As the Quran writers made wrote in the Quran several times: "Allah is the best of deceivers." We also know him as the father of all lies, the murderer from the beginning. Excellent presentation.
@@ambassadorkees Jay is a habitual liar who practices the C1-6 LIES AND DECEPTION taught in missionary school. See for yourself: ruclips.net/video/HLPFVzJxOh4/видео.html
@@ambassadorkees ___ I would not use the word "EXPOSE". From my point of view, there simply was a SPLIT between 'trinity folks' and folks of OTHER theological schools regarding how to conceive of the 'godhead'. As with layers at an archaeological dig site, with the 'theological excavation', one has to dig down through the generations came and went, with includes a natural altering of the original texts, due to language evolutions. I do not see 'conspiracy'; I do not see 'good guys versus bad guys' religions. Happy Ramadan everybody. Love to you all.
@@ambassadorkees people wouldn’t turn to Christ. Because islamic traditions require a certain amount of faith to be accepted? It’s the exact same thing with christianity. People will only turn to Christ, if a statue of Jesus was put into the Kaaba, a sun-cross put on top of it for everyone to see and muslims were being depraved of basic human rights. Get real dude.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 Not sure what's your background, and how you see the contents of this channel, but I find your reaction 99% incomprehensible. Maybe I'll express myself in more detail. Elaborating: - Islam is full of factual flaws - Islam lacks historical backgrounds (that it claims to have) - Islam has demonstrably plagiated heaps of apocryphical or heretical jewish & christian texts, without understanding what these faiths are about - Islam claims to be monotheistic, but the reverence to Muhammad and all the actions in the hadj demonstrate the opposite - Islam's most eaamplary person was a killing, child abusing, sex-addicted, illiteral, slave trading caravan robber. - Islam's traditions of clothing, feasting (Ramadan), Jihad, degredation of women, slavery, racism and denial of education is a disaster to humanity Now: *Jay, Murad and many others do a great job exposing all these problems with Islam, accellerating the avelange of apostacy. Once people are out of Islam, they may or may no open their heart to Jesus* Exposing Islam thus enables adhering to christianity, which: - Doesn't have (that many) factual flaws - Is strongly rooted in actual history - Is original in it's views - Uses jewish long established scripture as-is, without distortion, only giving consistently a clear fulfilling meaning to many of the things Jews were expecting to happen. - Is monotheistic in that GOD is one entity. The 3 persons within the entity doesn't change that. No other messengers, rocks, buildings, wells or whatever are revered (except by roman catholics, which is to be considered a heracy) - Has an examplary person that was meak, compassionate, healing, helping, teaching, literate, ready to bring sacrifices. - Calls for freedom of expression, healthy habits, an end to slavery and racism, equal rights (not roles though), and calling to investigate, leading to eventually health care, social care, universities etc etc.
Great stuff by Murad. It fits in nicely with my latest video series. The fact that all these new puzzle pieces do fit shows that we‘re on the right track.
Sorry to disappoint you, but Murad is either lying or ignorant in Arabic, though he is native Arabic speaker. .The Arabic word نسخ in ancient time meant erases or lift or eliminate. You can go to any Arabic dictionary and you will see the meaning. Now people uses it a bit little differently , but there are a lot of words in ancient times used in certain way and in modern time they are used differently. Take from example the word gay just 50 years ago it meant happy, now if you ask the younger generations about gay, the only thing that get in their minds is homosexuals and will have hard time to try to think it means also happy or joy. It is the same thing for Murad, the word نسخ meant something in the past and now it meant another totally different thing and that why Murad is having hard time to understand that it means also abrogation.
Subhanallah, St. Murad may Allah reward you for all your efforts to translate his book accurately. Inshallah we will get to read it soon. Im going to start watching your channel too for the next exciting episodes that follow. Alhumdulillah!
@Gavin James, when we are told that the Quran is the direct word of Allah given to Mohammad.......... it begs the question, why? Who cannot speak? Allah or Mohammad? Abu Bakr? Zayd ibn Thabit? Umar ibn al Khattab? Uthman bin Affan? Ali ibn abi Talib? Abu Musa al Ash'ari? Ubay Ibn Ka'b? Abdullah ibn Masood? Zayd Ibn Thabit? Abu Hurairah? Abdullah Ibn Abbas? Abu al-Darda? I understand that Arabic is very different to the Language's that the Quran is translated into..... but words are missing out! Not even 7th century Arabian people left words out of a sentence, "The cat sat on the [Mat]" and the Arabic of the 7th century is very different from the Arabic of the 8th, 9th, and 21st century! It's become a jumbled mess with some of it unable to be translated because no one knows what it actually means! Just very weird! Then we are told that some chapters are missing! Whole chapters! With Islam's love for abrigation, perhaps the missing chapters abrigate the chapters that we know of?
@@joseywales3789 It isn't so much that words are left out of the Quran (translations) as such, but words (typically names, epithets, and son on) are added. Of course there are different styles of translation, but I prefer transliterations. However, as you rightly state, the meanings of words (and hence the context of the text itself) have often been lost. Thankfully, the lost meanings may yet be rediscovered and a truer interpretation and translation may become possible one day.
Have you tried to translate the speeches of Hitler from German to English with a preconceived mentality that he was Xtian? The point is, with any preconceived idea, you can come up with a new translation to agree with your premise. AND THIS IS WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE. but they are all fooling themselves (Jay and Murad) as the Quran is understood in the Arabic of it's time, Classical Arabic - and Arabs since the time of Mohammad (saw) questioned everything, especially the Disbelieving Arabs and NONE had a quarrel on the words used in the Quran. TRANSLATORS - Muslim and Non-Muslims have the same translation and usage of key words. EXAMPLE FROM A NON-MUSLIM with many degrees versus a HATER OF ISLAM (Murad) The Koran Interpreted is a translation of the Qur'an (the Islamic religious text) by Arthur John Arberry. The translation is from the original Arabic into English. First published in 1955, it is one of the most prominent written by a non-Muslim scholar. The verse in question Quran Arberry: And for whatever verse We abrogate or cast into oblivion, We bring a better or the like of it; knowest thou not that God is powerful over everything?
Brilliant video by St Murad.I too am waiting with bated breath and high expectations of Murad's quranic translation which will be one of a kind .Keep up the good work St Murad and thanks to Dr Jay too.
@@alonzoharris6730 You always have to deflect and say something to get ATTENTION.St Murad is talking about the quran and you deflect to the Bible, you prove it unknowingly that you have no defense for your book.Let me award you the title of the best" copy paste expert" of the 21st century Alonzo.( Like your god you have more than 99 accounts...Lol) Shameful that you go to websites that spew vicious stuff against the Bible without actually exegeting.. typical abdoolian strategy.Reminds me of a dog ferociously looking for fleas. Also the word nosakh fits you right.How about explaining surah As- Saffat 37:125 the name Baal of a pagan god written on an eternalgolden tablet al- lawh al- mahfouz???? Bangla boy enjjjjjoy ya feasting.Bless your heart.
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: @Murad/videos
A couple years ago I downloaded a free copy of the Quran. I read the entire Quran & my thought was that it was not all that radical or out of place in the modern world. I then started watching all these videos from Jay and others & realized I had a sanitized copy of the Quran. I then started to reading accurate information about the Quran & the Hadithes & got the real truth of Islam, & it ain't pretty. Islam with be gone in 50 years & the world will be a better place.
Great Explanation of the many different ways that the Perfectly Preserved Holey book's words are manipulated. The Religion of Abrogation, Confusion, and Let me Explain! In conclusion one word can mean whatever they want it to mean depending on the argument! The qur'an is still Evolving! Great Job! God Bless you Both!
Are you that gullible to believe HATERS OF ISLAM on Islam? Have you got no sense? IN ANY LANGUAGE One word have different meanings and the way you choose the synonym is according to the context. When the Quran was revealed, it sets how the Arabic language should be used.
@@aaabrams1889 Hate? Stop Crying! Hate is someone leaving islam and getting killed for it! Hate is killing a Teacher because she had a dream and she told her students and they decided that she said something bad about momo that's hate! That is what you should be condemning! If you make a claim you should be able to Defend it! You don't see Christians calling you guys Hateful when you attack our beliefs! Stop being a hypocrite! Leave that Victim Mentality it's getting Old! Good day sir!
If we need to determine a word's meaning by first understanding its context, then doesnt that mean the vocabulary in the language itself is not perfect? You're implying that a supreme god revealed its perfect messages on an imperfect language?
I like what Murad is trying to do and I am sympathetic to his thesis. That said, as a bit of constructive criticism, I would like to throw in a word of caution about his stated translation philosophy. One cannot in general take a word in one language and always translate it by a single word in another language because words have a semantic range and so can mean different things in different contexts, and it is rare that a word's semantic range in one language will be identical to the semantic range in a single word in another language. So in English the word "strike" can mean to hit, but in other contexts can mean delete (strike that line), or to go out on a work stoppage in a labor dispute, or with the word "out" can mean to miss hitting a ball for the third time in a baseball game, or to initiate something (strike up a tune), or ignite something (strike a match), or to make or ratify something (strike a deal) and so forth. As a noun strike can mean a blow, a work stoppage, knocking down ten pins in a bowling game, not hitting a ball in baseball, etc. I doubt there is a single word in Arabic that can mean all of these things, so different Arabic words would have to be used translate different contextual meanings of "strike." What I think Murad is actually trying to say is that translators are rendering two words in the abrogation verse with meanings that are not otherwise attested in the Quran (or any other ancient Arabic) where a well-attested, common meaning of the two words in the Quran makes perfectly good sense and, if the well-attested meanings are adopted, that explodes the abrogation interpretation. In such cases the burden of proof is on the translator adopting an unattested, conjectural meaning for a word where there is a well-attested alternative.
@@I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid True of all languages. This is why taking a meaning from modern English is dangerous when reading archaic English. The same applies to using modern Arabic to read the Quran. Murad's method of developing a dictionary based on attested meanings in the Quran rather than later commentary makes good sense. On the other hand as a native speaker of Arabic he needs to be careful not to read his own modern Arabic meanings into Quran words. If he can limit himself to meanings that can be derived from the Quran itself or ancient Arabic that would be great .
@@joesprinkle What does attested meaning even mean? Murad choice of translation is also based on a meaning transmitted by people. Language doesn't exist by itself. Language is transmitted by people from generation to generation. Murad relies on muslims for meanings of Arabic words. He could never have known the meaning of Nasakh without early muslims who wrote books about the Arabic language and classical Arabic dictionaries. He is using double standards. He is pretending as if meaning of words exist by itself. That's why I find him a clown with double standards.
@@joesprinkle - like all writings, peers who care for the truth can help him correct it to which he can then print later updated editions, since he’s not claiming to be translating golden tablets himself 😉
@@alonzoharris6730 Attested in this context means you can prove that a word's meaning "existed" by a clear example in a usage in a particular text or time period. In English the word "jump" is attested in various texts from various times, but the meaning "jump" in the sense of "jumping a car" often in the winter when a battery has become too weak to turn over a starter is not attested in texts written before the time that batteries began to be used to start cars or engines. To read the old nursery rhyme "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack JUMP over the candle stick" which existed in the early 1800s as implying by "jump" some sort of electric charge as in the "jumping" of cars in the winter is to read a meaning of a word from a later time period into a text from an earlier time where that meaning is simply impossible. That is why for any ancient text it can be useful to attempt a synchronic dictionary of attested meanings of a word from that particular text along with texts from the same time period, so far as that is possible. Where usages remain unclear it is still possible to look at later (or earlier) time periods to see if an attested meaning later (or earlier) might explain a particular usage, but since words change meanings over time is preferable to derive a meaning from the same time period. This is commonly done in New Testament studies where one prefers to derive the meanings of Greek words from usages in the NT or at least the Hellenistic period around NT times rather than resorting to meanings only well-attested much earlier in classical Greek or much later in Modern Greek. It would be a useful scholarly exercise to apply that method to the Quran.
Spencer is not a native Arabic speaker, and while I like what he has done, it is important that we get someone who at least knows the language intimately.
@@pfanderfilms That's pretty much what I meant. Although I note that nobody now living is a native speaker of *Quranic* Arabic and I've heard Arabs speak of having difficulty with it.
Once all this new information (including Murad's dictionary and translation) is properly disseminated to the middle-east and the world, islam is finished!
Thanks Murad and Dr. Jay, I thought the text is preserved perfect word for word dot by dot letter by letter!! Giggle, well it did take a long time to canonized so yes its went under lots of change as it revolved and still is revolving... I seen a clip on Thomas channel saying there is 12,000 lies in the Quran. GBU peace..
Let me add my Hebrew knowledge to this. In hebrew, Nusakh means - version/form/copy/variant The word 'le'nase'akh' means - to phrase/rephrase. In Rabbinic literature, there is the issue of scribal errors or different traditions of Talmudic manuscripts. So you can often see a Rabbi writing a commentary on Talmud and sometimes he would say "this version (nusakh) makes more sense in comparison to that version (nusakh). It is clear that the Muslims used this word in a completely different sense. Instead of the meaning referring to an innocent difference due to scribal error, or different manuscript traditions, the Muslims have changed it to mean intentional cancelation / abolishing of clear text. P.S The Hebrew Tanakh has also a few variants. Mostly omitted/added vowels, but never is it used to say "oh, this used to be the case but now we no longer take this into account because of 'abrogation'.
Oh really? Which hebrew tanakh are You talking about? And which rabbinic judaism? The septuigant is greek and the tanakh from the temple in Jerusalem disappeared after Titus Vespasian took it to Rome. If You’re talking about “innocent differences”, You need to point out in which book. We know from messianic judaism that whole prophecies were being updated, since the Qumran jews managed to hide the “tanakh” from the Romans. If a translated text for You is authentic, there’s only this much You can say about scribal errors, do You?
Rabbi's used Arabic for Hebrew. Hebrew is not even language. It's just a human project of a couple individuals who used the OT to revive a language. Is this word found in the tanakh?
@@Danielst15lm Hebrew is not a language. It has never been spoken by people. The language of the OT is Canaanite. What later has been written down by rabbis is a language constructed based on the Tanakh. It's a human contruct. Nobody spoke the language of the Tanakh. They used Aramaic and Arabic to know meaning of words. That's why you find many Aramaic and Arabic words in 'Hebrew'. Because these words don't exist in the Tanakh. The Tanakh has a limit of words.
Watch Christian prince other day he had a caller two years ago very angry he called several times, yesterday he called again and was very calm and able to except the er problems in the Qur'an...CP stated it took two years.
You choose to deliberately not understand their doctrine of Trinity. It's One God who manifests in three persons as The father then As the son Then As the spirit
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: @Murad/videos
Creating an exhaustive dictionary is a rather huge undertaking. It would be a key tool for the next step of writing a concordance. They have been one of my major go to resources for the Christian scriptures. I believe most people are not proficient in speaking our own native language. For a person to speak in complete grammatically correct sentences during a conversation isn't as common as I once thought.
I hope Murad's translation will make the Quran readable. I once tried reading the Quran. It was impossible for me to understand the verses, its like they literally didnt make any sense.
Because it’s scripture. You are supposed to recite it in rhythmic patterns. Do You go to church to venerate pictures wearing bermuda shorts and eating a sauerkraut hotdog? No, You dress up nicely, You probably have taken a shower, maybe put some kind of perfume on Your neck and approach others in a respectful manner. Some like to worship statues, others revere a text. Have You ever heard christians saying that Jesus spoke to them or that they saw him? Or that Jesus lives inside of them? Muslims reading the Quran do this for the same reasons: they want to meditate themselves into higher spiritual grounds. They don’t read the Quran to understand it, just like christians don’t pray to Mary to understand something. It’s a ritual. It doesn’t make sense, because it’s not designed to make sense. It’s supposed to comfort believers.
'We never send down a false sign; a true sign can only be replaced by a better sign', so we're not going to have our prophet pull a rabbit out of hat, just to prove he is a prophet, when we have parted the sea, brought the dead back to life, etc.
The translations and change from good thoughts to evil and by whom and where and when is needed. What cult influenced evil to be slid in and added to the lectionaries?
The goodness of social media. People are able to learnt the truth from all over the world. I encourage all non believers out there to read the Bible to learn the truth with an open mind. Only in the Bible you will find details if how the universe began and how it end. Prophets mean who prophesised things to come . All the prophets spoke about the coming of Jesus and it all has been fulfilled except His second coming... Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life, the Way to Salvation. Shalom and God blessed.
In holland I know a professor who is specialized in classical early text in arabic. She, my family, wrote Iskander Arabicus. But i do not know if she wants to translate coranic text.
Yes, progressive revelation, through word selection, leads to doctrinal drifting and abuses, e.g. Eph 4:14. Muslim protagonists use this abrogation ploy to win debates, while throwing the so-called quran truths under the bus.
I asked this in another thread somewhere, but I've forgotten, so what translations are the most accurate and faithful to the original that are available today, especially online. Should we go with an older version, one published before all this textual criticism became "in vogue"? Thanks! Love your work both of you. Looking forward to seeing the finished product!
DROGE'S translation is the one we recommend, because he keeps to the literal translation of the Arabic, and doesn't try to ameliorate the meaning, as most others do, including Pickthal and Sarwar.
@@johnseventhday9145 the story begins earlier, when hellenistic judaism was established in Antioch, the city that’s also called the cradle of christianity. In 167 bce, they put a statue of Zeus into the hebrew temple, because they venerated pictures and not scripture. They are hermeticists - practitioners of a secret teaching about conjuring spirits and animating statues. The “greatest story ever told” is their wizardry - the historical person who really was stripped naked, whipped in public and got crucified while being alive, is Eleazar from 2 Maccabees 6. You can read about it in Josephus’ Wars of the Jews, book 5: the high priest was crucified, because he refused to pretend eating pork. The sabbath is the written 4. commandment. The invaders didn’t recognise commandment no 1, since hellenism is what they were imposing on other nations. The sabbath is the free day for slaves and those who fought against slavery lost to the war. Perverting history doesn’t work today. The Jews survived the hostilities and don’t pay attention to a “lord” of death and the next life. They believe in god: a lord is inferior and angels are inferior to lords. The lord of christendom is Serapis. They don’t want You to know, that Emperor Hadrian explains in his letter to Servianus, that those who worshipped Serapis, called themselves christians. The christian story is mirrored in their historical records - the idea of god itself was put on its head through hermetic hellenism.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 First of all eleazar wasn't crucified he was just killed the apocryphal work does not say he was crucified second of all you are building fancies theories where are the sourecs and its obious you are a troll as many users have already answered many of your questions and you keep spamming are you a muslim who is trying to deflect from the subject of the video?
@@johnseventhday9145 Bizarre for him to be using a catholic title, since they'd be educated to a level as not to give those uninformed ideas. Reminds me of the English midlands proverb 'If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is a duck'.
That’s a foolish statement. As Dr Smith stated during this presentation, the New Testament brings ‘Progressive Revelation’, whereby for example, Jesus raises the bar in relation to the sin of adultery, in order to show the Jews that like all other sins, adultery begins IN THE HEART and actually occurs, according to Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:28, when someone looks at a woman lustfully, as in pornography. This is not abrogation, but God actually exposing the sinfulness of the human heart and that just avoiding the ACT, is no evidence of sinlessness. Besides, the Old Testament in essence reveals God’s dealings with His chosen people THE JEWS, whereas God’s intention was always to bring His light to the Gentiles also (see Isaiah 49:6 and Book of Acts 13:47), hence the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2, which was God showing He was reversing the curse of the Tower of Babel, and making Yeshua’s salvation available to the whole world.
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: ruclips.net/user/SaintMuradvideos
Hello, Please translate this into other European languages and Indian languages like Malayalam Hindi Tamil Kannada Telengu Marathi Punjabi Urdu Bengali Kashmiri etc etc and ARABIC CHINESE PERSIAN Indonesian Korean Japanese etc etc so that you can enlighten more than three and a half billion people. 🌹👍
Deception, deception, deception. All a big drama reality tv, horror, fantasy show for this Allah. Just playing with us like the fabled gods of old lores. Seems like such a human natured God
@@J1WE Murad claimed that this word has no meaning of remove. He lied. All classical Arabic dictionaries testify that Naskh means remove. He lied to you.
@@J1WE That invisible donkey, cp?...ha ha ha 6 years ago I wanted to open a channel like CP, where I wanted to speak CRAP about Pagan Pauline Xtianity and read the verses of your corrupted bibles and highlight all the Filth, Porn, Incest, Adultery, Rape, Myths, Absurdities, etc....and was refrained by my Islamic teachers... CP IS FINISHED as he is afraid to show himself and debate - a coward!!!
The sense of many words in the quran has been totally altered to fit the "standard islamic narrative" created later by the abbassid caliphs. As an obvious example, the "mushrikuns" so often cited in the quran, often translated as "polytheists" or "associators" or "idolaters" refer in fact to christians who believe in trinity (meaning that they give "associates" to God, which is considered in islam to be the worse sin called "shirk") ... and not at all to so-called "pagans" or "idolaters" from Mecca. Moreover historians have established that there was no more polytheism in Arabia in the 7th century as most Arabs, especially in cities, had been christianized. So there could be no "polytheists" in Mecca. Therefore the famous "verse of the sword" (quran 9:5) " kill the "mushrikuns" wherever you find them..." means "kill the christians wherever you find them ..."
Yahweh is known as "the beginning and the end". God is known as "without beginning and without end". So, how did Yahweh end up tricking everyone into calling him God?
It's funny how you people think foolishly. Why don't you just focus on the video and learn? Yahweh you said is (known as) the beginning and the end! But God is (known as) without beginning and without end! Why are you confused for no reason you clearly said (Known as). My question for you is what is the meaning of Yahweh?
YHVH NOT Yahweh (a 19th century academic German mis-interpretation.) Easy: God exists outside of time. God created time. Aleph & Tau means ALL things, not ending as in ceasing. 🙏
According to the Biblical book Songs of Solomon, the covenant was transferred from the דּוֹדִֽים dwdym (David's people or the Jews - Songs 5:1) to the מַחֲּמַדִּים mhmdyim (Muhammad's people - Songs 5:16). (Both words are Hebrew masculine, plural NOUNS which the Christian translators have rendered as the adjective, lovely in their translations to hide the transfer of the covenant.). The Hebrew plural, masculine nloun suffix 'ym' is used to denote the people of the nation to which the proper noun refers as in מּוֹאָבִים (Moabym or Moabites), Ammonites or Amonym עַמֹּנִים, Egyptians or Musrym מִּצְרִים, Chaldeans or Chasidym כַּשְׂדִּים, Lydians or Lydym לוּדִים etc. The words mhmdym and dwdym are unique and only used once each in the entire Bible. So, one expects the translation to also be unique. The words dwdym and mhmdym constitute a synonymous parallelism which references the covenant relationship between these 2 peoples. The dwdym or Jews were the last ancient Semitic people to hold this covenant before it was transferred to the mhmdym or the Muslims who were and are Muhammad's people. In addition, the Palestinians are the original Jews as they carry the haplotype J1c3d. The Ashkenazi who control Palestine are not Semites. So, Palestinians, the native inhabitants for more than 5000 years, are the rightful owners of Palestine according to history, genetics and the bible. The control of the land of Israel was based on the contingency that those bound by the covenant would obey the law (Torah) and worship the One, True God. According to the Bible, the Jews failed to abide by the covenant conditions. The last straw was when they attempted to murder the Prophet, Jesus (as). Matthew 21:43 has Jesus declare: "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." So, it is clear that Jesus confirmed the prophecy in Songs 5 and the covenant was taken from the dwdym (David's people) and given to the mhmdym (Muhammad's people). The Mhmdym (Muslims) fulfilled the messianic expectations of the Jews when they created an empire that stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. The Mhmdym also rebuilt the former temple as Masjid Al Aqsa on the site which the Christian had deliberately defiled to dishonor the Jews and their god, Yhwh. Songs is an allegory with many different levels of meaning. The poem is symbolic. The groom is symbolic of the king who ruled Judah, and who was a member of the dwdym or David's people. The bride represents the people of the covenant. The love between the spouses represents the covenant. Dwdym (David's people) represents the original people of the covenant or Jews. The Mhmdym represent the people of Muhammad to whom the covenant is transferred when the bride addresses her groom as Muhammadim or the people of Muhammad.. The bride, who is symbolic of the people of the covenant, switched her allegiance from the king who was both the ruler of and a member of the dwdym (David's people) to the Muhammadim (Muhammad's people) because the Muhammadim were the recipients of the new covenant. The covenant was transferred to the Mhmdym because the Jews rejected Jesus and his message. This new covenant was the means through which Allah (swt) made Muhammad the founder of a nation whose empire stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea. The achievements of the Muhammadim fulfilled the messianic expectations of the Hebrews. Songs is a prophecy that the Law or Torah was to be expressed through a covenant between the deity and the people who were committed to the purified Torah which became known as the Shariah, the law or Torah of the Muslim ummah. Allah's (swt) promises are always true, Subhanallah.
Do you know Hebrew then the same word is used on five other places and it makes no sense listen to Song of Solomon 5 v 16 from Jewish scholars. Also Quran says you find in the Torah and Injeel not in prophets or writings. So no Mohamed in the writings and prophets.
The covenant was made with Abraham through Isaac Jacob not any other. The blessing to the whole world is through Isaac and Jacob. Add nothing else Mohamed is not from Abraham..ishmael
the Quran contains many contradictions, when Islam is not in a state of force (like in early Mecca) then Allah says kind and tolerant things (so-called Meccan surahs like 2:256 "no compulsion in religion")... but when Islam is in force (like in Medina), then Allah becomes evil and intolerant (Medinese surahs like 9:5 "kill the infidels/polytheists")... To resolve these contradictions, Islamic doctrine consists of "abrogating" the nice Meccan surahs and replacing them with Medinan surahs... To truly "reform" Islam we would have to do the opposite, ie abrogate the "Medinese" and replace them with the nice "Meccans". Then we will have to tackle the hadiths, tafsir and sira... a huge job... unless we abrogate everything
Hmm... there is a correlation even in the English language between the word 'sign' and 'inscribe'. To sign (a signature) is to inscribe one's name or initials, isn't it? To engrave words, alphabets, or characters is akin to inscribing intelligible signs on some hard surface. It's been my observation of myself as a Christian and others too when we are caught up in words how we can't seem to glean meaning from certain passages in the Bible until we seek the mind of Christ and then the meaning comes through even when reading a poor translation. In this case, I do derive meaning from the passage, Surah 22 verse 52 that the human (Mohammed?) is fallible but that the omniscient God is powerful and faithful to His word.
We'll be recording more as we have the time. So far, only 5 have been recorded, as we go through chapter 2 and then eventually move on to chapter 3. But even those 5 examples already prove that where the Qur'an has been changed the meaning, as well as the doctrine and beliefs at times changes as well, which throws out any notion that the Qur'an has been preserved perfectly, without any letter or word, as Muslims still continue to claim. So, be patient.
@@pfanderfilms You are deliberately misrepresenting muslims. Which muslim agrees with your made up definition of the Quran? You are forcing your definition on them. You use this deliberate misrepresentation to try to strawman muslims. Did Jesus tell you to lie or to be honest?
*NO TRINITY* *Matthew* *7: 13,14* *14 Go in through the narrow gate; for WIDE is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth unto DESTRUCTION, and MANY are they which go in thereon.14 For the gate is NARROW, and the strait is the way, which leadeth unto LIFE, and FEW there be that find it.* *A.* *Timothy* *2: 4,5* *4 GOD wants all people to be saved and to know the TRUTH. 5 For there is one GOD, and one MEDITATOR between GOD and men, the MAN CHRIST JESUS;* *Revelation of John* *3:14* *14 And unto the angel of the church in Laodicea write; Thus saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness. the beginning of the CREATION of GOD.* "ARE MANY" who will follow the path of loss but "A FEW" will find the narrow gate. Mattew 7:13 John 3:13 (Jesus said)No one ascended into heaven. but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which was from the heaven. Why do we grow old and die? GOD did not want humans to die. Our first parents, Adam and Eve, were created with a perfect mind and body.They could still be alive today.This is clear from what God said to Adam about a tree growing in the garden of Eden. God said to Adam:“The day you eat [from the tree] you will surely die.” Genesis 2:17. This command would have been meaningless if Adam had been created to grow old and die. Adam knew that if he did not eat from that tree, he would not die. GOD'S PURPOSE WAS NOT THAT PEOPLE DIE. God said to Adam:"Eat your bread with the sweat of your brow until you return to the ground from where you were taken.for you were dust and you will become dust. ” Genesis 3: 17-19 As a result,“all the days of Adam's life were nine hundred and thirty years and he died.”Genesis 5: 5. Adam did not go to heaven or hell.Or live in a spiritual realm. What is the Resurrection? The Bible's answer In the Bible,the Greek word translated "resurrection" means "to stand" or "to restore." The resurrected person is resurrected from the dead and is the same person who was before. 1 Corinthians 15:12, 13. It is true that the word "resurrection" is not found in the Hebrew Scriptures,which are known as the Old Testament, but the promise of resurrection is there.For example,through the prophet Hosea,God promised:“I will rescue them from the hand of the grave, and I will rescue them from death.” Hosea 13:14; Job 14: 13-15; Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12: 2, 13. Where will people be resurrected? Some people will be resurrected to live in heaven.There they will reign with Jesus Christ. 2 Corinthians 5: 1; Revelation 5: 9, 10.The Bible calls this resurrection "the first resurrection" and the word "first" makes it clear that there will be another resurrection. Revelation 20: 6 That other resurrection will be for the living on paradise earth, and most of the dead will be resurrected in this way. Psalm 37:29. How are the dead raised?God gave Jesus the power to resurrect the dead. John 11:25. Jesus will bring to life “all those in the memorial tombs,” each with his own personality, attributes, and memories. John 5:28, 29. Some will be resurrected to live in heaven, while others will be resurrected to live on paradise earth with perfect and healthy bodies. Isaiah 33:24; 35: 5, 6. 1 Corinthians 15: 42-44, 50 They multiply priests and saints with sad faces pile up, perform miracles,cast out demons.But Jesus said,The tree is known by its fruit. MATTHEW 7: 21-23: 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.22 Many will say to me in that day,'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name,and cast out demons in your name,and did many miracles in your name?'23 Then i will tell them plainly that I did not know you at all.Get away from me, you workers of iniquity. Matthew 7: 15-20 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 By their fruits ye shall know them.Do they gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles?17 So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;and an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.20 Ye shall know them by their fruits. B.LETTER TO CORINTHIANS 11: 13-15: 13 For such are the apostles, liars, deceitful workers, impersonating the apostles of Christ.14 And it is not surprising. because Satan also takes the form of a bright angel.15 Wherefore, it is not a great thing that his ministers should be likened unto the ministers of righteousness. Their end will be in proportion to their deeds. 4: 4. In whom is the god of this world? (Satan) blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the light of the glory of the gospel of Christ might not shine upon them, which is the image of God. Eternal life is a free gift from God. The eternal punishment is not righteousness because how many years can a human beeing live at most?God is Love Bible answers Ecclesiastes 3:19,20 19 for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals,they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies, and they all have but one life. So man has no superiority over animals,(No additional soul. Only have additional knowlege,thinking,talking,etc...)verything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust. John 5:28,29 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment. Psalm 37:29 it's clear A. LETTER TO TIMOTHY 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,the man Christ Jesus! Mattew 24:36 36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father. *NO TRINITY* *John* *20:17* 17 *Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.* *JOHN* *6:38* *(Jesus said)* 38 *For I came down from heaven, not to do mine OWN will, but the will of HIM that sent me.* *John* *14:28* 28 *Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.* *Matthew* *20:23* 23 *And HE saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of MY cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not MINE to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my FATHER.* *John* *5:30* 30 *I can of MINE own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not MINE own will, but the will of the FATHER which hath sent ME:* *John* *17:20**-23* *(ONE IN GLORY)* 20 *Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on ME through their word; 21 That they all may be ONE; as THOU, FATHER, art in ME, and I in THEE, that they also may be ONE in US: that the world may believe that THOU hast sent ME. 22 And the glory which thou gavest ME, I have given them; that they may be ONE, even as we are ONE: 23 I in THEM, and THOU in ME, that they may be made perfect in ONE; and that the world may know that thou hast sent ME, and hast loved THEM, as THOU hast loved ME:* TRINITY ARE FALSE TEACHINGS only thrue Lord God is *JEHOVAH* (the Father)and his first creation is *JESUS CHRIST*(the Son) everything else created by *JESUS* more scripture prooves *NO TRINITY*
I can’t thank you two enough! This narrative of perfect preservation was the perfect dream. Stolen writings teachings then you steal the prophets and attack the children of Abraham for 1400 years. How does this make sense?
@@canonjean-mignon4985 The greatest life ever lived. Their isn’t a greater sacrifice that one could make for another. I know that it is a part of Islamic teachings to push that narrative about the crucifixion. But if you care to understand it better. Please research it. I don’t speak from ignorance or blind faith. I speak from knowledge attained. God bless you and thank you for your response. By now I expect it each time I comment on anything critical of Islam. It’s too bad that Islam teaches to question is something ugly. Christianity was the birth of great knowledge on our planet. In Christianity we can question without being attacked. In Christianity we can leave without being killed. I think those two things are humane. I believe it encourages freedom not forced obedience. Why do you think the migration path is away from Islamic countries to Christian countries? Freedom my friend! Freedom that is found in Christ which effects both our society and laws. Where are the human rights in Islam? In Sharia? Where my brother? God bless you! I pray for your continued growth and understanding. 🙏🏽😇
Hi Jay, I wish to have your paper on " the 10 questions that muslims use" ( not exact title), I sent my requirement to brother Al Fadi, but did he read it?? I will send you the session name. Hopefully you will know what I want. My family is Catholic one but my daughter has muslim husband.So there are thinks to solve. Your paper would help me. Thanks.
its all a smoke screen to justify or hid all the nonsense in the quran but it also exposes them that the quran is not as perfect as they teach it is but needs to abborgate to justify and explain things very revealing information
Wery important is that Almighty God knews what you and him tallking.Almighty Gog will judge you both by that. You don't have guts to talk to Paul Williams or Yusuf Estes (ex Christian priest) about Islam.You can watch that on RUclips anyway.
paul williams is just a hoax, someone just creating his own very personal version of islm. His is lam is very unique and has nothing to do with the real islam.
🤣🤣Yusuf estes had seizure just before he accepted islam so no wonder he were mad enough to accept it. How can anyone possible enter the cult if you got a brain and is conscious?
I Disagree with your premise. That the Bible views, "anything good comes from God and anything Bad from the Devil" (Book not Zealot interpretation). PROOF = The story of Job has God consulting the Devil. And then directing him to torment/torture Job. So Quran and Bible agree. Strange how many similarities there are between Quran and the Bible.
The Quran was revealed to the prophet Mohammed PBUH in Arabic by Allah through the Angel Gibreel PBUH and it is the only true word of Allah to mankind that hasn't been corrupted and that's why Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. As for your man in a shadow he's just another liar.
We have no evidence of any m0hammad in a cave receiving revelations inside non-islamic sources. There exist nothing, its just empty air, dust and wishful thinking.
JAY SMITH, The book of the New Testament doesn't deserve to be called the holy book of Christians, because there is no story about Christianity in it. The New Testament book only contains about Jesus'activities with the people of ISRAEL or Jews, nothing at all about Jesus'activities with Christians There are six christian words in the New Testament, but they have nothing to do with Jesus. The New Testament book is more deserve called as the book of the people of ISRAEL.
@@bentajay2026 So that you don't be stupid, then read the new Testament with common sense. Jesus sent his disciples only to the people of ISRAEL, but your uncle Paul commanded to the whole nation. MATTHEW 10: 5-6 5. These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL. ACTS 16: 6-7 6. Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in ASIA. 7. After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not. Try to explain what Paul' relationship with Jesus? Paul claimed to be an apostle, while Paul was not one of the 12 disciples of Jesus.
Murad, you are telling good things, but you misunderstand because your logic is not correct. 22:52 The devil in this verse is Moses. because Moses copied the book of Noah. Taplets that Moses left on the ground are the tapes on which Noah's book is written. So there is no mistake in the explanation of the Quran, your understanding is wrong
Great effort, but the approach is completely wrong, the word "homonyms" does not ring a bell? of course" nasakha" means copy but it also means abrogate ,nullify. the arabic language is a very rich language ,you will find tens of words meaning the same thing and many same words having different meanings. and about the word "Aya" i am not with the existing translation that hold on one word "SIGN" , but in the common arabic (and most pertinent in this case) AYA means " uncommon creative action " "عمل ابداعي متميز " .You are doing the same thing you are criticizing , taking only one meaning for a certain word and implementing it everywhere. I am not a scholar nor a researcher ,but Arabic is my native language and I feel your explanation uncomfortable. I am not biased to the Quran because I am Christian , but the matter of the arabic language is an arduous road and cannot be taken so lightly . Thank you and keep on the good job.
Msg for muslims in arabic a word can have many meanings. the meaning of a arabic word in a sentence depends upon grammer and position of word in that sentence this guy murad is deceiving the audiance by using a meaning which doea not fit the grammer and position of that word in a verse.
@@nemesis1291 he did not showed any thing all he is talking is sence less ALLAH cursed shatan in all other verses of Quran how can he incribe satan words in 22:52 so the other meaning of wrod will be used murad uses a meaning which do not fit in the sence of sentence and say QURAN is wrong. we say there is an other meaning which fits in the sence of sentence use that QURAN is not wrong. he delebrately translate it worngly. so his translation is wrong.
The translation differ from different translaters very slightly but have the same meaning but why is it big issue for you about quran and our riligion and why don't you sort matters out in your religion for a start why have you got more than one bibles
All classical Arabic dictionaries are clear about this word. This word nasakha means annulled or cancelled. He is committing the fallacy of equivocation. Murad is the dumbest of all on this channel.
Murad claims to be an expert in the Arabic language. He forgets that the Arabic language is transmitted by muslims. All earliest literature and grammar books in the Arabic language is from muslims. He relies on this transmission for Arabic. The Arabic that clearly teaches that Nasakha means annulled or cancelled.
The confidence with which he tries to sell this fallacy and crap. He also lied that evil doesn't come from god in the bible. The biblical god deceives people. He also created satan.
Shaykh Morad, Ezzayak ya m3allem. Are you an arabic teacher or what? Arabic is richer than what you are trying to show wrongly here. Jay, if Murad is your reference then I think you got the wrong reference. Whatever he is trying to explain is wrong because he's using translation to interpret a translation. That's not how arabic or Quranic text are interpreted. Murad, you don't know arabic. Murad, I'm pretty sure that you read the Bible in arabic and not in it's original language. Everyone knows that Jesus' language was Arameic, so why is the Bible not in Arameic? Does the Arameic language exists anymore? The New Testament was written in Koine Greek, so why are Christians reading multiple versions of translations in english? If Christians loved Jesus, whom they pretend is God, why wouldn't they preserve His language at least? Why wouldn't God preserve his language? Why would they use another language (koine greek) to write it? (What you read is narrations and stories reported by John, Luke, ....) Why would christians use a language (english), that never existed at the time of Jesus, to read the Bible? Quran was revealed in arabic, scribed in arabic, read in arabic, by arabs and non-arabs, worldwide, since the 7th century? It has been read and written in arabic for more than 1400 years. Christians gave up Jesus' language 65 years after his death. How would you interpret that? Wake up!!! Those who you mentioned don't know arabic (dawah group), they know better than you do cause they actually use classic arabic, which is a lot harder for anyone to learn.
Thanks for your comment and how well spoken it was. I have never heard of Saint Murad until just now, so I will only comment on your point regarding languages and God. Many Muslims express concern regarding the Bible’s language and translation, however this is purely Muslim framing. We Christian’s have no issue whatsoever with reading the Bible in our own language - in fact we are often quite happy that we can read the Bible in our own language. Almost all of the New Testament was written in Greek. This is because Greek was the ‘lengua franca’ at the time. It was the language that was most universal in the Eastern Roman Empire. And because Christ came not just for the Jews but for the gentiles too, the Bible being more accessible is a necessity. We Christians can worship God in any language - be it Greek or Latin or English or Latin. Some Christians may wish to learn Ancient Greek or Hebrew if they would like to read the ancient manuscripts, but there is no compulsion to do so in Christianity. We can pray to God in any language and now thanks to the remarkable sacrifice of the lamb of God, Jesus Christ, the tarnishing dividing line of sin is no longer! We can know God truly and genuinely! What a joy! I hope you have found my comment helpful in answering your question. God be with you and take care.
@@JothamBate Thank you for taking the time to reply. So what I humbly understand is that Christianity is accessible to everyone in any language and anyone can pray using any language. That's great, so is islam. But in Islam, muslims pray 5 times a day (in arabic). Does that make it less accessible? It makes muslims (including converts) to become closer to God. It makes muslims respect the language in which the Quran was revealed by God. It keeps the language and the book that was revealed preserved in it's language forever. It's the universal language of the Quran. Imagine if people used their own language to make those 5 prayers worldwide instead of using it's universal language, or read the Quran in their languages. People can always ask God anything in their own language, but it is better to ask in arabic out of respect. God understands all languages. But He chose arabic for the last message sent to human beings. It's to remind all the people of the book (jews and christians mainly) what they have forgotten and teach them through the comforter that God sent after Jesus, as it is mentioned in the Gospel according to John. God knew that they will forget and that they will need guidance. Speaking of the language of the Bible is not a purely Muslim framing. It's partly the truth that Christians hate to hear unfortunately.
The Quran claims to be perfectly clear. Many suras begin with an untranslatable group of letters, untranslatable because NOBODY knows what they mean. Is that not a flaw?
@@richardokeefe7410 no it is not flaw these letters meanings are known by Allah and prophet Muhammad peace be upon only and we have no problem with this so what is the problem these letters give you and tell me has your god at one time been smaller than man weaker than man I mean Jesus you believe in has a god
@@nazamhussain289 Mohammad is your God. You fail to acknowledge that. Even if you are a good Muslim, if you don't accept Mohammad was the last and the seal of the prophets, you cannot go to Heaven. Why should such an importance be given to a mere man? Why should my eternity be decided by my acceptance or non- acceptance of another man's prophethood? It is nothing but deification of a man. Come on, Christians are honest in claiming divinity for Jesus, Muslims are dishonest in claiming Mohammad as a man, but deifying him.
@@arulsammymankondar30 your thinking is wrong about our prophet Muhammad peace be upon him we believe that he is human and prophet of Allah and we believe that Allah is the creator of every thing and he has no beginning and no ending the everlasting the owner of the heaven and hell and tell me what has your gods have created and don't lie
@@arulsammymankondar30 by the way it is not the command of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him about what you are saying but it is Allah's command that he has got very special status above every thing and we honour that
As the Quran writers made wrote in the Quran several times: "Allah is the best of deceivers."
We also know him as the father of all lies, the murderer from the beginning. Excellent presentation.
Most knowledgeable and indepth voice of the subject.
A dictionary of only quranic words with their Aramaic/other roots. Kudos to The Great Murad!!
God bless you my brother for bringing out the truth.
Prayers for you gentlemen and thank you for all you do for God Allmighty 🙏✝️🕊
Everytime you expose more flaws in Islam, you are helping the world and enabling people to turn to Christ.
God bless you.
@Forgiving Fragrance "They" being whom?
Islam is not a "they". And Jay & Murad are no liars.
@@ambassadorkees
Jay is a habitual liar who practices the C1-6 LIES AND DECEPTION taught in missionary school.
See for yourself: ruclips.net/video/HLPFVzJxOh4/видео.html
@@ambassadorkees ___ I would not use the word "EXPOSE". From my point of view, there simply was a SPLIT between 'trinity folks' and folks of OTHER theological schools regarding how to conceive of the 'godhead'.
As with layers at an archaeological dig site, with the 'theological excavation', one has to dig down through the generations came and went, with includes a natural altering of the original texts, due to language evolutions.
I do not see 'conspiracy'; I do not see 'good guys versus bad guys' religions.
Happy Ramadan everybody.
Love to you all.
@@ambassadorkees people wouldn’t turn to Christ. Because islamic traditions require a certain amount of faith to be accepted? It’s the exact same thing with christianity. People will only turn to Christ, if a statue of Jesus was put into the Kaaba, a sun-cross put on top of it for everyone to see and muslims were being depraved of basic human rights. Get real dude.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 Not sure what's your background, and how you see the contents of this channel, but I find your reaction 99% incomprehensible.
Maybe I'll express myself in more detail.
Elaborating:
- Islam is full of factual flaws
- Islam lacks historical backgrounds (that it claims to have)
- Islam has demonstrably plagiated heaps of apocryphical or heretical jewish & christian texts, without understanding what these faiths are about
- Islam claims to be monotheistic, but the reverence to Muhammad and all the actions in the hadj demonstrate the opposite
- Islam's most eaamplary person was a killing, child abusing, sex-addicted, illiteral, slave trading caravan robber.
- Islam's traditions of clothing, feasting (Ramadan), Jihad, degredation of women, slavery, racism and denial of education is a disaster to humanity
Now: *Jay, Murad and many others do a great job exposing all these problems with Islam, accellerating the avelange of apostacy.
Once people are out of Islam, they may or may no open their heart to Jesus*
Exposing Islam thus enables adhering to christianity, which:
- Doesn't have (that many) factual flaws
- Is strongly rooted in actual history
- Is original in it's views
- Uses jewish long established scripture as-is, without distortion, only giving consistently a clear fulfilling meaning to many of the things Jews were expecting to happen.
- Is monotheistic in that GOD is one entity. The 3 persons within the entity doesn't change that. No other messengers, rocks, buildings, wells or whatever are revered (except by roman catholics, which is to be considered a heracy)
- Has an examplary person that was meak, compassionate, healing, helping, teaching, literate, ready to bring sacrifices.
- Calls for freedom of expression, healthy habits, an end to slavery and racism, equal rights (not roles though), and calling to investigate, leading to eventually health care, social care, universities etc etc.
Great stuff by Murad. It fits in nicely with my latest video series. The fact that all these new puzzle pieces do fit shows that we‘re on the right track.
I'm loving the convergence. Very good sign.
It's good to see that we are all on the 'Same Page', and moving towards the same direction!
Wow! The word RESTORATION comes to mind, as all of your slowly tease out the original words. Thank you, so much.
Sorry to disappoint you, but Murad is either lying or ignorant in Arabic, though he is native Arabic speaker.
.The Arabic word نسخ in ancient time meant erases or lift or eliminate. You can go to any Arabic dictionary and you will see the meaning. Now people uses it a bit little differently , but there are a lot of words in ancient times used in certain way and in modern time they are used differently. Take from example the word gay just 50 years ago it meant happy, now if you ask the younger generations about gay, the only thing that get in their minds is homosexuals and will have hard time to try to think it means also happy or joy. It is the same thing for Murad, the word نسخ meant something in the past and now it meant another totally different thing and that why Murad is having hard time to understand that it means also abrogation.
@@mahmoodali1533
Murad is a clown. The self pro claimed anonymous Egyptian who claims to be an authority over classical Arabic dictionaries.
Absolutely stunning - God bless you Murad and yours. God bless you Dr Smith and yours.
It is stated in the bible that God put a lying spirit into the mouth of the prophets and makes them prophesy lies.
Subhanallah, St. Murad may Allah reward you for all your efforts to translate his book accurately. Inshallah we will get to read it soon. Im going to start watching your channel too for the next exciting episodes that follow. Alhumdulillah!
lol
Ameen ha ha ha
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Another excellent presentation. Praise the Holy Spirit for showing us the truth. Thanks Saint Murad and Dr. Jay.
I have subscribed to brother saint Murad his work is really important
One of the things which annoys me the most when reading English translations of the Quran are the very many [parentheses]!
It also doesn't hurt you to know that they added it much later to the text to make it more "readable" but it is just plain messy with/without it
@Gavin James, when we are told that the Quran is the direct word of Allah given to Mohammad.......... it begs the question, why? Who cannot speak? Allah or Mohammad? Abu Bakr? Zayd ibn Thabit? Umar ibn al Khattab? Uthman bin Affan? Ali ibn abi Talib? Abu Musa al Ash'ari? Ubay Ibn Ka'b? Abdullah ibn Masood? Zayd Ibn Thabit? Abu Hurairah? Abdullah Ibn Abbas? Abu al-Darda? I understand that Arabic is very different to the Language's that the Quran is translated into..... but words are missing out! Not even 7th century Arabian people left words out of a sentence, "The cat sat on the [Mat]" and the Arabic of the 7th century is very different from the Arabic of the 8th, 9th, and 21st century! It's become a jumbled mess with some of it unable to be translated because no one knows what it actually means! Just very weird! Then we are told that some chapters are missing! Whole chapters! With Islam's love for abrigation, perhaps the missing chapters abrigate the chapters that we know of?
@@joseywales3789 It isn't so much that words are left out of the Quran (translations) as such, but words (typically names, epithets, and son on) are added. Of course there are different styles of translation, but I prefer transliterations. However, as you rightly state, the meanings of words (and hence the context of the text itself) have often been lost. Thankfully, the lost meanings may yet be rediscovered and a truer interpretation and translation may become possible one day.
@@gavinjames1145
Word for word translation doesn't exist.
If Murad finds this a problem. He should reject every translation of every book.
@@alonzoharris6730
Adding words that change the meaning is plain wrong.
WOW Murad ! And really all what you saying is 100% right I also when I read Quran in English I really feel the deception of Nonsense of Translators!!
Have you tried to translate the speeches of Hitler from German to English with a preconceived mentality that he was Xtian?
The point is, with any preconceived idea, you can come up with a new translation to agree with your premise.
AND THIS IS WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE.
but they are all fooling themselves (Jay and Murad) as the Quran is understood in the Arabic of it's time, Classical Arabic - and Arabs since the time of Mohammad (saw) questioned everything, especially the Disbelieving Arabs and NONE had a quarrel on the words used in the Quran.
TRANSLATORS - Muslim and Non-Muslims
have the same translation and usage of key words.
EXAMPLE FROM A NON-MUSLIM with many degrees
versus a HATER OF ISLAM (Murad)
The Koran Interpreted is a translation of the Qur'an (the Islamic religious text) by Arthur John Arberry. The translation is from the original Arabic into English. First published in 1955, it is one of the most prominent written by a non-Muslim scholar.
The verse in question Quran
Arberry: And for whatever verse We abrogate or cast into oblivion, We bring a better or the like of it; knowest thou not that God is powerful over everything?
How can someone feel deception? Either You are deceived or not: deception doesn’t affect Your somatosensory system. 🐑
Hello, thank you Mourad ! Will go to your videos !
Brilliant video by St Murad.I too am waiting with bated breath and high expectations of Murad's quranic translation which will be one of a kind .Keep up the good work St Murad and thanks to Dr Jay too.
This means satan is yahweh in the bible.
Satan is called god.
Words can only have one meaning according to Murad.
@@alonzoharris6730 You always have to deflect and say something to get ATTENTION.St Murad is talking about the quran and you deflect to the Bible, you prove it unknowingly that you have no defense for your book.Let me award you the title of the best" copy paste expert" of the 21st century Alonzo.( Like your god you have more than 99 accounts...Lol) Shameful that you go to websites that spew vicious stuff against the Bible without actually exegeting.. typical abdoolian strategy.Reminds me of a dog ferociously looking for fleas.
Also the word nosakh fits you right.How about explaining surah As- Saffat 37:125 the name Baal of a pagan god written on an eternalgolden tablet al- lawh al- mahfouz????
Bangla boy enjjjjjoy ya feasting.Bless your heart.
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: @Murad/videos
As No Arabic Quran is Identical, I'd be interested in seeing a modern day translation of a Qureshi Quran like the Topkapi.
Islamic scholars have conceded that it is not the same.
A couple years ago I downloaded a free copy of the Quran. I read the entire Quran & my thought was that it was not all that radical or out of place in the modern world. I then started watching all these videos from Jay and others & realized I had a sanitized copy of the Quran. I then started to reading accurate information about the Quran & the Hadithes & got the real truth of Islam, & it ain't pretty. Islam with be gone in 50 years & the world will be a better place.
STOP YOUR LIES
You have NEVER read the ENTIRE Quran
and the LITTLE you read, SATAN BECAME YOUR TEACHER (Jay)
@@Oxygen11115 Deceived by the devil? I haven't seen Mohammad around so I don't think so.
@@sheikhboyardee556
Admit it - you were deceived by the devil!!!
@@Oxygen11115 Not my Bible, it's God's Bible.
@@aaabrams1889 No, I'm not a Muslim. I don't worship Satan.
Great Explanation of the many different ways that the Perfectly Preserved Holey book's words are manipulated. The Religion of Abrogation, Confusion, and Let me Explain! In conclusion one word can mean whatever they want it to mean depending on the argument! The qur'an is still Evolving! Great Job! God Bless you Both!
Are you that gullible to believe HATERS OF ISLAM on Islam?
Have you got no sense?
IN ANY LANGUAGE
One word have different meanings and the way you choose the synonym is according to the context.
When the Quran was revealed, it sets how the Arabic language should be used.
@@aaabrams1889 Hate? Stop Crying! Hate is someone leaving islam and getting killed for it! Hate is killing a Teacher because she had a dream and she told her students and they decided that she said something bad about momo that's hate! That is what you should be condemning! If you make a claim you should be able to Defend it! You don't see Christians calling you guys Hateful when you attack our beliefs! Stop being a hypocrite! Leave that Victim Mentality it's getting Old! Good day sir!
If we need to determine a word's meaning by first understanding its context, then doesnt that mean the vocabulary in the language itself is not perfect? You're implying that a supreme god revealed its perfect messages on an imperfect language?
Pausing half way! Will be back.
am waiting your accurate translation of Quran from you brother Murad and also Lord bless you all Dr. Jay your passion and strength is tremendous
Excellent! Truth will always expose the darkness of lies.
St. Murad radi allahu anhu is a mercy for mankind. Thanks Jay for bringing this to us 😍😍
I like what Murad is trying to do and I am sympathetic to his thesis. That said, as a bit of constructive criticism, I would like to throw in a word of caution about his stated translation philosophy. One cannot in general take a word in one language and always translate it by a single word in another language because words have a semantic range and so can mean different things in different contexts, and it is rare that a word's semantic range in one language will be identical to the semantic range in a single word in another language. So in English the word "strike" can mean to hit, but in other contexts can mean delete (strike that line), or to go out on a work stoppage in a labor dispute, or with the word "out" can mean to miss hitting a ball for the third time in a baseball game, or to initiate something (strike up a tune), or ignite something (strike a match), or to make or ratify something (strike a deal) and so forth. As a noun strike can mean a blow, a work stoppage, knocking down ten pins in a bowling game, not hitting a ball in baseball, etc. I doubt there is a single word in Arabic that can mean all of these things, so different Arabic words would have to be used translate different contextual meanings of "strike." What I think Murad is actually trying to say is that translators are rendering two words in the abrogation verse with meanings that are not otherwise attested in the Quran (or any other ancient Arabic) where a well-attested, common meaning of the two words in the Quran makes perfectly good sense and, if the well-attested meanings are adopted, that explodes the abrogation interpretation. In such cases the burden of proof is on the translator adopting an unattested, conjectural meaning for a word where there is a well-attested alternative.
Isn’t it true that in English, for some, the same word changes in meaning across time?
@@I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid True of all languages. This is why taking a meaning from modern English is dangerous when reading archaic English. The same applies to using modern Arabic to read the Quran. Murad's method of developing a dictionary based on attested meanings in the Quran rather than later commentary makes good sense. On the other hand as a native speaker of Arabic he needs to be careful not to read his own modern Arabic meanings into Quran words. If he can limit himself to meanings that can be derived from the Quran itself or ancient Arabic that would be great .
@@joesprinkle
What does attested meaning even mean?
Murad choice of translation is also based on a meaning transmitted by people. Language doesn't exist by itself. Language is transmitted by people from generation to generation.
Murad relies on muslims for meanings of Arabic words.
He could never have known the meaning of Nasakh without early muslims who wrote books about the Arabic language and classical Arabic dictionaries.
He is using double standards.
He is pretending as if meaning of words exist by itself.
That's why I find him a clown with double standards.
@@joesprinkle - like all writings, peers who care for the truth can help him correct it to which he can then print later updated editions, since he’s not claiming to be translating golden tablets himself 😉
@@alonzoharris6730 Attested in this context means you can prove that a word's meaning "existed" by a clear example in a usage in a particular text or time period. In English the word "jump" is attested in various texts from various times, but the meaning "jump" in the sense of "jumping a car" often in the winter when a battery has become too weak to turn over a starter is not attested in texts written before the time that batteries began to be used to start cars or engines. To read the old nursery rhyme "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack JUMP over the candle stick" which existed in the early 1800s as implying by "jump" some sort of electric charge as in the "jumping" of cars in the winter is to read a meaning of a word from a later time period into a text from an earlier time where that meaning is simply impossible. That is why for any ancient text it can be useful to attempt a synchronic dictionary of attested meanings of a word from that particular text along with texts from the same time period, so far as that is possible. Where usages remain unclear it is still possible to look at later (or earlier) time periods to see if an attested meaning later (or earlier) might explain a particular usage, but since words change meanings over time is preferable to derive a meaning from the same time period. This is commonly done in New Testament studies where one prefers to derive the meanings of Greek words from usages in the NT or at least the Hellenistic period around NT times rather than resorting to meanings only well-attested much earlier in classical Greek or much later in Modern Greek. It would be a useful scholarly exercise to apply that method to the Quran.
Big work, and a lot of good intentions that result in a great presentation.
Wow I immediately started searching for the word and I came across an Islamic website admitting to the false translation of the word Nasakh
This was fantastic thanks to murad and Dr Jay
I do love that session
More holes in SIN....
Brilliant work Murad !!!💫
A pity this was being done independently of Robert Spencer's "The Critical Quran".
Spencer is not a native Arabic speaker, and while I like what he has done, it is important that we get someone who at least knows the language intimately.
@@pfanderfilms That's pretty much what I meant. Although I note that nobody now living is a native speaker of *Quranic* Arabic and I've heard Arabs speak of having difficulty with it.
Once all this new information (including Murad's dictionary and translation) is properly disseminated to the middle-east and the world, islam is finished!
Thanks Murad and Dr. Jay, I thought the text is preserved perfect word for word dot by dot letter by letter!! Giggle, well it did take a long time to canonized so yes its went under lots of change as it revolved and still is revolving...
I seen a clip on Thomas channel saying there is 12,000 lies in the Quran. GBU peace..
A very clear exposition of the case. More please.
Great
Let me add my Hebrew knowledge to this.
In hebrew, Nusakh means - version/form/copy/variant
The word 'le'nase'akh' means - to phrase/rephrase.
In Rabbinic literature, there is the issue of scribal errors or different traditions of Talmudic manuscripts.
So you can often see a Rabbi writing a commentary on Talmud and sometimes he would say "this version (nusakh) makes more sense in comparison to that version (nusakh).
It is clear that the Muslims used this word in a completely different sense. Instead of the meaning referring to an innocent difference due to scribal error, or different manuscript traditions, the Muslims have changed it to mean intentional cancelation / abolishing of clear text.
P.S
The Hebrew Tanakh has also a few variants. Mostly omitted/added vowels, but never is it used to say "oh, this used to be the case but now we no longer take this into account because of 'abrogation'.
Oh really? Which hebrew tanakh are You talking about? And which rabbinic judaism? The septuigant is greek and the tanakh from the temple in Jerusalem disappeared after Titus Vespasian took it to Rome. If You’re talking about “innocent differences”, You need to point out in which book. We know from messianic judaism that whole prophecies were being updated, since the Qumran jews managed to hide the “tanakh” from the Romans. If a translated text for You is authentic, there’s only this much You can say about scribal errors, do You?
interesting thanks
Rabbi's used Arabic for Hebrew.
Hebrew is not even language.
It's just a human project of a couple individuals who used the OT to revive a language.
Is this word found in the tanakh?
@@alonzoharris6730
Hebrew is older than your language.
@@Danielst15lm
Hebrew is not a language. It has never been spoken by people.
The language of the OT is Canaanite.
What later has been written down by rabbis is a language constructed based on the Tanakh. It's a human contruct. Nobody spoke the language of the Tanakh.
They used Aramaic and Arabic to know meaning of words.
That's why you find many Aramaic and Arabic words in 'Hebrew'. Because these words don't exist in the Tanakh. The Tanakh has a limit of words.
Watch Christian prince other day he had a caller two years ago very angry he called several times, yesterday he called again and was very calm and able to except the er problems in the Qur'an...CP stated it took two years.
CP believes in three gods.
@@alonzoharris6730 And you argue for multiple gods and demi-gods.
@@wabisabi6248
I don't argue for more gods. CP believes in three gods.
You choose to deliberately not understand their doctrine of Trinity.
It's One God who manifests in three persons as
The father then
As the son
Then
As the spirit
I would like to purchase when your translation is available, Saint Murad. And present it for my Muslims friends...
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: @Murad/videos
This is excellent stuff, thank you gentlemen
most excellent
nice.
just subscried to murad
Murad is amazing.
Creating an exhaustive dictionary is a rather huge undertaking. It would be a key tool for the next step of writing a concordance. They have been one of my major go to resources for the Christian scriptures. I believe most people are not proficient in speaking our own native language. For a person to speak in complete grammatically correct sentences during a conversation isn't as common as I once thought.
Islam /the inventors of Islam also invented cancel culture
I hope Murad's translation will make the Quran readable.
I once tried reading the Quran. It was impossible for me to understand the verses, its like they literally didnt make any sense.
Because it’s scripture. You are supposed to recite it in rhythmic patterns. Do You go to church to venerate pictures wearing bermuda shorts and eating a sauerkraut hotdog? No, You dress up nicely, You probably have taken a shower, maybe put some kind of perfume on Your neck and approach others in a respectful manner. Some like to worship statues, others revere a text.
Have You ever heard christians saying that Jesus spoke to them or that they saw him? Or that Jesus lives inside of them? Muslims reading the Quran do this for the same reasons: they want to meditate themselves into higher spiritual grounds. They don’t read the Quran to understand it, just like christians don’t pray to Mary to understand something. It’s a ritual. It doesn’t make sense, because it’s not designed to make sense. It’s supposed to comfort believers.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 You are making as much sense as the quran.
@@christislord4608
The trinity makes sense?
@@alonzoharris6730 of course, the trinity makes sense 🥳
'We never send down a false sign; a true sign can only be replaced by a better sign', so we're not going to have our prophet pull a rabbit out of hat, just to prove he is a prophet, when we have parted the sea, brought the dead back to life, etc.
The translations and change from good thoughts to evil and by whom and where and when is needed. What cult influenced evil to be slid in and added to the lectionaries?
💐✝️💐🙏♥️👍
The goodness of social media. People are able to learnt the truth from all over the world. I encourage all non believers out there to read the Bible to learn the truth with an open mind. Only in the Bible you will find details if how the universe began and how it end. Prophets mean who prophesised things to come . All the prophets spoke about the coming of Jesus and it all has been fulfilled except His second coming...
Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life, the Way to Salvation. Shalom and God blessed.
Just a friendly tip, Murad. A 'dictionary' of all the words in Al Qur'an is called a 'concordance' in English.
Like to see Murad drop the diacritics as well.
In holland I know a professor who is specialized in classical early text in arabic. She, my family, wrote Iskander Arabicus.
But i do not know if she wants to translate coranic text.
A liar lies then later has to tell more lies to keep the manipulated story
Lie upon lie 🐉
Lies lead to death
@ 14:21 re good deeds and bad deeds: Job 2 10 "What? Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?"
Abrogate is Abrogated!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Your mangod says to eat his flesh and drink his blood for eternal life.
World peace starts from free strong PALESTINE 🇵🇸.....
So everyone have there own understanding as no one knows exactly what is it
Please make it chronological as the current one is not
Yes, progressive revelation, through word selection, leads to doctrinal drifting and abuses, e.g. Eph 4:14. Muslim protagonists use this abrogation ploy to win debates, while throwing the so-called quran truths under the bus.
I asked this in another thread somewhere, but I've forgotten, so what translations are the most accurate and faithful to the original that are available today, especially online. Should we go with an older version, one published before all this textual criticism became "in vogue"? Thanks! Love your work both of you. Looking forward to seeing the finished product!
I've heard that the Pickthall translation is the most faithful to the text.
Muhammad Sarwar is pretty good. One of the few translations that accurately translates "makr" as "deceiver."
Your 'accuracy' is based on your desires.
DROGE'S translation is the one we recommend, because he keeps to the literal translation of the Arabic, and doesn't try to ameliorate the meaning, as most others do, including Pickthal and Sarwar.
@@alonzoharris6730 Is that not what "makr" means?
subbed
This is why I do not buy the whole hadith books for l hear that Muslim Scholars has changed most words in the hadith
Nabataeans rituals are found at the time of Haj at kaba maca.
Like the sabbath in the bible. As the romans hated it, they abolished it
Can you elaborate on that?
This only proves the authenticity of the Holy Bible if the romans distorted the scriptures they could have scrapped off the sabbath references.
@@johnseventhday9145 the story begins earlier, when hellenistic judaism was established in Antioch, the city that’s also called the cradle of christianity. In 167 bce, they put a statue of Zeus into the hebrew temple, because they venerated pictures and not scripture. They are hermeticists - practitioners of a secret teaching about conjuring spirits and animating statues. The “greatest story ever told” is their wizardry - the historical person who really was stripped naked, whipped in public and got crucified while being alive, is Eleazar from 2 Maccabees 6. You can read about it in Josephus’ Wars of the Jews, book 5: the high priest was crucified, because he refused to pretend eating pork.
The sabbath is the written 4. commandment. The invaders didn’t recognise commandment no 1, since hellenism is what they were imposing on other nations. The sabbath is the free day for slaves and those who fought against slavery lost to the war. Perverting history doesn’t work today. The Jews survived the hostilities and don’t pay attention to a “lord” of death and the next life. They believe in god: a lord is inferior and angels are inferior to lords. The lord of christendom is Serapis. They don’t want You to know, that Emperor Hadrian explains in his letter to Servianus, that those who worshipped Serapis, called themselves christians. The christian story is mirrored in their historical records - the idea of god itself was put on its head through hermetic hellenism.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 First of all eleazar wasn't crucified he was just killed the apocryphal work does not say he was crucified second of all you are building fancies theories where are the sourecs and its obious you are a troll as many users have already answered many of your questions and you keep spamming are you a muslim who is trying to deflect from the subject of the video?
@@johnseventhday9145 Bizarre for him to be using a catholic title, since they'd be educated to a level as not to give those uninformed ideas. Reminds me of the English midlands proverb 'If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is a duck'.
What is Murad's opinion on Robert Spencer's latest book The Critical Quran.
Isn't the text correctly translated in this, Spencer's quran?
Spencer is a clown.
His book is great, but he is not a native Arabic speaker, nor a scholar on the subject, while Murad is.
@@alonzoharris6730 Harris worships Muhammed (PBRB).
It's amazing how the old testament was abrogated with new testament
That’s a foolish statement. As Dr Smith stated during this presentation, the New Testament brings ‘Progressive Revelation’, whereby for example, Jesus raises the bar in relation to the sin of adultery, in order to show the Jews that like all other sins, adultery begins IN THE HEART and actually occurs, according to Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:28, when someone looks at a woman lustfully, as in pornography. This is not abrogation, but God actually exposing the sinfulness of the human heart and that just avoiding the ACT, is no evidence of sinlessness.
Besides, the Old Testament in essence reveals God’s dealings with His chosen people THE JEWS, whereas God’s intention was always to bring His light to the Gentiles also (see Isaiah 49:6 and Book of Acts 13:47), hence the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2, which was God showing He was reversing the curse of the Tower of Babel, and making Yeshua’s salvation available to the whole world.
Where we can hv Murad Translation ?
It's a 'work in progress', so go to his site, as he will be releasing bits-and-pieces there and then will let all of us know once it is finished: ruclips.net/user/SaintMuradvideos
Hello, Please translate this into other European languages and Indian languages like Malayalam Hindi Tamil Kannada Telengu Marathi Punjabi Urdu Bengali Kashmiri etc etc and ARABIC CHINESE PERSIAN Indonesian Korean Japanese etc etc so that you can enlighten more than three and a half billion people. 🌹👍
Murad is Arabic concordance man💃🕺
Everytume murad go online their will be a problem
Deception, deception, deception. All a big drama reality tv, horror, fantasy show for this Allah. Just playing with us like the fabled gods of old lores. Seems like such a human natured God
The deception is with Murad.
@@alonzoharris6730
look at that, the devil was conjured by Islams deception. Looks like its working
@@J1WE
Murad claimed that this word has no meaning of remove.
He lied. All classical Arabic dictionaries testify that Naskh means remove.
He lied to you.
@@alonzoharris6730
have you ever called Christian Prince ?
@@J1WE
That invisible donkey, cp?...ha ha ha
6 years ago I wanted to open a channel like CP, where I wanted to speak CRAP about Pagan Pauline Xtianity and read the verses of your corrupted bibles and highlight all the Filth, Porn, Incest, Adultery, Rape, Myths, Absurdities, etc....and was refrained by my Islamic teachers...
CP IS FINISHED
as he is afraid to show himself and debate - a coward!!!
Hand in foot?
You mean hand in glove lol
Rabbi Singer also debunked the verses in new testament copied from old testament and changed their meaning too
The sense of many words in the quran has been totally altered to fit the "standard islamic narrative" created later by the abbassid caliphs.
As an obvious example, the "mushrikuns" so often cited in the quran, often translated as "polytheists" or "associators" or "idolaters" refer in fact to christians who believe in trinity (meaning that they give "associates" to God, which is considered in islam to be the worse sin called "shirk") ... and not at all to so-called "pagans" or "idolaters" from Mecca.
Moreover historians have established that there was no more polytheism in Arabia in the 7th century as most Arabs, especially in cities, had been christianized. So there could be no "polytheists" in Mecca.
Therefore the famous "verse of the sword" (quran 9:5) " kill the "mushrikuns" wherever you find them..." means "kill the christians wherever you find them ..."
Does abrogation mean that allahs words have changed ?
Yahweh is known as "the beginning and the end".
God is known as "without beginning and without end".
So, how did Yahweh end up tricking everyone into calling him God?
It's funny how you people think foolishly. Why don't you just focus on the video and learn? Yahweh you said is (known as) the beginning and the end! But God is (known as) without beginning and without end! Why are you confused for no reason you clearly said (Known as). My question for you is what is the meaning of Yahweh?
@@yomitech the Alpha and the Omega is "the beginning and the end". Or, are you illiterate? Don't answer. Rhetorical.
YHVH
NOT Yahweh (a 19th century academic German mis-interpretation.)
Easy:
God exists outside of time.
God created time.
Aleph & Tau means ALL things, not ending as in ceasing. 🙏
@@eswn1816 Show me the Bible verse which says God exists outside Time
@@maalikserebryakov timelessness is symmetry time is asymmetry, mind is timeless
According to the Biblical book Songs of Solomon, the covenant was transferred from the דּוֹדִֽים dwdym (David's people or the Jews - Songs 5:1) to the מַחֲּמַדִּים mhmdyim (Muhammad's people - Songs 5:16). (Both words are Hebrew masculine, plural NOUNS which the Christian translators have rendered as the adjective, lovely in their translations to hide the transfer of the covenant.). The Hebrew plural, masculine nloun suffix 'ym' is used to denote the people of the nation to which the proper noun refers as in מּוֹאָבִים (Moabym or Moabites), Ammonites or Amonym עַמֹּנִים, Egyptians or Musrym מִּצְרִים, Chaldeans or Chasidym כַּשְׂדִּים, Lydians or Lydym לוּדִים etc. The words mhmdym and dwdym are unique and only used once each in the entire Bible. So, one expects the translation to also be unique. The words dwdym and mhmdym constitute a synonymous parallelism which references the covenant relationship between these 2 peoples. The dwdym or Jews were the last ancient Semitic people to hold this covenant before it was transferred to the mhmdym or the Muslims who were and are Muhammad's people. In addition, the Palestinians are the original Jews as they carry the haplotype J1c3d. The Ashkenazi who control Palestine are not Semites. So, Palestinians, the native inhabitants for more than 5000 years, are the rightful owners of Palestine according to history, genetics and the bible.
The control of the land of Israel was based on the contingency that those bound by the covenant would obey the law (Torah) and worship the One, True God. According to the Bible, the Jews failed to abide by the covenant conditions. The last straw was when they attempted to murder the Prophet, Jesus (as). Matthew 21:43 has Jesus declare: "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." So, it is clear that Jesus confirmed the prophecy in Songs 5 and the covenant was taken from the dwdym (David's people) and given to the mhmdym (Muhammad's people). The Mhmdym (Muslims) fulfilled the messianic expectations of the Jews when they created an empire that stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. The Mhmdym also rebuilt the former temple as Masjid Al Aqsa on the site which the Christian had deliberately defiled to dishonor the Jews and their god, Yhwh.
Songs is an allegory with many different levels of meaning. The poem is symbolic. The groom is symbolic of the king who ruled Judah, and who was a member of the dwdym or David's people. The bride represents the people of the covenant. The love between the spouses represents the covenant. Dwdym (David's people) represents the original people of the covenant or Jews. The Mhmdym represent the people of Muhammad to whom the covenant is transferred when the bride addresses her groom as Muhammadim or the people of Muhammad.. The bride, who is symbolic of the people of the covenant, switched her allegiance from the king who was both the ruler of and a member of the dwdym (David's people) to the Muhammadim (Muhammad's people) because the Muhammadim were the recipients of the new covenant. The covenant was transferred to the Mhmdym because the Jews rejected Jesus and his message. This new covenant was the means through which Allah (swt) made Muhammad the founder of a nation whose empire stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea. The achievements of the Muhammadim fulfilled the messianic expectations of the Hebrews. Songs is a prophecy that the Law or Torah was to be expressed through a covenant between the deity and the people who were committed to the purified Torah which became known as the Shariah, the law or Torah of the Muslim ummah. Allah's (swt) promises are always true, Subhanallah.
Do you know Hebrew then the same word is used on five other places and it makes no sense listen to Song of Solomon 5 v 16 from Jewish scholars.
Also Quran says you find in the Torah and Injeel not in prophets or writings.
So no Mohamed in the writings and prophets.
The covenant was made with Abraham through Isaac Jacob not any other.
The blessing to the whole world is through Isaac and Jacob.
Add nothing else
Mohamed is not from Abraham..ishmael
the Quran contains many contradictions, when Islam is not in a state of force (like in early Mecca) then Allah says kind and tolerant things (so-called Meccan surahs like 2:256 "no compulsion in religion")... but when Islam is in force (like in Medina), then Allah becomes evil and intolerant (Medinese surahs like 9:5 "kill the infidels/polytheists")...
To resolve these contradictions, Islamic doctrine consists of "abrogating" the nice Meccan surahs and replacing them with Medinan surahs... To truly "reform" Islam we would have to do the opposite, ie abrogate the "Medinese" and replace them with the nice "Meccans".
Then we will have to tackle the hadiths, tafsir and sira... a huge job... unless we abrogate everything
Hmm... there is a correlation even in the English language between the word 'sign' and 'inscribe'. To sign (a signature) is to inscribe one's name or initials, isn't it? To engrave words, alphabets, or characters is akin to inscribing intelligible signs on some hard surface.
It's been my observation of myself as a Christian and others too when we are caught up in words how we can't seem to glean meaning from certain passages in the Bible until we seek the mind of Christ and then the meaning comes through even when reading a poor translation.
In this case, I do derive meaning from the passage, Surah 22 verse 52 that the human (Mohammed?) is fallible but that the omniscient God is powerful and faithful to His word.
What happened to the comparing Qur'an series ?
We'll be recording more as we have the time. So far, only 5 have been recorded, as we go through chapter 2 and then eventually move on to chapter 3. But even those 5 examples already prove that where the Qur'an has been changed the meaning, as well as the doctrine and beliefs at times changes as well, which throws out any notion that the Qur'an has been preserved perfectly, without any letter or word, as Muslims still continue to claim. So, be patient.
@@pfanderfilms
You are deliberately misrepresenting muslims.
Which muslim agrees with your made up definition of the Quran?
You are forcing your definition on them. You use this deliberate misrepresentation to try to strawman muslims.
Did Jesus tell you to lie or to be honest?
*NO TRINITY*
*Matthew* *7: 13,14*
*14 Go in through the narrow gate; for WIDE is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth unto DESTRUCTION, and MANY are they which go in thereon.14 For the gate is NARROW, and the strait is the way, which leadeth unto LIFE, and FEW there be that find it.*
*A.* *Timothy* *2: 4,5*
*4 GOD wants all people to be saved and to know the TRUTH. 5 For there is one GOD, and one MEDITATOR between GOD and men, the MAN CHRIST JESUS;*
*Revelation of John* *3:14*
*14 And unto the angel of the church in Laodicea write; Thus saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness. the beginning of the CREATION of GOD.*
"ARE MANY" who will follow the path of loss but "A FEW" will find the narrow gate.
Mattew 7:13
John 3:13 (Jesus said)No one ascended into heaven. but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which was from the heaven.
Why do we grow old and die?
GOD did not want humans to die. Our first parents, Adam and Eve, were created with a perfect mind and body.They could still be alive today.This is clear from what God said to Adam about a tree growing in the garden of Eden.
God said to Adam:“The day you eat [from the tree] you will surely die.” Genesis 2:17. This command would have been meaningless if Adam had been created to grow old and die. Adam knew that if he did not eat from that tree, he would not die.
GOD'S PURPOSE WAS NOT THAT PEOPLE DIE.
God said to Adam:"Eat your bread with the sweat of your brow until you return to the ground from where you were taken.for you were dust and you will become dust. ”
Genesis 3: 17-19
As a result,“all the days of Adam's life were nine hundred and thirty years and he died.”Genesis 5: 5. Adam did not go to heaven or hell.Or live in a spiritual realm.
What is the Resurrection?
The Bible's answer
In the Bible,the Greek word translated "resurrection" means "to stand" or "to restore." The resurrected person is resurrected from the dead and is the same person who was before. 1 Corinthians 15:12, 13.
It is true that the word "resurrection" is not found in the Hebrew Scriptures,which are known as the Old Testament, but the promise of resurrection is there.For example,through the prophet Hosea,God promised:“I will rescue them from the hand of the grave, and I will rescue them from death.” Hosea 13:14; Job 14: 13-15; Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12: 2, 13.
Where will people be resurrected? Some people will be resurrected to live in heaven.There they will reign with Jesus Christ.
2 Corinthians 5: 1; Revelation 5: 9, 10.The Bible calls this resurrection "the first resurrection" and the word "first" makes it clear that there will be another resurrection. Revelation 20: 6 That other resurrection will be for the living on paradise earth, and most of the dead will be resurrected in this way.
Psalm 37:29.
How are the dead raised?God gave Jesus the power to resurrect the dead. John 11:25. Jesus will bring to life “all those in the memorial tombs,” each with his own personality, attributes, and memories.
John 5:28, 29.
Some will be resurrected to live in heaven, while others will be resurrected to live on paradise earth with perfect and healthy bodies. Isaiah 33:24; 35: 5, 6. 1 Corinthians 15: 42-44, 50
They multiply priests and saints with sad faces pile up, perform miracles,cast out demons.But Jesus said,The tree is known by its fruit.
MATTHEW
7: 21-23:
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.22 Many will say to me in that day,'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name,and cast out demons in your name,and did many miracles in your name?'23 Then i will tell them plainly that I did not know you at all.Get away from me, you workers of iniquity.
Matthew 7: 15-20
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 By their fruits ye shall know them.Do they gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles?17 So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;and an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.20 Ye shall know them by their fruits.
B.LETTER TO CORINTHIANS
11: 13-15:
13 For such are the apostles, liars, deceitful workers, impersonating the apostles of Christ.14 And it is not surprising. because Satan also takes the form of a bright angel.15 Wherefore, it is not a great thing that his ministers should be likened unto the ministers of righteousness. Their end will be in proportion to their deeds.
4: 4. In whom is the god of this world?
(Satan) blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the light of the glory of the gospel of Christ might not shine upon them, which is the image of God.
Eternal life is a free gift from God. The eternal punishment is not righteousness because how many years can a human beeing live at most?God is Love
Bible answers
Ecclesiastes 3:19,20
19 for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals,they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies, and they all have but one life. So man has no superiority over animals,(No additional soul. Only have additional knowlege,thinking,talking,etc...)verything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust.
John 5:28,29
28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment.
Psalm 37:29
it's clear
A. LETTER TO TIMOTHY 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,the man Christ Jesus!
Mattew 24:36
36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.
*NO TRINITY*
*John* *20:17*
17 *Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.*
*JOHN* *6:38*
*(Jesus said)*
38 *For I came down from heaven, not to do mine OWN will, but the will of HIM that sent me.*
*John* *14:28*
28 *Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.*
*Matthew* *20:23*
23 *And HE saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of MY cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not MINE to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my FATHER.*
*John* *5:30*
30 *I can of MINE own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not MINE own will, but the will of the FATHER which hath sent ME:*
*John* *17:20**-23*
*(ONE IN GLORY)*
20 *Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on ME through their word; 21 That they all may be ONE; as THOU, FATHER, art in ME, and I in THEE, that they also may be ONE in US: that the world may believe that THOU hast sent ME. 22 And the glory which thou gavest ME, I have given them; that they may be ONE, even as we are ONE: 23 I in THEM, and THOU in ME, that they may be made perfect in ONE; and that the world may know that thou hast sent ME, and hast loved THEM, as THOU hast loved ME:*
TRINITY ARE FALSE TEACHINGS only thrue Lord God is *JEHOVAH* (the Father)and his first creation is *JESUS CHRIST*(the Son) everything else created by *JESUS*
more scripture prooves *NO TRINITY*
I can’t thank you two enough! This narrative of perfect preservation was the perfect dream. Stolen writings teachings then you steal the prophets and attack the children of Abraham for 1400 years. How does this make sense?
It makes just as much sense, as if someone else would die for Your sins, instead of dying, so You would not sin.
@@canonjean-mignon4985 The greatest life ever lived. Their isn’t a greater sacrifice that one could make for another. I know that it is a part of Islamic teachings to push that narrative about the crucifixion. But if you care to understand it better. Please research it. I don’t speak from ignorance or blind faith. I speak from knowledge attained. God bless you and thank you for your response. By now I expect it each time I comment on anything critical of Islam. It’s too bad that Islam teaches to question is something ugly. Christianity was the birth of great knowledge on our planet. In Christianity we can question without being attacked. In Christianity we can leave without being killed. I think those two things are humane. I believe it encourages freedom not forced obedience. Why do you think the migration path is away from Islamic countries to Christian countries? Freedom my friend! Freedom that is found in Christ which effects both our society and laws. Where are the human rights in Islam? In Sharia? Where my brother? God bless you! I pray for your continued growth and understanding. 🙏🏽😇
Murad, do you think Usama Dakdok's translation is accurate?
There is no Allah
Hi Jay, I wish to have your paper on " the 10 questions that muslims use" ( not exact title), I sent my requirement to brother Al Fadi, but did he read it?? I will send you the session name. Hopefully you will know what I want. My family is Catholic one but my daughter has muslim husband.So there are thinks to solve. Your paper would help me. Thanks.
its all a smoke screen to justify or hid all the nonsense in the quran but it also exposes them that the quran is not as perfect as they teach it is but needs to abborgate to justify and explain things very revealing information
Wery important is that Almighty God knews what you and him tallking.Almighty Gog will judge you both by that.
You don't have guts to talk to Paul Williams or Yusuf Estes (ex Christian priest) about Islam.You can watch that on RUclips anyway.
paul williams is just a hoax, someone just creating his own very personal version of islm. His is lam is very unique and has nothing to do with the real islam.
🤣🤣Yusuf estes had seizure just before he accepted islam so no wonder he were mad enough to accept it. How can anyone possible enter the cult if you got a brain and is conscious?
I Disagree with your premise. That the Bible views, "anything good comes from God and anything Bad from the Devil" (Book not Zealot interpretation). PROOF = The story of Job has God consulting the Devil. And then directing him to torment/torture Job. So Quran and Bible agree. Strange how many similarities there are between Quran and the Bible.
Too weak word has many meanings copy, scan, move, remove
The Quran was revealed to the prophet Mohammed PBUH in Arabic by Allah through the Angel Gibreel PBUH and it is the only true word of Allah to mankind that hasn't been corrupted and that's why Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. As for your man in a shadow he's just another liar.
We have no evidence of any m0hammad in a cave receiving revelations inside non-islamic sources. There exist nothing, its just empty air, dust and wishful thinking.
U are just blindly following a cult. Turn on your brain, be smart and leave this cult once and for all. Ameeem
JAY SMITH,
The book of the New Testament doesn't deserve to be called the holy book of Christians, because there is no story about Christianity in it.
The New Testament book only contains about Jesus'activities with the people of ISRAEL or Jews, nothing at all about Jesus'activities with Christians There are six christian words in the New Testament, but they have nothing to do with Jesus.
The New Testament book is more deserve called as the book of the people of ISRAEL.
Maju
Don't ACT stupid the New testament especially the letters Paul wrote are addressed to Gentiles not more than jews
@@bentajay2026
So that you don't be stupid, then read the new Testament with common sense.
Jesus sent his disciples only to the people of ISRAEL, but your uncle Paul commanded to the whole nation.
MATTHEW 10: 5-6
5. These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
6. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of ISRAEL.
ACTS 16: 6-7
6. Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in ASIA.
7. After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not.
Try to explain what Paul' relationship with Jesus?
Paul claimed to be an apostle, while Paul was not one of the 12 disciples of Jesus.
Quran full of problems
Murad, you are telling good things, but you misunderstand because your logic is not correct.
22:52 The devil in this verse is Moses.
because Moses copied the book of Noah.
Taplets that Moses left on the ground are the tapes on which Noah's book is written.
So there is no mistake in the explanation of the Quran, your understanding is wrong
Great effort, but the approach is completely wrong, the word "homonyms" does not ring a bell? of course" nasakha" means copy but it also means abrogate ,nullify. the arabic language is a very rich language ,you will find tens of words meaning the same thing and many same words having different meanings. and about the word "Aya" i am not with the existing translation that hold on one word "SIGN" , but in the common arabic (and most pertinent in this case) AYA means " uncommon creative action " "عمل ابداعي متميز " .You are doing the same thing you are criticizing , taking only one meaning for a certain word and implementing it everywhere. I am not a scholar nor a researcher ,but Arabic is my native language and I feel your explanation uncomfortable. I am not biased to the Quran because I am Christian , but the matter of the arabic language is an arduous road and cannot be taken so lightly . Thank you and keep on the good job.
This is so stupid! I've not heard anything as ridiculous as this!!
What about a prophetic paedophile?
Msg for muslims
in arabic a word can have many meanings.
the meaning of a arabic word in a sentence depends upon grammer and position of word in that sentence
this guy murad is deceiving the audiance by using a meaning which doea not fit the grammer and position of that word in a verse.
No, he explains clearly how the words are being used. Your futile attempt to discredit Mr Saint Murad only confirms that he's right.
Murad is a clown. He is committing the fallacy of equivocation.
He uses this fallacy as a criteria to force his desires onto the Quran.
@@nemesis1291 he did not showed any thing all he is talking is sence less
ALLAH cursed shatan in all other verses of Quran how can he incribe satan words in 22:52 so the other meaning of wrod will be used
murad uses a meaning which do not fit in the sence of sentence and say QURAN is wrong.
we say there is an other meaning which fits in the sence of sentence use that QURAN is not wrong.
he delebrately translate it worngly. so his translation is wrong.
@@Taimurkhan4u Allah is the shaytan of Islam.
The translation differ from different translaters very slightly but have the same meaning but why is it big issue for you about quran and our riligion and why don't you sort matters out in your religion for a start why have you got more than one bibles
Is this a joke?
"progressive relevations". Good one 😂 it's so cringy listening to you talking about christendom, Jay...
Murad is a clown.
All classical Arabic dictionaries are clear about this word. This word nasakha means annulled or cancelled.
He is committing the fallacy of equivocation.
Murad is the dumbest of all on this channel.
Murad claims to be an expert in the Arabic language. He forgets that the Arabic language is transmitted by muslims. All earliest literature and grammar books in the Arabic language is from muslims.
He relies on this transmission for Arabic. The Arabic that clearly teaches that Nasakha means annulled or cancelled.
The confidence with which he tries to sell this fallacy and crap.
He also lied that evil doesn't come from god in the bible.
The biblical god deceives people. He also created satan.
Harris worships Muhammed (PBRB).
Shaykh Morad, Ezzayak ya m3allem. Are you an arabic teacher or what? Arabic is richer than what you are trying to show wrongly here. Jay, if Murad is your reference then I think you got the wrong reference. Whatever he is trying to explain is wrong because he's using translation to interpret a translation. That's not how arabic or Quranic text are interpreted.
Murad, you don't know arabic. Murad, I'm pretty sure that you read the Bible in arabic and not in it's original language. Everyone knows that Jesus' language was Arameic, so why is the Bible not in Arameic? Does the Arameic language exists anymore? The New Testament was written in Koine Greek, so why are Christians reading multiple versions of translations in english? If Christians loved Jesus, whom they pretend is God, why wouldn't they preserve His language at least? Why wouldn't God preserve his language? Why would they use another language (koine greek) to write it? (What you read is narrations and stories reported by John, Luke, ....) Why would christians use a language (english), that never existed at the time of Jesus, to read the Bible?
Quran was revealed in arabic, scribed in arabic, read in arabic, by arabs and non-arabs, worldwide, since the 7th century? It has been read and written in arabic for more than 1400 years. Christians gave up Jesus' language 65 years after his death. How would you interpret that? Wake up!!! Those who you mentioned don't know arabic (dawah group), they know better than you do cause they actually use classic arabic, which is a lot harder for anyone to learn.
Thanks for your comment and how well spoken it was.
I have never heard of Saint Murad until just now, so I will only comment on your point regarding languages and God.
Many Muslims express concern regarding the Bible’s language and translation, however this is purely Muslim framing. We Christian’s have no issue whatsoever with reading the Bible in our own language - in fact we are often quite happy that we can read the Bible in our own language. Almost all of the New Testament was written in Greek. This is because Greek was the ‘lengua franca’ at the time. It was the language that was most universal in the Eastern Roman Empire. And because Christ came not just for the Jews but for the gentiles too, the Bible being more accessible is a necessity.
We Christians can worship God in any language - be it Greek or Latin or English or Latin. Some Christians may wish to learn Ancient Greek or Hebrew if they would like to read the ancient manuscripts, but there is no compulsion to do so in Christianity. We can pray to God in any language and now thanks to the remarkable sacrifice of the lamb of God, Jesus Christ, the tarnishing dividing line of sin is no longer! We can know God truly and genuinely! What a joy!
I hope you have found my comment helpful in answering your question. God be with you and take care.
@@JothamBate Thank you for taking the time to reply. So what I humbly understand is that Christianity is accessible to everyone in any language and anyone can pray using any language. That's great, so is islam. But in Islam, muslims pray 5 times a day (in arabic). Does that make it less accessible? It makes muslims (including converts) to become closer to God. It makes muslims respect the language in which the Quran was revealed by God. It keeps the language and the book that was revealed preserved in it's language forever. It's the universal language of the Quran. Imagine if people used their own language to make those 5 prayers worldwide instead of using it's universal language, or read the Quran in their languages. People can always ask God anything in their own language, but it is better to ask in arabic out of respect. God understands all languages. But He chose arabic for the last message sent to human beings. It's to remind all the people of the book (jews and christians mainly) what they have forgotten and teach them through the comforter that God sent after Jesus, as it is mentioned in the Gospel according to John. God knew that they will forget and that they will need guidance. Speaking of the language of the Bible is not a purely Muslim framing. It's partly the truth that Christians hate to hear unfortunately.
There are no flaws in the quran the flaws are in you and you will admit it very soon that's a guarantee
The Quran claims to be perfectly clear.
Many suras begin with an untranslatable group of letters,
untranslatable because NOBODY knows what they mean.
Is that not a flaw?
@@richardokeefe7410 no it is not flaw these letters meanings are known by Allah and prophet Muhammad peace be upon only and we have no problem with this so what is the problem these letters give you and tell me has your god at one time been smaller than man weaker than man I mean Jesus you believe in has a god
@@nazamhussain289
Mohammad is your God. You fail to acknowledge that. Even if you are a good Muslim, if you don't accept Mohammad was the last and the seal of the prophets, you cannot go to Heaven. Why should such an importance be given to a mere man? Why should my eternity be decided by my acceptance or non- acceptance of another man's prophethood? It is nothing but deification of a man. Come on, Christians are honest in claiming divinity for Jesus, Muslims are dishonest in claiming Mohammad as a man, but deifying him.
@@arulsammymankondar30 your thinking is wrong about our prophet Muhammad peace be upon him we believe that he is human and prophet of Allah and we believe that Allah is the creator of every thing and he has no beginning and no ending the everlasting the owner of the heaven and hell and tell me what has your gods have created and don't lie
@@arulsammymankondar30 by the way it is not the command of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him about what you are saying but it is Allah's command that he has got very special status above every thing and we honour that