At 1:12 the reporter states Kurzweil invented the first synthesizer. This is incorrect. The Kurzweil synthesizer was a marvelous keyboard but credit should be attributed to Robert Moog. The concept itself is much older.
BRA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AND BELIEVEIT OR NOT HES WAS BORN AND RAISE IN BROWNSVILLE BROOKLYN NY
People need to grasp what may lie ahead. We've created technologies in the past 100 years that once seemed like science fiction. In the scope of human history, 100 years is very short. Some doubt future advancements, but exponential growth is key. The next 10 years might equal the last century in progress, packing 100 years of advancement into a decade. We can't predict exactly how this will look, but we must consider it. People may fear this inevitability, but it's crucial to face and accept it.
Yep, we had chat GPT in 2023 now we have GPT 4o and we're projected to have AGI by 2029. And we should have autonomous agents so put AGI together with the fact that it's autonomous and then have millions of those constantly researching something 24/7 and there's going to be a technological explosion of stuff researched in a short time.
Yes, technology is advancing faster than ever, and more people are working on everyday problems than ever before. So, it’s not just that technology is growing rapidly; we also have more of everything else.
Kurzweil did not invent the first synthesizer. The K250 acted more like a sampler using read only memory (ROM). There were many modular synths before the K250 (moog, etc) as well as digital (Yamaha DX7).
Having more information does not equal "smarter". It merely means you know more facts. The question is, do you understand how to use it, how to combine this new information with the information you already have in order to make better & and more useful concepts? And, as was mentioned at the end, what are the values you apply to this new information? What is the best way to use it in order to improve everyone's lives? Not only your life by way of monetizing the new information/concepts so that it has no benefit unless someone can pay a large amount of money to access it? "More" information alone does not make us better as human beings or advance civilization. It does not equal improved lives for everyone, nor does it save our planet without it being used with a more altruistic view than it seems most of us possess.
His timeline for predicting the pace of progress over the last couple decades, has been nearly spot on. I'd say that's evidence enough to at least give what he says the benefit of the doubt.
What we need is for AI to find a way to make money from housing homeless people. Because that is the world we have created. Our hands are tied from doing what is right unless if we can find the greed in it.
@DavidL-wd5pu I would too I do not and I refuse to be diagnosed with age-related diseases and go through physical decline live younger for longer and have the health span extended With the new Scientific breakthrough with epigenetic reprogramming
It would be great if the people doing the data input were not the lowest paid, lowest requirement workers so that our autocorrect, transcription and translation programs improved over time rather than declining precipitously, as have our current options...
I advocate for unfettered and unhindered growth and development of Technology. Tech is a Human creation so why not let it’s potential expand to unlimited heights? We’ve seen the incredible benefits of tech over the last 50 years. Expect exponential development over the next 50. Should be fascinating to see where it goes!
Yes, we've seen the exponential growth of tech over the last 100 years. What has it given us? I say it's been applied as much to "killing machines" ie. nuclear weapons, as to benefits. Tech is still monetized so that it mostly benefits those who have wealth. I'm in no way against technical advances. But, I am not sure that humans,as a whole, are ready to use the advances as a way to better the planet for everyone.
Using Technology for Death Machines is a Human Choice since we are essentially jungle animals and because of our inherently primitive nature Tech will eclipse us in terms of reasoning, computational power and rationality. As long as the Tech Gurus don’t program human biases into future machines we are reasonably safe.
I’ve always said it the universe is conscious and is using evolution and us to create permanent consciousness that doesn’t die meaning A.I. robotic people will be the future eventually enduring the universes survival 😮
His reasoning on living indefinitely/forever is specious. Much better to feel in control of when you feel death is appropriately timed for yourself, and take measures accordingly -- all within a internal locus of control. One might for instance stop taking prescribed medication at age 75, and stop getting periodic health screens.
I'm 72. I've never been prescribed any medication. I've never had a periodic health screen. I don't have health insurance. I don't have a primary care physician. I've never spent a day in the hospital. I may die tomorrow, but I don't think any of us are getting out alive.😬
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST? Consider the following: a. I am a human as defined by humans. b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy. c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test). d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above. * I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality? * "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later. * 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am. * Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling. * Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself. * Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die? * Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me': a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted). Although, what is 'intuition' but possibly consciously perceiving something that one did not consciously know, understand or have wisdom in beforehand? Is even 'intuition' a gateway into universal knowledge, understanding and wisdom, all done with basically the mind alone? b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality. c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is). d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
Congrats on the first published PhD length comment, though it would help navigating it if you added a contents, chapters and a Havard annotated bibliography.
@@pvillez You are welcome. Those items you mentioned would only be necessary for those who could not comprehend what I wrote. Feel free to copy and paste that comment with all those added items you mentioned.
Yhea live like 400 years, LoL 😂😂😂 I'll pass. Everything will be EXPENSIVE AS F**k. 😅😅. No thanks.... We As a Species Need to Crure GREED... First. CRIME... Second. Racism third. Poverty.... Homeless...and ONE THOUSAND OTHER PROBLEMS...
How this interviewer missed the question about our tendency towards greed, power, and destruction is beyond me. The singularity in an enlightened society would likely be beautiful. The singularity in our society…not so much.
Im kinda scared by this. Im all for the advancement of tech. This could be good for brain dead people and para palegics to make them walk and run and live again , but not a regular abled human. Theres a limit. Like if everyone was super smart what would happen to the teachers? 😢 We need to always be learning so we dont cocky and caught by the enemy off guard, and destroy our race.
'invented the first synthesizer' - not true. not even close. I don't think Ray would even say that. C'mon lets get the deets right Mr Journalist person.
how did i know it was Kurzweil? or B Goetzel. I highly doubt he invented "the synthesizer", did AI say that? the upshot to all this is that these guys, and Musk, in a very real sense, are not as astute or as conscious, as a mouse, because i have known mice, and they don't put on capes and think they are immortal.
We will not get all of our energy from solar and wind. Nice try, Ray. Nuclear is the answer for the near and medium term, while other energy technologies are developed. Ray isn’t looking so good these days. I don’t think his vision of the future is a wholly good one. Plenty of dangerous risks ahead.
The Holy Spirit Jesus Christ will save you all from this Sin of 666 Robots... You see the Bible teaches... Keep reading below .... Absolutely kidding, I just was looking around for those crazy religious zealots, felt lonely without them... Anyways... I hope we can all achieve Ray Kurzweil's Vision...
5- AI, in order to improve its performance and prevent undesirable consequences, must continuously interact with “effective rules and stable principles in the realm of existence”. @jamshidi_rahim
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](/img/1.gif)
At 1:12 the reporter states Kurzweil invented the first synthesizer. This is incorrect. The Kurzweil synthesizer was a marvelous keyboard but credit should be attributed to Robert Moog. The concept itself is much older.
Older. Yeah. Raymond Scott developed electronic music in the '50's. He probably wasn't the first, either.
Ray's wig has reached Longevity Escape Velocity
lol
BRA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AND BELIEVEIT OR NOT HES WAS BORN AND RAISE IN BROWNSVILLE BROOKLYN NY
You’re sense of humor is elementary at best. You can do better!
People need to grasp what may lie ahead. We've created technologies in the past 100 years that once seemed like science fiction. In the scope of human history, 100 years is very short. Some doubt future advancements, but exponential growth is key. The next 10 years might equal the last century in progress, packing 100 years of advancement into a decade. We can't predict exactly how this will look, but we must consider it. People may fear this inevitability, but it's crucial to face and accept it.
Yep, we had chat GPT in 2023 now we have GPT 4o and we're projected to have AGI by 2029.
And we should have autonomous agents so put AGI together with the fact that it's autonomous and then have millions of those constantly researching something 24/7 and there's going to be a technological explosion of stuff researched in a short time.
Yes, technology is advancing faster than ever, and more people are working on everyday problems than ever before. So, it’s not just that technology is growing rapidly; we also have more of everything else.
👴🏻🥃 WILL BUSTER CRABB BE DERE?
@@SeanKula👴🏻🥃 WEAR MR PEABODY AT?
@@jostsomuan8012
👴🏻🥃 IM 500 I DONT NEED HIM
Ray is 111% correct.
10% of the time
Kurzweil did not invent the first synthesizer. The K250 acted more like a sampler using read only memory (ROM). There were many modular synths before the K250 (moog, etc) as well as digital (Yamaha DX7).
Having more information does not equal "smarter". It merely means you know more facts. The question is, do you understand how to use it, how to combine this new information with the information you already have in order to make better & and more useful concepts? And, as was mentioned at the end, what are the values you apply to this new information? What is the best way to use it in order to improve everyone's lives? Not only your life by way of monetizing the new information/concepts so that it has no benefit unless someone can pay a large amount of money to access it? "More" information alone does not make us better as human beings or advance civilization. It does not equal improved lives for everyone, nor does it save our planet without it being used with a more altruistic view than it seems most of us possess.
His timeline for predicting the pace of progress over the last couple decades, has been nearly spot on. I'd say that's evidence enough to at least give what he says the benefit of the doubt.
Thank you!
Hope Ray makes it. At least he'll do something with more time. Most people don't even do much with the health span they lucked into.
War of the machines takes place in the year 2029
Hope Ray makes it 🍀
👴🏻🥃 I DONT NEED HIM IM A POWERLIFTER DAT CAN LIFT 900
He's a wonderful man who wants to reduce suffering.
Ray’s predictions are right more than 86% of the time.
Kurzweil is the Man!
OR MAYBE ...the machine!
What we need is for AI to find a way to make money from housing homeless people. Because that is the world we have created. Our hands are tied from doing what is right unless if we can find the greed in it.
The issue isn't housing homeless people. It's people who don't contribute to society that drain resources from those that do.
@@KK-pm7ud you're not A.I. no one asked your opinion
@@ScarCaskt The AI won't give you the answer. You're too dense to understand things.
thank you
If I can live forever I would.
@DavidL-wd5pu I would too I do not and I refuse to be diagnosed with age-related diseases and go through physical decline live younger for longer and have the health span extended With the new Scientific breakthrough with epigenetic reprogramming
Brah is smart 💚🖤📈🇺🇸
It would be great if the people doing the data input were not the lowest paid, lowest requirement workers so that our autocorrect, transcription and translation programs improved over time rather than declining precipitously, as have our current options...
Love longevity! ❤
I advocate for unfettered and unhindered growth and development of Technology. Tech is a Human creation so why not let it’s potential expand to unlimited heights? We’ve seen the incredible benefits of tech over the last 50 years. Expect exponential development over the next 50. Should be fascinating to see where it goes!
Yes, we've seen the exponential growth of tech over the last 100 years. What has it given us? I say it's been applied as much to "killing machines" ie. nuclear weapons, as to benefits. Tech is still monetized so that it mostly benefits those who have wealth. I'm in no way against technical advances. But, I am not sure that humans,as a whole, are ready to use the advances as a way to better the planet for everyone.
Using Technology for Death Machines is a Human Choice since we are essentially jungle animals and because of our inherently primitive nature Tech will eclipse us in terms of reasoning, computational power and rationality.
As long as the Tech Gurus don’t program human biases into future machines we are reasonably safe.
👴🏻🥃 WEAR IS U FROM THE BRONX??
@@paulyricca3881 Yes, do you automatically dislike individuals from the Bronx? From Allerton - You?
Hope I make it to Longevity Escape Velocity button->
where can I find the full interview?
Israeli AI programs such as “Lavender” and “Where’s Daddy” have significantly increased Netanyahu’s war crimes in Gaza.
We should never let them merge
It literally sounds like some terminator or matrix future
His position is based upon he doesn't want to die.
It isn't any more sophisticated than that.
So at age of 17 he wrote a Steven Hawking.
I’ve always said it the universe is conscious and is using evolution and us to create permanent consciousness that doesn’t die meaning A.I. robotic people will be the future eventually enduring the universes survival 😮
If a machine learns how to "fake" being human, as well as a human can, how do you tell them apart?
Some one will control us, that's what I really fear
@josephludwig1126 And your fears are valid I'm optimistic that horrifying stuff like that won't escalate to that catastrophic point
His reasoning on living indefinitely/forever is specious. Much better to feel in control of when you feel death is appropriately timed for yourself, and take measures accordingly -- all within a internal locus of control. One might for instance stop taking prescribed medication at age 75, and stop getting periodic health screens.
I'm 72. I've never been prescribed any medication. I've never had a periodic health screen. I don't have health insurance. I don't have a primary care physician. I've never spent a day in the hospital. I may die tomorrow, but I don't think any of us are getting out alive.😬
Biology is harder to manipulate than he thinks, that's why his biological predictions are less accurate than his computer predictions.
I’m gonna upload myself 🤘
When you get around to downloading your upload, I'm going to upload your download into your upload. Then you'll really be confused.🤭
6:59 ... Not all human values are equal or (ehm) the SAME!
The background moving during an interview HAS to go. Super distracting.
Forget solar and wind. Zero point energy!
Too bad the US govt won’t let us have zero point energy
Let's say it's not a legend, if it were true someone could create the destruction of the world or beyond with a single button
@@carlotulio3411 look up mark mccandlish and the ARV.
AI will not turn out well.
If it wasn’t a thumb it would’ve been something else.
I’ll pass.
We are ALL are going to get passed.
A Demon in Suspenders
All these guys come from Brooklyn and Queens
Fall in line. Or be the rouge nation
For whales it's not only opposable thumbs, it's fire. They can't make energy.
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
Consider the following:
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
Although, what is 'intuition' but possibly consciously perceiving something that one did not consciously know, understand or have wisdom in beforehand? Is even 'intuition' a gateway into universal knowledge, understanding and wisdom, all done with basically the mind alone?
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
Congrats on the first published PhD length comment, though it would help navigating it if you added a contents, chapters and a Havard annotated bibliography.
@@pvillez You are welcome. Those items you mentioned would only be necessary for those who could not comprehend what I wrote. Feel free to copy and paste that comment with all those added items you mentioned.
Human intelligence hasn't worked out too well. Maybe the artificial kind will do better. Or worse. Much worse.
Let’s talk about the mass unemployment AI will create. This subject is barely being talked about. Gee, I wonder why…
That will get worked out in time. We'll all feel like billionaires when the robots do all the work and everything is free.
Yhea live like 400 years, LoL 😂😂😂 I'll pass. Everything will be EXPENSIVE AS F**k. 😅😅. No thanks.... We As a Species Need to Crure GREED... First. CRIME... Second. Racism third. Poverty.... Homeless...and ONE THOUSAND OTHER PROBLEMS...
How this interviewer missed the question about our tendency towards greed, power, and destruction is beyond me. The singularity in an enlightened society would likely be beautiful. The singularity in our society…not so much.
Ask him about the sigmoid function.
AI is the death knell of humanity being ignored despite all the dire warnings. Everything that makes life worth living will be gone.
Libs don't care WHAT achieves their agenda - humans or machines.
I think you are confusing AI with political correctness
@@pvillez So AI won't imperil our ability to be racist, xenophobic, homophobic, and otherwise dislike and disparage various minority groups?
Phew!
@@pvillez 😂
Wow, phone makes us smarter? Uhh NOT!
The amount of older people watching this outdated media format and then spouting dribble in the comments is astounding.
🤣
I resemble that remark.
We won't make it
💚Freely Gorgeously Newly Lovely!‼️♥️
🌍💚♥️💜💙💚💛🧡❤♥️💜🌎
이미 우주 안에 약한 핵력이나 중력파로 작동하는 지능이 존재할거같음.
I love watching normies hear this stuff for the first time.
I'd like to be gone before it becomes impossible to be.
Im kinda scared by this. Im all for the advancement of tech. This could be good for brain dead people and para palegics to make them walk and run and live again , but not a regular abled human. Theres a limit. Like if everyone was super smart what would happen to the teachers? 😢 We need to always be learning so we dont cocky and caught by the enemy off guard, and destroy our race.
'invented the first synthesizer' - not true. not even close. I don't think Ray would even say that. C'mon lets get the deets right Mr Journalist person.
Michelle looks super yummy in pink
Hopefully gaudy suspenders will not be a future trend
how did i know it was Kurzweil? or B Goetzel.
I highly doubt he invented "the synthesizer", did AI say that?
the upshot to all this is that these guys, and Musk, in a very real sense, are not as astute or as conscious, as a mouse, because i have known mice, and they don't put on capes and think they are immortal.
I liked Ray better when he was bald.
What if the technology opens up what death is and it turns out dyeing ain't so bad. Someday people will choose to die. How bout that for a way to go.
Maybe AI could come up with a better hair piece than the monstrosity he's currently wearing. Yikes!
What are the most brilliant minds on the planet and he can’t tell how bad that hair looks? Come on ray… Give it up
OF COURSE HUMAN CREATES SOMETHING MORE INTELLIGENT THEN HUMAN. KINDA LIKE CHIMPS CREATED HUMANS.OK NOW I GET IT. FAST LEARNER I AM.
Dear god, please take the boomer maga cult before logenvity escape velocity.
amen to that and a hell yeah !!!
We will not get all of our energy from solar and wind. Nice try, Ray. Nuclear is the answer for the near and medium term, while other energy technologies are developed.
Ray isn’t looking so good these days. I don’t think his vision of the future is a wholly good one. Plenty of dangerous risks ahead.
Radical Islam has entered the chatroom...
The nonsense he is talking is increasing exponentially.
No greater huckster than Kurzweil.
he's not selling you anything, just telling you what's coming
The Holy Spirit Jesus Christ will save you all from this Sin of 666 Robots...
You see the Bible teaches... Keep reading below
.... Absolutely kidding, I just was looking around for those crazy religious zealots, felt lonely without them...
Anyways... I hope we can all achieve Ray Kurzweil's Vision...
"TRUST me - I'm a secular LIBERAL!"
Imagine an immortal Donald Trump.
Or Joe Biden the worst president in history.
😬
I think even AI would off itself.
5- AI, in order to improve its performance and prevent undesirable consequences, must continuously interact with “effective rules and stable principles in the realm of existence”.
@jamshidi_rahim