Archetypes EXPLAINED: Introduction to Jung
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 апр 2024
- Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/0ZARzVC...
Patreon: www.patreon.com/untimelyreflections
#nietzsche #philosophypodcast #thenietzschepodcast #history #philosophy #historyofphilosophy
Carl Gustave Jung was a student of Freud, but broke from his mentor in a dramatic way. Jung acquired the reputation of being a mystic, and put forward ideas that pushed the boundaries of psychoanalysis. This is a crash course in Jung’s most important ideas: projection, archetypes, and the collective unconscious. In this episode, we go in-depth on the major archetypes that Jung describes. These are subpersonalities that exist in every human unconsciousness, which will manifest insensibly in one’s desires, and find themselves projected by the subject into the external world.
The Ego and the Super-ego walk into a bar. The bartender says "I'm going to need to see some Id."
😂😂😂
Super-Ego is the crown chakra, Blocked by ego attachment
Ego is the third eye chakra, Blocked by illusions
Id is the throat chakra, Blocked by lies
it is ridiculous that modern psychologists just renamed ancient concepts to advance their career...
@@user-ly7bj9gb5v Yeah it really is a process of westerners rediscovering things that older civilizations discovered thousands of years ago.
@@user-ly7bj9gb5v Blocked by lies, interesting concept.
Shame on you !!! 😉
"Carl Gustave Jung was a student of Freud," * What is often overlooked is Jung was a 'student' of Nietzsche for longer than Freud, especially after their break. Also the influence bleeds from the page itself - As Jung said you read more about the therapist, reading their books, than you learn of their therapies.
Nietchze said essentially the same of philosophers. Spot on.
Freud was an ignorant, dark and empty man imo. He lacked spirituality. Jung didnt. He acknowledged the human soul and thats what makes him greater. Freud has something sinister about him and Jung was kinda ..."warm".
@@allenandrews2380 Nietchze was clever he was the hit and lure type of character but then he surprises you with those he mentions to hate you would have to read their work just to understand Nietchze so bad publicity is good in his case. He fooled me but I can't claim to know everything about his work just that he is decisive.
@@calistafalcontailfrom what I have heard from Jung is like water he gets hot and cold if he freezes he can melt back to water if that makes sense.
Yo. Are you going into full on Jung like you did Nietchze?!!!!😊 Either way. You are the best man!!!!
Next week we’ll have another Jung episode, but after that we’re wrapping the season with more Nietzsche. But I’ll definitely return to Jung in the future. The freud/jung letters for sure
@@untimelyreflections
Good.
@@untimelyreflections oh man I was hoping for a ten episode playlist on Jung from you
Please do more podcasts on other German thinkers. Jung, Heidegger, Hegel, Kant, Spengler, etc
More Schopenhauer please..
@@emZee1994 100% agree with you..
Ever notice that every philosopher is a Gnostic?
Dude, thanks for all the podcasts. I’d say your stuff are among the best content on youtube currently. I usually dont comment on anything, but i just wanted to let you know that what you are doing is valuable and meaningful. Keep it up man, you are an inspiration! Lots of love from Finland! ❤
Finally I’ve been waiting for this one for ages.
samee, hope to see much more on Jung
I've been waiting for aions.
You’ll be pleasantly surprised next week
@@untimelyreflections you’re one of the only few people I listen to for these topics as you are well read and approach things from a distance, and not a set agenda or trying to sell something. You don’t infect people with complexes.
@@ChucksExotics Waiting so long im no longer a jung man
"Not everybody has virtues, but everybody has the low instincts, the basic primitive caveman suggestibility, the suspicions and vicious traits of the savage." - Jung
In every political system, people vote for their "shadow". This is not unique to a particular people either. The masses want to express this side as a means to devolve any kind of responsibility because the masses are simply beyond reason or principles and have always been trained to have their disgusts stimulated while being blind to it. Being in such an unconscious state makes them blind to their shadows. This is also why the masses are so clueless, even when political/social problems are obvious. This is also why we see so many who are supposedly “anti establishment” later promote the establishment. They merely hated who was in power at the time, but in their hearts they craved to wield that power. So they were never anti establishment, they wanted to be the establishment. Seeking political power (authority) in order to solve problems makes the common man detestable.
All thinkers (including scientists) will always argue with one another in trying to intellectually understand how everything turns, as long as they shove intuition to the role of a caboose instead of the locomotive.
Once we intuitively understand the workings of "IT ALL," we stop talking about it because it's impossible to intellectualize such a knowing. It's like writing hundreds of dissertations on how a rose smells without ever smelling it.
And when we finally smell it, we glide on the "unbearable lightness of being," as Kundera would so beautifully phrase it; without the battle and the splitting headache. Thank you for your fantastically disarming way of exploring all the philosophical insides.
You're what Marx would call an idealist, I guess.
This is the best intro to Jung that I’ve ever heard. I will be sure to tune into more of your lectures. Thanks!
Man, I’ve been soaking up every video I can find about Jung these past 2 months. That quote about the shadow and the masses absolutely gave me chills. What an exhilarating frame of mind to approach humanity
Jordan Peterson, am I right or what?
My favorite “philosopher”
Man, I could not be more happier. I was just wondering the other day it would be amazing if you would have read Jung and posted about his ideas.
Damn bros doing carl jung now???? That's wild super excited for this
I’ve always had the desire to get into Jung’s work. I’ve read a few texts by him but for some reason cannot get behind most of his ideas no matter how much I want to. I love Nietzsche and love your commentary on him. Best on youtube for sure! Looking forward to this one. Thanks for all the great work you do!
I recommend Psychology and Alchemy. It’s a difficult but rewarding book, that will be valuable even if you agree with none of Jung’s ideas: as a historical, psychological study if nothing else, almost a work of anthropology or philology
@@untimelyreflections
"The Redbook" Libra Novus edited and with an Introduction by Sonu Shamdasani and other updated writings even today.
Psychology and Alchemy and his book on UFOs are really good. AION is another one but deep and jumps from thought to thought.
I suggest you should start to write your dream, until it's started to appear as an episodic story. Just describe and inquire what you had experience during the dream and reflect on current or persisted problem in your life. Familiarize yourself with the imaginary until you are aware it's meaning. Then look at Jung ideas on archetype.
This is the best channel. Well done!
Stoked for this one!!
been waiting for you to get into jung! thank you brother
I'm very greatful to have found your channel, thanks for sharing!
wow Jung is what got me into Nietzsche! Excited for this episode!
Nietzsche got me into Jung. Lol
Finally! Im so stoked for this season. Im currently reading The Portable Jung.
I would love to see a deep dive into Jung! Great video! Great content! Thank you!
May we please do a text revision and study of Erich Neumann's 'History and Origin of the Unconscious' - its definately worth the hype. Or Von Franz' 'Way of Individuation'. I love Jung; but Jungians can be just as fascinating.
Absolutely amazing synopsis of the man and his life, great job working on this video very much appreciated.
No one mentions i ching when they talk about jung. 😂😂😂
This was really helpful so far and I’m only half way in. Thank you for a great teaching.
Nice, was waiting for his introduction on this channel
Have you ever considered doing a video on Don Quixote/Cervantes? I think it could make for a really interesting discussion
Great!
Timestamps would be good
Tramp -stamps are for those of a right brain deficit.
omg! is there an exam at the end ????
Very thorough, good vid, thanks.
Holy shit, the king has started his Jung pilgrimage!
So pumped for this, you are the best!
This was great. Thank you.
Coherent and efficient. Thank you.
My shadow followings me everywhere in my path. Love this channel!
Professor Ricahrd Bishop worked widely on different aspects of analytical psychology and its place in intellectual history. His books examine different aspects of analytical psychology and its place in intellectual history. His books examine the history of ideas with an emphasis on Jung, Nietzsche, and Ludwig Klages ( Jung is saying the great- grandmother the basard son of Gerta. Is it true or not- Jung said it is an annoying legend.
Professor Richard Bishop is the editor of Numerous Volumes, including Jung in contests.
1. The Persistence of Myth as symbolic Form.
2. A Companion to Goethe's Faust & the Descent of the Soul & the Archaic.
3. Jung's Answer to Job
4. Nietzsche's Anti-Christ
5.The 2 volume series Analytical Psychology & German Classic Aesthetics
6. His latest book, Reading Plato Through Jung: Why The Third Becomes the Fourth
I can't wait until you get to Jung's letters.
So many writers contribute the updates to Carl Jung, Jungian analysts, and many may disagree. What an amazing adventure in one of greatest minds of C.J. Jung's writings.
It was fortunate that the family kept his blackbooks and paintings in a bank vault until our world could awaken more.
The time was ready especially now.
Thank you, great lecture.
i like how you made this.some more visual would be nice but all good though, lol
Whoa… how the hell are you doing this? Your talks are better than most professors. You seem to be doing a an “Alan Watts” or a “Dan Carlin” move here, like you know exactly what you want to say seemingly without any notes or practice in a classroom.
I’ll stop gushing here but with two requests;
1) Can you spend some time on Heidegger? I think you can nail it.
2) Can you mention anywhere something about your method for putting these talks together !! I’m interested in your process as a communicator.
Thanks.
🙏
There was a little red book i once took out from the library - the preface the best insight into jung by jung and the author of the book. It was a collection of his best essays i believe , and his comments were weitten post red-book. I highly highly reccomend you tp read it if you can find it.
There is no greater mystery than our minds. Thank you for this lecture. Love Jung.
Not gonna lie, i will need to listen to this on repeat at least 3x.
Same and take notes too 😂
You gotta read John Beebe's matchup of Jungian archetypes with Jungian cognitive functions.
Great Video :)
Well done, I’m looking forward to the Jungian analysis of our beloved tortured genius. Suggestion, how about an episode on the master/slave morality using the famous chapter from Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamozov- the Grand Inquisitor. I reread it today, and was struck by brother Ivan’s parallel to Nietzsche’s theory. I felt a deeper understanding of that hypothetical tale due to a better understanding of Nietzsche via reading his Twilight, Beyond, Genealogy, etc, and- of course- your excellent podcast- my God that content rescues me from the tedium of boredom at my job. Gracias
Ongoing greatness and mastery🔥
Very glad you put this one together.
I've been deeply influenced by both Nietzsche and Jung in the last 4 years and often wondered how Nietzsche would have handled Jung's criticisms of him and his work.
I suspect he (Nietzsche) would have had no trouble defending himself, as his sharpness of wit and intellect was superior to Jung's, not to mention that the roots of Jung's psychology were a direct result of Nietzsche's influence upon him.
Thank you again for the excellent, thought provoking work, Keegan.
z
What is your name? (your voice sounds like Scott, the NewAge guy).
Commenting for history
I saw the discussion about going further into Jung - Are you familiar with Jung himself admitting that his Red Book/Liber Novus a failed attempt(Jung admits it may be impossible) to create his own Zarathustra(book)? I say it is pretty obvious the influence of both The Imitation of Christ(A little red book , Title and section naming...) and Thus Spake Zarathustra. I believe you and your audience would get a great deal out of a study.
So good
whenever Jung describes a dream one of his patients told him, I get a feeling that one of them is lying about the incredible details of the dream that fit nicely into his explanations and theories
We all seem to fall under the factors we make or given to Leaving us with a sum total of reflection from projections
"The soul, she seeketh, but she knoweth notteth whatteth."
Dude!!! I just saw you guys at Whitewater Tavern! Remember the guy in the smoking area that said you looked familiar? Now I know why!
Woah! That's crazy. What a coincidence.
@@untimelyreflections ikr! Been subbed for about a year and a half, just never really delved into your music related content and only caught a couple IRL posts. You honestly lucked out, I would have talked your ear off about philosophy if I'd realized who I was talking to 😂 you guys played a killer show, y'all gotta come back to AR after hiatus!
@@thehermit_777 My new band Slumbering Sun will definitely be back in the near future!
The Whitewater sounds rad, tech bros abound perhaps.
@@numbersix8919 it's a sleazy dive bar. you've been commenting a bunch with some wild ideas of what this channel is, maybe chill out a little bit
I have always been amazed by how Jung was influenced by Nietzsche. I do believe that these types of thinkers are connected by some arcane think red thread and somehow they follow the work of the previous like it was just the continuation, a sort of intergenerational connection and understanding. They are like the Voyager satellite for the Human kind, sent in the deeps on the conscious to explore the unknown and the frontiers of what is to be human.
What if one does not have dreams? I've met more than a few .
i feel as though one must look at the archetypes through a lense of nuance. I think engendering the archetypes is an over anthromorphization of instinctual mental complexes and that this is derivative of the times in which he lived
I hate to sound like Bill and Ted from Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventures - but this is really EXCELLENT!!
I think you wanted to sound like that.
@@Dont_have_to_agree - lol. I'm sure I did subconsciously 😂
Essential Viewing. ( The Mystery Lecturer Rides Again !!! ) 👍🤔 ( "Green Fire", geoff nelson hill, any bookshop UK / US ) 🌈🦉
Is this Steven Hicks speaking. Sounds just like him. He did some documentary on the Neitchze and the Nazis.
I think if you listen to my interview with Steven Hicks, you’ll see our voices are quite different
wa-- wait, monsieur Keag!!... o, thou presto Nietzschean god, thou... THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA read-through... stopping after each section to provide unique creative double KK deep-dive analysis... though if ye taketh upon thyself... this seemingly insurmountable feat... i will come in me panties at the very thought of such superman-esque willing to power, as 'twere!!
you know i'd pay you, right??... USD compensation is only natural... most barbarian of you... and i would expect nothing less... (what is noble?!)
I’m sorry, but the next readthrough shall be a different book. I have it planned out already!
@@untimelyreflections but i lie!!... how i delude myself!... (if you live long enough... then you must do them all... you are too great a mind to waste on less than that!!!)... *KISSkiss*
Oh, this channel! I'll time-stamp the obligatory reference to Ayn Rand.
What are you talking about bro
@untimelyreflections Hey where's my other comments?
????
Based!
I've heard that there are two words that scare Jungians and other Folk Psychologists:
E l i m i n a t i v e M a t e r i a l i s m
i can only hope you'll do ZARATHUSTRA someday... but it must be in your time... by your will (your will to power??)... o, perish the thought!!
though, perhaps, ZARATHUSTRA is too great for your ambition, yes??... (don't wake the sleepingGIANT!!).
...from his dogmatic slumber. (lol)
it's GAY SCIENCE... i know it!!... (tell me i'm a f*cking liar)... lololo
Reading C. G. Jung = right hemisphere neuron activation 📖🐒
Oh shit, waddup! 🐸
"Ark-types?" What's an ark-type?
Was Freud interested in hiding his influences and claiming originality for himself and his ideas?
You sound like Hicks
Jung's ideas are just so flimsy next to those of Nietzsche, Freud, or even Adler.
I would prefer to use the word subtle. Jung is in agreement with Nietzsche on many elements of human psychology only he doesnt expound them in such a bombastic way as Nietzsche. I look forward to the next episode for Jungs critique of Nietzsche is perhaps the single most important psychological analysis in the history of philosophy. Its just a shame Nietzsche was unable to read it and offer his views of Carl Jungs thought 😊
Ideas don’t have to be grand to be significant or noteworthy. The fact that the West collectively denounces the subtle yet important ideas is why it’s currently on a death spiral. Disregarding the shadow doesn’t make it go away, the shadow instead grows and grows, eventually growing to the scale of a Lovecraftian monster who creeps up on us and attacks us on the rear. I firmly believe this is why so many of the West’s institutions are failing at the moment.
The 12 gnostic "archons"... No such thing as man made magic.
it doesn’t matter
you are a god amongst mere men... (do you know that, Keag?!)... ((i wonder if you know that...)...).
The priestess loves the fool
Awesome ❤ 😈☠
bro please cop a better mic
Ah, Nietzsche’s lamest copycat
People ask me about Jung and I simply say, "I was born in 1981, not 1881, I didn't talk to him." Reading the language of his writing is useless if you don't translate it to today. His world no longer exists. Sitting in a graveyard, regurgitating obituaries is useless. The dead don't care. Useless.
Great ideas transcend worlds and ages - these ideas were useful in Jung's time, a thousand years before his time and they are useful now. Jung even said the same thing in his writings, that he was just breathing new life into old ideas. Nothing is new under the sun. Truth and the essence of reality never changes, it doesn't matter how much the world changes.
Homie come on this topic is literally how certain themes are timeless and manifest themselves in different ways throughout time.
@@willissudweeks1050 When did time begin and how far back are you declaring "timeless"? Human arrogance. If your best thoughts are a hundred years old, what purpose is there for you. Sheeple of history do genocide because of beliefs. Keep it up and you'll be next.
@@witHonor1 That really just doesn’t make much sense as a reply
@@willissudweeks1050 It's not for you. Sheeple. I do battle with Skynet here. You'll never be intelligent enough to thank me. Anytime you do something, consider how predictable it is, then choose not to share it. You are the algorithm you're afraid of and I'm warning you. I know you're human because you failed the Turing test miserably.
Jung is and was and will be the most overrated THINKER that time's been involved with. The amount of trickle-down nonsense he spawned via his fever dreams is INCREDIBLE. Dude would be the host of a daytime talk show if he existed today
dude couldn't even tie his own shoes without an ensuing lapdance
Another day, another slay!