrude in the sport or safe spaces of genetic females, and the law makers are unable to provide any reason why they should. The failure of the law makers to even find out the facts shows them to be unfit for purpose. Shame on them. They have forfeited any moral rights to be custodians of the rights of our women and girls. This MUST be stopped.
I totally agree with you. This is due in my opinion to the fears advocacy campaigns by ngos who advocate on behalf of transgender people & those who give political donations to parties & individual politicians. The gov is captured by ngos and their idiollogies. These ngos distort facts to suit their needs (just like any private studies) and I have no doubt that some also engage in giving political donations in secret & as individuals as to not raise any suspicions. I do realise that a lot of this is pure speculation & rumours. However, how else can we explain how suddenly transgender women (biological men xy) are concidered to be exactly equal to women (biological human adult female Xx) by just claiming to be a women. How & why has this become fact when everything men change about themselves is purely superficial, plastic surgery & nothing more. Men will not produce eggs by say I identify as a woman. Your identity is not your sex. Sex is Xx or xy. Male or female is connected to sex identity.
So males have to be included in females' sports otherwise it's not fair on the males, but it doesn't matter that that's not fair on the females. How is that inclusion for everyone?
"Different solutions for different sports"?! What a foolish thing to say. Sex testing for eligibility is a simple solution. Would they have their own female relatives or friends be displaced, or worse, injured by a biological male in sport?
Beth Brooke-Marciniak is one of the boad directors at IOC as well as one of its most generous sponsors. She is also COMMITTED to the PROGRESSION of LGBT+ INCLUSION in the workplace. This info helps to understand the misogynistic position of IOC in allowing biological men to compete in women's categories.
It makes my head tick! They 'stole' that term from intersex people when doctors could not determine the deformed genitalia. We now have technology to confirm the sex of either male or female.
I have to confess to irritation at the lack of understanding of the particular DSD (disorder of sexual development) that thetwo Olympic boxers have. They both would indeed have been born with genitalia which appeared female. Hence a birth certificate which says female, and which was never changed when it became apparent at puberty when these individuals failed to start menstruating, and their bodies started to respond to the huge amounts of testosterone produced by testes which were internal. Hence all the physical advantages of maleness (bone strength, size, muscle differnces and the rest). So the Olympic body needs to legislate on what to do with these XY people who have 5-ARD to ensure fairness for all the XX people.
I bet that woman in the Lords would not understand a word of the excellent comment you have made. What is the saying from WW1? ‘Lions led by donkeys’. That fits perfectly here.
One or two glimmers of light up against some dark forces who do not support a women's basic right to compete against other women, excluding men in heels.
At this point it is just willfull ignorance. If one really did care, they'd know by now that those two boxers were in fact male. But for some it seems that it is too inconvenient. Cowards and liars and opportunists.
What a shit show!!!!!! They don’t like social media? Well watching videos of Imaan Khalif walk, talk, dress, hairline, voice, it is very obvious to us all. So it is more straightforward in male sport? Why tf do they think that is? 🤔
" we particlarly congratulate all those wymen, born Xy who chose to live as wymen, without identifying as trans and still managed to transform women-beating into an olympic sport"
I've checked the facts. The 2 boxers are intersex. They appeared to be female at birth but later they were found to have internal testes and XY chromosomes. Their testosterone is in the usual range for men which is 10 times the level for females. The result being they are physically much stronger than women. Draw your own conclusions.
😢what a terrible day for women in sport. Absolutely ahocking hearing ao many lies being rexited over the Male boxers being touted as female aince birth. Truly disturbing how many women endorse this. Thank god for the for the couple of women brave enough to say it as it is. The cowarsly " i'll read the report and respond in writing" ie: privately. Ahame on all of u who support this.
Men excel in sports because men designed them so. Women excel in determining which sex is which because evolution designed them so. These two athletes may have been 'assigned at birth' it's clear that mistakes were made.
We are dancing around the issue and using sport as a lightweight reason to address this serious issue. Biologists are quite clear that there are only two sexes, Male and Female. To protect these sexes we need a legal definition based on Objective Science and Biological, Objective facts that take cognisance of the XX and XY identifying facts of human existence. Transgender Ideology is based on a Thought Process that propounds that sex is socially constructed, a subjective creation with no scientific or biological facts. Our Parliamentarians and legal profession are taking the cowardly path and prevaricating on the truth to the detriment of women in particular. In reality sport is a side issue. Finally those speaking about the IOC and only women taking part in the Olympics especially Boxing, I note no mention was made of the tests carried out by an independent Labority in Paris that showed the XY chromosomal makeup of those two alleged female Boxers.
What they were "assigned at birth" is irrelevant. Nobody is "born a woman", they are born female or they are not, but it was good she felt the need to irradiate the debate by implying the criticism is racist, much in the same way Caster Semenya's critics were called racist.
Why does she keep saying speculatively? If she asked the XX athletes she would be forced to say factually. Women’s rights matter. These misogynistic pin heads can rotate. 😢😮
Society is not changing, the rights of women and children are still ranked secondary, going by this.
Who would have thought that British mums were going to become the international bulwark against misogynistic intrusions into women's spaces
@@troublesafoot7836 it's always been the way. There was a put in the 1970's to lower the consent in Germany and the US to 12. It was blocked by feminist groups. Very little opposition from others. Women are the last line of defence for children.
@@wolfhugs2221: Exactly this
Infuriating so much nonsense is peddled by MPs. They are so badly informed. Ridiculous.
Good grief - how many woman here are defending men in woman's sports?. Its unbelievable.
Boycott sports I'm not watching that rubbish .
Google Iran's "Ambassadors of Kindness". These are handmaidens of the patriarchy, and who the "Aunts" in the handmaid's tale were based on. These women are more than happy to sell out the rights and safety of other women and girls providing they get their pat on the head, and their own special privileges to lord over other women. Vile sort.
It is shocking. Truly shocking.
Absolutely shameful.
I know it’s shameful.. these are not women though, they’re handmaidens & men’s puppets
As Dr. Kathleen Stock recently stated these misogyny facilitating women need to "women up".
Awful response from the government minister. How can she be unaware of the UN report
Always women defending men participating in women’s sport, we always have to be kind, and ignore facts. Do these people seriously believe those two athletes are women? They know that those men have DSD. This is just disingenuous.
It is willful ignorance on their part which is an affront to women and girls the world over who are wanting to participate in safe and fair competition.
👏👏👏
Yes, but I ask why doesn't someone there state this fact? I am sick of this denegration of Women & Girls, in favour of men who pretend they are the opposite sex 🙄
Are those milaydees suddenly bereft of the ability to comprehend what is going on out in the world when they enter the elites by way of inheritance or political back slapping. The IOC and some of its members has not been free of corruption allegations over its years, and I'd bet there's some shenanigans behind the scenes that would make DelBoy and Arthur Daley flush with shock
I did not realise the depth of ignorance and complete absence of care that is clearly entrenched in our law makers. They are totally ignorant of the firmly established science here and have no intention of learning anything about it. The fact is that no genetic male should ever be allowed to intrude in the sport or safe spaces of genetic females, and the law makers are unable to provide any reason why they should. The failure of the law makers to even find out the facts shows them to be unfit for purpose. Shame on them. They have forfeited any moral rights to be custodians of the rights of our women and girls. This MUST be stopped.
I totally agree with you. This is due in my opinion to the fears advocacy campaigns by ngos who advocate on behalf of transgender people & those who give political donations to parties & individual politicians. The gov is captured by ngos and their idiollogies. These ngos distort facts to suit their needs (just like any private studies) and I have no doubt that some also engage in giving political donations in secret & as individuals as to not raise any suspicions. I do realise that a lot of this is pure speculation & rumours. However, how else can we explain how suddenly transgender women (biological men xy) are concidered to be exactly equal to women (biological human adult female Xx) by just claiming to be a women. How & why has this become fact when everything men change about themselves is purely superficial, plastic surgery & nothing more.
Men will not produce eggs by say I identify as a woman. Your identity is not your sex. Sex is Xx or xy. Male or female is connected to sex identity.
We really need Kelly Jay Keen there.
So males have to be included in females' sports otherwise it's not fair on the males, but it doesn't matter that that's not fair on the females. How is that inclusion for everyone?
How does she not know about that report? 😮
She obviously doesn't have much education on the subject that she's making decisions about. So wrong.
She does not know about any report, because she does not care about any report. Her ignorance is staggering.
@lornocford6482 It's disgusting!!!
"Different solutions for different sports"?! What a foolish thing to say. Sex testing for eligibility is a simple solution. Would they have their own female relatives or friends be displaced, or worse, injured by a biological male in sport?
Would they want men, fully intact flashing their equipment in female changing rooms in front of their own daughters?
Beth Brooke-Marciniak is one of the boad directors at IOC as well as one of its most generous sponsors. She is also COMMITTED to the PROGRESSION of LGBT+ INCLUSION in the workplace. This info helps to understand the misogynistic position of IOC in allowing biological men to compete in women's categories.
“Assigned at birth” 🤬😡
Good point, that hurt my ears too 😠
Yes, it is not ‘assigned at birth’. It is ‘recognised at birth’. Scientific facts cannot be ‘assigned’, they are ‘recognised’.
It makes my head tick!
They 'stole' that term from intersex people when doctors could not determine the deformed genitalia.
We now have technology to confirm the sex of either male or female.
So what if they said it was a girl, people say a lot of things. Xy is male.
Yeah, utter BS.. these people are an embarrassment
6:24 Ruth Hunt talking about scientific understanding... is this a first?
She forgot to prefix with 'psuedo'
I have to confess to irritation at the lack of understanding of the particular DSD (disorder of sexual development) that thetwo Olympic boxers have. They both would indeed have been born with genitalia which appeared female. Hence a birth certificate which says female, and which was never changed when it became apparent at puberty when these individuals failed to start menstruating, and their bodies started to respond to the huge amounts of testosterone produced by testes which were internal. Hence all the physical advantages of maleness (bone strength, size, muscle differnces and the rest). So the Olympic body needs to legislate on what to do with these XY people who have 5-ARD to ensure fairness for all the XX people.
Exactly, well said.
I bet that woman in the Lords would not understand a word of the excellent comment you have made. What is the saying from WW1? ‘Lions led by donkeys’. That fits perfectly here.
Wow, of this is an example of the house of Lords , it's bad
@@judithmorganjudyteenTo be fair, it got way worse recently.
One or two glimmers of light up against some dark forces who do not support a women's basic right to compete against other women, excluding men in heels.
Round and round in circles achieving absolutely nothing as usual. Women ONLY in women's sports.
Great it's being discussed, but so much obfuscation.
So much cowardice.
@couscous4096 true.
Shame on every woman there not concerned by females losing their right to opportunity.
A lot of misinformation here. Many of the speakers are poorly informed of the facts behind the Olympics cases
At this point it is just willfull ignorance. If one really did care, they'd know by now that those two boxers were in fact male. But for some it seems that it is too inconvenient. Cowards and liars and opportunists.
Bodies play sports not identities.
What a shit show!!!!!! They don’t like social media? Well watching videos of Imaan Khalif walk, talk, dress, hairline, voice, it is very obvious to us all.
So it is more straightforward in male sport? Why tf do they think that is? 🤔
" we particlarly congratulate all those wymen, born Xy who chose to live as wymen, without identifying as trans and still managed to transform women-beating into an olympic sport"
I've checked the facts. The 2 boxers are intersex. They appeared to be female at birth but later they were found to have internal testes and XY chromosomes. Their testosterone is in the usual range for men which is 10 times the level for females. The result being they are physically much stronger than women. Draw your own conclusions.
God, this is depressing.
😢what a terrible day for women in sport. Absolutely ahocking hearing ao many lies being rexited over the Male boxers being touted as female aince birth. Truly disturbing how many women endorse this.
Thank god for the for the couple of women brave enough to say it as it is. The cowarsly " i'll read the report and respond in writing" ie: privately.
Ahame on all of u who support this.
They are men.
Ive completely changed my mind on the house of lords. I no longer want it abolished
Sex can be measured feelings of Masculinity and femininity can not
Exactly. Plus, someone's feelings of masculinity/femininity are irrelevant. It's bodies that compete in sports.
Men excel in sports because men designed them so. Women excel in determining which sex is which because evolution designed them so. These two athletes may have been 'assigned at birth' it's clear that mistakes were made.
We are dancing around the issue and using sport as a lightweight reason to address this serious issue. Biologists are quite clear that there are only two sexes, Male and Female. To protect these sexes we need a legal definition based on Objective Science and Biological, Objective facts that take cognisance of the XX and XY identifying facts of human existence. Transgender Ideology is based on a Thought Process that propounds that sex is socially constructed, a subjective creation with no scientific or biological facts. Our Parliamentarians and legal profession are taking the cowardly path and prevaricating on the truth to the detriment of women in particular. In reality sport is a side issue. Finally those speaking about the IOC and only women taking part in the Olympics especially Boxing, I note no mention was made of the tests carried out by an independent Labority in Paris that showed the XY chromosomal makeup of those two alleged female Boxers.
Different solutions for different sports
What a load of old tripe.
Goodness, why oh why is it so difficult?
What they were "assigned at birth" is irrelevant. Nobody is "born a woman", they are born female or they are not, but it was good she felt the need to irradiate the debate by implying the criticism is racist, much in the same way Caster Semenya's critics were called racist.
👁👁
Good grief, no wonder we are in such a mess 🤦🏼♀️. Erm, errr
Haven't got a clue have they?
what a waste of £300 per day plus expenses
Why does she keep saying speculatively? If she asked the XX athletes she would be forced to say factually. Women’s rights matter. These misogynistic pin heads can rotate. 😢😮
What a joke.. they HOL should be ashamed of themselves.. the IOC is a joke..
Why don't you abolish the House of Lords, for goodness sake.
This is really worrying !
Speculative? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Virtue signalling cowards.
Who are all these people
This is the British House of Lords.
As Dr. Kathleen Stock recently stated these misogyny facilitating women need to "women up".