Used to be my goto as it’s super sharp. But since going to the R/5/6 the autofocus is super slow. I used to think it was my copy. But I sold it and grabbed a brand new one. Same issue. It was especially horrible for weddings during dancing or moving kids. It just would not track my subjects very well. Since then I sold the second copy and got the tamron 35mm 1,4. Honestly it blows it out of the water in every way. Definitely an underrated lens. I guess I did not know what I was missing. If shooting models then the sigma is definitely a winner. But the Tamron is weather sealed and I think $100 more. Peace and love.
I love how sharp it is! I actually can’t say I’ve had an issue with the autofocus being slow, even when comparing it to my Canon 24-70mm. That being said, I haven’t tried the Tamron before! This is one of the downfalls to the Sigma is that it’s not weather sealed. Maybe I gotta try out the Tamron soon!
The Sigma 35mm f1.4 lens gives beautiful images. I use it for 4 years now, next to the 50mm and 85mm from Sigma's Art line (and also the Canon 135mm f2) for portraits.
The biggest disadvantage is that it is made of aluminum. Aluminum scratches very easily. I saw an aluminum lens from Sigma that looks very, very ugly, the paint has peeled off.
"For portraits, I prefer the 50mm focal length. I have the Sigma Art 50mm 1.4, and I think it's the best option in terms of versatility, sitting right in the middle between the 35mm and the 85mm."
What is your favourite lens for portraits?
I personally love my 70-200 for portraits, but I think I should do more wide portraits
@@DelaneyMedia it all depends on the look or style your going for! 70-200 is soo good tho!
Used to be my goto as it’s super sharp. But since going to the R/5/6 the autofocus is super slow. I used to think it was my copy. But I sold it and grabbed a brand new one. Same issue. It was especially horrible for weddings during dancing or moving kids. It just would not track my subjects very well. Since then I sold the second copy and got the tamron 35mm 1,4. Honestly it blows it out of the water in every way. Definitely an underrated lens. I guess I did not know what I was missing. If shooting models then the sigma is definitely a winner. But the Tamron is weather sealed and I think $100 more. Peace and love.
I love how sharp it is! I actually can’t say I’ve had an issue with the autofocus being slow, even when comparing it to my Canon 24-70mm. That being said, I haven’t tried the Tamron before! This is one of the downfalls to the Sigma is that it’s not weather sealed. Maybe I gotta try out the Tamron soon!
The Sigma 35mm f1.4 lens gives beautiful images. I use it for 4 years now, next to the 50mm and 85mm from Sigma's Art line (and also the Canon 135mm f2) for portraits.
Did you have to calibrate it when using the R?
Your video is amazing great job beautiful 😍👏👍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thank you!
anyone using this with apsc sensor meaning it's equivalent to a 56mm on canon?
hello sir , was watching your this video .. is this lens fit in canon 6d mark ii ..?
Yes this is the Sigma 35mm EF version which will work on the Canon 6d!
@@StefanoLombardoYT am confused between this lens & 50 mm 1.4 canon which one will you suggest me
What you are using in this video?
What adapter mount does it need for the EOS r?
Canon EF - RF: geni.us/MDYL
Is that any issue with canon r-6 mark 2 like focus hunt or any focus related issues
The biggest disadvantage is that it is made of aluminum. Aluminum scratches very easily. I saw an aluminum lens from Sigma that looks very, very ugly, the paint has peeled off.
A polycarbonate lens looks like new forever
"For portraits, I prefer the 50mm focal length. I have the Sigma Art 50mm 1.4, and I think it's the best option in terms of versatility, sitting right in the middle between the 35mm and the 85mm."
You camera bag should be very loud :))
getting the canon rf 35 1.8 is it any similar? cause its cheaper i mean
Sigma 35 1.4 is weather sealed.
Not the older HSM version he use here, but the new DG DN is.