Tennis Hard Court Drama 2023 | Part 10 | I Don't Give a Rat's Bum About Her Pace
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 дек 2023
- A compilation of drama and controversies that occurred during the 2023 hardcourt swing. Featuring Aryna Sabalenka, Jessica Pegula, Yulia Putintseva, Belinda Bencic, Tatjana Maria, Anastasia Potapova, Patricia Maria Țig, Maria Sakkari, Qinwen Zheng, and more. Enjoy🎾
Second channel : / @tennisadvocatesunited
Twitter : / tennisadvocate
Instagram : / tennisadvocate
Facebook : / tennisadvocate
Merch store: teespring.com/stores/tennis-a...
#Tennis
#TennisDrama
#TennisArguments 
Спорт
The first Potapova clip is unreal. Umpire needs to be fired.
I think someone should give Tig the tennis rulebook for Christmas this year lol
Well it doesn't seem she "gives a sh@#". She's "doing her thing".... I think Tig is the only person who can get away with saying that. So sassy.
Putintseva never misses an episode
Potapova/Arango:
If you challenge while the point is live and lose the challenge, you lose the point. In this case the point was over when the line judge made the call, meaning the challenge came on a point meant to be replayed. Either the umpire did not see that Potapova put the ball back in, or she is saying that Potapova stopped the point with her challenge before the call, both of which are incorrect.
Solution - at the ATP and WTA levels, all umpire chairs should require a video replay feature on the tablet (with audio), for umpires to check timings of things upon request and disagreements of fact, such as the case here.
I agree, and I'm sure they would welcome that option. The umpires can't look at both sides of the court at the same time, and this umpire was probably looking at Potapova, who was about to challenge the call, and she ended up overruling and calling the ball in as well. That's a lot going on in the same moment, and no umpire can pay attention to everything at the same time. A replay system would help immensely.
But what made it worst is that the umpire is so cocky that she cant call the supervisor. Also, what the umpire was saying didnt make sense, so she didnt get what was going on.
ridiculous decision the umpire protects the line judges wrong call
I was very worried about not seeing Putintseva during all the video. Fortunately, We got her at the end
She’ll always be there
Tig has the worst posture of any tennis player I've seen. Or any athlete for that matter.
Goes with her unpleasant personality.
The 1st Potapova umpire should never umpire a match ever again. Totally clueless. To be that wrong, and not know why she is wrong, is unbelievable
that's the right call, the ball was called in, she challenged it, the ball was indeed in, she lose the point. From the moment you use the challenge if you are wrong you lose, if you are right you win the point or replay depending on the context, but she cannot win or replay the point being wrong on the challenge.
@@LoLDremmah You have it all wrong I'm afraid. If the line person hadn't made the mistake of calling it out, the point would have continued as Potapova had hit the ball in. The umpire was going on about hindrance which is totally irrelevant in this situation. Nothing to do with the challenge. Even the commentator said so.
@@KK426LH And where did you find yours? You don't get two chances to win the point. LolDremmah is correct.
Umpire did her job, Potapova needs to learn rules
@@MarcoSpeaksNadsatWhile you might be right that the reason the umpire gave was not correct, the outcome was still correct, as @LoLDremmah explained to you. The moment Potapova chose to challenge and the challenge turned out against her, she lost the point. So the umpire might not have been right as to why she lost the point. But she did rightfully lose the point.
Tig with that trademark glacial speed
Cannot wait for the tennis season to begin again. Thank you, TA for all your content this year! ❤
🙏💚
This Tig person needs to be told how tennis works. I'm shocked by her entitlement and lack of regard for her opponent and the chair umpire. She is absolutely delusional on every level and needs to be suspended for this behavior. If I had any power I would make it a point penalty to purposely take extra time as the receiver and make your opponent wait. That would stop the behavior right away.
11:38 "it's a rule of tennis"
Maaaan we should hear this more often, straight to the point 👌🏼👌🏼
This, but they should actually detail the intricacies of the rule as needed for the situation. I feel like almost all of them lack the ability to understand situations and explain themselves in detail, whether it be for lack of feeling like they need to or translation issues. There was a situation between Tiafoe and Raonic in Toronto this year that was handled exceptionally well by Fergus Murphy. If all situations were effectively explained in detail, there would be a lot less of an argument by players.
Matoula was really hard done by in that match. From the server's pace rule not being enforced to that shocking call at the end when Tig shouting 'out' in the middle of the point wasn't heard by the umpire. I don't know how it happens, but the WTA gets the worst umpires.
most people have specific grunts, putintseva has "the ball was like this out"
The last one with Maria & Putintseva was peak drama. I needed two hours straight of this shit.
No Ostapenko this time 😢
Thank god
She is on holiday in the mediterranean( i follow her isntagram!)
@@twinklesuperpalm Follow bro follow LOL
that scream at 13:40 lmao
typically not a good sign for the chair umpire when both players are irritated with you by the end of the match
Of course miss WOZ I TALKING TO TOU? is back 😂😂
Tig is so annoying
The Potapova point is weird:
Arango hits ball in, line-man calls it out, but umpire overrules it, Potapova hit's the ball back in anyway.
In this scenario umpire should've made them replay the point, right? Since it was stopped because of a line judge's mistake, and she hit it back in.
But she doesn't want a replay, she challenges, expecting the ball to be out, so that she wins the point.
The slow-mo replay shows that the ball was in, so she doesn't win a point, so it should go back to replaying the point, right? Why would the umpire ever give point to Arango?
Did the supervisor come and clarify it? Were they on the side of the umpire?
Yes. This should have been a point replay regardless of the challenge.
Even if Potapova returned the ball she stops the point to make a challenge. The call is in, so for me she lost the point. But this umpire is so bad that she can even tell her the reason...
Potapova decided to challenge the call/overrule and therefore she lost the point when she lost that overrule. She did not have to overrule, in which case she would have gotten to replay the point. The umpire made the right decision, but strangely enough for the wrong reasons (hindrance had nothing to do with this).
@@remisaulneron8968 "she stops the point to make a challenge" but she didn't stop the point, did she? I thought the umpire stopped the play after she corrected the mistake? Or were they supposed to continue playing after all that "Out! Correction! The ball is in!"?
Also, usually the challenge is deciding between whether the ball is out and player A wins, or whether ball is in and player B wins. But in this case if ball was in it is a replay, because the player hit it back.
@@DvdStennis Considering that the umpire ruled there was hindrance and believed that Potapova's shot didn't land in, she was screwed either way no? If she hadn't challenged, the umpire simply would've said her return didn't land in and the call was late so it would've been Arango's point not matter what from the view of the chair.
Tig needs to get her eyes fixed if she honestly thought that ball was on the inside of the line.
I love the parts of putinseva😂
Very entertaining 🤣🤣
The girl just yelling "FUCK!!!" Been there on a tennis court.
At tennis umpire training school do they teach them the phrase 'this is a question of fact'. I hear them say it so many times. Carvalho just kept parroting it without even considering she might be wrong.
I guess so, probably a phrase from the rulebook. But most seem oblivious as to the actual facts…
Yes, and at tennis player school they teach them the phrase "call the supervisor".
@@IceStationZebraAssociates touché! 😄
It is a thing that umpires are taught, mainly because the rules are devided in 2 sections: base rules and questions of fact. For example, if a player asks ''how many times can a ball bounce?'' that's a base rule (and a supervisor can be called for such things because he doens't need to see what happened in order to make a decision), if instead the problem is something that a referee needs to see in order to make a decision (ball in or out, double bounce etc) then that is a question of fact (and the supervisor cannot/should not be called)
at the Potapova controversy, obviously the referee does not understand main english
Damn Guangzhou was a complete clusterfuck wasn’t it?
Umpire Ana Carvalho is completely clueless.
Man, did you bungle that name.
@@pedroquedas8369 must have been really tired when I originally commented, cheers
@@FlareonEevee1it's ok, some Portuguese names can be a handful ;)
The amount of destroyed rackets in Tennis, it's a wonder their sponsors don't withdraw their contracts. Poor rackets.....
Tremendous!!! Thank you.
🙏💚
I feel terrible for Matoula, thid was her first Tour level match and Tig/the umpire made it terrible. 2024 will hopefully bring better luck for her!
Maria vs Putintseva is a gem 😂
Oh god how I missed Tig on court, she’s brilliant
How’s it weird? Umpire made a blatant mistake and that’s why Potapova is pissed
"one bad word..." 😂😂
Arango vs Potapova: once again an umpire didnt remember where the ball after the call was landing. just give them the right to use the technology to check if the ball was inside. its there, use it.
Potato: Call the supervisor
Commentator: Oh no ... 😆
I wonder if Tig's first name is Karen
I see a tennis advocate video, i click
🙏💚
How the fck did Tig not get a warning at the very least?? Infuriating
13:46 scream all you want but remember it’s how you play
I don't care if she's wrong half the time, I just love Tig's attitude lol. And that look from Putinseva at the end ☠☠
Tig is a badass!
10:07 She stopped the play!
🔝🔝
Appearance leaderboard (2+ appearances)
Note: Does not include earlier copyright-striken videos
ALL CAPS = Known to be retired
Paire 35
Putintseva 24
Kyrgios, Ostapenko 20
Fognini, Sakkari 14
Moutet 13
Djokovic 12
Cornet, Medvedev 11
Tsitsipas, Collins 9
Siniakova, Shapovalov, Giorgi, Schwartzman, Zverev, Karatsev, Nishioka 7
Sandgren, Van Uytvank, Evans, Bublik, Davidovich Fokina, Rune, Rublev, Siegemund, Dzumhur 6
Tauson, Khachanov, Opelka, Ruud, Gulbis, Pliskova, Kokkinakis, Zhang (the player), Thompson, Zhang (the umpire) 5
Tomljanovic, Mladenovic, Martínez, McNally, Auger-Aliassime, Bencic, Maria, Tig, Pegula 4
3---------------------
Azarenka, Andreev
Bautista Agut
Dart
Gasanova
Haddad Maia, Hurkacz
Ivashka
Kalinskaya
Lestienne, Linette
Munar, Musetti
Olivo
Potapova
Rybakina
SOCK, Simon, Stephens, Sousa, Swiatek, Sabalenka
Teichmann, Tiafoe
VANDEWEGHE, Verdasco
Wozniacki
Yastremska
Zheng
2--------------------
Anisimova, Andreeva, Altmaier
Babos, Berrettini, Blanch, Brooksby, Bronzetti, Borges
Carreño Busta, Coria, Cecchinato, Carballes Baena, Cirstea, F. Cerundolo
Danilovic, Dimitrov
Fritz, Fils
Garín, Gaston, Gautier, Giorgi's dad, Golubic, Garcia
Halep, Hibino
Juvan, Johnson
Krejcikova, Kudermetova
Mannarino, Murray, Mmoh
Nadal
Pospisil, Pouille, Papamichail
Riske, Roca Batalla, Routliffe, Rodriguez Taverna
Van Der Hoek
Sonego
Nick Kyrgios can curse 20 times and the umpire says nothing. WTA....one word and you are done for.
i didnt even hear her say anything, but in the blokes video novak's "this is BS" is heard loud and clear but nothing lol
Why are all umpires so stubborn and incapable of correcting or even contemplating correcting their decisions…
Why is everybody making a big deal about Potapova, she challenged, lost challenge and therefore lost the point?!
Unbelievable просто бля (с) Цитаты великих людей :)
Tig's voice; nature or nurture?
Potapova was totally ruined and she was very calm after this.
And of course the queen of these videos: Putintseva
The umpire in the Tig - Matoula match is also one of the worst ever 😹😹😹 and in addition to that Tig is one of the most unsympathetic persons to ever witnessed in tennis as well 😅
Where is Queen Putintseva?
Oh Tig.. what a horrible, horrible human being...
Your content TA is awesome. You are getting better and better every single day. Than you for your great content this year and I can't wait for the next season to start. ❤️
🙏💚
I like to dedicate Joan Jett's song "I Hate Myself For Loving You" to you ... Yulia Putintseva 😘
bro what?
Tig is such an awful cheater 😂 that is why the best she will achieve in her career is a 1st round win in Cluj Napoca and twin tournaments lol. What a loser .
Tig just isn’t a great tennis player so she wants to get her five minutes by being a complete jerk.
What a horrible lady that Tig is
Putintseva is a lil gansta!
can't wait for tig to retire. gross sportsmanship. and her opponent was wayyy too nice about these things and let her get away with them.
اخذ الكرات من اطراف الملعب حين تكون منخفضه يكون بعمليه النزول اليها بلجسد بعمليه استخدم الجلوس الجانبي. معا حركه توجه الكره ثم ظرب الكره باعلاء المظرب معا اعطاء قوه دفع متوسط للكره معا اعطاء فتح للذراع متوسط التوجه ايظن الى الامام علا مستوى ارتفاع الشبكه
Tig is so dirty
Putintseva is always extremely dramatic. 🙂 And i love all the other footage, as well.
What a dumb commentator at 2:29 "I tHinK she MiGhT aCTuAlLY have a point here" no, she is very obviously right and the umpire is just obviously 100% wrong, wtf
It wouldn't be a drama vid without seeing Cuntintseva at the end!! I was getting worried for a second lol
Does Potapova just look like a giant fish to anyone else?
for some players arguing with no reason is in their blood. Always creating problems.
I think players should not only stop playing during situations like the one with Potapova's first umpire but also they should show them videos from youtube where similar cases outcome was right
Per example there is a video of radwanska playing safarova in Doha and kader nouni explained why it was not a let
m.ruclips.net/video/vjZxsjT1b1w/видео.html
Tig was wrong for the entire match
Savages
Chinese umpires are terrible
Potapova got straight up robbed
I do not like tig, very nasty
Potapova was absolutely right
that potapova point is the most obvious replay ive ever seen lol she played the shot back.
Horrible umpire in potapova match
11:30 Why isn't it her 2nd serve, when the first serve was a fault and the 2nd serve was a correction?
ITS THE RULE DUDE! We ll buy one tennis rulebook to you for Xmas
When a second serve is either corrected by the umpire as being in (previously called out) or is challenged correctly as in (previously called out) the server gets a first serve, that’s the rule, presumably so that the server isn’t disadvantaged by a wrong call.
@@l.5679 thank you!
@@twinklesuperpalm well done.
Here's to another year of entitled country club kids throwing tantrums at pro tennis tournaments.
Lemme explain the Potapova point. Essentially, the ball was called in. Potapova challenged. The ball was out on replay. Ergo, its Potapovas point. It has nothing to do with where Porapova hit her shot. Umpire's mistake.
You are wrong too -.-
you are trolling, surely
jesus christ, Tig...
Belinda Bencic looks incredibly sexy, beautiful and hot when she is angry. My god I love her as an athlete so frickin much. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
SIR-