Getting Into It With a Neighbor
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- The plaintiff claims her neighbor, the defendant, had her car illegally towed, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff blocked his driveway with her vehicle, so he called the cops. After that, the city towed the plaintiff's car away.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case #28302
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
Even if it was intentional, so what! You don’t have the right to block someone’s driveway and they are not obliged to call you when they want access to their property. 😡
So what? 😂😂😂 He can’t take up public curb space because he wants to keep the larger, illegal driveway.
@kimr282 Pay attention to what is said at the end of the video about wrongfully towing 😊
@@686JM I did. And I stand by my statement. They are not obliged to call them when they want access to their property.
Furthermore you don’t have to be 100% correct to get someone towed, but you ought to be willing to live with the consequences of your decision if you do… some things are so worth the cost.
@@fitnessfocusedin the UK people do that! If the kerb isn't dropped it's not legal so you can park across it.
To the plaintiff, if your brother doesn't reside with your mother and is only visiting, he has NO business parking, blocking the defendant's driveway. Sounds like entitlement.
He has no business blocking it regardless. Her mums sick, right? Now if she needs emergency services I bet she'd want them to park as close as possible.
How do you have the nerve to park in front of someone's driveway?!?!
If he extended his curb cut to the end of the block, would it make it a driveway??? 😂😂😂
@kyled2329 The defendants were splitting hairs when the picture clearly showed their driveway WASN'T blocked. Did you even pay attention to the case? BOTH sides are petty, but the defendants were in the wrong in getting the plaintiff wrongly towed.
If its blocked even 1 foot its blocked.
I had this happen to me a few months ago. Literally could not get my car out of my own driveway. I had another car that was not running in the other spot and someone parked behind my running car.
Endded up finding the neighbor that did it otherwise I would hsve had it towed.
Regardless of the legality of the driveway width, the plaintiff CLEARLY is blocking the driveway. And she knows it! Just because she knows someone down at Town Hall doesn't mean it's ok to use that connection to harass the homeowners.
I agree. I'm looking at the picture at 3:58 and she's so far into the driveway it even ticks me off and it's not my home lol.
The entire front wheel well is into his driveway. That's between 3 and 4 feet blocked, maybe more, and the other vehicle is maybe half a foot in.
Many states have laws that you cannot park within 5 feet of the edge of a driveway. I believe the smallest allowance is 3 feet.
That amount of clearance is crucial for line of sight and maneuverability.....especially onto what appears to be a narrow one-way street in this case.
That means if she parked at the very edge of his existing (too wide) driveway, it would allow the legal 9 feet plus 5 feet clearance.
I'll bet that's why the case against him was dismissed. Not that "he got lucky" like JM said.
JM made it sound like he was being stupid and petty, and he's clearly not.
If people parked on her driveway like that so she couldn't see oncoming traffic and had trouble turning onto the street, there would be BIG problems for them.
Way too many people like her. They think they can do whatever they want with no consequences. I see more and more of “her” type everyday.
Exactly I really don’t understand the verdict in this case, now the plaintiff feels entitled to block driveways by parking many feet into the area
There is no "regardless".
She can't be in violation of blocking a legitimate driveway that is technically not up to code (because it's too big).
@@JamieM470there was already a back and forth going on between the two.
JM was trying to make it clear that if the guy didn't call the tow, his driveway wouldn't be in question (again) - being the exact thing that prevented him from winning because it's not up to code.
Because his driveway has the wrong dimensions, you can't prove the car would have STILL been in a violating spot.
Working FROM HOME and watching People's Court , splendid Monday
Me too lol🎉🎉🎉
Don't work but studying at home with the people's court
Me too 😊
I've worked from home since 2022. Got lucky.
Same!
The neighbor could have called them to move the car. How about her have the courtesy of not blocking a driveway and not stirring up an issue? Then to top it off, she calls the city to site them because she got mad for the tow. She's not as innocent as she claims.
And in both situations she was right
How about them not having an illegal driveway
The plaintiff still shouldn't block the defendant's driveway then expect the defendant to track her down and call her every time he wants to get out.
yeah i'd tow her too...
Oh my goodness, she parked in the public curb space that was illegally cut out. 😂😂😂
@@fitnessfocusedI think they will lose in court this time, now he's had somebody towed and she has that judgement they will have to look more carefully at it. In the UK nobody can cut the kerb, the pavement is always owned by the county council and you would be sued and they'd bring in contractors and charge you a fortune to put it right. Here you have to get planning permission or as you guys say a permit to do that, without it you will be paying a lot of money for the time you managed to use it.
It was thrown out the first time , all they need to do is take that paperwork to prove it. Also, their real estate agent should be held accountable for not disclosing the 'illegal' driveway. That is a material fact that may have deterred the defendants from purchasing the house in the beginning
It was thrown out the 1st time but also notified it was an illegal drive.
The previous owners may have purchased it not knowing it wasn't legal and had no issues to let them know. If there were issues and they were made aware yet did nothing, then I would pursue something against them. There should be records with the city if they were ever notified.
All these owners had to do is call the car owner. She still has no right to block it though. Legal or not.
Well if it's not legal she clearly does have the right as she just won. Now he really messed up, because he had her towed and therefore could do it again the court will look at it more closely and this time may do more than just tell them it's illegal, this time they will probably be ordered to put it back how it should be.
ugh I was really rooting for the defendants here. plaintiff is just annoying.
Plaintiff is a piece of works
Sometimes I wish this is how our justice system worked. Annoying person - guilty. Bad eyebrows - guilty. Says um too much - put them under the jail 😂
Obviously, indisputable photographic proof was not enough.
I would totally set up a schedule where all my cars parked in front of my house taking turns... never use my "illegal driveway" again lol...
same
She did not deserve to win at all, that lady does what she wants and feels too entitled!!
Her wig needs it’s own parking spot
😂
😂 100%
Orrrr, maybe they could just NOT block a person’s driveway when they’re parking! No one should ever have to come and hunt you down, or even call you when you’ve inconvenienced them over, and over again.
If the driveway is illegal and shouldn't be there then what? In the UK people have say a single driveway and then pave over part of their front lawn to make a bigger driveway. I can absolutely park by the kerb on the added driveway as they can only legally enter and exit by the dropped kerb. I would guess this time they will lose in court as it's causing an issue.
That is one HIDEOUS wig.
Yes!!!!
I was thinking that.
When she tried to tuck it behind her ear i cracked up 😂
The money she won for the tow she can apply towards am updated wig!! lol
That's a bad wig? I thought she just never combed her hair. Lol
Wow 👌 First time I've ever seen someone win with a tow
I need to stop looking down at the comments during the intro
@@tvbandit115 same, but it’s so hard not too.
She sounds entitled 🙄 for her to say everybody parks there but her car is the only car to get towed. I believe she thought what's good for the goose is good for the gander.😂
Yes and thinks due to her "sick" mother she's entitled to the space. Where I come from, blocking a drive way is a tow a huge fine, you aren't even permitted to block your own
Plaintiff was wrong though
The plaintiff was clearly right. The defendants need to fix the illegal curb cut and restore the public parking space.
If she wasnt in violation, then the cops would not of issued her a ticket. they decided the car could be towed, not the defendant bc thats not how it works, u cant just have someone' car towed for no reason, it has to be illegally parked. so, she was obviously in the wrong, so why do they have to pay HER tow fee? unfair judgment in my opinion.
My feelings exactly, surprise she didn't ask for them to pay the ticket too
The police can only go by what you tell them. They haven't got time to go look up the street plans and see who was correct. If the driveway is illegal, which a police officer is not able to determine, and you got towed illegally then your redress to get your money back is what the plaintiff did. The defendant was really stupid for losing his temper like this as this time he will probably be ordered to restore the kerb. A judge won't like him ordering a tow and involving police all the while knowing the court had warned him the driveway was illegal. So the first case wasn't exactly tossed out as the judge made them aware of which bit was illegal. I presume the judge felt that would be enough to stop the parking issue, now they will have no choice but to order it to be restored if the defendant is going to call for illegal tows.
I would park my car in that spot everyday so the plaintiff couldn’t park there anymore
I don’t understand this verdict! The defendant is right that he couldn’t get out his driveway. Why should he risk hitting parked cars?
he knew by the time he towed it that he was in the wrong and had an illegal driveway. You cant come into legal things with unclean hands.
@@charliefleming3251 but that was thrown out by the court. So if it’s illegal why throw that out? And illegal or not…it’s still their driveway & they bought the home that way. It’s not like they purposely added onto the driveway AFTER they bought the home
The defendant's wife is extremely nasty. I'm absolutely positive, she's behind a lot of the problems that exist in their lives. Her husband is a simp, who already knew his driveway was illegal "before" he called the tow truck company.
@@magicworld3242 No one over the age of 13 should use the word simp. Also, you can’t be a simp to your WIFE.
Judge Milian was wrong in this case. The plaintiff was blocking the driveway and whether it was too long had already been throw out of court once. The plaintiff should park somewhere else, even if she has to walk a little bit.
I agree. If I had been ticketed and went to court and then it gets dismissed, what am I supposed to think? I would think my driveway must be fine then or at the least the city doesn't have an issue with it. And I'm sorry, that small gap between the two cars would make it very difficult to get out of and still be able to see the road is clear to back out into.
The plaintiff's wig looks like somebody styled it blindfolded. 😅😅
Wow ! The defendant really thought they had a case on her 😂😂😂😂 good for her
Yahoo 🎉🎉Made it here before Adrian's racist/ bs claims
😂😂😂
YESSSSSSS!!!!
It's a shame some RUclipsr lives rent free in your mind.
I am shocked at the judgement
BAD VERDICT.
That wig though
Ikr...giggle
I have to disagree with the judge on this one. They only called the cops, the cops came out and made the assessment to ticket and tow. The should either correct it or spray paint a line for the 8 feet allowed. Every time after that I’d be calling the police on her. How obnoxious is she to think she is entitled to park their just because the previous owner didn’t mind.
It's because she might not legally be in violation because their driveway is legal
The plaintiff was parked too close. Point blank, no one should have to fight to get out of the driveway. Unfortunately for them there was an issue with their driver way but that was too tight with the other car on the other side.
If their driveway wasn't so illegally wide, nobody would be blocking it.
@@ultimatecouponlady Legally, you're supposed to park 3-5 feet away from the edge of a driveway, depending on which state you're in.
So even if his driveway was the legal 9 feet wide, she was too close. She didn't leave enough clearance for him to see oncoming traffic or turn out safely onto a narrow street.
If he was driving a 7-foot wide truck, she left about one foot of clearance on either side for him to pull out. That's not 3-5 feet, so it's not safe.
@@JamieM470 this!
4:25 Car DOES NOT FIT because the road itself is not wide enough to be able to turn in/out. You would hit the side of your own car trying to turn without then having to drive over the curb on the other side. JMM must not be a good driver.
If the cops ticketed her she was blocking their driveway. What’s it matter if they called to have her towed?? If she wasn’t illegally parked they wouldn’t have towed her Karen ass!!!
they ticketed the defendents about an illegal driveway, not ticketed her.
you can call any tow truck to tow any car.... The tow truck was private nothing to do with law enforcement.
When the plaintiff has connection and became entitled to do whatever she pleases.
Let me tell EVERYONE! Having someone in hospice DOES NOT mean they’re on their deathbed.
Many people go there or put there for rehab.
Why is it up to Him to come knock on ur door to get ya to move? JM is so wrong on this one!! I’d be paying some kids in the neighbourhood to get her car!!
There was plenty of space to get out of the driveway. The defendant even stated that everyone in the neighborhood parked like that. The curb cut was way too long and thus illegal. The defendants knew that also. They just really disliked her and wanted to get her ticketed and towed. Now the plaintiff gets her money back from the ticket and tow and the defendants has a citation for the illegal curb cut. And they will have to pay money to get it corrected. All because they wanted to cause problems with the plaintiff. .
😂
Compassion, bring it back! Be "family" in the world. We are out here surviving together in one space. Kindness goes a long way!
That's a beautiful thought, but it will NEVER, EVER happen. 😢
@@laurielester9437 I’d like to think that we are out here (the compassionate ones) we will make a bit of difference one child at a time. I also work with children and pray I make an impact any way I can. I’ve learned over the years surviving out here. That I have more positive outcomes being positive. Coming from someone who has experienced things I wouldn’t wish upon anyone. I chose to keep compassion no matter the hurt I’ve endured. I will share it until my last breath. Not everyone is born or taught the tools needed to share compassion but I will never stop. We’re out here I promise !
@laurielester9437 it will in the new heaven and new earth when Jesus returns ❤
Judge, Why should a homeowner be required to squeeze out of their driveway because of it being partially blocked by any motorist?
Happy Monday everyone 😊😊😊
Happy Monday! ☀️
Happy Monday!
Another day we should be thankful to see
(I am blind in one eye and Grateful)
I love at the end when the litigants are trying to make some boring point and Doug doesn't give AF about what they're saying 😂
"Guess so" 😆😆😆
Everyone hates the plaintiff but I’m down with her. The judge explained the situation perfectly. The driveway is illegal and it doesn’t matter how annoying someone is.
There's TOO MANY people in the comments who think it doesn't matter that the driveway was illegal and the plaintiff should have been ruled against...
The judge explained that if the driveway was legal, the plaintiff might not have been in violation 🤷♀️ - plain and simple
@@VladmirPoopNthat’s what happens when people choose emotions over what’s right.
@@Alicia_W413😂😂😂😂😂
It's absurd that the government can say your driveway on the house you bought is too big AND you have to fix it even though you had not say in the damn driveway.
I would call the tow too.
Saying hello from Melrose Park Illinois 🇺🇲❤
It is that old, will everyone else do it. It's clear that's a driveway and out of respect you should not block it. She's mad because and wants justice for her and play victim.
why does the plaintiffs hair look so weird? driving me crazy!
No ma’am! Wrong judgement. The plaintiff was very entitled. I feel bad for the defendants having to deal with her on a daily basis.
Plaintiff is blocking the driveway. The initial complaint was dismissed…I don’t know why but it was. I know the judge’s job is to settle these things…I disagree with her decision. She was blocking the driveway.
7:00 It was already dismissed once. That's DOUBLE JEOPARDY. They cannot cite them for it being illegal again when that's already been adjudicated in court and it's been DISMISSED.
I don’t believe that applies in this case. For example. You can get more than one speeding ticket.
That is one unruly wig on the plaintiff.
Ya can't choose your family and you can't choose your neighbors
Hey lunch fam! I hope my People's Court family is doing well today. ❤
Thr defendant and his mom were definitely spiteful.
If you talking about the lady next to him, that's his wife.
😂😂😂 be careful parking I love his comments
If the street is narrow it would be difficult to pull out to make a left or right especially if a car is parked across the street.
Agree
Wrong verdict. She was clearly parked in his driveway. It not his responsibility to track down owners of cars.
I have so many people block my driveway too so I’m towing
At the start I thought the plaintiff was going to lose as that's usually how these cases go. But this case was different. Creepy neighbors. I loved the plaintiffs interview with Doug. SHE was in control of that interview! A strong righteous woman.
Her car is blocking part of the driveway
Well damm 😂
I've never seen a proboscus that big in my life.
WoW! U guys are really not liking her WIG😂😖😂
Being territorial and a petty can cost ya.
@6:19 the young man in the back row wearing the black shirt is on point!!! 👍🏾 He is absolutely right
Omg how do people live in the city. The more of these lawsuits in see the more I appreciate living in the rural area 😅
The judge ALWAYS trying to tell somebody how to do something!!! Like he said he couldn’t get out like damn stop trying to tell him he could have fit!
Her hair is…interesting.
Bad wig
Pick your battles wisely…
Wow, the defendants knew they had an illegal driveway but called to have the plaintiff towed because she was blocking their driveway, even though it was an illegal driveway! Make it make sense! Lol. Now, not only do they have to go to court again regarding this issue, they may have to incur costs to do construction on their driveway to make it legal.
She's so bias
Didn't know a home's driveway could he be illegal 🤔
Wow that is the first
It isn’t like you are a stranger to the neighborhood ??? Common courtesy to not park infront of someone’s home .
Everyone gets to park infront of their own home
I don't know how people get like this with their neighbors. Why make it miserable at your home¿?¿
I would keep calling the tow truck every day.
plaintiff talks like Lavern DeFazio!
What does her mom being sick have to do with her parking wrongly
That was an interesting case.
Why was the judge on the plaintiff’s side right from the beginning? So weird.
There is plenty of room to back up or drive into! The driveway. These people are acting like babies in a crib (not Snoop dog’s crib) snatching toys from each other.
Whats with the plaintif's hair?!
Too many "and's" drove me insane 🤪! The Plaintiff needs to use a different word.
Wrong judgement u can't block someone from.getting out
How bout asking her to move?
The plaintiffs attitude and demeanor is the number one reason I only lasted 3 weeks in NYC. I can not stand that personality and it is way too prevalent. Just annoying, pushy and dull.
Ahhhhh something else.
if she might not have been does that also imply she might have been?
The wig yo………. The wig 🤦🏾♀️ judgement in favor of never parting a wig with no part and sweating in it with frivolous lawsuits 💁🏾♀️ 👩🏾⚖️
Oh wow! The awful wigs in the thumbnail brought me in here. *Sheesh*
From the picture that’s going to be a tough turn for some folks.
Another bad wig! I can't understand why people think cheap fake hair looks good. Maybe it's better than what's under the cheap fake hair. A lot of macho business going on here. Stubborn vs Stubborn. Even if the defendant called her or sent a carrier pigeon to her house with a message tied to its foot, this woman would not have moved that car. She's a difficult neighbor. The defendants are just as bad. They just like to butt heads.
I want to know which side of the driveway had the unallowed footage so people would be permitted to park in it.
She was n after a “May or may not happen f been blocking driveway “. Has a come the entitled plaintiff didn’t have to prove she wasn’t illegally parked? 🤔
I am not happy with results… you can’t block someones driveway
Wrong verdict
Man suxs to live where you don't get along with neighbors
Wrong verdict. Judges decision based on feelings not law. Regardless of legality of driveway she parked in front of it and should be towed.
I might be the only one siding with the plaintiff here. Who tries to get someone’s dying grandma evicted
If the court says the driveway could be legal, they can sue her back for a refund for 2 separate matters and for emotional distress. She didnt win yet, even the judge has mentioned that the driveway matter isnt resolved yet. Plus, they can sue a previous owner for hiding the information about the property if an inspection was not conducted prior to a purchase. This matter seems to be ongoing ...
Yu must not know how the legal system actually works. At this point the driveway issue is between him and the city. Not her. So cant go after her for her reporting something and then police deciding to give ticket. The police have the final say so on the ticket. So no way to sue her and nothing to sue her for. Also after they sign the contract on a home, unless it is perfectly laid out in written words, or be able to prove the previous owners knew themselves the driveway was illegal. For most things when you buy a house you buy its problems as well as its pluses. Harvey might be annoys but he does have a law degree so can usally call it from outside. Which he did in this case.
@charliefleming3251
My reply was general suggestions, as you can see.
I do not have their paperwork to read.
Also, if a property was purchased within 2 years or so, it depends on the rules in a state and a contract itself, there could be hidden surprises.
Paperwork always speaks in court. Some came to court here, not very prepared, but there is still a lot that was questionable.
The judge did say that the neighbor may not be in violation - meaning it is still disputable !
The defendant's wife comes off so nasty. I know, She's the cause of a lot of problems. Her husband is just a simp that goes along with her BS.
Hello 👋 court family 😊
That's right, little petty b... I hate petty people.
That hair.
The law will not glove dirty hands. The driveway is illegal thus the illegal width is not protected under the law.