TikTok hearing LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments on platform’s fate

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 148

  • @fireinateacup89
    @fireinateacup89 15 дней назад +96

    Starts at 4:57

  • @Real_MR.HorrorTales
    @Real_MR.HorrorTales 14 дней назад +10

    Agree or disagree with their final decision. It's cool that we get to hear the questions and arguments.

  • @Mary-yc8vh
    @Mary-yc8vh 14 дней назад +4

    I don't understand why they kept cutting him off every time he was trying to explain! well.. that's your answer right there!

    • @micah1464
      @micah1464 3 дня назад

      That is standard procedure for Supreme Court hearings.

  • @luv2garden132
    @luv2garden132 15 дней назад +24

    Because they're justices, they can interrupt and speak over this lawyer? When they're the ones asking the questions? Why don't they let him answer? I give up not 10 minutes in.

    • @ejax904
      @ejax904 14 дней назад +17

      Justices can interrupt whoever they want, lawyers cannot interrupt the Justices. When you're on the highest court in the land, you get extreme deference in argument.

    • @mtmitchell34
      @mtmitchell34 14 дней назад +5

      Yep. I’ve never argued before the S.C., of course, but I have argued before Ninth Circuit with same rules. I have no issue with the rule.

    • @timgriffin3368
      @timgriffin3368 14 дней назад

      It's part of the deal.
      The SG, who i adore, is very trying to finish her thought as they're interrupting.

    • @Queen-sk8kh
      @Queen-sk8kh 14 дней назад +2

      The court interrupts simply because they are seeking a simple answer.

    • @Leetmero
      @Leetmero 14 дней назад +1

      You gave up 10 minutes in because of your fried tiktok brain

  • @ElGuapoSalsero
    @ElGuapoSalsero 11 дней назад +7

    Man it would have been GREAT if they had added who is talking at the time. We want to know which justices are thick headed

    • @thharrimw
      @thharrimw 6 дней назад

      If you watch many supreme court decisions, then you learn their voices.

  • @darren2098
    @darren2098 14 дней назад +12

    His argument is bs CIA has been manipulating media for ages 😂

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 12 дней назад

      I don’t want China manipulating media.

  • @AustinLeftyMusic
    @AustinLeftyMusic 14 дней назад +19

    I have a small business where my primary sales is on TikTok. This would be financially devastating for me and millions of other Americans if this app gets banned.

    • @shirellediana
      @shirellediana 14 дней назад +3

      What would have if all your financial information get released

    • @AustinLeftyMusic
      @AustinLeftyMusic 14 дней назад

      @shirellediana That risk doesn't outweigh the amount I make on TikTok, plus that's a risk for every online platform

    • @bluenic0le
      @bluenic0le 14 дней назад +1

      ​@@shirelledianaApple just paid out 95M because Siri was listening in on everyone's private convos. It's ok when THEY do it?

    • @royahawke
      @royahawke 14 дней назад +8

      @@shirellediana that’s missing the point completely. Many businesses, such as Austin’s, have proven to benefit from the platform. Whether it’s storefronts or user generated content, businesses thrive on there.

    • @bluenic0le
      @bluenic0le 14 дней назад

      ​@@shirelledianaApple just settled and has to pay 95M because it was proven that Siri was spying on users private info/convos. Should they be banned? There's no proof TT has done any such thing.

  • @katybebop
    @katybebop 14 дней назад +25

    Ya know, after their decision to be cowards so many times lately on the lawfare issues…I really don’t have any faith in their judgements or ability to decide things with courage and clear thinking.

    • @starvedbaby2510
      @starvedbaby2510 13 дней назад +2

      What does that even mean? Are you saying they didn’t rule in the way you see things?

    • @katybebop
      @katybebop 12 дней назад

      @ no…what they rule they rule…I know that…just dont try to “split the baby” with their decisions so as not to get blowback… they undermined their own July ruling for presidential immunity with mitigation for a local jurisdiction jury decision…which they overrule AlL the time when they want to….that’s my point…just decide the law and spit it out with courage. Let the chips fall where they may..half of the population will be upset anyway with ANY decision…That’s the nature of their responsibility.

    • @williamhenning4700
      @williamhenning4700 9 дней назад +1

      @@starvedbaby2510 They're saying they didn't like the outcome of one of the case so now they doubt the reasoning where they didn't before despite the reasoning always for a decision always being publicly available.

  • @futurebrnd
    @futurebrnd 8 дней назад

    Its a foreign business with local headquarters. Therefore it should be protected

  • @ziggyc3004
    @ziggyc3004 14 дней назад +8

    Can you imagine Reagan's response to letting the soviets control TV news stations in the US.

    • @MichaelTorrance-p8c
      @MichaelTorrance-p8c 14 дней назад

      We went from Reagan calling the Russians the greatest threat to
      America to having a US president full bought and paid for by the Russian president! We’re about to swear in a real life Manchurian
      candidate! We are basically going to be Russia West in about 9 days!

  • @constancewashington9019
    @constancewashington9019 14 дней назад +10

    Why don't they do something about the crimes that Clarence Thomas is constantly committing instead of banning Tiktok?

  • @maryann-jc9jj
    @maryann-jc9jj 14 дней назад +13

    Justices want to make sure they are the only criminals with access to anything they wish to take

  • @brianmyles6871
    @brianmyles6871 15 дней назад +6

    So was there a decision

    • @madad0406
      @madad0406 15 дней назад +3

      Expected by the end of next week

    • @kkimberly2004YT
      @kkimberly2004YT 15 дней назад

      @@madad0406oh dang I hope they repeat this 😮

    • @riseharris5204
      @riseharris5204 15 дней назад +4

      These fools are actually trying to debate our 1st Amendment rights!
      Maybe We the People should give each member of congress pocket Constitution🙄

    • @Valkyrae123
      @Valkyrae123 14 дней назад +8

      @@riseharris5204this has nothing to do with freedom of speech

    • @riseharris5204
      @riseharris5204 14 дней назад

      @ 😂

  • @shpp2024
    @shpp2024 14 дней назад +3

    sotomayor's voice is sooo calming.

  • @starvedbaby2510
    @starvedbaby2510 13 дней назад +1

    I cannot tell the difference between the female lawyer and Justice Jackson
    Their voices and the way they speak tells me they were both groomed by the same entities in law.
    It blows my mind
    I don’t know who is speaking???

    • @ElGuapoSalsero
      @ElGuapoSalsero 11 дней назад

      Exactly. I would have expected Ketanji Jackson to be more accepting and pro people than she is coming off here.

  • @Real_MR.HorrorTales
    @Real_MR.HorrorTales 14 дней назад

    And they ask some great questions

  • @Pyrrhic.
    @Pyrrhic. 7 дней назад

    This is an easy slam dunk case. Both political parties want to ban TikTok. It’s a national security issue. SCOTUS just had to give a stamp of approval with no blowback.

  • @gaylaaustin7468
    @gaylaaustin7468 14 дней назад +3

    There are other similar platforms for the notion of a public square for exchange of ideas

    • @harlemw651
      @harlemw651 14 дней назад +2

      None of them work as well as TikTok. That's why so many small businesses have done well on there. Their algorithm game is unmatched.

    • @ryank4792
      @ryank4792 13 дней назад

      Most of them are in China's pocket as well, but also are paid off by the US government. TikTok isnt paid off by the US, which is why it is being banned.

  • @timgriffin3368
    @timgriffin3368 14 дней назад

    Go SG!!!

  • @josephnorton8500
    @josephnorton8500 12 дней назад

    Supreme Court

  • @cutiepie1798
    @cutiepie1798 14 дней назад

    Elizabeth Prelogar argument is pretty impressive. I could see her as Justice hoping on the Republican side.

    • @ryank4792
      @ryank4792 13 дней назад

      No it wasn't. Her argument is that China wants us all to argue and ignore what they do. But that's what the US government does every day and it's been proven. Her argument basically was we need to shut down the US government, since it is the same reasoning as TikTok

  • @raequinn9986
    @raequinn9986 10 дней назад

    Lowkey want Joe Rogan to listen to this bc of the “Joe” analogies 🤭

  • @bhayovah
    @bhayovah 14 дней назад +12

    Why did none of the Justices ask a key question: What is TikTok US without Bytedance's algorithm? The answer would be, "nothing". Accordingly, for all intents and purposes, the First Amendment right hinges on Bytedance, not the shell TikTok US. And foreign corporations controlled by foreign governments do not have a First Amendment right.

    • @WvAngelvW
      @WvAngelvW 14 дней назад +1

      💯

    • @ziggyc3004
      @ziggyc3004 14 дней назад +1

      Don't kid yourself. If they didn't do it, someone else would have.

    • @bhayovah
      @bhayovah 14 дней назад +3

      Grow out of kidhood. Many, incl. the US big tech, have tried to replicate it but have failed miserably. This is just far too advanced of a technology. As of now, no one but Bytedance can do it. And that's the point.

    • @ziggyc3004
      @ziggyc3004 14 дней назад

      False. Google replicated it in no time.

    • @bhayovah
      @bhayovah 14 дней назад +2

      Google, Google's lawyers, and technology experts would overwhelmingly disagree.

  • @LegendaryEatZ
    @LegendaryEatZ 14 дней назад

    TikTok legal fees just makes lawyers happy

  • @ramblerchic8180
    @ramblerchic8180 14 дней назад

    Where is Justice Jackson on vacation or did she recuse herself?

    • @subs-kh2mw
      @subs-kh2mw 13 дней назад

      She spoke multiple times. Did we listen to the same hearing?

  • @angelayala42
    @angelayala42 12 дней назад +5

    I agree the owner of TikTok should be an American 🇺🇸

    • @JaimeLynn-r4o
      @JaimeLynn-r4o 11 дней назад +3

      Why lol. The owner of Tesla is canadian. Being american has never been a law for having a business in the US.

    • @cmtheone
      @cmtheone 11 дней назад

      @@JaimeLynn-r4o Elon Musk is originally South African and although has a 20% stake, isn’t the owner of the company as they have many shareholders.

    • @orlandofoxxx
      @orlandofoxxx 10 дней назад

      You don’t understand unless you really know what TikTok is. It’s a wonderful thing and the owner has nothing to do with it. The people on the app are a community. Also the algorithm is different. If someone from America bought the TikTok name, but didn’t have access to the algorithm, TikTok would be ruined

  • @firefighterwoman2277
    @firefighterwoman2277 8 дней назад

    Plus I herd TikTok is going to be saved and I also herd someone is buying TikTok

  • @firefighterwoman2277
    @firefighterwoman2277 8 дней назад

    Leave TikTok alone it’s not going anywhere okay I’m hearing someone is buying TikTok and plus I herd it’s just banned it from the AppStore plus it will be still on the phone so we can still use it so plz leave it alone it’s our TikTok life

  • @thechronicillnessdiaries2773
    @thechronicillnessdiaries2773 14 дней назад +11

    These old people have NO clue what TikTok is and how valuable it is to Americans.

    • @gaylaaustin7468
      @gaylaaustin7468 14 дней назад +5

      It’s spyware

    • @satiricalsartorial
      @satiricalsartorial 14 дней назад

      ​@@gaylaaustin7468by what proof

    • @constancewashington9019
      @constancewashington9019 14 дней назад +1

      They don't really care.

    • @royahawke
      @royahawke 14 дней назад +3

      @@gaylaaustin7468haven’t had my data breached, what’s your point?

    • @bluenic0le
      @bluenic0le 14 дней назад

      ​@@gaylaaustin7468because it's been proven or because they say so? I've said it in tons of these comments, it was just proven Siri has been spying on us for years. Apple is paying 95M and business as usual 😂

  • @sharonmarion3654
    @sharonmarion3654 14 дней назад +3

    They need to get rid of it and x and Facebook

  • @TheTrueDemand
    @TheTrueDemand 14 дней назад +5

    I can see the CCP bot army is alive and well in the comments.

  • @nelsonking
    @nelsonking 14 дней назад +3

    I'm a TikTok Shop Partner. I literally will lose millions if TikTok stops operations. We are in the process of diversifying to another platform but that will take until September. I'm not sure I'll be able to pay everyone's salaries until then. A lot of the people who want TikTok banned don't quite get the full picture. The platform is more than just posting silly videos.

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 12 дней назад +1

      I loose lot of money if they stop drugs illegal.
      So drugs should be legal.

    • @marilynclark7298
      @marilynclark7298 9 дней назад

      It's annoying and people that watch it are influenced alright, to have the attention span if a knat.

  • @DanNica
    @DanNica 13 дней назад

    take Romania for example, how tiktok messed up the elections, TikTok is a weapon!

  • @ezye8513
    @ezye8513 14 дней назад +3

    This is a Chinese owned platform. They have no first amendment rights

    • @bluenic0le
      @bluenic0le 14 дней назад +7

      Sure, but Americans have no say in what apps we can and can't have on our phones? That's crazy.

    • @autumkennedy4133
      @autumkennedy4133 14 дней назад

      Has nothing to do with china and then having first amendment rights the whole point is Tik tok and American citizens who use Tik tok it is in fact going against our rights… it all boils down to the election and the fact Tik tok has opened alot of peoples eyes to the current corruption in the current administration and hating the fact we are getting true facts and connecting dots and they hate that. They should have to wait until trumps inauguration which is 10 days Biden is gone he’s not president after 10 days so his want to ban it is completely irrelevant now.

    • @nelsonking
      @nelsonking 14 дней назад +3

      You clearly did not listen. TikTok Inc is an American company.

    • @NotSettlingForSecondBest
      @NotSettlingForSecondBest 13 дней назад +1

      There is no constitutional right to have an app on your phone. Many apps and websites are illegal.

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 12 дней назад

      @@nelsonking no it’s not. It is owned by byte dance, a Chinese company.

  • @DebbieHart-oz2wy
    @DebbieHart-oz2wy 14 дней назад +1

    I what tixtox to stay in America