Apparently that's it for awhile now. India, hands and heels to the line from China, with the Yanks panelled in third. Sorry, we couldn't get to the mounting yard for a look. ❤😂🤣
Yes, it was awesome but there is also something very wonky about this chart. After all, how could Japan go from a population of about a 100 million in 1935 to more than 450 million by 1943? This is particularly odd when you consider that most of the able-bodied men were off fighting a war for much of this time. And furthermore, how could the population then just suddenly drop back down to 70 million in just the two years following WW2? First of all, Japan only lost about 3-million people during the war and not 300-million. And secondly you would expect the population to drop during the war rather than right after it. It just makes no sense. Did Godzilla just get hungry and swallow up 300 million people or something? Or perhaps they are counting the populations of the countries Japan was occupying during this time period but that really does not make any sense. It would only make sense if these remained part of Japan after the war and were not merely occupied by them during the war.
I’m from Small country called Kyrgyzstan, so funny thing we were part Mongols when they where in top 2 by population , we were partly under China empire when they where top 2 , we were part of USSR when they were top 3 , but now we are small but independent country with 7 million population 🙂🇰🇬
@@MuhammadHamas They are called countries for a reason...Duhhhh. Faith has nothing to do with it. Just because the USA, Canada, United kingdom, Australia and New Zealand are all majority Christian doesn't mean they are the same country. That's a simple difference.for your head to get around.
Re Brazil: the data shown in the video was based on estimates from the 2010 census. The results from 2022-2023 census just came out and the total population is only 203 million, 10 million less than shown.
E você acredita no IBGE? Eles só fazem "estimativas"! Nunca vi um cidadão de serviço pelo IBGE no meu bairro e nem na minha cidade! E olha que moro perto da cidade do Rio de Janeiro! Só no mês de novembro nasceu 5 crianças na minha família KKKKKKK😂😂 A população brasileira deve estar beirando 240 milhões!
@@Brazilian553 Você parece fazer uma confusão entre medidas e estimativas futuras. Toda medida tem um erro, mas estimativas são extrapolações a partir informação provavelmente já datada, o que envolve níveis muito maiores de erro..
@@jeff-hd9og It will stabilize, there is a population capacity and every over populated country is expected to reach it in a couple of years. (cant be said about africa tho)
Well, 96% of Chinese population lives in just 40% of China's land area which is around 4million sqkm. India is more evenly populated with 3.3 m sqkm So i wld say its not that big of a difference
A lot of China is just uninhabited. Whereas India has people in its every part. There is not a "mind-boggling" difference between the land area of China and India. Both come in the top 7 largest countries. India looks small on the map because of Mercator's projection. India's huge on the globe.
@@Venomous6942 India is the 7th biggest country in area, but China is still 3 times as big. You're right about distribution though, a HUGE majority of China's population is in the eastern half.
Due to deep religious/cultural reasons & extremely high economic uncertainty, male offspring became the ONLY gender desired. (Rural Chinese, in fact, went so far as to MURDER their own infant girls at birth, especially after the 1970s One-Child Policy became law.)
Leaders 1600-1644: Ming Dynasty 1644-1688: Qing Dynasty 1688-1699: Mughal Empire 1699-1911: Qing Dynasty 1911-1926: Republic of China 1926-1947: United Kingdom 1947-1949: Republic of China 1949: India 1950-2023: People's Republic of China 2023 onwards: India
A Chinese dynasty/nation has been in the population lead 6 times 🏅 An Indian country has only done it twice in the time period given. So twice And then we have the British. Once with their global empire! Edit: things would have been a lot different if the raj was Independent and if the time period began in like 50 BC
Africa's poplation growing is just incredible. Also, Southeast Asia's population growing is unbelivable. The population growth of Brazil and the United States are understandable because they are basically immigrants from around of the world. But Africa and Southeast Asia, from the least populated regions in the world, became one of the most populated regions in the world by giving births. Thats just incredible.
Год назад+60
well usually poorer lest developed regions have more children so that’s also not an incredibly great thing.
@@SerCrispinColeit only increased, during British periods more than 30 million people died in famines because of British incompetence, since independence there hasn't been a single large scale famine in India
If you watch closely, you can see some of these empires lose people in a single year, that's more than the entire population of some of the countries below it.
@@1210edu not entirely accurate. There's always been a lot of wars with respective neighboring countries... just all the back and forth in border disputes between the european countries is enough material to fill several books
Before 1950 it’s normal having 15 children and become grandparents at 30’s After 1980 is normal having 1 or 2 children and become grandparents at 50’s.
Rightly said. My father's age is 63 and I am 29. Not married, no kids. This trend is emerging in India, In few years population growth rate will stabilise and then may be decline. Right now TFR in India is 2 which is lesser than replacement level 2.1. in 1960-70 TFR was 6.
@@stone-xl2nl Only because life expectancy is increasing as well. If you account for that, then it's already declining. As has been pointed out - 2.1 is replacement and most countries past a certain level of development are below that.
In the 21 century, it's normal now for kids( teens) to have kids from different boy friends, girl friends, husbands ( multiple marriages, group marriage, etc) Rather than obeying the bibles law on marriage and family. Today, as long as we receive benefits from the governments, we can " have as may kids as we want , as possible. The Western world " they courage this" since we live in very wealthy countries. Who cares, though, for how many people get sick, viruses, etc, and eventually die. No wonder it's overpopulated. Along with " samesex marriage, IVF etc etc. It's a very " sick" world.
The land and the weather conditions suits humans. Humans aren't built to live harsh cold weather that's why west people have to turn on heaters all the time so when heaters etc weren't invented people used to find places suitable for them and south Asia was a perfect match and still is.
It's interesting if you don't know anything about the climate. Do you know where the earth's climatic poles are located? There are two of them in the northern hemisphere - in Greenland (up to -70 °C) and in Russia (in Yakutia up to -70°C). In the southern hemisphere, in Antarctica (up to -90°C). The population density of Greenland is 0.03 people /km2, Russia - 8.55 people /km2 (in the region of Yakutia - 0.32 km2), Antarctica - 0. The area of Yakutia inside Russia is 3083523 km2, and few people want to move to the coldest Yakut village in the world Oymyakon, it happens there -70 ° C, but constantly there 500 people live there. Welcome!
@@edouard9867 Tumu battle between Oirats and Ming Empire. Battle of Yehuling, between Mongols and Jin Empire. Battle of Legnica, between Mongols and Europeans. Battle of Utus, between Huns and Eastern Roman Empire. All won by Turco-Mongols. There are tons of examples actually.
Very good video, not only is it shown to be accurate but also showing the new nations and empires that form with their respective territories, many other RUclipsrs just use modern borders instead of the overall empire.
You think this is accurate? Straight away chinas population didn’t decline at all even though it has in reality. All the numbers just rose and that’s it.
@@floydpulley3509 you just say this without proof is very unconvincing. besides,this data came from the self-administered goverment.meaning potentially china has more people since at that time governing was not as effecient.
@@TheAnonymousKnightOfJustice really? Because you say so? The numbers are not a representation of real life, it’s literally just made to rise at certain speeds.
Indonesia growth after independence in 1945 was massive because of term that used in that generation. And it was "Banyak Anak Banyak Rejeki" that had meaning "More Children More Fortune". It rapid growth need to reduced in early 80s by goverment with "Keluarga Berencana" or Family Plan program with 2 children per family.
If you count populations administratively, then the UK should be British Empire. And the Tokugawa Shōgunate should be Japan or Empire of Japan, depending on the period.
@@joso7228 Yes but then it dos not make sense to not take the French Empire for instance with all of their African colonies Vietnam Laos and Cambodia. I don't see the French empire of napoleon accounting for all of Europe in 1811. This is just an example of accounting inconsistencies.
For complete accuracy it should have been called the British Empire for its duration because A) It was historically called that and B) for consistency as all other Empires were described as such.
This is fantastic! While I doubt the program you use can actually do this, here’s a few hypothetical ideas I had to make this easier to follow: - Name/flag changes on the fly. Instead of “Spanish Empire (Habsburg)” decreasing to zero while “Spanish Empire (Bourbon)” races up to replace it, it could just stay where it is and only change its label. - Visually combining countries. Instead of “Kingdom of England” decreasing to zero while “Great Britain” increases from zero, imagine this: “Kingdom of Scotland” comes up from the bottom to the right, neatly slots on to the side of England, the label/flag changes to GB, and then it moves up to its new place on the list. - Visually splitting countries. Imagine this: for the dissolution of the Soviet Union, all the republics split off from the right and descend in single file down the side, the remaining part changes label to Russia, and then moves down to its new place on the list. - Visually representing changes in military occupation. For example, chunks of population would fly between “Republic of China” and “Empire of Japan” yearly as the tides of the war change. You could show migration in a similar way (if you had the data), but I would recommend against it, because it would add ambiguity when the point is to reduce it.
Super fascinating. I wish there were pop ups showing the different world events that cause some of those shifts. I guess you'd have to slow it down to show some of them.
If I had a nickel for every time an English speaking country had the world’s largest economy with the third largest population, I’d have two nickels. Not a lot, but it’s weird it happened twice.
That is interesting. The biggest population changes are, unsurprisingly, empires gained/lost and wars. The two times I noticed the USA population dip was the Civil War and WW2.
During the Civil War, the US temporarily lost control of Confederate territories. During WW2, it lost control of the Philippines (to Japan). The actual population of the US (or rather, territories currently controlled by the US) continued to grow, even during these wars.
I'm sure not a single Belgian knows that Belgium was in the top 15 of most populous countries (if one includes Congo, Rwanda and Burundi) for the better half of the 20th Century. In my childhood they always stressed how tiny our country was and how unimportant it was. Now, this puts all of that into perspective.
I was surprised there was such a big difference between the French and English populations at the beginning, what with all the wars that have been fought, the schemes, and the diplomacy, you might have thought England would have run out of manpower.
Right fromtheir inception (927), the English were anxious about being invaded and that led to technological innovation, e.g. the English longbow (late 12th century-16th century), was the most revolutionary item of warfare in the Middle Ages, invented by the Celts on the border of Wales and England. It's not often Mentioned, but that is the ONLY reason England won any battles against France. All of England's battles won when they occupied Frannce for several decades, during the 100 years War, were entirely due to the archers and footsoldiers with the English longbow, and the Norman knights and cavalry, wouldn't even have tried to invade France without this, as the army was like 25% of the size, just like the population.95% of the archers were Celt or Anglo-Saxon, irony at its Finest 🙂 Then there is the ships that protected Protestant England from the vastly more numerous Spanish Armada in the 1500''s - faster, more manoeuvrable, with quicker Loading Cannon and again the only reason But the Spanish didn't successfully invade was due to their ships not being manoeuvrable enough in the difficult weather conditions and being picked off *AIt's no coincidence that the Industrial Revolution started there
Thats because english kings were by all means french and claimed the french throne. They were ruling over vast parts of france during the 100 years war and those provinces had their allegiance for the King of england
@@blackpaint9093 "because"? Because what? Your comment isn't referring to anything we are talking about. The OP was enquiring about how the English managed to Survive in wars without running out of manpower. This was entirely a combination of being protected by the English Channel along with having different technological advantages- What's anything got to do with the genetical cultural Make up of Kings and nobles, who were a fraction of the total population? As for your assertion that the Kings of England were "French" that's just tired propaganda, which is proven to be untrue under critical reasoning. Pre 1066, the kings of England were Anglo-Saxon, and after 1066,, Kings of England were at 1st a mixture of Scandinavian and old French/Frankish, but were culturally predominantly Scandinavian, e.g. they used longboats and Viking battle tactics.Then at the time of the 100 years War they were very different from those at Williams time, through centuries of integration with the Anglo-Saxons and Celts.Henry IV was the 1st king to speak English and ensure all written correspondence inside the king's chamber and outside was in English, as so with the House of Commons, in legal discussion
@@Rowlph8888 The industrial revolution was started by the wide spread use of the King James Bible. Everyone wanted to read it which raised literacy and thus invention. What is so ironic is that Christianity is now so despised.
This is beautiful. The fact the numbers haven't been carried over to current countries and we can see the historical and political dynamics over time is nice.
Even though Indonesia is in 4th place in terms of population, 60% of that number lives on the island of Java, which is the 5th largest island in Indonesia with an area of 126,700 square km. Indonesia has 17,001 islands. There is still a lot of empty space in this country.
It's already slowed down now that birthrate has decrease significantly... I guess in 5 years Indonesia won't be on top five in terms of population and has been overtaken by Pakistan and Nigeria.
@@Lady.B.ellinor4971 I am living in my home country and really happy here. If you are talking about a few immigrants, so yes they must have been working there lawfully as per the embassy, they are paying their taxes.
@@AshishSodhi-ih7qr I've no problem with any other country although we have too much illegal immigration here but the people that were invited here in the 60s will never stand up and speak out against terrorism and grooming gangs even though the country has been good for them.
@@Lady.B.ellinor4971well you lived in our country illegally for 200 years. Stole every resource you could have found even your queen's crown has stolen diamond then your people killed thousands of Indians (search jalliyawala bagh massacre:- your people killed hundreds of children, women , old people) .....so little repayment is right don't you think?
@@harshitkumar459 check out the child of 6 whom you made maharaja then check out how many countries he tried to sell them to also check who built your train lines that you've never improved on since the 1940s but more importantly if you are happy with starving children begging tourists then good luck to you, but also have a little read how ghandi used to sleep with naked 12 year old girls if you think that's humane you've got a lot to learn.
Brazil's population is just over 203 million according to the latest census (2022). In the graph, Brazil's population grew by 10 million in 5 years, but 2.5 million are born and 1.5 million die per year in Brazil and our immigration rate is zero.
I always find it amazing that many countries we thought of as poor and having terrible living situations all our lives, Were once great in the past. It just shows that with the right leadership, Everything can change.
@@TheESC1Indian subcontinent? 50% economy during mauryan rule ? 35% economy in 1000Ad ? 27% economy in 1700s? The 1st SUPERPOWER of the world ? WTF are they teaching in schools in the west ?
Principales economías ¿a qué precio? A la sobre población, el hacinamiento, la polución y la pobreza. Qué feo debe ser nacer mujer en esos países. Gracias a Dios nací en Occidente
@@luly3804c'était le cas en occident il y a deux cent ans, la majorité des gens étaient miséreux, pauvres et pondaient des enfants comme des poules, regardez nos pays maintenant nous avons tout mais nous sommes au bord de l'effrondrement de notre civilisation tandis que les autres ont tout à gagner pour leur avenir
@AkarshShukla-fn9ou That doesn't matter. If this video considers the Indians under British rule as populations for the British then the Indians under Mughal rule should be considered as the population of a Turco-Persian empire
Yeah our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
I'm really not a fan of how countries were removed from the map only to be replaced by their new name - it's really jarring and sometimes makes it difficult to know which country turned into what Otherwise really good vid
Yeah but our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
If you enjoyed this video, there's more waiting for you on our channel! We will regularly post content like this, exploring fascinating data about countries, economies, and demographics
A couple over in the qing dynasty Wife: "Honey, I've been thinking about this for a long time. But I wish to have some kids for the next 2 years" Man: "How much are we talking?" 1:14
The UK total is obviously the empire total. You couldnt even fit 456 million people on the British isles. You can see the massive drop when India gained independence
Well you obviously could but it would not be healthy lol, Yeah but our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
Fascinating to see UK population growing by 300% from 1765 to 1767. Apparently due to reduction in mortality rate driven by better housing from bricks and tiles, domestic hygene and innoculations for smallpox. I never learned this in school - why not?
My friend I want you to try and imagine how it would be possible for every woman in the UK to each have 6 net babies in 2 years at the same time, and for all of them to still get fed and cared for and not die... it's from colonisation 😂
India is already populated from past 1000+ years and people here are already mixed up with the densely people/areas due which people here in India don't care that much about population thing. There are Mughal empire,maratha empire,vijaynanda Empire, sanaka empire are part of india which already shown in this video there are more empire like this. But from past 5-6 years this thing got overhyped due to some news paper published that India will overtake china in population in upcoming years. Before that it was not even a thing for Indians to talk about.
@@yarsaz4347 yes indians considers Mughal empire as Indian Empire as they stayed for almost 200+years in Indian subcontinent before maratha empire destroyed it.
![The Korean War using Google Earth [Extended]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lJx6M7SqkvI/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Korean War using Google Earth [Extended]](/img/tr.png)
Imagine this: we are now in the rare times when China was overtaken by another country by population.
For the first time in hundreds of years
@@Sceptonic British empire had more 100 years ago
Apparently that's it for awhile now. India, hands and heels to the line from China, with the Yanks panelled in third. Sorry, we couldn't get to the mounting yard for a look. ❤😂🤣
@@gby1320 probably not, but that is okay. I am Australian. It is an Australian racecourse analogy. Only a bit of fun. 👍😁
China has a huge land and they did a birth control years ago, they're ok but for India it's very bad, it's a time bomb, they need a serious fix.
Fun fact:even if we take the billion people from India and China...they will still be the first and second most populous country
those two countries together (from hundreds) are more than 1/3 of all mankind and pretty soon half of it! think about that lol
yooo wtf you right...damn...like rank 1 and 2 are so close then there's such a huge drop
💀
@@krisstopher8259always have been
😂 it's funny coz it's true..
This was awesome - it shows the actual population administered by each nation rather than the "modern area". Great job!
😮😢🎉😂😢😅
Fun fact: Did u know?
1000 Bc - 200s
Population:
China: 39M
India: 24M
Ethipoia: 9.8M
Japan: 7.2M
Egypt: 6.9M
Greece: 6.4M
Iran: 2.8M
Sri lanka: 998K
Yeah, usually it's like Austria in 1944
@@Roblox_mrtomaswrong china population in 200 ad is 60 million 😂😂😂
Yes, it was awesome but there is also something very wonky about this chart. After all, how could Japan go from a population of about a 100 million in 1935 to more than 450 million by 1943? This is particularly odd when you consider that most of the able-bodied men were off fighting a war for much of this time. And furthermore, how could the population then just suddenly drop back down to 70 million in just the two years following WW2? First of all, Japan only lost about 3-million people during the war and not 300-million. And secondly you would expect the population to drop during the war rather than right after it. It just makes no sense. Did Godzilla just get hungry and swallow up 300 million people or something? Or perhaps they are counting the populations of the countries Japan was occupying during this time period but that really does not make any sense. It would only make sense if these remained part of Japan after the war and were not merely occupied by them during the war.
I’m from Small country called Kyrgyzstan, so funny thing we were part Mongols when they where in top 2 by population , we were partly under China empire when they where top 2 , we were part of USSR when they were top 3 , but now we are small but independent country with 7 million population 🙂🇰🇬
who says you are small and just 7m?
You are part of 2B+ Muslim Ummah ☪️
@@MuhammadHamas They are called countries for a reason...Duhhhh. Faith has nothing to do with it. Just because the USA, Canada, United kingdom, Australia and New Zealand are all majority Christian doesn't mean they are the same country. That's a simple difference.for your head to get around.
@@Rage_Harder_Then_Relax why are you interrupting between two Muslims. Got any serious Problem?
Greeting from CHina😂
@@MuhammadHamas you do realize being Muslim doesn't make you special right
Re Brazil: the data shown in the video was based on estimates from the 2010 census. The results from 2022-2023 census just came out and the total population is only 203 million, 10 million less than shown.
Até 2050 a população ainda diminuir mais ainda dq 203 milhões
@@mateus_venancio Se você está respondendo pra mim, isso que postei é o resultado oficial do IBGE, não é estimativa.
@@mateus_venanciogostosa
E você acredita no IBGE?
Eles só fazem "estimativas"!
Nunca vi um cidadão de serviço pelo IBGE no meu bairro e nem na minha cidade!
E olha que moro perto da cidade do Rio de Janeiro!
Só no mês de novembro nasceu 5 crianças na minha família KKKKKKK😂😂
A população brasileira deve estar beirando 240 milhões!
@@Brazilian553 Você parece fazer uma confusão entre medidas e estimativas futuras. Toda medida tem um erro, mas estimativas são extrapolações a partir informação provavelmente já datada, o que envolve níveis muito maiores de erro..
Is insane how much the population of Nigeria and Pakistan increased in the last 10 years
That’s not gonna end well
Allah give them new bby
@@jeff-hd9og It will stabilize, there is a population capacity and every over populated country is expected to reach it in a couple of years. (cant be said about africa tho)
@@NotePortalbut what happens after that capacity is reached is not good
Mass migration of course. It's what happens when any country over populates past its capacity.
It boggles the mind to think that India's and China's populations are the same number but in vastly different-sized countries.
Well, 96% of Chinese population lives in just 40% of China's land area which is around 4million sqkm.
India is more evenly populated with 3.3 m sqkm
So i wld say its not that big of a difference
A lot of China is just uninhabited. Whereas India has people in its every part.
There is not a "mind-boggling" difference between the land area of China and India.
Both come in the top 7 largest countries.
India looks small on the map because of Mercator's projection.
India's huge on the globe.
@@Venomous6942 India is the 7th biggest country in area, but China is still 3 times as big. You're right about distribution though, a HUGE majority of China's population is in the eastern half.
60% of Chinese area is inhabited, mostly Tibetian autonomous region
India is not nearly as densely populated as Bangladesh, South Korea, Japan, or The Netherlands.
The fact that India & China have been the most populous places for over 400 years is INSANE like how is that possible
Strong family values
Due to deep religious/cultural reasons & extremely high economic uncertainty, male offspring became the ONLY gender desired. (Rural Chinese, in fact, went so far as to MURDER their own infant girls at birth, especially after the 1970s One-Child Policy became law.)
@@itsjustbusinessbrokiedoesn't have shit to do with family values 😂😂 basically arable land
@@seanthe100fertile land 😅 and tropical sub tropical zones suitable for agriculture
And also near to equator 😅
Old civilizations and deep cultures.
Leaders
1600-1644: Ming Dynasty
1644-1688: Qing Dynasty
1688-1699: Mughal Empire
1699-1911: Qing Dynasty
1911-1926: Republic of China
1926-1947: United Kingdom
1947-1949: Republic of China
1949: India
1950-2023: People's Republic of China
2023 onwards: India
Cool
A Chinese dynasty/nation has been in the population lead 6 times 🏅
An Indian country has only done it twice in the time period given. So twice
And then we have the British. Once with their global empire!
Edit: things would have been a lot different if the raj was Independent and if the time period began in like 50 BC
Africa's poplation growing is just incredible. Also, Southeast Asia's population growing is unbelivable. The population growth of Brazil and the United States are understandable because they are basically immigrants from around of the world. But Africa and Southeast Asia, from the least populated regions in the world, became one of the most populated regions in the world by giving births. Thats just incredible.
well usually poorer lest developed regions have more children so that’s also not an incredibly great thing.
We should stop sending them aid
@@FREEDOM80085 yeah. We shouldnt give them food. They are growing their population unnessecerily. They can't handle themselves.
also theres the fact the fact that this birth rate trend has basically been going on forever its just people are living longer now.
And then they will come to the USA 🇺🇸 or Europe
The United Kingdom population halved when India gained independence.. lol
its actually british empire population not uk
537 million to 134 million. That's half? India had 330+ but British Empire lost other countries also.
And Indian wealth decreased by many percentages
@@SerCrispinColewhat india didn't lose a shit bro, only gained after they went
@@SerCrispinColeit only increased, during British periods more than 30 million people died in famines because of British incompetence, since independence there hasn't been a single large scale famine in India
If you watch closely, you can see some of these empires lose people in a single year, that's more than the entire population of some of the countries below it.
They lose the wars and territories
@@gozhdaa lose
@@gozhdaa territiries which means colonies
@@1210edu not entirely accurate. There's always been a lot of wars with respective neighboring countries... just all the back and forth in border disputes between the european countries is enough material to fill several books
@@gozhdaalike England 😂
Before 1950 it’s normal having 15 children and become grandparents at 30’s
After 1980 is normal having 1 or 2 children and become grandparents at 50’s.
Rightly said. My father's age is 63 and I am 29. Not married, no kids. This trend is emerging in India, In few years population growth rate will stabilise and then may be decline. Right now TFR in India is 2 which is lesser than replacement level 2.1. in 1960-70 TFR was 6.
In 2020, it's normal when people married and not desired to have kids.
@@stone-xl2nl Only because life expectancy is increasing as well. If you account for that, then it's already declining. As has been pointed out - 2.1 is replacement and most countries past a certain level of development are below that.
In the 21 century, it's normal now for kids( teens) to have kids from different boy friends, girl friends, husbands ( multiple marriages, group marriage, etc)
Rather than obeying the bibles law on marriage and family.
Today, as long as we receive benefits from the governments, we can " have as may kids as we want , as possible.
The Western world " they courage this" since we live in very wealthy countries.
Who cares, though, for how many people get sick, viruses, etc, and eventually die.
No wonder it's overpopulated. Along with " samesex marriage, IVF etc etc.
It's a very " sick" world.
15 children, however 5 of these might died early.
What is striking is how the top two have effectively been the same for the entire period (as well as for thousands of years before that).
The land and the weather conditions suits humans. Humans aren't built to live harsh cold weather that's why west people have to turn on heaters all the time so when heaters etc weren't invented people used to find places suitable for them and south Asia was a perfect match and still is.
Or it's because asians have too much sex
Another amazing thing is both India and China are oldest living civilization on earth.
Native Aussies? @@priyankakumarisingh4511
If india and china made new rule ........... It will effect one third of world population.
Fun fact: Bangladesh is 115 times smaller than Russia but is more populated as of 2023
It's interesting if you don't know anything about the climate. Do you know where the earth's climatic poles are located? There are two of them in the northern hemisphere - in Greenland (up to -70 °C) and in Russia (in Yakutia up to -70°C). In the southern hemisphere, in Antarctica (up to -90°C). The population density of Greenland is 0.03 people /km2, Russia - 8.55 people /km2 (in the region of Yakutia - 0.32 km2), Antarctica - 0. The area of Yakutia inside Russia is 3083523 km2, and few people want to move to the coldest Yakut village in the world Oymyakon, it happens there -70 ° C, but constantly there 500 people live there. Welcome!
Traffic jams and load sheddings 🫠🫠.
Russia is constantly at war with Europe and vice versa.
@minochenkovatn that what have to do?
Stop breeding bruh
the medieval period: When Population meant The Power you have
Not really, during medieval times Turco-Mongols defeated nations with populations 100 times of its own.
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRCCan you give an example ?
@@edouard9867 Tumu battle between Oirats and Ming Empire. Battle of Yehuling, between Mongols and Jin Empire.
Battle of Legnica, between Mongols and Europeans. Battle of Utus, between Huns and Eastern Roman Empire.
All won by Turco-Mongols. There are tons of examples actually.
turkic mughals conquered indian being in thousands against 100 of million of indian@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC
At the end it's all geographical locations and tactics.
In every timeline
India 🗿and China 🗿
those two are dresses
UK did quite good for most of the time no?
@@ToppatPlaysuk did nothing but colonize india😅😅😅
@@RahulChatterjee-le1jc you talking about the country that was the largest country in he world ever and took over 25%+ of the earth?
They colonized rather than rulling like a true ruler and it wasn't British monarch who was ruling.@@ToppatPlays
Very good video, not only is it shown to be accurate but also showing the new nations and empires that form with their respective territories, many other RUclipsrs just use modern borders instead of the overall empire.
You think this is accurate?
Straight away chinas population didn’t decline at all even though it has in reality. All the numbers just rose and that’s it.
@@floydpulley3509 you just say this without proof is very unconvincing. besides,this data came from the self-administered goverment.meaning potentially china has more people since at that time governing was not as effecient.
@@TheAnonymousKnightOfJustice really? Because you say so? The numbers are not a representation of real life, it’s literally just made to rise at certain speeds.
@@floydpulley3509 same, because you said so. I ask for proof not you stating facts. Cause I was doing the same thing
@@TheAnonymousKnightOfJustice Fair.
Indonesia growth after independence in 1945 was massive because of term that used in that generation. And it was "Banyak Anak Banyak Rejeki" that had meaning "More Children More Fortune".
It rapid growth need to reduced in early 80s by goverment with "Keluarga Berencana" or Family Plan program with 2 children per family.
Meanwhile your Government sterilized indigenous populations like Timorese - so not all good news.
If you count populations administratively, then the UK should be British Empire.
And the Tokugawa Shōgunate should be Japan or Empire of Japan, depending on the period.
You should read the video's description. It clearly states the conventions they're using.
Tokugawa was not empire of Japan
You bet me to it, as I thought exactly the same!
Watch Great Britain rise in 1766 as 'The Empire' is taken into account - (adding America and Canada population?)
@@joso7228 Yes but then it dos not make sense to not take the French Empire for instance with all of their African colonies Vietnam Laos and Cambodia. I don't see the French empire of napoleon accounting for all of Europe in 1811. This is just an example of accounting inconsistencies.
As a Nepali Proud to see malla dynasty .
HEY NEPALI, Yeti exist?
@@alexanderhk9168 Ofcourse they do!
We ride them to work everyday.
❤
Nipple empire 😂
I'm from India but I love nepal ❤️❤️❤️
Very nice work! especially the accurate flags! ❤😊
Флаги не соответствуют тем временам. (Некоторые)
It should be called british empire bro not Unitied kingdom, UK just had less than 50 million ppl
Better that way it is understood that it is the United Kingdom (England, Great Britain, the British Empire and the United Kingdom )
For complete accuracy it should have been called the British Empire for its duration because A) It was historically called that and B) for consistency as all other Empires were described as such.
Yes, both the Kingdom of Great Britain and the United Kingdom was just one part of the British Empire and only included Great Britain and Ireland
It counted the population of the colonies so the British Empire should have been the name that was used.
This is fantastic! While I doubt the program you use can actually do this, here’s a few hypothetical ideas I had to make this easier to follow:
- Name/flag changes on the fly. Instead of “Spanish Empire (Habsburg)” decreasing to zero while “Spanish Empire (Bourbon)” races up to replace it, it could just stay where it is and only change its label.
- Visually combining countries. Instead of “Kingdom of England” decreasing to zero while “Great Britain” increases from zero, imagine this: “Kingdom of Scotland” comes up from the bottom to the right, neatly slots on to the side of England, the label/flag changes to GB, and then it moves up to its new place on the list.
- Visually splitting countries. Imagine this: for the dissolution of the Soviet Union, all the republics split off from the right and descend in single file down the side, the remaining part changes label to Russia, and then moves down to its new place on the list.
- Visually representing changes in military occupation. For example, chunks of population would fly between “Republic of China” and “Empire of Japan” yearly as the tides of the war change. You could show migration in a similar way (if you had the data), but I would recommend against it, because it would add ambiguity when the point is to reduce it.
Cool ideas! Up!
Super fascinating. I wish there were pop ups showing the different world events that cause some of those shifts. I guess you'd have to slow it down to show some of them.
The time when Vietnam had a larger population than the USA
India's overtaking was epic
Y'all must be so proud, that's good
😂😂😂
That’s predictable. China enforced its one-child policy for years to combat the huge population growth.
@@Anama_7proud until you see yourself competing against 140 crore others for a single entrance exam 😂
@@southasianbrat3878We will get rid of that system and bring a new one!
If I had a nickel for every time an English speaking country had the world’s largest economy with the third largest population, I’d have two nickels. Not a lot, but it’s weird it happened twice.
Uk looted from India
Do u watch Shiloh and bros
@@7tynoobs461 no
😂
😂
Europe really stopped having children
That is interesting. The biggest population changes are, unsurprisingly, empires gained/lost and wars.
The two times I noticed the USA population dip was the Civil War and WW2.
During the Civil War, the US temporarily lost control of Confederate territories. During WW2, it lost control of the Philippines (to Japan).
The actual population of the US (or rather, territories currently controlled by the US) continued to grow, even during these wars.
The population gain for Japan in such a small time is horrifying
Great Work! What sources did you use?
In the description
I'm sure not a single Belgian knows that Belgium was in the top 15 of most populous countries (if one includes Congo, Rwanda and Burundi) for the better half of the 20th Century. In my childhood they always stressed how tiny our country was and how unimportant it was. Now, this puts all of that into perspective.
Yeah bro, except that Belgian Congo was personal property of the king of Belgium until recently and it's population treated like drought animals.
I'd prefer to be unimportant
@@marioblancodiaz2250define recently
Belgium was one of the worst-behaved colonial powers. They were all pretty bad, but Belgium was unusually brutal and murderous.
@@Unknown-jt1jo they even had human zoos in 1959
Poland Lithuania, cool to see that near the end of the 16th century we’d learn about it’s more commonly used and more modern name on the globe :)
India took the meaning of independence to the next level 😂 Look at the surge after 1947, it’s unstoppable.
😂😂😂seriously look funny 😁 🇮🇳💙🧿
It is not funny many of them died because of feminine but there was no feminine after independence
Average age was 25 for an Indian during British rule. So it's naturally gonna increase
Bcz of Muslim.
abe chutiye hindus 1 billon hai stupid muslim terrierst@@dkr1888
Maratha Empire 🚩
2:51 Maratha Empire 🚩🚩9:51 India 🇮🇳🇮🇳
No one cares 😂
@@No.mercy0008 Stay Out Of It Kid! We Care for Our Country & it's Enough! 🚩🇮🇳
It's the second largest after the Quin dynasty. Lamo you cared enough to comment. Jealous @@No.mercy0008
@@No.mercy0008 who tf r u? we care
Wtf wrong with you guys it's not praising vedio
I was surprised there was such a big difference between the French and English populations at the beginning, what with all the wars that have been fought, the schemes, and the diplomacy, you might have thought England would have run out of manpower.
When England won their colonies are also considered as their own population
Right fromtheir inception (927), the English were anxious about being invaded and that led to technological innovation, e.g. the English longbow (late 12th century-16th century), was the most revolutionary item of warfare in the Middle Ages, invented by the Celts on the border of Wales and England. It's not often Mentioned, but that is the ONLY reason England won any battles against France. All of England's battles won when they occupied Frannce for several decades, during the 100 years War, were entirely due to the archers and footsoldiers with the English longbow, and the Norman knights and cavalry, wouldn't even have tried to invade France without this, as the army was like 25% of the size, just like the population.95% of the archers were Celt or Anglo-Saxon, irony at its Finest 🙂
Then there is the ships that protected Protestant England from the vastly more numerous Spanish Armada in the 1500''s - faster, more manoeuvrable, with quicker Loading Cannon and again the only reason But the Spanish didn't successfully invade was due to their ships not being manoeuvrable enough in the difficult weather conditions and being picked off
*AIt's no coincidence that the Industrial Revolution started there
Thats because english kings were by all means french and claimed the french throne.
They were ruling over vast parts of france during the 100 years war and those provinces had their allegiance for the King of england
@@blackpaint9093
"because"? Because what? Your comment isn't referring to anything we are talking about. The OP was enquiring about how the English managed to Survive in wars without running out of manpower. This was entirely a combination of being protected by the English Channel along with having different technological advantages- What's anything got to do with the genetical cultural Make up of Kings and nobles, who were a fraction of the total population?
As for your assertion that the Kings of England were "French" that's just tired propaganda, which is proven to be untrue under critical reasoning. Pre 1066, the kings of England were Anglo-Saxon, and after 1066,, Kings of England were at 1st a mixture of Scandinavian and old French/Frankish, but were culturally predominantly Scandinavian, e.g. they used longboats and Viking battle tactics.Then at the time of the 100 years War they were very different from those at Williams time, through centuries of integration with the Anglo-Saxons and Celts.Henry IV was the 1st king to speak English and ensure all written correspondence inside the king's chamber and outside was in English, as so with the House of Commons, in legal discussion
@@Rowlph8888 The industrial revolution was started by the wide spread use of the King James Bible. Everyone wanted to read it which raised literacy and thus invention. What is so ironic is that Christianity is now so despised.
India is very hard working country 💀💀
There Many Ethnicities And Countries From Europe Want Colony India🗿
Bet youre both indian
This is beautiful. The fact the numbers haven't been carried over to current countries and we can see the historical and political dynamics over time is nice.
What people need to understand is that this includes their colonies
Maratha Empire cover many parts of current Pakistan 😅
But they don't know
Upto Peshawar
British empire covered all of Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh. 🔥🔥🔥
The song for this entire video is The Barber of Seville by Rossini.
Ok, but not song, it's Opera ; )
And I wonder how many babies have been born as a result of it since Rossini wrote it!?!
If earth had 100 people, 35 people would be from either India or China. 65 people would be spread across the remaining countries.
HAHAHAHA..love from India
Even though Indonesia is in 4th place in terms of population, 60% of that number lives on the island of Java, which is the 5th largest island in Indonesia with an area of 126,700 square km. Indonesia has 17,001 islands. There is still a lot of empty space in this country.
its not empty
Isn't Indonesia like the same size as Europe by area? Austronesia is actually huge by size it's just the islands are really spread out.
It's already slowed down now that birthrate has decrease significantly... I guess in 5 years Indonesia won't be on top five in terms of population and has been overtaken by Pakistan and Nigeria.
@@TheRazeluXE That's not bad news😄
Being able to see when a country was taken over/split due to conflict is the coolest part. I feel like such a nerd for how thrilling this was.
BRO, IN WHICH SOFTWARE DO YOU MAKE SUCH BAR GRAPHS ?
PLEASE TELL ME 😊
flourish studio
This one is HTML
bro asked so humbly
Unreal Engine 5
Maratha empire 🎉 जय शिवराय 🥰
India's freedom in 1947 and Bangladesh freedom in 1971 were the best thing ever happened for us 🎉
And yet you all moved to Britain
@@Lady.B.ellinor4971 I am living in my home country and really happy here. If you are talking about a few immigrants, so yes they must have been working there lawfully as per the embassy, they are paying their taxes.
@@AshishSodhi-ih7qr I've no problem with any other country although we have too much illegal immigration here but the people that were invited here in the 60s will never stand up and speak out against terrorism and grooming gangs even though the country has been good for them.
@@Lady.B.ellinor4971well you lived in our country illegally for 200 years. Stole every resource you could have found even your queen's crown has stolen diamond then your people killed thousands of Indians (search jalliyawala bagh massacre:- your people killed hundreds of children, women , old people) .....so little repayment is right don't you think?
@@harshitkumar459 check out the child of 6 whom you made maharaja then check out how many countries he tried to sell them to also check who built your train lines that you've never improved on since the 1940s but more importantly if you are happy with starving children begging tourists then good luck to you, but also have a little read how ghandi used to sleep with naked 12 year old girls if you think that's humane you've got a lot to learn.
The fact that my country actually was called “United States of Brazil” is so LOL
Its a USB lol
And if you have a port city, it will be called "USB Port".
The Maratha empire🚩🚩
Jai Bhavani 🚩
Jai shivaji Majaraj🚩
छत्रपती शिवाजी महाराज यांना मानाचा मुजरा 🚩🙏🙇♂️
Considering the size of their population, the difference is miniscule. China and India basically have the same size population
MINUSCULE.
Wait, you tell me that the top two countries with highest population has ALWAYS been India and china.
Wow
How could you not know this before? I thought it's common sense.😅
The population drop in Japan in 1945 was craazy💀💀
It’s when the empire ended, you literally see normal Japan rise again shortly after
The reason why Japan's population has decreased is that Korea became independent from Japanese rule
@@방귀다장-p9kjapan also lose china and taiwan in 1945
@@방귀다장-p9k
and Manchuria , Indonesia , etc
Brazil's population is just over 203 million according to the latest census (2022). In the graph, Brazil's population grew by 10 million in 5 years, but 2.5 million are born and 1.5 million die per year in Brazil and our immigration rate is zero.
Yep. And probably the fertility rate is < 1.5 at this moment in Brazil.
Love india from PH 🇵🇭❤️🇮🇳
🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
Love 🇵🇭 from India 🇮🇳
9:58
India:🏃
China: 😎👑
And now India: 😎
China: comes very "populated" when "first" in wars, too.
Do you know what I mean by this?
90 seconds to midnight ( doomsday clock) is on its way.
And now China reverse walking
I always find it amazing that many countries we thought of as poor and having terrible living situations all our lives, Were once great in the past.
It just shows that with the right leadership, Everything can change.
Examples?
@@TheESC1literally the country that is #1 in the video
@@TheESC1 🇪🇦
@@TheESC1Indian subcontinent?
50% economy during mauryan rule ?
35% economy in 1000Ad ?
27% economy in 1700s?
The 1st SUPERPOWER of the world ?
WTF are they teaching in schools in the west ?
多学一些世界历史，或许可以增长你的见识。
#MARATHAEMPIRE #MARATHA #CHHATRAPATISHIVAJIMAHARAJ ❤
Being one of the most populous countries in the world doesn't make it the best, and everything comes with risks.
yeah actually the opposite lol. most populated ones are the worst rn
It is a cycle countries population grows and then comes prosperity and with prosperity comes decline in population
Man. Can you imagine how spacious China would be with 'only' 200 million people?
CAN YOU MAKE LANGUAGES 3000? TOP 25 LANGUAGES FROM 1000 TO 3000??
interesting fact: in 1607, the population of Russia does not exceed the population of modern Moscow
With the way things are going, those 1607 boundaries are about to come back.
@@Perfectly_Cromulent351 🤡
Argentina tiene docient veces más millones de pobla ajaja
@@Perfectly_Cromulent351хлопчик спит наш на дороге, хлопцу снится Перемога, чтож не будем хлопчика будить
Скоро украина станет частью России и чуть-чуть польшей. Так уж и быть Польша переживет украину.
Nobody:
China thousands years ago: Yeah, 1rst to reach 10 million people.
Yes, China probably was the first country to reach 10 million people 3 thousands years ago and 100 million 1 thousand years ago.
Ladies and gentlemen, right there is the list of the future top economies.
😎😎😎
El cáncer del planeta Tierra
Principales economías ¿a qué precio? A la sobre población, el hacinamiento, la polución y la pobreza. Qué feo debe ser nacer mujer en esos países. Gracias a Dios nací en Occidente
Always keep in mind,@first you have to feed them all.
@@luly3804c'était le cas en occident il y a deux cent ans, la majorité des gens étaient miséreux, pauvres et pondaient des enfants comme des poules, regardez nos pays maintenant nous avons tout mais nous sommes au bord de l'effrondrement de notre civilisation tandis que les autres ont tout à gagner pour leur avenir
very interesting, thanks
江戸幕府が英語で「Tokugawa Shogunate」だということをこの動画で初めて知った
Is it wrong?
Thanks for everyone who contributed 🎉❤😂
Very interesting 👌
Those who paused the video at 1947 will be definetely indian❤
in this 2nd and 3d most Populas empires MUGHAL and MARATHA were Indian Empires
Mughal rulers were ethnic Turko-Mongols who spoke Persian
@@yarsaz4347 And conquered India
@@joso7228 and then brutally beaten by Maratha Empire.
@AkarshShukla-fn9ou That doesn't matter. If this video considers the Indians under British rule as populations for the British then the Indians under Mughal rule should be considered as the population of a Turco-Persian empire
@@yarsaz4347Oh Mr.
*From Jahangir, every single Emperor is Half Rajput*
*Mughal Rules official name is Hindustan*
nice information
Tiny England was top for a while .. and that feels so crazy.
Yeah our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
Maratha Empire 🚩 one India 🇮🇳 jai shree ram🙏🚩
I'm really not a fan of how countries were removed from the map only to be replaced by their new name - it's really jarring and sometimes makes it difficult to know which country turned into what
Otherwise really good vid
Music is so balanced with the video.....anyone plz tell the music name ?
The Barber Of Seville - The Munich State Orchestra
@@QQaliaful thanks bro ❤️
This is why we called Great Marathas 🚩
*FUTURE IS BRIGHT FOR INDIA* 🇮🇳
yes India have the most Youth population in world
Woah woah woah, what went on with the numbers of Empire of Japan why did it drop so crazy?
The conquered large parts of Asia during WW2.
@@duitk Ah, I had a feeling that was the case. Like they included people from other countries as part of their population during that time?
@@redsoxfox yes this list includes conquered territories.
Did you really think an island can host about 450 million people? It ofcourse includes all the territories they conquered
Japan had Manchuria , Korea , Taiwan , Indonesia , Filipine , vietnam.
the fact that ethiopia passed japan is insane 😮
and will surpass México this year 😮
At school in England as a really young boy we sang a chant in the yard . . "We won the war" Turns out of everyone we lost the most
Yeah but our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
Это крошечная страна без колоний было 2 экономиков мира после сша в 1865-1900 годах,начала важнейшую промышленную революцию
@@pr-tj5by
Maratha Empire ❤
In 1600 AD we can spot our Forefathers generation of MALLA DYNASTY NEPAL 🇳🇵❤️🙏😍
Top 15 😮
Maratha empire🚩
Jai shivaji🚩
If you enjoyed this video, there's more waiting for you on our channel! We will regularly post content like this, exploring fascinating data about countries, economies, and demographics
A couple over in the qing dynasty
Wife: "Honey, I've been thinking about this for a long time. But I wish to have some kids for the next 2 years"
Man: "How much are we talking?"
1:14
The UK total is obviously the empire total. You couldnt even fit 456 million people on the British isles. You can see the massive drop when India gained independence
Well you obviously could but it would not be healthy lol, Yeah but our tiny little country not only had the largest Empire by far ever but also for 20 years had the largest population under her, not bad for our tiny country
Forget that, You can fit the entire world population into greater London 7.5B people, I've just googled it.
Proud to be Indian ❤❤
God I didn’t know my own country (Korea) had that much people 😳😳
I like this reflects nations as per the history than modern names.
Can't belive how the least populated countries became the most populated countries in the 21st century due to the highest birth rate.
that second largest Maratha Empire was India..Ruled by our King Chttrapati Shiva ji Maharaj.
4:32 touch's Our Heart ❤️🚩
It needed a global total counter too.
Fascinating to see UK population growing by 300% from 1765 to 1767. Apparently due to reduction in mortality rate driven by better housing from bricks and tiles, domestic hygene and innoculations for smallpox. I never learned this in school - why not?
Nope. That growth is due the incorporation of colonized countries' populations.
The growth was because they colonized major countries that time counting their population in them
I learnt it at school in Australia when I was in Grade 3!
My friend I want you to try and imagine how it would be possible for every woman in the UK to each have 6 net babies in 2 years at the same time, and for all of them to still get fed and cared for and not die... it's from colonisation 😂
😂
10:58 FINALLY ANG AKING BANSA NA PILIPINAS AY NANDITO NA! 🇵🇭
12:00 PROUD AKO NAGING IKA LABINTATLO SA POPULASYION.
Maratha Empire Shree Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj❤❤❤❤❤❤
I saw at least one error: around 1645, China lost more than half of its population due to Qing's rebel.
Killed? That's a lot of dead bodies. I heard during old times in China war means millions of deaths and it was a very normal thing.
It crazy that Indian people feel proud to be the most populated country 💀
I don't think so
India is already populated from past 1000+ years and people here are already mixed up with the densely people/areas due which people here in India don't care that much about population thing. There are Mughal empire,maratha empire,vijaynanda Empire, sanaka empire are part of india which already shown in this video there are more empire like this. But from past 5-6 years this thing got overhyped due to some news paper published that India will overtake china in population in upcoming years. Before that it was not even a thing for Indians to talk about.
@@pratikbhandare3497 Do Indians consider the Mughals to be an Indian empire?
@@yarsaz4347 yes indians considers Mughal empire as Indian Empire as they stayed for almost 200+years in Indian subcontinent before maratha empire destroyed it.
@@yarsaz4347no
Today nobody knows about vijayanagar empire ... Its our beautiful india
King Krishnadevaraya❤, hampi was the richest city in world at those time
we know the great maharaja krishnadev raya
@@Dheeraj-y4f yes
ik it
but most people don't know too much about Indian history so yeah.
So weird seeing the UK being the most populated country until it finally let go of India.
India 🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤❤❤❤